Related
Good Evening to everybody.
I was reading about the Jellaxy Project has been discontinued and i thinked "oh damn... they say there are far better 4.2. roms but I don't like 4.2... i just want the good old Jellaxy's 4.1.2". I think our screen is too little for a lockscreen like that (it is difficult to insert the code), it is more unstable et cetera et cetera...
So... why not? Somebody could continue that project if there are a few people who want they to do it. Nobody else agrees with me?
I apologise because of my very bad english (I'm Italian). I hope you'll understand if I don't know what you mean
P.S. i don't know if this thread is a question so I don't know what to do with that checkbox down there
|
|
|
v
Use lagloose's cm 10 for that.
And also read the thread carefully.,you will get your ans..
KranTi said:
Use lagloose's cm 10 for that.
And also read the thread carefully.,you will get your ans..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry I couldn't find the rom you mentioned... searching "lagloose cm10" "cm10 lagloose cooper"... I only find out about Jellaxy discontinued project...
Apotheosys said:
Sorry I couldn't find the rom you mentioned... searching "lagloose cm10" "cm10 lagloose cooper"... I only find out about Jellaxy discontinued project...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol..
Its same..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
KranTi said:
Lol..
Its same..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So... no cm10.0 for us?
Apotheosys said:
So... no cm10.0 for us?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeap, i guess there will be no more project for 4.1.2 rom in the meantime, until there are devs who want to develop it again..
But maybe its hardly for that to happen (maybe) because devs (like erikcas, bieltv.3 or Old Droid) will focus only on the latest JB rom, that is 4.2.2 rom.
Why dont you give a try the 4.2.2 JB rom on ur ace? Install it, n try it for a while (adaption to a new rom will takes time), you will like it
There is alot of choices, like:
AOKP jb-mr1 by erikcas
Cyanogenmod 10.1 4.2.2 androidarmv6 by Bieltv.3 (Official maintainer after Wayland_Ace work, and Erikcas)
or CM10.1, PAC-rom 22.0.0, PARANOIDANDROID by OldDroid
The 4.2.2 Rom will become the best rom for our ace s5830, have faith to our ace devs.. they will bring us the best JB rom, its just matter of time from them to give us an amazing JB rom :highfive: :victory:
Aces5 said:
yeap, i guess there will be no more project for 4.1.2 rom in the meantime, until there are devs who want to develop it again..
But maybe its hardly for that to happen (maybe) because devs (like erikcas, bieltv.3 or Old Droid) will focus only on the latest JB rom, that is 4.2.2 rom.
Why dont you give a try the 4.2.2 JB rom on ur ace? Install it, n try it for a while (adaption to a new rom will takes time), you will like it
There is alot of choices, like:
AOKP jb-mr1 by erikcas
Cyanogenmod 10.1 4.2.2 androidarmv6 by Bieltv.3 (Official maintainer after Wayland_Ace work, and Erikcas)
or CM10.1, PAC-rom 22.0.0, PARANOIDANDROID by OldDroid
The 4.2.2 Rom will become the best rom for our ace s5830, have faith to our ace devs.. they will bring us the best JB rom, its just matter of time from them to give us an amazing JB rom :highfive: :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, I tried so many roms, but I just like CM... Second, I tried OldDroid's CM10.1 and I hated it; Third, I love the work of these developers, but I think they should focuse on bettere projects like KERNEL 3.0... I just noticed that Samsung Corby has this kernel and we don't... a port would be a very good thing.
Hello to all,
The Maclawstudio have announced that they are working on kernel 3.0 for galaxy Ace / Gio.
All those who are interested to port this kernel by Ace / Gio in galaxy mini, please contact me.
I do not think it will be so difficult
Please contact me(pm) :highfive:
greetings
Ma-90 @
Request
Can u also port his cm10.1.
Venomstar said:
Can u also port his cm10.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but I do not think there is a need for mini already there
reported .....mods may close this thread..
and dude if you want help goto either general or q and a section.....
post here only when you are done with the project..
Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?
OJ said:
Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ofcourse
MaclawStudio just takes psyke83's work and again saying it's his. What a tool - same for everything else - taken from androidarmv6. And people still download his builds. Pathetic. Then keeps everything closed source (even the kernel, lol) so nobody can see that. x) Just haven't got enough words to describe this "developer"
i dont care if its stolen, remaked, rearanged, modified, etc...the truth is gonna come along with punishment (sound like Jehova whitness), as long as this 3 kernel works...
I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)
TheWhisp said:
I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it is not necessary to port kernel since Erikcas already is working on it right?
Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.
TheWhisp said:
Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But if maclawstudio kernel port about Ace / Gio you can use them on our FSR galy mini, right?
Yes
I only leave this here:
bgm92 said:
Just shut up! Maclaw offered us more stable builds than you or other devs ever did! Show a little respect and stop denigrating him because he did a better job than you!
I really hope Maclaw won't release 3.x kernel sources so you won't steal his work and port it to other phones.
__________________________________________________
And one another important thing! How can you tell us he stoke psyke83's work? From where do you know? Have you got any proofs? How can you just speak like that? Again, just shut up - like a romanian proverb says: If you would shut up, you would remained a philosopher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
News flash bro ....Ever tried erikcas's builds please do if you didn't they are the most stable ones available.
also maclaw can/most likely isnt working on a source port for ace/gio but the truth of the matter is that would be sheer waste of time.Psyke83 already did the work,erikcas and wayland ace ported it to gio and ace respectively(they added their defconfigs and nessary parts) so it would be foolish of maclaw to start from scratch.
Also lets clarify he may/most likely is Kanging erikcas , wayland ace and psyke83 's work but since its open to all to build its not actually stealing(provided he gives credit but thats just good manners).
also the fsr module is a proprietary module(source code is not available) the one that psyke83 is using was leaked via a galaxy5 eclair kernel sources and still contained proprietary blobs(possibly that's the problem area).
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen).
PS reported you.(for starting a possible flame war).
PPS also maclaw still breaks the gpl by distributiing a closed source kernel based on opensourced resources(its still linux).
---------- Post added at 07:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------
marcin1147 said:
I only leave this here:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
knock knock ....correction Erikcas and psyke83's not TheWhisp.
Dark Passenger said:
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
COOL STORY BRO
*click*
BTW. Maybe you don't know but our sources are here: https://github.com/MaclawStudio/aosp_kernel
Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini....
many people trusted him and donated..
and when there was enough he betrayed by stopping development and not using the money what it was meant for ...
most people argue that he promised but as always there is no proof or a written agreement or contract and thus the money donated with trust of further development of various development was pocketed...
I am not blaming or accusing anyone of anything but just stating the facts that i know..
hsay said:
Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini.... many people trusted him and donated..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maclaw told me that nobody has donated.
and you believed?
anyway lets stop the discussion right here...
if maclaw comes back for development i dont have any problems...
he is welcome anytime
Please, stop this stupid arguing.
I know a lot of people hates me here, I don't care.
Just relax, let every developer like erikcas, TheWhisp etc. do their bests without fighting.
Maybe our device sources are closed, but we've to share kernel sources. If we do 3.x kernel, we'll have to share sources aswell.
Erickas will make 3.x? Great, every Samsung device with msm7x27 will be able to use it with mention that it's ported by him.
We will make 3.x? Great, as up. We must to share kernel sources when we release it.
What a difference?
Hi guys! Im curious why our monster device dont have too much ported roms though it is possible? is it because there is only few users? I want to learn how to port roms for our device. Im reading a tutorial here in XDA and have a porter friend from my past device. I asked him to port roms for our device like slimbean, carbonrom, Pac etc. Hope this device gets more attention from the rom makers
marshygeek said:
Hi guys! Im curious why our monster device dont have too much ported roms though it is possible? is it because there is only few users? I want to learn how to port roms for our device. Im reading a tutorial here in XDA and have a porter friend from my past device. I asked him to port roms for our device like slimbean, carbonrom, Pac etc. Hope this device gets more attention from the rom makers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will help you as much as i can...will share links which i have read to port MIUI V5 for our device...
And the reason that our device does not has many roms is that it was not released globally like the S3 or S4...
It is actually local only to Korea...and still many have managed to get it...
And its good if we all work together as a team ... we sure will have many roms for our device too....:good:
Shrewdy said:
I will help you as much as i can...will share links which i have read to port MIUI V5 for our device...
And the reason that our device does not has many roms is that it was not released globally like the S3 or S4...
It is actually local only to Korea...and still many have managed to get it...
And its good if we all work together as a team ... we sure will have many roms for our device too....:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good news! I will talk to my friend who ports rom to my ex-device. and also let's ask for other members to participate.
This is the link that im reviewing http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008
We need Base CM10 or CM10.1 depending on what we will port. Do we have "Clean" CM10 or CM10.1 as base?
marshygeek said:
This is the link that im reviewing http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008
We need Base CM10 or CM10.1 depending on what we will port. Do we have "Clean" CM10 or CM10.1 as base?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, even i am referring to the same guide...
Now as far as i know we do have a clean CM10 as base for SHV-E120L & SHV-E120S both...but we dont have a pure clean CM10.1 for either of the devices...
But we do have Mokee OS 4.2.2 for both of the above mentioned devices...and i even tried to take CM10.1 from Cyanogen mods website and take Mokee OS as base to port the latest to CM10.1 and have a running CM10.1 but i never succedded...
And i was also wondering if you know what is the difference between these 2 devices...
Thanks
Thats what i dont know. Im just a new user of this device. If we have clean CM10 then we can port 4.1.2 roms. but not 4.2.2. It's OK there are lot of nice 4.1.2 roms out there Can u give me the link of the clean CM10 for SHV e120L?
Shrewdy said:
Yup, even i am referring to the same guide...
Now as far as i know we do have a clean CM10 as base for SHV-E120L & SHV-E120S both...but we dont have a pure clean CM10.1 for either of the devices...
But we do have Mokee OS 4.2.2 for both of the above mentioned devices...and i even tried to take CM10.1 from Cyanogen mods website and take Mokee OS as base to port the latest to CM10.1 and have a running CM10.1 but i never succedded...
And i was also wondering if you know what is the difference between these 2 devices...
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeas there is Mokee 4.2.2 and ive tried it. Its base on CM10.1. We must first know what did the porter used as a base to port Mokee 4.2.2.
marshygeek said:
Yeas there is Mokee 4.2.2 and ive tried it. Its base on CM10.1. We must first know what did the porter used as a base to port Mokee 4.2.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, check these links
This link contains pure CM10 compiled by Socim:
http://d-h.st/users/Space/?fld_id=0#files
And this link contains a spread sheet which mentions most of the roms that exist for our devices...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AosAjYg4w51XdHkxNlRzWFk4UllTTHFNd1JpLW9TWHc&pli=1#gid=19
Hope this helps...:good:
Ok i will try using Socim's CM10 as base.
Sorry! guys!
Development failed
since i can't get hold of an nexus 6
or any other nexus device with Lollipop
i won't be able to develop it!
CLOSED!
I'd do but
aaronjgeorge said:
Pataki means fart!
Fart means air meaning space between particles! meaning space for more people!!
Anyone want to help me build the pataki rom message me
its a work in progress
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd love to help, but I'm in the middle of building my own custom ROM, Aeroi. Maybe after I'm done with the initial build I'll join your team.:highfive:
Jelixis said:
I'd love to help, but I'm in the middle of building my own custom ROM, Aeroi. Maybe after I'm done with the initial build I'll join your team.:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you will finish your ROM please post it here. I like to try new ROMs
cheers
Soon
JoKeR[RO-VL] said:
When you will finish your ROM please post it here. I like to try new ROMs
cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will soon, it will be CM 11 based with some performance tweaks like SuperCharger, etc. It's my first ROM and I'm still downloading the Android source code so it will take time. First time I make a ROM hopefully I can release it haha
Anything, guys?
Update(29/05/20): We have now Android 10 build for our Realme 1. Check out the thread here: [ROM][CPH1859/61][10][UNOFFICIAL] LineageOS 17.1
Download the latest build and twrp recovery given there and flash!
Update(11/03/20): I have resumed development. The first build is already up. Check it here: LineageOS 16.0 for Realme 1
I will start bug fixing and weekly builds soon.
reserved
Waiting bro
thanks
Sorry bro i cabt help i am not developer but thanks for your efforts
Good
Is anything happening on this front?
When can we get rid of this ColorOS?
akash1988 said:
Is anything happening on this front?
When can we get rid of this ColorOS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have stopped development for now due to less time for it and also I don't own the device. Will think of it after we have Stable Pie and work on LOS 16.0 then. If I get some help then things can be better.
Ask for donations from people if they want roms for this device
cash money42k said:
Ask for donations from people if they want roms for this device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People generally don't think of that and most of the users won't do. Also its Mediatek the development process would be itself hard and also fixing bugs would be troublesome
Invincible-Venom said:
People generally don't think of that and most of the users won't do. Also its Mediatek the development process would be itself hard and also fixing bugs would be troublesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its hard process i agree but not impossible bro, many micromax devices aslo run on mediatek but almost all hv custom roms thn why not our device?? due its new upgraded chipset??
abhi.s4u said:
its hard process i agree but not impossible bro, many micromax devices aslo run on mediatek but almost all hv custom roms thn why not our device?? due its new upgraded chipset??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Firstly, those builds are Ports and not compiled from Source. Also after Android 7.1.2 Nougat and Treble Enbaled devices things have changed and not easy as they used to be. When I worked for Meizu devices I was successful in booting AOSP ROM for 2-3 devices but that not how things work now!
Bro we got stable pie now, team up who have experience developing rom for mediatek devices and please try lineageOS 16
Can't I use this rom for oppo f7 youth? As i know both are one.
I am happy with stock OS and rootless launcher !
I don't feel any other ROM required!
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
huzz45 said:
Bro we got stable pie now, team up who have experience developing rom for mediatek devices and please try lineageOS 16
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't got any people who want to work on this device.
ntkien400 said:
Can't I use this rom for oppo f7 youth? As i know both are one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all the builds are not ready. Also I don't think we can unlock bootloader on Oppo F7 Youth
Invincible-Venom said:
I haven't got any people who want to work on this device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like to volunteer to contribute in the dev process. I haven't ever done anything related to custom ROMs but I'd like to try and invest a few weeks/months into it. Invincible-Venom, it'd help me a lot if we could connect via some IM service (discord? or smth).
arvindpunk said:
I'd like to volunteer to contribute in the dev process. I haven't ever done anything related to custom ROMs but I'd like to try and invest a few weeks/months into it. Invincible-Venom, it'd help me a lot if we could connect via some IM service (discord? or smth).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for showing interest pal but I need some experienced guys to join me. Firstly, you try building ROMs for any other device which you own from scratch(Build trees, make them stable) then you will learn how things work. Also this is Mediatek device with Treble enabled so things are not easy here.
Thanks!!
Invincible-Venom said:
Thanks for showing interest pal but I need some experienced guys to join me. Firstly, you try building ROMs for any other device which you own from scratch(Build trees, make them stable) then you will learn how things work. Also this is Mediatek device with Treble enabled so things are not easy here.
Thanks!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@APHACKER007 and @anuragroy will help you developing rom
So all the hopes are dead for a decent stock custom ROM?