Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Lenovo Vibe X3 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Here's actually one of its saving features, there are barely any camera right now on smartphones with high pixel density such as 21mp.
The camera is very good in a well lit environment, giving you very clear photos and rivaling a point and shoot cheap digital camera.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the BLU R1 HD come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the BLU R1 HD come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Back camera color is good enough, but photos can appear grainy. Front camera is similar.
Honestly, it's quite poor. If you care about camera quality this isn't the phone for you. If you need a good camera your going to have to pay for something more expensive.
The new Moto G is supposed to have a better camera
Good enough for me, but I'm not a photo guru, the pictures are adequate enough in decent light.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei P8lite come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I state that I'm not a photography expert but in my opinion, 3.5 stars would be the best vote to give, to be precise 4 because it makes good photos being a medium-low range, 3 because in general it is not the best. In light conditions the photos are taken decently (sometimes you notice a bit of noise) and the HDR works well even if not always. Indoor photos are mediocre. In other words more lightthere is, better is the image quality.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LeEco Le 2 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The 16mp shooter does a great job in outdoor light.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy J5 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Good Photo quality.....as a my opinion?
the color reproduction and dynamic range of the phone's camera are preety decent(on a well-lit environment) and the focus is slow but it gets the job done. also i use other manual camera apps than the stock since stock only have limited options to choose fron
Photos is great when there is enough sunlight, however the colors seems to be a bit over-saturated :angel:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the BlackBerry KEYone come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
don't get fooled by the camera sensor coming from a google pixel. there's a night and day difference between the both.
picture quality is decent. i assume it'll remain that way for a while.