Can I root my XZ with Kingo root? - Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Android version 4.2.2 (10.3.1.A.2.67)
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app

xdaorxan said:
Android version 4.2.2 (10.3.1.A.2.67)
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why do not u try on ?
I could always root my device

xdaorxan said:
Android version 4.2.2 (10.3.1.A.2.67)
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just did, though, there are rumours saying that something is wrong with, too lazy to dig in, but it does the job, flawlessly I must say.

Yes you can, but theres a lot discussion about kingo root
Sent from my GT-P5110 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

It will root your phone, but will collect and send a lot of data to China in order to do so.
Kingo claim that they no longer collect your IMEI, but say nothing about device ID/serial numbers etc that they have been caught sending unencrypted to their server before.
I do not trust them at all and the fact that their app is currently not allowed on XDA says a lot.
Edit - Also, the guy saying he is too lazy to find out what is wrong with the Kingo app is just the sort of person that creators of malware rely upon to both use and propagate their apps. Laziness is no excuse to use and recommend use of questionable software, ever.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk

kingvortex said:
It will root your phone, but will collect and send a lot of data to China in order to do so.
Kingo claim that they no longer collect your IMEI, but say nothing about device ID/serial numbers etc that they have been caught sending unencrypted to their server before.
I do not trust them at all and the fact that their app is currently not allowed on XDA says a lot.
Edit - Also, the guy saying he is too lazy to find out what is wrong with the Kingo app is just the sort of person that creators of malware rely upon to both use and propagate their apps. Laziness is no excuse to use and recommend use of questionable software, ever.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, you sound butthurt really, I did not recommend it in the very first place, I just said that it does the job, and in my case, flawlessly, I don't know about you, but for your kind information,, I have been using doomlord method since the good old x10 days, but recently it doesn't work, so, I have no choice but to resort to kingo, what other choice do I have left? Well maybe there is, but kingo happen to stumble upon me. I never did said that he should be doing the same, but since he was asking, and I happen to have gone through it, I just said it, I even said that they were kind of suspicious, but just wanna let you know, the way you reply doesn't help that much either.
Thanks, and have a nice day

I really don't care what you did to your phone, but suspicious software that is banned from this site is not 'flawless'.
I posted merely to make sure that anyone with any sense that viewed this thread knew of its suspicious nature and stayed away from it.
Finally, just because you are unable to follow the simple instructions for DooMLoRD's method for rooting 67, doesn't mean it doesn't work. It works just fine for me and thousands of others.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk

kingvortex said:
I really don't care what you did to your phone, but suspicious software that is banned from this site is not 'flawless'.
I posted merely to make sure that anyone with any sense that viewed this thread knew of its suspicious nature and stayed away from it.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not banned, look properly, where do you think I found the thing if it's not here, no use of prolonging our argument when I think you don't know what you are talking about.

bloodsuckingcomputer said:
It is not banned, look properly, where do you think I found the thing if it's not here, no use of prolonging our argument when I think you don't know what you are talking about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47188994
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47277653
Has it been officially announced by a moderator/admin that it is now allowed to be linked to on XDA? If so, please link me to it as I would be interested to see when/how issues were resolved.
Thanks in advance.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk

kingvortex said:
Really?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47188994
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47277653
Has it been officially announced by a moderator/admin that it is now allowed to be linked to on XDA? If so, please link me to it as I would be interested to see when/how issues were resolved.
Thanks in advance.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There you go
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2460745
Oh god, I miss the good old days, and I'm done here.And please do click on the link provided. And see for yourself where does it lead you to. So much for banned tools eh?

bloodsuckingcomputer said:
There you go
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2460745
Oh god, I miss the good old days, and I'm done here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know what you think you proved by linking that thread. It's the same one I linked you to already.
The final post in the thread is by gangsterjoop, a moderator, saying that the tool is not allowed.
Please go and read it again. Carefully this time.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=47188994&postcount=79
I also miss the old days, when this place wasn't overrun by people that are unable to comprehend things properly before trying to score some sort of worthless victory over somebody that actually knows and double checks what they're talking about before they post.
Edit - I reported that thread as it appeared that links to Kingo had been left in the OP by mistake. The links have now been removed.
Hopefully this will stop the spread of it until they have stopped collecting data from their users.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk

kingo and doomlord
They both work fine on mine (unlocked bootloader)
Kingo just less hassle

kirk0263 said:
They both work fine on mine (unlocked bootloader)
Kingo just less hassle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have an unlocked bootloader. Why are you using dodgy tools to root? You could just flash a modified kernel.
Honestly, I wonder why some people are actually members of this site when they do things like this....
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk

I think kinogoapp is for those who are new to Android ,and dont will use time and affort finding solution here
xperia z , meow 3.4 / beanstalk 4.4008

Related

A ROM with tablet mode ?

Hi. I've searched a few threads and I seem to can't find a ROM with tablet mode or even enable tablet mode? Is there one out there I just can't find?
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
you can enable it in the build.prop.
use google
Glebun said:
you can enable it in the build.prop.
use google
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks I'll have a look
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
Just googled it and tried most methods suggested but didn't work.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
they you did something wrong.
Do you care to help then?
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
You just haven't looked enough
Paranoid Android actually makes that a "selling" point:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
kaynpayn said:
You just haven't looked enough
Paranoid Android actually makes that a "selling" point:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're in the i9305 section.
OP, no, I can't help you, because you provided zero information about what exactly you did and what's the problem
How hard is it? This is a forum if you cant Handley people asking for help maybe you shouldn't be on here. I simply want tablet mode. If you can't help don't tell me to go to Google.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
no, I WILL tell you to use google, because you're not special, this has been discussed numerous times, and all the information is out there, you're limited just by your laziness. check the first rule of xda
Glebun said:
no, I WILL tell you to use google, because you're not special, this has been discussed numerous times, and all the information is out there, you're limited just by your laziness. check the first rule of xda
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Errmmm. I have searched and I have tried everything I found which I already said. Therefore I ask a question on the forums, if I'm not mistaken that is what they were created for no? Discussing, questions, general talk ect....
And kindly NO I will not use Google anymore I have every right to ask for help on this forum thank you
Now if you would kindly move along since you're not helping me at all
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
have you read my replies? you provided ZERO information about the exact actions you took, how are we supposed to help you? you didn't even say which step went wrong.
and if you refuse to google - you're not welcome here. have you checked the first rule of xda?
Glebun said:
have you read my replies? you provided ZERO information about the exact actions you took, how are we supposed to help you? you didn't even say which step went wrong.
and if you refuse to google - you're not welcome here. have you checked the first rule of xda?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude what the ****. I have googled I said that numerous times. And I tried every method I seen. If you're a big Google man you should Google yourself and see which methods are shown for the I9305....
Kindly do me a favor and pee off because you're driving me up the wall mate.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
Glebun said:
no, I WILL tell you to use google, because you're not special, this has been discussed numerous times, and all the information is out there, you're limited just by your laziness. check the first rule of xda
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said. :good:
aussiesausage said:
Dude what the ****. I have googled I said that numerous times. And I tried every method I seen. If you're a big Google man you should Google yourself and see which methods are shown for the I9305....
Kindly do me a favor and pee off because you're driving me up the wall mate.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you even read my posts? say EXACTLY what you did if you expect any help

[Q] How to install mods on a new Xperia Z?

So yesterday I found out about this modification that allows me to take pictures with the volume key button (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2266208). I really wanted this feature, but had no clue what "flash one of the MOD with CWM RECOVERY" meant.
It being my first time, I totally failed haha. I installed a bunch of apps including ROM manager, fastboot etc and I somehow got my phone rooted and CWM recovery working (I think), but update.zip was missing. Tried several ROMs on my SD card, which didn't work. Ultimately, I ended up putting my phone into the horrifying bootloop and I had to wipe the entire phone with software update.
My phone stats:
Model number: C6603
Android version: 4.1.2
Build number: 10.1.1.A.1.253
I have no clue if my phone is locked or unlocked.
My question: how do I install this modification, preferably with a step by step guide from a clean Xperia Z? Thanks in advance!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2275632
If you were on 253 from the beginning, you probably never rooted your device because there is no exploit for 253. To root 253 you have to downgrade to 434. Also use Check Root to confirm if your device is rooted before you go trigger happy with apps,
krishter said:
If you were on 253 from the beginning, you probably never rooted your device because there is no exploit for 253. To root 253 you have to downgrade to 434. Also use Check Root to confirm if your device is rooted before you go trigger happy with apps,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't post out of date information. You no longer have to downgrade to root.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2327472
That will root 253.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
I stand corrected. The OP in that did not confirm that it had been tested on 253 but seems like some of the members did get it to work.
kingvortex said:
Please don't post out of date information. You no longer have to downgrade to root.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2327472
That will root 253.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its not confirmed that its tested on. .253. But kingvortex keeps saying that ! Maybe he rooted.the firmware him self . Its confirmed that it works for .343 and. 307
Anyway flashing a firmware is very easy and it takes less than 5 min
Just as a side I think hiding the thanks meter will do good for alot of members
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
fish droid said:
Yes its not confirmed that its tested on. .253. But kingvortex keeps saying that ! Maybe he rooted.the firmware him self . Its confirmed that it works for .343 and. 307
Anyway flashing a firmware is very easy and it takes less than 5 min
Just as a side I think hiding the thanks meter will do good for alot of members
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=42903950
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=42818008
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=42826701
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=42834640
Confirmed enough for you?
Please check your facts before trying to call me out for no reason.
Yes, I agree. The thanks meter should be disabled for those desperately trying to fill it by reposting information without crediting sources and not checking facts before posting.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
Only 2 guys confirmed it without problems and when I post I talk about something I tested my self to be sure about it not only cut and paste a thread
Find a thread that doomlord confirmed it
And I think members who fill their thanks meter by attacking amateur members should hide the posts that they get their thanks from
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
fish droid said:
Only 2 guys confirmed it without problems and when I post I talk about something I tested my self to be sure about it not only cut and paste a thread
And I think members who fill their thanks meter by attacking amateur members should hide the posts that they get their thanks from
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Listen dude. Just stop grasping at straws. The tool roots 253 just fine. The remount reboot problem is nothing to do with that. That problem is caused by the RIC service and is nothing to do with Doomlord's tool at all.
Do some research before embarrassing yourself further.
You are the one that decided to try and act clever by coming in here and questioning my post before you had even checked if I was correct or not, purely because I have corrected you for posting incorrect information in other threads. If you think that's "attacking" you, then feel free to report my posts and let a mod decide.
In any case, just stop. You are only making yourself look bad here and I'm not concerned what you think about me.
Are we clear?
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
kingvortex said:
Listen dude. Just stop grasping at straws. The tool roots 253 just fine. The remount reboot problem is nothing to do with that. That problem is caused by the RIC service and is nothing to do with Doomlord's tool at all.
Do some research before embarrassing yourself further.
You are the one that decided to try and act clever by coming in here and questioning my post before you had even checked if I was correct or not, purely because I have corrected you for posting incorrect information in other threads.
Just stop. You are only making yourself look bad here and I'm not concerned what you think about me.
Are we clear?
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you put.yourself in a defencive postion. I was just saying that you dont have to take anyone post for granted unless its from the developer himself
Why you are attacking everyone. you are here to help
And about all of this talk about me making myself look bad I will not reply and I will not take it personal but you should take it easy
Now we are clear "mate"
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
fish droid said:
Why you put.yourself in a defencive postion. I was just saying that you dont have to take anyone post for granted unless its from the developer himself
Why you are attacking everyone. you are here to help
And about all of this talk about me making myself look bad I will not reply and I will not take it personal but you should take it easy
Now we are clear "mate"
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=42659579
Doomlord says it may work on 253, which is then subsequently confirmed by multiple people later in the thread. What is hard to understand here?
You posted purely to try and discredit me because I have picked you up on posting information that is blatantly wrong in other threads. You failed. Accept it and move on.
And yes, I will defend my position from somebody that has decided to start some sort of childish feud for no reason other than they feel insulted that somebody corrected them.
End of discussion, so feel free to get the last word if it will make you feel better.
Have a good day.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
kingvortex said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=42659579
Doomlord says it may work on 253, which is then subsequently confirmed by multiple people later in the thread. What is hard to understand here?
You posted purely to try and discredit me because I have picked you up on posting information that is blatantly wrong in other threads. You failed. Accept it and move on.
And yes, I will defend my position from somebody that has decided to start some sort of childish feud for no reason other than they feel insulted that somebody corrected them.
End of discussion, so feel free to get the last word if it will make you feel better.
Have a good day.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont feel insulted if someone proved me wrong.
Actually if you proved me wrong I am mature.enough.to thank you and admit it because this will be helpful for me to develop and everyone
but you havent.
And by.the way since you are british the "may" word is not a confirmation
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app

[REQ] Honami sys dump

Please share link to full system dump
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Extract it from any ftf you can find.
Sent from my C6603 using xda premium
Have not seen any tft and have not idea how extract
Ty for nothing
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
No one is gonna share the system dump as stated several times before.
Just my 0.2 cent!
SEARCH before posting... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=43059040&postcount=328
ZeroInfinity said:
SEARCH before posting... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=43059040&postcount=328
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here re not any dump image or tft. Even if is not public someone can post on pw link.
Please read topic before answer!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Wampcia said:
Here re not any dump image or tft. Even if is not public someone can post on pw link.
Please read topic before answer!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the reason WHY it is not allowed to be shared to the public, it will NOT be shared in the public for these reasons. I have read the topic name obviously, I'm just giving you the REASON WHY it is not allowed to be shared to the public AT ALL!
Obviously it's not the link for the dump or ftf file...
Reason is one noone want share, becouse do not want. I.m understand it and it is standart.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Wampcia said:
Reason is one noone want share, becouse do not want. I.m understand it and it is standart.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not at all, we would share but there is a good reason for it (Read the post again!)
System dump can't just be shared with everyone. It's an unreleased device so a leak always means a risk for someone to be kicked out by Sony.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you want someone to lose their job just so you can have a leaked System Dump shared publicly?
Do I`m - `All` or full public. U re funny. Ty for nothin !
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Wow. What's with the influx of people recently that come here and talk **** to everyone then still expect anyone to help them?
To the OP - A little manners and courtesy go a long way. Several people have said why you will not get what you are asking for. Accept it and move on.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
Totally agree with kingvortex!
Remember, everything on xda is for free, so you can at least give a little respect to people who try to help you.
People like you are the reason why many devs discontinue their work. People always demand and don't think about other people spending their free time just to help.
sturmtruppler said:
Totally agree with kingvortex!
Remember, everything on xda is for free, so you can at least give a little respect to people who try to help you.
People like you are the reason why many devs discontinue their work. People always demand and don't think about other people spending their free time just to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, people that think like we do are becoming lost in the sea of self entitled noobs that have swamped these forums with the increased popularity of Android and modding.
They refuse to search or read before posting or show any respect to people that give their time for free to develop better software for their device.
Sad really.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 2
I have asked about link. You have not shared me, but harrased, thats all story.
I have not asked about dev becouse most of it i can do self. What i ca not self, can not and im not ineresting asked becouse i know answer, answer very friendly like this
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
You are crazy guy, they says they can't so they can't. Get the zip available or wait to buy the device.
Do you think you are special so they give it to you and not to other well know and respected devs around, what garanti they have that you won't post elsewhere ?
Wampcia said:
I have asked about link. You have not shared me, but harrased, thats all story.
I have not asked about dev becouse most of it i can do self. What i ca not self, can not and im not ineresting asked becouse i know answer, answer very friendly like this
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stop being ignorant & try to understand the risks involved in sharing the system dump. They are not sharing the dump even to the recognized developers:crying: Also if you keep on replying like a 7yr old, every one is gonna ignore your reply.
Chin up & change your thread title to closed or ask a mod via pm.
:good:
thalada said:
Stop being ignorant & try to understand the risks involved in sharing the system dump. They are not sharing the dump even to the recognized developers:crying: Also if you keep on replying like a 7yr old, every one is gonna ignore your reply.
Chin up & change your thread title to closed or ask a mod via pm.
:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I have clear response, nothing more I do not want here I have clear point of view where I am and do not care in this situation about some files.
I have very rare asking about something, I m reading, reading and I promisse I ll never ask here about anything
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Alright, better than stop everyone!
When you cross when a situation like this, when you think that something it's wrong (attitude, request, rule break, etc.) report it don't try to fix the situation by yourselves.
Please keep in mind this, thread closed...

[Q] Walkman widget. But with different background.

With all the tech genius on the forum I was wondering if anyone could change the stock Walkman widget a little. Basically it's a bit out of place on my home screen with its dark background as all my widgets have no background.
Could it be changed to clear? Before its mentioned, no I don't want to use a different widget for it. I like the Walkman one.
I'm running Xperia Launcher 2.0.5b found on the forum. I can't find the link to the thread again though. I'm on a C6603, 4.1.2, locked bootloader.
I'm using the launcher as I like the extra little bit of customisation over the stock home. But would go back if needed
I hope someone can help.
Thanks
I am bitterly disappointed with the lack of knowledge. Maybe xda isn't what people make it out to be.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Kirkymole said:
I am bitterly disappointed with the lack of knowledge. Maybe xda isn't what people make it out to be.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not like someone is gonna run and do whatever you want just because.
DrKrFfXx said:
It is not like someone is gonna run and do whatever you want just because.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because what...? This is a forum, for people to share, request and discuss mods. Seems every other twat round here demands and gets... Thought I'd give it a go.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
OP, this is not what XDA is about, please read this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=16682226&postcount=2441
Let me quote certain points about what you are minsunderstanding about XDA developers:
XDA is and always will be about the developers.
XDA is not a place to come and make your phone cool.
XDA IS a place to come to learn and share your knowledge. If you are not here for those reasons then you are here for the wrong ones.
I have watched XDA become a place where every dumbass in the world has a smartphone and comes here thinking they have the right to anything. Well guess what? You dont have the right to ****. We share it because we want to and we dont if we dont feel like it. Are the Developers or the Mods required to make you happy? Nope not in the least. Wanna leave. Go ahead. I beg you, please do. The less people that are asking dumb question cause they dont know what they are doing (this is understood when your new, but at least look) or are too lazy to look for it the better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If no one responds your request, that does not mean they lack the knowledge in doing it. Demanding things will get you nowhere. If no developer wants to do what you request, then move on. Xda is not about doing what people want developers to do.
ZeroInfinity said:
OP, this is not what XDA is about, please read this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=16682226&postcount=2441
Let me quote certain points about what you are minsunderstanding about XDA developers:
If no one responds your request, that does not mean they lack the knowledge in doing it. Demanding things will get you nowhere. If no developer wants to do what you request, then move on. Xda is not about doing what people want developers to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe that message needs to be shared amongst a fair majority of users of XDA....
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Kirkymole said:
Maybe that message needs to be shared amongst a fair majority of users of XDA....
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So people should have to be prompted not to act like an entitled noob that stamps their feet like a child if they don't get what they want?
How about they should just behave in a decent manner to begin with?
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
And in what way have I stamped my feet? Might I remind your highness that everyone is a noob at some point.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Kirkymole said:
And in what way have I stamped my feet? Might I remind your highness that everyone is a noob at some point.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, let's see....
Kirkymole said:
I am bitterly disappointed with the lack of knowledge. Maybe xda isn't what people make it out to be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kirkymole said:
Seems every other twat round here demands and gets... Thought I'd give it a go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even though I was talking in general about your suggestion that everyone should need to be told how to behave properly (they already are, by the way, in the forum rules, read them), is that a proper way to behave when you're asking for help from people that work for free? Or even the proper way to behave in public? I think not.
As for everyone being a noob to begin with; that does not entitle anyone to behave inappropriately and ***** and moan if they don't get what they demand.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4

Is AOSP still a problem?

Are people still getting hard aosp bricks?
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
flimsy888 said:
Are people still getting hard aosp bricks?
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Until an actual problem has been found and a solution has been explained I would say yes. (HINT: Neither of these has happened).
Kraizk said:
Until an actual problem has been found and a solution has been explained I would say yes. (HINT: Neither of these has happened).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh shut it
no one knows for sure what caused the bricks
no one hasnt gotten bricks in months
flex360 said:
oh shut it
no one knows for sure what caused the bricks
no one hasnt gotten bricks in months
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bite me tool. Until someone finds the issue or can confirm it is fixed/not aosp related it is a real risk
flex360 said:
oh shut it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't get this? If 99.9% of hard bricks are on CM with stock kernel there is a problem.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Konfuzion said:
Don't get this? If 99.9% of hard bricks are on CM with stock kernel there is a problem.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
99.9% of hardbricks huh
how many people reported hard bricks ...... 4
how many people flash aosp roms 1000s
flex360 said:
99.9% of hardbricks huh
how many people reported hard bricks ...... 4
how many people flash aosp roms 1000s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A problem's still a problem no matter how small. You tend to come across as dickish.
sshede said:
A problem's still a problem no matter how small. You tend to come across as dickish.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so sensitive. speaking the truth is dickish nowadays huh
flex360 said:
so sensitive. speaking the truth is dickish nowadays huh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Childish as well, but off topic. I will not continue further with you.
To the OP:
Considering that some people who flashed AOSP based roms ended up with hard bricks, I would advise against flashing AOSP based roms. However, the choice is yours.
flex360 said:
99.9% of hardbricks huh
how many people reported hard bricks ...... 4
how many people flash aosp roms 1000s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Way more than 4, but based on your responses I will get further having a conversation with my 2 year old so I'm not going to take the time to link all the bricks.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
flimsy888 said:
Are people still getting hard aosp bricks?
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as the op asked
Are people still getting hard aosp bricks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
short answer: no
the rest of you can talk all you want. but people are no getting hard bricks anymore
ive been running paranoid android for weeks now, as with countless other people running other aosp roms
i could care less what you guys wanna think or say
im the only one who answered the question correctly.
truth/fact/what?
I finally bit the bullet and flashed a Pac Man nightly a couple days ago. I only tooled around for an hour or so before flashing back to d3rpOne though.
Way too many soft bricks lately, but I feel like the earth-shattering-brick days with CM/AOSP are behind us.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
I flash aosp ROMs daily lol addicted but no problems...
Sent from my One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I am aware no official fix was ever found, I was asking if anyone had bricked in the past months.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
flimsy888 said:
I am aware no official fix was ever found, I was asking if anyone had bricked in the past months.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the past months is a fairly broad net. It seems to have quieted down as of late, but as always it's a "at your own risk" sort of deal. It certainly doesn't hurt to check some of the suspected problem spots if you do flash though (such as your proc min/max frequencies).
flex360 said:
as the op asked
short answer: no
the rest of you can talk all you want. but people are no getting hard bricks anymore
ive been running paranoid android for weeks now, as with countless other people running other aosp roms
i could care less what you guys wanna think or say
im the only one who answered the question correctly.
truth/fact/what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you didn't, you gave limited information about a serious problem.
---------- Post added at 08:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:45 AM ----------
flimsy888 said:
I am aware no official fix was ever found, I was asking if anyone had bricked in the past months.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I know of 1 brick. NOTE: Brick is not a term I use when a moron wipes their internal storage. Brick when I use it means the device does not charge, power on, hboot or anything else.
Kraizk said:
No you didn't, you gave limited information about a serious problem.
---------- Post added at 08:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:45 AM ----------
Yes, I know of 1 brick. NOTE: Brick is not a term I use when a moron wipes their internal storage. Brick when I use it means the device does not charge, power on, hboot or anything else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please explain how i gave limited information
he asked if anyone had bricks as of lately, i said no
what else needs to be explained? did he ask what were the causes of the issue? no
you cant win this discussion. just give up.
flex360 said:
please explain how i gave limited information
he asked if anyone had bricks as of lately, i said no
what else needs to be explained? did he ask what were the causes of the issue? no
you cant win this discussion. just give up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey tool read the entire post and response. I know of one a month ago, that right there is valid enough. ALSO he did not specify a time frame in the original post, just if it was still a "problem" so yes it is a problem. You are a worthless cook and a tool, anything you say has no credibility, anybody willing to listen to you deserves anything and everything that happens to their phone.
Kraizk said:
Hey tool read the entire post and response. I know of one a month ago, that right there is valid enough. ALSO he did not specify a time frame in the original post, just if it was still a "problem" so yes it is a problem. You are a worthless cook and a tool, anything you say has no credibility, anybody willing to listen to you deserves anything and everything that happens to their phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha nice one
"a worthless cook and a tool"
i could care less about what you have to say. if you read the bottom of the op in my rom thread you can see i dont care what anyone things of me. so all this name calling and stuff are in vain man
you didnt even answer the op's question. i did
no one has gotten bricks recently lol. chill out and calm down. stop taking xda so seriously lol
go out and have some fun later tonight and release some stress. i know i got you all mad and worked up lol.
flex360 said:
haha nice one
"a worthless cook and a tool"
i could care less about what you have to say. if you read the bottom of the op in my rom thread you can see i dont care what anyone things of me. so all this name calling and stuff are in vain man
you didnt even answer the op's question. i did
no one has gotten bricks recently lol. chill out and calm down. stop taking xda so seriously lol
go out and have some fun later tonight and release some stress. i know i got you all mad and worked up lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone got a brick recently, a month ago tops Good on ya' champ. Keep it classy

Categories

Resources