Adhell 3 Update - Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Questions & Answers

Just downloaded the latest version as needed to update my license key also, but the new key I just generated is not working in the new version, it is asking for a ELM key, I have a KLM like I've always used, which isn't working, adhell gives error 201 when I try to use it. Anyone know what's going on? Do I need a new type of key? I see no options on SEAP to make anything other than the key I have..

See for link to edu key
https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3/blob/master/README.md
And more info, last two pages
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-9/help/adhell-3-1-assistance-t3873831/page23

Thanks I figured it out already, never got notification of your reply which would have been helpful haha. But I'm sorted now anyway. Thanks again though ?

Please keep in mind that AdHell3 is NOT supported on XDA. For official and up-to-date information about the AdHell3 project, please visit:
Main repo: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3
Scripts for compiling: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3-scripts
Get your EDU ELM key from: https://seap.samsung.com/license-keys/generate/edu
Official Support Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/hfreZum
Dependable(?) precompiled APKs: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/sb37c6gmhqgbn

Mike B. said:
Please keep in mind that AdHell3 is NOT supported on XDA. For official and up-to-date information about the AdHell3 project, please visit:
Main repo: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3
Scripts for compiling: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3-scripts
Get your EDU ELM key from: https://seap.samsung.com/license-keys/generate/edu
Official Support Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/hfreZum
Dependable(?) precompiled APKs: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/sb37c6gmhqgbn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is it not supported?

Not supported as in official and up-to-date information about the AdHell3 project is on the links listed

Snowby123 said:
Why is it not supported?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because XDA doesn't provide a convenient way to host and support ongoing source code projects, and there are only 3 of us and only 24 hours per day!
Various XDA threads erroneously deal with AdHell3 as if it were a simple "download and install" app when it's actually a GitLab project which must be compiled by a Samsung Developer. It is not (and cannot legally) be distributed as a precompiled APK, and any such APK that you may find is the sole responsibility of its uploader (and hosting site), in violation of Samsung's policies. Improper distribution of earlier AdHell, AdHell2, and SABS led to those apps getting discontinued at Samsung's request. Furthermore, those APKs must be "patched" to be usable, possibly in violation of XDA's policies.
The AdHell3 project is alive and well, and fully supported in the venues mentioned in my previous post, including READMEs, FAQ, etc. See you there...
UPDATE:
Samsung is not currently issuing any keys suitable for use with AdHell3. Please see our official support areas or at least check out THIS post

Related

******ROM POSTING******

The following are reasonable formats that are suggested when posting a new ROM. We expect your ROM post to look somewhat professional and easy to understand.
1. Requirements (bootloader version, radio version etc)
2. State that it's from an official manufacturer or source base (stock ROM or AOSP-like source).
3. Thread shows a clear overview of changes made, in a way that users can see what has changed.
4. Explicit installation instructions.
5. ROMs need to identify what kernel they are using. If 100% stock then they must state that.
6. If custom kernel they must provide a link to the kernel on XDA (if available) or a link to the kernel source. This is required by GPL. Stock (untouched) kernels can link to the manufacturers source (if available).
7. At least 2-4 images (screen-shots) 1 of which must be of system/device info. Do not use photo hosts thay deluge users with ads and popups when they select the image. You can either attach the images, or use a hosting service such as photo-bucket for example.
8. Links to downloads. A link to a direct download is preferred. Linking to external websites home pages are not allowed, it must be linked to the Downloads page. Also use of "ad-driven" (adfly for example) or "commercial" sites are mostly not allowed. Registration on some sites "may" be allowed, but is subject to XDA Moderation approval.
9. Credits for sources used. Very important.
10. Keep your "asking for donations to a limit. You already have a "Donate" button.
Simply posting a link to some download site "here it is, download it", is not allowed.
Any questions, please feel free to contact any moderator.
Thank You
Moderation Team

***** READ Before Posting your Work*****

The following are reasonable formats that are suggested when posting a new ROM. We expect your ROM post to look somewhat professional and easy to understand.
1. Requirements (bootloader version, radio version etc)
2. State that it's from an official manufacturer or source base (stock ROM or AOSP-like source).
3. Thread shows a clear overview of changes made, in a way that users can see what has changed.
4. Explicit installation instructions.
5. ROMs need to identify what kernel they are using. If 100% stock then they must state that.
6. If custom kernel they must provide a link to the kernel on XDA (if available) or a link to the kernel source. This is required by GPL. Stock (untouched) kernels can link to the manufacturers source (if available).
7. At least 2-4 images (screen-shots) 1 of which must be of system/device info. Do not use photo hosts thay deluge users with ads and popups when they select the image. You can either attach the images, or use a hosting service such as photo-bucket for example.
8. Links to downloads. A link to a direct download is preferred. Linking to external websites home pages are not allowed, it must be linked to the Downloads page. Also use of "ad-driven" (adfly for example) or "commercial" sites are mostly not allowed. Registration on some sites "may" be allowed, but is subject to XDA Moderation approval.
9. Credits for sources used. Very important.
10. Keep your "asking for donations to a limit. You already have a "Donate" button.
Simply posting a link to some download site "here it is, download it", is not allowed.
Any questions, please feel free to contact any moderator.
Thank You
Moderation Team

questions about xposed framework

I have to know a couple of things about xposed.
is this a open source or not?
what kind of risk can you get from using this especially concerning privacy.
I would imagine wrt privacy.... It could compromise everything as modules have access to just about everything. Most popular modules are open source, and the source for the framework itself is posted on github and linked to from the read only thread.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/xposed-faq-issues-t2735540
scryan said:
I would imagine wrt privacy.... It could compromise everything as modules have access to just about everything. Most popular modules are open source, and the source for the framework itself is posted on github and linked to from the read only thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so in theory it's safe just as long as you use open source modules.
and framework isn't doesn't have security risk because it's open source
Syncing accounts issue
After installing Adaway for YouTube and Bootmanager if I try to sync my Google account or any account, it will not sync. Is this a known issue or am I missing something?
Just because it's open source it doesn't mean it's safe, it means you can audit it's source code. It doesn't mean you won't have vulnerabilities that can be exploited just because "someone will read it's source code". Even libraries that are used across all internet have problems, like http://www.openssh.com/security.html.
Somewhat related, that's why I'm asking here http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/jars-xposedinstaller-t3300963 about the nature of some jars, some zips and such in the source code.

[ROM][March 2018]CottonmouthOS [8.1.0] [OPM1.171019.021.2018]

CottonmouthOS
A security and privacy focused mobile operating system based on CopperheadOS that is MicroG friendly.​
Code:
DISCLAIMER: NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR BROKEN PHONES OR LIVES
This ROM is based on the great CopperheadOS ROM with signature spoofing enabled to allow MicroG framework. There will be changes to make the signature spoofing spoof ONLY the Google service signatures and ONLY usable/allowable by MicroG services ONLY. The new name CottonmouthOS is a way to distinguish from CopperheadOS builds, because of the signature spoofing patches.
Prerequisites coming from other ROMs :-
Have latest March factory image installed.
Instructions :-
Download the CottonmouthOS ROM
Follow the install guide
Have a more private and secure phone
Features :-
Features of CopperheadOS ROM
Note :-
CottonmouthOS is meant to be used with the bootloader locked with NO custom recovery installed and no GAPPS.
Credits :-
CopperheadOS team
Mar-V-in for MicroG
razorloves for inspiration
References :-
Copperhead homepage
Documentation
Instructions used to build
Sources
MicroG patch
If anyone wants to reupload to a better file hosting site please do.
OLD OP
CopperheadOS
A security and privacy focused mobile operating system compatible with Android apps​
Code:
DISCLAIMER: NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR BROKEN PHONES OR LIVES
CopperheadOS - a hardened FOSS operating system based on the Android mobile platform. Its based on Android Open Source Project with added privacy and security features.
Prerequisites :-
Have latest factory image installed
Instructions :-
Download the UNOFFICIAL CopperheadOS ROM
- Mirror 1
- Mirror 2
- Mirror 3
Follow the install guide
Have a more private and secure phone
Features :-
Protection from zero-days
Prevents many vulnerabilities and makes exploits harder
Hardened C standard library and compiler toolchain
Catches memory corruption and integer overflows
Hardened kernel
Kernel self-protection and high quality ASLR
Stronger sandboxing and isolation for apps & services
Stricter SELinux policies, seccomp-bpf and more
Backported security features and quicker patching
Benefiting from upstream changes long before stock
Firewall & network hardening
Along with improvements like MAC randomization
Open-source and free of proprietary services
Uses alternatives to Google apps/services like F-Droid
Security-centric user experience changes
Better defaults, finer-grained permission control
Note :-
Copperhead is meant to be used with the bootloader locked with NO custom recovery installed and no GAPPS.
Credits :-
CopperheadOS team and razorloves for inspiration.
References :-
Copperhead homepage
Documentation
Instructions used to build
Last Updated 2018-02-28
Does copperhead have the pixel navbar animation?
File not yet uploaded
ChongoDroid said:
File not yet uploaded
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
ChongoDroid said:
File not yet uploaded
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is strange. Will reupload.
EDIT: Done see OP
I've always wondered something, since COS charges money for phone flashing and the only way to get it yourself is to compile it yourself and flash. Once you flash your self compiled build, do you have to build the updates or does the built in updater work?
ChongoDroid said:
I've always wondered something, since COS charges money for phone flashing and the only way to get it yourself is to compile it yourself and flash. Once you flash your self compiled build, do you have to build the updates or does the built in updater work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't see the updater, and even if it was there the keys would not match so you would not be able to update.
Ideally, we would put this on a build server and release the full install and OTA every time there was an update so we would get the updates within a few hours of official. A few changes could be made to either change the updater (if it is there, which I did not see it) or use lineageOS one and modify it to point to the release server.
jahrule said:
I didn't see the updater, and even if it was there the keys would not match so you would not be able to update.
Ideally, we would put this on a build server and release the full install and OTA every time there was an update so we would get the updates within a few hours of official. A few changes could be made to either change the updater (if it is there, which I did not see it) or use lineageOS one and modify it to point to the release server.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah CopperheadOS uses the stock recovery iirc. They do it like this to use verified boot iirc. I personally loved COS on my Nexus 5 and missed it on my pixel.
how likely are weekly builds for this rom? also did you find a workaround for the F-Droid extension? I tried manually removing it and disabling it via twrp, but it seems to restore itself or simply refuse to delete, showing as deleted from within twrp
Thank you for building this, I tried and failed miserably. Will flash it today :good:
Fdroid Keys and BuildSystem
Thanks for building.
Please add your keys to the fdroid whitelist.
Could you write/post about your build system?(Like a Howto)?
KShion619 said:
how likely are weekly builds for this rom? also did you find a workaround for the F-Droid extension? I tried manually removing it and disabling it via twrp, but it seems to restore itself or simply refuse to delete, showing as deleted from within twrp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The fdroid extension needs the keys as I pointed out in the 2nd or 3rd post notes. Regular builds would require a build server but a build server costs money. So, will try to update when I can.
smilingtux said:
Thanks for building.
Please add your keys to the fdroid whitelist.
Could you write/post about your build system?(Like a Howto)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please see the build instructions in the op that I posted.
Ideally, I would like to make another rom that has the restricted sigspoof added so we could have an option for microg
jahrule said:
The fdroid extension needs the keys as I pointed out in the 2nd or 3rd post notes. Regular builds would require a build server but a build server costs money. So, will try to update when I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meant like a user-doable way until the keys updated, I'm fine with the full screen dialog for now
KShion619 said:
Meant like a user-doable way until the keys updated, I'm fine with the full screen dialog for now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The keys are compiled in so, no.
jahrule said:
Please see the build instructions in the op that I posted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have seen and read it before
I setup an build host based on copperheads documentation, I read about the java whitelisting of my keys for fdroid, but the build process itself fails from time to time.
So my question was more about, how did you manage to setup a reliable environment for building. What OS did you use, installed dependencies etc.
smilingtux said:
I have seen and read it before
I setup an build host based on copperheads documentation, I read about the java whitelisting of my keys for fdroid, but the build process itself fails from time to time.
So my question was more about, how did you manage to setup a reliable environment for building. What OS did you use, installed dependencies etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You seem to ask for a docker.

[KERNEL][ANDROID 13][OSS] HunterKernel

Kernel version 4.14.190.
Kernel for Kali Nethunter with support many drivers.
Tested only in Android 13 Pixel Experience.
I dont know if that kernel work on stock rom.
Installation in twrp, just flash zip and dont forget to make backup boot partition.
Support KernelSU.
Source:
GitHub - Lsc0x80/android_kernel_samsung_sm6150: fork rtd1250/android_kernel_samsung_sm6150
fork rtd1250/android_kernel_samsung_sm6150. Contribute to Lsc0x80/android_kernel_samsung_sm6150 development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
my channel:
Hunter-Kernel
Owner: @lsc0x
t.me
Download:
latest - Google Drive
drive.google.com
Hello @Lsc0x80
Please publish the source you used to build this kernel immediately, as required by the XDA GPL Policy.
Additionally, using XDA to promote your Telegram channel is prohibited, per the XDA Telegram Policy. All support and updates for this project must be provided in this thread. Please read the Telegram Policy and edit your post accordingly.
If you do not correct this within 5 days, this project will be taken down.
V0latyle said:
Hello @Lsc0x80
Please publish the source you used to build this kernel immediately, as required by the XDA GPL Policy.
Additionally, using XDA to promote your Telegram channel is prohibited, per the XDA Telegram Policy. All support and updates for this project must be provided in this thread. Please read the Telegram Policy and edit your post accordingly.
If you do not correct this within 5 days, this project will be taken down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have corrected
Lsc0x80 said:
I have corrected
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you

Categories

Resources