hi today arrived my new vario3 cause my first get damaged at the usb connector. so took out the stuff tomorrow morning. i noticed that my first vario 3 had a Samsung battery and the new one has a Dynapack battery. so i decided to call the t-mob service. they told me the dynapack should be an upgraded one. the first devices where shipped with samsung.
but im confused now:
my first device had SN HT738
the new one has SN HT737
can anybody confirm this Dynapack batterypack?
the labels on the both packs are the same without the manufacturer. the one samsung the other dynapac. but the product numbers are different. the samsung has at the end 086 and the dynapac has 088. on the bottom of the dynapac accu is a aluminium plate. i think its because in the history much people said the battery goes warm or hot. so i think the dynapac is the newer version for our devices...
The metalwork on the bottom of the battery looks like a heatsink to me but it also looks like a ground plate for the battery itself so who knows.
Mine is a dynapack KAIS160 3.7vDC 1350 mAh pn:35H00088-00M
If that is any use to you?
Russ
its no use directly for me but for all other guys out there. which HT version do u have? in the german forum @ ppc-welt we saw that this dynapack is mostly shipped with HT versions lower than 738. the most devices with HT738 which are the highest versions right now have the samsung pack.
Related
I got question. Recived the tattoo, Im happy with it, but since checking/testing etc battery ends WAY to fast...
So what do u guys think about this battery?
h ttp://cgi.ebay.com/2000mAh-Battery-HTC-A3288-CLIC100-Tattoo-Free-Shipg_W0QQitemZ380222277672QQcmdZViewItemQQptZPDA_Accessories?hash=item5887038828
Could it be ok? Its kinda 2mAh instead of 1.1, but its not original, what could be its quality? ETC? Usefull to replace original with this one ? Want to use it instead of one inside not as backup battery...
there was a similar bettery for the touch diamond but it came with a new battery cover and made the phone twice its normal size!
I owuld be interested to read any reviews on this though
Hey
You should indeed look out with those High Capacity batteries. Most come with a thick cover, which you don't want, I presume .
I have also been following two batteries and I have even messaged some of the buyers.
First one I found: 1300mAh HIGH CAPACITY BATTERY FOR HTC TATTOO TOUCH2 UK:
h ttp://bit.ly/b4fs3E
I've already got two replies, both saying it is a bit better, but didn't make a world of difference.
Second battery: PDA BATTERY FOR HTC Diamond 2 Touch 2 Tattoo 1350mAh:
h ttp://bit.ly/bxpGvi
Just got one very positive reply. The buyer told me she only had to charge it daily, instead of three times a day. (Don't know how she manages to do that, perhaps with wi-fi 24/7 on or something ) But it sounds like a real improvement. I will probably buy the second one as well.
Greetings
I just bought a TyTN II from ebay.. I thought it would be a nice addition to my ever so small collection of PDA's, and it was relatively cheap.
Here's the link (remove spaces):
ht tp://c gi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260569169356#ht_3409wt_1276
Now, the seller claims it to be 100% oem, but I'm not completely sure.. In case it's a knockoff, I'll use Paypal to get my refund
So my question is, what do you guys think? is this the real deal, or just another fake TyTN II? I've heard about the knockoffs, but I havn't seen anyone.
You call that cheap? That's the real deal though.
yeah well, it's about 1/4 of retail price back in the days it's not too bad for nice little gadget like that
the auction doesn't display any photos of the actual phone, but I'm pretty confident that it's a legit OEM phone by the description, price and the claims made by the seller that it's "100% brand new & genuine or money return", even though it ships from HONG KONG
Anyway, what would a knockoff be like? and what's the price for one of those? What would one look for, in order to spot the knockoffs?
Cheers
Sorry for bumping this thread, but can anyone else confirm this is the real deal, so I can have some peace of mind?
Show us some real picks of it and we will tell you 100%
We know about this phone not the knock off's. If it doesn't look like the one in the pics then it's not what it says it is. It's a 3 year old phone, I wouldn't worry so much about knock off's.
Well, that would be like getting a picture from e.g t-mobile of the specific device you're gonna order. The seller is a powerseller with several (10+ in description) htc tytn II's.. When I ask him he keeps reassuring me that the phone is as described with official specs and pics from HTC and that it's 100 % brand new & genuine.
Would you feel good about this, or would you prepare for a full refund?
Well, I just got my Kaiser Eventhough it's a KAIS100, it has a front camera in addition to the rear-facing one. HTC could confirm it was the real deal, but... i think about the ONLY thing OEM in the package was the phone.... There were 3 chargers in the package (none of which fit !!!!) and i'm not too sure about the battery which said DynaPack on the outer side, and had å chrome-like inner side.
and btw, the battery is behaving weird. the phone takes a very long time to charge. lets say i have 50% battery, and i start charging for 30 min, and i end up with 55% battery.. then i reset my phone, and upon boot i all of a sudden have 82% (for instance)... i don't know if it's just old, or fake..
hanskl said:
Well, I just got my Kaiser Eventhough it's a KAIS100, it has a front camera in addition to the rear-facing one. HTC could confirm it was the real deal, but... i think about the ONLY thing OEM in the package was the phone.... There were 3 chargers in the package (none of which fit !!!!) and i'm not too sure about the battery which said DynaPack on the outer side, and had å chrome-like inner side.
and btw, the battery is behaving weird. the phone takes a very long time to charge. lets say i have 50% battery, and i start charging for 30 min, and i end up with 55% battery.. then i reset my phone, and upon boot i all of a sudden have 82% (for instance)... i don't know if it's just old, or fake..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have had three batteries so far for my Kaiser. One was the " chrome type " back, that was the original and the other two were cheap replacement batteries that were all black except for the terminals. They all worked the same.
I would just buy a new battery , seeing as the phone is new to you. Might as well start out with a new battery too.. If HTC ran the serial number and says the phone is legit, I wouldn't worry about wether it is real or not.
DENNCCOOOO
What he said.
Well, it seems its actually a modified AT&T Tilt with a added front camera. Void seals were broken, I think both front and backcover is fake, and the voicedialbutton doesn't show a image of a "speech bubble" but PTT (which seems to be used on AT&T phones)
An ATT Tilt is still a Kaiser..
papabear said:
An ATT Tilt is still a Kaiser..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, a Kaiser has a front camera, does the Tilt?
That's pretty strange, they replaced everything but the insides? The Keyboard isn't from a tilt (as far as I could tell).
ChumleyEX said:
Ok, a Kaiser has a front camera, does the Tilt?
That's pretty strange, they replaced everything but the insides? The Keyboard isn't from a tilt (as far as I could tell).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, very strange indeed. It seems as they took a tilt, put on a front camera, changed the housing and keyboard (it's not even a wwe keyboard - it has some chinese letters and other layout on the Fn-keys) and hspl'ed the phone with the first OliP0f hspl.... Either way, after confronting the seller, he did admit that it wasn't a unlocked HTC TyTN II, because they got the best prices on these phones from carriers... He also proposed to give me a 70 USD refund, and a HTC bluetooth headset as a compensation, after i expressed my dissapointment with the phone.
Well, i'm still not sure if the battery is OEM, and also if the housing and keyboard is OEM, but i guess i'll never know for sure
Hey all.
I've gone to WP7 (Focus, really liking it) and I'll be departing with my two Tilts.
Both unlocked
Heavily used (most soft keys have the icons gone, banged up, nothing missing). One has a cracked screen but is still usable)
Both running WM 6.5 OS from XDA (cracked screen one running Phoenix 3.1, other running KaiserTouch; both WWE)
Accessories include :
Charging cradle
Four batteries - 2 1350, 2 1600mAh
USB/mini USB cable
3 AC chargers, 1 car charger
2 microUSB/headphone adapters
1 3-in-one adapter (pretty cool item)
Extra back plate (not the best, but ya get an extra one...)
If anyone's interested, send me a PM.
SBJ
you should try posting this in the marketplace for better results as asking someone here would already own one....
Dear Sir,
I saw your advt to sell your phones. I am interested to buy. but i am from INDIA
Can you send the phones to me and what will be the cost
Kindly reply
B'rgds/Punnoose
mail : [email protected]
i am interested if still available. [email protected]
NOTE: I am in no way affiliated with ITSTEK or Amazon. It has taken me so long to find a good replacement charging port for the N7000 I wanted to share this with my fellow N7000 users on XDA.
100% ORIGINAL BRAND NEW Samsung N7000 Galaxy Note 1 & I9220 Charging Connector- micro port Flex & Mic, mobile phone repair part replacement, Samsung part no: GH59-11676A - Why buy copy or refurbished Parts and risk damaging your treasured & such expensive handset, Only From ITSTEK The UK`S Original Parts Specialist.
This is my third replacement Charging Connector and the only one that looks exactly like the original Samsung part and works perfectly.
No signal loss, no excessive battery drain, mic issues, etc.
I paid £18.95, which is cheaper than the Samsung Service centre were quoting me (£35).
I asked a question about whether this was an OEM part or not on Amazon and got lots of helpful replies.
The basic gist of the answers was that if you bought it from ITSTEK it works perfectly, buying from anywhere else was a bit of a risk and in most cases was a copy that suffered from the normal copy issues.
The answer is in the product name:
100% ORIGINAL BRAND NEW ..................... Only From ITSTEK The UK`S Original Parts Specialist.
So why take the risk of ordering from a different seller for a couple of quid saving and end up with a dud.
I am sure the previous two replacements I had purchased were copies.
They both cost much less than a tenner.
They had signal problems and didn't quite look exactly the same as the Samsung original.
The two sets of raised connectors were silvery in colour, not golden as on the original Samsung part.
The text on the board was close to the original, but not exactly the same, missing the production date etc.
Hope this helps some N7000 users out there, it has taken me six months in total to replace my broken Samsung part with a good quality, fully working replacement.
I was so impressed I actually wrote a product review on Amazon.
NOTE: ITSTEK are based in the UK but can ship internationally (according to their blurb on the Amazon site).
Update after 2 months of use
I have been using this replacement part for over two months now without issue.
The charging works perfectly.
The microphone hasn't gone wrong, which happened with a cheapo copy I tried.
The battery is not draining abnormally.
The signal strength for WiFi and GSM-HSDPA is consistent and strong.
Frankly I'm amazed, I thought I would have to pay the Samsung service centre to sort this out.
Which kinda goes against my grain..... I like to fix stuff myself.
Hello,
i bought a new LG G4 battery.
Bought from Amazon, but im not sure, if its orginal.
Left one is the original, right one the new one.
1. back
2. front
3. top
The differences i see is:
back:
the date is older
on original is (D) ( i think means country -> Germany) on new on <L>
dont know why they use square bracket instead of a normal one
date is different font
original icons are bigger
front:
on new one thetexts and logo are more at the bottom
top:
circle is white on original, on new is black
you can see on original small circles on connection points
Could some of you check if they have a similar battery? so i could get sure, that is not fake, just an older version
i actually received an (L) with my g4 but when i bought the new battery it was a (D). you should be fine its real
I actually think it is a fake. Or the designer should be fired because of using free fonts instead of proper professional ones.
The hinting and kerning is very poor. I simply do not believe an original battery would have printing this bad.
Pfeffernuss said:
I actually think it is a fake. Or the designer should be fired because of using free fonts instead of proper professional ones.
The hinting and kerning is very poor. I simply do not believe an original battery would have printing this bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now you confused me again
I didnt look exactly at the font, only to things, which can be easily seen.
Here's the photo I took both of mines do have the white spot though
i think it's a fake
The one from Amazon does not have the water detection sticker. All my original batteries from the G4 have this.
Dimensional Difference, Qi Incompatibility
yener90 said:
Hello,
i bought a new LG G4 battery.
Bought from Amazon, but im not sure, if its orginal.
Left one is the original, right one the new one.
1. back
2. front
3. top
The differences i see is:
back:
the date is older
on original is (D) ( i think means country -> Germany) on new on <L>
dont know why they use square bracket instead of a normal one
date is different font
original icons are bigger
front:
on new one thetexts and logo are more at the bottom
top:
circle is white on original, on new is black
you can see on original small circles on connection points
Could some of you check if they have a similar battery? so i could get sure, that is not fake, just an older version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had two original batteries, one that came with the phone and one sent by LG with a charger as a comp for buying the phone several months ago.
Both batteries are fully interchangeable, and both accept charging by my PowerBot Qi charger which I keep on the desk.
However, a third battery arrived yesterday after purchasing on Amazon. I charged it up on the LG charger, and then installed it in the phone.
There were problems.
The new battery, which is the L model, was a very tight fit in the phone from top to bottom, but it did go in. When I tried to put the back cover on the phone, it was a very, very tight fit, and I had to do some extra work to get the back cover attached.
When the L battery was in the phone, everything seemed to function OK, and it appears to be electrically compatible with the hardware, but when I put the phone on the Qi charger I could not make a connection. I am guessing there is some sort of compression/interference with the induction coil.
When I pulled the battery out of the phone, I used a micrometer to measure the thickness front-to-back, and the L battery is 2-3 thousandths of an inch thicker than the D batteries.
It may be a counterfeit, or it may be something licensed to a different manufacturer, I don't know.
But it is a trifle different from the D battery.
Incidentally, the L battery is dated 9-27-15, so it appears to be fresh production.
Let me know if anybody runs into similar inconsistencies.
Enzo Ferraro
I will send it back. I was told that it was original.
Im afraid of exploding batteries. Dont want to destroy my phone.
Thanks for all your help
jobella said:
The one from Amazon does not have the water detection sticker. All my original batteries from the G4 have this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ones sent from LG for the July promo which has the battery, battery case, leather back does has a plain white sticker instead of the moisture detection sticker as I have three separate packages. The one sold by Verizon Wireless unlike the one received from LG and what came from the phone mentions the cells made in Japan instead of China. All of them are D's except the Verizon Wireless was in a official LG box and dated early June 2015 while the 3 from LG from the promotion were June 2015 received in September 2015 and September 2015 for the ones received in December 2015 and January 2016.
Had same problem with lg g3. The free battery looked different than the stock one that came with the phone
yener90 said:
I will send it back. I was told that it was original.
Im afraid of exploding batteries. Dont want to destroy my phone.
You're right to be afraid of exploding batteries. Here's what mine looked like after it went off in my pocket
Bought as a genuine OEM after not being able to find a battery on LG's website or through my carrier. LG claims this is not a genuine battery. Anyone know how I could confirm?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse