Related
LG OPTIMUS 2X ICS 4.0.3 Alpha kang 15
Quadrant: 2503
Antutu: 5373
nenomark2: 27.7
Linpack: 47.166
my quadrant ended up at 2550
with gingerbread I had 4100, damn how i miss that overcloaking.
* Edit
Running ICS now with 1.4GHz and scored 3374 on quadrant
This is my O2X.
ICS Nova HD+ R7-17 Ironkrnl,32MB RAMhack
1312 MHz
----------------------------
AnTuTu : 6684
Quadrant : 3013
Linpack: 78.669
________________________
1500 MHz
----------------------------
AnTuTu : 7372
Quadrant : 3467
Linpack: 88.632
________________________
Quadrant 3152
Antutu 6377
Nova R7-17 + Ironkrnl, 1312 Mghz OC
Nearly double my old Captivate
zereke said:
my quadrant ended up at 2550
with gingerbread I had 4100, damn how i miss that overcloaking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant app is updated with new score now...
It gives lesser than what it used to give earlier
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
My score
ROM :ICS 4.0.3 Alpha kang 15
Kernal : Ironkrnl 48mb RAM Hack
CPU : 1.5Ghz
Quadrant : 3545
Antutu : 7003
Nenamark2 : 33.7fps
Linpack Mutli-thread : 83.9MFLOPS
Here my benchs as Screenshots
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
world_of_ursus said:
Here my benchs as Screenshots View attachment 939209View attachment 939210View attachment 939211
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A what clock speed?
almighty15 said:
A what clock speed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It must be 1,3 or 1,4 GHz. It would be too much for lower frequency.
greate scores guys. im thinking to overclock to. but im waried about battery life. is there difference in battery life? and what kernel to use for overclocking with ICS rom kangs from owain94
My bad... wrong section.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
oleg1981 said:
greate scores guys. im thinking to overclock to. but im waried about battery life. is there difference in battery life? and what kernel to use for overclocking with ICS rom kangs from owain94
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never noticed lower battery life after overclocking. Only when you use full power for longer time it drains battery faster.
About kernel for Kang you should use ironkrnl. Everything important you can find here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1517301
Afaik, overclocking it's actually just changing the maximum clock frequency, right? Which is only used according to CPU use. If your phone is on idle it will use the minimum configured CPU frequency, so it would not have an impact on battery drainage, only when you're doing CPU demanding tasks.
However, other than battery drainage, it will increase the temperature your CPU reaches when performing these tasks, which might lead to instability. As I've never come across an app or game that lagged, that is why I don't overclock, I don't see the point in risking CPU overheat.
Has anyone seen any difference while playing a game or using an app from regular clocked to an overclocked CPU?
Before we start, I'm running The latest firmware .757 with Advanced Kernel.
So the problem is the minimum frequency is shown as 1190Mhz but it's running as low as 300Mhz. Tried changing it to show 300Mhz but it keeps changing back to 1190Mhz.
Any ideas? It's not a big problem but it's becoming very annoying.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LeParkour012 said:
Before we start, I'm running The latest firmware .757 with Advanced Kernel.
So the problem is the minimum frequency is shown as 1190Mhz but it's running as low as 300Mhz. Tried changing it to show 300Mhz but it keeps changing back to 1190Mhz.
Any ideas? It's not a big problem but it's becoming very annoying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't use all the time the maximum frequency of CPU cores...i've tested myself with the same Antutu CPU Benchmark and i have the same, in IDLE the cpus frequency is 300Mhz, if i start a game that jump to higher frequency, there is nothing stange here.
I'm talking about what these 2 app shows me. My minimum frequency is 300Mhz yet it's showing 1190Mhz.
Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk
LeParkour012 said:
I'm talking about what these 2 app shows me. My minimum frequency is 300Mhz yet it's showing 1190Mhz.
Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That mean that the minimal frequency is 300Mhz i don't understand your problem i have the same thing, when the phone is IDLing it's at 300Mhz, that seems legit.
Yes my minimum frequency is 300MHz but both the screenshots is telling me that my minimum frequency is 1190Mhz, which is wrong. My problem is that they're not telling me the correct frequency.
Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk
LeParkour012 said:
Yes my minimum frequency is 300MHz but both the screenshots is telling me that my minimum frequency is 1190Mhz, which is wrong. My problem is that they're not telling me the correct frequency.
Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The first one said your current frequency is 300Mhz (your phone IDLE) and minimum 1190, this app seems just broken or wrong.
The 2nd clearly show the minimum is 300Mhz and the current is 422,4Mhz
I trust Antutu CPU Master because i have the same results.
Try a different CPU app, like set cpu, see what that says, i think it could just be a glitch on that CPU app.
Chances are it's reporting it wrongly and it'll be down to the app, if it was on 1190 all the time your battery life would really suffer for it.
Also try to alter the governor in the app, could be that on another one like interactive or power save it'll yield different results.
This is because of Qualcomm MP-Decision that controls the hotplugging, that tells the CPU to boost MIN freq to 1190 Mhz to fake UI smoothness and response, about 2-3 second then ramp quickly down to 300 Mhz, and then do the same over and over again. Good for performance, bad for battery.
This is also a part of Qualcomms own Project Butter solution - using / forcing the device into overdrive mode w/o any thoughts on heat generation / stuttering by nearly instant & uneven shifting between frequencies, thanks to a built-in touch boost feature that is boosting the phone to 1190 Mhz in Z1 case, was at 1026 Mhz frequency spectrum at Z / devices that used the same QC shipset as the Z.
This is fixed by @faux123 in his rewritten Intelliplug module, that conserves / keeps the performance (even improves it..) and boosting battery life with a more natural step pattern through your device various CPU clock frequencies.
EDIT: More easy understood info on those two links!
Link 1
Link 2
Sent from my Xperia Z1 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I have the same problem. Can't even set my min frequency to any other then 300MHz.
Would like to raise it a bit becose sometimes its freezing when starting the camera using the physica button.
I can only change the max frequency.
Any help Would be very appreciated.
Thank you
Z1 4.4.4 stock & locked bootloader
I had the same problem, just try the No-frills cpu control it works for me (when your phone is idle it will always running at 300 because it is trying to save battery)
I decided to test how my old Droid 4 will perform in benchmarks in 2017. Here are the first benchmarks. If you want to see more benchmarks, please recommend some of them. You can also post your scores .
Device: Motorola Droid 4
ROM: CyanogenMod 13 (latest Nightly)
Launcher: Nova Prime
Geekbench 4
Stock CM kernel 1.2Ghz: 374/624
OC kernel 1.3Ghz (FullScale Lite): 398/656
My unit will not run at 1.4Ghz stable so I only tested at 1.3Ghz. Benchmark score increased about 6%. I believe that at 1.4Ghz single core score would be over 400.
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890, 2.3GHz): 1784/5201 (2016)
Galaxy S7 (Snapdragon 820, 2.15Ghz): 1560/3791 (2016)
LG X Power (MT6735M, 1.3Ghz): 558/1509 (2016)
Moto G (2014) (Snapdragon 400, 1.2Ghz): 427/1060 (2014)
Moto E3 (MT6735P, 1.0Ghz): 425/1122 (2016)
Galaxy S II (Exynos 4210, 1.2Ghz): 424/777 (2011)
Galaxy Nexus (OMAP 4460, 1.2Ghz): 409/651 (2011)
Droid 4 (OMAP 4430, 1.3Ghz): 398/656 (2012)
Galaxy S5 Mini (Exynos 3470, 1.4Ghz): 392/1061 (2014)
RAZR XT910 (OMAP 4430, 1.2Ghz): 369/587 (2011)
Discomark
I ran the tests with OC kernel at 1.3Ghz
Animations were turned off during tests from developer settings and Nova settings
I ran Hot test 3 times (the result is average) and Cold test only once
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hot test results are pretty good but Cold test results quite poor. As long as the app is loaded from the memory (RAM) there shouldn't be any major lag.
Comparison:
AnTuTu
I ran the tests with OC kernel at 1.3Ghz
Total Score: 20503
3D: 139
Marooned: Unsupported
Garden: 139
UX: 9475
UX Data Secure: 3013
UX Data process: 1831
UX Strategy games: 2432
UX Image process: 1564
UX I/O performance: 633
CPU: 9081
CPU Mathematics: 2079
CPU Common Use: 3569
CPU Multi-Core: 3433
RAM: 1808
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890): 130909
LG X Power: 31966
Moto G (2014): 22345
Moto E3: 19000
3DMark - Ice Storm:
Ice Storm: 2003
Graphics score: 1765
Physics score: 3788
Graphics test 1: 8.4 FPS
Graphics test 2: 7.1 FPS
Physics test: 12 FPS
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (SD820)
Forced vertical sync on Android devices limits apps to displaying a maximum of 60 frames per second. Your score will be shown as "Maxed out" if your device hits the vertical sync limit during a test.
Average score: Maxed out!
Physics score: Maxed out!
Graphics score: Maxed out!
Graphics test 1: 60 FPS
Graphics test 2: 59 FPS
Physics test: 54 FPS
LG X power
Average score: 4851
Physics score: 9149
Graphics score: 4285
Graphics test 1: 19 FPS
Graphics test 2: 18 FPS
Physics test: 29 FPS
Moto G (2014)
Average score: 4651
Physics score: 7781
Graphics score: 4176
Graphics test 1: 24 FPS
Graphics test 2: 15 FPS
Physics test: 25 FPS
Moto E3
Average score: 3471
Physics score: 5934
Graphics score: 3106
Graphics test 1: 14 FPS
Graphics test 2: 13 FPS
Physics test: 19 FPS
Flash-A-Holic said:
I decided to test how my old Droid 4 will perform in benchmarks in 2017. Here are the first benchmarks. If you want to see more benchmarks, please recommend some of them. You can also post your scores .
Device: Motorola Droid 4
ROM: CyanogenMod 13 (latest Nightly)
Geekbench 4
Stock CM kernel 1.2Ghz: 374/624
OC kernel 1.3Ghz (FullScale Lite): 398/656
My unit will not run at 1.4Ghz stable so I only tested at 1.3Ghz. Benchmark score increased about 6%. I believe that at 1.4Ghz score would be over 400.
Comparison:
Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890, 2.3GHz): 1784/5201 (2016)
Galaxy S7 (Snapdragon 820, 2.15Ghz): 1560/3791 (2016)
LG X Power (MT6735M, 1.3Ghz): 558/1509 (2016)
Moto G (2014) (Snapdragon 400, 1.2Ghz): 427/1060 (2014)
Moto E3 (MT6735P, 1.0Ghz): 425/1122 (2016)
Galaxy S II (Exynos 4210, 1.2Ghz): 424/777 (2011)
Galaxy Nexus (OMAP 4460, 1.2Ghz): 409/651 (2011)
Droid 4 (OMAP 4430, 1.3Ghz): 398/656 (2012)
Galaxy S5 Mini (Exynos 3470, 1.4Ghz): 392/1061 (2014)
RAZR XT910 (OMAP 4430, 1.2Ghz): 369/587 (2011)
Discomark
I ran the tests with OC kernel at 1.3Ghz
I ran Hot test 3 times (the result is average) and Cold test only once
Hot test results are pretty good but Cold test results quite poor. As long as the app is loaded in the memory there shouldn't be any major lag.
Comparison:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tests. At leat it was higher than the S5 mini. Droid 4 is still ticking.
AnTuTu and 3DMark - Ice Storm added
OGdroidster said:
Thanks for the tests. At leat it was higher than the S5 mini. Droid 4 is still ticking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I think that too :highfive:. I decided to run GPU benchmark also. First I tried to run GFXBench T-Rex (ES 2.0) but it failed (out of memory error). So I added 3DMark Ice Storm results instead. It seems that GPU performance and memory are the weak points for Droid 4. Otherwise everything else seems to be okay.
EDIT: AnTuTu also added.
Ps. Could you edit quote a bit smaller?
Flash-A-Holic said:
Yeah, I think that too :highfive:. I decided to run GPU benchmark also. First I tried to run GFXBench T-Rex (ES 2.0) but it failed (out of memory error). So I added 3DMark Ice Storm results instead. It seems that GPU performance and memory are the weak points for Droid 4. Otherwise everything else seems to be okay.
Ps. Could you edit quote a bit smaller?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. I tinker with memory to get it to run properly as I run alot of extensive audio stuff software wise. once i got it perfect it was good to go, memory wise. But GPU can't do much there without the device acting buggy. Just happy this device is ticking :good: oh changed the font to size 1. Its at the top of editing. I never paid attention to it before.
Hello, I bought the phone yesterday (Indian global rom) and after an auto-update for MIUI 12 (12.0.2.0 QFKINXM), installed geekbench 5 and antutu (8.4.4) to try them out. I got substantially lower score in antutu (compared to reviews, YouTube videos) and breakdown showed it's the CPU causing the low score. Upon further benchmarking with Geekbench 5, geekbench 4 and 3dmark it was evident I was getting low score across all the benchmarks where CPU was involved and fantastic score in gpu-only tests (like multiple scenarios in gfxbench).
Then I installed Aida64 and "CPU Monitor" app to further investigate the issue and find possible correlation with temperature etc. The temperature seemed to hover around 55/65 deg while stress testing and 35/40 deg when idle.
I then checked the CPU clockspeed with CPU Monitor app in split screen mode while running Geekbench. I noticed the fastest Kryo gold 485 core (with 2.84 GHz speed never reached the peak). I then ran the Antutu 15-min stress test, and also "CPU Throttle Test" app and "CPU Load Generator" app while keeping the "CPU Monitor" app open in split-screen and noticed the same thing, the most powerful core never reached its peak and mostly runs at idle clock speed of ~800 MHz even when benchmarking. Further, even when that core boosts, it seems capped at 2.4 GHz which is thehe maximum clockspeed of other 3 Kryo gold 485 cores. I know 2.84 GHz isn't supposed to be a sustained speed but the fact that it never reached it and gets capped at the same speed as the other 3 cores implies something is wrong here.
Also I don't really know if the poor score is solely caused by the poor performance of that 2.84 GHz core but I do know from observation that the core isn't running as intended as I explained above.
Now if it's a software issue then i wouldn't worry much as it'll possibly get fixed in next updates or by installing custom rom. But I'm worried if the issue is related to hardware itself (problematic CPU core or heatsink issue).
So I'm writing to know if any of you guys have had such issue or what do u think it is caused from or possible fix. Also
Any constructive suggestion will be highly welcome.
Geekbench 5 CPU score: single core ~600, multi-core ~2200 to 2300
Antutu 8 CPU score: ~90k (sometimes much less)
I have an mi 9t pro with the global miui 12.0.1 and it's similar to what you're saying, so it's not a hardware issue, it's the kernel, it seems that Xiaomi it's very conservative about the battery and throttles the prime core to 2.4ghz max
The only thing that have worked for me was to change the kernel to another one, I'm trying Yuki kernel and it's very good, also there's a new kernel, quantic, and it's very good too, the battery doesn't seems to take a big hit, it's fine for me, like the original kernel, sorry if my english it's not perfect, I'm from Mexico
Omarrrc1 said:
I have an mi 9t pro with the global miui 12.0.1 and it's similar to what you're saying, so it's not a hardware issue, it's the kernel, it seems that Xiaomi it's very conservative about the battery and throttles the prime core to 2.4ghz max
The only thing that have worked for me was to change the kernel to another one, I'm trying Yuki kernel and it's very good, also there's a new kernel, quantic, and it's very good too, the battery doesn't seems to take a big hit, it's fine for me, like the original kernel, sorry if my english it's not perfect, I'm from Mexico
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, thanks for your reply and your English is awesome.
Now regarding the kernel change, all the reviewers and YouTubers benchmarked it in stock and most of them didn't face such problem. Their score seems reasonably similar to each other.
Also do u remember if your CPU benchmark score was substantially lower than standard before changing kernel?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
60c is where CPU starts to throttle, prime core never runs at max freq for more than 3-4 mins regardless of temperature to save battery and wear from the heat it's producing on stock kernel.
Also never forget how much a impact ambient temps play a part in phone performance, I've put my phone in the freezer for 5-10 mins and saw a 500 multi core score although that was on a warm 40c Aus summer day lol
As others have suggested try custom rom if you really need max performance although it is completely unnecessary and a waste of time pursuing max performance, take it from someone who's been there.
The result after a month of trying every combination of roms and kernels lol
hoopsnake said:
View attachment 507762560c is where CPU starts to throttle, prime core never runs at max freq for more than 3-4 mins regardless of temperature to save battery and wear from the heat it's producing on stock kernel.
Also never forget how much a impact ambient temps play a part in phone performance, I've put my phone in the freezer for 5-10 mins and saw a 500 multi core score although that was on a warm 40c Aus summer day lol
As others have suggested try custom rom if you really need max performance although it is completely unnecessary and a waste of time pursuing max performance, take it from someone who's been there.
The result after a month of trying every combination of roms and kernels lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. However my issue is it never reached 2.84 GHz and is artificially capped at 2.4 ghz. I'm not talking about the core being constant at 2.84 GHz.
Also I'm not necessarily looking for absolute max performance as I'm not a gamer but just wanna investigate the issue to make sure it's not hardware issue.
Btw if you've come back to stock rom/kernel, can you pls test and mention the geekbench 5, antutu 8, 3dmark scores for K20 pro?
I have the Redmi Note 11 6GB/64GB variant (bought it less than a week ago). I got to doing some benchmarking of my phone. I first checked the benchmark scores for my device on various sites and YouTube videos.
First, the Geek Bench 5 scores should be (according to YT reviewers' videos and other websites) around 364 for single core and 1500 for multi core . My device's score was 171 for single core and 911 for multicore.
Then I performed the AnTuTu benchmark and the scores should be around 270k but my score was 173847. Now that's a lot of difference, I wouldn't mind if the score was like 220k or something but 270k to 170k is a lot of difference.
I performed the benchmark tests in the first place because I was facing lag even while using Instagram and scrolling through WhatsApp and Telegram, I have restarted my device several times, the free RAM is always around or more than 3GB, I don't have many apps installed either. I have more than 50% of my storage free, nothing heavy was running in background while testing either. I don't play heavy games or stuff but I at least want my daily use experience to be smooth, what's the point if I can't even scroll Instagram without facing lags?
Here are the screenshots of the scores from Geek Bench and AnTuTu.
I'm extremely dissatisfied with this, should I get a replacement? I'm not really sure if the issue is with my device's hardware or it's MIUI's fault. If it's the latter then I'm ready to flash a custom rom to my phone if it will fix the issue. What could be the problem? Any help is appreciated.
_voldemort_with_a_nose_ said:
I have the Redmi Note 11 6GB/64GB variant (bought it less than a week ago). I got to doing some benchmarking of my phone. I first checked the benchmark scores for my device on various sites and YouTube videos.
First, the Geek Bench 5 scores should be (according to YT reviewers' videos and other websites) around 364 for single core and 1500 for multi core . My device's score was 171 for single core and 911 for multicore.
Then I performed the AnTuTu benchmark and the scores should be around 270k but my score was 173847. Now that's a lot of difference, I wouldn't mind if the score was like 220k or something but 270k to 170k is a lot of difference.
I performed the benchmark tests in the first place because I was facing lag even while using Instagram and scrolling through WhatsApp and Telegram, I have restarted my device several times, the free RAM is always around or more than 3GB, I don't have many apps installed either. I have more than 50% of my storage free, nothing heavy was running in background while testing either. I don't play heavy games or stuff but I at least want my daily use experience to be smooth, what's the point if I can't even scroll Instagram without facing lags?
Here are the screenshots of the scores from Geek Bench and AnTuTu.
I'm extremely dissatisfied with this, should I get a replacement? I'm not really sure if the issue is with my device's hardware or it's MIUI's fault. If it's the latter then I'm ready to flash a custom rom to my phone if it will fix the issue. What could be the problem? Any help is appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same problem
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
thats the 4/64 variant of mine
also the LTE speeds are trash
Raider0001 said:
View attachment 5580313
thats the 4/64 variant of mine
also the LTE speeds are trash
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya the LTE speeds are somewhat slower on this phone. At my home, on my Pixel 4a I get 20-40 Mbps with Airtel 4G, but on Redmi note 11 I get around 15-30 Mbps. It never cross 30 and reach 40 like pixel 4a.
I have the 6GB/64GB variant.
Also slower WIFI speeds. I have a BSNL Fiber wifi at home. Its just 2.4 Ghz but my pixel 4a reach speed upto 90-100 Mbps, whereas Note 11 never cross 50 Mbps. I know Note 11 will give faster speeds with 5Ghz wifi, but sill if pixel can reach 100mbps with 2.5ghz wifi then Note 11 should have been able to reach those speeds too.
Anyways, 50Mbps wifi and 30Mbps LTE speed is enough for me. So no complaints. LTE speed increases to 50-60mbps when I am in good network coverge area.
it fixed itself or the update i did manually helped (V13.0.7.0.RGKEUXM) but the score now is this:
Raider0001 said:
it fixed itself or the update i did manually helped (V13.0.7.0.RGKEUXM) but the score now is this:
View attachment 5588385
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you make a couple of phone calls and try out the same benchmark? I am sure you should see decreased performance.
Check this for what's going on in detail.
*** New Device Forum Requests ***
Please post all your requests here. The forum admins choose new device forums carefully, based on several factors. There's no guarantee your device will have a forum created here, but feel free to posts your requests in this thread :) Please do...
forum.xda-developers.com
Unfortunately, xda-developers not allowing a forum to be created for this device(Redmi note 11 spes) for reasons unknown despite so many requests!
After a phone call the cpu caps at 50%. I had this phone.