Enable ANT+ - Verizon Motorola Droid Turbo Q&A, Help & Troublesh

I'm looking to know if is possible to enable ant+ on Droid Turbo, actually I don't know if the wireless chips is ant+ compatible of if there is a ROM with ant+ already enalbed.
Thanks

ntnmst said:
I'm looking to know if is possible to enable ant+ on Droid Turbo, actually I don't know if the wireless chips is ant+ compatible of if there is a ROM with ant+ already enalbed.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this page says the Snapdragon 805 is ANT+.
https://www.quora.com/Which-is-faster-the-Mediatek-MT6595-octa-core-or-the-Snapdragon-805-Quad-core
Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 is a 32-bit ARMv7A based SoC made using 28nm HPm process technology.
It is a quad-core SoC with 4x Krait 450 processors clocked at upto 2.7GHz. Krait 450 is a bug-free update of Krait 400 which is based on ARM Cortex-A15.
Adreno 420 GPU
Cat. 6 LTE
802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1 LE, ANT+
Upto 4K HD (3840 x 2160) display controller
Upto 55MP image signal processor
H.265 4K video record & playback
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola Quarks have Snapdragon 805. The Droid Turbo is a Quark.
But I don't know whether any custom ROMs for Quarks like CM12.1 or Resurrection Remix have that feature.
CM12 did NOT support ANT+, but I don't know about current 12.1. Here's the request:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.org/topic/104511-missing-ant-support/

ChazzMatt said:
this page says the Snapdragon 805 is ANT+.
https://www.quora.com/Which-is-faster-the-Mediatek-MT6595-octa-core-or-the-Snapdragon-805-Quad-core
Motorola Quarks have Snapdragon 805. The Droid Turbo is a Quark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think is not so easy... wireless chip is different from SoC
http://forum.xda-developers.com/hardware-hacking/hardware/ref-devices-ant-hardware-t2879990
and to understand if is possible to enable ant+ the first thing is to know the chip model & vendor
https://github.com/ant-wireless/ANT_in_Android
I do some search on the net, but without success

ntnmst said:
I think is not so easy... wireless chip is different from SoC
http://forum.xda-developers.com/hardware-hacking/hardware/ref-devices-ant-hardware-t2879990
and to understand if is possible to enable ant+ the first thing is to know the chip model & vendor
https://github.com/ant-wireless/ANT_in_Android
I do some search on the net, but without success
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM12 did NOT support ANT+, but I don't know about current 12.1. Here's the request from last February :
http://forum.cyanogenmod.org/topic/104511-missing-ant-support/

Related

Smartphone hacking without risk – plus, broken phones needed

http://hackaday.com/2011/09/06/smartphone-hacking-without-risk-plus-broken-phones-needed/
Scrolled into this article today. Thought some here might find some benefit to this community.
this has been covered on the front page a couple of times already, and it's only for phones with cortex A8 processors. the droid 3 users a TI omap processor so it wont wont
The D3 has a TI OMAP4 SoC which includes a dual core ARM Cortex A9 processor.
Think of these SoCs (OMAP, Tegra, Snapdraggon, etc) as an entire computer (motherboard, CPU, graphics card, etc) on a single chip.
But yeah, this guy is working with the A8, while the D3 and all current generation phones use A9 based CPUs. Maybe it will apply though, idk.
sorry, what i should have said was it requires a samsung hummingbird
this is a hardware mod, and the devs posted a list of all the phones its applicable to here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236273

change cpu ?

with the new exynos and mtk octa core in the market , i was wandering if its possible for our phone to change cpu ? would a octa core be compatible ?
That is not PC dude. Anyway it would be great if possible
I don't think so. The motherboard may be not compitable with new cpu
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
kessaras said:
with the new exynos and mtk octa core in the market , i was wandering if its possible for our phone to change cpu ? would a octa core be compatible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh no sorry, there are two challenges that you would have too overcome, the first being the hardware aspect. The tegra 3 SoC isn't just a CPU but APU that has both a CPU and GPU on the same chip. This chip is physically soldered to the motherboard. While its not inconceivable that a very skilled person might be able to remove the chip and replace it with an identical chip (in theory).
You cant replace the tegra chip with another for both hardware and software incompatibilites, our phones whole motherboard is designed around the tegra3 and its very intricate details of operation. But let's pretend the hardware will be compatible and a exynos octa core is what we will use, the next problem is software. The kernel is the core of an operating system, on the arm platform the Linux kernel is different to that of x86 based devices, arm devices need extremely specific kernel support, you would in essence have to rewrite or re engineer an entire devices specific hardware support in the kernel, for scale the difference between mainline 3.1 and the 3.1 android kernel in our device is about a million lines of code, I'd guess lge's changes would be around 50,000 lines of code for our device.
But I somehow don't think its worth it
kessaras said:
with the new exynos and mtk octa core in the market , i was wandering if its possible for our phone to change cpu ? would a octa core be compatible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? You would lose access to THD games
Sent from my LG-P880 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
right the whole kernel must change. too much for me

[Question] Moto G 2014 Processor Model

So, i got curious and downloaded the "CPU z" application to have a look at my phones specs in detail. I found that my processor was the "4x ARM Cortex A7 @1.19Ghz". however the advertised processor is the "1.20GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 400" now, is this just a pre-manufacturing model name and I'm just being stupid or is something fishy going on here?
Also i find it odd that the actual processor in my device is clocked at 1.19 when i in fact was under the idea that it's a 1.20 clock speed. I'm sure it wouldn't make that much difference but still seem odd?
could someone put my mind at rest and tell me that I'm just being an amateur and to go back into my android noobie cave or can someone confirm that in fact something fishy is going down.
thanks!
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/400
Snapdragon 400 processor specs
CPU
Up to 1.7 GHz dual-core Krait 300 CPU or up to 1.6GHz quad-core ARM® Cortex™ A7 CPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And don't worry about the clock speed.
I hope this answers your question.
Abruzini said:
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/400
And don't worry about the clock speed.
I hope this answers your question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks ^_^

Unleashing The Snapdragon 820

Hey guys, i'm looking for a new phone, and i'm considering the 3/32 version of the mi5...the only thing i don't like is the Snapdragon 820 clocked at 1.8 instead of 2.15...and still have to figure out if the Adreno 530 is underclocked too...is there any possibility to unleash the full potential of this SoC?
Guarino95 said:
Hey guys, i'm looking for a new phone, and i'm considering the 3/32 version of the mi5...the only thing i don't like is the Snapdragon 820 clocked at 1.8 instead of 2.15...and still have to figure out if the Adreno 530 is underclocked too...is there any possibility to unleash the full potential of this SoC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wondering the same thing
It isn't possible now because Xiaomi hasn't released the Kernel sources yet. With kernel sources you can overclock it in theory but the base model Sd820 isn't the same as the one in the pro or prime mi5. It may not run stably on higher clocks.
Assuming you trust Mi5Devs, then this table shall say the difference:
https://github.com/Mi5Devs/android_device_xiaomi_gemini
leledumbo said:
Assuming you trust Mi5Devs, then this table shall say the difference:
https://github.com/Mi5Devs/android_device_xiaomi_gemini
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
webcool123 said:
It isn't possible now because Xiaomi hasn't released the Kernel sources yet. With kernel sources you can overclock it in theory but the base model Sd820 isn't the same as the one in the pro or prime mi5. It may not run stably on higher clocks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So considering that table the only difference is the clock, since board codes are the same...anyway as long as i've read, there is very little chance that xiaomi is going to release the kernel sources before than Q1/Q2 of next year...am i right?
Guarino95 said:
So considering that table the only difference is the clock, since board codes are the same...anyway as long as i've read, there is very little chance that xiaomi is going to release the kernel sources before than Q1/Q2 of next year...am i right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming the 6-month-source-code-release-after-device-release cycle is consistent, then Mi5 source code might be released next month. So far, their Qualcomm devices always have source code released. Let's just hope for the best.
So, is it possible now?
32gb ver is underclocked and poor performance, thus not recommended to increase cpu speed

Why there is much better support in roms for Snapdragon than Mediatek smartphones?

I was wondering why there is much better support for Qualcomm Snapdragon version of Leeco smarphones than the one with Mediatek MTK?
For example check out the LineageOS (download.lineageos.org) or pixel or any other line of android's, all of them are developed for Snapdragon version. All recent versions of Android Oreo or Pie are developed and supporting Snapdragon SoC.
Can someone explain me what is the reason for such weak support in recent android versions for the case of Leeco (for example Leeco S3 X626) with MTK cpu?
Edited:
Seems like I find partially the answer in: https://www.xda-developers.com/mediatek-source-code-release-no-plans
However, I thought that android source kernel is open source so it can be compile by anyone for any SoC, I mean new source kernels has already implemented new CPUs right? Or am I wrong?

Categories

Resources