Related
Hey my geek friends.
I come from Denmark and i go to a "high school" there.
I just got assignment about the smartphone market in USA and I am suppose to write like 20 pages. And I want your help.
It goes like this;
Explain the U.S. market for smartphones and selected corporate competitive strategy.
Analyze the competitive situation in the U.S. market for smartphones and include in your analysis a characteristic of the U.S. smartphone consumer.
Evaluate the success criteria can be set for companies in this market.
Good articles, ideas, another made assignments, websites, really anything.
Hope you will help me.
I know this isn't a helpful answer, but I will give you the general idea.
US carriers SUCK, decent service and phone selection, but SUCK when it comes to other things such as customer service generally, locking down their stuff, and pricing.
Care to explain?
Sent from my LT18i
I remember those days of this type of school work.
Here is one quick recent article that might help you:
itproportal.com/2011/12/15/apple-google-duopoly-us-smartphone-market-iphone-android-command-82/ Goo luck!
I'll take a shot at a basic overview...
From the most basic marketing point of view I would say that most all carriers market too 3 groups:
1. Individuals concerned mostly with style and functionality that have little or no tech smarts.
2. Individuals that put tech and functionally concerns ahead of style (these would tend to be power users)
3. Families
From these three major groups the carriers develope their "calling plans" with personal and business users something of a subset in there somewhere.
The manufactures on the other hand from what I've seen market exclusively to tech savvy power users which means their advertising there latest and greatest devices.
And then of course there is the whole Iphone vs Android thing...lol
And of course I could be totally wrong about all the above as I'm just bored and randomly checking out threads...
Sent via Tapatalk on my CM7'ed DX2
My approach to your questions:
I'll give some of my own opinions on your questions that might help spur some ideas; from an economics student's point of view.
You might consider touching on how a new phone comes out every other week, for all the carriers and how that affects competitive markets. There's saturation in the smart phone market. Though the demand for smart phones continue to rise continuously year to year. As smart phones become more popular, manufacturers are supplying more of the product. What may loom in the competitive market is bargains in the future. In fact a recent article I read about Huawei Ascend D quad XL says the company claims to have the "fastest smart phone upcoming" and that it will be at only 30-50% of current market prices. If that's true be on the lookout for a price-drop in the smart phone market.
People have different priorities when they select a smart phone, thus there is no one phone that’s best for everyone, the market must take into account the consumer criteria when selecting a smart phone such as, hardware design and features, brand names, network technology like 4G, the OS and interface, the carrier, and cost. If you were to analyze success for the market you should look at one of the basic rules of economics in the US, supply demand. Modeled by what the suppliers are making and the market is wanting. This will determine all the ideal factors that criteria when producing smart phones will create. Success will be analyzed by which market best meets the criteria. Also take into account that most of the smart phones in the US are not US made, or at least from a US company, that will be a large portion of an analysis on US gross on smart phones in a competitive market.
The article was from Android Authority on the Huawei Ascend D quad XL.
Source: Economics student.
I think it would be interesting to include comparison os iPhone vs. Blackberry in some areas like:
- young people
- big corporation
and also which smartphone are the carriers subsidising more.
I would talk about the subsidies that people in the US get on their devices and how it distorts peoples view on the value of their devices. Also I would suggest you to talk about how the US uses different frequencies for their network as well as GSM and CDMA networks and how phones are not only network locked but won't work (or you need to do a lot) to get them to work on other carriers
Another resource
You may find this site to be a meaningful resource for your research. I would suggest to start with this article "2011-customers-view-of-smart-phones" on Amplified Analytics blog
I see they too privilegiate India market, ok India means big sales, but please do not at the expense to make feel non India users as second class citizen in Xiaomi's ecosystem.
There are things that should not ever happened:
1 discriminate features as QC4 when is a thing they can enable worldwide at no expense.
2 Pie update, when it initially seemed a progressive rollout, now seems another "India exclusive" Grace.
I do not have nothing about Indians they're my friends, but I feel this strategy from Xiaomi it's simply unfortunate and at large will have a cost for Xiaomi.
If there are people from Xiaomi here please provide us your version on this history.
because India is xiaomi biggest market after china
I dunno if Xiaomi is doing anything that other makers do. Samsung and LG devices I have had over the years always had staggered rollouts. I have waited weeks for updates to hit my Pixel from Google too.
I have no idea why quick charge would be enabled in some markets and not others. It's a trademarked technology so I would believe that they would have to pay Qualcomm to use/license the trademark and tech.
I bought this as a budget device and my expectations are as such. That said, my expectations have been exceeded for the most part as the experience has been similar to devices that have costed me much more. I suggested you look to another manufacturer, but I think you will find similar issues elsewhere.
chriskwarren said:
I dunno if Xiaomi is doing anything that other makers do. Samsung and LG devices I have had over the years always had staggered rollouts. I have waited weeks for updates to hit my Pixel from Google too.
I have no idea why quick charge would be enabled in some markets and not others. It's a trademarked technology so I would believe that they would have to pay Qualcomm to use/license the trademark and tech.
I bought this as a budget device and my expectations are as such. That said, my expectations have been exceeded for the most part as the experience has been similar to devices that have costed me much more. I suggested you look to another manufacturer, but I think you will find similar issues elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pixel updates are always global, as long I know Qualcomm do not charge to enable features in their soc.
Samsung updates use to be smooth progressive, only carrier customized devices delay, and actually they global rom are the first to update and market specific the latest, 180 degree approach from Xiaomi's global last.
Motorola has similar approach to Xiaomi but they start with they smallest markets as policy to avoid damage spread in case some inadverted bug, it's Clever, but Xiaomi's IMHO it's just bad advertising, India people do not eat discrimination, they want good timely service but not to feel sorry for that.
Most likely they want to check if there will be problems, so they push the update only for India, their biggest market, and two small countries in EU, Netherlands and Belgium.
They will wait a few days for customers feedback, and if there is no problems, they will push the OTA update all over the world.
This is how I see it, it doesn't mean that this is what is happening.
minnuss said:
Most likely they want to check if there will be problems, so they push the update only for India, their biggest market, and two small countries in EU, Netherlands and Belgium.
They will wait a few days for customers feedback, and if there is no problems, they will push the OTA update all over the world.
This is how I see it, it doesn't mean that this is what is happening.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense for Netherlands and Belgium, quite small markets, but if they just want to re-check for problems, why they start with their's most sensitive market?
As you said, if they started only with belgium and netherlands, and then follow biggers markets to end with India and China, I'll say Ok, that's the way motorola does (and others), conservative, not funny but justified. this is the opposite of non-sense.
AcostaJA said:
I see they too privilegiate India market, ok India means big sales, but please do not at the expense to make feel non India users as second class citizen in Xiaomi's ecosystem.
There are things that should not ever happened:
1 discriminate features as QC4 when is a thing they can enable worldwide at no expense.
2 Pie update, when it initially seemed a progressive rollout, now seems another "India exclusive" Grace.
I do not have nothing about Indians they're my friends, but I feel this strategy from Xiaomi it's simply unfortunate and at large will have a cost for Xiaomi.
If there are people from Xiaomi here please provide us your version on this history.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They just rolled out the update to the global variant of MI A2. Some user of XDA from Hong Kong reported having recieved it.
I can't believe people are so angry that India is getting the Pie update first. I personally have zero problems with India beta testing the Pie update for the rest of us.
The level of teenage drama and temper tantrums here is incredible. To the OP, are you seriously asking the "Xiaomi" people who may visit this website to explain why they love India and "hate" the rest of us? Really?
Do you think you will personally be able to guilt Xiaomi into explaining why India is getting the Pie update first?
pgkane said:
I can't believe people are so angry that India is getting the Pie update first. I personally have zero problems with India beta testing the Pie update for the rest of us.
The level of teenage drama and temper tantrums here is incredible. To the OP, are you seriously asking the "Xiaomi" people who may visit this website to explain why they love India and "hate" the rest of us? Really?
Do you think you will personally be able to guilt Xiaomi into explaining why India is getting the Pie update first?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no complaints on Indian, neither I think they are actually "lucky", my complaint are on Xiaomi's immature tricks to approach the Indian market at the expense to allow non sense discrimination, I've meet Indian people and IMHO are the among the less discriminative in the world (despite few exceptions, all populations have exceptions).
Would be good some Xiaomi's official to explain their approach to India (I feel it's dumb), given they don't care to have a public change log about updates, chance to see here (even at Xiaomi's forum) an official apology are close to Zero, these are things to expect from Samsung, not Xiaomi.
Sent from my Xiaomi Mi A2 using XDA Labs
I rather wait for a stable update than get it among the first and full of bugs. Anywhore, people are confirming the slow read write bug on pie, so if this and the budget pixel phone are true, I'm preparing my jetpack and going bye bye.
AcostaJA said:
I have no complaints on Indian, neither I think they are actually "lucky", my complaint are on Xiaomi's immature tricks to approach the Indian market at the expense to allow non sense discrimination, I've meet Indian people and IMHO are the among the less discriminative in the world (despite few exceptions, all populations have exceptions).
Would be good some Xiaomi's official to explain their approach to India (I feel it's dumb), given they don't care to have a public change log about updates, chance to see here (even at Xiaomi's forum) an official apology are close to Zero, these are things to expect from Samsung, not Xiaomi.
Sent from my Xiaomi Mi A2 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is "discrimination" even a factor here? You're not getting your PIE update when you want it so you're gonna stomp your feet and claim discrimination?
Xiaomi doesn't owe you a thing. They are a company trying to deploy a major update to our OS in a manner that doesn't piss off people like you. I'm sure if you received your update today and it didn't work as you wanted it to, you be stomping your feet saying "Xiaomi hates me because they released this piece of crap update and didn't test it first!! Off with their heads!!"
Talk about immature tricks....you're whole post is an immature trick to get an major phone manufacture to answer to you....it's laughable.
pgkane said:
How is "discrimination" even a factor here? You're not getting your PIE update when you want it so you're gonna stomp your feet and claim discrimination?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is not only updates, its also QC4, in general Xiaomi is using these "special graces" as marketing tool, which is not good.
pgkane said:
Xiaomi doesn't owe you a thing. They are a company trying to deploy a major update to our OS in a manner that doesn't piss off people like you. I'm sure if you received your update today and it didn't work as you wanted it to, you be stomping your feet saying "Xiaomi hates me because they released this piece of crap update and didn't test it first!! Off with their heads!!"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I'm a Xiaomi customer I put money buying their devices, I deserve timely, fair non-discriminatory treatment, privilege updates to some Market following marketing guidelines instead technical reason is unfair.
pgkane said:
Talk about immature tricks....you're whole post is an immature trick to get an major phone manufacture to answer to you....it's laughable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't need to attack me, it you think all this post is immature, what do you care of?
AcostaJA said:
The problem is not only updates, its also QC4, in general Xiaomi is using these "special graces" as marketing tool, which is not good.
Sorrÿ, I'm a Xiaomi customer I put money buying their devices, I deserve timely, fair non-discriminatory treatment, privilege updates to some Market following marketing guidelines instead technical reason is unfair.
You don't need to attack me, it you think all this post is immature, what do you care of?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you not received all monthly security patches on time? I've noticed I get my security patches long before the "major" manufacturers deploy their security patches. And Pie was released a week ago on the Mi A2. Generally speaking, every smartphone manufacturer (perhaps with the exception of Google) uses a phased deployment approach to updating phones so not everyone is impacted by a potential issue that may crop up. So you say Xiaomi is treating you unfairly because you don't have the update a week after releasing it to India? Since I doubt they are going to change their behavior based on your posts here in this forum, I think you have two options to get updates as soon as they're released...either become a beta tester, or move to India.
And I'm not attacking you. Sorry if it feels that way. Just calling out a temper tantrum for what it is.
Not to mention, it hasn't even been a week, its been four days.
AcostaJA said:
The problem is not only updates, its also QC4, in general Xiaomi is using these "special graces" as marketing tool, which is not good.
Sorry, I'm a Xiaomi customer I put money buying their devices, I deserve timely, fair non-discriminatory treatment, privilege updates to some Market following marketing guidelines instead technical reason is unfair.
You don't need to attack me, it you think all this post is immature, what do you care of?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You aren't even qualified to complain. As far as I know you live in the US, where xiaomi never officially launched this device. They could have totally blocked any updates for people like you. I have had an lg phone (Unlocked US Carrier version), and they only release OTA for people with their sim card. So if anyone was to complain you'd be at the end of the line.
ubc said:
You aren't even qualified to complain. As far as I know you live in the US, where xiaomi never officially launched this device. They could have totally blocked any updates for people like you. I have had an lg phone (Unlocked US Carrier version), and they only release OTA for people with their sim card. So if anyone was to complain you'd be at the end of the line.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not In the US, Xiaomi sell a Global Unlocked phone, it means I can travel with it wherever I want, take a minute a visit Xiaomi's AliExpress global store.
Carrier locked devices are another question.
Sent from my Xiaomi Mi A2 using XDA Labs
There are too many impatient people on MI A2 XDA Forum.
anshmiester78900 said:
There are too many impatient people on MI A2 XDA Forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not just being impatient, it's also the question about QC4, the logic about updates is a progressive rollout starting with a random pick of smaller but representative markets and then progressively include bigger markets, this is how Samsung HTC Motorola does. This mess it's just an unfortunate advertising tactic, as the Indian as first batch are more susceptible to receive a buggy update (as seem is the case as looks like the rollout was suspended).
Then you have the QC4, Indian A2 are 1:1 global AS same hardware, QC4 is blocked to global A2 by software, neither Xiaomi need to pay Qualcomm license as (as far I've searched) is included with the SOC procurement (as was with apt-x hd later enabled -wich many morons claimed not included to lower costs-.
I love the A2, but Xiaomi still has a long way to walk to reach the global phone maker status they pursuit, current marketing tactics drag they in the opposite direction
Sent from my Xiaomi Mi A2 using XDA Labs
qc4 is a must in India, they got special bricks with A1 also since the electric grid is unstable ... i'm not sure if qc3 or qc4 matters anywhere else ... chillax mate, your throttle will resolve nothing, long life is rare. If you have a little experience in electronics, you'd know that no current above 2A (@5Vdc) is healthy for the battery. Unless ou want to cry in the same fashon in 6 months after purchase that the battery doesn't keep the charge even for a day.
QC4 is a healthier QC3 indeed .
Sent from my Xiaomi Mi A2 using XDA Labs
I'm sure it isn't news to most of you that Huawei and ZTE have been systematically attacked by the United States for a couple of years now. Carriers in the U.S. do not carry Huawei phones, and in the past couple of weeks alone things have been escalated on all fronts. Huawei stock has all but crashed, the victim of serious market manipulation by everyone that the U.S. is forcing to play along with their charade. They are even trying to force other countries to ban hardware from both these companies. Last week, the U.S. bullied Canadian authourities into arresting the CFO of Huawei, who is of course the daughter of the CEO. Needless to say, China is not happy about it - and have made some fairly ugly threats on diplomatic channels since.
There are a few aspects to this, first of all the insistence by U.S. intelligence services that both Huawei and ZTE are 'spying' for the Chinese government. If there exists one iota of proof showing this, they haven't come out with it. In other words, they are claiming that these companies have the 'capability' to spy, which is of course a nonsensical statement because the same could be said for ANY device capable of networking made by ANY company in the past 30 years. If phones or routers or switches or dedicated backbone mainframes WERE spying, any privacy/hacking group would have already come out with obvious evidence of such. I won't even go into the irony of the American government complaining about spying on civilians... The thing that makes this truly laughable is that approximately 80% of all hardware handling Internet traffic already in place was made by these two companies. It is rumoured that the reason for this hysterical attack on these companies, especially Huawei, is that the NSA has not been able to crack their encryption - and that these companies have refused to give the NSA backdoor access. Again, the irony is so rich it hurts.
The U.S. has unilaterally imposed sanctions on Iran, sanctions that have been repeatedly overturned and veto'd by all of the other members of the U.N. council. As such these sanctions do not carry any weight in the international system at large. As an example other countries are merrily continuing to trade with Iran, and the United States cannot legally do anything about it. Their excuse for flat out kidnapping the daughter of the CEO of Huawei (on the same day that Trump sat and had dinner with Xi in Beunos Aires) was the claim that Huawei was doing business with Iran through a shell company. They are accusing her of a crime, based on sanctions that are illegal. A crime that she didn't commit in Canada, or Iran, or China, or Mexico, or in any other country she has been to. Canadian extradition treaties with the United States mean that what the United States did was 'legal' as far as ordering Canadian police to apprehend her - except for the fact that technically she never left the airport, which by law is considered international territory that is legally bound by the laws of specific parts of the airport. For example, a good sized chunk of the Vancouver airport is considered American ground - in the same way that an embassy is. You cross a checkpoint, within which you are bound to the laws of the United States and there are U.S. military forces there in fatigues and carrying AR-15's. She, of course, did not enter this area. In fact she legally didn't even enter Canadian territory.
This is all part of a bigger trade war, one that could potentially get very ugly - very quickly. In the week since her abduction (I won't call it an arrest), Canadian authourities have stalled on having a bail hearing for her. Of course the Americans are demanding that she be denied bail, for obvious reasons. Meanwhile the citizens of Canada (like me) are outraged by this disgusting abuse of American thuggery, and by the simpering cowardice of our buffoon of a leader Justin Trudeau - who in typical idiot fashion happily gushed about how he was warned in advance of this 'arrest'. Let's be clear here. China has blatantly broken international law when it comes to patents and legal intellectual property as a matter of course through the history of technological development. This is how they operate. No one will argue that they caused the crash of several major tech-communications companies here in Canada, including Nortel and arguably Blackberry (although they were a victim of their own shortsightness as well, but hey they really stuck to that physical keyboard to the very end). No one is going to say that China has a great record when it comes to human rights, and they certainly aren't afraid to disappear their own people in a heartbeat - even from foreign countries. That said, it could very easily be argued that the United States has done more harm in our world than China by orders of magnitude - but that is another discussion entirely.
<Insert 20 page rant here about how Bush and Obama sold 500,000 production jobs to China and the American public happily allowed Borgmart to spread across the country like a Cancer>
Anyway, back to the topic of... well, my topic (if that is even possible). Things are heating up BIG TIME - by the day. China announced today that they have banned the sales of all iphones in large parts of the country. They have recalled diplomats, and are very close to expelling Canadian diplomats. The CEO of Huawei isn't just another Billionaire playboy, he is very chummy with the highest members of the ruling party. The Americans knew fully well what message they were sending when they snatched his daughter out of the Vancouver airport. The question is, how far will this go? What lengths will the Americans go to in order to shut Huawei down? Could they lean on Google to the point where Google services disable themselves on Huawei devices? Could they actually force countries like Canada to ban Huawei devices from using tele-communication networks? Let's step back for a moment, to just a couple of months ago. Keep in mind that both Huawei and ZTE phones are allowed to be used by the highest level of government in the U.K., in France, and in Germany. Do you really think that if there was any proof of any kind that these phones were uploading data, that these governments wouldn't have joined the United States in 'banning' them? Here in Canada, Huawei is the prime sponsor to 'Hockey Night in Canada'. What will happen if the Americans take things to the next level, and our phones start little by little becoming unusable? Can we honestly expect Huawei to expend a lot of effort to keep our firmware updated here in the West given the nonsense that is going on?
It is laughable to try and point fingers at these companies for the 'potential to spy' when we are being wrung dry for every bit of personal information possible by Google, Facebook, Apple, etc. Every piece of tech we own is made in China. This situation is getting scary though, and personally I cringe to say it but owning a brand new Huawei phone may be a losing proposition. We have dared to support a company that isn't entirely under the boot of the American petro-dollar Deep State MIC. Is this all just high stakes posturing between superpowers, or the final chess moves in a grand game played by the darkest of Puppeteers?
(don't get me started)
In India too about 95% sentiments are Anti-chinese goods coz they are claiming land belonging to India and that they are encouraging other neighbouring nations (you know which one) for border bullying and other stuffs (you know what).
But, nonetheless, the top market in India is OnePlus and Xiaomi. Technology at affordable cost will win irrespective of where it is coming from.
Irony will prevail, market will not fall only stock will and market shocks are short spanned. Bad days for Huawei but they will come out of it.
Businessmen and politicians never give up on anything
Pretty sure they can't ban certain phones from working, they work on spectrums which are universal across the carriers. I.E There is no way to determine the manufacture of a phone by the phone signal.
They could ban you from importing them though.
Luckily the UK where I live are being a bit more sensible about it and working with the company to iron out any security concerns. The main issue is with 5G, which I've heard Huawei are miles ahead of the competition.
You, sir, have some amazing vocabs and writing ability. Knowing how Huawei and China government works, I wouldn't be to worry about Huawei intentionally slowly down their devices in the western countries. I did make an acquaintance of a Huawei top brass a few years back. Don't be too worry about your device not receiving anymore updates.
The banning of apple phones in China was spurred by qualcomm. Both US companies sueing the crap out of each other in China. It is almost laughable.
Also I doubt Google will disable their services on Huawei devices. Firstly, Google is trying to re-enter the Chinese Market. Secondly, China phone producers would not lose a thing. They already have their own application stores and cloud drives made for the Chinese people. The whole ecosystem is there, with or without Google.
Really like your views and speculations. Cheers.
Phil750123 said:
Pretty sure they can't ban certain phones from working, they work on spectrums which are universal across the carriers. I.E There is no way to determine the manufacture of a phone by the phone signal.
They could ban you from importing them though.
Luckily the UK where I live are being a bit more sensible about it and working with the company to iron out any security concerns. The main issue is with 5G, which I've heard Huawei are miles ahead of the competition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not saying they would, but it is certainly possible to ban/blacklist imei's TAC and technically carriers could band together and create agreed upon blacklists for phones. I'm also guessing here that if a government wanted to ban certain vendors, then they could mandate that their carriers (carriers are obliged in most country's to operate under government authority) not allow IMEI TAC ranges. I'm commenting purely under technical merit, not legal.
I don't agree with sanctions against Iran but the US is free to pass sanctions agains Iran and the fact that other countries don't pass similar sanctions doesn't render them illegal. What the US government is claiming is that Huawei used shell companies with accounts at US banks and mislead those banks about the fact that the companies were engaged in trade activities that are illegal in the United States.
This might be a comolete political farce orchestrated by a US President that is beneath contempt but that doesn't mean you have a clue what you are talking about when you try to make arguments about what is legal and illegal.
I don't think there is any real possibility of Google being forced to remove its services from Huawei devices sold outside of China. Google has too much to lose as an international company to not vigorously fight any kind of law Trump might try to pass. Trump started his trade war with China to distract his supporters from the investigation into his ties with Putin and Russia and the day after Trump leaves office the trade war with China will be over. It has no support beyond the officials that are scrambling to keep Trump in office.
Phil750123 said:
Pretty sure they can't ban certain phones from working, they work on spectrums which are universal across the carriers. I.E There is no way to determine the manufacture of a phone by the phone signal.
They could ban you from importing them though.
Luckily the UK where I live are being a bit more sensible about it and working with the company to iron out any security concerns. The main issue is with 5G, which I've heard Huawei are miles ahead of the competition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
However they can determine the manufacturer using the Imei.........
panman1964 said:
However they can determine the manufacturer using the Imei.........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Manufacturer AND phone model actually.
giz02 said:
Manufacturer AND phone model actually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed.
Sidebar (and going slightly off topic):
Have you considered modifying your signature so it doesn't take up so much space (eg look at mine)?
I love your take on this whole fiasco
panman1964 said:
Indeed.
Sidebar (and going slightly off topic):
Have you considered modifying your signature so it doesn't take up so much space (eg look at mine)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is your signature?
The concern about whether it is wise for US government employees to use Huawei phones because of the potential they could be used to spy on communications pre-dates Trump.
Those concerns never extended to consumers using Huawei phones and have nothing to do with Trump's China trade war or attacks on Huawei. This is just Trump being Trump. He is a moron, a bully, a liar and a crook and being president doesn't change any of that.
AT&T and Best Buy dropping the Mate 10 Pro was simply an act of cowardice and had nothing to do with US Law. The Mate 10 Pro was still sold on the shelf at Walmart, Sears, K-Mart and other stores in the United States and also directly from Amazon (unlike newer Huawei phones that are only available on Amazon through third party sellers).
Huawei phones were never illegal in the United States. Huawei chose to stay out of the US market after the Mate 10 Pro because it isn't worth the time, money or trouble at the present time.
The charges against the Huawei executive in Canada have nothing to do with Huawei phones.
ZTE Phones are no longer being attacked by the White House because they reportedly paid a hefty bribe to Trump in the form of subsidies for a resort he plans to build in Asia.
ZTE phones were never banned for use on US carriers. No phone brand has ever been banned for use on US networks or by US carriers.
You don't seem to understand the difference between the loud political posturing of Trump and actual law which are very different things.
Also, anyone who believes Juliane Assange at this point is gullible at best because Assange has obvious ties to Russian intelligence and acted as their outlet when they were trying to manipulate the presidential election on behalf of Trump.
I find it sad that some people here actually take the OP post seriously.
The only thing Trump did was sign a bill banning government and military purchases of a host of Chinese hardware. I'm sorry CNN promised you that Cankles would win. Huawei is the only communications company that makes their own chips, and as such they are enemy #1 to the alphabet agencies in the States - because they want to be the only ones spying on American citizens. The pressure on carriers and major outlets like Best Buy to drop their phones was because Huawei was going to stomp Samsung and Apple out of the entry level phone market, and then the high end phone market. It just isn't acceptable that Billionaires in China would make money on the backs of slave labour in Asia, instead of Billionaires in the United States making that money on the backs of slave labour - while not paying a nickel of tax. And yeah, perfectly normal for the CEO's daughter to be abducted out of an international airport in Canada based on.... sanctions against Iran that the U.N. Judiciary Council has unilaterally denounced how many times now? Just a coincidence that Huawei stock crashed from direct manipulation by western financial systems after China threatened a total ban on iPhones in China?
It doesn't matter *why* Huawei is being attacked from all sides. The fact is, they most certainly are. The laughable part to all this? They are under suspicion of 'spying' because their founder was a former member of the Chinese military. Uhhh.... ALL Chinese companies can be considered to be 'State controlled', and as far as 'potential spying', again you can say the same for any electronic equipment with networking capability that has ever been made in China. There has never been one iota of proof that Huawei or ZTE has uploaded one single packet of information back to President Xi's intelligence apparatus. Isn't it a little late for all this posturing, regardless? Aren't these two companies responsible for 80% of all the Internet hardware on the planet?
I'm concerned about this, because it doesn't look like we are going to get an unlocked bootloader - which puts us at the mercy of a fragile support for a fringe carrier phone here in North America. If the pressure on Huawei continues, I can see them slowly withdrawing from the Western market entirely. If this was a $400 phone, I wouldn't be too worried about the longevity of support.
Trump declares 'national emergency' to make way for Huawei ban (updated)
https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/15/president-trump-national-emergency-for-telecom-networks/
President Trump today declared a national emergency, which could set up a huge blow to China's Huawei.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-national-emergency-china-huawei-2019-5
What I'm wondering about is whether this may affect Xiaomi phones too. Don't want to not be able to use my phone obviously.
BCE111 said:
Trump declares 'national emergency' to make way for Huawei ban (updated)
https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/15/president-trump-national-emergency-for-telecom-networks/
President Trump today declared a national emergency, which could set up a huge blow to China's Huawei.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-national-emergency-china-huawei-2019-5
What I'm wondering about is whether this may affect Xiaomi phones too. Don't want to not be able to use my phone obviously.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are going to ban Chinese phones so that google/apple can own you all.
Don't bring politics into this forum, especially his name
Face palm.......
Huawei has the power to crush Apple and if the deal went through a couple years ago, people found out how good their phones really were, it'd only be a matter of time.
I can see why the US Govt intervened from a business interest perspective (Apple being one of the largest US companies).
As for spying, how can we all sit there and forget what Edward Snowden said about ALL phone carriers spying at the National Security level and beyond?
How many years was that before Trump's Administration existed again?
And didn't Google just get in trouble for violating antitrust laws last week in India
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...-antitrust-concerns-eu-fine-investigation-cci
right after being fined 1.7 billion for violating antitrust laws by the EU?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.w...lated-european-antitrust-laws/?outputType=amp
Two points:
1) IMHO this thread isn't really "political," as the Democrats in Congress have basically echoed what Trump is saying about Huawei.
2) The US government's issue with Huawei (to the best of my understanding) is that Huawei may be using its switches and other carrier-level and municipal-level equipment to engage in widespread spying on American public and government communications. Xiaomi, on the other hand, only sells smartphones to the US market, which isn't even its focus at the moment. So it's hard to see Uncle Sam getting all worked up over Xiaomi.
RaiderDuck said:
Two points:
1) IMHO this thread isn't really "political," as the Democrats in Congress have basically echoed what Trump is saying about Huawei.
2) The US government's issue with Huawei (to the best of my understanding) is that Huawei may be using its switches and other carrier-level and municipal-level equipment to engage in widespread spying on American public and government communications. Xiaomi, on the other hand, only sells smartphones to the US market, which isn't even its focus at the moment. So it's hard to see Uncle Sam getting all worked up over Xiaomi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, it's not political. And point #2 sounds right. You never know these days though with some of the irrational moves coming out of Washington. I think too some of the decision on Huawei may have also been based on their competition with Apple and Google who are big US political donors and lobbyists. And I was wondering too if Xiaomi's decision not to release the Redmi Note 7 Pro in the US, but also other markets other than India and China, was taken with this type thing in mind. Maybe they were spooked by the Huawei ban. But maybe, as they said, it was just a product development strategy.
tiguy99 said:
Face palm.......
Huawei has the power to crush Apple and if the deal went through a couple years ago, people found out how good their phones really were, it'd only be a matter of time.
I can see why the US Govt intervened from a business interest perspective (Apple being one of the largest US companies).
As for spying, how can we all sit there and forget what Edward Snowden said about ALL phone carriers spying at the National Security level and beyond?
How many years was that before Trump's Administration existed again?
And didn't Google just get in trouble for violating antitrust laws last week in India
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...-antitrust-concerns-eu-fine-investigation-cci
right after being fined 1.7 billion for violating antitrust laws by the EU?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.w...lated-european-antitrust-laws/?outputType=amp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are all really good points.
Verge and every other media outlet is reporting google has suspended business with Huawei. So no more android updates, on current phones google apps will get updated but Huawei cannot use android on future phones. I think it is about time they let us unlock the bootloader. Thoughts?
I am gonna stop using Google services. Switch to bing, MSN email, buy button Nokia phone
Lol. It's refund time
Presumably security updates are considered open source so users "should" get those, depending on how long Huawei take to roll them out ... ?
Way to go America, you've just screwed over Huawei users. Huawei now needs to unlock all their phones and open source their phone software. Become dev friendly and give the US of A the middle finger.
Please don't make Huawei that innocent. See who runs the company and why his daughter was arrested. See why MI5 has concerns about Huawei. See why polish internal security agency arrested one of the bosses working in polish department of huawei. Why is Huawei having so many connections with Chinese gov? This company is just a tool. I hope they get banned from Europe with theirs crap phones as well.
How come Apple does not want to cooperate with US gov? How come they always oppose FBI that wants to have a back door for the iPhones?
Why Samsung or any other company was not blamed for spying?
I am really hoping to get a refund from Three for my P20 Pro...
BraveXL said:
Please don't make Huawei that innocent. See who runs the company and why his daughter was arrested. See why MI5 has concerns about Huawei. See why polish internal security agency arrested one of the bosses working in polish department of huawei. Why is Huawei having so many connections with Chinese gov? This company is just a tool. I hope they get banned from Europe with theirs crap phones as well.
How come Apple does not want to cooperate with US gov? How come they always oppose FBI that wants to have a back door for the iPhones?
Why Samsung or any other company was not blamed for spying?
I am really hoping to get a refund from Three for my P20 Pro...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is strange that only USA complains about Huawei lol
UK, New Zeland, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Japan?????
BraveXL said:
UK, New Zeland, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Japan?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly i prefer the chinese to spy on me rather than FBI.
But there is no proof that they spy on huawei phones, since all Huawei phones are shipped with EMUI europe and not the chinese version.
Why don't you go and live in China then? They have a lovely system that rates citizens based on behaviour and political preferences. What if you had different views than majority and thanks to that you would be denied a credit card or acccess to some services.
You are right, there is no proof they spy on phones but they hold your data. Do you like to hold your data in spy hands?
BraveXL said:
Why don't you go and live in China then? They have a lovely system that rates citizens based on behaviour and political preferences. What if you had different views than majority and thanks to that you would be denied a credit card or acccess to some services.
You are right, there is no proof they spy on phones but they hold your data. Do you like to hold your data in spy hands?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hell did i do other than purchasing a huawei phone that is better and cheaper than all the phones that have released? (talking about the new flagships)
I value my kidneys, hence why i don't use an iphone or the new samsung flagships (even s10E is more explensive than p20 pro in my country).
If you hate Huawei, sell your phone and buy something else. It's Trump's fault for being a jerk over a company that has done better than Apple and maybe against Samsung.
I am not a sheep about this company, but i am saying from my experience.
Trump didn't attack Samsung and Apple because they make the profit in USA, hence why Huawei is attacked. It will apply to Xiaomi soon.
In the end, everybody picks what phone they want and it is a bad move from a president to obligate people who owned their phones that wanted dearly to be trashed by restricting stuff.
I believe in Huawei that they will solve it by giving more attention to Appgallery. They may soon ditch Android for their own os. If they will do it, then i can already see my phone being extremely fluid.
But it's a matter of time. I will say it again, **** Trump.
---------- Post added at 11:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:19 AM ----------
Also, Facebook and all apps owned by them are collecting data too but still not banned.
Take a guess please.
The Restless Soul said:
The hell did i do other than purchasing a huawei phone that is better and cheaper than all the phones that have released? (talking about the new flagships)
I value my kidneys, hence why i don't use an iphone or the new samsung flagships (even s10E is more explensive than p20 pro in my country).
If you hate Huawei, sell your phone and buy something else. It's Trump's fault for being a jerk over a company that has done better than Apple and maybe against Samsung.
I am not a sheep about this company, but i am saying from my experience.
Trump didn't attack Samsung and Apple because they make the profit in USA, hence why Huawei is attacked. It will apply to Xiaomi soon.
In the end, everybody picks what phone they want and it is a bad move from a president to obligate people who owned their phones that wanted dearly to be trashed by restricting stuff.
I believe in Huawei that they will solve it by giving more attention to Appgallery. They may soon ditch Android for their own os. If they will do it, then i can already see my phone being extremely fluid.
But it's a matter of time. I will say it again, **** Trump.
---------- Post added at 11:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:19 AM ----------
Also, Facebook and all apps owned by them are collecting data too but still not banned.
Take a guess please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
**** trump indeed. I'm from the UK and his dumb ass is affecting me too. If it can't be resolved, then I hope Huawei release a tool for unlocking the device, so we can flash custom roms and still have a secure device.
The Restless Soul said:
Honestly i prefer the chinese to spy on me rather than FBI.
But there is no proof that they spy on huawei phones, since all Huawei phones are shipped with EMUI europe and not the chinese version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You honestly think their whole OS is actually 4GB ? Lineage is less than 1GB ?
Think about it.
Yes for sure they will let you unlock the device ???
Basically the ban doesn't change much as Huawei's slow ass security updates appear once-twice a year.
I'm actually glad they lost the license. It's disgusting that 3 year old Galaxy S7 till March had been receiving security updates almost every month. Now they have changed it to quarterly which is still better than Huawei.
I will stick with Huawei, hope they going to over come this difficult time.
dladz said:
You honestly think their whole OS is actually 4GB ? Lineage is less than 1GB ?
Think about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EMUI has lots of features + the desktop mode and whatever ai things it has, hence why it has 4gb total size
LineageOS is just AOSP with a few tweaks, hence why it has 1gb total size.
But either way, the phone comes with 128gb storage so i don't need to worry about running low.
BraveXL said:
Please don't make Huawei that innocent. See who runs the company and why his daughter was arrested. See why MI5 has concerns about Huawei. See why polish internal security agency arrested one of the bosses working in polish department of huawei. Why is Huawei having so many connections with Chinese gov? This company is just a tool. I hope they get banned from Europe with theirs crap phones as well.
How come Apple does not want to cooperate with US gov? How come they always oppose FBI that wants to have a back door for the iPhones?
Why Samsung or any other company was not blamed for spying?
I am really hoping to get a refund from Three for my P20 Pro...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is all about business. Huawei are getting too big for the US liking. They are fast becoming number one phone maker, beating apple, and would be ahead on 5g rollout too but for US interference. Regarding the spying, the Germans found no evidence. Poland in extremely right wing pro US now, hence blocking huawei. American companies Google, Facebook, twitter all collect data on everyone, they are also compliant to US government demands to shut down accounts they don't like. US foreign policy is nearly always about business interests. Its us left holding a huawei phone that may now be left without updates to new releases. Unless maybe there is some comprimise made.
BraveXL said:
Yes for sure they will let you unlock the device
Basically the ban doesn't change much as Huawei's slow ass security updates appear once-twice a year.
I'm actually glad they lost the license. It's disgusting that 3 year old Galaxy S7 till March had been receiving security updates almost every month. Now they have changed it to quarterly which is still better than Huawei.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't just snap and boom you got an update. But i agree with the slow updates but better later than never i guess.
Let's see if we get a new os anyway and then we will get ios-like fast updates.
---------- Post added at 02:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:22 PM ----------
androidyeah... said:
This is all about business. Huawei are getting too big for the US liking. They are fast becoming number one phone maker, beating apple, and would be ahead on 5g rollout too but for US interference. Regarding the spying, the Germans found no evidence. Poland in extremely right wing pro US now, hence blocking huawei. American companies Google, Facebook, twitter all collect data on everyone, they are also compliant to US government demands to shut down accounts they don't like. US foreign policy is nearly always about business interests. Its us left holding a huawei phone that may now be left without updates to new releases. Unless maybe there is some comprimise made.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am expecting Trump to buy each one of us a couple of Iphones or Samsung new devices.
stop... not affected already series huaeei device...only new modell...
androidyeah... said:
This is all about business. Huawei are getting too big for the US liking. They are fast becoming number one phone maker, beating apple, and would be ahead on 5g rollout too but for US interference. Regarding the spying, the Germans found no evidence. Poland in extremely right wing pro US now, hence blocking huawei. American companies Google, Facebook, twitter all collect data on everyone, they are also compliant to US government demands to shut down accounts they don't like. US foreign policy is nearly always about business interests. Its us left holding a huawei phone that may now be left without updates to new releases. Unless maybe there is some comprimise made.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Poland extremely right wing ??? SAY NO MORE ???
I ensure you it is rather left wing party...
Anyway, that makes me wonder why they didn't ban Samsung? Samsung is way ahead from Apple. Why they didn't ban HSBC, Philips, Shell? Or did Donald Trump just have a bad mood and accidentally put his finger over Huawei on his to ban list?
Huawei can only blame itself.