Here is a link to handango site, they have some stuff available for g1. Remember you have to allow access to download these to your g1. To allow go to menu/settings/applications and check box to allow apps not in the market to be downloaded.
http://www.handango.com/SoftwareCat...73&siteId=1&choice=SaveInCookies&N=4294901656
Try these
http://slideme.org/mobile_apps_latest
http://www.mobihand.com/platformMain.asp?platform=13
I Posted mobihand.com on androidcommunity.com but i just found this slideme.org one. on mobihand.com you have to pay for some but theres free ones too like NetScramble v1.2. I'll put that in attachments
i had to put it in zip cuz they don't allow .apk files to be uploaded
you can also take a look of Android Freeware
Great link, baksanir! Thanks!
Again, beware of sites that:
* contain software older than 23 October
Software not updated for Android 1.0 could harm your phone
* do not say who submitted the software or link back to them
I'd want software submitted by the developer, with a link to check version information.
* do not test the software they peddle, especially if money is involved
If a site can't guarantee that software will run on my phone and not harm it, I don't want it.
No 3rd party site has a kill switch
Like people have been saying since before this platform was released, with the open nature of the development structure, the door is wide open. Make sure you're standing in it with a gun.
Just re-injecting some caveat-emptor common sense.
Check and bookmark the FIRST directory of Android Freeware!
beartard, what a nice bunch of tips! Here are my comments:
beartard said:
Again, beware of sites that:
* contain software older than 23 October
Software not updated for Android 1.0 could harm your phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right! Those, which were compiled with old SDKs are not compatible in most of the cases with the one and only device We are going to recompile where possible our whole collection and believe me it's a pain in the butt
beartard said:
* do not say who submitted the software or link back to them
I'd want software submitted by the developer, with a link to check version information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not entirely agree with that. Developers are mega lazy to submit their software other than their homepages. I would recommend to check the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service at first. A reputable site should always have it.
beartard said:
* do not test the software they peddle, especially if money is involved
If a site can't guarantee that software will run on my phone and not harm it, I don't want it.
No 3rd party site has a kill switch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Normally you pay money if the app saves you much more money by making you much more productive. To be honest, as for now there are not much apps of that kind for Android. So better tryout some free stuff.
beartard said:
Like people have been saying since before this platform was released, with the open nature of the development structure, the door is wide open. Make sure you're standing in it with a gun.
Just re-injecting some caveat-emptor common sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, take better a bazooka All curious users will need to try and fail before they find their "golden set of apps" and then stick to them. It's nice to have forums like that where they can exchange experiences and recommend stuff to each other.
sfdteam said:
Check and bookmark the FIRST directory of Android Freeware!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be careful with this site, it contains some older apps. One of them messed up my phone and I had to do a factory reset. Every time I was at the home screen one of the Android processes kept crashing. Pretty easy to fix but reinstalling all of my apps was a bit of a pain.
nick_karstedt said:
Be careful with this site, it contains some older apps. One of them messed up my phone and I had to do a factory reset. Every time I was at the home screen one of the Android processes kept crashing. Pretty easy to fix but reinstalling all of my apps was a bit of a pain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Nick, what was this application exactly, which crashed so badly your phone?
sfdteam said:
beartard, what a nice bunch of tips! Here are my comments:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the comments. Please don't think I was trashing your site (or any other one in particular). I'm just a "consumer advocate" when it comes to things like this.
I think it was one of the file managers, but I'm not sure. I installed quite a few apps and it started acting up a bit later.
nick_karstedt said:
I think it was one of the file managers, but I'm not sure. I installed quite a few apps and it started acting up a bit later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nick, are you sure about that? There are 4 file managers on the site:
Manage 1.2
Android File Browser 2.0
Android File Browser 1.0.0
File System Explorer
None of them should you be able to install on your G1, because:
All four apps were compiled with old compilers, contained in old SDK releases of Android OS. Old .apk packages are mostly not compatible with T-Mobile G1's Dalvik, which uses new APIs supplies with the latest SDK version 1.0.
All four apps were NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. G1's security policy doesn't permit unsigned apps to be installed on the device.
So your accusations that apps from our site screwed your phone look very suspicious to me. Especially that in the same thread you hail the link of Mr. Veselin Nedev (aka Veselin Nedeff, baksanir), whose site blatantly copy-pastes content from our site and hotlinks to our .APK files. So, whether you go from their site or ours you come to the same files, which are served by our server. How it can be then that only apps from our site damage your phone?
Anyway, I'll double check those 4 apps to find the true.
Update: after our notification baksanir removed the hotlinks to our site and changed descriptions of the apps.
Related
Dearest Trinity users,
I've taken the liberty of uploading all the current ROMs onto RapidShare for our downloading pleasure. I've also updated the wiki with links to all the new locations so that when the files are removed from the XDA hosted FTP we'll still have a place to get a hold of the files. I believe this will be the easiest, quickest method as opposed to using Torrents. That way we don't need any extra software to download the files and no seeders will be needed, either. If the links to these files will ever be required to be removed from the wiki along with the FTP files, I still have the full list of download locations so we can move the info onto any page we would need in the future.
Thanks
prsnow said:
Dearest Trinity users,
I've taken the liberty of uploading all the current ROMs onto RapidShare for our downloading pleasure. I've also updated the wiki with links to all the new locations so that when the files are removed from the XDA hosted FTP we'll still have a place to get a hold of the files. I believe this will be the easiest, quickest method as opposed to using Torrents. That way we don't need any extra software to download the files and no seeders will be needed, either. If the links to these files will ever be required to be removed from the wiki along with the FTP files, I still have the full list of download locations so we can move the info onto any page we would need in the future.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems like a good idea
Good idea. And actually a great counterblow against the Microsoft's hostile plans to limit the availability of ROMs.
Maybe they will next to try close whole internet because there _MAY_BE_ some software available that hurts Microsoft's business..
jantsuh said:
Maybe they will next to try close whole internet because there _MAY_BE_ some software available that hurts Microsoft's business..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But that would be perfectly reasonable. The thing is that no-one is hurting Microsoft's business making those ROMs available. Quite the opposite: this site and those unofficial ROMs have contributed to the success of Windows Mobile.
But to be honest in this case I think that Microsoft is acting to please the companies that license Windows Mobile (i.e. the network operators) more than themselves. The network operators don't like sites where you can learn how to unlock phones and replace their branded software and it's easy to understand why.
Great!!
anonimo said:
But that would be perfectly reasonable. The thing is that no-one is hurting Microsoft's business making those ROMs available. Quite the opposite: this site and those unofficial ROMs have contributed to the success of Windows Mobile.
But to be honest in this case I think that Microsoft is acting to please the companies that license Windows Mobile (i.e. the network operators) more than themselves. The network operators don't like sites where you can learn how to unlock phones and replace their branded software and it's easy to understand why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very well thought out and well spoken.
But no worries, just means we have a couple more hoops to jump through.
Why not share them in a filesharing network (emule, torrent, etc)?
Then, it would be a real "community project" and it would be not so easy to bring them down...
All files should contain "xda-dev" so they could be easy to find.
Just my 2 cents
ReflexNPG said:
Why not share them in a filesharing network (emule, torrent, etc)?
Then, it would be a real "community project" and it would be not so easy to bring them down...
All files should contain "xda-dev" so they could be easy to find.
Just my 2 cents
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep that's true also. I'm open for plenty of other options besides RapidShare. I'm thinking of RapidShare as more of a temporary solution while XDA is forced to start deleting all the ROMs from their FTP server.
All of my last 5 phones have ram Windows Mobile of some ilke. But I have never received any updates when using the updater. Does it actually work ?
Yes, it does work, but it's (mostly) not for you. It's primarily in use by the Microsoft development and testing teams: they receive their 'nightly build'-style updates as the OS is developed.
Your carrier has the ability to provide updates to your phone as well- but most (almost all) choose not to devote the time/energy to setting these up. After all, if your phone doesn't work, you'll just buy another of their phones.
Pretty much what ktemkin said.
It's up to your carrier, and no carriers care to update broken ass windows mobile phones.
If they updatre all they'll do is roll out a new Rom for your device and tell you to flash that.
Cool, thanks. O2 have a new ROM out but did wonder about that app.
I'll delete it now.
Thanks
AFAIK, removing the UPDATER components may break dependencies that are present in other SYS components.
Here's is some background information regarding Windows Updater:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=520009
HTH,
The shortcut I meant to say.
nevermind , nevrmind
Give him a break, he's probably posting off his phone in a second language.
You can read Da_G's thread on the updater in the raph rom forum or in dev & hacking. He got it to work.
sjm.c said:
learn how to spell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's hope that the next time a typo occurs in your content that folks will be more polite about it.
Totally uncalled for.
Check these posts out:
http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/n...ndows-update-work-on-their-mobile-device.html [there is a response from an MSFT person]
http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/n...serious-about-windows-update-for-devices.html
Reminds me of something... But I cant put my finger on it
Mod Edit: Links removed - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=4745624&postcount=8
Its skinned to remove all logos, The only thing I could not remove was the text. I made it for myself, keep that in mind. I am just sharing.
*edit* if the original does not work, I doubt this one will but use the same install information 555-555-5555 and you must have the widget on your home screen. Launch it from the widget preferably.
is there anything different about these apks? Are they wifi compatible?
I tried wifi compatibility and it is still in the works but as of now this is only for looks but I am working on wifi as I post this.
555-555-5555?? call that number while the widget is up?
On some of the sprint apps it makes you comfirm that you are a sprint customer, so instead of sending sprint our real phone numbers (caller id=your name) we send them fake ones, like 555-555-5555
this seems like not a smart thing for you to do.
DemoShadow said:
Reminds me of something... But I cant put my finger on it
Mod Edit: Links removed - http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...24&postcount=8
Its skinned to remove all logos, The only thing I could not remove was the text. I made it for myself, keep that in mind. I am just sharing.
*edit* if the original does not work, I doubt this one will but use the same install information 555-555-5555 and you must have the widget on your home screen. Launch it from the widget preferably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so basically you just violated alot of copyright laws....
Unfortunately, some may think, we cannot allow links to modded paying software. The software in question is provided under licence to Sprint users only. Now, we try not to sensor knowledge here, so we not going to delete all references to the fact that this software can be ported to non Sprint devices and used free of charge in breach of terms and conditions, BUT we cannot permit links to the software that would actively encourage members to break the law.
Mike
Links will be removed
It's not the fact that it is Sprint software ported over to the G1. It is the fact that he removed all of Sprint's branding. That's like taking the the Google Maps app (or any Google app) and removing Google's name from it. It's simply just a breach of copyright.
tekkitan said:
It's not the fact that it is Sprint software ported over to the G1. It is the fact that he removed all of Sprint's branding. That's like taking the the Google Maps app (or any Google app) and removing Google's name from it. It's simply just a breach of copyright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that too but the whole subject of the Sprint / Telnav software has been raised and discussed with Mods and Admin so there are issues regarding the use of such software on non Sprint phones.
Mike
Wow. Mike you have got to be one of the fairest, most logical forum mods I have ever had the pleasure to read. I am very impressed with the way in which this was handled.
mike i thought your site got closed because u had all the htc breakdown videos and what of that? but i do understand the point so i say lets make a new site that will let you post or upload. that way we can get the goods and xda dont get the blame if i remeber november 27 windows came down on xda for the same ish so please pleas dont let it happen to android just look for a new method for the shares. but i do like the work and want the app i was to late late for the link !!!!! Thanx mike !!!!!
*edit*( november 2007 )
llxll0m3g4llxll said:
mike i thought your site got closed because u had all the htc breakdown videos and what of that? but i do understand the point so i say lets make a new site that will let you post or upload. that way we can get the goods and xda dont get the blame if i remeber november 27 windows came down on xda for the same ish so please pleas dont let it happen to android just look for a new method for the shares. but i do like the work and want the app i was to late late for the link !!!!! Thanx mike !!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was shut down for a while and had to remove some things, but in the end reached a sort of unofficial compromise on intellectual property rights.
This is a delicate issue, in my case I don't offer folks something they would normally have to pay for through their network or otherwise. (I offer stuff they should not have, even if they have money to pay for it!!).
I guess our bottom line is that knowledge should be freely available, but handing folk the tools, to install stuff that is very close to being Warez, is off-limits. (Robbing banks with an uzi can be profitable = knowledge, but handing out uzis and suggesting you rob a bank, crosses the line)
.... and yes we know cooking ROMs and such is also a grey area, but even there we say that ROMs should not be cooked that include for free any software for which the user would normally have to pay.
If someone set up a site with Sprint software on it - that's entirely up to them. We would probably even accept a link to it if the poster said "hey here's a breakdown of a Sprint ROM" In fact that would probably be OK to post here - at least until someone asked for a "take-down"
The problem only comes when someone says you can load this stuff on non-Sprint phones and get stuff for free and just to help you do that here are the links. In other words that ceases to be a theoretical point of information and becomes an encouragement to do something naughty. If folks want t be naughty then they have to do so, by reading the knowledge and then looking for the tools from whatever source, here or elsewhere without our help.
These kinds of things have been debated many times here at XDA - there are no absolute rights and wrongs, only things we think are more or less safe for us to do - just like life generally I guess
Mike
mikechannon said:
These kinds of things have been debated many times here at XDA - there are no absolute rights and wrongs, only things we think are more or less safe for us to do - just like life generally I guess
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said Mike. When I read it, I had a /foreheadslap moment thinking, "well duh, this should be pretty obvious," but im constantly reminded that there are users on here who simply feel they have a right or deserve to have any given piece of software if it is leaked online.
The bottom line is, do not post software that has not been explicity licensed as open source unless you have obtained permission to redistribute. As a general rule of thumb, if the software cannot be legally obtained unless you pay someone (e.g. it comes preloaded on a phone) or can be obtained free but only if you agree to a license agreement (downloading certain software update packages) then you should not redistribute it on xda or elsewhere.
As Swype is only available as a closed beta or as release within an OEM build, it should not be posted, or linked on XDA.
I'm the beta community relations rep for Swype (Brian Resnik, if you're over on the Swype forums).
First of all, yes we're watching you HAHA. I'm obligated to wag my finger at you all for distributing our software without a license. A little patience will go a long way. Trust me, the more the brass hears about people illegally copying Swype and feeling entitled to a free version (yes, we know there's no copy on the market for you to buy, but you have to respect that OEM distribution is our chosen business model), the less they want to support a beta program at all. The better we play nice with eachother, the sooner more people get into the beta!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya might want to look in the Nexus One application forum...
Carloswithac said:
Ya might want to look in the Nexus One application forum...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup, it was posted there first
@mssmison
But you know... I will buy Swype first day it will be released - thanks to these leaks
Swype has updated their page with the new beta instructions. It appears at this point to be a limited public beta, as it will only be available for a couple of days, and requires you to enter your email address to get the download.
So threads with download links will still not be allowed.
Get the info here; http://beta.swype.com/
mssmison said:
Swype has updated their page with the new beta instructions. It appears at this point to be a limited public beta, as it will only be available for a couple of days, and requires you to enter your email address to get the download.
So threads with download links will still not be allowed.
Get the info here; http://beta.swype.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's really hard to find, that you have edited your post after several hours from adding it
Swype
just go to swype's page and get it. It is working fine on my G1 with SuperCSDI rom.
h t t p://beta.swype.com
I don't see why they have to hate =[
Need the .apk.
Dont want to register my email. Get enuff junk already. Where can we download the .apk? Post it please.
is XDA commercial now?
I gave swype my email and got the .apk from them.
Izord said:
Dont want to register my email. Get enuff junk already. Where can we download the .apk? Post it please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do realize that the whole point of this thread is to say not to post the APK, right?
When they take off the stupid download limit for the Beta for registered testers, I'll actually support not posting links.
FirstNoobToBrickHisPhone said:
When they take off the stupid download limit for the Beta for registered testers, I'll actually support not posting links.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean? You can't download it several times?
Brut.all said:
What do you mean? You can't download it several times?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've downloaded mine many times (4 or 5) due to flashing the phone over and over testing things
Nieylana said:
I've downloaded mine many times (4 or 5) due to flashing the phone over and over testing things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I understand. I just wanted to know whether I should not download it too many times, but backup&install it instead.
Gents,
I think Ive abused my swype membership --- ive installed it maybe at least 30 times on two phones since March. I've lost the "swype" function and it is basically a nice blue HTC_IME standin. No complaints, but wheres the swype at on Swype?
Droid X comes with it stock. Beautiful app. I might have known someone (a friend of course) who hooked his friends up with Swype on their HTC Eris's. He told me that he went and Googled it and found it pretty quick.
Swype.apk
mssmison said:
As Swype is only available as a closed beta or as release within an OEM build, it should not be posted, or linked on XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand that you have chosen a particular business model. I think however that it is unfair that it is not sold via the Android Market. What about phones like the Nexus One which now is an official developers phone? The Nexus One did not come with Swype and I would like to have the option to use it. (And yes, I did sign up at swypeinc's website waiting for the beta to reopen) Unless you give people the chance to purchase your product people will find ways around your chosen business model. I haven't myself downloaded the apk and I agree xdadevelopers should heed your warning.
I'm not really sure what the hang up is for the swype "brass." This program is being released on select phones already, right? Plus I've never heard complaints about it and would love to try it too. I'd gladly pay for something like this (after a trial) so I'm not really sure what the deal is.
Most of us love new software to play with and improve our phones with. However, a big turn-off for us can also be controlling companies like this. If they don't start providing us a valid route to buy or at least use this product, then they're going to lose in the end. The community is large enough we can throw together our own program to do this crap. Hell, shapewriter keyboard already does this and is free to boot and since I can't even use swype, it might as well not exist in the realm of gesture-based keyboards as far as I'm personally concerned.
I must concur with the rest of the community when I say that choosing not to retail a highly requested, fully functional app shows that the Swype folks are off their rockers. However, if they don't want us to obtain their app and lose customers as a result, that is their prerogative. I'm sure most of us will just find the APKs elsewhere online.
I did copy this from the Epic 4G forums...EVERYONE SHOULD READ!!! And DEVS maybe implement the fix in future ROMS. NOTHING IS ATTACHED TO THIS POST!! SEE OP FOR ALL INFO!! ---->http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=977154
Who is affected? All phones pre-gingerbread
Who should act? Users and developers using pre-gingerbread roms
How do I fix? Flash attached .zip at the bottom of this post or use one of the alternate methods down there
What if I think I was infected? Completely wipe your device, format sdard, go back to stock and re-apply rom, then flash the attached .zip (before installing any apps)
Why should I care? read below...
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/03...open-backdoor/
Link to publishers apps here. I just randomly stumbled into one of the apps, recognized it and noticed that the publisher wasn’t who it was supposed to be.
Super Guitar Solo for example is originally Guitar Solo Lite. I downloaded two of the apps and extracted the APK’s, they both contain what seems to be the "rageagainstthecage" root exploit – binary contains string "CVE-2010-EASY Android local root exploit (C) 2010 by 743C". Don’t know what the apps actually do, but can’t be good.
I appreciate being able to publish an update to an app and the update going live instantly, but this is a bit scary. Some sort of moderation, or at least quicker reaction to malware complaints would be nice.
EDIT: After some dexing and jaxing, the apps seem to be at least posting the IMEI and IMSI codes to http://184.105.245.17:8080/GMServer/GMServlet, which seems to be located in Fremont, CA.
I asked our resident hacker to take a look at the code himself, and he’s verified it does indeed root the user’s device via rageagainstthecage or exploid. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg: it does more than just yank IMEI and IMSI. There’s another APK hidden inside the code, and it steals nearly everything it can: product ID, model, partner (provider?), language, country, and userID. But that’s all child’s play; the true pièce de résistance is that it has the ability to download more code. In other words, there’s no way to know what the app does after it’s installed, and the possibilities are nearly endless.
The offending apps from publisher Myournet:
* Falling Down
* Super Guitar Solo
* Super History Eraser
* Photo Editor
* Super Ringtone Maker
* Super Sex Positions
* Hot Sexy Videos
* Chess
* 下坠滚球_Falldown
* Hilton Sex Sound
* Screaming Sexy Japanese Girls
* Falling Ball Dodge
* Scientific Calculator
* Dice Roller
* 躲避弹球
* Advanced Currency Converter
* App Uninstaller
* 几何战机_PewPew
* Funny Paint
* Spider Man
* 蜘蛛侠
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/03...-more-details/
Now, on to some more details of the virus. We should point out that this vulnerability was patched with Gingerbread, meaning any device running Android 2.3+ should be fine. In other words, if you’re looking to play the blame game (which I’m not, but having read all the comments on the original post, many people are), then there’s plenty to go around. The hole was fixed by Google, but it’s relatively useless since many phones aren’t yet running a version of Android that is protected. It’s noteworthy that some manufacturers released updates that patched the exploit for devices without updating to Gingerbread; unfortunately, it appears that minority is quite a small one.
Perhaps most important is the question of what infected users can do about their situation; unfortunately, the answer is not much of anything. Because the virus opens up a backdoor and can bring in new code at any time, the only way to really rid an infected device of any damage is to completely wipe the device – not exactly the optimal solution, but it looks like the only one available, at least for now.
Finally, Justin notes that ROM developers working with pre-Gingerbread versions of Android can prevent the virus from backdooring in code by putting a dummy file at /system/bin/profile.
As you can see androidpolice.com reports on this backdoor and roots and steals personal information. The apps are removed from the market but that doesn't mean they got them all. Attached is a flashable fix as suggested by androidpolice.com
So users can flash this .zip or simply create a blank file called profile and place it in /system/bin/ (developers are encouraged to include this file in future releases. A blank file is not going to affect performance at all)
Alternate methods:
Using 'adb shell' or terminal emulator (should work on any phone) as suggest by xaueious here
Code:
$ su
su
# remount rw
Remounting /system (/dev/stl9) in read/write mode
# touch /system/bin/profile
# chmod 644 /system/bin/profile
#
Alternate 2:
Download blank profile file from here (or create one and name it profile)
Use a program like Root Explorer to copy it to /system/bin/
Then longpress on it and check the permissions should be read/write for user, read for group, and read for others.
Alternate 3:
cyansmoker has put together an apk for the patch here https://market.android.com/details?id=com.voilaweb.mobile.droiddreamkiller
Thanks for pointing this out photoframd and androidpolice.com for investigating and reporting!
UPDATE: I renamed the .zip file and reuploaded it (350 hits wow). Also in the edify scripted version I added 644 permissions to the file (but if you already flashed it then it should have defaulted to that). I also added a pre-edify version of the patch thanks to xaueious for people using a recovery that does not yet understand edify.
Jeeze 200+ views and no thanks?
I don't think people know what to say. Thanks
[Q] What is edify?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=977886
This topic (malware patch) should be sticky... (Or at the least a link to the original thread)
Thanks for the info. Although the Screaming Sexy Japanese Girls app did look intriguing I stayed away from it. LOL. But, for real, I did use the link to inform a few people (like my wife) because there are a few apps that look like they could have looked more legitimate.
is this a must even if you know the apps that are infected?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
...prevent the virus from backdooring in code by putting a dummy file at /system/bin/profile
How would that do anything? If it wasn't there before the virus...how...does that tell the virus to stop?
....Could that be the key to unlock the virus itself?
So pretty much I stay away from dl'ing japanese smut apps and I should be okay, lol. Honestly if you're that much of a perv where you need porn on your phone, you deserve to be attacked with something. Maybe those people should consider getting a girlfriend and/or therapy cause they just contracted app HIV!
Good info to know nonetheless though...
Sent from my Vibrant w/ Bionix V 1.3.1, Overstock, and Launcher Pro Plus
Thanks for posting this!!!
One question- is it correct to assume that the presence of /system/bin/profile is an indicator that the device is already infected? Or is that simply a block to prevent the exploit from working in the future?
[email protected] * Super sex positions.
anyways thanks for the heads up lightning
daenigma said:
[Q] What is edify?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=977886
This topic (malware patch) should be sticky... (Or at the least a link to the original thread)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edify means to make aware of or to enlighten one of new information or meaning.
To the OP Thanks.........
lightninbug said:
...which seems to be located in Fremont, CA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? That's next door to me. I wonder which business...
OH NO, I think I may have downloaded the photo editor app, im not sure though, but when I opened the app it never loaded. I really hope this wasnt the app that im talking about.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
You have got to be kidding me.... a week or two ago I reported that developer to Google numerous times for publishing stolen apps (e.g. pew pew) and inappropriate content. And now look, it turns out they were trojans. Google has to do something about these ****ers spamming the market with pirated and otherwise useless/distasteful/malicious content. I'm getting so sick of seeing the "latest apps" category littered by scum. It's unfair to legitimate indie developers who need all they exposure they can get.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
It is just as easy to not install untrusted apps. People who just download random apps and install them deserve this. Perhaps this little incident will be a wake up call to everyone to make sure they only install trusted software. I say this security flaw is a feature for weeding out the idiots.
http://m.ft.com/cms/s/2/bf3d6002-452e-11e0-80e7-00144feab49a.html
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
only app I would have downloaded from that list is "chess" and I didn't. looks like I'm CLEAR. WHOOPDEEDOO for being careful about what to install.
Thanks for the info!
Broken hearts and broken noses since 1973!
jnutz said:
It is just as easy to not install untrusted apps. People who just download random apps and install them deserve this. Perhaps this little incident will be a wake up call to everyone to make sure they only install trusted software. I say this security flaw is a feature for weeding out the idiots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How would an average user know whether these apps are "trusted" (your terminology) if they were on the market? By being on the market, there is an implicit understanding that they are "trusted". Maybe you are the idiot? Do you not understand the issue here?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App