[ROM][PORT] OptimusNexus ALPHA: 1 | 04032013 - Nexus 4 Android Development

Hello friends!
Today I release a Optimus G rom for our Nexus 4! This is a very early alpha build/port so dont expect a lot of functionality!
I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BRICKED DEVICES!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Whats working in Alpha 1:
- It boots
- Screen works
- Sound works
- Charging works
- Bluetooth works
- Connecting to PC works
- LED notification works
- Anything related to CPU/GPU is working
- Navigation buttons for Nexus 4 work
Whats not working:
- GSM + WiFi
- Camera
- GPS
- Notebook FC's
- Random reboots
DO NOT FLASH THE BOOT.IMG ON NEXUS 4 ROMS, IT WILL BREAK SOME THINGS LIKE WIFI.
Code:
[CENTER]Changelog:
Alpha 1: Initial release[/CENTER]
Flash with CWM or TWRP
Download link Alpha 1: https://mega.co.nz/#!fFEEWSQS!K_3LVHkhj9Av-KpYINuSWXPK5B4VmrykdXm4ijYNUn8
OPTIONAL
Download link boot.img for Alpha 1: http://d-h.st/SsP
Donations
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=8J4B5RXM7UZKQ​

Optimus G kernel or replaced with Nexus4 stock kernel? Flashing a Nexus4 specific kernel seems to be a greet idea.
We should only change the device specific parts of the rom to be fully working.
I'll try to help later today.
Tapatalk 2-vel küldve az én Nexus 4-ről

Not that I would revert back to manufacture based skinned ROMs, but +1 for the nexus dev community!

TaRsY said:
Optimus G kernel or replaced with Nexus4 stock kernel? Flashing a Nexus4 specific kernel seems to be a greet idea.
We should only change the device specific parts of the rom to be fully working.
I'll try to help later today.
Tapatalk 2-vel küldve az én Nexus 4-ről
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Optimus G kernel.
Its pretty hard to use the Nexus 4 kernel and modules etc. since its for Android 4.2.x and this rom is Android 4.1.2 =]

Aerys said:
Optimus G kernel.
Its pretty hard to use the Nexus 4 kernel and modules etc. since its for Android 4.2.x and this rom is Android 4.1.2 =]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oops forgot about this..

Not trying to say this isn't awesome but I'm only interested in that damn lock screen! That unlock effect is what everyone is after! Hopefully this is the beginning of that work. Well done for this! :thumbup:
Sent from my Nexus4™

benrees21 said:
Not trying to say this isn't awesome but I'm only interested in that damn lock screen! That unlock effect is what everyone is after! Hopefully this is the beginning of that work. Well done for this! :thumbup:
Sent from my Nexus4™
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea the lockscreen is really beautiful!
EDIT:
Download link Alpha 1:
https://mega.co.nz/#!fFEEWSQS!K_3LVHkhj9Av-KpYINuSWXPK5B4VmrykdXm4ijYNUn8
Have fun =]

Awesome!!! When I was deciding what my next phone would be, it was between a nexus 4, an xperia z, and an optimus g....now I can see what I missed out on!
Great work...can't wait for a stable build

Note; When you boot the device it will do a media scan. It will be VERY slow and laggy for like 10-20 seconds.

The things that i find interesting are the wonderful lockscreen and the colors on the screen looks amazing, hope the devs here can put the Optimus G RGB and gamma values into their kernels.

Can't wait. I wonder if this rom will provide better battery life. LG has some tweaks in their software that's not part of stock android.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium

NardVa said:
Can't wait. I wonder if this rom will provide better battery life. LG has some tweaks in their software that's not part of stock android.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My generalization about lg's android experience in the past is they have no idea what they are doing with software(not that I do either) and battery life was horrific. Maybe they got better and more experienced dev teams together. We shall see. On the other hand the nexus 4 is a mighty fine experience:thumbup:

Does this rom have an optimus or a nexus kernel? If it's an Optimus one, maybe we can use some of the custom optimus kernels with it! Then we can really get some awesome stuff!
*edit*
I hadn't looked through their forums to see that they are still in development infancy stages Maybe our cooperation can be mutually beneficial!

I think we will need the Nexus 4 kernel for rild and Wifi but yeah lets experiment a little.

davwman said:
My generalization about lg's android experience in the past is they have no idea what they are doing with software(not that I do either) and battery life was horrific. Maybe they got better and more experienced dev teams together. We shall see. On the other hand the nexus 4 is a mighty fine experience:thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is because (IMHO) LG are like Sony....they make some of the sexiest, best performing, highest quality hardware you can find for many different types of devices/electronics. However, they have absolutely no business making software & firmware.
Having said that, I do think they have a great deal of wonderful IDEAS that they implement into their electronics (especially android) but they are usually not polished well, and end up being unstable or just buggy as hell. I do love having those features pulled out and isolated, though, so I can have a monstrous selection of special features that were never intended to work together, though. And when they are, for example, android mods added on top of pure aosp, beautiful things happen, IMHO

Aerys said:
I think we will need the Nexus 4 kernel for rild and Wifi but yeah lets experiment a little.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't see why that wouldn't work. Same hardware

davwman said:
Don't see why that wouldn't work. Same hardware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's my exact school of thought here, as well. I would think if the rom can be swapped out so easily, there's no reason why at least SOME of the kernels wouldn't work by default, as well.
I'm looking specifically at the aokp port for optimus...that's got to have a custom kernel, I would think...and it's most likely optimized for optimus (lol...say that 5 times fast )

Do you even think this will boot on a n4 kernel?
Would it be easier having a 4.2.2 ROM with the LG stuff added or what's your game plan? I'm very excited about this..
Sent from my Nexus 4

ChongoDroid said:
Do you even think this will boot on a n4 kernel?
Would it be easier having a 4.2.2 ROM with the LG stuff added or what's your game plan? I'm very excited about this..
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My goal is to get a fully working Optimus G rom. The Nexus 4 kernel doesnt boot with this rom, so I have to look at other options.

In theory with the correct radio/kernel combo, would this rom be capable of using DC HSPA +42? I guess a better question would be is the Optimus G capable of it?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app

Related

[ROM] Condemned CM7.2 Stable (2.3.7) V15 (6/21/2012)

Credits:
cyanogen of course for the source
Chad and tiny for the kernel
workshed, conap and gnarlyc for their help getting me started and answering all my questions
Bobcat331 and scotty85 for testing, contributing and instigating me.
CUViper and PonsAsinorem for the BlueTooth fix
The entire Eris community for their support and contributions along the way.
This is a modified and tweaked version of CM7. Features chad's Incredikernel with smartass v2. It also now uses ICS Roboto font.
Dalvik and cache wipe only should be fine for most.
Condemned CM7 V15
Thanks to goo-inside.me for the file hosting
CyanogenMod merged changelog
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
6-21-12 - resync with cm source, wifi fixed
6/2/12 - resync with CM source
3/4/12 - Resync with CM source, fix market issues and missing shared lib
errors, fix mod version in build.prop to reflect V13
2/3/12 - Resynced with CM source.
1/14/12 - Resynced with CM source.
1/08/12 - Resynced with CM source. Removed Stripped 2 Hell version for now.
Adjusted tweaks and build prop. See CM changelog for full source
changes.
11/05/11 - Some tweaks adjustments and added BT fix from Pons and CUViper
10/23/11 - updated to CM7.1 Stable, Change to ICS Roboto font, added S2H version, more tweaks including portions of Dsextons universal adrenaline shot, updated to 10/08 incredikernel, removed 3d Gallery in place of QuickPic
8/13/11 - resynced with CM Source, added Juwe11's RamScript
7/12/11 - resynced with CM Source, modded build prop and boot image, changed boot animation.
6/30/11 - resynced with CM Source. Upgraded to chad's latest kernel.
As always What you do to your device is your choice not mine. If anything happens to your device it's your problem not mine.
Enjoy
Reserved...
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Reserved
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
What are the differences between this and CM7?
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
masully1984 said:
What are the differences between this and CM7?
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah what tweaks of your own did you add?
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Hey Condemned nice to see you over here on this side bro! I remember you from when I had the Eris.
EDIT: This guy was one of the best Devs for the Eris. Don't be surprised of you see some good stuff coming from him for the DINC.
masully1984 said:
What are the differences between this and CM7?
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theguitarguy58 said:
Yeah what tweaks of your own did you add?
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really haven't run the nightlies here... (just got my Dinc this past weekend). But all I see are 7.0.3 which seems strange but no matter. The main reason I went CM for now is to get myself accustomed with the Inc and I'm used to CM from the Eris. This is CM7.1 and I'm using chad's kernel instead of CM. It seemed a little smoother to me for now. I also increased SD Card read/write speed as well as added the local.prop file to help with any LauncherPro fans. I personally like ADW EX but everything is a matter of opinion and preference. Another thing was change wifi scan intervals to help save a little on the battery and I'm still experimenting with a few other things but I probably won't have them nailed down before the next update seeing that RC1 has now been merged. I'll be updating this ROM sometime tomorrow at this point now lol.
wildstang83 said:
Hey Condemned nice to see you over here on this side bro! I remember you from when I had the Eris.
EDIT: This guy was one of the best Devs for the Eris. Don't be surprised of you see some good stuff coming from him for the DINC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How you been stang? Looks like you're doing pretty well over here . I'm gonna be checking that ROM out soon once I get things under way a little more. I'm planning to do a stripped version of this like I did for the Eris and I'm thinking I might do the Ghost Rider version of it as well. The Eris is still active too so I'll be bouncing back and forth from here to there alot lol.
I'd hardly say one of the best but thanks for the boost I'm still pretty green and shed and conap have really taught me alot
Applies palm on face...
davwman said:
Applies palm on face...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do that?
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
davwman said:
Applies palm on face...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Laughs... I expect these comments and really don't care apply what you'd like where you'd like. It will always have the same end result.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
CondemnedSoul said:
But all I see are 7.0.3 which seems strange but no matter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plenty of CM fans here and 7.1 for the Inc. is alive and well in this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=916881
I guess my comment was taken the wrong way. I made the comment for all the haters getting ready to bash the rom. I for one applaud another developer joing the incredible force.
davwman said:
I guess my comment was taken the wrong way. I made the comment for all the haters getting ready to bash the rom. I for one applaud another developer joing the incredible force.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess it was mistaken then as I expect the bashing but like I said don't care lol. My apologies for mistaking your comment.
no offense taken.
Yea man we got some seriously sik devs over on the Inc man. I've been working fairly close with a couple of them newtoroot and joelZ9614. They've been really good at helping me get a start on my port.
But yea I definitely miss workshed and Tazzpatriot. Those guys are the reason I had the Eris so long.
And Conap, well Conap was the first dev ever to teach me anything about Android. That guy has been at it for a really long time.
Anyways, yea man check out pure speed and let me know whats up and I'll do the same.
Welcome! Always have some love for another CM-based dec. Especially one like yourself with experience and class (giving out credit where due)
Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
wildstang83 said:
Yea man we got some seriously sik devs over on the Inc man. I've been working fairly close with a couple of them newtoroot and joelZ9614. They've been really good at helping me get a start on my port.
But yea I definitely miss workshed and Tazzpatriot. Those guys are the reason I had the Eris so long.
And Conap, well Conap was the first dev ever to teach me anything about Android. That guy has been at it for a really long time.
Anyways, yea man check out pure speed and let me know whats up and I'll do the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll definitely be checking it out man. Working on a resync now and updating the Eris ROM's as well lol.
pronghornrunner said:
Welcome! Always have some love for another CM-based dec. Especially one like yourself with experience and class (giving out credit where due)
Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always try to give credit. Sometimes I might miss some but I'll fix it when I see it lol.
Thanks for the pleasant welcome. Hopefully this forum will be as fun as the Eris forum
Cool ROM!!
CS does excellent work. those of us with an eris know this allready condemned cm7 is the smoothest and fastest rom my lil eris has ever run.
B-S is running great for me,and i cant wait to see what you come up with hear in the future. makes me super happy to see you growing and expanding into other devices
next step is to get you a TB
this rom is smooth and solid.

SwiftExtreme Kernel is great!

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1325183
I have flashed the Kernel the day before yesterday, and got my battery charged to 100%, then un-plugged my charger.
About 34 hours after unplug the charger, with daily normal usage(several phone calls, some reading on web), there are still 38% power remain.
I would like to see a battery usage screenshot showing the "Display" use
Which app can I install for screen capturing?
use the battery monitor widget pro, and you can save your bat history
Wah! said:
Which app can I install for screen capturing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you hit power button and home at same time it should screenshot. Or just post screen on hours
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Has anyone tried it on cm7 stable rom?
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk
Just found the "down +home" can do screen cap in MIUI. Here is the screen cap.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Whats the best kernel for stock gb??
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
hellbison said:
Whats the best kernel for stock gb??
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HorsePower kernel.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
ron_gangte said:
HorsePower kernel.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
HP kernel is the best kernel with topogigi rom.
Because the kernel is still updated.
Wah! said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1325183
I have flashed the Kernel the day before yesterday, and got my battery charged to 100%, then un-plugged my charger.
About 34 hours after unplug the charger, with daily normal usage(several phone calls, some reading on web), there are still 38% power remain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I tried this kernel with CyanogenMod nightly 195, and I found the phone to be laggy as hell. Which ROM were you using?
Thanks. Anil
I have this kernel (older version with owains tweak pack) on miui and my experience has been just wonderful. Excellent standby time, haven't felt my phone heat up even once, no bsod's. I found cm7 to be very laggy in the first place so I moved to miui and boy am I glad. On cm it felt like every new flash it got slower and I was worried it might break. On miui things are so simple, just install miui, reboot and install tweak pack(it includes kernel older version) and your done. Just two steps. If you guys like this kernel please add your feedback to the kernel's page here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1325183
i have this kernel on my cm7 (the nightly from today) clocked at 1.5 GHz and i get
#Quadrant Standart:
1st try: 3701 pts
2nd try: 4144 pts
3rd try: 4644 pts
4th try: 4639 pts
#AnTuTu Benchmark v2.4.2:
1st try: 7464 pts
2nd try: 7524 pts
After that i have restarted my phone, because it was getting really hot..
#Smartbench 2011 :
1st try: Failed! (Invalid results - at least one of the test dind't execute throug completely. Please try again.)
2nd test: Failed! (same as above)
3rd test: Failed! (again)
So i think its a very fast kernel !
Before this one, i have used the vorkkernel.. and this has got many bugs with 1.5ghz (e-peen), but this kernel (swiftextreme) is just Great !
retareq said:
I have this kernel (older version with owains tweak pack) on miui and my experience has been just wonderful. Excellent standby time, haven't felt my phone heat up even once, no bsod's. I found cm7 to be very laggy in the first place so I moved to miui and boy am I glad. On cm it felt like every new flash it got slower and I was worried it might break. On miui things are so simple, just install miui, reboot and install tweak pack(it includes kernel older version) and your done. Just two steps. If you guys like this kernel please add your feedback to the kernel's page here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1325183
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I have no issues with CM7. The only reason I was interested in a different kernel was to see if I could get better battery life.
No matter, I will stick with CM7 & the kernel they provide. I found MIUI to be very beautiful, and very well thought out. But, it is an ANDROID version of Apple's iOS' look and feel, plus they imitate the iOS way of doing things.
Have fun. Anil
If you love cm7 then you should know this kernel works for both miui and cm7. Just use it already, its a known fact that this kernel is the shiznit.
retareq said:
If you love cm7 then you should know this kernel works for both miui and cm7. Just use it already, its a known fact that this kernel is the shiznit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I have used it and found it to be laggy as "shiznit". In fact I tried it again last night, the low overclock version and my phone failed to boot.
You carry on though. Anil
Well you should post your findings in the kernel thread here. How else are we going to find what needs fixing ? I am on an optimus 2x and and the kernel is working almost 100% for me. If I had to guess I would say its because I'm on miui. I have a friend with an o2x with the kernel on cm7 and his experience is also not satisfactory.
I used to love cm7 and think miui is the ios look alike but after using it for few weeks I can tell you its not. I think most people are still thinking of the old miui with iphone icons(things have changed). I will not go deeper into that discussion because this is the page for kernel discussion. We are all entitled to enjoy the kernels and roms we like, but if you are experiencing issues the least you can do is alert the dev in the appropriate page. Please don't take it personally but there are many many cm7 users in the swift kernel thread who have posted their experiences and its opposite of what you are saying.
retareq said:
Well you should post your findings in the kernel thread here. How else are we going to find what needs fixing ? I am on an optimus 2x and and the kernel is working almost 100% for me. If I had to guess I would say its because I'm on miui. I have a friend with an o2x with the kernel on cm7 and his experience is also not satisfactory.
I used to love cm7 and think miui is the ios look alike but after using it for few weeks I can tell you its not. I think most people are still thinking of the old miui with iphone icons(things have changed). I will not go deeper into that discussion because this is the page for kernel discussion. We are all entitled to enjoy the kernels and roms we like, but if you are experiencing issues the least you can do is alert the dev in the appropriate page. Please don't take it personally but there are many many cm7 users in the swift kernel thread who have posted their experiences and its opposite of what you are saying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I have posted my findings here. I find it very laggy. It also failed to boot. There you go two findings.
Why would I take your opinion personally? I'm glad many others have had no issues. Do you only want to hear from users with positive experiences?
If you can make some suggestions as to how best to provide technical feedback then please let me know, and I will be more than happy to do so.
Anil
aksolanki said:
Hi, I have posted my findings here. I find it very laggy. It also failed to boot. There you go two findings.
Why would I take your opinion personally? I'm glad many others have had no issues. Do you only want to hear from users with positive experiences?
If you can make some suggestions as to how best to provide technical feedback then please let me know, and I will be more than happy to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its not perfect. If it was development would stop right ?
I wanted to make sure I didn't come off as offensive, you will be surprised how many cm7 fanatics are out there who will start yelling the moment they hear miui. I didn't want to sound like im promoting miui but rather the kernel powering it. If you check the last few posts you will see there have been an increase in cm7 users of the kernel and they are reporting good results on the new nightlies.
I would like to point out that with miui I have not upgraded anything in over a month and its still going smooth. I see so many cm7 users with bsod and no boots and bootloops and so on with almost every version that came out they have issues whereas the miui users have barely said anything. I guess coz its works for us ?
I think the best way is to post in the kernel thread in the development area. The developer is regular there so if you have anything at all to add, features you want or fixes to current version etc. please post there. The dev is very friendly and him or someone cm7 user will help you find your match.
Once again this is the original thread please post your results and comments here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1325183

[REQUESTS]Porting I9300 Roms to I9305

For all Porting discussions and requests hopefully they get answered. I think soon once a Dev knows what they are doing, this will be the case he will work with all the i9300 Rom Devs and work on porting them to I9305.
Hopefully. . Lol
I'm suspecting not that hard - in fact i am now porting ... seems to have good progress =]
it wont be long when devs start to play with I9305, we just need to keep this forum active and help people like Kazuni with their rom testing
_ray_ said:
it wont be long when devs start to play with I9305, we just need to keep this forum active and help people like Kazuni with their rom testing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't guarantee my promptly reply on debugging and feature requests, but they are welcome. After all I have a pretty hectic daytime job
kazuni said:
I can't guarantee my promptly reply on debugging and feature requests, but they are welcome. After all I have a pretty hectic daytime job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any chance of ASOP any time soon? in your opinion...
Hope so, will make rom development alot eaisier if they can just port them accross for us
had hypergalaxy ported to my device... now trying to get the FC out... and trying to figure out abt the signal lost...
with so much debate of whether the I9305 supports fm radio I wonder if anyone has ported the I9300 radio app/firmware to settle the argument. not that i really care about fm radio lol...
springah said:
any chance of ASOP any time soon? in your opinion...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP would be a bit difficult for me, as I am not very good at working on AOSP materials however I will still investigate porting something like CM/MIUIv4 over when I got some time this weekend
cyborg24 said:
with so much debate of whether the I9305 supports fm radio I wonder if anyone has ported the I9300 radio app/firmware to settle the argument. not that i really care about fm radio lol...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive tried few fm radio and is not working with our stock kernel..
kazuni said:
AOSP would be a bit difficult for me, as I am not very good at working on AOSP materials however I will still investigate porting something like CM/MIUIv4 over when I got some time this weekend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about AOKP? Or is CM AOKP....?
Also, which part of the rom is it that is making things like the toggle switches big, green and ugly, and not a stock JB look of small and blue?
Like this :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
singlecell83 said:
How about AOKP? Or is CM AOKP....?
Also, which part of the rom is it that is making things like the toggle switches big, green and ugly, and not a stock JB look of small and blue?
Like this :
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOKP is a complete new set of material to work with - it requires custom kernel building and additional proprietary drivers, and fortunately samsung has provided I9305 as open source already; however, i am not familiar with kernel building on android, so I probably won't be working on CM based builds unless I can gain some more knowledge :\ Sorry.
Fm radio will not work if the kernel does not support it, and if the kernel that came with firmware which didnt have FM radio pre-installed then it wont be programmed to support it, Basically meaning no drivers. Mick.Wheels was working on compiling a kernel to support FM but he is now on holidays so gotta wait. This guy caled Weeeo was reveiwing a I9305 for his sponsor SamsungUK apparently, But I saw his video on youtube and it was showing the FM radio app , so i asked him if he could test it which he did and was working fine. so I am in the middle of asking him to create a nandroid for us to play with. He is currently waiting for a replacement phone as his screen was scratched. So will see what happens then when it returns. Exciting timessssss
btemtd said:
Fm radio will not work if the kernel does not support it, and if the kernel that came with firmware which didnt have FM radio pre-installed then it wont be programmed to support it, Basically meaning no drivers. Mick.Wheels was working on compiling a kernel to support FM but he is now on holidays so gotta wait. This guy caled Weeeo was reveiwing a I9305 for his sponsor SamsungUK apparently, But I saw his video on youtube and it was showing the FM radio app , so i asked him if he could test it which he did and was working fine. so I am in the middle of asking him to create a nandroid for us to play with. He is currently waiting for a replacement phone as his screen was scratched. So will see what happens then when it returns. Exciting timessssss
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be great. On one hand we have a dev that would try to compile the kernel from source - which means we could (in future) adding overclocking support, init.d support, amongst a few things.
On the unfortunate part is that, I've contacted gokhanmoral and confirmed that works on LTE model will not be done since there are not enough time nor the actual hardware. It would be great if someone can pickup the source from git and see if there are anything we can do to make a branch.
I was also looking into porting CM. But as of today I haven't found time to get a new build environment up and running. Maybe I'll look into it later today. As far as I saw it shouldn't be too hard to port CM from 9300... But on the other hand I have less experience with Samsung phones than with their TVs Anyway, if I get some progress you will be the first to know about it.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9305 mit Tapatalk 2
I have an i9300, and just stumbled onto this thread. If someone can give me a system dump there is a good chance I can compare both of them and see the differences between the i9300 and i9305. It shouldn't be too different, probably requiring some minor changes to get this working (the main difference here is only the radio to support LTE and the extra RAM)
Sent from my Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T using xda app-developers app
I will give you what you need, I have just PM'd you ... You have the Brain I have the Game (I9305) looll Letz Do dizzzz braaa Team LIQUID indhouse lol
hiemanshu said:
I have an i9300, and just stumbled onto this thread. If someone can give me a system dump there is a good chance I can compare both of them and see the differences between the i9300 and i9305. It shouldn't be too different, probably requiring some minor changes to get this working (the main difference here is only the radio to support LTE and the extra RAM)
Sent from my Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that is all the differences are, and the 9305 parts can be implemented into a 9300 rom, does that mean we could convert any custom 9300 rom into a 9305 rom? Or am I just dreaming?
singlecell83 said:
If that is all the differences are, and the 9305 parts can be implemented into a 9300 rom, does that mean we could convert any custom 9300 rom into a 9305 rom? Or am I just dreaming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the time yes, because we just have to be careful about integrating the drivers for the modem. I'm not so sure about CM/AOKP roms since they have their own built drivers. I'm unfortunately not familiar with driver building so perhaps someone else can shed some light on this topic hopefully.
Questions or Problems Should Not Be Posted in the Development Forum
Please Post in the Correct Forums & Read the Forum Rules
Thanks ✟
Moving to Q&A

Any way to remove LG UI 3.0 ?

Is there any way to complete remove LG UI 3.0 and run pure Android UI ?
fmgeraldine said:
Is there any way to complete remove LG UI 3.0 and run pure Android UI ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In theory, yes. In practice, not a hope in hell
SimonTS said:
In theory, yes. In practice, not a hope in hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG UI is too heavy , too full of useless features, i want Google UI , hehehe.
fmgeraldine said:
LG UI is too heavy , too full of useless features, i want Google UI , hehehe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So .. put a different launcher on there, read the threads on battery optimization and remove the stuff that you don't want or need.
SimonTS said:
So .. put a different launcher on there, read the threads on battery optimization and remove the stuff that you don't want or need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All things already done, try some launchers , battery life is good now, but , Google interface , still #1 for me . My friend buy an Razor i without MOTOBLUR and all of motorola things, the result : a ****ing awesome smooth phone. I dont know if its an interface gain or Jelly Bean gain, but is lighter, smoother and faster than all ive ever seen before.
Just wait for the JB update. Currently there is no way to completely remove the LG UI. If the unlocked bootloader comes with the update, there should be some AOSP roms shortly afterwards. Jelly Bean surely makes things a lot smoother due to the Butter improvements. But compared with other ICS phones our 4X is already quite smooth, and the LG UI seems to be a lot lighter than other manufacturer's modifications like TouchWiz or Sense.
muellersmattes said:
Just wait for the JB update. Currently there is no way to completely remove the LG UI. If the unlocked bootloader comes with the update, there should be some AOSP roms shortly afterwards. Jelly Bean surely makes things a lot smoother due to the Butter improvements. But compared with other ICS phones our 4X is already quite smooth, and the LG UI seems to be a lot lighter than other manufacturer's modifications like TouchWiz or Sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Believe me ... Intel + motorola do an awesome work on their ROM , its lighter than iphone OS , serious ... JB AOSP is the lightest system ive ever see, im waiting JB like an child waits santa. Our 4x is much more powerful than Intel Atom on Razor i , our limitations are based on OS and UI 3.0 IMHO.
fmgeraldine said:
Believe me ... Intel + motorola do an awesome work on their ROM , its lighter than iphone OS , serious ... JB AOSP is the lightest system ive ever see, im waiting JB like an child waits santa. Our 4x is much more powerful than Intel Atom on Razor i , our limitations are based on OS and UI 3.0 IMHO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola doesn't have AOSP as standard. If you look at their Motoblur it's also no "light" system. And I doubt that Intel is doing anything software-wise. But Motorola is going back towards a more AOSP-like system, and so has LG done. Compare it with the 2X (I've never had one, but you can read enough on it). I think it would be best if one could choose: Either manufacturer's UI with their improvements (e.g. LG's energy management or the "airplane-mode-off-without-PIN" feature) or AOSP. But that would be two systems to manage for the companys, so we won't get that. As said, when the unlocked bootloader comes, there will be custom roms for sure and then you can exchange the LG UI.
muellersmattes said:
Motorola doesn't have AOSP as standard. If you look at their Motoblur it's also no "light" system. And I doubt that Intel is doing anything software-wise. But Motorola is going back towards a more AOSP-like system, and so has LG done. Compare it with the 2X (I've never had one, but you can read enough on it). I think it would be best if one could choose: Either manufacturer's UI with their improvements (e.g. LG's energy management or the "airplane-mode-off-without-PIN" feature) or AOSP. But that would be two systems to manage for the companys, so we won't get that. As said, when the unlocked bootloader comes, there will be custom roms for sure and then you can exchange the LG UI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for that, when i said AOSP , i meant they coming with Google's native launcher.
SimonTS said:
So .. put a different launcher on there, read the threads on battery optimization and remove the stuff that you don't want or need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry are you kidding me apart from nexus phones the LG optimus 3.0 skin is the lightest skin outthere by MILES sony samsung and definitely HTC have much heavyer skinns on ther phones.
the only phones with lighter skins are phones with stock android and those can be counted on 1 hand.
The 4x is a pretty fast phone. I actually run mine on 640 MHz and it is still fast. U can't really notice anything lagging. Well if u play games but then I just turn it up to 1500mhz
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
dante501 said:
The 4x is a pretty fast phone. I actually run mine on 640 MHz and it is still fast. U can't really notice anything lagging. Well if u play games but then I just turn it up to 1500mhz
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even on 1000 mhz it is fast enough to play shadowgun from tegrazone which only shows that current quad cores are more then fast enough for any app out there.
hutjeflut said:
even on 1000 mhz it is fast enough to play shadowgun from tegrazone which only shows that current quad cores are more then fast enough for any app out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
guys , i just dont want the LG UI 3.0 , i prefer Google UI , so do i asked here ...
For the pure Google ui u either have to have a costume Rom or buy a nexus phone or tablet. That's just how it is.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 08:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 PM ----------
Ur question was answered. U can't remove the lg ui as if yet.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
I have removed current LG home screen app and using apex launcher..not because it ws not smooth because i needed more functions and i also got more free memory
Check below:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
hutjeflut said:
sorry are you kidding me apart from nexus phones the LG optimus 3.0 skin is the lightest skin outthere by MILES sony samsung and definitely HTC have much heavyer skinns on ther phones.
the only phones with lighter skins are phones with stock android and those can be counted on 1 hand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wind your neck in, or reconsider how you write things please. :banghead:
I never said ANYTHING about the UI, I actually quite like it (other than than fact that you can't customise it enough). I simply offered the OP a suggestion to change the original UI that she doesn't like and to make the phone faster by removing apps.
To remove LG lock screen :-
1-Go to (/system/build.prop) and open it as a text file .
2-Go to line .
ro.lge.capp_lockscreen=true
And change it to :-
ro.lge.capp_lockscreen=false
--------
Sent From My LG-P920 (ICS Ported)
Try Use THANKS Button If I Helped
Dude that's pretty cool. Just one thing. Mine has a grey bar at the bottom about 20 px tall. Does yours? If not what is causing it? Thanks
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
gordonbennet said:
Dude that's pretty cool. Just one thing. Mine has a grey bar at the bottom about 20 px tall. Does yours? If not what is causing it? Thanks
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my device is "Optimus 3D" and it doesn't have this problem , I thing it's because of resolution (my device 800 x 480) and yours is 1280 x 720 .
Sent From My LG-P920 (ICS Ported)
Try Use THANKS Button If I Helped

[ROM][4.4.4] moto_msm8960 OmniROM

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Overview
OmniROM is pretty close to AOSP, as the 4.4.4 era comes to a close I've decided to post it.
This build has nothing to do with Nobe1976.
It is not his build on Droidrzr forums and was built by me, from source. Although it is likely the same (assuming configs for our device haven't changed much the past year)
Download
Feb/27/2015: OmniROM 4.4.4
KKBL only for now folks!!!
Source
Device
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_motorola_moto_msm8960/tree/cm-11.0
Kernel
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_motorola_msm8960dt-common/tree/cm-11.0
Vendor
https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_motorola/tree/cm-11.0
Yes JJBL people, I will build for you, but I need someone to test so OmniROM aside; IF JBBL people want these firmware I will need a tester :<
Just flashed this on my XT926 and the only issue ive had is when going into Settings>More>Mobile Networks>Carrier Settings The process com.android.phone force closes.
nice rom, works fairly well on my razr m. feels lighter than cyanogenmod and other 4.4.x roms.
lol
Do you know about Lollipop? lol
Working really great on my XT925.. I love OmniRom.. Thanks @Tqr
The fact that this base appeared here means MIUI v6 comes soon
Edit: I'm NOT heading MIUI v6 I am only working as an assistant this is not my era to shine; with that being said if I can't get a JBBL volunteer It's not likely JBBL people will get MIUI v6
kkruglov said:
nice rom, works fairly well on my razr m. feels lighter than cyanogenmod and other 4.4.x roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A lot of people use my MIUI or other fork builds but don't really have the chance to use my source-builds which are almost always nearly 'perfect' (I don't usually post them)
Some compatibility takes a huge hit after I start chopping stuff to pieces so I just wanted to throw this up for people who are the opposite of the MIUI/Lewa/Whatever crowd and just want something as close to 'stock' android as possible.
Tqr said:
but don't really have the chance to use my source-builds which are almost always nearly 'perfect' (I don't usually post them)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why?
kkruglov said:
why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would annoy me if someone ported a ROM I had planned to work on using a base I built.
Tqr said:
The fact that this base appeared here means MIUI v6 comes soon
Edit: I'm NOT heading MIUI v6 I am only working as an assistant this is not my era to shine; with that being said if I can't get a JBBL volunteer It's not likely JBBL people will get MIUI v6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking forward to see MIUI v6! Loved MIUI even since my evo 3d. Hope it comes soon
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using XDA Free mobile app
dulexetina said:
Looking forward to see MIUI v6! Loved MIUI even since my evo 3d. Hope it comes soon
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me too but my build configs are currently not working correctly for some devices.
It's kind of problematic on my end at this point because the past two builds of (pretty much) AOSP have resulted in failure for some unknown reason; even with supported configs.
At the same time to bring a close-to-AOSP ROM to this firmware I had to make a lot of changes in source; changes which may have caused breakage upon building for some devices so I've had to revert everything for this specific build which will probably set the process back a day or two.
But I don't want to sound over-important; the person heading v6 could have(and has) done this fully on their own power without issue and I am really contributing nothing except for build related stuff which isn't even essential It's just to save them time because a lot of time was saved in my life during v5.
It's like they say, someone does something for you and you do something for them if you can; a capacity I'm kind of failing in right now because a lot of the devices I'd like to see get hit with v6 do not have proper source bases
Thanks, very smooth... can you add HDR feature?
ikromy said:
Thanks, very smooth... can you add HDR feature?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, I have to address JBBL right after I finished with the device I'm building for right now.
Like a true piece of scum I neglected the JBBL folks during v5 because I wasn't aware of the exacts surrounding it and frankly was too lazy/busy to produce it.
But from here out all of my builds will also accomodate JBBL now that I know how to deal with it.
I mean it's really like a friend of mine said; that it's better to release broken things at first because If you release something right the first time your topic won't have as many views and as much attention but I've always kind of been a black sheep with my preference for (nearly fully) functional first releases
Edit: I can do MIUIv5 for JBBL if people really still care about it but I'd rather focus on getting things ready for V6, and other projects I'm working on
It's really important that ANY errors with this code-base are brought to my attention , I really do not want to find out there is some inherent error in this when V6 is released It's really important that I do this right so I don't have to bother the developer of it to do yet another build on a rebase.
I feel like I've really annoyed people because I've had multiple peers/friends/co-workers/whatever download firmware that somehow 'wasn't right' this week
Do it. It's been awhile. And that miui phone overseas is killing em softly. I'm on jbbl now to start fresh but if you decide to put out v5 I'll try it. I am ecstatic about v6 to try out.. I will be trying the omni for now. I need a real stable ROM at the moment.
Get lolly miui for mb886.
manuski said:
Do it. It's been awhile. And that miui phone overseas is killing em softly. I'm on jbbl now to start fresh but if you decide to put out v5 I'll try it. I am ecstatic about v6 to try out.. I will be trying the omni for now. I need a real stable ROM at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MIUI v6 is now nearly fully functioning on moto_msm8960 JBBL & KKBL, including V6 camera, scanner and all the other stuff you'd expect.
Unlike being a PatchROM build this is a direct adaptation from a Xiaomi device so there is a level of exclusivity here.
I really don't have the right to release this, It will be part of a friends multi-base thread; It'll show up at some point next month, hopefully.
I wanted to let people who are really anticipating being able to use V6 know that the codebase is finished; it does have all the features you'd expect on true stock MIUI that have never been ported (In this era):
- MIUI camera (Everything, including filters, panorama, fast&slow-motion recording mode...)
- MIUI Scanner (Everything)
- Nearly full native Xiaomi drivers (!)
- Everything, all features
TecknoFreak said:
Get lolly miui for mb886.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's being worked on as well, but 4.4 takes priority because it is literally almost finished.
Tqr said:
MIUI v6 is now nearly fully functioning on moto_msm8960 JBBL & KKBL, including V6 camera, scanner and all the other stuff you'd expect.
Unlike being a PatchROM build this is a direct adaptation from a Xiaomi device so there is a level of exclusivity here.
I really don't have the right to release this, It will be part of a friends multi-base thread; It'll show up at some point next month, hopefully.
I wanted to let people who are really anticipating being able to use V6 know that the codebase is finished; it does have all the features you'd expect on true stock MIUI that have never been ported (In this era):
- MIUI camera (Everything, including filters, panorama, fast&slow-motion recording mode...)
- MIUI Scanner (Everything)
- Nearly full native Xiaomi drivers (!)
- Everything, all features
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is great to hear man! Now I want to try it even more.Can't wait till next month...release it tomorrow MIUI 5 was great,simple and smart,just hope that v6 is gonna be same or even better.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using XDA Free mobile app
Honestly I straight up lied.
MIUI v6 boots with full function except RIL- Because of the nature of this work all builds have been kept closed. I will check with the head of development and ask if beta may begin.
If anyone here feels strong in development and can address RIL both the KKBL and JBBL can have this firmware in the very forseeable future. It's because we use some kind of fked up Generic RIL and I'm not sure where to play Xiaomis invasive code because It's so different.
I do not even know how this device handles RIL in the 4.4 era, if anyone has an understanding of this please be in touch.

Categories

Resources