4.4 ROMs - Galaxy S III Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app

omarblu said:
Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if its comparision sorry buddy cant help [forum rules] why cant u check out videos in youtube about carbon rom and cm

Yeah I've googled it. They "sound" very different but in practice they feel the same.
I'm only asking for the main differences between them.
Back in the days of 4.1 ROMs dmod etc all the ROMs were very different. Now they don't seem that way.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app

I think that they are very different in the settings but their interface is the same cause they are all basedon the aosp project. If you want to see the differences search videos read the Rom posts or just download them and try them both....
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk

omarblu said:
Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can't compare them but i can tell you both are different from system as other roms are different from scripts, smoothness etc, etc. This is the same case if you want to know wich rom is better we can't help you with that but we can recommend you one

omarblu said:
Yeah I've googled it. They "sound" very different but in practice they feel the same.
I'm only asking for the main differences between them.
Back in the days of 4.1 ROMs dmod etc all the ROMs were very different. Now they don't seem that way.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you say back in 4.1 days you know these roms existed in those days its only last year ok ,dmod is by mr dariolob its just only mod name
but cm carbon aokp pac my favorite miui these are large communities for different devices officially they does not support our phone
but thanks to maclaw and thehacka1 we got them unofficially
but dmod is a classic rom for touchwiz lovers

Related

AOSP based roms for the Touchpad

Guys,
I tried the AOKP Schizoid rom, which has too many controls within and a odd setup for screen based buttons, and then i tried the unofficial CM10 preview which has issues of its own. I am still running the ICS rom that came out, with no camera working.
What is the best rom to flash via CWM.
Thanks !
If you want an AOSP based ROM you can grab the slim ROM from my CM10AOKP thread.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
There is a camera fix you can flash for CM9. Its in the development forum.
What I will never understand is how CM ROMs always come out with broken cameras, yet someone else always manages to make a camera fix. Its almost like the folks at CM hate cameras, and maybe even break them on purpose.
sent from a secret underground bunker
mjben said:
Its almost like the folks at CM hate cameras, and maybe even break them on purpose.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was having a bad day till now, thanks
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
-SGA- said:
If you want an AOSP based ROM you can grab the slim ROM from my CM10AOKP thread.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks ! I did load it up, but the AOSP keyboard kept on crashing, along with no buttons for settings.....is that normal for your ROM ?
LMK ! Thanks !
slim rom is experimental and a work in progress at the moment.

Need more custom roms :)

WHY NO ONE DOES NOT WORK ON MIUI ROM, DEVILS ROM, Semaphore ROM,JETMOD6 ROM.... i9070 Galaxy S ADVANCE is the perfect phone, other phones have had for 12 roms, and more ... we want more quality roms THANKS :highfive:
drakes992 said:
WHY NO ONE DOES NOT WORK ON MIUI ROM, DEVILS ROM, Semaphore ROM,JETMOD6 ROM.... i9070 Galaxy S ADVANCE is the perfect phone, other phones have had for 12 roms, and more ... we want more quality roms THANKS :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my opinion every phone should have :
>cyanogenmod(latest version)
>Paranoid Android(latest version)
>PAC-man rom
>MIUI(dont care)
>AOKP
now for any of these roms there needs to be a solid base of the most important custom rom (well the mother of all custom roms)Cyanogenmod and the devs here(diego-ch,shaaan,frapeti to name a few) are working pretty hard to achieve that so only thing i can say wait for it....
PS sorry to spoil this rant of yours.:angel:
drakes992 said:
WHY NO ONE DOES NOT WORK ON MIUI ROM, DEVILS ROM, Semaphore ROM,JETMOD6 ROM.... i9070 Galaxy S ADVANCE is the perfect phone, other phones have had for 12 roms, and more ... we want more quality roms THANKS :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would love to see MIUI on i9070. It's a very neat ROM.
you're right ... diego-ch, Varun chitre, Shaan, Achyut worked hard ... but we do NOT NEED KERNELS...but we NEED STABLE great ROMS like CYANOGENMOD....MIUI....DEVILS....SEMAPHORE....AOKP ....SLIM ROMS its total GREAT ROMS ...AND THEN kernels
AW: Need more custom roms
Then start to develop!
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
carepack said:
Then start do develop!
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1!!!
All of you that demand all that things should heat up their chairs and make all that!!!
If your answer is "We do not know how..." Then wait and appriciate work of devs so far. :angel:
R: Need more custom roms
carepack said:
Then start to develop!
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2!! You guys want things done but you don't try to do anything to help... If you want something done you can try it yourself! Put some effort into it, it'll be both entertaining and instructive!
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Chry_Gigio said:
+2!! You guys want things done but you don't try to do anything to help... If you want something done you can try it yourself! Put some effort into it, it'll be both entertaining and instructive!
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And developers that do not have our phone need testers. There should be some thread with announcments what dev need a tester, and users to apply.
You need to learn couple things and setup some stuff and you are good to go.
The reason we don't have Many ROMs is because we don't have much developers!!! But yeah it would be cool if we had the opportunity to change our ROMs everyday...
Anyways I'm working on a custom ROM right now... and since this is my first time don't expect anything "awesome" from it...
Sent from my GT-I9070
R: Need more custom roms
I'm working on a nexus styled ROM
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
KINGbabasula said:
I'm working on a nexus styled ROM
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I was also going for that!
Its okay no problem...
PS: if it is ok with you... will you please tell me "how" you are making the ROM... Since this is my first time, I want the "easiest" way to build my first rom
R: Need more custom roms
Sami Kabir said:
Lol I was also going for that!
Its okay no problem...
PS: if it is ok with you... will you please tell me "how" you are making the ROM... Since this is my first time, I want the "easiest" way to build my first rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm modding the systemui and the framework-res. I have the bootanimation ready
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
I believe that soon we will have a fully functional CyanogenMod working on it as the best developers!!! since it is the basis of CyanogenMod and then add other great ROMS Thanks for all developers!!!:highfive:
drakes992 said:
you're right ... diego-ch, Varun chitre, Shaan, Achyut worked hard ... but we do NOT NEED KERNELS...but we NEED STABLE great ROMS like CYANOGENMOD....MIUI....DEVILS....SEMAPHORE....AOKP ....SLIM ROMS its total GREAT ROMS ...AND THEN kernels
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WE NEED THOSE KERNELS.
Without init.d support, we will don't have scripts, custom boot animation, better drivers and powersave support.
I aprecciate the work of the developers, the first thing that we need to make a good ROM is a good kernel. JetMOD 6 now has it, then wait.
When Cyanogenmod for our phone reach his beta/final release you can be sure that all the custom ROMs that you are expecting, will apear
Sorry for bad english, greetings from chile!
Let me get one thing straight! CM is the base. Miui, paranoid, aokp are all based on cm. So once we have a stable cm, only then we can get other roms.
If you cannot wait, donate some money. From this money, we will give a device to the cm team. Only then we will have fast builds and fixes from the cm team itself!
If you don't want to donate, keep shut.!!
I do not respond to tech support via PM
Even screen broken devices are useful for this, there are very expert people in teamhacksung and other cm teams that can do magic even with uart
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
if this phone was released two-three years ago. roms/kernels/mods & themes will be countless the things is, SGSA is a nice phone. fhe price is nice too. BUT devs won't usually get this kind of device nowadays due to sources and lack of support from manufacturer. we are moving faster by the minute. you could wait tho. some devs are just around. some users are studying how to make a nice rom too and share it here. just be patient
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
I'm trying my best too for I9070P though
"Viper kills.....again!"
R: Need more custom roms
gonemad02 said:
if this phone was released two-three years ago. roms/kernels/mods & themes will be countless the things is, SGSA is a nice phone. fhe price is nice too. BUT devs won't usually get this kind of device nowadays due to sources and lack of support from manufacturer. we are moving faster by the minute. you could wait tho. some devs are just around. some users are studying how to make a nice rom too and share it here. just be patient
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm building a nexus styled ROM but without cyanogenmod it's hard to make it very similar
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
KINGbabasula said:
I'm building a nexus styled ROM but without cyanogenmod it's hard to make it very similar
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Say it if I am wrong, but I thought the only difference between aokp(nexus) and cm is the extra features of cm and the boot screen...

Difference between Cm, aokp, aosp, pac Roms?

Hii all,
I am confused between cm, aokp, aosp and pac type rom.
Developers make the rom but they dont explain the advantage/disadvantage of these type of rom.
Can someone explain me what are these, there differences and advantages of each rom?
Thanks Gaurenteed..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
well cm means(cyanogen mod) they are devs share their sources and its good one.
aokp means(android open kang project) and also they are devs share their sources and sure its diffrent from cm.
aosp(android open source project) that type google it self make it and share their sources and its the clear android version without any changes just the original view that nexus devices have.
and pac means (paranoid +aopk + cm) that means this kind of roms have the whole those thing above together in one rom and its pretty awsome
and for me i used cm10.1 by biel and use scripts (this make the rom more smooth and more active ) so i used the script by slaid480 and it called(fly on mod) and everyghing work good for me
thats it
hope you understand
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
nizar.nasani said:
well cm means(cyanogen mod) they are devs share their sources and its good one.
aokp means(android open kang project) and also they are devs share their sources and sure its diffrent from cm.
aosp(android open source project) that type google it self make it and share their sources and its the clear android version without any changes just the original view that nexus devices have.
and pac means (paranoid +aopk + cm) that means this kind of roms have the whole those thing above together in one rom and its pretty awsome
and for me i used cm10.1 by biel and use scripts (this make the rom more smooth and more active ) so i used the script by slaid480 and it called(fly on mod) and everyghing work good for me
thats it
hope you understand
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kangs are usually works by devs who carry on development of a released project (which was left by its original devs)
Sent From my GT-S5830.
Current Rom-The Ultimatum
Kernel-Fire OC Kernel
Audio Manager-BEATS
Hit Thanks you unthankful $*%$&. Its There For A Reason.
Unnamed.Ace.User said:
Kangs are usually works by devs who carry on development of a released project (which was left by its original devs)
Sent From my GT-S5830.
Current Rom-The Ultimatum
Kernel-Fire OC Kernel
Audio Manager-BEATS
Hit Thanks you unthankful $*%$&. Its There For A Reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Advantage?
Disadvantage of one over other?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
devm2024 said:
Advantage?
Disadvantage of one over other?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only used CM(7.2) till now...
But here is what i know/read and can sum up:
•AOSP-Best ones (performance wise). They are most stable since they are official. They are released only after extreme alpha and beta phases... but not as customizable as others.
•AOKP: They are modded versions of AOSP. Customizable. But I have read somewhere that they drain a lot of battery.
•CM: More fast. More Stable. They are the ones that give you unofficial releases of ICS, JB, etc.
•PAC: Its a hybrid. Cant guarantee battery life. But can be awesome if you put it to use in right way.
However, if you are new to flashing, I'd recommend CM 7.2 (further ones are not as stable as 7.2)... Rest can be used after you get hold of things.
But its up to you to decide.
Best Of Luck....
Plz hit thanks if you think this was helpful.
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Unnamed.Ace.User said:
I have only used CM(7.2) till now...
But here is what i know/read and can sum up:
•AOSP-Best ones (performance wise). They are most stable since they are official. They are released only after extreme alpha and beta phases... but not as customizable as others.
•AOKP: They are modded versions of AOSP. Customizable. But I have read somewhere that they drain a lot of battery.
•CM: More fast. More Stable. They are the ones that give you unofficial releases of ICS, JB, etc.
•PAC: Its a hybrid. Cant guarantee battery life. But can be awesome if you put it to use in right way.
However, if you are new to flashing, I'd recommend CM 7.2 (further ones are not as stable as 7.2)... Rest can be used after you get hold of things.
But its up to you to decide.
Best Of Luck....
Plz hit thanks if you think this was helpful.
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone have different experience with roms...i have same battery life with aokp and cm10.1,but i use aokp as its faster and smoother..aosp is smoother than cm and aokp,but its not customizable.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
In simple words,
1) CM offers customisation and control but not as handy as aokp.
2) AOSP roms are the ones that offer no customisation at all unlike cm, aokp etc. They just give you the pure Android experience like your stock rom.
3) Paranoid Android is famously known for bringing tablet like ui on phones with customisation & controls much similar to cm.
4) PAC rom is an integration of all, i.e., aokp, cm and paranoid android.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Venomous Viper 119 said:
In simple words,
1) CM offers customisation and control but not as handy as aokp.
2) AOSP roms are the ones that offer no customisation at all unlike cm, aokp etc. They just give you the pure Android experience like your stock rom.
3) Paranoid Android is famously known for bringing tablet like ui on phones with customisation & controls much similar to cm.
4) PAC rom is an integration of all, i.e., aokp, cm and paranoid android.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was informative
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Unnamed.Ace.User said:
That was informative
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
thienthan6x1 said:
thank you you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont say it just hit it
how to know whic rom i am using whether its aosp,aokp,cm or pac
jesuinodsa said:
how to know whic rom i am using whether its aosp,aokp,cm or pac
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
settings --> about

[Request] PARANOID ANDROID for i9305

Since the official PA dev has quit the support for our devices, many users (including me) would love and appreciate if some other dev with the time, knowledge and willing could take over.
I'm not demanding for anything, I'm just hoping for some kind dev to help us out, since PA is my and many users favorite custom rom.
I also want to thank @gokussjx for his hard work, I totally understand his choice since I'm myself a student, and free time is gold.
Please devs!
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
Bump
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
KillEmAllx said:
Since the official PA dev has quit the support for our devices, many users (including me) would love and appreciate if some other dev with the time, knowledge and willing could take over.
I'm not demanding for anything, I'm just hoping for some kind dev to help us out, since PA is my and many users favorite custom rom.
I also want to thank @gokussjx for his hard work, I totally understand his choice since I'm myself a student, and free time is gold.
Please devs!
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I wish some devs here can take over the work because paranoid android is really one of the best roms.
santos.jeff said:
I agree. I wish some devs here can take over the work because paranoid android is really one of the best roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm really grateful, this is the best rom and the best experience. I will thank if it does not die.
joacaa said:
Yeah, I'm really grateful, this is the best rom and the best experience. I will thank if it does not die.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed this one and Slim are among the winners for me.
Hello,
I've seen that last Paranoid version on xda is based on 4.3 JB : is there any chances to see Kitkat based version of Paranoid on i9305 ?
Thanks.
Manu
I would also like to see PA4 for the i9305, but the development for our devices is very weak, so I don't think there'll ever be...
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
Manu* said:
Hello,
I've seen that last Paranoid version on xda is based on 4.3 JB : is there any chances to see Kitkat based version of Paranoid on i9305 ?
Thanks.
Manu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its the developer you need to contact as he no longer builds for SGS3 .
Anyone out there that wants to take the challenge? There's a lot of AOSP roms for the i9305 out there but no Paranoid Android. Please!
Bump. Please someone haha...
I am trying to build it. But im new at this (only just sucessfully built cm11) and im having trouble with the trees and leaning by myself is kind of hard...
Oh ill get there eventually...
-------------------------------------------------------
Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE GT-I9305
Powered by CyanogenMod 11
Boeffla Kernel 2.1
Tapatalk Pro
-------------------------------------------------------
mzKas said:
I am trying to build it. But im new at this (only just sucessfully built cm11) and im having trouble with the trees and leaning by myself is kind of hard...
Oh ill get there eventually...
-------------------------------------------------------
Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE GT-I9305
Powered by CyanogenMod 11
Boeffla Kernel 2.1
Tapatalk Pro
-------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best answer I've get in months! One thing to take in mind is the camera quality/video recording sound volume. Check OMNI rom thread, the bug got fixed today!
Thank you so much!
Can you help me with my problem maybe? I have problem to get cwm recovery on I9305 (bought from T-Mobile) , each time I try to do it with Odin it loads back stock recovery. Apparently it is because boot-recovery.p
and I don't know how to go around it since this is relatively all new to me.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
Rinako said:
Can you help me with my problem maybe? I have problem to get cwm recovery on I9305 (bought from T-Mobile) , each time I try to do it with Odin it loads back stock recovery. Apparently it is because boot-recovery.p
and I don't know how to go around it since this is relatively all new to me.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure you have I9305?
I would recommend TWRP instead of cwm, IMO it's better.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
Rinako said:
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try looking for threads here in xda that will show you exactly what to do. Do your research, I know there's something that will help you. You could try with TWRP.

[Q] Cm11 or Omni Rom 4.4?

CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
For me there is only CM I`m a big fan since CM 9 ...but i think you should test both and make your own decision what works better for you ...
sorry for this ,but in the end it is subjective where your own preferences are ...
Oliv3go said:
CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This boils down to personal preference. They won't be the same - CM will have features that Omni doesn't, and vice versa.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
To test both ? :good:
Oliv3go said:
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mackay ROM !!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
jorgecft said:
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both are good
i think CM11 is a very good rom. i have Mackay KK 4.1.1 on my Galaxy i9000 and it is very very smooth and stable. I also test Mackay Omni rom alpha and i think it is also an interesting Rom.
freakymod2120 said:
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Sorry i was wrong...you mean the cm updater in CM itself and not the cminstaller for bringing CM to your device with rooting first time and so on ....now it is clear...
Oliv3go said:
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
M0Rf30 said:
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multi Windows!!!!? if that 's right then this will be the best ROM for i9000.
But omnirom is still in alpha mode with many issues pending to be solved.
CM nightly have very little minor bugs which can be ignored. I love it. I am using cyanAOSP 1.4.0 KitKat ROM based on CM11 and it is awesome.
this is my 100th post, and finally a senior member on XDA. yippie!!!!
I'm not sure that multi windows is going to be much use to us on a 4" screen..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I think that we will never see multi windows on i9000 anyway...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Good. It's a stupid idea IMO lol
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
aris_p said:
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is only so much you can do, especially since you're running firmware intended for stronger devices, with dual and quad cores being the norm for ICS/JB nowadays
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk

Categories

Resources