I just noticed that my MX isn't seeing my 5GHz wifi.
Is it just my phone that needs to go back or has anyone else had this problem?
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I get my Netgear's 5GHz wifi to appear and can connect to it as well. I'm on the Dev Edition if that helps.
Is there a way for you to check if another device can see the 5GHz wifi?
Check what channel your 5ghz is on. I used wifi analyzer and under channels I noticed only certain ones were checked. I changed my router to one of those and it works great.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
Your 5Ghz will have shorter range than 2.4. Are you fairly close to the router or access point?
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
Yeah, my GS3 had no problems seeing and connecting to my 5GHZ network. Seems like it might be a hardware thing.
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
My Moto X seems to do extremely well with 5ghz wifi. Way better that my former Samsung GS2. Much better range in particular, though still not as good as 2.4 ghz. However, this phone may have issues with some routers as I have problems with 2.4 ghz wifi and my netgear WNDR3700 as referenced here, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2433041&highlight=wifi+issues
I should also point out I have very little 5 ghz interference, but many neighboring 2.4 ghz access points. This is on small lots, not in an apartment so its still mostly ok.
Make sure the 5 GHz radio in enabled under Settings > WiFi > Advanced > Wifi frequency band
Yeah, I might have to get my phone changed out. My laptop is connected to 5ghz but my phone won't even see it.
**Edit**
So while looking at Wifi Analyzer, I realized that my phone doesn't support anything below channel 149 on the 5GHZ range. Mine is fancy wireless
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Odd. My phone performs flawlessly on ch 36, and is much, much better than my Galaxy Note... You might have a defective unit or a bad routet.
Sent from my Moto X
I was using channel 36 and had no issues with the rest of my devices. Must just be my phone.
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
My phone works on 5, but only if I force it. Otherwise it chooses 2.4. 10 feet from the router
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
murso74 said:
My phone works on 5, but only if I force it. Otherwise it chooses 2.4. 10 feet from the router
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a reason for that.
When your phone scans for a WiFi network, it scans through 11 wireless channels on 2.4Ghz (in the US). When your phone scans for 5Ghz it has more channels to scan through, 13-15 depending on your router.
That combined with already mentioned reasons such as better 2.4Ghz propagation in homes/offices makes it easier for the phone to connect. Whether 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz, every gain increase of 3dBm doubles transmit power. In one given spot with your router in another room, your 2.4Ghz signal is typically going to be stronger. It is going to choose the 2.4Ghz because the phone scanned and saw it, and the signal was strong.
grenefroggie said:
There is a reason for that.
When your phone scans for a WiFi network, it scans through 11 wireless channels on 2.4Ghz (in the US). When your phone scans for 5Ghz it has more channels to scan through, 13-15 depending on your router.
That combined with already mentioned reasons such as better 2.4Ghz propagation in homes/offices makes it easier for the phone to connect. Whether 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz, every gain increase of 3dBm doubles transmit power. In one given spot with your router in another room, your 2.4Ghz signal is typically going to be stronger. It is going to choose the 2.4Ghz because the phone scanned and saw it, and the signal was strong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm embarrassed I didn't think of that actually... Thanks for the refresher
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
I just removed my password from my g network, the motor x's range is good enough to cover my whole house on n.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
murso74 said:
I'm embarrassed I didn't think of that actually... Thanks for the refresher
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup. i ended up forgetting my 2.4 bands in favor of the 5. now i'm upset that nothing else in my house uses the 5.
There is also a chance that depending on the cell band and frequency your phone is using it may disable certain wifi channels as they may interfere with each other. I know depending on certain cell/wifi/bt combos various power levels in the phone are reduced, I wouldn't doubt there are other rules in play as well.
Steve-x said:
There is also a chance that depending on the cell band and frequency your phone is using it may disable certain wifi channels as they may interfere with each other. I know depending on certain cell/wifi/bt combos various power levels in the phone are reduced, I wouldn't doubt there are other rules in play as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the US, 2100Mhz and 2500Mhz are the closest freqs used near a WiFi router. Channel 11 is 2462Mhz, with 3 more channels left before hitting 2.5Ghz. No carrier to my knowledge uses 5Ghz. DFS starts at 5260 to 5700.
However, BT uses 2.4Ghz, though the radio in your router likely has more output power and will force the BT to change the channel it is on.
grenefroggie said:
In the US, 2100Mhz and 2500Mhz are the closest freqs used near a WiFi router. Channel 11 is 2462Mhz, with 3 more channels left before hitting 2.5Ghz. No carrier to my knowledge uses 5Ghz. DFS starts at 5260 to 5700.
However, BT uses 2.4Ghz, though the radio in your router likely has more output power and will force the BT to change the channel it is on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is way more in play then that. When a radio transmits on 850 Mhz is also transmits a lower power carrier at 1900 Mhz (known as harmonics) They are greatly reduced in power level but if they are right beside the receiver(as the case would be in a cell phone) it can cause problems. With all the possible bands a phone can transmit and receive on there will always be combinations of harmonics that will reduce the performance of other receivers in the phone. It is also possible to have further issues from mixing products but I won't go into that here.
Steve-x said:
There is way more in play then that. When a radio transmits on 850 Mhz is also transmits a lower power carrier at 1900 Mhz (known as harmonics) They are greatly reduced in power level but if they are right beside the receiver(as the case would be in a cell phone) it can cause problems. With all the possible bands a phone can transmit and receive on there will always be combinations of harmonics that will reduce the performance of other receivers in the phone. It is also possible to have further issues from mixing products but I won't go into that here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. I didn't really think to mention harmonics, as most people do not care nor do they understand. There are many things at play, as you said, and I will be the first to say that I do not know all of them, but you raise a good point. I am still not sure if anything running on 1900Mhz would cause issues in the 2.4Ghz band, but I have seen much stranger things happen.
Related
You're probably not going to like this thread.
SAR levels... phone radiation, that kind of thing.
This isn't something I worry about that much but I've noticed some things since upgrading my phone over the years. Also, I've been in some areas with lots of radio waves and then in areas where there are very few radio waves and I have to say
If you think you don't believe in radio as pollution try standing in the middle of the rainforest where there is no power, no phone signal and you'll feel a sense of peace than cannot be compared to in an isolation tank in a city.
When you do this contrast a number of times I come back to the city and there's this sense of buzzing. Bear in mind this is from the ocean to a high rise apartment. I'm 100% sure I'm not imagining it, though I always accept the placebo effect where I could be imagining it, I've seen it so many times now and so clearly I'm adamant the human body's electrical nervous system can be effected by a lot/strong magnetic fields.
Basically I've noticed in years gone by that newer phones seem to feel like they're emitting more power than they did before when idle, but emitting less power when in use.
The reason I think this is because it used to take 20mins on the phone before getting a headache with a Phillips Savvy but that now takes now that takes 35-1hr on a Android gen of device.
However, if I use a modern phone and it's right in the centre of my chest I swear I can feel it. I wonder if there's been any double-blind tests on this. The thing is, I have WiFi on browsing like this and also 3G is at 2 bars but this feeling continues a little in 3G and a very tiny amount in airplane mode. This makes me think there's a magnet in there even during airplane mode. So, is the magnetometer always engaged like it seems to feel? Can we turn that off when not in use to save battery or is that proximity sensor always on?
As I say, I only don't like using the phone with it near my heart, I don't sense any problem anywhere else. Then again, more electrical signals come from the heart to the brain then the other way round so it could be a sensitive area.
Regards bluetooth. I checked out bluetooth headsets because they say the sweep spectrum should reduce area heating and so a SAR rating wouldn't even be possible. But that wasn't what it felt like. I still get headaches with bluetooth headsets, it's just greatly reduced. I figured it's pointless if it's not really working.
After a lot of research I found tube headphones and I use these just for longer calls.
The next thing I'm thinking is to optimise how the phone uses radio and sensors. This should be automated. I'd like to know how to turn off wifi when a connection drops rather than doing it by location in tasker for example. The same sort of thing should be done with GSM & 3G switching so what isn't needed is turned off. All of this meshes nicely with battery life - the 2 are synonymous. Why not enable call forwarding, carry a 2nd phone for GSM and only go out of offline mode for when you need to do something?
However, if my intuition is correct (this is one of the reasons I'm posting this thread), then SAR is just one of 3 radio signals coming out of the phone excluding electricity itself (EMF source).
So,
- so you get headaches during long phone call in the vicinity of the phone?
- do you find it easier to think clearly when on a wired connection compared to WiFi?
- have you thought about this much?
WiFi has been found to effect sperm mobility for definite but other than than it's all pretty unproven. WiFi seems to be lower power but somehow worse than GSM. Not sure about 3G.
However, phones are getting more and more powerful. 3G uses more battery than GSM and WiFi is an additional signal. Then we got 4G WiMax and all the rest on the way. Plus as I mentioned the seemingly minor development of the magnetometer. Is there any limit?
I never used to care that much until I experienced an electrically quiet place and then had to return to the drudgery of the city.
I still feel it's a subtle thing, but the effect for me can actually be very clear now, something that wasn't so for me in the days of GSM only, back then I didn't believe in all this at all.
Another thing I find is that typing on a computer without WiFi is somehow easier to think in a linear way without getting thoughts interrupted. I know, I know, this is a bit much now.
There is less energy coming off of your cell phone's radio transmitter than there is coming off of your computer screen that you interpret as visible light.. but the difference is that light bounces off mostly and if it doesn't it's burning your skin.
So, there's a load of info for you. Also some fixes too. Hopefully these things aren't a problem for you but also I hope to find people to discuss it with.
One thing I never understood was when training in the Air Corp we were taught to keep distance from UHF radios 25 years ago but then in the 90's and 00's phone radiation was not taken seriously at all and we still get people joking about it like it's taboo.
All this is very inconvenient for a tech addict. Obviously I've gone out on a limb with this thread. Be kind
Previous threads for reference:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=826585
Some comments on previous discussions:
"Radio waves are not ionizing, and thus do not carry enough energy to pose any danger whatsoever"
^ I agree there is no immediate effect, but I disagree that a electromagnetic field from a mobile phone does not interfere with an electromagnetic field from the human nervous system
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=484313
^ background data. Good to disable to save battery... but does push email need that? If so then personally I might switch to a poll every 30mins and turning off and on data.
Man you really believe that electrically quiet stuff huh?
--sent from my glacier.
110%!
I bet you've never been somewhere without electricity and a phone signal? Try it
tl;dr
cliff note anyone?
boborone said:
tl;dr
cliff note anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TL; DR VERSION
He says (not bashing) pretty much that the worlds full of waves from electronics, compares them, provides remedys. Talks about waveless places example the jungle, and says there's a slight feel he gets around said waves
--sent from my glacier.
Well, if you're "scared" of high SAR values, i would recommend you to get the Note. It's extremely low at 0.16 W/kg, and it looks like it's the lowest of all cell phones today. I personally don't care about SAR, but i can't complain if it scores well.
- Galaxy Note = 0.16 W/kg
- Samsung Galaxy S = 0.24 W/kg
- Samsung Galaxy S II = 0.33 W/kg
- Samsung Nexus S = 0.50 W/kg
- iPhone 3GS = 0.79 W/kg
- iPhone = 0.97 W/kg
- ZTE Blade - 1,35 W/kg
- iPhone 3G = 1.38 W/kg
- Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro = 1,61 W/kg (!)
LordManhattan said:
Well, if you're "scared" of high SAR values, i would recommend you to get the Note. It's extremely low at 0.16 W/kg, and it looks like it's the lowest of all cell phones today. I personally don't care about SAR, but i can't complain if it scores well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah but one of the points I'm making is that the SAR is only for some of the function on the phone. I think it only covers 2G or 3G during a call. Afaik it's not covering WiFi, WiMax, sensors and also EMF which shielding is there to shield against you see. I guess what's needed is more info on SAR because while I know it's basic I wonder how basic it is. Holding a EMF meter next to a phone would be interesting too. In fact I have another android now so when I got this i9000 fixed I'll hold
Another point I am making is that according to the SAR values my i9000 should be better than my old Phillips Savvy but what I'm saying is that this is not what it feels like.
My guess for why this might be could be because a SAR rating only measures local tissue heating as if the amount of radiation is the only factor. What I'm saying is that it's not simply the peak power output that's important but also what is being transmitted.
I believe WiFi is lower power but it's closer to the frequency at which the human nervous system works.
Thanks for those SAR values, that's interesting. I don't think I'd be able to tell the difference between those values and to be honest I'm not that bothered. It's more of an interesting thing to talk about for me. The iphone looks interesting though, it would be nice to actually use one and see if it actually makes a difference in everyday use.
One thing to clarify is that while I'm totally sure that I can feel radiowaves I'm not too sure that it makes much of a difference to health, especially seeing as flying is a massive dose of radiation and so on.
More more thing to add, the signal effect drops off almost exponentially so if you hold it just 1cm from your ear you've made a reduction. I also prefer to keep it away from the centreline of the body, away from the spine.
That said, I wonder if SAR ratings are a cynical way to sell more phones, no?
Take a look at this site
jago25_98 said:
110%!
I bet you've never been somewhere without electricity and a phone signal? Try it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wales? East Anglia?
Arabian desert? Never noticed any difference.
Mobile operators in the UK have run their own tests where they've told people that a mast is active (and received assurances that those people can feel the EMF resulting in headaches/palpitations) when the masts have actually been off.
In the 70s and 80s it was electricity pylons being blamed for cancer, now people have grown up not thinking twice about them hypochondriacs have latched onto mobile masts, wifi (remember those "leave a chicken breast on your router and it'll cook" stories?), and now they're starting to blame wind farms.
Honestly, your perception is likely heavily weighted by the fact that in cities, etc you know all those devices are surrounding you. Most of what you are feeling is psychosomatic all things considered. Whatever the case, the only way to know will be long-term, properly-executed studies where perception biases can be overridden.
I live in the woods.
Nice and peaceful.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
A house in the woods, mmm, get your coat, you've pulled. How would you like your eggs in the morning? Hard boiled or fertilised?
jago25_98 said:
A house in the woods, mmm, get your coat, you've pulled. How would you like your eggs in the morning? Hard boiled or fertilised?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you Annie Wilkes?
LordManhattan said:
Are you Annie Wilkes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't be silly, she hasn't got a do-do.
She's standing behind me whispering directions to KRAZYADROIDMASTER with her micro sock puppet in my ear
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Rate this thread to express how you think the HTC 10's Wifi performs. A higher rating indicates that it has excellent range, throughput, and signal strength. Like when you're taking a dump in the bedroom upstairs, do your videos have to buffer or do they come through without interruption?
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I am getting drop-outs on my WiFi connection even when feet from the router. The strength is OK but it drops connections, and when making WiFi-based calls the phone complains that WiFi signal strength is low (even when max bars! Clearly this needs and fix from HTC as others are reporting this too.
when I use the normal wifi from my router I seem to have issues but I'm on very old firmware still from Verizon 1.19. I hear the update helps out with wifi issues. When I connect my to my router using the 5G connection it works flawlessly.
I find the wifi strength is not top notch. Very easily it drops its speed. Using ICE Rom.
Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
I found this fault on previous HTC phones that I've dealt with like the M8 M9 all had weak Wi-Fi connection and range.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
I vote excellent. I walked away from our apartment the other day and my 10 clinged on to it's dear life and maintained 1/5 bars where my M7 and missus's G3 just went: nope.
I'll have the "ultimate test" for my 10 next Wednesday. Going to school and in our "lab" we have a WiFi router. This lab is basically a bunker, a bomb shelter.
My M7 could pick up the WiFi from there (with the door closed) fine in a couple of locations around and near the bunker. It's going to be interesting to see how well my 10 can pick it up.
Wi-Fi singal to me is a great, but the speed and connection seems quite off. At times I can use my laptop while my HTC 10 is connected to the same Wi-Fi connection and my laptop speed will be great, but the HTC 10 seems quite sluggish. Additionally, sometimes I will get an error notification with Wi-Fi calling, and sometimes I'll get dropped calls when I have great Wi-Fi signal.
WiFi signal is absolutely horrible for me. Most of the time I only get 1-2 Bars except im really close to the Router.
My Tablet and other phone always get way better Signal strength.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Wifi on HTC 10 is the most horrible implementation I have seen on any device. If you think your wifi is great, go contribute your debug logs to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-10/help/wifi-constant-suspend-resume-leading-to-t3392562
Vote on that thread only after doing the diagnostics, not by "oh, my wifi is great because I can browse on my phone".
I had issues before update 1.80.401.1: connections never seemed stable
Now on the update I've nothing to complain about, throughput is good, ping is stable and the wifi never seems to drop again.
Roaming between access points is also great, no drops there as well.
The range is fine as well. From the house to the garage (about 30m away) I still get a good enough signal to use internet, watch youtube etc.
That's through 2 brick walls and a garden with trees
Wifi range on this phone (HTC 10) is atrocious. The phone is basically useless to me. At home, it refused to connect to my 5ghz band and would only connect to the 2.4ghz band, unless I was within 5ft of the router.
We are currently in Costa Rica on our honeymoon, and while my HTC 10 remains in the hotel room safe 99% of the time while we surf, explore etc., the few times I've needed it it absolutely refused to connect to any of the 3 wifi networks here. Meanwhile, my wife's Galaxy S4 connects to any of them with no issues and gets 20mbps download speeds. My Macbook Pro has no issues and two other people we've talked to have had no issues with their iPhone and LG G4.
I wanted to love this phone but it's given me nothing but issues when it comes to network connectivity. I made the last second decision to leave my Nexus 6P and bring the HTC 10 in an effort to have a smaller phone with me during this trip, but I completely regret it. As soon as we get home the sim card will be pulled and the phone will be shoved into a drawer until another worthy phone comes along to use my next JUMP! Ondemand upgrade on.
It's too bad HTC is making the next Nexus phone. Because I sure as hell won't be buying it after this B.S. experience.
Also, for reference, when I got the phone from T-Mobile I unlocked it and flashed the U.S. unlocked RUU firmware/ROM for faster updates. I had these issues on the 1.53.617.5 RUU and they persist after the latest 1.80.617.1 update.
@sn0warmy do you have the uh oh warranty with 1 day replacement? Because I wonder if this is a hardware issue as some people report good WiFi.
Haldi4803 said:
@sn0warmy do you have the uh oh warranty with 1 day replacement? Because I wonder if this is a hardware issue as some people report good WiFi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not entirely sure. I do pay for the accidental coverage through T-Mobile and I'm sure I could use that to get a replacement through them (they've always been great in giving me replacements when requested). But I've seen so many people with the same issues, who report the replacement doesn't solve the problem., that I almost just don't even want to bother.
sn0warmy said:
I'm not entirely sure. I do pay for the accidental coverage through T-Mobile and I'm sure I could use that to get a replacement through them (they've always been great in giving me replacements when requested). But I've seen so many people with the same issues, who report the replacement doesn't solve the problem., that I almost just don't even want to bother.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the same problem and a replacement for a new phone did the trick....
In my experience, it is mediocre at best.
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Rate this thread to express how you think the HTC 10's Wifi performs. A higher rating indicates that it has excellent range, throughput, and signal strength. Like when you're taking a dump in the bedroom upstairs, do your videos have to buffer or do they come through without interruption?
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My HTC 10's wifi reception and speed is noticeably worst than my LG G3, and MUCH-MUCH worst than my 6 years old Dell Vostro 3350 laptop. At first I thought that my specific unit is defected, and went back to the store to replace it. The store's manager claimed that "it is what it is", and allowed me to examine and compare it thoroughly to his Smsung S7. They performed similarly. Some consolation...
Haldi4803 said:
WiFi signal is absolutely horrible for me. Most of the time I only get 1-2 Bars except im really close to the Router.
My Tablet and other phone always get way better Signal strength.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree man, my old M8 was WAY much better compare to my HTC 10 unfortunately.
I use to get almost full signal in my house at the second floor with the M8, with the HTC 10 cannot even browse.
I have to say this is the only thing that I don't like of this phone, hope a new firmware will do something.
Yeah, I'm on the latest OTA, 1.80 and Wi-Fi is better, but not as good as my old LG g3. Just enabled 2.4Ghz only, and it feels better
Sent from my HTC 10 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Agreed, reception is terrible, I bought the unlocked t mobile version through htc, am on the latest update 1.80.617. I am currently sitting in a hotel room with crappy wifi service, but next door there is a walmart with a strong signal and I am connected through that on my laptop with 4 bars, but I can't get the 10 to connect at all.
Oh look, there is still one bar left.... no reason to switch then....
GTFO WiFi... GTFO
This is well know android issue that has nothing to do with htc.. Android has wifi roaming issues, same happens with samsung ore oneplus...
I was feeling there was an issue with my Note 9 compared to my Note 8 and P20p Thus i decided to do a speedtest. the phones were at the same place and nothing was using the bandwidth. Surprise. look at the video, and you will see. (N8 and p20 came with the same results).
I would like to ask some of you who already have it to test it against other phones to see if i'm the only one with this issue. I have the latest firmware on it and didn't test it before the update...but this is really not normal. I also feel it's just "slower" in general than the p20p...
check this link for the video
Upload video on Youtube plz
Yeah, as a network engineer I'm not going to touch random files on a Dropbox. At least link a speedtest.net result or the image.
I have my note 9 coming on Friday so I can put some effort into getting the optimal wireless connection (there's so many variables involved, I'm a wireless network engineer working for a wisp so all in my realm of knowledge) and give it a test.
I'd be very surprised if its a downgrade compared to Huawei, Samsung spend a lot of time on their LTE radios, now running on CAT 18, with MIMO, for a theoretical bandwidth of 1.2 gbit/s. Will know for sure Friday!
---------- Post added at 05:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
Can't find info on the chipset in the S9+, but I can find that they have MU-MIMO and 1024QAM, so it definitely should be quicker if you have a router supporting the above.
https://bgr.com/2018/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s9-specs-galaxy-s9-plus-specs-complete-list/
Zanr Zij said:
Upload video on Youtube plz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MartyDingo said:
Yeah, as a network engineer I'm not going to touch random files on a Dropbox. At least link a speedtest.net result or the image.
I have my note 9 coming on Friday so I can put some effort into getting the optimal wireless connection (there's so many variables involved, I'm a wireless network engineer working for a wisp so all in my realm of knowledge) and give it a test.
I'd be very surprised if its a downgrade compared to Huawei, Samsung spend a lot of time on their LTE radios, now running on CAT 18, with MIMO, for a theoretical bandwidth of 1.2 gbit/s. Will know for sure Friday!
---------- Post added at 05:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
Can't find info on the chipset in the S9+, but I can find that they have MU-MIMO and 1024QAM, so it definitely should be quicker if you have a router supporting the above.
https://bgr.com/2018/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s9-specs-galaxy-s9-plus-specs-complete-list/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go guys. will update the original post also
https://youtu.be/xEOVgHz7dhg
PS : for information i'm on Ubiquiti hardware here.
Strangely i was able to when i cleared cache....
Aha, well, I'm UBWA certified actually
We're bound to see some minor oddities like such before launch, nice to know its not the phone!
not that shocking to be honest shocking would be getting like 2mg dl not still nearly 50 lol
MartyDingo said:
Aha, well, I'm UBWA certified actually
We're bound to see some minor oddities like such before launch, nice to know its not the phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would interested in your thoughts, post on Friday or weekend in UK thread
vadimo said:
i would interested in your thoughts, post on Friday or weekend in UK thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shall do!
I'll be doing it for my own amusement so definitely happy to share!
Since the test was on WiFi, and not LTE the work Samsung has done on the modem is irelivant.
My question is, are they really on the same network? The results make me think that your Note may be hitting the 2ghz network not the 5ghz network.
boufa said:
Since the test was on WiFi, and not LTE the work Samsung has done on the modem is irelivant.
My question is, are they really on the same network? The results make me think that your Note may be hitting the 2ghz network not the 5ghz network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the thead mate, it was a cache issue. I was only pointing out Samsungs dedication to connectivity, and I did follow up with somewhat comparable specs for the radio.
It could be a number of things, potentially more sensitive radio in the note 9 that struggles to handle interference, etc, it'd be pretty obvious to be on the wrong network.
MartyDingo said:
Read the thead mate, it was a cache issue. I was only pointing out Samsungs dedication to connectivity, and I did follow up with somewhat comparable specs for the radio.
It could be a number of things, potentially more sensitive radio in the note 9 that struggles to handle interference, etc, it'd be pretty obvious to be on the wrong network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps Mate, you need to clarify... first you wrote "shocking!" in the header of the thread, then in one post you said "Strangely i was able to when i cleared cache...." which didn't mean anything to me, and certainly not that you discovered the problem.
And no... being on a 2ghz network vs 5ghz network can be an invisible decision made by the hardware, and many networks are using the same network name. So it wouldn't necessarily be obvious.
For example, in my house, the network ID is "MyHouse" for both the 5ghz and the 2 ghz networks... the Chromecast is on the 2ghz network, and my phone is hitting the 5 ghz network. They see each other and is seamless.
Dude, I don't know one router that has the same SSID by default for both networks. Someone changing the network should notice the difference then.
BTW, I'm not OP, just someone helping.
vadimo said:
i would interested in your thoughts, post on Friday or weekend in UK thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely not an issue!
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4187326458
Though i would add my results here also, Verizon snapdragon model. Definitely seems like something is going on with your test. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4188275993
so you guys testing your wifi speed using your isp network is telling us what exactly?
at best you should test locally but even there. if your network equipment is not on pare then again your testing with too many faulty variables and it won't show phones true potential.
ignorant people would state that a phones wifi has issues because upload speeds sucks compared to DL or just both seem slow.
but in fact what sucks is ISP internet package and not the phone. obviously other parameters like specific servers the test is being done on can co tribute to faulty 'online' test results.
so we have a few factors which make tests like these irrelevant:
-****ty internet package subscription
-****ty test server
-****ty home network
for cell data tests, well we need good weather and be near a cell tower.
but again this proves less concerning phone's capabilites as throughput but more towards signal quality.
and the average will be provider's coverage. how many towers they utilise and your signal strength in general in most common locations you visit.
*btw OP dude, do everyone a favor and correct your thread title...
i was tested on 4 devices, Note 8, XZ2, Iphone X and Note 9, so seem XZ2 always faster and winner
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
bober10113 said:
so you guys testing your wifi speed using your isp network is telling us what exactly?
at best you should test locally but even there. if your network equipment is not on pare then again your testing with too many faulty variables and it won't show phones true potential.
ignorant people would state that a phones wifi has issues because upload speeds sucks compared to DL or just both seem slow.
but in fact what sucks is ISP internet package and not the phone. obviously other parameters like specific servers the test is being done on can co tribute to faulty 'online' test results.
so we have a few factors which make tests like these irrelevant:
-****ty internet package subscription
-****ty test server
-****ty home network
for cell data tests, well we need good weather and be near a cell tower.
but again this proves less concerning phone's capabilites as throughput but more towards signal quality.
and the average will be provider's coverage. how many towers they utilise and your signal strength in general in most common locations you visit.
*btw OP dude, do everyone a favor and correct your thread title...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry dude, but there's so many more factors to be able to throw any of this out. I really hope no one is taking this that seriously.
For one, I have no idea about the noise floor (background EMF noise level) on whichever frequency people have decided to run your AP. (Be it 2.4 or 5ghz, and then which channel, 2.4 ghz only really has three channels, 1,6,11, with the other channels just being overlaps. 5ghz has a lot more but usually everything is on 5180 (channel 36) due to DFS above 5250mhz in mos6 countries. Chances are all of you are suffering from interference.
Then we could talk about MIMO. Each MIMO chain nets you +3db so routers supporting MU-MIMO could see big signal increases just from both devices having multiple MIMO streams going on.
S9+ (and probably the note 9) supports QAM1024, essentially fitting more data over a link at once to the risk of needing a higher signal to noise ratio (this is where noise floors and interference comes heavily into it)
Every situation is unique, I think we should try and explore but please share your enviroment, I.e your router, where you are (apartment, house, city, rural etc) and then we can only start making sense of things.
MartyDingo said:
Sorry dude, but there's so many more factors to be able to throw any of this out. I really hope no one is taking this that seriously.
For one, I have no idea about the noise floor (background EMF noise level) on whichever frequency people have decided to run your AP. (Be it 2.4 or 5ghz, and then which channel, 2.4 ghz only really has three channels, 1,6,11, with the other channels just being overlaps. 5ghz has a lot more but usually everything is on 5180 (channel 36) due to DFS above 5250mhz in mos6 countries. Chances are all of you are suffering from interference.
Then we could talk about MIMO. Each MIMO chain nets you +3db so routers supporting MU-MIMO could see big signal increases just from both devices having multiple MIMO streams going on.
S9+ (and probably the note 9) supports QAM1024, essentially fitting more data over a link at once to the risk of needing a higher signal to noise ratio (this is where noise floors and interference comes heavily into it)
Every situation is unique, I think we should try and explore but please share your enviroment, I.e your router, where you are (apartment, house, city, rural etc) and then we can only start making sense of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but you have to agree that it is folly to report wifi speedtests using home internet and its limitations by the ISP as being a way to gauge a phone's capabilites.
bober10113 said:
but you have to agree that it is folly to report wifi speedtests using home internet and its limitations by the ISP as being a way to gauge a phone's capabilites.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I'm not sure I agree.
If you cable into your router and do a speed test, and use that as your comparison point, I don't see the problem with using a home connection to test.
I don't know what limitations you're talking about, in my experience for speed testing you're routed into the DC where your ISP has its presence then either a speed test server within your ISPs DC network or one right next to it in the same DC.
---------- Post added at 03:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:32 PM ----------
Now if you're using the router supplied by your ISP, whole different story.
I have a 150Mbps internet connection which hits up to 170Mbps . I don't have separate band for WIFI. I ran speed test on my pc connected to the WIFI and it shows 161Mbps and when checking the same on my Galaxy Note 9, it doesn't go more than 90Mbps. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
Note: I have turned off Bluetooth, Location and sim services. Done resetting and clearing cache. Tried the same with no other apps installed.
Just tested without disabling anything (bt on, many apps in background etc).
So Exynos model wifi is much faster than 100Mbps.
Something's really wrong with your phone or wifi network.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
On my router at home, sometimes when I connect, I have to reconnect straight away to get the best speeds. I think it might be something to do with 2.4 vs 5ghz bands.
Your rooter is probably at fault. You need an AC rooter with more than 300 MB (as its 150 dl+150ul) set on 5Ghz with 80Mhz. Look at my stats on a Gigabit connection. I did the test while streaming a 4k hdr tv show on netflix
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
bat0nas said:
Just tested without disabling anything (bt on, many apps in background etc).
So Exynos model wifi is much faster than 100Mbps.
Something's really wrong with your phone or wifi network.View attachment 4594944
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. Can you suggest me a way to fix this issue? I can provide you screenshots of my router config and mobile.
Jonathan-H said:
On my router at home, sometimes when I connect, I have to reconnect straight away to get the best speeds. I think it might be something to do with 2.4 vs 5ghz bands.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. Let me try this.
daniel_cassian said:
Your rooter is probably at fault. You need an AC rooter with more than 300 MB (as its 150 dl+150ul) set on 5Ghz with 80Mhz. Look at my stats on a Gigabit connection. I did the test while streaming a 4k hdr tv show on netflixView attachment 4595243
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. I have tested my router with multiple devices and the speed test always shows above 150Mbps. The issue is with my mobile or the config that my router does when connecting this device. Can you please provide any advice on this?
I'm having slow Wi-Fi performance as well.
I discovered it when I was doing concurrent benchmark app downloads with my LG v30+.
The Note 9 was at least 1/2 as slow (or slower).
Same network & same time so it's not likely a router thing in my case.
This was at work so It's 2.4Ghz.
I'll try testing at home on 5Ghz to see if the issue is the same.
Fastest wifi I've had on a phone yet
NTTDNV said:
I'm having slow Wi-Fi performance as well.
I discovered it when I was doing concurrent benchmark app downloads with my LG v30+.
The Note 9 was at least 1/2 as slow (or slower).
Same network & same time so it's not likely a router thing in my case.
This was at work so It's 2.4Ghz.
I'll try testing at home on 5Ghz to see if the issue is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply mate. Waiting for your test result.
I think i would help if you specifi if its a 6GB Ram or 8GB Ram version.
razzrmaxx said:
I think i would help if you specifi if its a 6GB Ram or 8GB Ram version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is 6GB, exynos 9810, the base variant in India.
NTTDNV said:
I'm having slow Wi-Fi performance as well.
I discovered it when I was doing concurrent benchmark app downloads with my LG v30+.
The Note 9 was at least 1/2 as slow (or slower).
Same network & same time so it's not likely a router thing in my case.
This was at work so It's 2.4Ghz.
I'll try testing at home on 5Ghz to see if the issue is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any luck on fixing the issue?
razzrmaxx said:
I think i would help if you specifi if its a 6GB Ram or 8GB Ram version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that.
Note 9
256GB
6GB RAM
US Model (Snapdragon)
rajaseemanps said:
Any luck on fixing the issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With this morning's tests the phone seems to be performing better.
I downloaded two different apps, and at first it started out slower but both times it caught up and ended up downloading faster than the control phone.
I'll keep checking and report back if the issue returns.
It's baaaaaaaak!
I thought it was better.
But started noticing I had messages sitting unsent, and just general download slowness.
Did another side-by-side comparison with the LG V30+.
Two of these tests were done simultaneously, two sequentially.
All are looking pretty bad for the Note.
Did a "reset settings" and a "reset network settings", didn't improve anything.
Just did a restart and it fared no better.
I may have to resort to a factory reset, don't want to as phone is finally all set up.
NTTDNV said:
It's baaaaaaaak!
I thought it was better.
But started noticing I had messages sitting unsent, and just general download slowness.
Did another side-by-side comparison with the LG V30+.
Two of these tests were done simultaneously, two sequentially.
All are looking pretty bad for the Note.
Did a "reset settings" and a "reset network settings", didn't improve anything.
Just did a restart and it fared no better.
I may have to resort to a factory reset, don't want to as phone is finally all set up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This really sucks man. I feel robbed now. Started hating Note 9. :crying:
rajaseemanps said:
This really sucks man. I feel robbed now. Started hating Note 9. :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm hoping it's fixable.
I gave Samsung a second chance (I had the Note 7).
I'm really liking the phone, but I really like my LG V20 and V30 and the V40 is about to drop.
I'm within the return window at Sprint, gonna have to decide soon.
---------- Post added at 01:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 PM ----------
Update,
My work's router seems to be the issue after all.
I'm not able to reset it during the business day, but I did plug in a second router into it and the speed improved greatly.
It seems to now be on par with my other phone now.
I will keep testing.
Second update:The 5Ghz is smoking fast, 66Mbps up/down. This is on the secondary router.
I'm not sure why our router hates my phone but it does.
Connect to it; little to no Wi-Fi throughput.
Connect to the router plugged into it; normal Wi-Fi throughput.
Since I had two comparable devices connected to the same network, It never would have occurred to me it could be the router.
Another good step to do that I forgot about, after resetting settings power off and boot into bootloader and clear the cache.
Verizon Note 9
My Note 9 is slower than other devices on my WiFi network. I have Galaxy S8 Plus and Fios 75/75 service , when I run speed test my S8 shows about 80/80 but Note 9 never goes more than 65/55 . The same results with my second Note 9 , so it definitely problem with their phones. Shame on you Samsung!
my wifi is broke, I'm not getting 1Gbps:
On my OnePlus 7 I can force creating a 5GHz Hotspot (internet share). How can I force my Pixel 4 XL to do the same?
rasmusj said:
On my OnePlus 7 I can force creating a 5GHz Hotspot (internet share). How can I force my Pixel 4 XL to do the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you're in your hotspot settings, press advanced and set the AP band to 5GHz preferred.
scandalousk said:
When you're in your hotspot settings, press advanced and set the AP band to 5GHz preferred.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it's preferred, but it never works :'(
All 5Ghz devices can support 2.4Ghz networks and 2.4Ghz can reach speeds of 450 Mbps or 600 Mbps. On 4G data connection, you cannot even reach those speeds so 5Ghz seems pointless for a hotspot. Is there a specific reason it has to be 5Ghz?
lywyn said:
All 5Ghz devices can support 2.4Ghz networks and 2.4Ghz can reach speeds of 450 Mbps or 600 Mbps. On 4G data connection, you cannot even reach those speeds so 5Ghz seems pointless for a hotspot. Is there a specific reason it has to be 5Ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will do gaming over hotspot 5ghz
rasmusj said:
I will do gaming over hotspot 5ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you don't need 5Ghz to game? As I mentioned " 2.4Ghz can reach speeds of 450 Mbps or 600 Mbps", so unless you have a mobile data connection faster than that there is not need for 5Ghz. A 2.4Ghz could easily serve the fastest speed 4G can reach.
But 5 is a higher number than 2.4, so it must be better......
Well, Geforce Now runs better on 5ghz, maybe it's just placebo ?* ? but it actually does ?
If you were super serious about gaming you wouldn't use wifi .
lywyn said:
But you don't need 5Ghz to game? As I mentioned " 2.4Ghz can reach speeds of 450 Mbps or 600 Mbps", so unless you have a mobile data connection faster than that there is not need for 5Ghz. A 2.4Ghz could easily serve the fastest speed 4G can reach.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know bandwidth isn't the only parameter that comes into play (especially when talking about gaming) right?
sic0048 said:
But 5 is a higher number than 2.4, so it must be better......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, latency and packet loss are a hoax, screw these new useless technologies /s
zetsumeikuro said:
If you were super serious about gaming you wouldn't use wifi .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we all had latest gen fiber at our homes the world would be a better place, sadly it isn't possible, no matter how serious you are.
hi i have the same problem with my pixel 3a!
My solution is a mini router for 20€, connect the mobile internet via USB to the router and then connect your devices via 5ghz WLAN.
There is a big difference between 2,4 and 5ghz !!
In practice 2,4GHz does not reach more than 30mbits and the more interferences come the worse it gets.
Over the direct Hotspot of the pixel only 25mbits are usable, with the extra 5GHz router this goes up to 70mbits, so there is a clear difference!
I play over Lte and it works absolutely perfect, I sold my gaming PC last month for 2400€, so I am very happy with cloud gaming.
Here are some advantages of cloud gaming, low power consumption, no unnecessary heat development, no fan noise, mobile use, no annoying installation or updates.
To use it properly you need about 50 mbits, nowadays you can get that almost everywhere, soon also in Africa thanks to Starlink.
I also noticed that cloud gaming, whether stadia (which usually doesn't work anyway) or GeForce Now works particularly smooth on my Chrombook. In fact, even my friends discovered this!
kylothow said:
You know bandwidth isn't the only parameter that comes into play (especially when talking about gaming) right?
Yeah, latency and packet loss are a hoax, screw these new useless technologies /s
If we all had latest gen fiber at our homes the world would be a better place, sadly it isn't possible, no matter how serious you are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sic0048 said:
But 5 is a higher number than 2.4, so it must be better......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is like saying "5g is higher than 4g then it must be better right?" sarcastically
please google before spamming your keyboard with ****
historys said:
this is like saying "5g is higher than 4g then it must be better right?" sarcastically
please google before spamming your keyboard with ****
Click to expand...
Click to collapse