OMAP 3630 Kernel 3 source code - LG Optimus Black

I found this link, may be someone can compile for ICS? ??
http://e2e.ti.com/support/omap/f/849/t/166461.aspx
http://e2e.ti.com/support/omap/f/849/t/166461.aspx
http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/p-android-omap3-3.0
I hope cm9 for our device release soon

Nice
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium

I'm trying to make the kernel 3.0

Those sites and its contenet are well known here in xda ob development section. Btw until Ti will not release the improvments for the multimedia functionality there wont be a stable and daily use ics for our ob! we need to wait cm9 or lg itself in september to update officially to ics.

capocorp said:
Those sites and its contenet are well known here in xda ob development section. Btw until Ti will not release the improvments for the multimedia functionality there wont be a stable and daily use ics for our ob! we need to wait cm9 or lg itself in september to update officially to ics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true these sources are old but thanks for sharing any way.

Hi guys,
any news about kernel 3?
Did TI forget about OMAP3?
Thanks.

does this help
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1711061
making a kernel 3.0
its from the samsung galaxy s SL
same procesor

androidjel said:
does this help
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1711061
making a kernel 3.0
its from the samsung galaxy s SL
same procesor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have talked to him by PM.
Because it has the same AP I thought that it could help all devices that are OMAP3630 based, but apparently different devices need all the work that he made done again.

Related

[Q] What happens if Nvidia releases the drivers?

I have a question to devs in connection with the nvidia drivers as we know it will be rolled out soon. So if Nvidia releases them and the needed bits whether we (the CM team and the other devs of O2X community) would be able to build a new kernel like 2.6.36 or even 3.0 or just complete the existing 2.6.32 kernel?
And if we build a new kernel what benefits will come with it?
Thanks in advance!
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk
It's not really the kernel that is important, it's driver compatibility with the android layer. Kernel differences between 2.6 and 3 are not that great.
The new drivers would help us to access the hardware better without having to hack so much of the android framework
Hello!
This has been discussed to a large extend in the ICS threat...
Well if nvidia releases drivers compatible for ICS a working build will come fast(er).
And of course hardware support of all the shiny features of Tegra2 will be much easier and more readily available...
Sorry for reposting but I haven't read the ICS topics since they were spammed with requestions of ETAs.
Btw Thanks for the quick explenations!
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk

[General] [Q&A] Cyanogen Mod 9 Beta 4 For GT-S5570 : For all your questions.

Hello galaxy mini users,
Thankfully, Maclaw and his team are considering their development of Galaxy ICS for Galaxy Mini too and as a result we will soon get Beta 4 of latest ICS based CM9 custom rom.
You can find detailed info at this thread :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1539642
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I created this thread so that all users can express their happiness and share their joy with others. Want to say thanks, or ask questions, then please post there.
Help Keep the Development thread clean so that it will be easier for everyone to find latest information and hear latest news from the developers.
Cheers!
Placeholder!
Finally we are going to get beta 4 form Maclaw with majors fixes like camera and deep sleep.thanks Maclaw in advance.
Excited
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
tnx
tnx for this thread!>;]
I'm wondering when will USB Tethering, Wifi Hotspot & USB storage mounting be merged into CM9...
eksdiey said:
tnx for this thread!>;]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mention not...
Lion_Heart9x said:
I'm wondering when will USB Tethering, Wifi Hotspot & USB storage mounting be merged into CM9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry... I am foreseeing it being already fixed. It's just a matter of some time.
Radio
is not mentioned even radio
but i don't care
thanks maclaw
I've read about this beta 4 on its original thread, and looks like everything is really works.
but where's the download link?
Really eager to try it.
So, as i understand - games performance in ICS will be same as in Gingerbread?
Sent from my piece of **** using Tapatalk.
I don't think it has been uploaded yet. Really excited though.
kernel 3.0
Hi,
I wanted to know from the developers wether this is based on kernel 2.6.x or on kernel 3.x
I ask this beacuse I'm aware that it is not possible to compile the linux 3.x kernel for the armv6 architecture, but googling around I found that a patch has been created for the raspberry pi motherboard (which too integrates an armv6-compatible processor)
Here are some links:
SORRY BUT I CAN'T PUT EXTERNAL LINKS YET
(just google "Linux Kernel 3.1.9 for Raspberry Pi Released & Build Instructions")
Allright, the android kernel is highly customised, though, who knows, maybe this could help us galaxy mini users too!!
Maclaw is going to upload Beta4 today. Hope to use a stable Cm9.
Sorry, my English is not good
Please redirect to this thread.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1541074
No point on having two of the same topic
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

ics hw acceleration - ICS Tegra2 drivers are here

Anyone knows when nvidia plans to release drivers so we can have hw acceleration working in ICS.
EDIT: There are binary drivers for Tegra2 and ICS in Acer A200 tablet.
http://www.acertabletforum.com/foru...4-0-3-ultrabase-rooted-busybox-installed.html
No one knows and as the scene looks like, they never will release it...
We have many hardworking devz out there, I'm sure before Nvidia releases the code or even think to, we would have got jellybean too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
nexus2515 said:
No one knows and as the scene looks like, they never will release it...
We have many hardworking devz out there, I'm sure before Nvidia releases the code or even think to, we would have got jellybean too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and what good would jelly bee without drivers for our device?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
nexus2515 said:
No one knows and as the scene looks like, they never will release it...
We have many hardworking devz out there, I'm sure before Nvidia releases the code or even think to, we would have got jellybean too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd understand that they're not releasing the drivers because they rule the scene, but open source guys are running circles around them.
Qualcomm just released drivers for the adreno 2xx series So there is some hope from manufacturers
grognaz said:
and what good would jelly bee without drivers for our device?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant to say tht our hard wrking devs can find some way and get us jellybean android too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Galaid said:
I'd understand that they're not releasing the drivers because they rule the scene, but open source guys are running circles around them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they are doing these coz they Don't want other manufacturers to copy thier drivers or something like that
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Scougar said:
Qualcomm just released drivers for the adreno 2xx series So there is some hope from manufacturers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm never hid anything from develpors( at least i never heard about it)
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
nexus2515 said:
I meant to say tht our hard wrking devs can find some way and get us jellybean android too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, with all the work that ICS is giving just to release it for O2X i seriously doubt that we will ever get Jelly bean...
Sesto_Sento said:
LOL, with all the work that ICS is giving just to release it for O2X i seriously doubt that we will ever get Jelly bean...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have patiece bro
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Guys, ACER Iconia A200 has Tegra2 and ICS, why we cannot reuse those binary drivers for our Tegra2?
THE ROM IS here: http://www.acertabletforum.com/forum/acer-a200-roms/3974-rom-ics-4-0-3-ultrabase-rooted-busybox-installed.html
Atrix 4G also has Tegra2, ICS is comming soon..
http://www.motorola.com/blog/2012/02/15/update-motorola-ice-cream-sandwich-news/?pubid=987654
I believe Samsung Galaxy R (SGS2 with Tegra2) as well..
But A200 is here, I believe something can be cooked
First of all i'm not 100% sure about i'm about to say, but:
NVidia will probably never publish source codes of their drivers. They never did and they never will. Only phone manufacturer (LG in this case) can ask NVidia to make for them a specific kernel (or HAL?) with all required drivers. As far as i know LG is planning to do it becouse they want to give us official ICS "soon".
And about taking drivers from other devices...
It's quite complicated. In simple words hw video drivers are connected to specific kernel and somehow with other drivers (f.e sound, radio) which are diffrent then in f.e galaxy R. Samewhere on Ricardo Cerqueira's Google+ page was a discussion where someone explained how does it work and why it doesn't, but i can't find it atm.
Sorry about my english
RoXeon said:
First of all i'm not 100% sure about i'm about to say, but:
NVidia will probably never publish source codes of their drivers. They never did and they never will. Only phone manufacturer (LG in this case) can ask NVidia to make for them a specific kernel (or HAL?) with all required drivers. As far as i know LG is planning to do it becouse they want to give us official ICS "soon".
And about taking drivers from other devices...
It's quite complicated. In simple words hw video drivers are connected to specific kernel and somehow with other drivers (f.e sound, radio) which are diffrent then in f.e galaxy R. Samewhere on Ricardo Cerqueira's Google+ page was a discussion where someone explained how does it work and why it doesn't, but i can't find it atm.
Sorry about my english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't need the source, just the binaries. Driver shouldn't depend on the kernel, afaik.
Galaid said:
We don't need the source, just the binaries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said we do
Galaid said:
Driver shouldn't depend on the kernel, afaik.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAL has to match kernel. Thats why we can't use GB divers and thats why we can't use drivers from other devices with same video hw.
RoXeon said:
I never said we do
HAL has to match kernel. Thats why we can't use GB divers and thats why we can't use drivers from other devices with same video hw.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What would be the purpose of Qualcomm releasing user-mode driver binaries for Adreno 2xx GPU on Google Android Ice Cream Sandwich if it wasn't possible to integrate them with AOSP for any Adreno 2xx GPU?
Galaid said:
What would be the purpose of Qualcomm releasing user-mode driver binaries for Adreno 2xx GPU on Google Android Ice Cream Sandwich if it wasn't possible to integrate them with AOSP for any Adreno 2xx GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, i have no clue how it works, but still - HAL uses libs that are in kernel (HAL is dynamically linked with them). If other kernel version has diffrent structs, HAL simply won't work with that kernel. I thought that diffrent devices have a bit diffrent hw related libs (maybe some phones like O2X do?) in kernel which is messing up with HAL.
Taking into account Your post, at this point i have no idea why HAL is or is not related to specific device.

[Dev] [JB/ICS] OC Engine for 2.6.39 Kernel

I got time today a little while to observe OC possibility, and attempted. I was in hurry and these days I dont much have time these days so I've not tested what I've writtten, but theoretically it should work without issues:
OC Engine For LG Optimus 2x For 2.6.39.x Kernel
*It's written for 1.2Ghz but it's easy to ramp up to 1.4/1.5 by observing codes.
Devs feel free to use ,
and rippers dont rip codes to represent it as yours.
Download
*See attached patch file
Wow thank you so much.....will have a look at it right away......
spica1234 said:
I got time today a little while to observe OC possibility, and attempted. I was in hurry and these days I dont much have time these days so I've not tested what I've writtten, but theoretically it should work without issues:
OC Engine For LG Optimus 2x For 2.6.39.x Kernel
*It's written for 1.2Ghz but it's easy to ramp up to 1.4/1.5 by observing codes.
Devs feel free to use ,
and rippers dont rip codes to represent it as yours.
Download
*See attached patch file
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is another OC/UV patch
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1971350 (Please see attachments)
based on the "Overclocking the Toshiba AC100" work by gordan
- http://www.altechnative.net/2011/12/31/overclocking-the-toshiba-ac100/
and the TF101 OC by ibladesi
- https://github.com/ibladesi/TF101-HighOC-3P1
it works nicely with my SU660
harsh already applied simplified version of this OC/UV patch on his kernel
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/ed65546739d458454f0c4d14902d970626046e06
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/31cd7ea99b962386ba12e36fc99e3ac9dc858def
it needs two fixes
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/604d675b84aaa905a675109e52b4becebded9cff
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/4ade8a95ed07aa5ac08d1923f48192f91ced8d68
Thanks wkpark for all these references. I logged in xda after many days, I wasnt aware about yours and harsh's attempt about oc. Anyways but I am happy, about your references and yours and harsh's work . Actually your 2 refrences posted last are useful that's neccessory for oc, I made a long route instead as I din't get much time to observe other files.
Thank you anyways
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
Welcome back buddy.....
Old is gold.....have seen the two old buddies come back when there sadness with one good one gone....
But life is like that......good and bad
O2X with Magical ROM and supersonic kernels from my buddies
whank u spica any one compile a OC kernel all ready?
Take your time, but those can't wait, all of us in fact, must try Topogigis rom
Sent from the new smoothly LGP990
Thanks Spica
Subscribed :laugh:
CarloIT said:
Thanks Spica
Subscribed :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I logged in after many days and found wkpark has already made oc available in easy more effective ways and more robustly it has been written
Users are usually don't aware about the real heroes and those such persons are wkpark, harsh etc who has given very much contributions for lg optimus 2x.
So thanks deserving persons are wkpark and harsh as well that users must know
"Share, learn and enjoy" that's the key to OpenSource
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
wkpark said:
this is another OC/UV patch
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1971350 (Please see attachments)
based on the "Overclocking the Toshiba AC100" work by gordan
- http://www.altechnative.net/2011/12/31/overclocking-the-toshiba-ac100/
and the TF101 OC by ibladesi
- https://github.com/ibladesi/TF101-HighOC-3P1
it works nicely with my SU660
harsh already applied simplified version of this OC/UV patch on his kernel
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/ed65546739d458454f0c4d14902d970626046e06
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/31cd7ea99b962386ba12e36fc99e3ac9dc858def
it needs two fixes
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/604d675b84aaa905a675109e52b4becebded9cff
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/4ade8a95ed07aa5ac08d1923f48192f91ced8d68
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can u build one version for p990!
anjo88 said:
can u build one version for p990!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
commit in my github is for P990 itself.
But as Topo said, OC is flaky currently. Anything more than 1.2 GHz make phone hang. Need to find where did NVIDIA implemented code for making CPU stuck as half frequency if its OCed.
Harsh said:
commit in my github is for P990 itself.
But as Topo said, OC is flaky currently. Anything more than 1.2 GHz make phone hang. Need to find where did NVIDIA implemented code for making CPU stuck as half frequency if its OCed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great can u share it so that people can test! i have all msot shure that audio bug is boatloader related so if some on can compile a cm10 from RC and apply the new bootloader for testing will be great!
Anda I'm saying that because 28e/g cm10 old bootloader call problems v228/e/g new bootloader at 10 not a sigle call problem!
anjo88 said:
great can u share it so that people can test! i have all msot shure that audio bug is boatloader related so if some on can compile a cm10 from RC and apply the new bootloader for testing will be great!
Anda I'm saying that because 28e/g cm10 old bootloader call problems v228/e/g new bootloader at 10 not a sigle call problem!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bootloadr is not related with audio bug... and that will never be.
official leaked ics roms doesn't have audio bugs just because they are official p990 roms with the official p990 kernel from lg, i remind you that cm10 is using su660 kernel source, a not completely but strongly enough different phone.
pidocchio said:
official leaked ics roms doesn't have audio bugs just because they are official p990 roms with the official p990 kernel from lg, i remind you that cm10 is using su660 kernel source, a not completely but strongly enough different phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read a bit more, you'll find out that the original P990 ICS leak with untouched kernel is also suffering from the same bug. Nothing to do with CM10 or SU660...
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
pidocchio said:
bootloadr is not related with audio bug... and that will never be.
official leaked ics roms doesn't have audio bugs just because they are official p990 roms with the official p990 kernel from lg, i remind you that cm10 is using su660 kernel source, a not completely but strongly enough different phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read a bit more, you'll find out that the original P990 ICS leak with untouched kernel is also suffering from the same bug. Nothing to do with CM10 or SU660...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that the new bootloader and related thing have better compatibility with ics then the old gb bootloader, for sure..
I'm using the leaked ics from the beginning and i don't have a single call bug
Buccio said:
I think that the new bootloader and related thing have better compatibility with ics then the old gb bootloader, for sure..
I'm using the leaked ics from the beginning and i don't have a single call bug
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why dont adapt cm10 with new bootloader and then we know wheter the in call audio bug is still present or not....sorry for oot
godh3ll said:
why dont adapt cm10 with new bootloader and then we know wheter the in call audio bug is still present or not....sorry for oot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, someone with kind heart and capable should build cm10 with new bootloader/layout partition.
aldyu said:
Agree, someone with kind heart and capable should build cm10 with new bootloader/layout partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+11111
godh3ll said:
why dont adapt cm10 with new bootloader and then we know wheter the in call audio bug is still present or not....sorry for oot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know audio bug is really an annoying bug.
I don't know whether audio bug is related to boot loader or not.
And about boot loader, I won't say its impossible w/o sources but we don't have boot loader sources, neither sources of old nor new:/
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
don't care about OC on JB, need ramhack...CM10 have tiny free ram

[ROM][Port][Alpha 1] ParanoidAndroid

Hey all this threads made for developer who want to help me fix the bugs in this rom
Note: this builds only for expert only thats know how to logcat and fix the bugs when appears using this rom
Disclaimer:i will not take any responsibility for bricking your device this rom totaly ported to our ace soo do with ur own risk
You should be on my CM7 Specific basic kernel and on a CM7 RC4 Based ROM!!
Wipe everything - data, cahce and dalvik
Mount system
Install zip from sdcard - ROM
special thanks to:
bieltv3 for cm9 Alpha 1
NickHalden for panoroid rom
just a test if it works i will then update it to beta 1
download link
http://www.4shared.com/zip/Jgg-Hr5E/paranoid.html?
I can test for you later. Is it booting?
Enviado do Brasil
EDIT: I voted for not closing the thread. Why? Because when Cm7 was still on beta, ivchek said this, and i agree: these rom are good, so they deserve the paralel development.
hey
mathm2013 said:
I can test for you later. Is it booting?
Enviado do Brasil
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I dont have the device I ported this to Ace i cause i couldnt find this rom in the thread. So i need testers to test this
problem
sarmadulhaq said:
Actually I dont have the device I ported this to Ace i cause i couldnt find this rom in the thread. So i need testers to test this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
installation aborted !!
R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again
sarmadulhaq said:
R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried it twice same problem wait for any other users reply
sarmadulhaq said:
R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not putting you down or anything, but there isn't really a need to port it. Nobody will use the Rom for now.
Sent from my Cosmic Ace-i
Actually, I would use the rom if it was based on beta 1, since the wifi works... At least he is trying to get some new things for ace i.
I was just about to port this But good job!
yeah, you need to port it again but this time using new CM build. Anyway: is there a sense to port ICS (cm9) based roms if there is no stable build for cooperve? Personally i think we should wait for RC version like CM7.2 by biel.
drumiec said:
yeah, you need to port it again but this time using new CM build. Anyway: is there a sense to port ICS (cm9) based roms if there is no stable build for cooperve? Personally i think we should wait for RC version like CM7.2 by biel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 i think we should wait for a rc release from biel. becuz i think noone wont use this rom. sorry. but anyway u r trying to give us something good.
Galaxy Pop Plus'ımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi.
Installation aborted...but Keep up the good work...
Love to see PA on our ace-i and ya!! as the other members suggested, better wait for RC release...
I think closing the thread waiting for a release candidate is not the thing to do. There's people that will use the ROM even with all the bugs and the lag, if it's present.
Please continue the rom it will take time but good things will happen here. I love pa and wish you the best in your work. Thank you bro.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Just why do you want to port it instead of building it?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app
GT-af said:
Just why do you want to port it instead of building it?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)
Why so much hurry in making cm9 based roms..Let atleast stable version come..
My suggestion..Not discouraging you..But according to me wait for stable cm9..
Atleast Hit Thanx If I helped U-XDA Rule
Bootanimations for MDPI Devices
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2126329
Howdareme said:
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be as cm9, without difference of driver,if cm9 has driver PA Will also, porting create many little bugs, and paranoid is made to be built i think
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app
Howdareme said:
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thing you said is absurd. Porting will create more bugs. And a port takes libs from base rom, so porting and building makes no difference at this point, but porting might create bugs as it was built for another device.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources