Database Develop

My Own LG 2x GLbenchmark VS Exynos

i only bought the lg 2x for 3 weeks, and this is sad to watch.
However, i don't see the point of the gpu being such powerful, since android does not have any thing to push the gpu at all besides benchmark. This is a good way to make myself feel better.
I would like to know is there difference between Tegra 2 cpu vs Exynos cpu at all?? besides Exynos gpu being so much more powerful than Tegra 2?
Thanks
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

oh thats just terrible
Now my O2x are completely useless - it will just stop functioning im sure
No wait - thats not right - whats happening, it still works ? My games still play, I can still read the news, I can still do all the things I did yesterday.
It's just a benchmark - does it really matter that much ?

Those are just numbers in my opinion.
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App

I might have wrong, but that benchmark is made for mobile gpus and tegra 2 is not like normal mobile gpus it's more like a desktop gpu. A eight core gpu can't be beaten by a quad core or?

Tegra is our one, probably futile, hope of future proofing our phones.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

Don't expect Tegra to lead benchmarks for a while until mobile graphics are more geared towards immediate mode rendering (Stuff more like PC graphics.). Everyone else uses Tile-based rendering. I believe NVidia did this to avoid changing the rendering (which changes the drivers even more and etc) once they reach "console-level" graphics. The Tegra 2 will excel in a few things. Don't expect it to be the best performer for now. Expect it to be a capable one.

Don't forget. SGS II is capped to 60fps and we won't know what it's truly capable of

I've seen several gaming videos and the tegra walks all over the Orion. I do agree that push for tegras are the last hope for a unified gaming platform and I think it will work. Nvidia has this backed and will see it through.

i am really sick of the fact every android phone has its own different games on each platform. same game cant be run on different android phones. this is stupid.
its one of the reasons i like Nvidia. they are trying to do something good here for once. you see all those samsung galaxy S2 hardware. but where all the games ? those same games i can play on nexus S. with good frames too. however with nvidia and tegra 2, the users are getting exclusive games that can take advantage of the hardware. thats nice for a change.
let the galaxy S2 owners have fun with there powerful phone on paper. at the end of the day. the Tegra 2 owners are the people who are getting the best looking games.
i am not saying i hate S2. because i will buy it as soon as i can. i love super amoled and the techs for the phone. but if i want a pure gaming phone. tegra 2 wins hands down. not because its the most powerful. but because there are exclusive games that take advantage of that GPU.

wrong thread...........

ll_l_x_l_ll said:
ithe reasons i like Nvidia. they are trying to do something good here for once.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No their not, they're taking games already under development which Android users were going to see anyway regardless of nvidia's involvement and paying the developers off to make them exclusive titles, this is a bad thing as most Android users will lose out because of it.
One of the Tegra 2 only pinball games once cracked works fine on a legend ffs!

Benchmarks are just numbers. Real life performance is what counts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYkEUOA6Spo

rd_nest said:
Benchmarks are just numbers. Real life performance is what counts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYkEUOA6Spo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are we looking at exactly? Looks like they're both just playing a video

fallout0 said:
What are we looking at exactly? Looks like they're both just playing a video
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this video shows at how the flash player performance is on web browsing watching a video and at this point watching an anime on both phones
so you can see that samsung galaxy with exynos and with 1.2ghz against lg2x nvidia tegra2 with 1ghz and lg optimus 2x seems for me faster for playing videos at this ..!i wanna only know if lg use stock 2.2.2 at this video against samsung galaxy s2 2.3.3 stock

lets compare those two videos and see that there are no differences between samsung s 2 and lg2x
and again dont forget...lg 2x has stock 2.2.2 rom
samsung galaxy s 2 has gingerbread 2.3.3 wich supposed to be faster..
think that when lg 2x will get official ginger 2.3.4 at this summer
gaming comparison
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAFs9OQinNo
web browsing comparison
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO0gSLf73AI

Shocky2 said:
No their not, they're taking games already under development which Android users were going to see anyway regardless of nvidia's involvement and paying the developers off to make them exclusive titles, this is a bad thing as most Android users will lose out because of it.
One of the Tegra 2 only pinball games once cracked works fine on a legend ffs!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, and Nvidia is causing fragmentation by using their own compression formats. Afaik Mali supports the one and only standard format, but that don't help much when Nvidia is paying off devs to use their proprietary stuff. Yeah not very techical i know, but check out the SGS2 thread for more info.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

Wow..IPhone 4S explodes past SGS2 on all benchmarks!

Who'da thunk it? (Wink)
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4951/iphone-4s-preliminary-benchmarks-800mhz-a5-slightly-slower-gpu-than-ipad-2

i think once Android introduces hardware acceleration (ICS??) that from a benchmarking standpoint it should improve. From what i understand of Android and iOS, iOS i think has potential to do better in benchmarking due to being pretty much on the metal where as android is "virtual" to account for all the different hardware sets. Some one smarter feel free to straighten me out!! That said, i don't think you have any one said that the ET4G feels slow!

Depends on iPhone graphics chip too... Not sure how good it is...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium

it's very difficult to compare devices that run different platforms because there can be a lot of variables involved.
android still has a long way to go in terms of fluidity and refinement.
plus, this is what happens when software is designed for only ONE device made by ONE manufacturer as opposed to open-source and multiple devices manufacturers.
still, I don't dislike Apple by any means but nothing could make me get an iPhone 4s....

The iPhone is basically an app drawer.

Nexus Prime comes out soon. That will inevitably put the 4S to shame. As for hardware, I think the 4S is the greatest anticlimax of the year. They've changed a small number of things on the iPhone 4 and put a £400+ price tag on it.
Not to discredit Apple. It's a phenomenal phone but it's only just been released and will very quickly be sunk (again) by Android devices.
Just my two cents of course...
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

AvatarOfFrost said:
it's very difficult to compare devices that run different platforms because there can be a lot of variables involved.
android still has a long way to go in terms of fluidity and refinement.
plus, this is what happens when software is designed for only ONE device made by ONE manufacturer as opposed to open-source and multiple devices manufacturers.
still, I don't dislike Apple by any means but nothing could make me get an iPhone 4s....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

Yes I'm very impressive
Edit not impressed
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

I could care less. I don't even run those on my phone as they don't mean anything to me.

rockky said:
Who'da thunk it? (Wink)
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4951/iphone-4s-preliminary-benchmarks-800mhz-a5-slightly-slower-gpu-than-ipad-2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but did you mistakenly post this trash here in the Epic 4G Touch section? Cause I don't seen anything about your post that relates to this phone.
Damn you guys make me pissy, why can't you keep your crapple stuff where it belongs?
On a side note, it is funny how the image of his thumbs take up 50% of the screen.

Excuse me if I'm wrong, but is that not because of the hardware acceleration (From gpu.. If i make any sense here) because the Galaxy Tab has very high scores, Higher than the reast and close to the iphone in all of them, Honeycomb, unlike gingerbread has Hardware acceleration, so hopefully for ICS those scores will boost

I'm not surprised since iOS is optimized to the max, while Android is still crappy on most hardware. But i guess ICS will fix this.
Btw, the 4S' GPU is the same that will sit in the Nexus Prime (according to rumours).
But whether we like it or not, the 4S is a powerful gadget, and that's great for the iPhone users.

rockky said:
Who'da thunk it? (Wink)
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4951/...rks-800mhz-a5-slightly-slower-gpu-than-ipad-2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thunk it...when I saw the benchmarks I posted about in a different thread.
Apple never does anything frivolously. They may seem to be frivolous at times, but they always have valid reasons for what they do. It's why they prosper. And why they will continue to prosper.

I get a 3600 score on mt htc desire hd with ccm7 rom, overclocked....iphone couldn't even half that....BUT, i returned to a custom sense rom and clocked processor back down to standard speed and i noticed absolutely ZERO difference, it was still 100% as smooth and zero lag etc....BUT, my benchmark was only 1841...a lot less on Quadrant.
Quadrant scores, IMHO (or other benchmark tools) mean F**K ALL!!
my phone is 100% smooth
ZERO lag whatsoever
very fast
reliable
so i really couldn't care if it said (on quadrant benchmark) 100 or 5,000,000!
Matt

I've gotten over 5800 on quadrant on my Nexus S, Simms22 has even broken 6000 (same device) quadrants are debatable. iOS will again be playing catch up to Android in the very near future.
Pipsqueak approved this message.

[Q] iPhone 4 vs Captivate fluidity

I'm wonder what would is the reason behind the fluidity of the iPhone 4 ?
I got the captivate and most of friends got the iPhone 4 in, relatively, the same time.
The performance of their phones is superior to mine even though both phones have the mostly the same specifications !
BTW, I'm using CM7.

simply put, iphone is one OS meant specifically for one phone, developed by professionals..
Android is an OS that is spread over hundreds of different models.. Its hard to make everything perfect when the devices are constantly different (especially when different models are running different versions of Android). It's also open source and has the potential to be better than iOS but needs more time to develop IMO. I think the base SDK is pretty solid but then the carriers do thier own "tweaks" etc and we lose some of the functionality.
The reason I prefer Android over iOS is the ability to customize it. Your friends wont be flashing custom software on thier iPhones which to me is half the fun of having a "smart" phone.

Also iOS doesn't offer real multitasking. Its how they both handle memory and cpu usage. I'm not a fan of Apple mobile's BUT I have to admit that for single tasking and simplicity (ish) iOS is better.

prbassplayer said:
Also iOS doesn't offer real multitasking. Its how they both handle memory and cpu usage. I'm not a fan of Apple mobile's BUT I have to admit that for single tasking and simplicity (ish) iOS is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android is fundamentally going to be slower than iOS just because of the way it's structured. And yeah, a lot of it has to do with the multitasking aspect. Android is much more like a PC than iOS is
Sent from my lightning fast Glitched 1.3Ghz CM7 i897 Captivate

there is a thread about this from a couple days ago on the xda (news) portal about the comparison of android/ios multi-tasking, and info about it in a recent XDAtv episode.
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...gn=Feed:+xda-developers/ShsH+(xda-developers)
http://www.youtube.com/xdadevelopers#p/u/3/FFuWQyH3trg
you should check both daily for info on everything xda.

Thanks everyone for sharing these info
What about hardware acceleration. As I understood, ICS support full HW acceleration. So does the iOS offer the same feature ?
If so, does would we witness a change in the performance of ICS ?

do your own research.
use google. its new but it works pretty good.....

AhmadAlmousa said:
Thanks everyone for sharing these info
What about hardware acceleration. As I understood, ICS support full HW acceleration. So does the iOS offer the same feature ?
If so, does would we witness a change in the performance of ICS ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://plus.google.com/105051985738280261832/posts/XAZ4CeVP6DC

Superior GPU, OpenGL, Hardware acceleration, software optimization for one architecture...it's really more than one, single thing. Android guys like to point at it not having "true" multitasking, but that's just not true. iOS can run apps in the background and it is just as easy to switch apps in iOS as it us Android.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Hemlocke said:
Superior GPU, OpenGL, Hardware acceleration, software optimization for one architecture...it's really more than one, single thing. Android guys like to point at it not having "true" multitasking, but that's just not true. iOS can run apps in the background and it is just as easy to switch apps in iOS as it us Android.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The multitasking that you speak off is false. It closes apps as it wishes and sometime blocks access to other apps. I'm not knocking it it works great for most ppl. I've used Iphone 4 for 6 months and It annoyed the hell out of me. The Gpu is exactly the same. Both ru PowerVR SGX 5 series (535 for Iphone, 540 for us). On paper ours is a tad better since it can process 20M triangles/s vs Iphones 14M/s. Hardware accel we do not have (for now).

I started to describe the 4s, which does have the best GPU in a mobile device. My bad. On paper the 540 is better, but the hardware accel of the 4 makes the 535 perform better. iOS doesn't randomly shut down apps, it prioritizes. The performance is still noticeably better, and you still have multitasking in much the same way you do on Android. As for the 4s, we will need quad-core processors and much better GPUs to see that kind of performance.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

After installing ICS on my Samsung Captivate, it's about 95% as smooth as an iPhone (which I sold to get this phone). I'm really impressed! The hardware acceleration makes a big difference.

It has made a difference on my NS, too, but there are still things I hope they improve.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Hemlocke said:
It has made a difference on my NS, too, but there are still things I hope they improve.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Having gone to a Verizon store and used the Galaxy Nexus, I can report that it's pretty much right on par with the iPhone as far as fluidity and responsiveness. The browser in particular is light years ahead of the one in Gingerbread or Froyo.
I think the apples-to-apples comparison on our devices with GB vs ICS shows that the software is mostly responsible for the enhanced responsiveness. Go Google!

kimosen said:
After installing ICS on my Samsung Captivate, it's about 95% as smooth as an iPhone (which I sold to get this phone). I'm really impressed! The hardware acceleration makes a big difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After installing ICS on my Captivate, I have been thoroughly impressed with its responsiveness. Considering it is a port and the Devs have not had the source to work with, I was ecstatic to see this. Once they integrate the recently released source, I truly believe that even my "ancient" Captivate will rival the new iPhone.

They have had source for a while now...
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium

b-eock said:
They have had source for a while now...
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. The Team Hacksung build already has the source integrated.

Anyone Else Disappointed By The CPU?

I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...

GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??

ben83s said:
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.

GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am not into this topic right now but afaik there is no real open source hardware competitor on a tegra 3 level

gh123man said:
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you mean. But when your trying to copy the Kindle Fire and go main stream global, you need something that proven to work. IMHO at £160 its a big anouph gamble all ready.

No, the tegra 3 isn't as good as it should be, but for web surfing, a little gaming and movies and music, its more than enough. Quit griping. Lol
People always find something to complain about. Lol

OP the problem is the price. For $200 you need to go with the cheapest high end processor available, and apparently that is what Nvidia did with the Kai El project to put out speedy, low price tablets. Personally dual core is quick enough for me, plus I just bought a 7" tablet so...
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2

Yes, the tegra 3 isnt the best chip-set, but if they went with the snapdragon s4 they would have horrible supply issues, as there isnt enough s4's as it is. Also this was made by asus who has an existing relationship with nvida. Google has used this as a reference platform so it will be heavily optimized so performance shouldn't be an issue especially considering the screen resolution, keep in mind this is the same processor that runs the transformer prime at 1080p, without all the new gpu goodies. fyi all current tablets run tegra 3's

Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.

Cares said:
Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?

darkamikaze said:
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, it just means slower Dev updates after Google has given it up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

GBGamer said:
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, but apps are.

dalkor said:
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, apps are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

My opinion tegra 3 is the best CPU+GPU combo until the s4 quad core. I have a tegra 3 on my one x and hardly any lag whatsoever. Games look amazing, and amazing standby times. Maybe the nexus 7 will force nvidia to release drivers ect because of the demand
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app

tegra3 optimized games are by far the best Android games around. Tegra3 is no slouch, CPU or gpu wise. there will be no issues with custom roms. One X has a ton of custom roms/kernels. Prime has alot of roms also. I'm sure Nexus 7 will be far more popular than either of them.

GBGamer said:
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For $199 ? And they don't arrive until Q3/Q4.

For 200$ hell no I'm not disappointed
Stop complaining about everything!!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

I <3 Tegra. Got a Tegra phone and tegra tsblet... so gonna get the N7. I don't see what the problem is. Its very fast and good for gaming from the TegraZone
Sent from my Asus Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app

The Tegra 3 is actually a pretty powerful chipset. Think it's tainted a bit by being the 'child' of the Tegra 2, which was not as great as we hoped it would be. Combined with some of the performance improvements in Jelly Bean I expect this device to fly.

Is the iphone6 really faster?

So after seeing all these benchmarks, how the heck is the iPhone 6 plus faster than the nexus6? We've got 4 2.7ghz processor even though it is 32-bit compared to a dual core 1.4ghz 64-bit for the iPhone 6 plus... One of the reviews with benchmark figures is here
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Google-Nexus-6-vs-Apple-iPhone-6-Plus_id3854/page/2
How the heck is this possible, in graphics tests the iPhone has like 50% better performance according to this as well as other sites I looked at.
Can someone please explain this?
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app

nexus 6 vs iphone 6 vs note 4 speed test.. nexus 6 wins http://youtu.be/DV2X51kAVfc

Speed tests aside ... I had a 6 for 4 days to see if I would possibly like to switch. I didn't. I put it through it's paces and it is not even close to my N6. Now ... my previous N5 is slower but that's to be expected.

From that YouTube video it really seems like they were all the same, but it defiantly seems like the nexus 6 is slower at loading apps... Didn't really go over graphics performance which I thought was strange.... More detailed tests would be better...
I'll never buy an apple product in my life but I'm amazed at how that dual core processor can keep up with this quad core that is clocked twice as fast
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app

jwleonhart said:
From that YouTube video it really seems like they were all the same, but it defiantly seems like the nexus 6 is slower at loading apps... Didn't really go over graphics performance which I thought was strange.... More detailed tests would be better...
I'll never buy an apple product in my life but I'm amazed at how that dual core processor can keep up with this quad core that is clocked twice as fast
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the end of that video the Nexus 6 catches way up because of it's RAM, the iPhone 6 has to reload the apps entirely because it dumps them due to low memory.
Anyway, Android software has to support a very large range of hardware which lowers efficiency, and just the way it handles certain things about the OS is less efficient in general. iOS is much more streamlined for specific hardware and specific APIs, so it can do things very well for the hardware it has. Plus the graphics part of the iPhone6 processor is pretty beastly, no denying that. It is easily faster in raw power than the stuff in Snapdragons.

jwleonhart said:
From that YouTube video it really seems like they were all the same, but it defiantly seems like the nexus 6 is slower at loading apps... Didn't really go over graphics performance which I thought was strange.... More detailed tests would be better...
I'll never buy an apple product in my life but I'm amazed at how that dual core processor can keep up with this quad core that is clocked twice as fast
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're forgetting that its a 720p display vs a 1440p display...

iOS runs everything compiled. ART helps bridge that gap somewhat, but not completely. The apps are run compiled, since they are compiled when installed, but they are not fully optimized. A good iOS app is compiled and optimized for the very limited variations of hardware it will run on. There is an expectation in the iOS world of separate iPad and iPhone apps. On the Android side, the expectation is that every app will run on every Android device ever produced, lol. So we are counting on a generic compiling. There is simply no way it will be as effective. Its one reason Samsung TouchWiz camera apps are always so much better than the generic ones--they were built and optimized for a particular device.
Also, you are putting too much emphasis on the processor. Apple learned some hard lessons in the powerPC Mac days. The GPU often has more influence over the user experience than the main processor, and the GPUs that Apple uses are top shelf.

So where does this adreno GPU lay? Doesn't nvidia offer a tegra or something as a GPU? I'd assume that is probably killer.. This is a top shelf phone I'd just expect more... And the battery life is horrid I can't believe it. Gonna have to keep a charger with me at all times its that bad. This charge just last me about 6 hrs on medium usage
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app

and remember, the iPhone is a 1.5ghz dual core, the n6 2.65ghz quad core. that said, id stll want my device to be an android.

jwleonhart said:
So after seeing all these benchmarks, how the heck is the iPhone 6 plus faster than the nexus6? We've got 4 2.7ghz processor even though it is 32-bit compared to a dual core 1.4ghz 64-bit for the iPhone 6 plus... One of the reviews with benchmark figures is here
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Google-Nexus-6-vs-Apple-iPhone-6-Plus_id3854/page/2
How the heck is this possible, in graphics tests the iPhone has like 50% better performance according to this as well as other sites I looked at.
Can someone please explain this?
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who cares
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app

jwleonhart said:
So after seeing all these benchmarks, how the heck is the iPhone 6 plus faster than the nexus6? We've got 4 2.7ghz processor even though it is 32-bit compared to a dual core 1.4ghz 64-bit for the iPhone 6 plus... One of the reviews with benchmark figures is here
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Google-Nexus-6-vs-Apple-iPhone-6-Plus_id3854/page/2
How the heck is this possible, in graphics tests the iPhone has like 50% better performance according to this as well as other sites I looked at.
Can someone please explain this?
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Notice the multi core performance. The nexus 6 easily beats it. And the Adreno 420 GPU blows everything out of the water. It has the same frame rates as the iPhone 6 even while its running in 1440p!
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app