Zen+ Ryzens and Funtoo - Linux

Surprisingly, Ryzen 3500U is better than its 3700U counterparts for the same VAIO E15 laptop
https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/4336961 https://gadgetversus.com/processor/amd-ryzen-7-3700u-vs-amd-ryzen-5-3500u/ 659GBP ÷ 599GBP = 1.1 13 cons and 5 pros for 3700U instead of 3500U 2040 ÷ 2000 = 2.04 (PassMark single thread) 1792 ÷ 1229 =...
forum.xda-developers.com
Subarches - Funtoo
www.funtoo.org
Should it opt for AMD64-Zen or AMD64-Zen2 for such a laptop whose Ryzen is Zen+?
Both Ryzen 3500U and 3700U are Zen+ Ryzens

Related

?CONFUSED?

whats SH3 MIPS & ARM?
and what is the one for XDA IIs?
SH3, MIPS, and ARM are all different processors, like the PowerPC processor in Mac and the x86 (intel/amd) processors in Windows.
In the PPC 2000 devices (the first gen), each company that released a PPC had a different processo...
HP Jornada = sh3
Casio Casiopea = mips
Compaq iPaq = arm
because ARM was the best out of the bunch, MS standardized on the ARM processor for all PPC 2002 devices. Thus, you want ARM when asked.
Although your processor is called Xscale, it's still an ARM design, as is the StrongARM and OMAP processors. Hope that helps!
matthew_wetton said:
whats SH3 MIPS & ARM?
and what is the one for XDA IIs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

SpeedBooster 2.0 benchmark comparison - very dissapointing results

hi.
i ran the benchmark in Speedbooster 2.0 on my Kaiser with Hyperdragon IV Lite version dating April 21st 2009. the results are very dissapointing . it scores 4.99 points with CPU = 6.16, RAM= 6.56 , STORAGE = N/A (why ? ? ?) , VID = 7.24.
why are the scores so low ? other results are :
HTC UNIVERSAL = 7.65
HTC TORNADO = 4.17
IMATE ULTIMATE 6150 = 8.20
ASUS A626 = 8.00
DELL AXIM X51V = 7.34
DELL AXIM X51 = 8.04
TOSHIBA G500 = 7.32
HTC BLUE ANGEL = 8.30
HP IPAQ HW 6515 = 8.20
and why doesn't my fone test the storage card ? i have a Kingston 4gb micro-SDHC
daJudge2010 said:
hi.
i ran the benchmark in Speedbooster 2.0 on my Kaiser with Hyperdragon IV Lite version dating April 21st 2009. the results are very dissapointing . it scores 4.99 points with CPU = 6.16, RAM= 6.56 , STORAGE = N/A (why ? ? ?) , VID = 7.24.
why are the scores so low ? other results are :
HTC UNIVERSAL = 7.65
HTC TORNADO = 4.17
IMATE ULTIMATE 6150 = 8.20
ASUS A626 = 8.00
DELL AXIM X51V = 7.34
DELL AXIM X51 = 8.04
TOSHIBA G500 = 7.32
HTC BLUE ANGEL = 8.30
HP IPAQ HW 6515 = 8.20
and why doesn't my fone test the storage card ? i have a Kingston 4gb micro-SDHC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it a registered copy? Isn't this application shareware with a timebomb of five days? Where are the results shown for other ppc's?

NovaBench - Which PC will be the winner? :D

Hi!
NovaBench is a little free benchmark program. Values every important part of the PC, to give the respective results... and an overall score.
I got
- 8076 MB System RAM (Score: 217)
RAM Speed: 16389 MB/S
- CPU Tests (Score: 583)
- Graphics Tests (Score: 887)
3D Frames Per Second: 2324
- Hardware Tests (Score: 20)
Primary Partition Capacity: 59GB
Drive Write Speed: 235 MB/s
NovaBench Score: 1707
My PC is this:
NZXT Tempest EVO
Thermalright HR-02 Macho
Intel i5 2500k (3.3=>4.8Ghz)
XFX Pro 750S
Sapphire HD 7950 with Boost (925mhz-1250mhz=>1149mhz-1575mhz)
Vengeance 2x4GB DDR3 (1600mhz=>1866mhz)
Asrock z68 Extreme4 gen3
Samsung 830 64GB
Samsung 640GB 2.5”

[Leak] Early benchmark of future ARM chip...

Hi guys
One of my friends today just receive some unknown sample product (He's working on a labs)
+Snap 810 @2,2GHz (development board)
+Tegra K1 64bit Denver Dual Core @2,5 GHz
+Tegra K1 32 bit Quadcore
Benchmark result of Snap 810 vs everything (early beta kernel complied with GCC4.9 and benchmark in 64bit if available)
Single core Snap 810 vs [email protected] 2,5Ghz: increase 25% in single thread and 50% Multithread
+vs Tegra K1 64bit: 28% loss in single thread and 50% faster MultiThread
+vs Tegra K1 32bit: 12% faster in single thread and 34,5% faster in Multithread (2 thread vs 8 thread )
+vs Apple A7: 13,5% loss in singlethread and 86,5% faster in multithread (Same, 2 thread vs 8...)
+vs Apple A8: 20% loss in singlethread and 71% faster in multithread (same thing, 2 vs 8)
Also I have benchmark of Adreno 430(driver and chip still beta): faster than 30% vs Adreno 420, more than 90% faster than Apple A7 (PowerVR G6430) but loss 8-10% vs Tegra K1
Also more breaking news: Samsung Note 4 Exynos version is using Samsung CMC221 modem, Samsung have plan to use Intel XMM7260 with 22 band LTE cat 6 but drop it and using own-product with 7 band lte and cat 4
And Exynos version this time is more powerful than Snap
P/S: All thing I mentioned is confidental and NO PICTURE OF THEM (if they found out we leak them, we will get....)

[CLOSED] [INDEX] ASUS ZenFone Max Pro (M1)

[SIZE=+3]ASUS ZenFone Max Pro (M1)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2][INDEX][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Helpful Information[/SIZE]​[SIZE=+1]Welcome, this thread has been created to encompass everything you may need for your device. Please only post in this thread with feedback on how to improve this document. Do not post "Thank you" type responses. If you have additional questions or require more help, try to find an existing thread, or create your own thread in the Q&A forum. Do not use this as a general help thread.[/SIZE]​
Click on a Link below for More Info
Manufacturer's Device Home Page
Basic Device Information, Reviews
Stock Firmware
Device Tools, Root & Bootloader Unlocking Methods, Recoveries
Custom ROMs
Kernels
Mods, Guides, and Miscellaneous
Changelogs
*​Forum Rules | New Users Guide | XDA Tour | Report Posts​Please look for a similar INDEX thread when visiting another device forum.
If you would like to create an [INDEX] please Click Here.
A special thanks to everyone who contributed to the production of this INDEX
Please note: This is and will be, an ongoing WIP​
[SIZE=+1]Basic Device Information[/SIZE]​
Product Website
Product Specifications:
Network: GSM/WCDMA/LTE
Display: 5.99 inches IPS LCD, 2160*1080 pixels (~403 ppi), 450-nits brightness, 1500:1 contrast ratio, 85% NTSC
Chipset: Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636
CPU: Quad-core Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73 derivative) 1.8 GHz + Quad-core Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53 derivative) 1.6 GHz
GPU: Qualcomm Adreno 509 450 MHz
RAM: 3/4/6 GB LPDDR4X 1333 MHz dual-channel
Storage: 32 (3 GB) / 64 GB (4/6 GB) eMCP with MicroSD up to 512 GB (dedicated)
Camera: 13 MP SK Hynix Hi-1333 or OmniVision OV13855 (f/2.2, 3/4 GB) / 16 MP OmniVision OV16885 (f/2.0, 6 GB) [1.12-micron pixels] with 5 MP Galaxycore GC5025 or SK Hynix Hi-556 [f/2.4, 1.12-micron pixels, depth effect] + 8 MP SK Hynix Hi-846 or OmniVision OV8856 (f/2.2, 3/4 GB) / 16 MP OmniVision OV16880 (f/2.0, 6 GB)
Battery: Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh
Extras: Fingerprint (CDfinger/Goodix), NFC (certain variants, primarily Russia), Qualcomm aptX (HD)
Shipped Android Version: Android 8.1.0 Oreo
Detailed info on GSM Arena
[SIZE=+1]Reviews[/SIZE]​
XDA Real Life Review section
GSM Arena
[SIZE=+1]Stock Firmwares[/SIZE]​
ASUS Product Support - Driver & Utility (BIOS & Firmware)
[ROM][STOCK][17-Oct] TWRP flashable Stock ROM [v331] - by AVinaSh_S
Firmware-only zip
[SIZE=+1]Device Tools[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Root & Bootloader Unlocking Methods[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Recoveries[/SIZE]​
[SIZE=+1]Custom ROMs[/SIZE]​
[SIZE=+1]Kernels[/SIZE]​
[SIZE=+1]Mods[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Guides[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Miscellaneous[/SIZE]​
[SIZE=+1]Changelogs[/SIZE]​
WIP
Oops, there's similar thread like this already here. Closing.

Categories

Resources