Android Trojan in ASUS WebStorage (Android.gmobi) - MeMO Pad 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

This is a few days old now but I saw this article...
http://www.zdnet.com/article/android-trojan-infiltrates-mobile-firmware-trend-micro-apps/
It specifically mentioned ASUS WebStorage...
The researchers say that apps including Trend Micro Dr.Safety, Dr.Booster, and Asus WebStorage have been affected by the malware.
The security team informed the companies of the issues, and now TrendMicro Dr.Safety and TrendMicro Dr.Booster, at least, have disabled intrusive functions. Asus is considering how best to tackle the problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do we need to be concerned about this on our ASUS MeMO Pad 7?
Thanks.

Related

Developers: any links to best practices for Gear development?

Okay, new to this. Started up a gear yesterday and I'm impressed. Now I want to go further... (already bored lol). Any links to docs on how to develop for this thing. I already know that this it is standard Android and that one can write standalone apps the usual way for this thing. What I'm interested in is how the communication model works with companion apps on the phone. I suspect it will be done by running services on the phone, but how can one interact with those services via a Bluetooth connection. Or is it event driven?
I'm really surprised that Samsung hasn't publiced anything about this on their site? What? Don't they like developers to jump on the bandwagon?
Best advice is to read this forum you will learn all there is to know
Sent from my SM-N9005
appelflap said:
Okay, new to this. Started up a gear yesterday and I'm impressed. Now I want to go further... (already bored lol). Any links to docs on how to develop for this thing. I already know that this it is standard Android and that one can write standalone apps the usual way for this thing. What I'm interested in is how the communication model works with companion apps on the phone. I suspect it will be done by running services on the phone, but how can one interact with those services via a Bluetooth connection. Or is it event driven?
I'm really surprised that Samsung hasn't publiced anything about this on their site? What? Don't they like developers to jump on the bandwagon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe the SDK has been released yet, welcome to the gear community nether the less.
fOmey said:
I don't believe the SDK has been released yet, welcome to the gear community nether the less.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you think they work with special APIs? Or just the standard APIs? I saw there were already some interesting apps on the Samsung market like for example Zine. It has a controller architecture. On the Gear side you get headlines pushed and by tapping on a headline the Zine app is opened with the corresponding article. Can this can be done with standard Android APIs or do we need a special APIs for that. I can imagine that this can be done with the standard event model.
@lucf I did, couldn't find anything interesting wrt this topic. If you stumble upon some good posts let me know! Thx
Appears that Samsung kept it 'invite-only' for now:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57609639-94/this-is-why-there-arent-more-samsung-galaxy-gear-apps/
CLARiiON said:
Appears that Samsung kept it 'invite-only' for now:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57609639-94/this-is-why-there-arent-more-samsung-galaxy-gear-apps/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Crap, so it does work with proprietary APIs? Right, might return this thing and wait till it is open for development, cheaper and will have more apps. They should have written that on the box. With their crap apps.
appelflap said:
Crap, so it does work with proprietary APIs? Right, might return this thing and wait till it is open for development, cheaper and will have more apps. They should have written that on the box. With their crap apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"We need to make sure we're ready to go big."
Thats a quote from the article, they will be released. Although not just yet..
they never said they will release the sdk to the public, did they? so please stop making false claims.
samsung might as well decide that they are not ready to go big with this generation (lack of wifi, poor software etc). what then?
hurdlejade said:
they never said they will release the sdk to the public, did they? so please stop making false claims.
samsung might as well decide that they are not ready to go big with this generation (lack of wifi, poor software etc). what then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's definitely a remarkable manoeuvre. Another remarkable thing is that everything is kept in the Samsung app store. It's not a secret that Samsung has big ambitions. Maybe they are trying to build their own ecosystem in the Android ecosystem. Maybe they gonna lock the APIs in some kind of Samsung Appstore service. Meh .. let's hope Google comes up with a watch soon and an addition to the Android framework for smart watches.
I recently tried to release an app to the Samsung store specifically for the gear but it was rejected for "other" reasons...
Seems like the public are just unknowing beta testers of a half-arsed device by Samsung.
n13astra said:
I recently tried to release an app to the Samsung store specifically for the gear but it was rejected for "other" reasons...
Seems like the public are just unknowing beta testers of a half-arsed device by Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? What did you try to submit? A simple standalone app that only runs on the gear?
appelflap said:
Really? What did you try to submit? A simple standalone app that only runs on the gear?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried to release my Calculator app that only runs on the Gear. I've since emailed back asking what "other" reasons they are talking about.
Just speculation on my part --
I have a feeling that Samsung is simply testing waters with this initial release of Gear. They are very serious about it, but they also know that it's not entirely polished product. They wanted to be first to market.
I think the 2rev of Gear might have some radical changes. They could probably build it on top of Kitkat (optimized for low memory devices?) and some new low energy communication protocols. Probably they will then open the APIs for all devs. Maybe we will also see some of the curved screen goodness!
But it's for sure they will never make the Gear compatible with all Android by default -- doesn't make a good business sense. Google will obviously try to make their smartwatch compatible with all Android, and that makes perfect business sense for google.
n13astra said:
Tried to release my Calculator app that only runs on the Gear. I've since emailed back asking what "other" reasons they are talking about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you the guy who made it? nice. i sideloaded it into my Gear. works flawlessly, althought I would like to see some colored theme like numbers in one color, functions in other. 5 stars from me! super lite too!
Thanks...The coloured buttons are on the way...

[Q] access to sd card for secondary users

I discover recently a limitation with android users account on tablets.
Only the propietary account is able to access sd card or usb, not the secondary accounts.
Is there a way to hack this limitation?
ASUS Transformer TF701T
[ROM] CROMi-X TF701T
Google Nexus 4
CM 10.2.1
guerito73 said:
I discover recently a limitation with android users account on tablets.
Only the propietary account is able to access sd card or usb, not the secondary accounts.
Is there a way to hack this limitation?
ASUS Transformer TF701T
[ROM] CROMi-X TF701T
Google Nexus 4
CM 10.2.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that I am aware of no. Google have forced it this way by design, I assume as a security feature.
sbdags said:
Not that I am aware of no. Google have forced it this way by design, I assume as a security feature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is of what I was afraid, thank you for the confirmation.
Big restriction for muti user....
sbdags said:
Not that I am aware of no. Google have forced it this way by design, I assume as a security feature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is of what I was afraid, thank you for the confirmation.
Big restriction for muti user....
July 2022, LOS 18.1/ Android 11. Any hack for this BS in the meantime? (let me admit: with each day on, I hate Android more and more. We at least deserve choices, rather than be dictated more and more by effin' Google ... (( )

[Amazon Fire 7 7th gen] Root via Adb and Fastboot?

Hi, I am just making sure that rooting via ADB and Fastboot on Fire 7 7th gen has been tried and has be said failed. Or am I just missing something? Thanks!
dro3m said:
Hi, I am just making sure that rooting via ADB and Fastboot on Fire 7 7th gen has been tried and has be said failed. Or am I just missing something? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JakeTse said:
So have you tried rooting the Amazon Fire tablet with other rooting apps? I am not sure that it is ADB's problem, but it is worth a try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then obstacles 'blocking' root access are well understood. Highlights:
- no known (exploitable) vulnerabilities in FireOS 5.3.2.1 and above
- locked bootloader restricts access to recovery and system partitions
- crippled fastboot environment; most commands don't work
- signed and partially encrypted bootloader
Basically Amazon is using the same approach to secure their device as some of the major carriers (eg: Verizon) which is time proven and effective. A sloppy rollout of early 5th gen devices left some doors open; those are now closed. It would seem the same thing happened with the recent HD 10 refresh which uses a different architecture. In contrast, the 32-bit hardware platform used in the 7th gen Fire 7 is mature and well understood.
Is it possible a new vulnerability will be discovered? Sure. Is it likely given the considerable efforts of Google, Amazon and other 'majors' to harden Android and underlying firmware? Will leave that for others to ponder.
Davey126 said:
Then obstacles 'blocking' root access are well understood. Highlights:
- no known (exploitable) vulnerabilities in FireOS 5.3.2.1 and above
- locked bootloader restricts access to recovery and system partitions
- crippled fastboot environment; most commands don't work
- signed and partially encrypted bootloader
Basically Amazon is using the same approach to secure their device as some of the major carriers (eg: Verizon) which is time proven and effective. A sloppy rollout of early 5th gen devices left some doors open; those are now closed. It would seem the same thing happened with the recent HD 10 refresh which uses a different architecture. In contrast, the 32-bit hardware platform used in the 7th gen Fire 7 is mature and well understood.
Is it possible a new vulnerability will be discovered? Sure. Is it likely given the considerable efforts of Google, Amazon and other 'majors' to harden Android and underlying firmware? Will leave that for others to ponder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for letting me know, I just hate all those patches and bloatware because they take up so mush space. Now I can't even uninstall the bloatware, they just reinstall themselves even with no internet. I also don't like the launcher. The layout is dumb had it's full of ads. I just don't understand why they have to make Android unrootable. Makes no sense.
dro3m said:
Thanks for letting me know, I just hate all those patches and bloatware because they take up so mush space. Now I can't even uninstall the bloatware, they just reinstall themselves even with no internet. I also don't like the launcher. The layout is dumb had it's full of ads. I just don't understand why they have to make Android unrootable. Makes no sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes perfect sense as Fire devices are designed, marketed and sold as captive portals to Amazon's vast ecosystem. They are not intended to be generic Android devices that you can customize to your liking.
Davey126 said:
Makes perfect sense as Fire devices are designed, marketed and sold as captive portals to Amazon's vast ecosystem. They are not intended to be generic Android devices that you can customize to your liking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to say, but they should put back key Android features like custom launcher and better Google Apps support.
Sent from my KFAUWI using Tapatalk
dro3m said:
I have to say, but they should put back key Android features like custom launcher and better Google Apps support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? How does that serve Amazon's business model? There are many generic Android tablets on the market if you want those capabilities/features.
Davey126 said:
Then obstacles 'blocking' root access are well understood. Highlights:
- no known (exploitable) vulnerabilities in FireOS 5.3.2.1 and above
- locked bootloader restricts access to recovery and system partitions
- crippled fastboot environment; most commands don't work
- signed and partially encrypted bootloader
Basically Amazon is using the same approach to secure their device as some of the major carriers (eg: Verizon) which is time proven and effective. A sloppy rollout of early 5th gen devices left some doors open; those are now closed. It would seem the same thing happened with the recent HD 10 refresh which uses a different architecture. In contrast, the 32-bit hardware platform used in the 7th gen Fire 7 is mature and well understood.
Is it possible a new vulnerability will be discovered? Sure. Is it likely given the considerable efforts of Google, Amazon and other 'majors' to harden Android and underlying firmware? Will leave that for others to ponder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something weird is going on in regards to the HD 10. Looks like a dirty cow root and the method I'm using to modify (fix) the framework, is one I found on XDA from 2013 if I recall correctly. It's almost like it's the good old days when everything could be rooted. After all, it takes KingoRoot less than a minute, maybe 45 seconds. Last time I saw a privelage escalation that quick was right about 2014 or 15. Not long before DC was patched. So is Amazon refreshing their tablets with old software and hardware?
DragonFire1024 said:
Something weird is going on in regards to the HD 10. Looks like a dirty cow root and the method I'm using to modify (fix) the framework, is one I found on XDA from 2013 if I recall correctly. It's almost like it's the good old days when everything could be rooted. After all, it takes KingoRoot less than a minute, maybe 45 seconds. Last time I saw a privelage escalation that quick was right about 2014 or 15. Not long before DC was patched. So is Amazon refreshing their tablets with old software and hardware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, well I do here that theuare going to update their tablets to Android 7.1. That could leave some doors open.
Sent from my KFAUWI using Tapatalk
Davey126 said:
Why? How does that serve Amazon's business model? There are many generic Android tablets on the market if you want those capabilities/features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, I know. But people are trying to bypass that and Amazon is trying to patch it, which takes up space. A 8GB model only has about 5.56GB of usable space. Their are also a crap ton of Amazon Apps. They should at least conbain them so they don't take up so much space. And those generic Android tablets a junk. At least the on it the $50 price range. The only good one is the RCA tablet you can get a Walmart. The worst one I ever used is a Digiland I bought at Best buy.
Sent from my KFAUWI using Tapatalk
dro3m said:
Yea, I know. But people are trying to bypass that and Amazon is trying to patch it, which takes up space. A 8GB model only has about 5.56GB of usable space. Their are also a crap ton of Amazon Apps. They should at least conbain them so they don't take up so much space. And those generic Android tablets a junk. At least the on it the $50 price range. The only good one is the RCA tablet you can get a Walmart. The worst one I ever used is a Digiland I bought at Best buy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of that serves as justification for change. What more space? Update to the 16 GB model or HD 8. Don't like Amazon apps? Buy a different device. Amazon is a business they derives revenue from the sale of products/services, not the sale of tablets. Fire and Kindle gizmos are designed to feed that machine. Catering to a competitor doesn't really work.
---------- Post added at 01:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 PM ----------
DragonFire1024 said:
Something weird is going on in regards to the HD 10. Looks like a dirty cow root and the method I'm using to modify (fix) the framework, is one I found on XDA from 2013 if I recall correctly. It's almost like it's the good old days when everything could be rooted. After all, it takes KingoRoot less than a minute, maybe 45 seconds. Last time I saw a privelage escalation that quick was right about 2014 or 15. Not long before DC was patched. So is Amazon refreshing their tablets with old software and hardware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HD 10 uses a different (64-bit) architecture which likely utilizes rewritten or 3rd party code that has not been fully vetted. Take advantages of the vulnerabilities now as Amazon is likely working on patches. Same thing happened on 2nd, 3rd and some 5th gen devices when first introduced.
Davey126 said:
None of that serves as justification for change. What more space? Update to the 16 GB model or HD 8. Don't like Amazon apps? Buy a different device. Amazon is a business they derives revenue of the sale of products/services, not the sale of tablets. Fire and Kindle gizmos are designed to feed that machine. Catering to a competitor doesn't really work.
---------- Post added at 01:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 PM ----------
HD 10 uses a different (64-bit) architecture which likely utilizes rewritten or 3rd party code that has not been fully vetted. Take advantages of the vulnerabilities now as Amazon is likely working on patches. Same thing happened on 2nd, 3rd and some 5th gen devices when first introduced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's given me the chance to do a lot of research and experiments. The amount of stuff I got and am getting working now in the last two weeks is staggering. FireOS isn't so bad, once you are able to lift nearly all restrictions.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using XDA Labs
DragonFire1024 said:
It's given me the chance to do a lot of research and experiments. The amount of stuff I got and am getting working now in the last two weeks is staggering. FireOS isn't so bad, once you are able to lift nearly all restrictions.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of restrictions?
Sent from my KFAUWI using Tapatalk
Davey126 said:
None of that serves as justification for change. What more space? Update to the 16 GB model or HD 8. Don't like Amazon apps? Buy a different device. Amazon is a business they derives revenue of the sale of products/services, not the sale of tablets. Fire and Kindle gizmos are designed to feed that machine. Catering to a competitor doesn't really work.
---------- Post added at 01:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 PM ----------
HD 10 uses a different (64-bit) architecture which likely utilizes rewritten or 3rd party code that has not been fully vetted. Take advantages of the vulnerabilities now as Amazon is likely working on patches. Same thing happened on 2nd, 3rd and some 5th gen devices when first introduced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Come on! I just a middle school nerd. I don't have no job, although, I want to get so I can get a Asus Zenfone 5z
Sent from my KFAUWI using Tapatalk
dro3m said:
What kind of restrictions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Getting ready to make a thread now for example, wifi optimization. Not sure what Amazon was thinking in restricting that but I enabled dual band support, allowed wifi to scan whenever it's down, unless turned off. I have the daydream screen saver fully operational, colors included. That's just some of the things.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using XDA Labs
DragonFire1024 said:
Getting ready to make a thread now for example, wifi optimization. Not sure what Amazon was thinking in restricting that but I enabled dual band support, allowed wifi to scan whenever it's down, unless turned off. I have the daydream screen saver fully operational, colors included. That's just some of the things.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have any guide of how to do that?
Sent from my KFAUWI using Tapatalk
DragonFire1024 said:
Getting ready to make a thread now for example, wifi optimization. Not sure what Amazon was thinking in restricting that but I enabled dual band support, allowed wifi to scan whenever it's down, unless turned off. I have the daydream screen saver fully operational, colors included. That's just some of the things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WiFi scanning is a huge battery suck with marginal benefits; most disable it once becoming aware of the tradeoff. Not sure why dual band support is disabled on your 7th gen. Could be the channels your AP is using if the Fire WiFi 'chip' doesn't support DFS.
Davey126 said:
WiFi scanning is a huge battery suck with marginal benefits; most disable it once becoming aware of the tradeoff. Not sure why dual band support is disabled on your 7th gen. Could be the channels your AP is using if the Fire WiFi 'chip' doesn't support DFS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The setting was blocked. The support is there, but wasn't available to toggle. If there is a drain, it's very little. Maybe we aren't talking about the same thing. I'll post findings later. I had a minor setback
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using XDA Labs
The lack of space
Davey126 said:
Makes perfect sense as Fire devices are designed, marketed and sold as captive portals to Amazon's vast ecosystem. They are not intended to be generic Android devices that you can customize to your liking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So Amazon's "vast ecosystem" is not that well patrolled and does not have near the functionality of the regular play story. There are apps on the Amazon Eco system that are utter rubbish (like the early days of the google play store) the difference is that there is not a good policing system to get rid of the rubbish or instinctive the devs to list the apps for the correct categories. Amazon's eco system is rip for phising and scam artists to get to older people who buy devices like this. I am one of the those people who clean up the malware, phising, and crap that filters in from an unmaintained eco system.
First a lock device is always like a challenge. There has to be a way in. Second. There are so many of us out here that major manufacturers should know by know that it only takes a little time for anyone to unlock or break a devices.
herdrichzoo said:
So Amazon's "vast ecosystem" is not that well patrolled and does not have near the functionality of the regular play story. There are apps on the Amazon Eco system that are utter rubbish (like the early days of the google play store) the difference is that there is not a good policing system to get rid of the rubbish or instinctive the devs to list the apps for the correct categories. Amazon's eco system is rip for phising and scam artists to get to older people who buy devices like this. I am one of the those people who clean up the malware, phising, and crap that filters in from an unmaintained eco system.
First a lock device is always like a challenge. There has to be a way in. Second. There are so many of us out here that major manufacturers should know by know that it only takes a little time for anyone to unlock or break a devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Concur on the state of Amazon's app store recognizing it is just a small corner of the full ecosystem. Unlikely to get substantially better given limited revenue potential. Falls into the 'good enough' box where Amazon excels.
As for device lock-downs Amazon has a pretty good track record. It's really not that hard with proper emphasis and code management. The sloppy past is not likely to widely repeat itself going forward. Not saying it will be absolute but no low hanging fruit where the vast majority of prior vulnerabilities reside.
Davey126 said:
Concur on the state of Amazon's app store recognizing it is just a small corner of the full ecosystem. Unlikely to get substantially better given limited revenue potential. Falls into the 'good enough' box where Amazon excels.
As for device lock-downs Amazon has a pretty good track record. It's really not that hard with proper emphasis and code management. The sloppy past is not likely to widely repeat itself going forward. Not saying it will be absolute but no low hanging fruit where the vast majority of prior vulnerabilities reside.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm convinced there's a way and i think we're closer than we were 2 weeks ago at unlocking these things. I've noticed a few things here and there. I remember one thing you said to me way back when...about replacing the ecosystem piece by piece. Almost all I've done with the framework and settings and various other things, it seems Amazon just pushed Android out of the way, rather than create their own "os". I'm simply undoing their pushings and replacing it with the Android code, which by the way, in most cases, they don't delete. If they did that with the system, it's possible they did that in the other partitions. Unfortunately, I haven't even glanced at most of the other partitions. Mostly because it's a whole nother level.

Can some one help me figure if possible to put linux on this tablet?

I own a 5th generation fire tablet. If specs are required I'll be happy to share them. I got this tablet on a crazy deal for $10.00 USD. I bought it for ****s and giggles and to tinker with it. I recently charged it up again trying to find a use for it but all the app in the Amazon store are total **** and I dont play any of them further more. Its littered with adds to buy stuff. I been using it literally as a paper weight for a book I have been reading. I am knowledgeable in rooting and moding by tinkering with my older phones. I want to know how if at all, is it possible to just get rid of Fire OS for some version of linux. Please help me if you know how thank you.
Linux? No, I don't believe there are versions of Linux you can install on the Fire.
If your device hasn't upgraded to a version of the OS newer than FireOS 5.3.1 (I believe it is), you can root it and then follow one of the guides here to install LineageOS or the NexusRom for a more stock Android experience.
If you can't root and flash a custom rom, you can still follow the guides here to install the Google Play store at the very least to get a much wider array of apps you can install. You can also follow the debloat guides to disable and replace a lot of the Amazon apps and launcher, to get a better android tablet experience.
But linux, no. Not that I am aware of.
Rbohannon89 said:
I own a 5th generation fire tablet. If specs are required I'll be happy to share them. I got this tablet on a crazy deal for $10.00 USD. I bought it for ****s and giggles and to tinker with it. I recently charged it up again trying to find a use for it but all the app in the Amazon store are total **** and I dont play any of them further more. Its littered with adds to buy stuff. I been using it literally as a paper weight for a book I have been reading. I am knowledgeable in rooting and moding by tinkering with my older phones. I want to know how if at all, is it possible to just get rid of Fire OS for some version of linux. Please help me if you know how thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. Bootloader is locked with no ability to boot or install a custom recovery. Highly unlikely your device can be rooted or downgraded/debloated. You are pretty much 'stuck' with a captive portal to Amazon's ecosystem. However, you can install the Google Play Store and related services for access to additional apps w/o sideloading. Keep in mind the modest hardware specs; this device is designed for content consumption and light entertainment vs any kind of hard core gaming. Not to mention buying stuff from Amazon.
Davey126 said:
Nope. Bootloader is locked with no ability to boot or install a custom recovery. Highly unlikely your device can be rooted or downgraded/debloated. You are pretty much 'stuck' with a captive portal to Amazon's ecosystem. However, you can install the Google Play Store and related services for access to additional apps w/o sideloading. Keep in mind the modest hardware specs; this device is designed for content consumption and light entertainment vs any kind of hard core gaming. Not to mention buying stuff from Amazon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your response. I unfortunately had a feeling this is the exact case. I have found a thread with apk file to get google play on my fire tablet. So that is a thing I suppose. Sucks Amazon made it so that people aren't allowed accessed to do what they want to a device they purchases regardless intent. Wish I know how to code and what not to try to crack it .
Rbohannon89 said:
Thank you for your response. I unfortunately had a feeling this is the exact case. I have found a thread with apk file to get google play on my fire tablet. So that is a thing I suppose. Sucks Amazon made it so that people aren't allowed accessed to do what they want to a device they purchases regardless intent. Wish I know how to code and what not to try to crack it .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I understand the frustration and disappointment it's important to recognize Amazon does not market the device as a generic Android tablet. It is effectively a content consumption portal locked into Amazon's restrictive ecosystem. If marketed for other purposes (and customizable as you wish) it would certainly carry a higher price point. I have often thought Amazon should change the form factor so Fire tablets are not confused with their more general purpose counterparts. It may look like a duck and (sometimes) quack like a duck but it is definitely a turkey if you were expecting a duck.
Davey126 said:
While I understand the frustration and disappointment it's important to recognize Amazon does not market the device as a generic Android tablet. It is effectively a content consumption portal locked into Amazon's restrictive ecosystem. If marketed for other purposes (and customizable as you wish) it would certainly carry a higher price point. I have often thought Amazon should change the form factor so Fire tablets are not confused with their more general purpose counterparts. It may look like a duck and (sometimes) quack like a duck but it is definitely a turkey if you were expecting a duck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said about all I got. I agree they should market differently.

[need advice] after ~10 yrs kitkat and xposed, what are my options on a samsung note8

Hi all,
I have been a Samsung Note User from day one (and Note1). To keep apps in check, I always used xposed plus xprivacy or LBE. Today, I am totally aware my Note4 is totally outdated but I really got used to being able to deny data and (maybe more importantly) network access to any app at will.
I have been keeping to use my old phone because whenever I looked for viable app-fencing solutions on the current android versions, everything seemed very volatile and unstable. Recently my company gave me a Note8 and although I am not a big friend of the modern "glass brick" design trend at all, it is hard to ignore the advances in terms of hardware power and that my trusty old Note begins to be unable to execute certain new apps.
I presume most of you are using current Android versions. So I'd like to ask you which solutions are you using to prevent unwanted data and privacy drain on your devices. I my dreams I would continue to be able to willingly decide whether any app may be allowed to use either Wifi or mobile networks (bonus prize: depending on if the app is in foreground or not), be able to suppress advertising extensions in apps and deny access to privacy-related data like position, unique IDs and contact database.
Which solutions would I use to achieve as many of these goals as possible on Android 7 or even 8? Maybe even some without rooting?
Thank you very much for you suggestions and input..
Much of that is backed right into nougat and Oreo. Many permissions can be denied (depending on the app developers). Root on the newer samsungs seems to be problematic.
Bitmixer said:
Hi all,
I have been a Samsung Note User from day one (and Note1). To keep apps in check, I always used xposed plus xprivacy or LBE. Today, I am totally aware my Note4 is totally outdated but I really got used to being able to deny data and (maybe more importantly) network access to any app at will.
I have been keeping to use my old phone because whenever I looked for viable app-fencing solutions on the current android versions, everything seemed very volatile and unstable. Recently my company gave me a Note8 and although I am not a big friend of the modern "glass brick" design trend at all, it is hard to ignore the advances in terms of hardware power and that my trusty old Note begins to be unable to execute certain new apps.
I presume most of you are using current Android versions. So I'd like to ask you which solutions are you using to prevent unwanted data and privacy drain on your devices. I my dreams I would continue to be able to willingly decide whether any app may be allowed to use either Wifi or mobile networks (bonus prize: depending on if the app is in foreground or not), be able to suppress advertising extensions in apps and deny access to privacy-related data like position, unique IDs and contact database.
Which solutions would I use to achieve as many of these goals as possible on Android 7 or even 8? Maybe even some without rooting?
Thank you very much for you suggestions and input..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! We are together in this! I am exactly the same on my Motorola x play! Been using xprivacy and xposed too for ages on all apps, plus a firewall too.
Give a look at f-droid app store and xposed itself, on the download tab. There is the new xprivacy LUA for android 6/7, and it's the successor of the old version. Haven't tested out yet, but seems to be more or less the same, judging by what I read.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/modules/xprivacylua6-0-android-privacy-manager-t3730663
Also... Give a look at a good firewall, to block rogue internet access for all the nasty apps out there.
Anything just give me a shout. It's good to know I am not alone! [emoji108][emoji56]
Sent from my XT1563 using Tapatalk
madbat99 said:
Much of that is backed right into nougat and Oreo. Many permissions can be denied (depending on the app developers). Root on the newer samsungs seems to be problematic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply, madbat.
I have seen the new permission management in oreo. Please understand that to me it is important that not an app developer decides what I can deny but I want to be able to make that decision myself. Moreover, as far as my knowledge goes, android does not allow to deny network access to apps when I deem they shouldn't have any business on my uplink. Most importantly this applies for any Amazon apps and most apps from their store. All of them are trying to phone home every few minutes(!).
Ev0luti0n_ said:
Hey! We are together in this! I am exactly the same on my Motorola x play! Been using xprivacy and xposed too for ages on all apps, plus a firewall too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had hoped I am not alone
Ev0luti0n_ said:
(...) There is the new xprivacy LUA for android 6/7, and it's the successor of the old version. Haven't tested out yet, but seems to be more or less the same, judging by what I read.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have read about that one and to me it appears like it is not quite there. Last time I looked, the developer was about to REMOVE protection of several sensitive data points like IMEI. Also, like madcat mentioned, rooting the latest Samsung devices can be problematic and I might get some problems bricking a $1000 company device
Ev0luti0n_ said:
Also... Give a look at a good firewall, to block rogue internet access for all the nasty apps out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any recommendations here?
kind regards
Oh... I use afwall, which requires root. I did read here on XDA, that there is a good no root firewall here, but I can't remember the name. ..
Also you won't be able to root the device? I am not sure you are going to have much luck... [emoji848]
Sent from my XT1563 using Tapatalk
Ev0luti0n_ said:
Also you won't be able to root the device? I am not sure you are going to have much luck... [emoji848]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I am able to root it, just a little reluctant yet Like, waiting for someone to finally discover a rooting method that does not invalidate knox for the note8
Hey guys, I have a question. What firewall were you talking about for KitKat?

Categories

Resources