Related
Just wondering, I found these:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...t_shr?_encoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance
They are the correct micro USB charging units, but they are designed for Blackberry smartphones...Will these properly and safely charge our HD2's?
I love the folding plug design.
Hello Free Man:
FWIW..I had purchased one of these exact items from amazon. Haven't used it yet but I read the backpanel and the output is 5v @ 700ma. If you look at the backpanel specs for the wall charger shipped with your unit from HTC it'll show 5v @ 1A on the output. So the unit will work but will take slightly longer, I think.
Take Care
Well as long as it is safe to use, mine should be here in a few days. I would think it would simply take 30% longer to do a full charge and I am only really using the unit to charge overnight when on the road in hotels, so that is really not an issue as a full charge only takes a short time.
Anyone else want to step in and comment on the lower rating?
You are correct, this charger will take longer to fully charge the battery.
Just like charging from a PC USB port takes even longer since that only provides 500mA maximum.
It is absolutely safe to use chargers with lower ampere rating, the downside is that you will either get longer charge time it your device won't charge at all. But nothing will burn or explode.
So you are saying my device will charge safely, just take 30% longer? You mentioned something about it not charging at all, why would it not charge?
Will this shorten the batter life or anything to that affect? Thanks!
vangrieg said:
It is absolutely safe to use chargers with lower ampere rating, the downside is that you will either get longer charge time it your device won't charge at all. But nothing will burn or explode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Free Man said:
So you are saying my device will charge safely, just take 30% longer? You mentioned something about it not charging at all, why would it not charge?
Will this shorten the batter life or anything to that affect? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may not charge at all if the device you are charging needs a certain amount of amperage in order to charge the battery.
No, this will not affect the battery life or anything to that affect.
Thanks, I plugged it in and charged it for 3 minutes and it did begin charging from 69 to 80% in that period, so it works fine and is quite fast. This battery charges fast in my experience.
Just got a griffin powerjolt micro, comes with an ipod cable so you'll have to use your own, but it charges the streak up a treat
Think it was 12 pounds from amazon.
It's designed for iPads, which need 2 amps, it's rated for 2.1 amps. Charged from 30 to 60% in 20 mins while using gps.
Hope that's useful .
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
For battery life is better to charge with low amps and for a long time. I would prefer ,not to use a charger with more than 1A
i got myself te belkin 1A charger. Should work good I guess.
As mentioned in the other thread, both these two work just fine :
https://www.dealextreme.com/p/car-p...cable-charger-set-for-apple-ipad-12-24v-45227
https://www.dealextreme.com/p/car-cigarette-powered-1000ma-usb-adapter-charger-black-dc-12v-40470
$6 or $2 including free shipping worldwide. You'll need the Streak's USB cable to connect it.
Anbuch said:
For battery life is better to charge with low amps and for a long time. I would prefer ,not to use a charger with more than 1A
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The car charger does not force power into the phone, the phone draws what it needs. Using a power supply with a higher Amp rating means less strain on the charger not more power than is needed going into the phone.
Sorry for my bad English, I guess you do not understand what I mean.
You're right that the car charger with more amps does not force more power into the phone (I do not say that),but if you use a charger with more amps , charging time is less. The battery prefers long time charging with less charging amps. In fact using less charging amps ,the battery allowed to load more power (a little bit ). You can try it by using a USB port of yours computer to charge the battery.
Anbuch said:
Sorry for my bad English, I guess you do not understand what I mean.
You're right that the car charger with more amps does not force more power into the phone (I do not say that),but if you use a charger with more amps , charging time is less. The battery prefers long time charging with less charging amps. In fact using less charging amps ,the battery allowed to load more power (a little bit ). You can try it by using a USB port of yours computer to charge the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it's just me, but what you are saying is exactly the same thing.
If the charger isn't forcing more power into the phone, then the charging time will not change. If the battery is receiving less current then what it was designed, such as a low powered USB port, then it would take longer then normal to fully charge. But once the charger puts out the amount of current that the battery will normally draw, the battery will only charge at that rate. Increasing the current beyond that amount will not speed up the charging time or push more current to the battery.
brianlp said:
If the battery is receiving less current then what it was designed, such as a low powered USB port, then it would take longer then normal to fully charge. But once the charger puts out the amount of current that the battery will normally draw, the battery will only charge at that rate. Increasing the current beyond that amount will not speed up the charging time or push more current to the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anbuch is trying to say that the battery will last longer in the first scenario - the longer, slower charge from the low powered USB port.
Quicker battery charging does degrade the cells in less time - if you were to always use a 500mA charger, you would get more life from the battery than if you were to always use the stock 1000mA charger.
You can pick up a replacement battery from eBay for $10, so none of this really matters - when your battery wears out in 18 months, just buy a new one.
Nomgle ,thanks, this is exactly what I wanted to say!
I just gave an example with a USB port. In fact a USB port and a stock 1000mA charger are save enough for the battery of a Streak (1530mA). I just wanted to say : Do not use 2100 mA charger
Flinx78 said:
.... it's rated for 2.1 amps. Charged from 30 to 60% in 20 mins while using gps....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will "kill" the battery very soon
Some battery reading:
Understanding lithium-ion
Charging lithium-ion batteries
How to prolong lithium-based batteries
From the last page linked:
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Generally speaking, batteries live longer if treated in a gentle manner. High charge voltages, excessive charge rate and extreme load conditions will have a negative effect and shorten the battery life. This also applies to high current rate lithium-ion batteries.
Not only is it better to charge lithium-ion battery at a slower charge rate, high discharge rates also contribute the extra wear and tear.[/FONT]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.
I use a black&decker converter and it has a usb port already built into it and that works pretty good for me.
Sent from the phone killer of ALL phone's, Dell Streak!
Hi, would a regular charger be better to use vs the turbo charger for the longevity of the battery? Would a regular charger work ok with this phone?
Thanks
pred8er said:
Hi, would a regular charger be better to use vs the turbo charger for the longevity of the battery? Would a regular charger work ok with this phone?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the turbo charger the device gets pretty warm
Hard to say but I don't think the turbo charger would damage the battery since it actually only ships with it. I would be surprised if it is a problem.
The way I understand it is that the turbo charger will step down as the battery reaches a fuller charge.
You can use the turbo charger on older devices without issue as the circuitry will account for this.
joderme said:
The way I understand it is that the turbo charger will step down as the battery reaches a fuller charge.
You can use the turbo charger on older devices without issue as the circuitry will account for this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This
I don't think Qualcomm would design a charger that would speed up the life of a battery because that would give them a bad reputation. I've used the quick charger since I got my Nexus until today because now I use my TYLT qi charger. I have noticed no negative effects of using it, and as stated the chip set is what dictates the charging speed. The chip will not let the battery get too hot assuming the chip is working so I would not worry.
Pilz said:
I don't think Qualcomm would design a charger that would speed up the life of a battery because that would give them a bad reputation. I've used the quick charger since I got my Nexus until today because now I use my TYLT qi charger. I have noticed no negative effects of using it, and as stated the chip set is what dictates the charging speed. The chip will not let the battery get too hot assuming the chip is working so I would not worry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also forgot that if the battery gets too hot charging will stop as Pilz mentioned above. I have seen this before on my SGS5 with wireless charging as it can generate a good amount of heat. I would imagine the Nexus 6 is the same.
Okay. A quick lesson on chargers may be in order.
What you'd consider a regular 2A charger, is actually a "Quick Charge 1.0" charger, which charges at 5V @ 2A, for a total of 10W of power. A Quick Charge 2.0 charger, which Motorola calls a "Turbo Charger" charges at 5V, 9V, and/or 12V @ up to 3A each, for a total of 15, 27, of 36W respectively. Thus, in theory, a QC2.0 could charge up to (almost) 75% faster than a QC 1.0 charger. That's where that number that's being touted around comes from. The reality, so far though, is far different.
The Moto charger does actually charge at all three voltages (whereas most QC 2.0 charger only seem to charge at 5V and 9V), but it charges @ 1.6A in 5V mode (8W), 1.6A in 9V mode (14.4W), and 1.2A in 12V mode (14.4W). Thus, in the top two modes, it charges at just under the equivalent of a 3A "normal" (QC 1.0) charger, then drops down to about 80% of a standard 2A charger when the battery gets close to full.
With more power (watts) comes more heat, so yes, the battery does appear to get a lot warmer than with your normal charger. However, it's still well within the "normal" range that your battery was designed to handle. It may feel warm (or even hot) to you, but trust me, your battery is fine. In fact, there are safeguards in place to protect your battery. If you battery ever gets too hot, your phone will shut down and stop charging altogether. Some owners of a Tylt Vu can attest, since that particular charger has a reputation of wireless charging problems that caused the phones' safeguards to kick in. You should know though, that by the time that safeguard even kicks in, the phone will become MUCH too hot to touch. If you THINK that the phone is too hot, then it isn't. Believe me, the blisters on your fingers will let you know when a battery REALLY reaches a dangerous temperature. If you're able to hold onto the phone for more than a few seconds, then the battery is certainly not in any danger.
In a normal QC 2.0 charger, will that small amount of excess heat reduce the life of your battery? Technically, yes, but the same can be said about charging it with that 2A charger, vs. the 500mA USB port on your computer. It may reduce the life by a month or so, and still last more than double the 1 or 2 years that you're likely to own your phone. In short, don't worry about it. Your battery will likely still last MUCH longer than you'll need it.
Thnx for all the input!
jt3 said:
Okay. A quick lesson on chargers may be in order.
What you'd consider a regular 2A charger, is actually a "Quick Charge 1.0" charger, which charges at 5V @ 2A, for a total of 10W of power. A Quick Charge 2.0 charger, which Motorola calls a "Turbo Charger" charges at 5V, 9V, and/or 12V @ up to 3A each, for a total of 15, 27, of 36W respectively. Thus, in theory, a QC2.0 could charge up to (almost) 75% faster than a QC 1.0 charger. That's where that number that's being touted around comes from. The reality, so far though, is far different.
The Moto charger does actually charge at all three voltages (whereas most QC 2.0 charger only seem to charge at 5V and 9V), but it charges @ 1.6A in 5V mode (8W), 1.6A in 9V mode (14.4W), and 1.2A in 12V mode (14.4W). Thus, in the top two modes, it charges at just under the equivalent of a 3A "normal" (QC 1.0) charger, then drops down to about 80% of a standard 2A charger when the battery gets close to full.
With more power (watts) comes more heat, so yes, the battery does appear to get a lot warmer than with your normal charger. However, it's still well within the "normal" range that your battery was designed to handle. It may feel warm (or even hot) to you, but trust me, your battery is fine. In fact, there are safeguards in place to protect your battery. If you battery ever gets too hot, your phone will shut down and stop charging altogether. Some owners of a Tylt Vu can attest, since that particular charger has a reputation of wireless charging problems that caused the phones' safeguards to kick in. You should know though, that by the time that safeguard even kicks in, the phone will become MUCH too hot to touch. If you THINK that the phone is too hot, then it isn't. Believe me, the blisters on your fingers will let you know when a battery REALLY reaches a dangerous temperature. If you're able to hold onto the phone for more than a few seconds, then the battery is certainly not in any danger.
In a normal QC 2.0 charger, will that small amount of excess heat reduce the life of your battery? Technically, yes, but the same can be said about charging it with that 2A charger, vs. the 500mA USB port on your computer. It may reduce the life by a month or so, and still last more than double the 1 or 2 years that you're likely to own your phone. In short, don't worry about it. Your battery will likely still last MUCH longer than you'll need it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very nice, thanks for this :good:
@jt3 Thanks for the explanation. I would think the voltage somehow plays a part in this, right? As you pointed out, if you look at straight watts, our Quickcharger is only putting out 44% more power versus a last gen phone. Also, since our charger supports both 9v and 12v at 14.4W, that further points to the idea that voltage plays a part here. I would assume it affects the efficiency of the charge? Otherwise why not just build this with 5v and 3 or 4 amps?
TheSopranos16 said:
@jt3 Thanks for the explanation. I would think the voltage somehow plays a part in this, right? As you pointed out, if you look at straight watts, our Quickcharger is only putting out 44% more power versus a last gen phone. Also, since our charger supports both 9v and 12v at 14.4W, that further points to the idea that voltage plays a part here. I would assume it affects the efficiency of the charge? Otherwise why not just build this with 5v and 3 or 4 amps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and no. The reason for changing the voltage instead of the current has to do with something called Joule Heating, and if you thought my last post was technical and complicated, you just dropped down the rabbit hole.
Think of it like a garden hose. Voltage would be the diameter of the hose. Current would be the rate in which water flowed through the hose. If, say, you wanted to fill your dog's water bowl, and for some insane reason, you want it to take exactly 30 seconds to do so. You could either get a larger diameter hose, and turn down the flow of water, or get a smaller diameter hose and turn up the flow. In the end, the dog's bowl gets filled in the same amount of time. (Electrical Engineers will likely gripe and say that the diameter of the hose is more accurately Resistance, rather than Voltage. Yeah, well... shut up! This is my story! Seriously, I'm being a bit inaccurate, but it makes it easier to picture this way.)
Same thing here. By cranking up the voltage (volts), they can turn down the current (amps) to achieve the same power (watts). In the case of the 12V vs. 9V on the Turbo Charger, it's the same exact power, which doesn't seem to make sense, and furthermore (as you said), why not just keep it 5V and raise current to 3A, since that's also (more or less) the same amount of power? Okay, remember that dog bowl? what happens when you really crank the water flow and point it toward that dog bowl? It splatters, and because of this, a measurable amount of water actually ends up outside of the bowl -- wasted. Same thing here. By cranking up the current, you lose more in the form of heat. By dialing that down (but keeping the power the same, by raising the voltage), you can reduce the heat generation at the same power level.
So... The "tl;dr" of it all is that a 12V charger, pushing (around) 15W of power generates less heat than that 5V, 3A charger would, even though the power is the same. The heat generated isn't huge at these small numbers, but we're talking REALLY confined spaces, with no fans or really any form of ventilation. A few degrees here and there can really make a difference.
So yesterday I bought a 2.0 charger off of amazon with the choe brand name. According to the ad it works with nearly every android phone, including the HTC one m8. For the past year I have been using a charger from my last phone which was a crappy flip phone and thought nothing of it, but I am wondering does this charger truly work?? According to app "Ampere" it is much slower. Also, I've read reports about phones heating up and that's what mine did last night, is that normal? How long should it take for me to full charge my HTC one m8?
It will heat up, that is normal. It'll use most of its 2.4A between 20 and 70% and then slow down. Your total charge time shouldn't take more than 1 hour, and make sure you're using the supplied cable.
Thanks for the response! So if it doesn't charge 1 to 100 in 1 hour than is something wrong? Also will a charger like this have any effect on how long my battery lasts? My last charger for whatever reason was for my last flip phone believe it or not, I never bought a new one.
Black_magic100 said:
Thanks for the response! So if it doesn't charge 1 to 100 in 1 hour than is something wrong? Also will a charger like this have any effect on how long my battery lasts? My last charger for whatever reason was for my last flip phone believe it or not, I never bought a new one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no I wouldn't say that.
my 2.0 QC will get it done in about 1-2 hours compared to the 3-5 or so it took with stock charger.
0-100% will take more than an hour. I've timed mine a few times from 0-100%, not using the phone at all and in airplane mode waking it up every 5 minutes to check percentage, volts, and charge rate using Gsam batt monitor.
Comparing the two chargers (OEM HTC QC 2.0, and original HTC charger- which I believe is QC 1.0) the QC 2.0 is definitely faster. Even though there is nothing on the phone telling you it is using the higher wattage charging mode, it is. So, 0 to 100% using HTC's QC2, usually takes around 1:20 minutes if I remember right. As in the other post, it starts out rather slow to around 20%, then kicks in to high gear until around 80%, then slows back down all the way to 100% so as to not overcharge the battery and harm it. It really is amazing the speed that it charges at. It does get rather warm, which is normal, but shouldn't hurt the phone.
Now, completely draining and recharging these batteries frequently is not good for them and will decrease the useful life sooner. Keeping it somewhere around 80 % is ideal but realistically not practical and the manufacturers know that. That's why they build in overcharge circuitry protection so leaving the charger on all the time "shouldn't" harm the battery. Draining it down to zero and doing a full recharge cycle on it frequently WILL decrease the lifespan. The batterie's useful life is basically determined by a finite number of charge cycles.
There's tons of info on charging and batteries out there if you are looking for more reading too.
Anyone heard of the brand Auzen? It's popping up alot on aliexpress and around asian market. Not too much reviews yet on that brand.
don't play with quick chargers .I bloated my m8 batt once trying it .it charge at 2.4a .our device max is 1.5a.
If you insist using it then don't full charge with it n monitor closely .
That's impressive, I use a QC2.0 car charger, I use a variety of wall chargers that run from 1.0A to 2.3A at 5V.
So far, my battery is still very happy.
Sounds like you got a cheap knock off charger or your battery/charging circuitry was damaged/faulty and/or your ROM/firmware weren't proper, for that kind of damage to occur.
I don't think Ampere works. I once did a test (last month) and had 6 different USB cables and I wanted to see which was the best, every time I used one I got a different reading, from 200 up to 1600. Even using my Anker Quick Charge 2.0 I only got 400 so it stated.
I have been using Aukey QuickCharge 2.0 and gives pretty decent charge times.
I have a QUICK Changer 2.0. works great.. have some tips...
You know there is some colors on cable conectors ends you have to choose the right one..
- If the cable is not a quality one can result to slow charging.
Black ----- 1.0. most in stock phones
White------ 2.0. the right for fast charging...
The time on reaching 100% on battery,well Quickly charger 2.0 will reach 80% on your battery fast and it will change the next 20% slower...
There is some app in playstore can help can see the amperage live in mA..
Connect your charger to get the battery charging current or disconnect it and get the negative discharging current... and you can see your battery charging current mA is constantly changing because even on charging phone still using current (negative discharging current) and this is always changing.
On my case I see higher mA reading only under really low battery...
I have a problem with my m8 and aukey 2.0 quick charger....
After firmware update to 6.12.xxx.xxx mm , the app ampere tell me max 1600ma before update its tell 2000ma .. Its a bug or a feature of the new firmware base...??? I have cyanogenmod 13
Im using the same aukey 2.0 quick charger. Works perfect.
M8 is 1.5a max .if you use 2.0a logically you're overcharging it. Just wait for it to get bloat n replace the whole bat. worth it ?
Hi, i just wanted to say something. After many bad chargers i bought, i found the Nillkin chargers (2Amps)and Nillkin cables (2.1Amp) the best and best quality. I am always testing with good Usb voltage tester and it can charge up to 1.5 amps max on M8 and on LG G3 1.8 Amps. As long as the charger is 5.0V, amps can variate and it doesnt hurt your battery, it just charges slower or faster. In my case its charging 1% per minute on both phones. It doesn't matter if the cable is black, white, green... cables must be thick, around 18AWG that support high ampers which mean faster charging. thin cables are sh!#. And for car i also found the Scosche dual charger great for every device with Nillkin 30cm cables and Kenu airframe holder.
You can use 2.4A chargers on M8 without problem as it will only receive 1.5amps.
GL
I'm using Anker PowerPort 1+. It's very good and you can use for iPhone iPad & almost Android devices.
I bought it here: http://www.amazon.com/Anker-Charger-PowerPort-Samsung-Wireless/dp/B014F3D8FQ
henryrk said:
M8 is 1.5a max .if you use 2.0a logically you're overcharging it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That logic is incorrect. The phone will only draw as many amps as its rated for (1.5 amps) regardless of what the charger is rated to supply. Think of the charger amp rating as the "maximum it can supply" instead of "what it will always supply".
henryrk said:
M8 is 1.5a max .if you use 2.0a logically you're overcharging it. Just wait for it to get bloat n replace the whole bat. worth it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ampere shows max charge rate for me at 2000ma. Where do you get the idea it will overcharge?
So few days ago got the phone , but always charged it through USB port. Now finally tried turbo charger and it definitely isn't "turbo". I know most of those Turbo claims what I saw were just selling strategy , but I'm pretty sure I'm not even getting 1% - 1 minute. Latest Marshmallow OTA.
So , on a relatively new battery , how fast does your phones charge ? You can write with phone turned off and on..
Also looking at the charger it says for output :
Standard output :5V =1.6A
Turbo output :9v=1.6A
Turbo2 output :12v = 1.2A
This deosn't make any sense to me, while raising volts may solve some power losses through cable , amps are what charges your phone faster or slower , and 1.6A , isn't really a big deal not to mention 1.2A. Reading somewhere that quick charge 2,0 supports up to 3amps draw..
I have One Plus one and it's original charger is 2.1A (quick charge 1.0 ) , with custom kernel bumped charging rate all the way up and good cable I'm seeing about 2Amps of charging in real life , or little more than 1% per minute . I was expecting motorola to charge faster or at least even , even though they are 3100 vs 3900mAh batteries.. Not to mention I can easily mod OnePlus One and get same SOT and battery overall as motorola's, while on motorola I'm stuck with stupid locked bootloader . Original idea was to sell OnePlus One because of Motorola, but I don't know now anymore..
The volts and amps listed on an electrical device are typically its max or rated output, NOT what it "always" delivers. That being said, most power supplies will deliver their rated voltage most of the time, but the current is determined by the charged device (through it's effective resistance)... so as long as you run below the rated current, you'd be fine.
Secondly, from what I'm reading, the OPO doesn't have quick-charge technology (ref: https://www.reddit.com/r/oneplus/co...lcomm_quickcharge_20/?st=ix64k1gy&sh=6d7492c9 ) so I'm not sure what you're talking about there. Again, the charger may say 2.1A, but that doesn't mean it's actually delivering that much all the time. I have a relatively old Kindle Fire with a 2.1A charger, but I know it doesn't charge very fast even with that device.
If you want to talk about Volts and Amps, you need to use actual volt/amp meters to see what you're getting.. Note, there is an app for Android (called Ampere) that claims to report amp-rates, but it also has a caveat saying that the current should not be taken as completely accurate, for various reasons.
Lastly, note that QC doesn't actually run when you are at higher charge levels... I think it's above 80% or something? After that level, it returns to "standard charging" mode for this "top-off" phase of the battery charge cycle. So, if you're seeing slow charge rates there, it's to be expected.
The Turbo has a relatively massive battery. Mine takes...somewhere upwards of 3ish hours on turbo charging to replenish.
1 hour 15 minutes
that's what it takes to go from 0 to 100% using Turbo Charger 2.0
Thank you all for answering, this is exactly why I started this thread. Already see here some interesting results!
schwinn8 said:
The volts and amps listed on an electrical device are typically its max or rated output, NOT what it "always" delivers. That being said, most power supplies will deliver their rated voltage most of the time, but the current is determined by the charged device (through it's effective resistance)... so as long as you run below the rated current, you'd be fine.
Secondly, from what I'm reading, the OPO doesn't have quick-charge technology (ref: https://www.reddit.com/r/oneplus/co...lcomm_quickcharge_20/?st=ix64k1gy&sh=6d7492c9 ) so I'm not sure what you're talking about there. Again, the charger may say 2.1A, but that doesn't mean it's actually delivering that much all the time. I have a relatively old Kindle Fire with a 2.1A charger, but I know it doesn't charge very fast even with that device.
If you want to talk about Volts and Amps, you need to use actual volt/amp meters to see what you're getting.. Note, there is an app for Android (called Ampere) that claims to report amp-rates, but it also has a caveat saying that the current should not be taken as completely accurate, for various reasons.
Lastly, note that QC doesn't actually run when you are at higher charge levels... I think it's above 80% or something? After that level, it returns to "standard charging" mode for this "top-off" phase of the battery charge cycle. So, if you're seeing slow charge rates there, it's to be expected.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Actually, OnePlus ONE DOES have quick charge 1.0 which is 5v up to 2.1A. Snapdragon 801 supports quick charge 2.0 but OPO didn't implement it with phone. There are billions of topic on this at OPO forum and a lot of people done tests including myself. The problem with OPO is it's very sensitive on cable so it works best with OEM cable and it somehow recognizes it. There is app called OPO charging current so I monitored with it and synapse . Kernel setup hardware to be able to recive very max 2100mA no mather which cable. Stock ONEplus charger. Some cheap cables gave me from 300 - 600 mA max with screen on . I found at home some cable that looked cheap but said charge only, tried and it charged around 1600mA with screen on and around 1800 screen off. Later got Anker 21 AWG and results were even better , aroun 1800-1900mA screen on and close to maximum 2000mA screen off. Phone was charging 1% in less than a minute. Thought turbo can charge at same rate. After all , it's "boosted" lol.
I know it doesn't do quick charge after around 75% , I tried at 30%. Given all that , 1600mA which is maximum I see on the Motorola's charger is not something special if we disregard Voltage..
Einsteindks said:
The Turbo has a relatively massive battery. Mine takes...somewhere upwards of 3ish hours on turbo charging to replenish.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sparksys said:
1 hour 15 minutes
that's what it takes to go from 0 to 100% using Turbo Charger 2.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again this is very interesting. Already here we see 2 totally different results with one being almost as double fast.. Sparksys , you are on stock charger and stock cable?
Because if you charge from 0-100 in 1h 15min, thats around 3.2Amps charging current , while our buddy Einsteindks here gets around 1.3Amps and max amp I see on "rola's charger is 1.6Amps. I'm confused now.
Also can somebody post picof stock droid turbo USB cable shipped in bundle? I think I don't have stock cable, it says right at the plug phone side "be hello". No other labels or anything..
EjđiSixo said:
Thank you all for answering, this is exactly why I started this thread. Already see here some interesting results!
Thanks! Actually, OnePlus ONE DOES have quick charge 1.0 which is 5v up to 2.1A. Snapdragon 801 supports quick charge 2.0 but OPO didn't implement it with phone. There are billions of topic on this at OPO forum and a lot of people done tests including myself. The problem with OPO is it's very sensitive on cable so it works best with OEM cable and it somehow recognizes it. There is app called OPO charging current so I monitored with it and synapse . Kernel setup hardware to be able to recive very max 2100mA no mather which cable. Stock ONEplus charger. Some cheap cables gave me from 300 - 600 mA max with screen on . I found at home some cable that looked cheap but said charge only, tried and it charged around 1600mA with screen on and around 1800 screen off. Later got Anker 21 AWG and results were even better , aroun 1800-1900mA screen on and close to maximum 2000mA screen off. Phone was charging 1% in less than a minute. Thought turbo can charge at same rate. After all , it's "boosted" lol.
I know it doesn't do quick charge after around 75% , I tried at 30%. Given all that , 1600mA which is maximum I see on the Motorola's charger is not something special if we disregard Voltage..
Again this is very interesting. Already here we see 2 totally different results with one being almost as double fast.. Sparksys , you are on stock charger and stock cable?
Because if you charge from 0-100 in 1h 15min, thats around 3.2Amps charging current , while our buddy Einsteindks here gets around 1.3Amps and max amp I see on "rola's charger is 1.6Amps. I'm confused now.
Also can somebody post picof stock droid turbo USB cable shipped in bundle? I think I don't have stock cable, it says right at the plug phone side "be hello". No other labels or anything..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was guess-timating. Been a while since I've done the full recharge.
Einsteindks said:
I was guess-timating. Been a while since I've done the full recharge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to your guess-timate and max rated power I see on the charger, that seems about right and realistic guess BUT there also isn't anything TURBO about it. I'ts the average charging speed of every device today (1.5A) which doesn't have any kind of quick charge option. Even quick charge 1.0 is faster with 2.1A at 5v . Thats why I opened this topic, I'm confused.
Only voltage is higher on turbo charger than let's say my OPO charger but amps are lower and voltage doesn't have that much of an impact on charging speed, amps do!
When I have my Turbo in my truck at night, and running about a dozen things at once, in addition to all the background stuff, NO 'regular' charger can keep up with the power demand, and the battery undergoes a insanely slow discharge. By itself, the battery lasts 3 or 4 hours, tops. With the turbocharger, the battery charges at a modest rate, maybe 10% per 30 minutes...while under high demand.
Einsteindks said:
When I have my Turbo in my truck at night, and running about a dozen things at once, in addition to all the background stuff, NO 'regular' charger can keep up with the power demand, and the battery undergoes a insanely slow discharge. By itself, the battery lasts 3 or 4 hours, tops. With the turbocharger, the battery charges at a modest rate, maybe 10% per 30 minutes...while under high demand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That seems ok.
I encourage others to post their charging times so we can compare!
Thanks
Since no other turbo users jumped in...
At the time of starting the topic I have disabled some Verizon's bloatware (completely stock, locked turbo). After reflashing completely stock FW , and with untouched software, droid really did charged turbo fast. More than 1% per minute and around 0-60% for 30min just as advertised for quick charge 2.0 . So if anyone was wondering, that should be benchmark.
On the other hand, phone is almost impossible to charge with any other type of "normal" charger..
My Turbo, running stock MM/root/Xposed with a large load of apps, will charge 20-30% per hour on a normal 1A charger, while lying on the desk with the screen off. It charges at a similar rate via Qi wireless charging. This is plenty for daily overnight charging. My usage habits are such that I usually have 20-40% battery left when I get home from work in the evening.
In a different usage case, when I play Ingress (a real battery eater, screen on + 3D animated graphics + GPS + data) the Qi charger in my car holds discharge to about 5-10% per hour.
I've never had a turbo charger to compare, but I've never found the normal charger or Qi charger to be significantly lacking.
Spott07 said:
My Turbo, running stock MM/root/Xposed with a large load of apps, will charge 20-30% per hour on a normal 1A charger, while lying on the desk with the screen off. It charges at a similar rate via Qi wireless charging. This is plenty for daily overnight charging. My usage habits are such that I usually have 20-40% battery left when I get home from work in the evening.
In a different usage case, when I play Ingress (a real battery eater, screen on + 3D animated graphics + GPS + data) the Qi charger in my car holds discharge to about 5-10% per hour.
I've never had a turbo charger to compare, but I've never found the normal charger or Qi charger to be significantly lacking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, I've also used "normal" charger before. Now, I have all QuickCharge plug chargers -- but I still use Qi wireless charging every day, as does my wife.
I also plug in via USB port on my computer and it charges fine.
okay the way the turbo charging works is that it's like a tier system at very very low charge percentages it works the fastest and slows off after about 60 or 70 percent it just charges like a regular charger all the magic happens at the lower charges. another thing is that unless the cable you are using is total garbage it won't matter at all. it is all the phone and the ac adapter that do the work any variations in the cable will be negligible. I am monitoring my battery through the custom kernel (bhb27 and its app) and it says right now at 81% charge on a turbo charging that I am getting +1172.x mA if my battery was lower this value would be much much higher
lastly I recommend only using the turbo charger when you really need power quickly. if you are just plugging in your phone for the night it makes no sense and will actually be bad for your battery health. the faster it charges the more it heats up and heat is not good for the battery health when I plug my phone in at night I use a .5 amp charger and my phone says that it will need like 8 or 9 hours to charge (this may be exsessive but the quick chargers heat up my phone a lot I also use a 1 and 2 amp charger nearby