Related
General information on Xposed has been moved to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/xposed-installer-versions-changelog-t2714053
The FAQ has been moved to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/-t2735540
Questions, suggestions, bug reports and so on can be posted in the Xposed General forum (for the installer/framework/development only) and in the Xposed Framework modules forum (for anything module-related).
Sounds interesting.I hope that you make a apk that simplifies things for simple user like rom control in AOKP
Keep up the good work my friend
That's great, decompiling/compiling apks is not really my cup of tea lol thanks rovo89
May be useful for my themes, keep working on it
Very interesting... Will try soon.
This looks like a really great idea and could help reduce the need for dev's being pestered by users for mod's every time a new rom is leaked/released, well done sir, hope to see this take off
I will definitely have a swing at this over the next few days. This looks like fun!
**This message will self-destruct**
Thanks for the "thanks" everyone. I decided to create an installer first before looking into the other things. This way, I hope a few people can test whether it works on their device (see first post for the APK).
Some notes about this:
The installer holds the app_process executable and the XposedBridge.jar as assets and can install it to the correct locations (root permissions required!).
It will automatically create a backup of /system/bin/app_process at /system/bin/app_process.orig, which can be restored either via the app or via shell (e.g. adb, works in recovery as well).
I have only tested it on ICS (LPQ Stock). Honestly, I do not have the time to test it with anything below that. If somebody wants to do this, I can help you to get started with the code. app_process was not changed very often, so chances are rather good that it will work with only few changes.
The installer requires SDK15 (4.0.3) for the same reason.
Improvements for any part of the code are welcome! It should be easy to use for both users and developers.
(Un-)Installing the installer app alone does not change anything (at least not now). Please use the buttons inside the app.
The next step should now really be to load modules dynamically, I hope I can use standard installable APKs for that (although the framework will probably request enabling confirmation for technical and security reasons).
siberian tiger said:
I hope that you make a apk that simplifies things for simple user like rom control in AOKP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I read, Rom Control seems to be something like the Settings app for ROM-specific stuff? I am not so sure yet whether I want to implement generic settings in the framework.
Having a standard interface for setting loading/saving (like or using Android's Shared Preferences) would probably make sense. But the settings themself can be very different from module to module, so I would rather let those bring their own settings menus.
What I did though was to implement an installer. My idea how it should ideally work for end users:
Install the Xposed Installer
Click the "Install/Update" button in the installer
Install one or more modules
Configure the modules (if necessary)
Have fun!
Where "install" would mean that you can download the app from the Play Store or a website and install it with the usual package manager. At least for steps 1 and 2, this is working already. For the others, I have to see.
Dynamic module loading is implemented now as well. Modules are normal apps with a special metadata tag and an asset describing which classes to load. You can look at my modifications for examples how this works. I think it is quite simple to develop and use.
I feel that Xposed is quite stable right now. It should be very easy to install both the framework and the modules without any knowledge about modding.
Also for developers, creating a new module is not too complicated. If anyone wants to give it a try, I'm happy to help you getting started. I'm convinced that Xposed is great alternative to APK modifying, but it will not work without developers creating modules for it.
Speaking of modules, I have published one for the famous CRT off effect: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1583963
The source code is also available at Github. See how it has less than 40 lines (and only about 10 LOC)? I think that this is awesome!
I was not able to install it as normal app hence pushed them to system/app using root explorer.
It works perfectly on XXLPS SENSATION ROM ICS V 3.2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
OK you got me interested
What is currently holding me back is a lack of "documentation" about how to go about doing things...
Is there any reference info (even source code comments) that I should have a read of?
Or perhaps a little worked-through guide as to how you made the screen-off or red-clock one, complete with the "thinking" behind it all, just to learn the thought process.
This seems potentially hugely useful for me, just need to know what it can do!
Diliban said:
I was not able to install it as normal app hence pushed them to system/app using root explorer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Oh. Did you get any error message? I assume you have allowed installation of non-market apps?
@pulser_g2: Feedback taken! Until now, I focused on bringing Xposed to a level where it is actually doing something useful for end-users.
As there are some steps that can not be documented easily in the source code (e.g. how you mark an app as Xposed module), I will recreate a tutorial how you can create the clock example. I will try to give many details not only what to do, but also how you can know that you need to do this.
TUTORIAL - How to create an Xposed module
The tutorial has been moved to https://github.com/rovo89/XposedBridge/wiki/Development-tutorial
this is one of the most amazing projects made lately.
You are unleashed the best way to handle mods and possible some hacks.
very great work, robo89
Great concepts mate. Very powerful.
Wouldnt this also expose a device to malicious coders?
If a device has this implemented then is it possible that a simple theme could contain something nasty.
Not trying to stop progress of this project just throwing this out there for consideration.
----------------------
GTI9100 KK5
aceofclubs said:
Wouldnt this also expose a device to malicious coders?
If a device has this implemented then is it possible that a simple theme could contain something nasty.
Not trying to stop progress of this project just throwing this out there for consideration.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is an absolutely valid thought.
In a way: Yes, it is easier to do something malicious with this. With great power comes great risk. The thing is: How would you prevent that? I couldn't think of any way once a module has been loaded, because a) how do you identify something malicious and b) how can you block it when it could just circumvent the security measure taken?
So what I did was to require that you enable a newly installed module in the installer. This at least avoids that you install any normal app and it contains a hidden Xposed module.
And not trying to play this question down, but you could insert malicous code in a theme also when you post a new framework.jar or SystemUI.apk. You could just change the smali code, compile it and you have similar power. For example, modifiying the constructor of the Activity class would also get you into any app and you could as well do whatever you want. You wouldn't even find these modifications because of the hundreds of classes in the Android framework. In this point, Xposed modules are easier to check, because they will usually contain just one class with very few and short methods.
Or take Superuser. Yes, it is asking you every time whether you want to execute this command. But the command can as well be a script that could replace files as the root user. Same for the kernel. In any case, when you modify anything in your phone, there is a risk that it is malicous.
As I said, I'm not denying that there could be a misuse of this project. But I do not see a chance to prevent it without blocking even simple real-life modifications. If anybody has ideas, please let me know.
rovo89 said:
This is an absolutely valid thought.
In a way: Yes, it is easier to do something malicious with this. With great power comes great risk. The thing is: How would you prevent that? I couldn't think of any way once a module has been loaded, because a) how do you identify something malicious and b) how can you block it when it could just circumvent the security measure taken?
So what I did was to require that you enable a newly installed module in the installer. This at least avoids that you install any normal app and it contains a hidden Xposed module.
And not trying to play this question down, but you could insert malicous code in a theme also when you post a new framework.jar or SystemUI.apk. You could just change the smali code, compile it and you have similar power. For example, modifiying the constructor of the Activity class would also get you into any app and you could as well do whatever you want. You wouldn't even find these modifications because of the hundreds of classes in the Android framework. In this point, Xposed modules are easier to check, because they will usually contain just one class with very few and short methods.
Or take Superuser. Yes, it is asking you every time whether you want to execute this command. But the command can as well be a script that could replace files as the root user. Same for the kernel. In any case, when you modify anything in your phone, there is a risk that it is malicous.
As I said, I'm not denying that there could be a misuse of this project. But I do not see a chance to prevent it without blocking even simple real-life modifications. If anybody has ideas, please let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is so refreshing to see someone take such a mature approach as this.
I greatly appreciate your time on that tutorial, and I will take a proper read through it while working it out myself later... (on vacation right now, this seems like a good thing to try if it rains )
Regarding security, I guess you could add a way to protect WHAT was being edited... Such that your package needed to declare edit access to package X and Y, and if it doesn't have permission, it can't do it... This way, if I want to interfere in Gmail, the user must agree, and he/she will say "well... Why is my no battery sound tweak touching gmail?" But this obviously doesn't help for frameworks and services where they are all in the one file... :/
pulser_g2 said:
Regarding security, I guess you could add a way to protect WHAT was being edited... Such that your package needed to declare edit access to package X and Y, and if it doesn't have permission, it can't do it... This way, if I want to interfere in Gmail, the user must agree, and he/she will say "well... Why is my no battery sound tweak touching gmail?" But this obviously doesn't help for frameworks and services where they are all in the one file... :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe.. I could rather easily implement something in hookMethod that checks the method to be hooked against a whitelist defined in an asset in the module (which could of course contain wildcards). Then when you enable a module, I could display this whitelist, with a warning if it includes some very central classes/packages/methods (but how to create such a list?).
However, this cannot control the following:
What you do inside the handling method. If you change anything in SystemUI (and that might be only the battery icon or the clock color), this method will be executed in the context of the SystemUI, which has a large set of Android standard permissions.
Calling any methods of the framework and modifying any available variables, as this can be done via standard reflection.
Basically anything that is not handled through XposedBridge, but using standard techniques.
Wanted to install the framework, but i am getting:
sh: /data/data/de.robv.android.xposed.installer/cache/install.sh: no such file or directory
What am i doing wrong ?
let me start off by saying that the xposed framework is absolutely awesome but if you've noticed recently just the amount of modules have just gotten a bit unruly I suggest adding some sort of tag system to help organize all the modules
for example some the tags could be device specific modules, type of module, android version etc.
ie. I would disable any tags with sense or touchwiz because I do not on that device and those modules wouldn't work on my device
This is a frequently suggested feature and I think it's valid, but everytime I asked for someone to develop this idea further, replies stopped...
Before thinking about an implementation, it's necessary to find out which kind of categorization makes sense for most modules. There are more than 350 of them now and many of them have different requirements and purposes. Tags make only sense if they are understood and used consistently. Just giving developers the choice to create and assing tags won't work, there need to be clear guidelines, ideally even a predefined set of tags. These guidelines need to be drafted by someone, but I'm too busy to do the major work of it. If some people want to volunteer to analyse the existing modules, look for similarities (and differences) between modules, assign tags to them to get a feeling what's needed and propose guidelines, be my guest. You can use this thread for discussion and coordination.
Just to give you some examples which this isn't trivial:
- Some modules work for basically every ROM and devices.
- Others just work on certain ROMs on certain devices (the device alone is rarely a limiting factor).
- Others will work on a certain type of custom ROM (e.g. CyanogenMod-based) on different devices, but sometimes there might be a version limitation.
- Some modules can work on Sense and TouchWiz - so if you hide all TouchWiz modules, but want to see Sense modules, special filter logic is required.
- Some modules target a certain app.
That's just the works-or-not section, which I suggest to start with. Purposes of modules are even more segmented.
rovo89 said:
This is a frequently suggested feature and I think it's valid, but everytime I asked for someone to develop this idea further, replies stopped...
Before thinking about an implementation, it's necessary to find out which kind of categorization makes sense for most modules. There are more than 350 of them now and many of them have different requirements and purposes. Tags make only sense if they are understood and used consistently. Just giving developers the choice to create and assing tags won't work, there need to be clear guidelines, ideally even a predefined set of tags. These guidelines need to be drafted by someone, but I'm too busy to do the major work of it. If some people want to volunteer to analyse the existing modules, look for similarities (and differences) between modules, assign tags to them to get a feeling what's needed and propose guidelines, be my guest. You can use this thread for discussion and coordination.
Just to give you some examples which this isn't trivial:
- Some modules work for basically every ROM and devices.
- Others just work on certain ROMs on certain devices (the device alone is rarely a limiting factor).
- Others will work on a certain type of custom ROM (e.g. CyanogenMod-based) on different devices, but sometimes there might be a version limitation.
- Some modules can work on Sense and TouchWiz - so if you hide all TouchWiz modules, but want to see Sense modules, special filter logic is required.
- Some modules target a certain app.
That's just the works-or-not section, which I suggest to start with. Purposes of modules are even more segmented.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For the Xposed modules index thread, I'm using 9 categories to separate modules by their function, and additional tags for modules that are specific to an Android version or vendor.
If you find that that makes sense and if you'd like to use it, I can share a CSV file (which is easily usable with Python, which is why I picked it) that should have the necessary info to easily add it to your server's data "automatically" (by writing a hopefully short script) (fields include, among others: tags and package name for each module).
I realize this needs discussion and will take a good amount of time and effort, but I'm just offering the index right now should you want to take a look at it. Also, if you think I/the community can make your life easier by categorizing modules with additional tags, I'm sure many will step up to help.
That is so kind of you! Thats awesome
I will also say that I wasn't very clear. (What it became is way awesome)
I meant only like an automatic way to get ones that won't work with my device to be hidden
My scenario for this was I have an aosp gpe tablet. And when I'm brousing modules I don't want to scroll past 6 experia mods that don't apply to me.
Thank you for all you hard work, I have been a user for many releases prior and love that your software has always been "there and working well". So why only speak up when I have a problem, so for that I apologize.
I have managed to obtain a version of Xposed (Systemless) ported for Magisk installed on my phone (SDK 23) and while Magisk lists Xposed in its installed module list with a check box saying it is active, the Xposed menu shows the green notification area that says it is working, when I install XprivacyLua, and while after the installation of XprivacyLUa, in the Modules section of Xposed there is a check box showing that XprivacyLua is installed and active, the problem is that the Xprivacy app thinks it is not loaded. I sent trace logs captured via adb to the Xprivacy developer and he says that Xposed believes the XprivacyLua app is not installed (even though all indications are that it is active).
Someone who knows more about this than me stated my problem was likely with Toybox being on the phone and something about symlinks where he gave another suggestion about loading Busybox and then following with loading a BusyBox binary zip package via TWRP. All this does is render me not able to access MagiskManager any longer.
Do you know anything about such an issue and how I might get around it? I am saddened that using this valuable tool is being made so difficult from all the new hardware changes. I normally stick with age old phones, but accidents happen, the old one's cracked and my new one won't seem to work with Xposed.
Thanks!
BLU STUDIO XL 2 16/2G
MT6737
ARMv7 Processor rev4 (V71)
armv71
Is there anyone who can help me with my issue? I have poor eyesight and need a larger phone like the BLU, plus as often as I drop phones I cannot afford to buy the fancy, expensive and popular gaming models that everyone seems to purchase.
I am willing to do what ever it takes to resolve the issue, including running traces, submitting file structure maps or anything the developer needs to address the issue with Toybox or whatever the problem that is causing XprivacyLua not to be enabled by Xposed.
Thank you again.
Donphillipe said:
Is there anyone who can help me with my issue? I have poor eyesight and need a larger phone like the BLU, plus as often as I drop phones I cannot afford to buy the fancy, expensive and popular gaming models that everyone seems to purchase.
I am willing to do what ever it takes to resolve the issue, including running traces, submitting file structure maps or anything the developer needs to address the issue with Toybox or whatever the problem that is causing XprivacyLua not to be enabled by Xposed.
Thank you again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about making system run in permissive mode?
have you tried?
I have not "jumped" from superSU to majisk so my method is to use superSU.
I have a recovery install package that sets file in place to make permissive and force superSU to install systemless.
you can give a try.
the updater-script prints out a message it was made for "blu tank xtreme pro" but it is fine for other phones too. I made it for/ with other dev who wanted to have one step to make root and permissive.
I do not know how will respond to majisk, so better off to try ununstall that first, and start fresh.
Just as the title says, the new natwest app update (2018 June) refuses to work when Xposed Framework is enabled, but runs find when the framework is disabled. I am interested to know how it detects when the framework is operational, and how can I fool the app into running while Xposed framework is running.
Here is my system:
Samsung Galaxy S5
running Lineage OS 14.1, rooted
Xposed framework version 89
I have tried a number of methods to hide the running framework with no success
Tried DotMod to hide xposed --> not working
Tried XprivacyLua, denying all sorts of permissions such as view activity and running apps --> not working
Only works when i disable the framework and restart the phone. But that is ofcourse tiresome, cos no one wants to restart their entire phone just to check their bank app.
Current solution is to revert to previous versions of natwest bank app, but again that is trivial, as sooner or later they will refuse to work on outdated apps and force update.
Talking to the dev team, the only clue they mention is their new app checks the memory for running malicious apps, and if it detects anything it refuses to run. So it is not safetynet (infact safetynet fails, but the app runs)
Fair enough, but ive tried denying it literally all permissions, both from Privacy guard of lineage os 14.1 and XprivacyLua, and nothing works. Either the app is using some clever method to bypass these, or they dont do their work properly.
I miss old xprivacy, where you had a billion more options within permissions, with info of when and what did each app accessed.
I need xposed in order to disable my proximity sensor which is broken, and constantly thinks the value is zero, hence blacking out my screen during calls
Any help or advice will be much appreciated.
I believe it was with the 2016 November security update that Google changed something that forced an update to Xposed that made it practically impossible to hide. Xposed is easily detectable in the running zygote (something you can't hide), and the only solution is the one you've already found; disable and reboot.
i keep reading many times now "the only solution is reboot" - that is not a solution, we need to find a way to better hide xposed. Perhaps I need to research a bit more on zygote and find out and how it works exactly, and see if there is a way to mask it. Honestly all these android updates are pissing me off, its getting harder and harder to mod your phone, and I dont get why they struggle so hard to make it difficult for us modders.
I will attempt to flash back to kitkat and try, I would not be suprised if it ends up working.
In the windows enviroment you can always do wtv ur heart desires, and if that means destroying your PC so be it. But in android enviroment is so damn hard, and no devs want to share how they implement things in fear of someone hacking them or wtv. But all this is doing is hurting modders, making us hate some apps with harsh rules and moving away, doesnt do any good for anyone!!
It's perfectly possible to hide Xposed if you downgrade to a security patch prior to November -16. You're likely gonna have to dig around a bit for the proper files and versions though.
And believe me, there have been some pretty brilliant minds that have tried to find a way to hide Xposed and found it not to be possible. Of course, "nothing's impossible" and maybe someone with a brilliant idea finds a miraculous way. You never know...
We are now working on the new Xposed API, which allows modules to get / set scope, to get framework info, and to store configs across apps without the embarrassing New-XSharedPreferences interface. The API library will be released to GitHub/libxposed and maven central after it is ready.
Now we are considering removal of resources hook in the incoming new API, so we need to know whether it is still needed or unreplaceable for some modules.
About why we want to remove this API: Resources hook is very hard to maintain and is even not fully supported now under some frameworks (e.g. Taichi). So even if we keep it, it will be maintain-only.
Old modules can still use this feature. We are just considering remove it in the new API.
You can vote at the LSPosed Telegram group or write your opinion here. Also we are glad to hear your suggestions about the new API.
@AndroidX @siavash79 @Dark_Eyes_ @firefds @David B. @Quinny899 @wanam
Just mentioning you guys since you're all active here on XDA. Please see the first post.
Regards,
shadowstep
Senior Moderator
Dr-TSNG said:
We are now working on the new Xposed API, which allows modules to get / set scope, to get framework info, and to store configs across apps without the embarrassing New-XSharedPreferences interface. The API library will be released to GitHub/libxposed and maven central after it is ready.
Now we are considering removal of resources hook in the incoming new API, so we need to know whether it is still needed or unreplaceable for some modules.
About why we want to remove this API: Resources hook is very hard to maintain and is even not fully supported now under some frameworks (e.g. Taichi). So even if we keep it, it will be maintain-only.
Old modules can still use this feature. We are just considering remove it in the new API.
You can vote at the LSPosed Telegram group or write your opinion here. Also we are glad to hear your suggestions about the new API.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for getting opinions
1. Xshared preferences interface overhaul is good news since it was always unstable for me. I personally switched to remote preferences API for AOSPMods
2. When going to systemUI and framework, it's sometimes very difficult and complicated to change some variable values through Xposed, specially with R8 code optimizations which dramatically limit the points we can hook into code.
There are two workarounds I know of, being Xposed resource hooking that can be also dynamic in runtime, or overlays, which being static, still limit the way we can change resources dramatically.
So, I'd really suggest keeping it in the API
siavash79 said:
2. When going to systemUI and framework, it's sometimes very difficult and complicated to change some variable values through Xposed, specially with R8 code optimizations which dramatically limit the points we can hook into code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For R8 code optimizations, we introduced a new API to parse dex file, which allows modules to find methods/fields more accurately.
Anyway if we finally decide to keep resources hook API, do you have any suggestions on keeping/adding/removing specific methods of it or refine it to a more modern interface?
Perfect news.
About resource hooking, few things to note are that: it can't differentiate between different resource files, for example normal values vs landscape or dark/light values. It would be great if there's a way to push different values to different resource files.
Also, there are more limitations when talking about special resources such as themes. As an example, in AOSPMods, one of the reasons it's a magisk module instead of being a normal APK is that overlay files have to be used in cases that need modification of theme resources and that can't be done via resource hooking.
I personally love to get a more complete/flexible resource hooking API, but I completely understand if that's too much to ask. So even keeping it as currently is would be good enough
Thank you @shadowstep for bringing this to my attention!
Dr-TSNG said:
We are now working on the new Xposed API, which allows modules to get / set scope, to get framework info, and to store configs across apps without the embarrassing New-XSharedPreferences interface. The API library will be released to GitHub/libxposed and maven central after it is ready.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's wonderful news, although I do not quite understand what you have against the new XSharedPreferences interface. I use it in my modules, and I've never had any issues with it.
Dr-TSNG said:
Now we are considering removal of resources hook in the incoming new API, so we need to know whether it is still needed or unreplaceable for some modules.
About why we want to remove this API: Resources hook is very hard to maintain and is even not fully supported now under some frameworks (e.g. Taichi). So even if we keep it, it will be maintain-only.
Old modules can still use this feature. We are just considering remove it in the new API.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not currently using the resources hook in any of my modules, so removing it would not impact me, but even so, I'm not a fan of the suggestion to get rid of it completely. I think that at the very least, it should be kept as maintain-only. It is unfortunate that it does not work with Taichi, but given that Taichi isn't a true Xposed implementation, I'm not sure that it's worth worrying about.
This looks great, I've been waiting for it since the initial issue talking about it. Prefs are always a pain to handle, and while the "new" method worked, I always preferred to use a Content Provider, which was nerfed in Android 12.
Really like the idea of setting the scope, it would be beneficial to the Xposed part of DarQ, the only suggestion I have is to make sure it includes some sort of "am I enabled?" check - currently I use self hooks (literally the module hooking itself and changing a method returning false to true) to verify it's enabled, but it doesn't seem to be foolproof as people sometimes still complain it doesn't work.
Quinny899 said:
the only suggestion I have is to make sure it includes some sort of "am I enabled?" check
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course does, and the module app can get more info about the the Xposed state like it's under which framework and which version, and whether it is rootless or not without self-hooking.
You can view the detail here.
@shadowstep Thanks for the head up.
Glad to see a new api to manage configs across apps, shared prefs has been always painful to handle even with the new-xshared prefs.
I would suggest having an api to get the version name of scope's package, I'm aware of some workarounds that help get the version name, but it's not a reliable solution on the latest Android versions, this information is needed for logging/debugging purposes.
@Dr-TSNG thanks and keep up the good work.
@Dr-TSNG Thanks for new api I was wating for this api from more then 1 year coz when I build my first module (Android Faker) its was really pain in ass coz of Xsharedpreference after some research I found better solution which was remote preference but Quinny899 mention in Github issue that its not work in android 11 so after that I move to new Xsharedpreference which was introduce by lsposed team and its working great but its still create issue in some devices so I think it will be a better solution if we get it soon and I am not sure about resources hook coz I don't use it before .
The problem with xshared preferences is that if the apk is a system app it won't work for some reason. Only works on user apps
siavash79 said:
The problem with xshared preferences is that if the apk is a system app it won't work for some reason. Only works on user apps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. I use XSharedPreferences in a System Framework hook and haven't had any issues with it.
David B. said:
Interesting. I use XSharedPreferences in a System Framework hook and haven't had any issues with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is your module installed as APK or as magisk module?
Try mounting it to system through magisk and preferences will stop working
siavash79 said:
Is your module installed as APK or as magisk module?
Try mounting it to system through magisk and preferences will stop working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's installed as an APK. I misunderstood what you had said earlier. I thought you meant that the hook doesn't work when you try to use it on system APKs. I didn't realize that you meant that it doesn't work when the module is itself a system APK.
siavash79Yeah I agree with this and in my testing if you set target sdk 23 its doesn't matter if its as system app or user its work without any issues but its not worth coz it have some other issues
Thank you for accepting the API invokeSpecial() !
Add invokeSpecial · libxposed/[email protected]
Fix #2
github.com
Implement invoke special and new instance special · LSPosed/[email protected]
LSPosed Framework. Contribute to LSPosed/LSPosed development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Looking forward to the new API release.
Happy Chinese New Year!
I just want to see @M66B happy again
Somewhat unrelated, but is there any chance of seeing original Xprivacy return or compatibility? I think it's a lot better than Lua
lawrencee said:
Somewhat unrelated, but is there any chance of seeing original Xprivacy return or compatibility? I think it's a lot better than Lua
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Xprivacy will never "return".
XPrivacyLua is the best ever