Hi!
So, i found how the 8 cores from the P8 Lite works!
First of all, based on the Cortex-A53 the octa-core 64-bit Kirin 620 processor was made to supports HDR photography, and 1080p HD video encoding and decoding. The chipset also supports ultra-fast LTE Cat4 with downlink speeds up to 150Mbps. The performance can be comparable to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 410.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So, how it works in phone?
I installed the app System2 and stay for a will observing the cpus and is like this, the first block of 4 cores are linked and have for objective the first ground apps, the ones that are running "in first plan", the second block of 4 cores are for background apps and functions like for example installing a app, in the image below i was updating from Google Play you can see the first block of 4 cores almost sleeping and the second block of cores almost at 100.
You can confirm this by the graphics color.
So, like this in a benchmark the scores are from the first block of 4 cores, and the phone release them from the not so important apps and put them in the second block of a 4 cores.
Like this, first block of 4 cores are masters, second block of 4 cores are slaves!
The kernel specifies what each core does.
Will this helps in improvement? I think so, but not a hudge one.
This explains why Benchmark apps give the same scores then a 4 cores CPU, they are only using the first block of 4 cores ...
ExtremeTech said:
Applications like Geekbench have become popular as a way to demonstrate the theoretical performance of smartphone SoCs, but real-world application testing shines a different light on things (Moor Insights also tested camera and chat applications to round out their multi-core evaluation). As things stand, there are some benefits to quad-core devices and virtually no gains from octa-core. In a few cases, moving to more cores actually makes things worse. The overall situation will depend on which applications you use, but the relentless push to add cores is doing end-users no favors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.
We don't have big.LITTLE...
dominj97 said:
We don't have big.LITTLE...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But works in the same way ...
.
persona78 said:
But works in the same way ...
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't get how does it save power or does anything else good for this device processor to work only 4 cores at time, when all 8 cores are similiar to each others. Maybe I read a bit hastly but I only find stuff about how it helps power saving if all cores aren't the same.
keikari said:
I don't get how does it save power or does anything else good for this device processor to work only 4 cores at time, when all 8 cores are similiar to each others. Maybe I read a bit hastly but I only find stuff about how it helps power saving if all cores aren't the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, what is the plan here? Same cores, but only 4 working for power saving? It's something else, I guess.. It's not big.little... And how we can activate all of them...?
That was stated a of times on this forum. The phones uses them all. Use an app like system panel 2. It will show all of them.
I found this to...
ExtremeTech said:
Applications like Geekbench have become popular as a way to demonstrate the theoretical performance of smartphone SoCs, but real-world application testing shines a different light on things (Moor Insights also tested camera and chat applications to round out their multi-core evaluation). As things stand, there are some benefits to quad-core devices and virtually no gains from octa-core. In a few cases, moving to more cores actually makes things worse. The overall situation will depend on which applications you use, but the relentless push to add cores is doing end-users no favors.
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...re-smartphone-isnt-as-fast-as-you-think-it-is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Vinnipinni said:
That was stated a of times on this forum. The phones uses them all. Use an app like system panel 2. It will show all of them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you need to do something to make it show all cores? It's only showing 4 cores online for me.
just my 2p:
Set battery to smart (hope it's the english version), then use asphalt 8 (or other heavy app)
Set battery to performance, then use asphalt 8 (or other heavy app)
You can see a lot of difference.
Set battery to smart (hope it's the english version), check battery percentage, then use as always your phone, after 1 hour check battery percentage again
Set battery to performance, check battery percentage, then use as always your phone, after 1 hour check battery percentage again
Use Antutu and when testing cpu, look at system panel 2 and you will see all the cores working at 100% In this capture is not 100% but I have managed to work at 100%
It has to be a stock rom or it has not changed the kernel, most of the custom rom has a bug in the kernel and the cpu does not work well.
juanche007 said:
Use Antutu and when testing cpu, look at system panel 2 and you will see all the cores working at 100% In this capture is not 100% but I have managed to work at 100%
It has to be a stock rom or it has not changed the kernel, most of the custom rom has a bug in the kernel and the cpu does not work well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I test it with cpu monitor, i run Antutu and nothing happens in the last 4cores...
Check the image below, the high curve is when i was testing with Antutu... The 4 cores bellow are sleeping.
THEY ARE NOT SLEEPING. The most apps are not able to display all cores. Run antutu and try system panel 2. PACperformance is also able to display all cores. There are some others, but most aren't able.
persona78 said:
I test it with cpu monitor, i run Antutu and nothing happens in the last 4cores...
Check the image below, the high curve is when i was testing with Antutu... The 4 cores bellow are sleeping.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plus you can "unlock" the mhz, you can have constant 1200MHz by deleting/renaming something... Kernel Adiutor doesn't really help... I tested this too, and it worked, the only thing is that somehow i'm getting stable 22-25 fps, next runs stable 40 on 3dmark, idk why sometimes I have those low fps-es...
Vinnipinni said:
THEY ARE NOT SLEEPING. The most apps are not able to display all cores. Run antutu and try system panel 2. PACperformance is also able to display all cores. There are some others, but most aren't able.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right and me to!
I installed the app that you use and stay for a will observing the cpus and is like this, the first 4 cores are linked and have for objective the apps that are running "in first plan", the second block are for background apps and functions like installing a app, in the image below i was updating from Google Play you can see the first 4 cores almost sleeping and the second block of cores almost at 100.
You can confirm this by the graphics color.
So, like this in a benchmark the scores are from the first 4 cores, and the phone release them from the not so important apps and put them in the second block of a 4cores.
Like this, first 4 are masters, second 4 are slaves.
.
persona78 said:
You are right and me to!
I installed the app that you use and stay for a will observing the cpus and is like this, the first 4 cores are linked and have for objective the apps that are running "in first plan", the second block are for background apps and functions like installing a app, in the image below i was updating from Google Play you can see the first 4 cores almost sleeping and the second block of cores almost at 100.
You can confirm this by the graphics color.
So, like this in a benchmark the scores are from the first 4 cores, and the phone release them from the not so important apps and put them in the second block of a 4cores.
Like this, first 4 are masters, second 4 are slaves.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are games using all cores, like for ex. minecraft pe, gta sa, mobile legends, rr3 etc.?
Vinnipinni said:
THEY ARE NOT SLEEPING. The most apps are not able to display all cores. Run antutu and try system panel 2. PACperformance is also able to display all cores. There are some others, but most aren't able.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PACPerformance shows wrong info. Or at least shows wrong info for offline cores. Can be tested by turning cores 1-3 off.
D1stRU3T0R said:
Are games using all cores, like for ex. minecraft pe, gta sa, mobile legends, rr3 etc.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im sure it use it, heavy games use many background functions like graphics, and like i read in some Huawei site this cpu is built regarding media functions like filming in 1080p, pictures etc.
.
So, i re-write the main post.
Correct me if im wrong!
.
You should uninstall HWPowerGenie or However it's called. Then all cores will be used the same IIRC
Vinnipinni said:
You should uninstall HWPowerGenie or However it's called. Then all cores will be used the same IIRC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have edited my HwPowerGenieEngine3 app so i know what is inside the app but the app only controls the frequencies on hidle, on perfomance, etc, doens´t control how cpus works.
Code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<cpu_load version="1">
<para modid="0">
<upload>80</upload>
<upchecktimes>2</upchecktimes>
<upcheckspace>1000</upcheckspace>
<upoffset>200000</upoffset>
<maxchecktimes>120</maxchecktimes>
</para>
<para modid="1">
<upload>90</upload>
<upchecktimes>2</upchecktimes>
<upcheckspace>2000</upcheckspace>
<upoffset>200000</upoffset>
<maxchecktimes>250</maxchecktimes>
</para>
<para modid="2">
<upload>90</upload>
<upchecktimes>2</upchecktimes>
<upcheckspace>2000</upcheckspace>
<upoffset>200000</upoffset>
<maxchecktimes>60</maxchecktimes>
</para>
<para modid="3">
<upload>95</upload>
<upchecktimes>3</upchecktimes>
<upcheckspace>2000</upcheckspace>
<upoffset>200000</upoffset>
<maxchecktimes>60</maxchecktimes>
</para>
</cpu_load>
And in pictures you can see the files inside the app.
.
Related
Hello there,
I am just curiuos if there's any way to disable VSync in SGX 540 driver? 3D applications are limited to 56FPS, so Samsung Galaxy S can't win some benchmarks, because of this ridiculous restriction. My SGS always scores about 55.7 FPS or very close to 56, but Droid X has 60 or 62 Hz refresh rate and even though it has weaker GPU (SGX 530) it can still beat SGS in some less demanding benchmarks. The SGS screen refresh rate is 56 Hz... I wish we could unleash the real power of SGX 540, which is now *STRONGLY* limited.
Maybe there are cfg files with options:
VSync=0/1
Or:
MaxRefreshRate 56 Hz etc..
Or something like that... Can somebody look at it?
Thanks in advance for answers!
Best regards,
John
While I'm sure if the framerate was unlocked it would beat every other current Android device in GPU benchmarks, in real-world use this wouldn't mean a thing since the screen itself has a refresh rate of 56Hz...so visually it would be impossible to see any difference other than screen tearing.
It's a limit to save battery, i would like to turn it off/on (for benches) but for real life 56+ fps is just waist of powerbecause of the screen that has 56Hz
(but i prefer 200fps against 60fps on my PC in my 60Hz monitor, somehow i DO notice the difference )
jaapschaap said:
It's a limit to save battery, i would like to turn it off/on (for benches) but for real life 56+ fps is just waist of powerbecause of the screen that has 56Hz
(but i prefer 200fps against 60fps on my PC in my 60Hz monitor, somehow i DO notice the difference )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's called the placebo effect. It's literally impossible for you to see it, you just 'notice' it because you're aware that the framerate is higher, so your mind convinces you that you can see the difference.
AXIS of Reality said:
That's called the placebo effect. It's literally impossible for you to see it, you just 'notice' it because you're aware that the framerate is higher, so your mind convinces you that you can see the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's try not to prove if human eye can see the difference between 56 or 200 FPS. Let's try to find out if there is a possibility to turn the VSync off to see what SGX 540 is capable of. Because it's an external GPU so it has to have any external panel control or cfg file with some options like NVIDIA and ATI GFX cards have.
Damn I wish I could see 80-100 FPS @ Neocore and GL Benchmark score that kicks ass Droid X score (which is better than SGS, because of damn screen refresh rate)... It's really possible!
About fps perception, that is discussed a lot.... dont bring it here.
The tweak -> would be nice, but just for benchmarks (showing them mine is bigger), or playing with charger connected.
This is mobile device, we got limited power resource.
On pc we got sum competitive games, they provide matchup with players around the world, and it means sth to win/lose, so ppl would do anything to do better.. But in singleplayer...on a 'phone'? No matter to me.
xan said:
About fps perception, that is discussed a lot.... dont bring it here.
The tweak -> would be nice, but just for benchmarks (showing them mine is bigger), or playing with charger connected.
This is mobile device, we got limited power resource.
On pc we got sum competitive games, they provide matchup with players around the world, and it means sth to win/lose, so ppl would do anything to do better.. But in singleplayer...on a 'phone'? No matter to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate! It doesn't matter for the power usage if there are 56 FPS or 200 FPS! GPU is doing the same job with the same power usage but is capped by VSync. It's the software (driver level) limitation, not hardware.
Why don't you just find a more graphic-intensive benchmark instead? It's pointless to turn off Vsync even if we could.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
+1 for disable the VSync ....
It`s the reason for the result of GLbenchmark:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So what will you guy accomplish from getting higher scores in a synthetic benchmark which doesn't actually represent real speed?
I wish people would stop putting such an emphasis on synthetic benchmarks...
ed10000 said:
Why don't you just find a more graphic-intensive benchmark instead? It's pointless to turn off Vsync even if we could.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Testing purposes, to see how fast GPU really is and to kick Droid X ass. ;-) We can't say anything about the real performance of SGX 540... But we can see that every 3D test we run on SGS it gets ~56 FPS...
Mate I can ask why do people overclock their CPUs? Why do people overclock their Galaxy S CPU to 1.2 GHz? It's pointless in some way (battery usage, it's hard to see the difference without benchmark scores etc.). But for power users - people just like me - it's something to test the limits of the hardware.
I am going to check the possibility on the PowerVR forum and keep You updated.
The worst thing is that I can cool my PC hardware using liquid nitrogen but I don't really know mobile software to do the trick.
+1 to try and disable vsync! really would like to know what the gpu is really capable of...
amir_rafie said:
+1 for disable the VSync ....
It`s the reason for the result of GLbenchmark:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With tables like this one, for non informed people it may look like Galaxy S is the worst of the current high end devices.
In the /system/build.prop file, there is a line called:
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=55
Change it to 60 and see if the framerates go up? Quadrant reports the Galaxy S screen refresh rate is 68Hz.
changed. quadrant gfx test is same 56fps max.
The config file should be somewhere in the OpenGL driver folder I think. I can't check it out because I am at work at the moment...
fua said:
changed. quadrant gfx test is same 56fps max.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I changed it to 68 and although the quadrant test didnt go about 57fps, I got higher scores. JPC default got around 950 or so, with this I got about 1000.
The UI is definitely smoother though.
hardcore said:
I changed it to 68 and although the quadrant test didnt go about 57fps, I got higher scores. JPC default got around 950 or so, with this I got about 1000.
The UI is definitely smoother though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting!;-) So we can adjust FPS on the UI right now. Looks like it's possible to make scrolling ultra smooth.
nice, please add all of the findings to post 1 , because we could find it easier later..
amir_rafie said:
nice, please add all of the findings to post 1 , because we could find it easier later..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Later. But there are still no idea to walk arount the VSync problem.
I found this thread very useful on the N4 forums, so here it is for the Nexus 5.
First, what is undervolting?
No two CPUs are made equally, every one is slightly different. This means they each need a different minimum voltage to run completely stable, so manufacturers set it high enough so that every chip can run without needing a voltage tailored to that specific chip. But this means that most devices can have their voltages lowered, and still run 100% stable
What are the benefits of undervolting?
In my experience, heat reduction is the main benefit. However, this heat reduction has implications elsewhere; for instance it means the thermal throttling will kick in later, so there is less of a performance drop. Also, less power is wasted to heat, meaning marginal gains in battery life. If you cannot run higher frequencies, i.e. over 2.26GHz, undervolting/overvolting these frequencies may help.
Any disadvantages?
Not really - you may experience reboots and instability, but that means you need to raise the voltages. Also, make sure you don't check set on boot until you know the voltages are stable, but if you have any problems you can flash the stock kernel, or in worst case wipe the data from a recovery.
How do I undervolt?
Many CPU apps are available to change the voltages, but personally I use Trickster Mod (donate). Just slowly decrease your voltages, small amounts at a time, and set them on boot when you are happy they are stable.
If you want to really want to get your voltages perfect, you can set the min/max frequency to one you want to modify, and edit each frequency to perfection. To save time, I'd recommend starting with the highly used frequencies - many apps can tell you which your device uses most often.
CPU Binning
I know on the nexus 4 the cpu bin was related to the amount users could undervolt, and Im sure the case is still the same, so heres how you can find out your CPU bin: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2515593 It would be useful to include your CPU bin in your post.
Here are my initial voltages, running ElementalX v0.7, CPU bin 3 and PSX - please, feel free to share yours (and your knowledge);
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Rules of the thread
Be nice to each other, use search if you have a question, and don't flame noobs for no reason.
It would be helpful to include your CPU bin and kernel in your post.
Also, if I have made any errors in the OP or you feel something should be added, quote this (so I get notified) and tell me, I'm sure theres a lot more information I could include!
Reserved
PVS3 -50 Stable
uh60james said:
What's your CPU bin?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just added to the op, I have a 3, which I think is about in the middle? I haven't had a proper look at the thread yet to find out
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Tom540 said:
I have a 3, which I think is about in the middle?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a 3 too. So far sitting stable at a global -62.5 undervolt the past few days. Tried -75 a few times and got reboots when turning the screen on.
AndrasLOHF said:
I have a 3 too. So far sitting stable at a global -62.5 undervolt the past few days. Tried -75 a few times and got reboots when turning the screen on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same has just happened to me too, so I'll bump them up to -62.5, although I think I should be able to keep the lower CPU clocks at lower voltages as I'm sure the higher ones are used when turning on the screen
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I'm running franco r14 and got two almost immediate reboots on your settings. Gonna go a little easier. I have no experience doing this, so it's still a bit confusing.
can probably go a bit easier on the higher clocks, my settings are -75 mv below 1.8 ghz and -50 above. Just played some deer hunter 2014 and seems to be fine. No reboots so farr! My bin is 3 as well. Running stock rom with faux003b6 kernel
I have a bin of 3 as well. I've only been brave enough to go -37.5 on Fauxs latest beta kernel
Sent from the jaws of my Hammerhead!
Got a CPU bin of 2. I went for -50 undervolt for all frequencies on Faux kernel 002 a few days ago, no reboots so far. Haven't tried -62.5 but -75 was too much, so I'll stick with -50.
I was a little bummed when I found out I had bin 2, but I've been running -75mv no problem for the past few days on bricked kernel
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
You guys are lucky. My phone has bin of 1, could only uv 50mv on high frequency and 75mv on the low end, and I have higher default voltage to begin with.
---------- Post added at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 AM ----------
So far I believe the best app to test UV stability is Antutu Benchmark, I could pass StabilityTest no problem but Antutu always FC when I UV bit too hard.
Spunky_Monkey said:
I was a little bummed when I found out I had bin 2, but I've been running -75mv no problem for the past few days on bricked kernel
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
gd6noob said:
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly the same with me - I think I might be able to set the lower CPU clocks with voltages lower though, I just need a bit more time to test
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I have a PVS 0 and I can undervolt - 100 without any lockups or reboot. Actually the device hasn't rebooted on me once ever. The only problem is it lacks CPU performance but the GPU works fine.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Tom540 said:
Exactly the same with me - I think I might be able to set the lower CPU clocks with voltages lower though, I just need a bit more time to test
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me know what your findings are... im just too lazy to test all the configs..
gd6noob said:
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bin 3 here, I've been running with - 75 since yesterday without problem... Maybe I'll go lower
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk 2
PVS 2 running - 75 volts full speed. Deer hunter runs great so far. Might try - 100 after more testing.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
seems like pvs3 is NOT the best for UVing, its all accross the board, im on PVS2 and i think i can do -75 easily , i think im on -50 accross, using franco kernel r14
It might be helpful if everyone included the actual voltages as well, as some have reported starting with different voltages, and some kernels UV put of the box.
PVS 3, I'm running 712.5 @ 300MHz, and 962.5 @ 2.26GHz; check the screenshot in the OP for all voltages
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Hi everyone, i want to share something that most of u dont know...
Quadrant can be manipulated in order to get higher scores. Just download this and share your scores before and after using this:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.doomlord.quadrantbooster
Whit the hack installed and activated you cant get up to 2k+ to your usual score. Thats why i dont trust Quadrant, just Antutu.
Note: This app doesnt increase your device performance, just manipulate the scores.
The app was developed by DoomLord, is a recognized dev, so dont be scared to try. Needs root.
Have a nice day ^^
edit:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
Samsung Approves your thread!
philipepi said:
Samsung Approves your thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Why would someone want to spoof their benchmarks? So that they matter even less than they already do?
philipepi said:
Samsung Approves your thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung never cheated, merely took the cap off the HW and let it fly. I do not particularly care about benchmarks, but if I did, I'd like to see the absolute HW maximum, cause that's the whole point.
I do check benchmarks of new SoCs though, to get a rought estimate what they can do.
No. They cheated.
BoneXDA said:
Samsung never cheated, merely took the cap off the HW and let it fly. I do not particularly care about benchmarks, but if I did, I'd like to see the absolute HW maximum, cause that's the whole point.
I do check benchmarks of new SoCs though, to get a rought estimate what they can do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they did, letting the device overclocl itself when a benchmark app is open is cheating because you get scores you normally won't have...
philipepi said:
Samsung Approves your thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are a fu##ing legend
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
I'm fairly sure this hack hasn't worked for a long time.. it boosts your I/O scores by putting data in working memory.. would only help if running older hardware
I haven't actually tried it though
failly said:
Yes they did, letting the device overclocl itself when a benchmark app is open is cheating because you get scores you normally won't have...
You are a fu##ing legend
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no such thing as "normal operation", clocks change all the time so our battery doesn't die by 11AM. Some Sammy apps get access to more performance, others hit nowhere near maximum for efficiency, which is why benchmarking doesn't tell the everyday story. It tells developers how far the HW can go, and the Note 3 shows the SD800 raw capabilities better than say the benchmarks of the Nexus 5.
For everyday performance like Chrome, Flipboard etc., use Chrome, Flipboard etc. for testing.
meangreenie said:
I'm fairly sure this hack hasn't worked for a long time.. it boosts your I/O scores by putting data in working memory.. would only help if running older hardware
I haven't actually tried it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah a lot of the reviews on the Play store are saying it actually lowers their overall score
BoneXDA said:
There is no such thing as "normal operation", clocks change all the time so our battery doesn't die by 11AM. Some Sammy apps get access to more performance, others hit nowhere near maximum for efficiency, which is why benchmarking doesn't tell the everyday story. It tells developers how far the HW can go, and the Note 3 shows the SD800 raw capabilities better than say the benchmarks of the Nexus 5.
For everyday performance like Chrome, Flipboard etc., use Chrome, Flipboard etc. for testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IMO, it's like doping.
The athletes(Samsung's phone) can run fast but without this doping(benchmark booster file of Samsung) they run slower.
There indeed isn't such thing as a 'normal clock', but there is such thing as a maximum clock frequency, pushing this frequency means overclocking.
In some way it isn't cheating because overclocking is a known term.
On the other side it makes it cheating since 'normal' that doesn't know sh#t about overclocking, will have their phone getting overclocked without even knowing it.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
meangreenie said:
I'm fairly sure this hack hasn't worked for a long time.. it boosts your I/O scores by putting data in working memory.. would only help if running older hardware
I haven't actually tried it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm is still working, gonna upload some screenshots later.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
AlderCass said:
Why would someone want to spoof their benchmarks? So that they matter even less than they already do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would someone run a benchmark? Because they care about the scores.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
ChavitoArg said:
Why would someone run a benchmark? Because they care about the scores.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To check the performance of their device, and to compare it with others. To check performance differences before and after flashing roms etc. But definitely not so that they can lie about how powerful their device is, when it really isn't.
ChavitoArg said:
Why would someone run a benchmark? Because they care about the scores.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they care about the scores, why would they intentionally use an app to make those scores completely inaccurate?
AlderCass said:
If they care about the scores, why would they intentionally use an app to make those scores completely inaccurate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont take me wrong.
There is people that care about the score just to show off, because of it the app exist and because of this there is people using and rating the app. I wanted to show that quadrant doesnt show real performance, it can easily be manipulated.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 mediante Tapatalk
confirmed, it does work on 4.4.2 using motox dalvik
but it's fairly obvious if you have used it lol.. on my nexus 5 I got 15000 plus io score
BoneXDA said:
There is no such thing as "normal operation", clocks change all the time so our battery doesn't die by 11AM. Some Sammy apps get access to more performance, others hit nowhere near maximum for efficiency, which is why benchmarking doesn't tell the everyday story. It tells developers how far the HW can go, and the Note 3 shows the SD800 raw capabilities better than say the benchmarks of the Nexus 5.
For everyday performance like Chrome, Flipboard etc., use Chrome, Flipboard etc. for testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes there is such a thing as normal operation.
They cheated. They were the only ones that overclocked the gpu for any apps on its white list. Nothing else could ever use that gpu clock period. It detected a app and gave the system a higher clock than the device would otherwise be able to hit. It's pure cheating.
They also basically turned off the thermal throttle. Another pure cheat.
They aren't doing this for developers. What a crock. They're doing it to cheat and inflate benchmark scores so their devices look better on a chart or in some clueless YouTube reviewers video.
The app just puts everything to max frequency. Not much of a hack..
albundy2010 said:
Yes there is such a thing as normal operation.
They cheated. They were the only ones that overclocked the gpu for any apps on its white list. Nothing else could ever use that gpu clock period. It detected a app and gave the system a higher clock than the device would otherwise be able to hit. It's pure cheating.
They also basically turned off the thermal throttle. Another pure cheat.
They aren't doing this for developers. What a crock. They're doing it to cheat and inflate benchmark scores so their devices look better on a chart or in some clueless YouTube reviewers video.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Supercars are speed capped for street use, and you know you'll never run them at full speed; yet watching a car show I bet you wanna see them pushed to the limit, don't ya?
The point you are missing is that if Samsung can make the Note 3 blow the roof over your head, then you can too if you are a talented developer, otherwise why even bother with benchmarks, you don't need such power for your everyday apps. Quite the contrary: Samsung & others cheat every other app setting lower clock policies for longer battery life. Now tell me how many happy Note users are complaining that their alarm clock or live wallpaper doesn't run at full clock?
If they don't, why do you?
I am running RR and am getting under 40k with antutu benchmark
i am wondering why it is so low and if someone can help me.
i am running xposed with the following modules
amplify - not blocking anything though yet
app settings - used for a couple apps that need 640 dpi to operate since i am running at 480 dpi
blacklist
boot manager
google offline voice
greenify
iFont
unbelovedhosts
xinstaller
xprivacy - not blocking anything with it yet
youtube adaway
is there any apps that would cause such a low performance. i tried installing the kernel by @BayButcher and modifying it to his battery suggestions and i am about to try his performance setup for his kernel to see if that does anything. but i was getting near 50k with stock so i figure i should be better with CM12.1 or RR.
johnbravado said:
I am running RR and am getting under 40k with antutu benchmark
i am wondering why it is so low and if someone can help me.
i was getting near 50k with stock so i figure i should be better with CM12.1 or RR.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In thermal settings, you will have to set the temperature higher. Intellithermal aggressively throttles the CPU. I set it for 65 degrees for just "normal" operations, because it seems to start throttling 10 degrees sooner than what you set.
So for a benchmark that makes you feel better, set the degree limit even higher. How high is however high you are willing to risk... Also, before you take the benchmark tests, stick the phone in the freezer with a ziplock bag for a few minutes to let it really cool down. Then start the test, put it back in the freezer while the test is running. The phone will run faster longer while cool, and won't throttle the CPU.
I mean, benchmarks are for bragging rights, yes?
When you finish the benchmarks test, then put the degree limit back down to like 65 degrees for everyday use.
______
50,000 -- here's Antutu results at 65 degrees throttling and freezer trick. I could get higher if I set my thermal setting even higher -- which would be safe temporarily as long as I chilled the phone first IN the freezer and kept it there during testing.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ChazzMatt said:
In thermal settings, you will have to set the temperature higher. Intellithermal aggressively throttles the CPU. I set it for 65 degrees for just "normal" operations, because it seems to start throttling 10 degrees sooner than what you set.
So for a benchmark that makes you feel better, set the degree limit even higher. How high is however high you are willing to risk... Also, before you take the benchmark tests, stick the phone in the freezer with a ziplock bag for a few minutes to let it really cool down. Then start the test, put it back in the freezer while the test is running. The phone will run faster longer while cool, and won't throttle the CPU.
I mean, benchmarks are for bragging rights, yes?
When you finish the benchmarks test, then put the degree limit back down to like 65 degrees for everyday use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree benchmarks are for bragging, but they are still a benchmark. if stock out of the box i can get a 48-49k benchmark and i do some mods and can get a 55k benchmark that is for bragging. but if it drops to 40k something is broke. . I am going to try the increased temperature and run another test. the performance setup only got me to 41k.
i am really confused now. i reinstalled computerfreeks ROM which before bootloader unlock gave me 50k and now it gave me 35k. i am going back to RR because I like it more but need to find out what caused performance issues.
johnbravado said:
I agree benchmarks are for bragging, but they are still a benchmark. if stock out of the box i can get a 48-49k benchmark and i do some mods and can get a 55k benchmark that is for bragging. but if it drops to 40k something is broke. . I am going to try the increased temperature and run another test. the performance setup only got me to 41k.
i am really confused now. i reinstalled computerfreeks ROM which before bootloader unlock gave me 50k and now it gave me 35k. i am going back to RR because I like it more but need to find out what caused performance issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My main point is while the custom ROM may give you increased performance and options, the default kernel thermal throttling points (for frequency as well as for core -- two separate settings) may be sabotaging benchmark tests.
I increased frequency point to 65 degrees, because that REALLY means 55 degrees, for some reason.
I didn't even touch the "core" thermal setting...
And my 50,000 result was on stock 640 dpi.
Cm12 is the same way. Low benchmark. I'm saying with exposed and stock
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
tecsironman said:
Cm12 is the same way. Low benchmark. I'm saying with exposed and stock
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on CM, but with @baybutcher27 kernel. See my benchmark results above.
ChazzMatt said:
I'm on CM, but with @baybutcher27 kernel. See my benchmark results above.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but you obtained those results by tweaking the phone and subjecting it to non-real world conditions. I can get 52K on the stock rom by doing absolutely nothing and having a bunch of xposed modules active, and I think that's the issue that the OP is concerned about. The relationship between benchmark scores and real world performance is debatable, but I think he has a valid point.
johnbravado said:
I agree benchmarks are for bragging, but they are still a benchmark. if stock out of the box i can get a 48-49k benchmark and i do some mods and can get a 55k benchmark that is for bragging. but if it drops to 40k something is broke. . I am going to try the increased temperature and run another test. the performance setup only got me to 41k.
i am really confused now. i reinstalled computerfreeks ROM which before bootloader unlock gave me 50k and now it gave me 35k. i am going back to RR because I like it more but need to find out what caused performance issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The caused of the performance issues is simple heat vs battery level.
Has the device get hot it get low score because more throttle down, has the battery gets low same ting there is a setting to lock the clock under a frequency if the battery get too low, it starts only at 20%.
very simple table:
Code:
thresholds 80 85 90
thresholds_clr 79 84 89
actions cpu cpu cpu
action_info 2265600 1958400 1728000
this is editable this is in the file
system/etc/thermal-engine-quark.conf
I never try to edit it but you can.
But in my test I find that there is more then this file make the performance get low, and for me is just the battery as it get low the performance get too, but the battery is only responsible for some very little % of this the heat is 90 to 95% responsible.
So be aware that you problem is more heat you heat your device installing ROM make and restore backup don't give time to the device cools down and test.
No matter the ROM you try that will be the result, unless you can set the temp threshold higher like in a custom Kernel.
baybutcher27 said:
The caused of the performance issues is simple heat vs battery level.
Has the device get hot it get low score because more throttle down, has the battery gets low same ting there is a setting to lock the clock under a frequency if the battery get too low, it starts only at 20%.
very simple table:
Code:
thresholds 80 85 90
thresholds_clr 79 84 89
actions cpu cpu cpu
action_info 2265600 1958400 1728000
this is editable this is in the file
system/etc/thermal-engine-quark.conf
I never try to edit it but you can.
But in my test I find that there is more then this file make the performance get low, and for me is just the battery as it get low the performance get too, but the battery is only responsible for some very little % of this the heat is 90 to 95% responsible.
So be aware that you problem is more heat you heat your device installing ROM make and restore backup don't give time to the device cools down and test.
No matter the ROM you try that will be the result, unless you can set the temp threshold higher like in a custom Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am willing to buy into the heat issue since i am changing between ROMS and such so i got a few things against me
1) chargin phone
2) restoring different ROM
3) not giving adequate time to cool
i am going to let eveything settle a little with RR and retest. i am using your kernel and used your performance recomendations. i am not a gamer i just do not like clicking a button and waiting. or wa5tching me type faster than the phone can output to a field
TheSt33v said:
Yeah, but you obtained those results by tweaking the phone and subjecting it to non-real world conditions. I can get 52K on the stock rom by doing absolutely nothing and having a bunch of xposed modules active, and I think that's the issue that the OP is concerned about. The relationship between benchmark scores and real world performance is debatable, but I think he has a valid point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes exactly. i did nothing between test a and test b except unlock bootloader and install RR, CM12.1. and yet i got a huge performance drop. but same issue was with the computerfreek version which is like stock. so i am thinking it has to do with something else not playing friendly.
i would assume if with stock out the box i could pull 50k then with RR and a kernel boost i should be able to pull 52k.
TheSt33v said:
Yeah, but you obtained those results by tweaking the phone and subjecting it to non-real world conditions. I can get 52K on the stock rom by doing absolutely nothing and having a bunch of xposed modules active, and I think that's the issue that the OP is concerned about. The relationship between benchmark scores and real world performance is debatable, but I think he has a valid point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tweaking the phone? Mostly all I did was change the CUSTOM kernel throttling conditions. When you root your phone, from that point on you are TWEAKING your phone. Give me a break.
Yeah, I also cooled the phone, so that is non-real world conditions, but changing the quite arbitrary throttling point is quite logical when it's been PROVEN that throttling point affects performance and actually starts throttling even sooner!
Read this.
xxspookyxx said:
I think change gorvenor to conservative dont solve the problem.
To me dont make any difference, the better Gorvernor works well with my Moto maxx are Interactive_pro.
To getter better performance of my phone, i need change Thermal Frequency Throttle to 80º C, most custom roms use Intellithermal method, and they are very sensivity to temperature.
If you choose 80º C, they will reach in max 70º to begin the throttle the processor.
Stock Custom Roms are 60ºC in Thermal Frequency Throttle, i change to 80ºC and my phone are very fast now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, on your custom ROM kernel, change your governor, change your throttle points.
OK i am satisfied here. i unplugged the phone and benchmarked at 50.7k. apparently charging the phone cripples its productivity. i did not think it would cripple it that bad. and if this is a known thing i apologize for the posting.
i can now go back to enjoying the awesome RR and tweaking it.
ChazzMatt said:
I'm on CM, but with @baybutcher27 kernel. See my benchmark results above.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes sir I saw that.. Maybe I'll give cm12 another shot with butchers kernel. I'm at work ATM with just my otg and little time.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
My Turbo that I haven't bootloader unlocked. All stock with some stuff disabled in settings.
ChazzMatt said:
Tweaking the phone? Mostly all I did was change the CUSTOM kernel throttling conditions. When you root your phone, from that point on you are TWEAKING your phone. Give me a break.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, okay, so all you did was change some throttling conditions. But you know what I had to do in order to get a higher benchmark than the one you got? Nothing. At room temperature. That's a problem. One of the main purposes of unlocking one's phone is increasing performance, not reducing it.
If the problem is simply an incorrectly set throttle point, all you should have to do to get 52K at room temperature is change the throttle point high enough, right? No cooling required. So let's see that. If you can get 52K without melting your phone in a normal usage environment, then good. No worries. Mine didn't even get hot during the benchmark, so you should be able to easily exceed my 52K score. If not, there is an issue that I think should be addressed.
---------- Post added at 09:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 PM ----------
johnbravado said:
OK i am satisfied here. i unplugged the phone and benchmarked at 50.7k. apparently charging the phone cripples its productivity. i did not think it would cripple it that bad. and if this is a known thing i apologize for the posting.
i can now go back to enjoying the awesome RR and tweaking it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Charging = heat generation = throttling, so yes, that would do it. I'm still curious to see if CM and this custom kernel can break 52K though. I'm waiting for CM13 before I make the switch, but I might reconsider if I have to sacrifice some performance. The technical power of this phone was half the reason I bought it.
Stock cm12.1 benched 48,000 screen on.
Screen off it was 43,000.
I'm happy with it. I also think the battery life is mildly better.
Sent from my DROID Turbo using XDA Free mobile app
ChazzMatt said:
Tweaking the phone? Mostly all I did was change the CUSTOM kernel throttling conditions. When you root your phone, from that point on you are TWEAKING your phone. Give me a break.
Yeah, I also cooled the phone, so that is non-real world conditions, but changing the quite arbitrary throttling point is quite logical when it's been PROVEN that throttling point affects performance and actually starts throttling even sooner!
Read this.
So, on your custom ROM kernel, change your governor, change your throttle points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I just flash butchers kernel and not mess with it? Is it good to go after flash or will I have to play around with settings?
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
After you flash it there is nothing saying you need to change anything.
I would imagine he has the presets at what he thinks is best.
Sent from my DROID Turbo using XDA Free mobile app
Just FYI, I'm running computerfreek's latest unlocked ROM with xposed and about 10 modules. No changes to thermal setting (don't know the default for this ROM either), and just have it sitting on the desk. I'm also, getting unbelievable battery life with servicely, amplify.
tecsironman said:
Can I just flash butchers kernel and not mess with it? Is it good to go after flash or will I have to play around with settings?
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-maxx/development/kernel-bhb27-kernel-t3207526
the writer of the kernel has said it needs some adjustments since he does not turn them on by default. but he gives 2 setups, 1 for battery and 1 for performance on post #2. i just set it up as per post #2 until i understand more what is going on with the kernel.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Master of Speed (Click)
The T800 travels from the FUTURE to bring YOU the POWER AND BATTERY of a Galaxy S10+ to your beloved S7, while fighting obsolescence...
Version III features:
° 8 hours of battery life sustained with Aosp
9 hours of SOT
° About twice or more the speed with no Lag por shutter
° Vídeo about how to apply UV properly and recommended ROM and kernel and many extras (Such as GPU Turbo and FPS screen uncap) All of that in only 8 hours! And for free!!
This revolutionary CREATION of mine will give you the SAME optimization as Apple do with it's phones (Tremendous battery life and smoothness) But with two or three times the amount of ram, better screens twice the cores, battery ,etc. So:
HERE IS THE AWESOME SPEED YOU CAN SPECT:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6kolVhdtl3M&feature=youtu.be
AND HERE IS A BENCHMARK WHERE YOU CAN SEE TEMPERATURES OF 20 OR MORE DEGREES LESS THAN STOCK ROM, WHILE SAVING BATTERY
https://youtu.be/9DOjie9QFb4
"65% of charge in 30 minutes full charge achieved in less than a hour..." With Aosp only
Q: Why does the manufactures do this bad on stock on purpose?
Two things, MARKETING and PROGRAMMED OBSOLESCENCE which lead them to even put 10 core when a Apple device with two high power cores (Iphone 7 plus) eats it (Mediatek 10 core setup)
Q: What kind of results will i experiment?
With LATEST LINEAGE 16 + Morokernel + this AWESOME PROFILE and with a non-degraded battery you will experience the performance of a Samsung Galaxy S10 with the battery life (and also charging speed, if you have a QC 3.0 charger... of the Latest huawei/honor phones (8 hours SOT, 65% in 30 min) feeling the ui completely lag free, the apps opens right at the moment, and scrolling is like butter. Also runs very very well like a SD 855
So i upload you the profile, you will need the following:
Morokernel installed
Mtweaks latest
Download the latest LAG_TERMINATOR™
Open Mtweaks menu and select "profiles" then import the latest "LAG_TERMINATOR™" profile of mine.
APPLY THIS SETTINGS ON BOOT AND YOU ARE DONE. Vídeo settings:
https://youtu.be/CYIRS8nc0Lc
You have to apply this settings on Mtweaks to Morokernel and you are Done. You can also flash the attached zip's to uncap 60fps in all the system animations and GPU turbo for more gaming/phone normal use performance.
1Morokernel and mtweaks download (all in 1 flashable zip) (Works on aosp and TW roms) https://androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=295574
2DOWNLOAD NOW THIS AWESOMENESS:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/k964wlh4c4qz5ol/LAG_TERMINATOR™.json ***SEE THE ABOVE YOUTUBE VIDEO AND APPLY THE SAME SETTINGS AND LATTER YOU WILL ENJOY THIS.[/COLOR][/U]
Disclaimer: You don't have the right to post my content in any site without my explicit permission.
Note: If you want me to buy some toys/good sweets to my dear cat you can always donate some money to my paypal: http://paypal.me/DonateLAGTERMINATOR Thank you
------------
Hi! touching my phone and having common sense let me know that the Exynos GPU and the low power cores/high power cores have a little nonsense regarding to STOCK thermal and CPU/GPU freq/usage, so, i change between low power cores to high power cores at 50% it's minimum frequences and let the system to use ONLY the high power cores, heavy underclocked, since our phone have thermal copper plate to avoid high temperatures there should be no problem.
But the MORE INTERESTING part of it, it's that this Exynos allows to underclock a LOT among other things, except the GPU which doesn't go really well with underclocking so, when i do this mod, i was able to boost the overall system performance (daily use) like our S7 Exynos is like two or three generations after it regarding to performance! While turning on only hardcore CPU's and not the EIGHT OF THEM the phone not only runs wayyy better, but also runs VERY stable and cold, even better than stock.
Regarding battery life, the overall pack which you only have to import through "Morotweaks" you not only have a lot more benefits regarding low power consumption, but, when you use the powerfull cores ONLY at higher frequency, the Exynos is able to deep sleep more often than before... Regarding additional benefits into the battery life/heat area.
Any chance to have this profile running on thunderstorm kernel?
Thank you for sharing your work!
Thanks! Testing!
What about Reflux Kernel?
Therazorsedge said:
Hi! touching my phone and having common sense let me know that the Exynos GPU and the low power cores/high power cores have a little nonsense regarding to STOCK thermal and CPU/GPU freq/usage, so, i change between low power cores to high power cores at 50% it's minimum frequences and let the system to use ONLY the high power cores, heavy underclocked, since our phone have thermal copper plate to avoid high temperatures there should be no problem.
But the MORE INTERESTING part of it, it's that this Exynos allows to underclock a LOT among other things, except the GPU which doesn't go really well with underclocking so, when i do this mod, i was able to boost the overall system performance (daily use) like our S7 Exynos is like two or three generations after it regarding to performance! While turning on only hardcore CPU's and not the EIGHT OF THEM the phone not only runs wayyy better, but also runs VERY stable and cold, even better than stock.
Regarding battery life, the overall pack which you only have to import through "Morotweaks" you not only have a lot more benefits regarding low power consumption, but, when you use the powerfull cores ONLY at higher frequency, the Exynos is able to deep sleep more often than before... Regarding additional benefits into the battery life/heat area.
So i upload you the profile, you will need the following:
Morokernel installed
Mtweaks latest
Download the latest LAG_TERMINATOR™ zip
You have to go through the menu and select "profiles" then import the latest "LAG_TERMINATOR™" zip profile of mine.
You will experiment like you have a S10 instead of a S7 and you will be able to save a lot of battery and heat.
I recommend you the rom AOSIP but you can use every Aosp/Tw rom out there, even with other kernel compatible with Mtweaks/Thundertweaks but i recomend only this rom. Enjoy it.
DOWNLOAD NOW THIS AWESOMENESS:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/k964wlh4c4qz5ol/LAG_TERMINATOR™.json
Disclaimer: You don't have the right to post my content in any site without my explicit permission.
Note: If you want me to buy some toys/good sweets to my dear cat you can always donate some money to my paypal: [email protected] Thank you, Miau!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my phone is flying now, thank u so much
not compatible with stock kernel, am i right ?
I see minimum CPU clock of big cores is locked to 1664 MHz. So no low clocks = high battery drain....
It's compatible with lineage 16 and MoRoKernel-AllInOne-CSC4-v7.0.1?
danyel980 said:
It's compatible with lineage 16 and MoRoKernel-AllInOne-CSC4-v7.0.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
Ubimo said:
I see minimum CPU clock of big cores is locked to 1664 MHz. So no low clocks = high battery drain....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The magic of this is explained on the first post video. My S7 now feels like a ****ing S10 with better battery
Also try the latest Lineage OS!!! My friend.
You will sabe a lot of heat and battery
Ubimo said:
I see minimum CPU clock of big cores is locked to 1664 MHz. So no low clocks = high battery drain....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
danyel980 said:
It's compatible with lineage 16 and MoRoKernel-AllInOne-CSC4-v7.0.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can run it in EVERY KERNEL AND EVERY ROM that supports UNDERVOLTING, and you'll THEN EXPERIMENT IF YOU DO IT'S TREMENDOUS INCREASES ON BATTERY LIFE AND POWER like your phone is a galaxy S10 (but with better battery)...
I.m.Tuga said:
Any chance to have this profile running on thunderstorm kernel?
Thank you for sharing your work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are wellcome, you can donate through paypal so i buy new toys to my cat
You can allways in any moment tell us here your FANTASTIC RESULTS with LAG_TERMINATOR™ Profile of mine
Hesperus01 said:
What about Reflux Kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should work, you can try and tell us here the difference, if it uses UV you'll be fine. Also your battery speed charge level increases, tell us
Works great, feels very smooth but it feels very hot too! I´ve undervolt -75mw in CPU , -50mw in GPU and -56,25 in MIF-INT-DISP-CAM, what more can i do?
kienzi said:
my phone is flying now, thank u so much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i'm glad to see i'm helping others with this revolutionary arrangement, keep in tune for more updates!
Ubimo said:
I see minimum CPU clock of big cores is locked to 1664 MHz. So no low clocks = high battery drain....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to read the full post and try it for yourself to see this incredible and AWESOME RESULTS!!!
JuanMat97 said:
Works great, feels very smooth but it feels very hot too! I´ve undervolt -75mw in CPU , -50mw in GPU and -56,25 in MIF-INT-DISP-CAM, what more can i do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You only have to view the first post youtube config video, and make you s7 literally fly colder than before
There seems to be a problem with Mtweaks, so you have to copy the values by hand, pretty easy actually
Also i recommend you try latest lineage 16 for the BEST RESULTS.
Therazorsedge said:
You only have to view the first post youtube config video, and make you s7 literally fly colder than before
There seems to be a problem with Mtweaks, so you have to copy the values by hand, pretty easy actually
Also i recommend you try latest lineage 16 for the BEST RESULTS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for best results I think I'll wait next release cuz with bug fixes on camera hal
I installed profile, and manually edit voltages like in the video but my phone heats, on charger even more
Hello! I was excited when I found your creation, but on my hyper rom v3 with Thunderstorm kernel, the most of the values don't seem to be the same as yours (like the video you've posted).
I can relate that my S7 doesn't heat so hard while charging, but it charges slower (which is not a bad thing). Also Spectrum profiles have reduced to 2 profiles, sometimes 3 (if I toggle them fast - balanced, "battery" and Gaming), instead of 4. I tried to record my screen to show you, but I got lots of freezes lasting 5 to 10 seconds . Do I need to move to AOSP in order to get the right tweaks, or could you please rearange values for Thunderstorm kernel?