Database Develop

Jelly Bean AOSP sources released

Well some hours ago Google released jb into aosp tree..
Matter of hours to get a rom for our phone from our talented devs..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

And we are still waiting for ics
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

CM10 is officially launched, see Google+ CM circle.

Great News. A few doubts though
Lets consider LG releases the ICS update..
I noticed that google released new binary hardware drivers for galaxy nexus and nexus 7.
Does that mean the ICS drivers are not sufficient to run JellyBean???????

We will see...
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

I prefer the excellent custom roms here - so who needs LG (except their needed drivers).
Let's see, who's the first JB-Dev here... :laugh::laugh::laugh:

a big thanks to everyone already who is going to work on custom roms for our beloved device!

shajumohamed said:
Great News. A few doubts though
Lets consider LG releases the ICS update..
I noticed that google released new binary hardware drivers for galaxy nexus and nexus 7.
Does that mean the ICS drivers are not sufficient to run JellyBean???????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nah cyanogenmod already stated that any device supported by cm9 its able to run and will get cm10 aka jbean
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium

but since we are not officially supported we'll have to wait and see what time brings us

crazy_dj said:
but since we are not officially supported we'll have to wait and see what time brings us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are officially supported
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

msedek said:
We are officially supported
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want to complain but crazy dj is right. If we were officially supported we would get official nightlies.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6

ironman159 said:
I don't want to complain but crazy dj is right. If we were officially supported we would get official nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We're something in between.
Other devices who are not officially supported need to port CM on their ROMs - we don't because RC from the CM-Team did that for us - and submits fixes for our device as well.
The reason we don't have nightlies is that CM doesn't add devices which aren't fully running ICS - which we don't.

but he only submits fixes for CM7 doesn't he?

Without the drivers we need a cyanogen release is just pointless we are stuck with gingerbread till lg release the official ics and maybe with an official ics rom a cyanogen jb rom can come from that.

I would be interesting to see if the Hardware Acceleration works with Jelly Bean if we have the official LG ICS Sources... Hope it works. ;-)

tonyp said:
We're something in between.
Other devices who are not officially supported need to port CM on their ROMs - we don't because RC from the CM-Team did that for us - and submits fixes for our device as well.
The reason we don't have nightlies is that CM doesn't add devices which aren't fully running ICS - which we don't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not accurate.. I have a gtab 10.1 running Cm9 nightlies and the tab does not have offial ics yet, same situation... But our dev/maintainer there is pershoot and he care about us... And release nightlies pretty often... Guess RC its just not interested in this phone anymore
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

that's not right since the Honeycomb drivers were ported and already there, in our situation we only have drivers from Froyo poorly ported by LG to Gingerbread. The leap between GB and ICS is way bigger that HC and ICS. Remember that without his work our phone would be not as good as it is with CM9. Also he still has a private life and if he takes a break , fine so be it. He doesn't owe anyone of us anything.
I'm sorry but I just couldn't let it be

oh

good

No, Ace won't be getting new version of Android. Only new releases of 2.3, if there will be any.

Ace was already outdated when it got released.
If you seek updates get a Nexus 4 otherwise use CM10 or stick with GB.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

good

No i think there s no hope for any further update !
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app

inthebank said:
Is there any hope that Samsung will release an update for s5830 and other variations of it?
Gingerbread is great, but with the growing app market I am afraid this phone will be outdated in the next year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude it's hopeless, instead use CM10 or AOKP ROMs by Jellaxy...

Well, we're stuck with unofficial updates, and for rhose there are Wayland, lagloose, imbawind et al to thank. I myself have now Wayland's CM9 RC4.1 with PSN kernel, and am happy with it. Still need to restore some stuff and tweak a bit... But it's stable enough for my daily use
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app

There isn't any hope at all as ace has very low specs, far from the requirements of any 4.0 and 4.1. It has long been announced that official development for it has ceased since CM7.2 Even the official developers don't feel that it is worth the time developing for it. Samsung expected the phone to be a cheap one for all, they released it as a budget phone, so go for custom stock roms, plenty of them are nice looking and can almost mimic the latest versions of android.

[Req] cm 7 based rom

I fully understand devs' work and the philosophy behind developing. And i thank you all devs for your great achievements in mini 2 developement
But, i have a dilema: why did no one tried to develop or port a good old cm 7 rom?
The stock rom is awfaul. It lacks, freezes, reboots... The cm 9-10.1 roms are great, but, let.s face it: untill sammy releasy official jb there is nothing to do
So, why not a cm 7 rom?
I had a galaxy ace once and switching from stock to cm 7 was revelatory...
Please consider my request
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

I have no freezes or reboots on my stock rom... But id like to have cm7

xfim said:
I have no freezes or reboots on my stock rom... But id like to have cm7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
me too
i think we can achieve the best performance that can fit into this device

it would be cool to see cm7, i think all drivers must work on it

cool idea i think that will be the right choice until offical jelly bean come

Glad to see others thinks the same
I think for a dev, porting an cm7 rom is a matter of hours.
I wish i could do that but i don.t know how.
Anyway, i hope that someone will complete this task
Best regards!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

now i'm in exam month in the school for that i'm too busy so i think that iwill start making cm7 rom in 1 jun

My vote for cm7 to!

+1 for Cm 7.2.
Sent from my GT-S6500D using Tapatalk 2

+1 for Cm 7.

+1 for CM7

+1 CM7 :cyclops:

+1
Envoyé depuis mon GT-S7500 avec Tapatalk

+1

File manifest.xml at github.com/CyanogenMod is not working. Trying to fix it and using android git from my github.
News soon...

I think nobody ported it cause CM7 is for Armv6 and Mini 2 is Armv7
Enviado desde mi GT-S6500D usando Tapatalk 2

i don't think so cause it's build on GingerBread and it's stock ROM the deference between the that cm7 lighter slicer faster with root premession
but we will not buildandroid 2.2 or 2.3 we will at least 2.3.6

Andrespro6 said:
I think nobody ported it cause CM7 is for Armv6 and Mini 2 is Armv7
Enviado desde mi GT-S6500D usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really don't think like you. Even S2 in early days had cm7. Now lot of peoples port CM9/10/10.1 and a little bit ports cm7.
Sent from my GT-S6500D using Tapatalk 2

Well, seeing as we'll not get JB, and for that matter a fully working CM10(.1), CM7 seems like a very good idea. With a new stable kernel, without TouchWiz 3.0, and any bloatware, it'll be blazing fast. Plus, the DSP Manager combined with the already awesome stock music experience it'll be more awesome for me. I know it's on the CM 10(.1) but I want a camera damn it! (even though I know it sucks, but it's important kinda for me).

As i said in first post, i really applaud the devs' work on cm 9-10.1, but they (you) have to think that the average noob user (like me) needs a fully working custom rom, even it.s not the latest android update.
So, devs will have our support in developing new roms, in the same giving us a humble cm7 rom for our daily use
I guess that if galaxy ace was running so smoothly with cm7, mini 2 will be lighting faster
And, of course, being arm7 is not an impediment for cm7
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

[Q] Cm11 or Omni Rom 4.4?

CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?

For me there is only CM I`m a big fan since CM 9 ...but i think you should test both and make your own decision what works better for you ...
sorry for this ,but in the end it is subjective where your own preferences are ...
Oliv3go said:
CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

This boils down to personal preference. They won't be the same - CM will have features that Omni doesn't, and vice versa.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk

Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

To test both ? :good:
Oliv3go said:
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Mackay ROM !!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk

Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
jorgecft said:
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

both are good
i think CM11 is a very good rom. i have Mackay KK 4.1.1 on my Galaxy i9000 and it is very very smooth and stable. I also test Mackay Omni rom alpha and i think it is also an interesting Rom.

freakymod2120 said:
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

Sorry i was wrong...you mean the cm updater in CM itself and not the cminstaller for bringing CM to your device with rooting first time and so on ....now it is clear...
Oliv3go said:
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom

M0Rf30 said:
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multi Windows!!!!? if that 's right then this will be the best ROM for i9000.
But omnirom is still in alpha mode with many issues pending to be solved.
CM nightly have very little minor bugs which can be ignored. I love it. I am using cyanAOSP 1.4.0 KitKat ROM based on CM11 and it is awesome.
this is my 100th post, and finally a senior member on XDA. yippie!!!!

I'm not sure that multi windows is going to be much use to us on a 4" screen..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

I think that we will never see multi windows on i9000 anyway...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

Good. It's a stupid idea IMO lol
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures

aris_p said:
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is only so much you can do, especially since you're running firmware intended for stronger devices, with dual and quad cores being the norm for ICS/JB nowadays
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk

Cyanogenmod 9 (ics 4.0)

Hello guys. Today I tried the CyanogenMod 9 ROM based on Android 4.0 (ics). Runs very well, even much better than gingerbread 2.3.6. Unfortunately this rom, since it was never properly developed, there are still bugs like camera, wifi, mobile network seems to me, but others as well. Do you think you could focus on this rom to extrapolate a functional for our mini 2. I state that graphically and functionally would be perfect!
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2

No, because we are centred in CM10.1 , CM10.2 and Kernel 3.4.x
Sent from my GT-S6500D using Tapatalk 2

But why not focus on a perfect rom tor pur device. It's a old version but it is the best. Int work a lot better than 10/10.1/10.2
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2

portagira said:
Hello guys. Today I tried the CyanogenMod 9 ROM based on Android 4.0 (ics). Runs very well, even much better than gingerbread 2.3.6. Unfortunately this rom, since it was never properly developed, there are still bugs like camera, wifi, mobile network seems to me, but others as well. Do you think you could focus on this rom to extrapolate a functional for our mini 2. I state that graphically and functionally would be perfect!
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with both of you and everyone like you i tried cm9 so so so so so much better and smooth and graphics what i say about performance? oh god it's fly high really really the best rom for mini 2 and the games run very smoothly and for me and for all mini2 users we just need android 4 not more than that cuz most of apps now required android 4+ and that is what we talking about cm9 3.4 kernel updated with latest cm9 files and library files and latest adreno 200 updates and our Qualcomm MSM7227a support android 4 so we can get the latest drivers and updates and that what we missing in the newer android versions and the resolution supported what ever i said i will not finished believe me it is the perfect version of android for our jena jena need ICS CM9 +1 who is with us
portagira said:
But why not focus on a perfect rom tor pur device. It's a old version but it is the best. Int work a lot better than 10/10.1/10.2
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2

I would really like to see it happen ! Ultra stable cm with all features working perfectly (now cm10.1 is best so far but still there are tons of bugs )

I think there is a reason why TheWhisp didn't want to pursue this matter ..maybe because samsung announced the official jb for our phone(that turned out to be a lie...) or maybe because cm9 has a lot of bugs ..and most of them were fixed in jb ..idk , or ics requires a lot of libs and stuff that are not avalible ..unlike jb. Idk , I would like to see a very fast,stable and fully functional cm ..so, good luck !

Why not making a fully working CM7.2 for our device?

I think make a full working cm9 is like when thewhisp worked on cm10/10.1
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2

let someone else do the CM9
someone who knows how to do, it does not have to be a whisp
or let some ports of a device rom and make CM9

We just have to face the fact that : WE NEED MORE DEVELOPERS IN GM2
you cant expect from one guy to make everything for you
and we had a non-functional cm7 past month but the dev droped it

I cannot work on 6+ projects at the same time. At the moment I focus on cm-11 and cm-10.2, and 3.4.x kernel. If you want cm10 and cm10.1 in the same level as cm-10.2, you have to say good-bye to camera. That's why I don't release any updates for those ROMs. Try thinking for once, not spam about every ROM you want.

What do you think people about this rom?
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2

portagira said:
What do you think people about this rom?
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it would be great for me i think it is the best idea for mini 2 development and best rom compatibility for jena
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2

NiceIceDice96 said:
I think it would be great for me i think it is the best idea for mini 2 development and best rom compatibility for jena
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would agree
we need to find someone to finish CM9

Thewisp we pray you. This is the Best rom forma our phone. A lotta of people want it

Revival CM 9
It's laudable attempt to convince you The Whisp to focus on a CM who can bring added value to the phone and that works really. Unfortunately The Whisp is used to finish something once you start. It works only on projects illusory .... He even told you that working on 6 projects simultaneously. How many of them go really well and can say that achieve perfection? None! Too bad! It's a good developer but is inconstant. The romanian people have a saying: "Good cheese, rough diamond." That's The Whisp!

Guyz he said he is doing this for himself and sharing it with us just come down and believe me
ICS sucks
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
---------- Post added at 05:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------
And I believe that cm11 will be awesome as it is optimized for low ram devices
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

darkmanz said:
Guyz he said he is doing this for himself and sharing it with us just come down and believe me
ICS sucks
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
---------- Post added at 05:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------
And I believe that cm11 will be awesome as it is optimized for low ram devices
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh common it is not ram problem it is more like resolution camera processor belive me
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2

Sando_Khan said:
It's laudable attempt to convince you The Whisp to focus on a CM who can bring added value to the phone and that works really. Unfortunately The Whisp is used to finish something once you start. It works only on projects illusory .... He even told you that working on 6 projects simultaneously. How many of them go really well and can say that achieve perfection? None! Too bad! It's a good developer but is inconstant. The romanian people have a saying: "Good cheese, rough diamond." That's The Whisp!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MSM7x27a also has official support for Android 4.1. Just out of curiosity, I made a CM10 build with the latest changes from CM-10.2 builds (it uses everything that an official 4.1 ROM from Samsung would bring us), I'd it's not quite faster that the 4.3. If you really want your device to perform at its best, stick with 2.3
I have used GT-S6312 with Samsung's official 4.1.2 Touchwiz'ed Android and it is terribly slow. No wonder Samsung cancelled the update for Mini 2.
And an ICS ROM would have the same problems as any other CM ROM - crappy camera performance, white screen issue would persist etc.

TheWhisp said:
MSM7x27a also has official support for Android 4.1. Just out of curiosity, I made a CM10 build with the latest changes from CM-10.2 builds (it uses everything that an official 4.1 ROM from Samsung would bring us), I'd it's not quite faster that the 4.3. If you really want your device to perform at its best, stick with 2.3
I have used GT-S6312 with Samsung's official 4.1.2 Touchwiz'ed Android and it is terribly slow. No wonder Samsung cancelled the update for Mini 2.
And an ICS ROM would have the same problems as any other CM ROM - crappy camera performance, white screen issue would persist etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay bring it and please can you build cm9 too with the same changes and updates
edit: and what do you mean that cm10 faster or cm10.2
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2