Database Develop

What is your OC result?

What is your stable OC frequency?
I'm curious, because we can see kernels supporting up to 1600Mhz and in other hand I can see my device not working on 1200Mhz

i have been running @ 1.4ghz stable but no luck with 1500 and 1600...

I've been running at 1.6GHz on the Captivate for the past 2 weeks.
voltages are 50/50/0/50/0/0/0/50/50/0/0/0/0/0.
StabilityTest completed 36 passes, reaching a max temp of 42C and receiving 0 errors. Using Setiron's SuperOptomized 1.5.4 XT Kernel / personal JK3 build.
Battery life is better than expected, but could use some improvement! But, running .6GHz faster than the specified frequency, I guess i have no room to talk.

i dont overclock, find it too unstable

This isn't dev...

XAN for me with laststufo stable at 1.3Ghz max OC with -175mV or -200mV

1200mhz only can work for me within 10 minutes before it freezes
1120mhz works perfect

1.2Ghz stable using Trasig's Advanced Voodoo 5.

where is raspdeep? will there be anymore oc kernel from him?

where can I find Setiron's kernel please?

international SGS I9000 16gb version
currently stable @ 1.4Mhz working on darkys latest rom with SO latest 4_5_1
pretty stable and fast, best experiance with the deadline scheduler, jfs+ext2 binds on Lagfix
best setup till now with quadrant scores not below 2100 (usually 2300-2500)
1.5 is possible but not as stable as 1.4 and 1.6 is impossible
current Voltage settings are: -175 -175 -175 -175 -25 -25 -50 -50 -50 -50 -75 -75 -75 with 1.4 set on boot
noticed a stutter like lag every 1 sec interval with any voltage above -175 on 1.4Mhz

hmm...
mazroui said:
international SGS I9000 16gb version
currently stable @ 1.4Mhz working on darkys latest rom with SO latest 4_5_1
pretty stable and fast, best experiance with the deadline scheduler, jfs+ext2 binds on Lagfix
best setup till now with quadrant scores not below 2100 (usually 2300-2500)
1.5 is possible but not as stable as 1.4 and 1.6 is impossible
current Voltage settings are: -175 -175 -175 -175 -25 -25 -50 -50 -50 -50 -75 -75 -75 with 1.4 set on boot
noticed a stutter like lag every 1 sec interval with any voltage above -175 on 1.4Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any luck with 1.5??
ive manged to run linpack on 1.5ghz got 24.69 lol
1500mhz -125mv with deadline scheduler... freezes on quadrant or if opened any app...
1.4 is rock stable!!!

nanu_x2 said:
any luck with 1.5??
ive manged to run linpack on 1.5ghz got 24.69 lol
1500mhz -125mv with deadline scheduler... freezes on quadrant or if opened any app...
1.4 is rock stable!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here linpack works on 1.5 but unfortunately not stable for daily use (scored 22.something-Avg of 3 tests)
quadrant gets to I/O and freeze there @ 1.5
simply stick with 1.4 since the phone is happy with it, unless theres more work done for the other freqs regarding stability, im sure we'll get there since long back 1.4 was available but totally not stable and now its working flawlessly, just keep an eye out ^_^
BIG thanks goes to all the devs working on all the lagfixes/OCing/Stability/Kernals/Roms etc etc etc.....

But, how are guys undervolting? Thats the issue right?

betoNL said:
But, how are guys undervolting? Thats the issue right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XAN's voltage app , check it out in the dev section

I know...I meant which UV values according (stability, etc)
I can OV no probs, but undervolting is tricky

Nice OC results ppl!
I'll post mine...

1.6Ghz on the Captivate is for real ? I heard its not even performing any faster than a 1Ghz international SGS.

That's right.....I think all this overclocking is irrelevant.
Finding the right balance between overclocking and undervolting, keeping system stable with good battery performance, that's the thing
Comparing OC and benchmarks, is kinda childish really:
http://androidspin.com/2010/08/23/my-quadrant-is-bigger-than-your-quadrant/

betoNL said:
That's right.....I think all this overclocking is irrelevant.
Finding the right balance between overclocking and undervolting, keeping system stable with good battery performance, that's the thing
Comparing OC and benchmarks, is kinda childish really:
http://androidspin.com/2010/08/23/my-quadrant-is-bigger-than-your-quadrant/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Talk about FUN POLICE!!

[POLL] Overclocking, How far does you galaxy Go and S stay stable? without rebooting

How far is your Galaxy s stable?
mine just hits the 1.1GHZ, beyond that only crashes no matter which voltage i Use. please Use the poll so we have a good picture of what the average galaxy s is capable of..
also comment which version of SGS you are using and 8gb/ 16 Gb etc..

i9000m
PS this thread should be moved to General

had mine at 1.54ghz running MIUI with tk glitch kernel.
was amazingly fast, but my phone got hot quick, i dont like OC'ing i feel it may do more harm than good in the long run.
others may and will disagree but thats my opinion on it

Mine with 1.3GHz OC and some Undervolt is perfectly stable.....

simone201 said:
Mine with 1.3GHz OC and some Undervolt is perfectly stable.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with the chef ...
Although I can overclock to 1540MHz it does get hot and Im sure it will do damage in time ..
1300MHz is a great overclock ...
It will be interesting to see what my SGS 2 can be safely overclocked to

1.2 GHz seems ok for me - with UV
Doesn't really get hot.

Running mine @ 1440 MHz with MIUI but i think I can go higher if I want . I have the 8 GB version

1.3 and very stable and with great performance both q score caffiene mark and in daily use

Which voltage are you using?
Mine seems to freeze on voltages above the 1.3V,
above the 1.2 GHZ always freezes. I,m using darkeys 9.5 Rom.
someone some advice which rom is the best for OC, (just for benchmarking) for once.
rixsta said:
Agree with the chef ...
Although I can overclock to 1540MHz it does get hot and Im sure it will do damage in time ..
1300MHz is a great overclock ...
It will be interesting to see what my SGS 2 can be safely overclocked to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Mine can handle up to 1.3-1.4ghz

Im getting stable speeds of 1.7ghz. Im on watercooling though..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

1.4ghz is my max for full stability. 1.5ghz works fine (no reboots), but the CPU occasionally gives an invalid result during calculations, e.g. during benchmarks like linpack, results can sometimes be inaccurate; 1.44ghz also seemed to work, but I picked 1.4ghz max for longevity/reliability.
UV Values are:
100mhz - 200mV UV (750mV)
200mhz - 150mV UV (800mV)
400mhz - 100mV UV (950mV)
800mhz - 75mV UV (1125mV)
1ghz - 50mV UV (1200mV)
1.2ghz - 50mV UV (1300mV)
1.3ghz - 0mv UV (1400mV)
1.4ghz - 50mV UV (1400mV)
Max UV were found by starting from 100mhz Max frequency, decreasing UV until stable for 5 minutes of software decoding of 720p MKV, and then increasing Max frequency one step. Occasionally the previous step UV needed to be decreased by 25mV to obtain a stability at the next frequency step.
i9000M (16GB)

Guys, if you wanna push your phones to their full stability limits- play on Shadow Guardian game...)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

I can run my SGS stable at 1540 MHz with glitch kernel in MIUI 1.5.20 ROM.
Total stability in a 48 hours stress test.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 usando XDA Premium App

Mine is stable at 1.5 Ghz with a 200mv undervolt, but only if I select it as a single frequency.
For multiple frequencies, I was stable at 1.4Ghz on an earlier kernel, but it's slightly unstable now... I'll probably try tweaking the governor.
I'm on a i9000m using tk-glitch's V9D-VC and CM7 #11 build.
By the way, shouldn't this thread be in general?

I am on MIUI v3 and CM7_SGSMTD_platypus-kernel_20110522_r0_quorra-prer11_test4-r2 kernel.
I don't use undervolt settings and 1.2 Ghz is fine for me; above values generally don't work stable.
By the way, 1.2 ghz is almost enough for all games and operations, I did not run into that pushing apps for high oc's.
Regards.

1.44GHz, extremely smooth and stable!

Never seen an option to go above 1.54, but 1.54 works flawlessly so I've chosen 1.5 in the poll. (16gb i9000)

1.3-1.4 GHz tkglitch kernel Miui v3
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

It's not the ROm it's the KERNEL who can oc, i adviise using XAN, hardcore kernels in 2.2. or gto's ginger kernel at 2.3 they are stable and 1280 i guess it's the limit not to warm up
But a questin what send me an undervoltage config, to 1300 if the gpu games work for someone at 1300mhz
.
fstluxe said:
Which voltage are you using?
Mine seems to freeze on voltages above the 1.3V,
above the 1.2 GHZ always freezes. I,m using darkeys 9.5 Rom.
someone some advice which rom is the best for OC, (just for benchmarking) for once.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

[Q] Overcome-Hermes, 1.4GHZ OC stable only when in UV -75mv

I was using stock for my gtab and lately installed Overcome-Hermes.
I noticed that the 1.4ghz oc using setcpu is unstable and often hangs in games especially "Dungeon Defenders" using the default assigned voltage of 1500mv
I played with the voltages for a while and found out that the 1.4ghz OC is stable when i set it at -75mv which is about 1425mv.
Is this normal? Aint the higher clock supposed to require more voltage?
Device does not freeze up, not even once so far, when i undervolt 1.4ghz to 1425mv.

RigelKentL said:
I was using stock for my gtab and lately installed Overcome-Hermes.
I noticed that the 1.4ghz oc using setcpu is unstable and often hangs in games especially "Dungeon Defenders" using the default assigned voltage of 1500mv
I played with the voltages for a while and found out that the 1.4ghz OC is stable when i set it at -75mv which is about 1425mv.
Is this normal? Aint the higher clock supposed to require more voltage?
Device does not freeze up, not even once so far, when i undervolt 1.4ghz to 1425mv.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think its normal since it states here: http://overcome.mimzo.com/?page_id=68
"THOUGH FOR HERMES, BEST STABLE SETTINGS SO FAR: -100mV AND BELOW."

RigelKentL said:
I played with the voltages for a while and found out that the 1.4ghz OC is stable when i set it at -75mv which is about 1425mv.
Is this normal? Aint the higher clock supposed to require more voltage?
Device does not freeze up, not even once so far, when i undervolt 1.4ghz to 1425mv.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My experience with gingerbread UV/OC states that the higher the OC the lower the UV. However, seems that some UV is necessary for OC; especially for 1.4Ghz.
My setting for that frequency is the same; -75Mv and seems stable for a couple of days.
And yes and no, although higher frequencies need more power higher voltage is not a must.
Last note and 2 cents; if it is stable do not bother )

Something is not right here, with Froyo I had -200mV at all speeds - stable withouth problems, but with GB and -100mV the tab already unstable at higher speeds...

[Q] desire hd safe overclock?

while i was searching the internet i came across to that...
http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3468&idPhone2=4027
(SCROLL TO FEATURES)
http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3468&idPhone2=4161
(SCROLL TO FEATURES)
these phones uses the same processor but on different frequencies.
so my question is: is it safe to use daily the cpu at 1.5ghz of DHD ?

Some phones can handle a higher o/c than others. I've been running mine at 1.2ghz for months now with no issues. I can increase that but I've never felt the need, although many others do ;-)

Yeah, i think 1.5ghz wouldnt be any problem for most/all devices.
With my Milestone back then, which had 550 mhz, i personally was running between 800-1000 mhz, alot others were running even 1200 mhz there.
But on DHD; i personally would do (max!) 1.2 or 1.3 ghz, because this is absolutely enough for most Roms to be smooth.

Darkseth said:
Yeah, i think 1.5ghz wouldnt be any problem for most/all devices.
With my Milestone back then, which had 550 mhz, i personally was running between 800-1000 mhz, alot others were running even 1200 mhz there.
But on DHD; i personally would do (max!) 1.2 or 1.3 ghz, because this is absolutely enough for most Roms to be smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the max i overclock for daily basis is 1.2Ghz but when i tried 1.8Ghz back when lee released his nutter kernel my phone froze.
But i did read somewhere the cpu can be overclocked to 1.5Ghz without any issues but over that people do get some problems.

No!
Using any CPU frequency that is not default ( underclocked or overclocked ) requires testing and manipulating the various variables. The CPU needs to be in sync with the GPU and the other parameters. Needs modifications in the kernel itself. The device is not made to run at those frequencies. You will burn your device, sooner or later.

[Q] Is LiveOC just crap?

Anyone else found this?
I was on CM7.2 with Glitch 13.1 and was able to OC safely to 1.7Ghz STABLE!!! And further more I NEVER had to touch the voltages.
But now I'm on CM9.1 with Devil3 1.4.1 I cannot OC past go 1.2Ghz with LiveOC at 110% giving me a determined CPU clock of 1.3 and a bit Ghz, if you push LiveOC to 111% at 1.2Ghz it reboots and you have to clear NSTool Settings from recovery.
Is it just me or is LiveOC a much poorer idea then the methods for overclocking used by Gingerbread...? Should I try Glitch v14 Beta 6? Even though it looks as though the Glitch kernel project has been abandoned :'(
This is just leaving me with a very s**t taste in my mouth as I was looking forward to Ice Cream Sandwich... anyone else having this issue?

You have to increase the voltages. When you set 120%liveOC, 1000Mhz are now 1200Mhz and you should set the same voltage for it as you get automatically on 1200Mhz normal OC. And you should mind that liveOC doesn't only OC the CPU, so it makes your device faster than normal OC, but it's more unstable. The maximum liveOC you can get are 130%, most users can't put in more than 120%.

Thank you dark_knight35, I will have yet another look at the LiveOC guides kicking about (Glitch's one for example) and see if I can make more sense of it.
But what you say about the voltages on a step after LiveOC is truer than true... can't believe I didn't see it! But I was getting proper annoyed :/
Do you (or anyone) know if there is a kernel out there for ICS that doesn't use LiveOC? And instead just OC's the CPU and or GPU like Glitch 13.1 did for CM7?
Again, thank you