Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The linpack mflops looks great. I get 11 on a tweaked out 2.6.29 @800mhz
The quadrant isn't amazing but I think its at least an improvement over the stock 2.6.29 kernel. I get 1800-1900 running my latest test kernel @ 800mhz on Gingerbread(quadrant typically scores less in Gingerbread than Froyo unlike other benchmarks)
Looks like 2.6.32 has some potential.
Holy crap....
This is going to be great once we get kernel source and can undervolt/overlcock this sucka
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
notinterested said:
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
dsf3g said:
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
s52m3 said:
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Masterface7 said:
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
dalingrin said:
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found the exact opposite to be true. I go to a site that has videos not optimized for mobile and on CM7 they are simply not watchable. With the 1.2 flash its not perfect but certainly better than it is in CM7. Which is surprising because when im on CM7 i run 1100MHZ compared to the 800 with the 1.2 flash.
Anyone else have linpack scores on 1.2 they can post?
Linpack score sux
davidukfl said:
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
LINKPACK
score is 6.056 mflops, in 13.84 seconds, normal resolution 5.68, set cpu 925 mhz max/min running cyanogen 7.0.3 will all processes closed.
QUADRANT STANDARD
score is avg roughly 900 and i'm getting anywhere from 3 to 38 fps.
i've owned n1, m.droid, evo and now dinc that all ran cyanogen and never saw such low scores. i don't know if this nook color is just a little premature or that i'm putting too much emphasis on these scores but i believe there's a 2 ghz tablet around the corner with more horsepower. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why did you bump this just to scatter crap?
Running CM7 and OC, I'm hitting quad scores of 2400-3000
Try messing with the NC more before you write it off.
I also agree...
If you are getting scores that low, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I am operating on the CM 7.0.3 and have the thing OC'd at 1300.
I get consistent scores in the 2500 - 2900 range...
Lego
Related
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
CM7 Quadrant Error
duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine gets an "internal error" on "CPU Video Decoding." So, nothing yet.
duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Score is kind of low. I got a 1164 I am running Nookie Froyo with a 1.1Ghz kernel.
Is honeycomb significantly faster?
It appears it gets hung for a second on Video and Audio decoding. My Motorola Droid is running Project Elite V5.2 overclocked at 1.1Ghz and it scores a 1832 quadrant score.
Roughly 1,050-1,100 on Autonooter 3.0 @1GHz.
My OG Droid on CM7 #13 gets 881 @800MHz. But it FEELS faster. It's odd that the NC doesn't see the immediate performance improvements brought on with Froyo like phones did. Maybe the ROM's just aren't as developed so intensely. Hopefully someone running CM7 for NC can chime in so we can compare.
duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same configuration running off a Class 6 SDCard gets me ~1200 (just under the Droid X on the comparison screen). I thought this was great until I saw your score...
On CM7 Nightly v14 with CWM 3.0.1.0....
Quadrant testing died when it got to H.264 decoding. No DSP video yet.
I can't even get it to run on Stock rooted. After I click yet after the test it just gets a service error and shows black screen.
Reneg4d3 said:
My Score is kind of low. I got a 1164 I am running Nookie Froyo with a 1.1Ghz kernel.
Is honeycomb significantly faster?
It appears it gets hung for a second on Video and Audio decoding. My Motorola Droid is running Project Elite V5.2 overclocked at 1.1Ghz and it scores a 1832 quadrant score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something that has stuck me as odd, since i remember earlier Froyo builds that i ran getting well into 1600-1800+.. but like yours mine right now only gets ~1200..
Wow, dont know why you all are getting such low numbers, running HC v4 off EMMC I am getting 1800+ almost every time. Any insight on this?
benchmarks are just numbers, don't worry about your quadrant scores. worry on real world performance
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I 've just got a 2613 with Cyanogen 7 overclocked to 1.2.
1511 running off internal memory with CM7 Nightly 55 at 925Mhz
Quadrant is seriously flawed
I get anywhere from 3200 ~ 3700+ on my stock unrooted SGS 2
cm7 7.0.2 925mhz on SD card anywhere between 1600-1800
Sorry if this had been discussed somewhere else but what kernels, roms, or settings using set cpu or voltage control or whatever should i use to get the 2000+ quadrant score ive been dreaming of... The best i got was 1895.. Im on RYAN OCLF and i overlocked it to 1.2 ghz... Im on stock 2.2 and on the voodoo kernel.. Please post your scores and combinations so i can try them all :-D
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
My best: 2520
Deodexed JVK 2.3.3, CF-Root-XX_OXA_JVK-v3.1-CWM3RFS
Tweaks: RAM,SD,I/O,Kernel,VM,Media,Touchscreen
/system ext4/dbdata ext4/data ext4/cache ext4
no OC/UV
And if you are dreaming of quadrant score, then you are in trouble
Dont want to sound like a noob but i really dont get what u wrote here can u bare with me and explain?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Basically to get a better score as you have now is to install gingerbread(stock is fine, doesnt have to be deodexed) rom + CF root kernel. Enable its tweaks in the Tweak app. Convert to ext4. Thats it. Before you do , you know the drill. Backup, unlagfix, and you have been warned, when you mess up its on you
The corresponding links to these parts are in my signature first row I think
Please. Quad scores are pointless.
For example : a drag car can hit 250 MPH in 6 seconds, but its not very useful for taking the kids to school.
The only value of quad etc scores is to measure the effect of changes/ mods to your own device. If quad scores were important we would all own LG optimus 2s, wouldn't we?
The real test is how long you can run dungeon defenders before your phone melts!
Oh btw my best quad score was 2300 ish running MIUI RC4 overclocked and undervolted. I could have increased the score by forcing the CPU to run at 1.3 ghz all the time, changing the governor settings, closing all apps and services and blasting nitrous oxide through the air intake but I didn't bother.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Overlocked and undervolted to how much ?
I got the idea but it's nice to have the highest score among my friends
You can easily get over 3000 with an ext2 loopback ontop of ext4 plus an overclock. But that's beside the point.
What matters is how it feels and performs day to day, that's more personal opinion. Quadrant is virtually useless IMO.
If you want a "true" quadrant score for what the Galaxy S is capable of without cheating/overclocking, you're probably looking at between 1600-1800 depending on ROM and filesystem.
If you are doing this just to impress your friends...well I don't know who that reflects badly upon, you, your friends, or both. Seriously, give it up, or just resort to comparing d!ck size.
These 2000+ quadrant scores are obtained by abusing the way the thing is tested; changing the file system and setting a loop fools the program into thinking the phone is faster than it is. There are people who've hit quadrant scores of 5000+ just by messing with this filesystem thing, with no real performance difference.
In short: Don't bother with it.
Quadrant Score isnt representatove point performance
This My HTC HD2 with my build adreno2D3D driver project but its just little boost on real graphic performance and with quadrant it will show this so not only I/O partically error benchmark
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How many examples do we need that Quadrant is not very accurate/useful
All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.
3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.
Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.
ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.
itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
AnTuTu
Quadrant
More recent
this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...
Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !
highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.
here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Equinox_br said:
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before something changed I was able to get 3400 with 1Ghz and vorkkernel
So, this means that my score is bad?
What can I do to make it better?
Stock phone I was scoring like 2700, Volkernel 1Ghz like 2900 and now at 1.4Ghz with 3900.
Stock Galaxy S II scores something like 3200 if I remember.
Maybe you were running 1.1.6 version of Quadrant no?
that just score, and in benchmark, you will not see difference between 3000 and 3400 when you use it. the best combination is, when you feel a very big woow.
i got that feel with latest GO Launcher EX, and stock v10D with latest neoblaze [email protected] ext4, i removed cardock or what, and now i see a very very big difference with a very good standby time.
very fast scrolls in browser, gallery, and settings and launcher, install apps 5x faster, take shot 2x faster with camera, and the speed in browser is extremly fast. it boots much faster, you can try init.d tweaks for memory management.
and now... you can spend your time with make your homescreen, or skin nicer and nicer, and then share with us
With topogigi v1.7, OC at 1,4GHz got 4110 in quadrant!
At 1GHz was 3231
Edit with v1.9 +SP1 & HP kernel RC1 @1,4GHz "4416"
Custom kernels support "epeen enlargment".
Thats a different aproach to how sql database writes which doesnt make difference in speed in real use but makes a huge diference in benchmarks.
Where you see "sql hack" avoid it. No real advantage and it could be a potentcial data loss.
So there is a big part of the change
Wow...Reading this I feel like I still have to learn a lot about Android developments! hehe
In general I'm very satisfied with my phone, its fast, stable, never had an error.
I'll see if I can touch the 4000 score without increase processor speed, any tip?
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
Edit:
Guys, my 3g network was bad and I tried to restart my phone, when initializing he froze on LG logo (second one). I tried to replace the Kernel and had no success, so I had to reinstall CM7!! And the phone worked....I think that the problem was a Vorkernel update that I made by a program called Vorkernel update inside the OS!
Now I'm using the stock kernel from CM7 till get home at least. I ran Quadrant again and got 3143 point @1.0Ghz! That is a lot! hehe
Leaked GB 2.3.4
1.4ghz NeoBlaze ROM
Quadrant 1.1.7
2760 score. My phone is broken
Ah.. 3182 now, overclocking program wasn't working!
3658 run two...
3710 run 3.. nice.
Restored phone, went to Topogigi 1.9, 1.4ghz still, now getting around 4600... much better.
Topogigi 1.8 sp1
1,4Ghz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Topogigi's 1.9...
justclimb said:
Topogigi's 1.9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to download..:-( :-(
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
indyjones83 said:
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4586 for me ;-)
2541 At stock looks like a bad score to me :/
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Striatum_bdr said:
4586 for me ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While we're having a pissing contest...
Mungulz said:
While we're having a pissing contest...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, in Topogigi's thread a guy showed a nearly 5000 screenshot with some tweaks of his own..
It's probably good to remind that tweaking a ROM to have better scores in benchmarks doesn't mean a better user experience in practical use.
When you know which tests are made by the benchmark app, you can optimize the dedicated part of code in ROM to have better results, it dosn't mean the entire ROM will be snappier. The most famous is sqlite optimizations as all benchmarks use sqlite tests...
So it can give a good idea but it's not the Holy Bible...
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Soulj4h said:
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine on stock 2350-2600
So dont worry
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
I'm thinking if I should install the neoblaze kernel on stock
You should, if you have spare batteries
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
I just updated like 2 hours ago, installed a few apps got root and twrp on it.
Installed antutu just to check the score and wow a score i got with encrypted on.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My score on 5.0.1 was 43k which i thought was ok but this new score with many apps installed and 10+ in recent was not bad at all.
What a snappy beast i got, much better then what i got when it was released!
thats a normal score on a nexus 6, 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, or 5.1. it hasnt changed. your score of 43000 was just a very low score to begin with.
simms22 said:
thats a normal score on a nexus 6, 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, or 5.1. it hasnt changed. your score of 43000 was just a very low score to begin with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well 43k was my score when i brought the device with 5.0 on it.
To me this is a huge step forward, also the performance of the device is much better now.
Android-Desire said:
Well 43k was my score when i brought the device with 5.0 on it.
To me this is a huge step forward, also the performance of the device is much better now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was seeing 53000+ on 5.0, stock. your 43000 score was a very very low nexus 6 score. 53000+ is the normal score for a nexus 6, regardless of what your score was before. i bet it was so low because youre benchmarking it wrong. if your cpu is set to max cpu speed and min cpu speed, then thats the wrong way to bench. as your phone then decides what speed itll use. youre supposed to set your cpu speed for max cpu/max cpu, so it only tests your max cpu speed, so it will only give you your highest scores. otherwise, you have no idea what cpu speed its actually testing. obviously 43000 it wasnt testing your max cpu speed.
simms22 said:
i was seeing 53000+ on 5.0, stock. your 43000 score was a very very low nexus 6 score. 53000+ is the normal score for a nexus 6, regardless of what your score was before. i bet it was so low because youre benchmarking it wrong. if your cpu is set to max cpu speed and min cpu speed, then thats the wrong way to bench. as your phone then decides what speed itll use. youre supposed to set your cpu speed for max cpu/max cpu, so it only tests your max cpu speed, so it will only give you your highest scores. otherwise, you have no idea what cpu speed its actually testing. obviously 43000 it wasnt testing your max cpu speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
43k was stock without any modifications to cpu kernel or anything that should interfer with the benchmark, same as this screenie. stock settings all the way.
Why is it everytime i post something here that all people take it like this is my first time using an android phone? I have build roms before - 2.3.4 on HTC Desire - 2.3.4 on LG Optimus 2x and a cupcake 1.5 rom for a huawei and i have also build 5.0 aosp for this Nexus 6.
My experience with this device at 43k was when i was omw home with only antutu installed on phone and not even connected it to pc yet.
I think what he is saying is other people, like myself, got in the fifties with a standard stock 5. 0 device.
If it really was a per device issue then I would think I would get in the sixties on 5.1 , but I don't think that's going to happen. i. e. you going from 5 .0 to 5. 1 did not jump your stats up by 10k.
But I am glad to hear it resolved your issues.
Sent from my Nexus 6
Android-Desire said:
43k was stock without any modifications to cpu kernel or anything that should interfer with the benchmark, same as this screenie. stock settings all the way.
Why is it everytime i post something here that all people take it like this is my first time using an android phone? I have build roms before - 2.3.4 on HTC Desire - 2.3.4 on LG Optimus 2x and a cupcake 1.5 rom for a huawei and i have also build 5.0 aosp for this Nexus 6.
My experience with this device at 43k was when i was omw home with only antutu installed on phone and not even connected it to pc yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, you were doing something wrong then, whatever it was. 43000 is a nexus 5 antutu score, lol. btw, me, and everyone i know with a nexus 6 hit 53000+ on stock, while still stock. btw, just because you can build a rom, doesnt mean that you know everything android, as simple noobs can build aosp from source, and add things to it.
43k is low. I normally get around 55k.
I've had 34k before that was because the battery was low and limiting the cpu speed.
Not sure how a discussion of Nationality started in a phone benchmark thread? Either way, it is unneeded and removed. Please stop.
Back to talking about meaningless numbers now....
Simm is correct - 53k is average for stock unrooted.
I can get this on my wife's phone all day without trying.
Mine did the reverse. On 5.01 I was at 53k. On 5.1 I am at 36k.
El Daddy said:
Not sure how a discussion of Nationality started in a phone benchmark thread? Either way, it is unneeded and removed. Please stop.
Back to talking about meaningless numbers now....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause that is how they are always.
You must be able to see it from his post, he is assuming this is my first time with technology, and talking down to me like i have lived in a cave somewhere and got this created account date by accident.
Just to add a bit of confirmation (on one side) to this thread, I never got into the 50s on my stock nexus 6 until I removed encryption from the device and switched kernels. My values were consistent with what has been posted. I'm not sure how you can run Antutu wrong on a stock, unrooted, and locked bootloader device, unless you're running it while it's charging or when the battery is dead. I did neither and was scoring in the mid 40s.
For some reason I'm getting scores of around 44,000 in stock 5.1 (rooted). Prior to flashing 5.1 I was getting around 52,000. Antutu's 3D tests aren't looking as smooth as they were before, either.
This is with stock 5.1 kernel.
Edit: OK, how silly of me. Now that I've actually tested it on a fuller battery I'm getting low 50s again.