Question What is this type of picture distortion, how to avoid in future? - Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra

Does anyone recognize this type of image distortion, and what settings can avoid it?
I'm guessing it's unavoidable as something baked-in to how the camera tries to do selective image stacking/bracketing on only certain parts of the image, and being too unsophisticated to do it right.
This motivates me to finally figure out how to install google camera.
Look at the weird outline around the bird's head:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here are the settings, also attached original JPG image:
Filename - 20220424_120754.jpg
ImageWidth - 4000
ImageLength - 3000
Make - samsung
Model - SM-G998U
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
Software - G998USQU5CVCG
DateTime - 2022:04:24 12:07:55
YCbCrPositioning - Centered
ExifOffset - 238
ExposureTime - 1/379 seconds
FNumber - 4.90
ExposureProgram - Normal program
ISOSpeedRatings - 50
ExifVersion - 0220
DateTimeOriginal - 2022:04:24 12:07:55
DateTimeDigitized - 2022:04:24 12:07:55
OffsetTime - -04:00
OffsetTimeOriginal - -04:00
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/380 seconds
ApertureValue - F 4.89
BrightnessValue - 9.18
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 4.89
MeteringMode - Center weighted average
Flash - Not fired
FocalLength - 30.60 mm
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 4000
ExifImageHeight - 3000
ExposureMode - Auto
White Balance - Auto
DigitalZoomRatio - 10.00 x
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 240 mm
SceneCaptureType - Standard
GPS information: -
GPSLatitudeRef - N
GPSLatitude - 38 19 37.222679 (38.327006)
GPSLongitudeRef - W
GPSLongitude - 75 4 59.453041 (75.083181)
GPSAltitudeRef - Sea level reference
GPSAltitude - 26 m
Thumbnail: -
ImageWidth - 512
ImageLength - 384
Compression - 6 (JPG)
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
JpegIFOffset - 948
JpegIFByteCount - 54701
Another example where I took a photo of a flock of birds, and you can see how the wings are flapping even though it was a single snapshot, not a video, suggesting again the weird image stacking but poorly done:
Exif info:
Filename - 20220424_120710.jpg
ImageWidth - 4000
ImageLength - 3000
Make - samsung
Model - SM-G998U
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
Software - G998USQU5CVCG
DateTime - 2022:04:24 12:07:10
YCbCrPositioning - Centered
ExifOffset - 238
ExposureTime - 1/612 seconds
FNumber - 4.90
ExposureProgram - Normal program
ISOSpeedRatings - 50
ExifVersion - 0220
DateTimeOriginal - 2022:04:24 12:07:10
DateTimeDigitized - 2022:04:24 12:07:10
OffsetTime - -04:00
OffsetTimeOriginal - -04:00
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/613 seconds
ApertureValue - F 4.89
BrightnessValue - 9.89
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 4.89
MeteringMode - Center weighted average
Flash - Not fired
FocalLength - 30.60 mm
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 4000
ExifImageHeight - 3000
ExposureMode - Auto
White Balance - Auto
DigitalZoomRatio - 10.00 x
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 240 mm
SceneCaptureType - Standard
GPS information: -
GPSLatitudeRef - N
GPSLatitude - 38 19 37.284599 (38.327023)
GPSLongitudeRef - W
GPSLongitude - 75 4 59.422081 (75.083173)
GPSAltitudeRef - Sea level reference
GPSAltitude - 21 m
Thumbnail: -
ImageWidth - 512
ImageLength - 384
Compression - 6 (JPG)
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
JpegIFOffset - 948
JpegIFByteCount - 13200

Hardware problem i think

While you seem to have more knowledge on the depth of this camera, I thought I'd mention this just in case.
I'm a huge fan of portrait mode for subjects within 3-6 feet in the stock Samsung camera because you can do tricky filters in post. I very often use the "color point" effect in particular. As the software tries to isolate the color of the subject, if the background colors are within similar saturation/temperatures it'll occasionally "bleed" into the subject's colors & create a halo effect.
Here's an example of one I took this morning. In my case, this is normal since the dog's fur color shares similarities with the hard wood. So some of the "blondish brown" in the wood bled through & created the halo effect you can see around the dog - particularly around the ears.
Again, this probably isn't the case with you. Definitely try another camera app as you stated.

the second image implies that the shutter was kept open a bit too long and the camera captured variations of the bird flocks' wing/position hence ghost images imprinted. The camera may have done so to take additional reference images to use in order to perform the fine touch but ended up producing this compilation of a mess.
i would try reproducing the issue if it's quite consistent, then report to samsung members app > get help > error report and attach the original image

TheNewGuy92 said:
the second image implies that the shutter was kept open a bit too long and the camera captured variations of the bird flocks' wing/position hence ghost images imprinted. The camera may have done so to take additional reference images to use in order to perform the fine touch but ended up producing this compilation of a mess.
i would try reproducing the issue if it's quite consistent, then report to samsung members app > get help > error report and attach the original image
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you agree that it's impossible to control the "fine touch" image stacking?
When you look at the EXIF data for that bird wing flapping shot, the shutter speed reported by the camera is faster than the blink of the eye, only 1/613 second.
There is NO WAY a bird can flap his wing faster than 1/613 of a second, not even a hummingbird (their flapping is more like 1/10 second or 1/15 second per flap).
So my point is why did the camera report a shutter speed that is extremely fast, yet the camera shows wings in different positions, and therefore I cannot change a setting that would affect this.
Increasing shutter speed would not affect this, I'm just confused? Is there a global camera setting that a user can change to prevent this weird mismatch?

olafsand said:
Hardware problem i think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah... I've never seen that before (first image).
Shoot similar shot in raw mode. If it persists it's likely a hardware failure.
Throw it back at Samsung and let them sort it out.

KingFatty said:
Would you agree that it's impossible to control the "fine touch" image stacking?
When you look at the EXIF data for that bird wing flapping shot, the shutter speed reported by the camera is faster than the blink of the eye, only 1/613 second.
There is NO WAY a bird can flap his wing faster than 1/613 of a second, not even a hummingbird (their flapping is more like 1/10 second or 1/15 second per flap).
So my point is why did the camera report a shutter speed that is extremely fast, yet the camera shows wings in different positions, and therefore I cannot change a setting that would affect this.
Increasing shutter speed would not affect this, I'm just confused? Is there a global camera setting that a user can change to prevent this weird mismatch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know the full detail of how samsung's camera works behind all them programmings.
My assumption is that the main photo (one you captured) takes that fast shutter image that it is set to, uses other lenses or maybe the same lens to take addition references to do its thing and attempt to make a better image.
The best DIY tests I got in mind is to try using the RAW Expert camera app to strictly remove as much of the algorithm as possible and see if it's still doing this.
If it is, then maybe I was wrong in assuming it was the algorithm acting out and really is a hardware issue.
Another option is to just go and have the camera module replaced and see if that fixes the issue.
One other test option is to use another app to see if it does the same thing. since the 3rd party app won't be affected by samsung's default image processing algorithm as much (hence people complaining about poor 3rd party app image quality lolol)

Related

Jessica Alba - Sin City Animated Wallpapers for S2U2 (Portrait and Landscape)

ANIMATED GIF Wallpapers of Jessica Alba from Sin City. Nearly all of them I was able to produce a matching portrait and landscape variations
I've spent some time ripping a 640x480 AVI from the HD video. Then converting the AVI into thousands of GIFs, putting them together, framing it for portrait and another copy for landscape and then running it thru some optimizations to try to cut down the filesizes. It took me a while to figure it out and trying all kinds of different video editing/conversion software, but I'm happy with the results. And happy to share it with my favorite PPC community
- 2 Quality Levels. 256 color depth and 32 color depth. As of initial versions no blur effect has been added.
- Accurate Movie Speed. 1/5 the original frame rate but adjusted to be as close as possible animation speed.
- Sub 10sec Duration. Some of the animations that exceeded S2U2's 10 second timeouts have been shorted and frame rate adjusted where seen fit.
Hope everyone likes them as much as I do. Feel free to share this with any other websites but please give me a shoutout for my effort in putting them together
Special thanks to A_C for the great work he's done with S2U2.
Part 0 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality Portrait = part0-portrait-fr5.gif (329KB)
High Quality Landscape = part0-landscape-fr5.gif (332KB)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Low Quality Portrait = part0-portrait-fr5-cr32.gif (141KB)
Low Quality Landscape = part0-landscape-fr5-cr32.gif (182KB)
Part 1 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality = part1-portrait-fr5-10sec.gif (1097KB)
Low Quality = part1-portrait-fr5-cr32-10sec.gif (635KB)
Part 2 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality Portrait = part2-portrait-fr5-10sec.gif (1017KB)
High Quality Landscape = part2-portrait-fr5-10sec.gif (819KB)
Low Quality Portrait = part2-portrait-fr5-cr32-10sec.gif (546KB)
Low Quality Landscape = part2-portrait-fr5-cr32-10sec.gif (431KB)
Part 3 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality = part3-portrait-fr5-10sec.gif (868KB)
Low Quality = part3-portrait-fr5-cr32-10sec.gif (529KB)
Part 4 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality = part4-portrait-fr5.gif (625KB)
Low Quality = part4-portrait-fr5-cr32.gif (347KB)
Part 5 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality = part5-portrait-fr5.gif (608KB)
Low Quality = part5-portrait-fr5-cr32.gif (335KB)
Part 6 - Portrait and Landscape
Saving for Part 6
Part 7 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality = part7-landscape-fr5-10sec.gif (1460KB)
Low Quality = part7-landscape-fr5-10sec.gif (775KB)
Part 8 - Portrait and Landscape
High Quality Portrait = part8-portrait-fr5.gif (1000KB)
High Quality Landscape = part8-landscape-fr5.gif (813KB)
Low Quality Portrait = part8-portrait-fr5-cr32.gif (505KB)
Low Quality Landscape = part8-landscape-fr5-cr32.gif (435KB)
I would love to get this one to loop smoothly. It currently goes from surprised/shock to a beautiful smile. I tried deleting the first couple frames so it'll be all smiles but her head position sinks just a little bit so its not as smooth as a transition.
Thanks for your hard work !! They look great
Yeaah boy!! damn.. can't imagine the amount of time you put into this!
Thanks!!!
Oh.. you might want to try looping some of the really nice tidbits to maintain a high fps. But great work nonetheless.
HOT HOT HOT Stuff!!!! Your hard work is looking good!!!
Great awesome work!
I like your help to know what software did you use to create this mind blowing .gif? I want to create a *.gif for my personal portairt to show up when my phone starts.
Also, where did you get the software as well to create this high class *.gif.
Keep the great work!
-Love_2_Crack.
Once you have a video source you can use Rad Video Tools (Donation-ware) to convert into a GIF.
http://www.radgametools.com/bnkdown.htm
Rad Video lets you convert from a bunch of common video formats into other video formats and even frame-by-frame still images. When I ran my video thru RadVideo it created like 2500 GIF files for the couple minute scene. I flipped thru them and deleted the ones I didn't want. Then I used Adobe Image Ready's import feature.
Image Ready CS lets you import a whole folder worth of GIFs and turns the frames into a single animation. It will put them in the correct order too because Rad Video names them sequentually. All you have to do at that point is save them using "Optimized As...". If you save normally it'll want to save it as a PSD.
Also to get the proper cropping for portrait and landscape I had to do it manually by adjusting the canvas size for each version. I couldn't figure out how to move all the frames at one time which may have been easier. But either way it worked out fairly quickly.
SeanFromSoCal said:
I couldn't figure out how to move all the frames at one time which may have been easier. But either way it worked out fairly quickly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just put the layers in one group (the folder icon on the Layers Window), then use a CTRL-Drag on the whole group. Hope that helps.
can u please make jessica alba in 320x320 resolution. tnx
wow
If only her acting could be as good as her looks.
She's actually pretty good at acting. Have you seen The Eye? Well, better than Fox at least Btw since I'm on that topic. Would you mind making a Megan Fox one? Or I could just try myself.

camera app that really works - request

Hello to everybody,
Before alot of search i`ll try to ask it to you.
Ìs it possible that there isn`t any apps that let you use all potentility of the g1 camera?
I`ve seen that in hero rom(but now i have cym 4.2.5) the htc camera let you set iso, contrast, night mode, and a lot of features, i`ve buy all camera apps in market but any of these let you set these parameter.
I would pay for an app that let me use my camera in all its features.
Any suggestions?
FXCamera is free and i like it check it out
yes, i've already try it, but it's not what i want
Our product Camera ZOOM FX offers a very high degree of customization of the G1 camera's abilities. A Droid version is expected to be available in the next 10 days. Camera ZOOM FX is available on the Android Market for £1.29 or on the SlideME market.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It features the following features :
- 40 photo fx! (pencil, fisheye, filmreel, etc.)
- circular zoom wheel (6x zoom)
- upscale zoomed images
- tap screen to snap shot
- timer + sound effect
- auto focus on / off
- burst mode up to 16 shots
- photo booth = quad camera!
- stable shot including stability meter
- sound activate
- props, borders and famous ‘buddies’ in your pictures
- customizable grid overlays
- whitebalance
- nightshot
- geotag
- send, share
- 1-click upload facebook, twitter, myspace
- silent mode
- antibanding (for TV / computer monitors)
- auto save option
- digi composites
More information is available on our website :
http://www.androidslide.com/camerazoom
We continue to update the product so feature requests are always welcome.
Snap Photo Pro?
yes, i already buy it, but this not have any contrast regulation, or iso setting or exposure etc.
i would like to have these features but... nobody do that.
The problem i that in low light or in night the photos are so dark.
It's not a DSLR, it's a camera on a phone.
yes i know, but for example in built in camera in hero rom there is the regulation of constrast, saturation and sharpness, and iso, and if i set high iso and low contrast i can take beautiful and clear photos with very low light.
davidesatta said:
yes i know, but for example in built in camera in hero rom there is the regulation of constrast, saturation and sharpness, and iso, and if i set high iso and low contrast i can take beautiful and clear photos with very low light.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then you should get a hero phone or run a hero rom. again, this is a phone.
g1 camera
well i notice that no matter what program the g1 has its seems that the camera sux!!! is there any way that this can be fixed???
Try xROM.
It's a full rom, not an app.
But it has the Hero camera in it, and it works pretty good in dark light.
The Market does have some very nice camera apps (especially for a phone camera), but I fully understand the op's request. Sometimes it's not feasible to carry around a camera and a phone. For the candid, spur-of-the-moment shots, that's the benefit of having a camera on the phone. Unfortunately, most of these apps do post-processing of photos. That's not much fun when you take multiple photos. The Hero camera, on the otherhand, let's you set the brightness/contrast/etc BEFORE you take the pics. That's a huge benefit when you're in a restaurant or club and want to grab some low light photos.
xROM is a very nice, stable and fast rom. Although it's a bit older of a rom, it still has most of the functionality of the latest roms and pretty much all the speed as well. I believe it's the most recent rom that also had the Hero camera.
Thats why I'm hoping we get some software improvements once the Sony Ericsson phone comes out. I had the k800i Cybershot Phone before the G1, and that phone rocked. The camera software was amazing. I imagine the hardware will limit it of course, but the image processing right after the sensors output should see great improvements that, I hope because of android, will lead to amazing improvements of the camera apps.
I have Snap Photo Pro, FxCamera, and 3DCamera.
In my opinion...
Snap Photo is best for photos that matter the most (but its still not a real cameraphone so you can't expect much). But the detail is there and postediting can fix most issues. And you get the most megapixels compared to the rest.
FxCamera is awesome if you don't mind small photos. Web quality, but not print. Love this app though, and prefer the auto output of the polaroid mode better than auto Snap Photo settings, and use this one the most for casual shots.
Never had a photo from 3dCamera yet. Hoping its a skill level thing and I can make use of th incredible possibilities. But only possibilities so far.
I repeat, if a hero rom can use these features on a g1/dream phone, this mean that a stand alone software for g1 can do that, i think.
Why nobody has developed these features? What is the problem?
I totally agree! I just wish we had an app. in which nightmode actually worked...
is it just me but is FX camera missing from the market now? I havent been able to find it

CAMERA MOD for S6 [UPDATED 22 Dec] 5.1.1: Improved Quality; Removed Restrictions

CAMERA MOD FOR S6 EDGE G920F & G920I LOLLIPOP 5.1.1
YOUR DEVICE NEED ROOT ACCESS
THIS MOD IS ONLY FOR SAMSUNG TOUCHWIZ BASED ROM (STOCK/CUSTOM)
*****************************************
Many user reported that this Mod is not working, I don't have the device now, I have modded the camera from stock Rom, I am not sure if this Mod will work with any custom ROM.
Anyway, I will update the Mod again Once the Marshmallow is out.
*****************************************
PLEASE READ COMPLETE POST BEFORE POSTING ANY QUESTION​
CHANGE LIST:
IMAGE QUALITY:
• Increased to 100% for Normal Mode (Now you will get 100% quality, Uncompressed).
• Increased to 100% for Burst Mode.
VIDEO QUALITY:
Video Bitrate:
• UHD 4K (3840x2160) : Increased to 70Mbits from 48Mbits.
• FHD (1920x1080) [FRONT, BACK & DUAL-MODE CAMERA; FAST MOTION : 1/2, 1/4, 1/8] : Increased to 25Mbits from 17Mbits.
• FHD (1920x1080)@60FPS : Increased to 50Mbits from 28Mbits.
• WQHD (2560x1440) [FRONT & BACK CAMERA] : Increased to 40Mbits from 25Mbits.
• HD (1280x720) [FRONT, BACK & DUAL-MODE CAMERA] : Increased to 17Mbits from 12Mbits.
• SLOW MOTION (1/2): Increased to 17Mbits from 12Mbits.
• SLOW MOTION (1/4): Increased to 17Mbits from 12Mbits.
• SLOW MOTION (1/8): Increased to 8.5Mbits from 6Mbits.
VIDEO RECORDING TIME:
• Increased to 30:00 Minutes from 5:00 Minutes for WQHD and UHD. (Maximum upto 4GB = 8 Minutes : 09 Seconds)
• Increased to 30:00 Minutes from 10:00 Minutes for FHD_60FPS and DUAL_FHD.
• File Size Increased to 4 GB from 2GB for Slow motion and Fast Motion video recording.
SNAPSHOT RESTRICTION REMOVED:
• Now you can Take a Snapshot while recording UHD, WQHD and FHD_60FPS videos.
• While recording UHD & WQHD video, 15.9 MegaPixel (5312x2988) stills will be captured.
• While recording FHD_60FPS video, 2.0 MegaPixel (1920x1080) stills will be captured.
FLASH RESTRICTION REMOVED:
• Now you can use Flash even when the Battery is lower than 15%.
NOTE: If the battery is below 15%, then everytime you open Camera app, a Warning pop-up will appear "Flash is turned off to save battery (Below 15%). However you can turn on the flash manually." and the Flash will be Off every time you open the camera when battery below 15%, you have to manually change the Flash.
BATTERY LOW RESTRICTION REDUCED TO 1% FROM 5%:
• Now you can use Camera even if the battery is lower than 5%. (and Greater than 0%).
*********************************************
*** TAKE BACK UP OF EXISTING CAMERA APK AND XML FILE ***​
Steps for replacing Manually.
• Delete all the .odex [If Exist] files (SamsungCamera4.odex and SamsungCamera4.odex.art) present in "arm " folder (system/app/SamsungCamera4/arm).
• Replace SamsungCamera4.apk (system/app/SamsungCamera4) with the one provided in below attached .zip file, based on your device model.
• Replace media_profiles.xml (system/etc) with the one provided in below attached .zip file, based on your device model.
• Set Correct permissions:
• Folder Permission: 0755 [rwxr-xr-x]
• File permission: 0644 [rw-r--r--] for SamsungCamera4.apk and media_profiles.xml
• After replacing the files and setting correct permissions. Wipe Camera data from App Manager; Please go to recovery and wipe the cache then Reboot.​*********************************************
If you like this Mod; consider Hitting Thanks
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Button.​
Do you think thus will work on the S6 Edge for T-Mobile. Testing Now.
EDIT: Here is media profile.xml for Tmo S6 Edge https://mega.co.nz/#!Ex0CCYwa!znQsVNi5xj1CnLL7pUUZ-YoZp-bxh9H1Q78nwNuSgFU
Thanks for Reply.
ktetreault14 said:
Do you think thus will work on the S6 Edge for T-Mobile. Testing Now.
EDIT: Here is media profile.xml for Tmo S6 Edge https://mega.co.nz/#!Ex0CCYwa!znQsVNi5xj1CnLL7pUUZ-YoZp-bxh9H1Q78nwNuSgFU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't try it on S6 Edge.
I'll create new thread for S6 edge tomorrow or by day after tomorrow with Modded Camera.
amk19 said:
Please don't try it on S6 Edge.
I'll create new thread for S6 edge tomorrow or by day after tomorrow with Modded Camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wow thanks a bunch!!
So does this need root in order to be done?
this is samsungcamera3 or not?
could you please make a version on samsungcamera4 with multi DPI? =)
i changed my dpi to 480 and now the live-view is not in fullscreen :x
i could send you the samsungcamera4 from galaxy 5 edge =)
JoeFCaputo113 said:
So does this need root in order to be done?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
Does this work on sprint variant?
nflwideout86 said:
Does this work on sprint variant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should work, Give it a try,
@JoeFCaputo113 Yes, Root access is needed on your device.
@ktetreault14 I will update s6 edge camera Mod by tomorrow EOD. Sorry..
@Dr4g0n I am Sorry mate. I can't make it Multi DPI supportable.
It's SamsungCamera4.apk from Stock S6 Lollipop firmware.
amk19 said:
It should work, Give it a try,
@JoeFCaputo113 Yes, Root access is needed on your device.
@ktetreault14 I will update s6 edge camera Mod by tomorrow EOD. Sorry..
@Dr4g0n I am Sorry mate. I can't make it Multi DPI supportable.
It's SamsungCamera4.apk from Stock S6 Lollipop firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
works with no issues on latest stock german firmware G920FXXU1AOCV
zathus said:
Really?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, really. Nowhere in there is it stated. So instead of being snarky, you cuda gave a useful comment instead of wasting space.
JoeFCaputo113 said:
Yes, really. Nowhere in there is it stated. So instead of being snarky, you cuda gave a useful comment instead of wasting space.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In what world can a non rooted phone replace system apps and change permissions with out root? Common sense would have saved you not 1, but 2 posts of ignorance
zathus said:
In what world can a non rooted phone replace system apps and change permissions with out root? Common sense would have saved you not 1, but 2 posts of ignorance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look, I know the poster should have known root was required - and asking a second time showed how little he does know - but it really isn't necessary to get nasty - it breeds contempt and that is not an environment conducive for good things - you could have easily told him yes root was needed and briefly explained why he should have known without directly calling out his ignorance. That would have been implied in your answer without really saying it.
It isn't all that big of a deal - but one post of negativity leads to another and another and it just isn;t necessary - I am not wanting to get into big fight over this - just thought I would share my two cents.
mocsab said:
look, I know the poster should have known root was required - and asking a second time showed how little he does know - but it really isn't necessary to get nasty - it breeds contempt and that is not an environment conducive for good things - you could have easily told him yes root was needed and briefly explained why he should have known without directly calling out his ignorance. That would have been implied in your answer without really saying it.
It isn't all that big of a deal - but one post of negativity leads to another and another and it just isn;t necessary - I am not wanting to get into big fight over this - just thought I would share my two cents.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fare enough. It was just pretty obvious =) back on to the subject at hand. Nice to see a camera mod so quick. Exciting.
zathus said:
Fare enough. It was just pretty obvious =) back on to the subject at hand. Nice to see a camera mod so quick. Exciting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
absolutely - I ahve taken some amazing photos with this camera - I own a 13MB Sony DSLR with Telephoto - with the exception of the Telehpoto images I have taken with the sony - the close ups and macro type images I have taken with the S6 camera stand up to any I have taken with the Sony. AMAZING that such quality images can be taken with a camera on a cell phone. Pretty close to the Number 1 reason I bought this phone. (funny - I buy a phone for the camera ! - but the benefit is that I can make phone calls with it to, and a lot more.... - LOL)
thanks
JoeFCaputo113 said:
Yes, really. Nowhere in there is it stated. So instead of being snarky, you cuda gave a useful comment instead of wasting space.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried this mod? I wanted to see if someone else with a sprint gs6 has tried it successfully yet.
Works great at G920I, movistar branded from Chile. G920IDVU1AOC6
Thanks!
(photo file size increase almost to double, from 6 Mb to 11.5)
KqK said:
Works great at G920I, movistar branded from Chile. G920IDVU1AOC6
Thanks!
(photo file size increase almost to double, from 6 Mb to 11.5)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Examples please???
Couldnt flash it on the 920t
In the subject line it says "Removed RESTRICTIONS"
Are these the restriction below that applies for UHD, QHD and FHD (60fps)?
Features unavailable with UHD, QHD and FHD (60fps)
- HDR (rich tone)
- Video effects
- Video stabilisation
- Taking pictures while recoding video
- Tracking AF

Camera PX on the Pixel 3a

I thought of opening a thread for CStark's Camera PX specific for the Pixel 3a, for settings, samples, comparing photos and for those who might not know it
Here are some settings recommended:
MAX_hey said:
I am using the following settings on my 3a and PXv4.5. The result has been incredible. I always use it with the HDR+ Enhanced enabled.
ADVANCED:
HDR+ control: On
PX MOD SETTINGS:
Synthetic Fill Flash: Off
Disable Focus Tracking: Off
Disable Motion Photos: On
Non-ZSL Frame Count: Default
Maximum Zoom Level: Default
Super Res Zoom Always On: Yes
Force Sabre Merge: Off
DCI-P3 Color Space: On
Portrait HDR+ Enhanced: Off
AI AWB for ZSL: Off
AI AWB for HDR+ Enhanced: On
AI AWB for Night Sight: On
LIB PATCHER:
Tone Curve: On (with default and stock settings)
Shadows Point: 0.33 (Default)
Highlight Points: 0.33 (Default)
Shadows (Lower Curve Half): -6 (Shadows Stock)
Highlights (Upper Curve Half): 15 (Highlights Stock)
Force System Noise Model: Off
Disable Dehaze: Off
Sharpness: 0
Saturation: 1.5
Global Luma Denoise: 1.0 Default
Global Chroma Denoise: 1.0 Default
WAVELET LUMA DENOISE LEVELS
Level 1 (Fine Details): 0.375
Level 2 (Rough Surfaces): 0.375
Level 3 (Edges): 0.375
Level 4 (Smooth Surfaces): 0.5
WAVELET CHROMA (Low Frequency) DENOISE LEVELS
Level 1 (Fine Details): 0.375
Level 2 (Rough Surfaces): 0.375
Level 3 (Edges): 0.375
Level 4 (Smooth Surfaces): 0.5
WAVELET CHROMA (High Frequency) DENOISE LEVELS
Level 1 (Fine Details): 0.375
Level 2 (Rough Surfaces): 0.375
Level 3 (Edges): 0.375
Level 4 (Smooth Surfaces): 0.5
Is an adaptation of the settings that the @Gnaius posted here previously. Tell us how these settings work for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-> Do you have any other setting suggestions? Or any samples comparing Camera PX vs Stock Google Camera?
C'mon guys, anyone?
Using PXv4.3, but they should be quite similar.
Here are some of my settings:
Face shape correction disabled
Synthetic fill flash disabled
Super res always on disabled
Force sabre off
AI AWB on for everything (all 3 modes)
Lib patcher enabled
Global luma denoise 0.75
Tone curve on
Shadows -2
Highlights 17
The rest are mostly set to their defaults.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Now testing PXv8.1 and quite pleased with the results so far.
Only change from default is 'Google AWB' always on.
I personally prefer AI AWB as I care more about skin tones and "memory colours" than actual colour temperature.
Mefiboshet said:
I personally prefer AI AWB as I care more about skin tones and "memory colours" than actual colour temperature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you say "AI awb off" is more accurate to reality? Interesting...
Tomar777 said:
So you say "AI awb off" is more accurate to reality? Interesting...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not always, but often.
Actual colour temperature is usually somewhere in the middle.
I wish there was an option to control "AI AWB amount" rather than it just being an on/off switch.
What the AI is doing (for instance) is "thinking": This is a wall, walls are white, I'll adjust the white balance to match that.
In reality, some walls are actually yellow...
I leave it on because I found that it's very good at cancelling unflattering colour casts from artificial light sources such as orange'ish street lights.
The end result may be a less faithful recreation of the actual scene, but a better looking photo that is more similar to how we remember it, as our brain also has a tendency to subliminally "cancel" such colour casts in retrospect.
Tomar777 said:
I thought of opening a thread for CStark's Camera PX specific for the Pixel 3a, for settings, samples, comparing photos and for those who might not know it
Here are some settings recommended:
-> Do you have any other setting suggestions? Or any samples comparing Camera PX vs Stock Google Camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HDR enhanced always on needs still fotos which is not common always , if there is motion in what you capture results are blurry
casabel said:
HDR enhanced always on needs still fotos which is not common always , if there is motion in what you capture results are blurry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What Max_hay suggests is HDR+ Control to be set on "ON" so you can switch it off whenever you like.
If this setting is on "OFF" HDR+ stays on all the time
Tomar777 said:
What Max_hay suggests is HDR+ Control to be set on "ON" so you can switch it off whenever you like.
If this setting is on "OFF" HDR+ stays on all the time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you for the clarification
Cstark has stopped developing his Pixel GCam but we have some news:
S4turno said:
New update from MWP:
- Gcam_8.2.204_V1.1_MWP
Changes:
1. Enable face detection
2. Enable focus tracking on video mode ( Thanks cstrak27 )
3. Added JPG quality options ( Thanks PZD )
4. Added DCI-P3 color gamut options
5. Added Pixel 5 AWB ( Thanks Arnova8G2 & Rakin )
6. Added new paramenter on Rampatcher
7. Reduce saturation on my xHDR lib by default
8. Removed Dynamic depth options ( still unstable ), use the "HDR style / model" instead
---
Nikita also released a new update and it mentions Pixels ("Optimized GCam for Google Pixel devices").
I don't know how well it works and it's based on GCam 8.1 (not 8.2, like MWP's), but here's the link in case someone wants to test:
- NGCam_8.1.101-v1.2-fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In MWP's GCam there are many parameters under "advanced" .
Interesting settings:
HDR+ style/model,
Ram Patcher,
MWP custom Lib HDR lib (red color),
Custom AWB,
Astro max exposure time
Will work a bit with this one, any setup recommendations are welcome.
New version from MWP Gcam_8.2.204_v1.2_MWP.apk
Google Camera 8.2.204 Mod V1.2 by MWP
==============================
20-07-2021
Changelog from previous version :
1. Enable camera sound switch for pixel JPN region ( thanks cstark27 )
2. Fixing Pixel RGB calibration on custom AWB
3. Added some new AWB
On Pixel 3a running LineageOS 18.1, switching to Portrait mode using the rear-facing camera crashes the camera app.

Question White dots appearing in long exposure shots on Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (S-30, ISO-6400)

Need help to fix this issue with long exposure shots on my Redmi Note 10 Pro Max. I recently bought the phone and today when I tested long exposure shots it showed white dots in all the pics with same settings, higher the ISO, more clearly the dots were visible.
What can I do to fix this issue?
I attached 2 shots below that I took in complete dark room after cleaning my lens carefully, and for extra precaution I point the camera towards a black surface closely. These are clicked with "Wide" camera in pro mode with Shutter Speed : 30 and ISO : 6400, when I reduce the ISO, they dots fade away a bit. Ultra Wide camera produces similar results.
I even downloaded ProShot app to check if it does any good but, same dots at same place were visible.
These 2 are taken by system camera app, using above given setting (S-30, ISO-6400)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sniper God said:
Need help to fix this issue with long exposure shots on my Redmi Note 10 Pro Max. I recently bought the phone and today when I tested long exposure shots it showed white dots in all the pics with same settings, higher the ISO, more clearly the dots were visible.
What can I do to fix this issue?
I attached 2 shots below that I took in complete dark room after cleaning my lens carefully, and for extra precaution I point the camera towards a black surface closely. These are clicked with "Wide" camera in pro mode with Shutter Speed : 30 and ISO : 6400, when I reduce the ISO, they dots fade away a bit. Ultra Wide camera produces similar results.
I even downloaded ProShot app to check if it does any good but, same dots at same place were visible.
These 2 are taken by system camera app, using above given setting (S-30, ISO-6400)
View attachment 5534839View attachment 5534837
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which ROM and which cam?
ROM : MIUI Global 12.5.10 Stable and Camera : 108 MP, 5 MP, 8 MP, 2 MP and in depth details added as attachment.
Ping for @Laptapper
Mentioned the device details in the above reply.
That's hot pixels and/or noise. That's pretty much normal on any digital camera, especially on longer exposures and higher ISO. How much they're shown in the final image depends on noise reduction used - the less (less aggressive) noise reduction, the more they will be visible.
@Case_
Firstly thanks for helping out! And got what you're saying, so just wanted to know in my case, as I am on an android device, what measures can I use to fix this? Any third party app that'll process images with more noise reduction? Or maybe any way to change default settings of system camera app? Can't always switch to post editing to fix this, as it'll be tricky too.
@Sniper God I would start by not shooting 30 second ISO 6400 shots That can be a tall order even for a DSLR, let alone for a phone camera.
GCam ports have noise profile and noise reduction adjustments if you're willing to tinker. I think I saw a hot pixel removal setting there too. Also I've used the mobile Photoshop before for noise reduction. Other than that, I only ever use Snapseed for some light photo editing, but it doesn't have noise reduction (or I don't think it does, at least).
But yeah, as silly as the advice to not shoot shots like that might seem, that's honestly one of the best advices in photography in general - if your camera has some shortcomings, either take advantage of them and use them to improve the shots (which in this case is kinda hard), or work around them so the affect your shots as little as possible.
Case_ said:
@Sniper God I would start by not shooting 30 second ISO 6400 shots That can be a tall order even for a DSLR, let alone for a phone camera.
GCam ports have noise profile and noise reduction adjustments if you're willing to tinker. I think I saw a hot pixel removal setting there too. Also I've used the mobile Photoshop before for noise reduction. Other than that, I only ever use Snapseed for some light photo editing, but it doesn't have noise reduction (or I don't think it does, at least).
But yeah, as silly as the advice to not shoot shots like that might seem, that's honestly one of the best advices in photography in general - if your camera has some shortcomings, either take advantage of them and use them to improve the shots (which in this case is kinda hard), or work around them so the affect your shots as little as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got it, but I've been trying to shoot with nearly same settings using different phones, and none of them reflected any issue like this. I think I should try resetting the phone or otherwise get to the service center as it is under warranty period. It even does this with inbuilt long exposure shot settings that are made to shoot stars and light painting.
It all depends on noise reduction algorithms and settings used. Many phone cameras are pretty aggressive in that regard, so things like these will rarely show up. Though it can also differ literally sensor from sensor, even on a same phone model, to a degree at least.
It is also IMO more likely to show up using settings made for astrophotography, because those are likely to have the noise reduction set pretty low to make sure it doesn't remove too many stars and smudge the sky too much.
I would seriously doubt a factory reset will change anything. But, I mean, you've got little to lose by trying that. And returning the phone is certainly your customer right if you're not satisfied with it.
BTW, out of curiosity, I just tried it on my phone. I got roughly the same amount of hot pixels as you did. Which, frankly, is impressively low for a phone camera as far as I'm concerned I'm pretty sure I'd get the same or more if I shot a 30s ISO 6400 exposure with my DSLR. I don't normally even use ISO 6400, I even try to use ISO 3200 as a last resort.

Categories

Resources