so i have a samsung vibrant and i do ports from the i 9000 to the vibrant. mymost recent port was built on the mackay kernel. therefore when i created this rom it is extremely laggy since i have it running semaphore. vibrant has no mackay kernel. therefore is it possible to port kernels as i dont know how to build a kernel from source.
if by port u mean like those rom porting method ie copy pasting binaries, no, u cant. u still need to recompile kernel from source.
kernel binary is specific to which device it compiled for, not cross compatible to other device even if the other device is identical.
assuming the sgs and vibrant got similar specs which would make the "port" easier, u need to grab the sgs kernel source u meant to "port", make required changes to it then compile.
thats kernel port, need to recompile from source one way or another.
yeah ive got a LOT of reading to do like for example: learning how to compile, learning what i need in general to create the kernel. thanks man
skinzy98 said:
yeah ive got a LOT of reading to do like for example: learning how to compile, learning what i need in general to create the kernel. thanks man
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should by start by building a simple kernel from proper sources imho
So if there is no actual open source for jellybean for my phone do I download a kernel that's already been built in my phones section and use use that as a base?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
skinzy98 said:
So if there is no actual open source for jellybean for my phone do I download a kernel that's already been built in my phones section and use use that as a base?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't use an existing kernel as "base", you have to getthe aource
Well I got some research to do then because Samsung dropped the vibrant a while ago
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
Pls post all questions here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2103727
XDA university is for guides and all .let's organize things .I hope you understand
Why create a thread for a small question .post in the above thread
mithun46 said:
Pls post all questions here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2103727
XDA university is for guides and all .let's organize things .I hope you understand
Why create a thread for a small question .post in the above thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah sorry I had created this one a while back but nobody seemed to know the answer so I posted it in the XDA university thread and somebody responded
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
skinzy98 said:
Yeah sorry I had created this one a while back but nobody seemed to know the answer so I posted it in the XDA university thread and somebody responded
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. This isn't the first thread which popped up with a question in it.
Edit
Related
I have gotten I9000 ROMs to install on my Cappy before, but now with both of Kenia1234's AMAZING GalaxySENSE/COMB ROMs for the I9000 I get an assert error(Status 7) when I try to flash it in CWM. Why is this? Any solutions would be Awesome!
I honestly dont know anytime about the romsb our the error. Just wondering if it has to do with version of cwm, ie v3 vs v2?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Nerz said:
I honestly dont know anytime about the romsb our the error. Just wondering if it has to do with version of cwm, ie v3 vs v2?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does, and we are supposed to be on CWM 3.X.X.X
Sent from my Cappy rockin' MIUI on Glitch kernel from XDA Premium App
I think you have to have a special kernel for sense/honeycomb for it to work, also are you sure they are CWM installable and which CWM they are compatible with
also if no special kernel is needed make sure you have an I9000 kernel since that is what they are for
Im using a reoriented kernel, specifically for the I9000 Sense port, made to make it work on the Captivate. I'm no noob, not saying anyone is, this just really got my attention cuz I love sense and wanna try Honeycomb out for awhile!
Sent from my Cappy rockin' MIUI on Glitch kernel from XDA Premium App
Moderators plz close thread, figured it out!
b-eock said:
Moderators plz close thread, figured it out!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wouldn't it be better to explain how in detail you did it so there won't have to create another thread for this
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1155898
Use this guide made by me!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Title says it all. I'm thinking we could use x8 undervolt modules.
Undervolt came in x8 before they even started custom kernels!
consegregate said:
Title says it all. I'm thinking we could use x8 undervolt modules.
Undervolt came in x8 before they even started custom kernels!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you remember correctly someone did post the UV modules , just that no one bothered to touch them .
This was sent from a Galaxy Ace. Problem?
CallMeVentus said:
If you remember correctly someone did post the UV modules , just that no one bothered to touch them .
This was sent from a Galaxy Ace. Problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are wrong. Madman_amit developed an undervolt kernel for the ace. He posted it in our group for testing. But undervolting did not yield the expected battery backup. So the project was ditched.
For anyone who wants to try i can post it or request amit to do the same.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
shaaan said:
You are wrong. Madman_amit developed an undervolt kernel for the ace. He posted it in our group for testing. But undervolting did not yield the expected battery backup. So the project was ditched.
For anyone who wants to try i can post it or request amit to do the same.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh he did ?
This was sent from a Galaxy Ace. Problem?
shaaan said:
You are wrong. Madman_amit developed an undervolt kernel for the ace. He posted it in our group for testing. But undervolting did not yield the expected battery backup. So the project was ditched.
For anyone who wants to try i can post it or request amit to do the same.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a shame.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
i had created and i still am using my own custom kernel just haven't posted it on xda and project is not dead at all.. its just that time do not permit me to push development at fast rate as what dragonn is doing.. i do have changed lot of things in my kernel and as stated above uv didn't worked as expected and at time of an0nym0us_ was actively making kernel we did some testing but doesn't look promissing..and to tell you many of the kernel currently in dev section are undervolted (even coolya's official one) but they do not say specifically...
my current custom kernel have several patches from allover but not significant enough to release
Hi,
in next days you will see here a new rom for GS2.
It is based on AOSP, AOKP, CM9 and and other sources + some personnal developpement.
The result is a really usefull and efficient rom that you can use either if you are a developper of an all day base user.
You will find a lot a feature. The rom is fully configurable.
Interested ??
Keep informed
malez said:
Hi,
in next days you will see here a new rom for GS2.
It is based on AOSP, AOKP, CM9 and and other sources + some personnal developpement.
The result is a really usefull and efficient rom that you can use either if you are a developper of an all day base user.
You will find a lot a feature. The rom is fully configurable.
Interested ??
Keep informed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong thread... This is i9100'g' dev forum!!
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
Kingspp said:
Wrong thread... This is i9100'g' dev forum!!
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you ! How can I delete it ?
You cannot delete the thread...its upto moderators to close this thread..
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
Or else you may request a moderator to move this thread to I9100 forum...
I've seen the guide to compiling cm10 but I want to know how to compile AOKP and cherry pick sources. If I use the cm10 guide isn't that just on how to compile cm10. I mean how do you customize that. Does that apply to 4.2.2 thank you for any help provided
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
skinzy98 said:
I've seen the guide to compiling cm10 but I want to know how to compile AOKP and cherry pick sources. If I use the cm10 guide isn't that just on how to compile cm10. I mean how do you customize that. Does that apply to 4.2.2 thank you for any help provided
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there info on building AOKP here maybe it might help i just dont know how helpful http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1798056
Wow this has been helpful for me too
This helped me..:thumbup:
................................................................................................
hi guys
i`ve been on android for long time but dont know so much about developent, i had this phone for like a month now and im waiting to get a stable cm for the device and i read that the problem is that there is no sources for the phone, so just for research, i get in the samsung open source release center and i see many i9070 sources, some of them are JB, my question is, aint those sourses what we need to get a fastest rom development?
sorry if my question is too newbiesh but i just want to know
greetings from mexico
armandow700 said:
hi guys
i`ve been on android for long time but dont know so much about developent, i had this phone for like a month now and im waiting to get a stable cm for the device and i read that the problem is that there is no sources for the phone, so just for research, i get in the samsung open source release center and i see many i9070 sources, some of them are JB, my question is, aint those sourses what we need to get a fastest rom development?
sorry if my question is too newbiesh but i just want to know
greetings from mexico
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, those are kernel sources. Not the chipset sources which we need.
Sent from my GT-I9070
But cm is in development. In developer section you find beta Version. Had some bugs and things that woun't Work. But i use it daily and in my opinion much better than stock jb.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Yes i've tried it and its great but still have no camera working and i need it to set it as my daily rom. And to fix that sourses are needed
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
armandow700 said:
Yes i've tried it and its great but still have no camera working and i need it to set it as my daily rom. And to fix that sourses are needed
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You think devs wouldn't fix it if there are sources, or any other way?
Sent from Galaxy S Advance I9070
Of course devs can fix it without them. But it would be much easer with sourses.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app