Database Develop

tegrak overclock

Not sure if this is for real but it seems to work, available on android market.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

uslacson1 said:
Not sure if this is for real but it seems to work, available on android market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Attached screen shot.

Thought id check this out just to see what happens. It actually does appear to overclock and make real changes phone seems much snappier like it was with eclair and my voodoo over clock kernel then i thought i perform a quadrant. Some serious increases in framerates after setting overclock to 1.3 gigaouches. And has a much higher score, seems to transfer to real world performance.
Here is a before and after screen shot one at stock 1 gighertz voodoo
The next at 1.3 gigeherts voodoo. Both superclean 2.9.2 ec10 kernel.
I also added a widget to my sccreen to see if it really does say its at 1.3 gigaherts and it does. Phone seems stable and not acting weird at all. Will probably keep using

dalrym05 said:
Thought id check this out just to see what happens. It actually does appear to overclock and make real changes phone seems much snappier like it was with eclair and my voodoo over clock kernel then i thought i perform a quadrant. Some serious increases in framerates after setting overclock to 1.3 gigaouches. And has a much higher score, seems to transfer to real world performance.
Here is a before and after screen shot one at stock 1 gighertz voodoo
The next at 1.3 gigeherts voodoo. Both superclean 2.9.2 ec10 kernel.
I also added a widget to my sccreen to see if it really does say its at 1.3 gigaherts and it does. Phone seems stable and not acting weird at all. Will probably keep using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freezes neocore and nfs at 1.3, more stable for me at 1.25
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App

This app appears to just module overclock similar to.what.the droid x/milestone does
its neat but not ideal
for those that care about oc...true 2.2 kernels im sure can be pushed farther than this and 2.1....1.4 appears stable on other sgs variants

This would probably suffice until some real optimzed OCed 2.2 kernels start coming out.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App

I have been using this at 1.3 all day and all is good. Nice substitute untilled some good kernels come out although this feels just as speedy as eclair. No complaints here at all. Deffinately a nice find. I can't believe I haven't herd about this sooner.

Lol i talked to the developer of this and told him about the froyo source for fascinate/mesmerize and he said he didnt know fascinates source was out already,he said i was the first one requesting him an sch i500 compatibility
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App

So with jt's latest kernel, is this app still useful? Or was it something fit to use until the custom kernels started coming out?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App

PeterGunz said:
So with jt's latest kernel, is this app still useful? Or was it something fit to use until the custom kernels started coming out?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jt no longer overclocks his kernels and hasn't for a longtime....so for those that want overclocks this is the only way until someone puts out an oc kernel

nitsuj17 said:
Jt no longer overclocks his kernels and hasn't for a longtime....so for those that want overclocks this is the only way until someone puts out an oc kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What he said. I like this app though even though mine works great all the way up. For someone who can't run that fast if the phone were to lock. When it reboots its back to stock. Fail safe. Not a pain to reactivate either.

This makes me cautious for some reason...

SC 2.9.2/ EC10 Voodoo+Sound/ NitroHoney v3.1.1/ [email protected] 1.1
Almost 16 hours, stable and fast!
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App

jenisiz said:
This makes me cautious for some reason...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What makes you cautious? Before any hardware gets messed up the phone will lock up and/or reboot then you'll be at stock speeds again. Although I haven't had any issues.

Wow. Real noticeable difference here. easy to use. Tried the 1.3 but the phone would freeze. 1.25 did thee trick for me. It sets back to default after every boot too which is pretty cool.

jenisiz said:
This makes me cautious for some reason...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? Nothing to be scared of. I can vouch it works well my friend and not only is it zippy (on whatever setting u have it on), it also resets to default after each boot. No worries!

I know quadrents are so so and not accurate on performance, but I get higher readings on 1.5 rather than 2.0. Always score in 1900s on 1.5 and 1600 on 2.0.

actually don't like this feature...
farewell_goodbye2u said:
Why? Nothing to be scared of. I can vouch it works well my friend and not only is it zippy (on whatever setting u have it on), it also resets to default after each boot. No worries!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
title says it all I noticed a nice difference in real world performance as well as every type of quadrant-like program you could use to score your speed but I wish that it would start on boot so if I need to restart my phone for whatever reason I don't have to go back in and reset everything.. really really want auto boot for this.

This is an interesting app...

GizmoDroid said:
This is an interesting app...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, you have proven to me time and time again to never believe screenshots of YOUR Quadrant scores! lol. J/k. I am going to check this out, hopefully with the same success as the rest of you.

Nook Color 1.2 Rooted - Quadrant and Linpack Scores

Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

The linpack mflops looks great. I get 11 on a tweaked out 2.6.29 @800mhz
The quadrant isn't amazing but I think its at least an improvement over the stock 2.6.29 kernel. I get 1800-1900 running my latest test kernel @ 800mhz on Gingerbread(quadrant typically scores less in Gingerbread than Froyo unlike other benchmarks)
Looks like 2.6.32 has some potential.

Holy crap....
This is going to be great once we get kernel source and can undervolt/overlcock this sucka

Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.

notinterested said:
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.

dsf3g said:
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.

s52m3 said:
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?

Masterface7 said:
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.

dalingrin said:
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found the exact opposite to be true. I go to a site that has videos not optimized for mobile and on CM7 they are simply not watchable. With the 1.2 flash its not perfect but certainly better than it is in CM7. Which is surprising because when im on CM7 i run 1100MHZ compared to the 800 with the 1.2 flash.

Anyone else have linpack scores on 1.2 they can post?

Linpack score sux
davidukfl said:
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
LINKPACK
score is 6.056 mflops, in 13.84 seconds, normal resolution 5.68, set cpu 925 mhz max/min running cyanogen 7.0.3 will all processes closed.
QUADRANT STANDARD
score is avg roughly 900 and i'm getting anywhere from 3 to 38 fps.
i've owned n1, m.droid, evo and now dinc that all ran cyanogen and never saw such low scores. i don't know if this nook color is just a little premature or that i'm putting too much emphasis on these scores but i believe there's a 2 ghz tablet around the corner with more horsepower. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Why did you bump this just to scatter crap?
Running CM7 and OC, I'm hitting quad scores of 2400-3000
Try messing with the NC more before you write it off.

I also agree...
If you are getting scores that low, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I am operating on the CM 7.0.3 and have the thing OC'd at 1300.
I get consistent scores in the 2500 - 2900 range...
Lego

Overclock and battery life +best rom

What clock frequencies are you guys using. I am running at 1ghz 59vsel and the battery life isn't as good as 550 mhz (I know it shouldn't be). What frequencies and vsels are you guys using and what's the battery life like.
Also what roms are you guys using. I'm on cyanogenmod7. I was on cronos gingerbread for a while but it doesmt seem to go on standby. Anyone help?
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

I'm running Bugless Beast (GPA 15 Beta) with a 1.25 ghz low voltage kernel + comp cache enabled. It's rare for me to need to plug in the phone more than once a day to charge. Just google Peter Alfonso. He not only develops the ROMs but the kernels as well. He's doing AOSP Gingerbread builds that I find to be superior to CM7.

Isn't Bugless Beast only for Droid? Because I think he might be asking about Milestone.

skadude66 said:
Isn't Bugless Beast only for Droid? Because I think he might be asking about Milestone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might be right.
Derp. Disregard my lack of reading comprehension skills.

M1d said:
You might be right.
Derp. Disregard my lack of reading comprehension skills.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sucks, I heard that Peter Alfonso's kernels are pretty beast at battery life.

chevyNo1 5.2, gb, best rom I have used, had bb for a while, cm6.2, droid mod. run at 900mhz, battery is good

Latest build of miui rom is very good. Good battery life. 1000 MHz with smartass governer.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Milestone using Tapatalk

Thanks for the help so far guys. I've found gingerbread roms rtather slow when it comes to gaming (probably because gingerbread has not been released officially to any sgx530 phones). The new froyo uk update is so damn fast. Its ultra smooth at 550mhz. Has anyone made a custom rom based on the new official 2.2 milestone update?
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

And where can I find the latest version of miui. The one I can see on google has that can't use wifi and mobile data at the same time
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

choudu1 said:
And where can I find the latest version of miui. The one I can see on google has that can't use wifi and mobile data at the same time
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forums.miuiandroid.com/showthread.php?6030-MIUI-1.5.6-Milestone-Deodexed-(Chinese)
http://forums.miuiandroid.com/showthread.php?6048-MIUI-1.5.6-Milestone-English-Pack-1b

Thanks
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

Whats the gaming and 3d performance like on miui? I want to play dungeon hunter and modern combat 2 on my milestone
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

Right now I'm running on 1GHz with 66vsel, but still battery life isn't good enough. I tried 59vsel like @choudu1, but phone is unstable and restarts every now and then.
I'm not sure if I need any more power since almost every game I've played runs smoothly and the phone is quite stable. The only games I can't run on decent framerate are Soul Reaver and Tekken 3 via PSX emulator psx4droid.

Running CM7 from 14.06 without problems.
Clocks:
800Mhz vsel 52
700Mhz vsel 44
600Mhz vsel 42
400Mhz vsel 35
250Mhz vsel 25
interactive governor
My battery can stand for two days with (my) normal use(few calls, few sms, some games, some internet using wi-fi, but not often). With heavy use it can stand for (almost) one day.

Post your bench!

All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.

3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.

Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.

ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.

itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium

AnTuTu
Quadrant

More recent

this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...

Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259

to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?

shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.

itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-

shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !

highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/

highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.

I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?

keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.

here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!

Galaxy Note beats Optimus 4x hd in quadrant :(

I guess the Tegra 3 isn't optimized for old 3d apps and benchmarks, as the 4x hd lost to a modded Galaxy Note...
Video here on youtube... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSUIg_mDE-Q&feature=player_embedded

Dont know if you get different results everytime you run this Quadrant test, but my 4x got 4746 points, better then One X....
Suppose its up to the phone, if it have a good day or a bad day

This occurs only when the update was made on v10b with V10a results 5000 and more!
ds7005
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

quadrant, shmadrant - synthetic benchmark's are not 100% real picture you will get using phone in life. never believed these ****-tests...

ch3 said:
quadrant, shmadrant - synthetic benchmark's are not 100% real picture you will get using phone in life. never believed these ****-tests...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, seems like its just bull****...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

Hendrickson said:
I guess the Tegra 3 isn't optimized for old 3d apps and benchmarks, as the 4x hd lost to a modded Galaxy Note...
Video here on youtube... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSUIg_mDE-Q&feature=player_embedded
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its no problem to get my quadrant scores hit 10.000 on o4x, and it looks amazing but all it does it use some faster memory which quadrant is not prepared for. (asus Prime can show 10.000+)
so forget testing and comparing models using quadrant, you can easily mod or change scores and especially when its about cpu changes in the kernel, there is alot of optimization and apps changing you can do to improve for a few 100 points more.
tweaking and making quadrant scores show some speedup might not be speedy at all.

AnTuTu is a better test, the Optimus 4x doubles the scores of the Note.
I wonder what LG did to make the phone slower in v10b firmware?

i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-42-25.png
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-48-06.png
same with op
whats wrong with my phone
v10a

meld said:
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-42-25.png
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-48-06.png
same with op
whats wrong with my phone
v10a
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange results you have there
V10B - Result in Screenshot

ch3 said:
Strange results you have there
V10B - Result in Screenshot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to update to v10b?
Anyone have same problem with v10a?
And btw i play Temple run and fruit ninja a bit laggy + stutter
Anyone have some problem?

meld said:
How to update to v10b?
Anyone have same problem with v10a?
And btw i play Temple run and fruit ninja a bit laggy + stutter
Anyone have some problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 10B Over The Air.
Temple Run / Fruit Ninja - no shuttering.

ch3 said:
I got 10B Over The Air.
Temple Run / Fruit Ninja - no shuttering.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pc suite?
I use that, but no notif and cant click software update
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1191477&stc=1&d=1342023053

Does it really matter guys ?
I own a Galaxy Note and certainly don't feel like gloating....to me it all depends upon whether you like your phone or not, these tests can be tweaked and maybe with custom roms and optimizations you can get a much better score.
That's just what I believe.

I own both phones, and the note feels faster. Yet the antutu benchmarks tells me its not. I think once we get root on the 4x hd and then custom roms with all the junk removed this phones going to be a beast. Maybe we need 4.1 jellybean to really take advantage of the 4 cores.

Hendrickson said:
I own both phones, and the note feels faster. Yet the antutu benchmarks tells me its not. I think once we get root on the 4x hd and then custom roms with all the junk removed this phones going to be a beast. Maybe we need 4.1 jellybean to really take advantage of the 4 cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get scores in the 3500 in Quadrant. The rest of the benchmarks however show consistent scores with a quadcore device. The phone itself feels very snapy so i find no issues with low scores in quadrant

score
quadrant result - 5073
phone is rooted

hello gentlemen,
I had the same issue.. first test - and only 3038... (unrooted, 10h, few days w/out reboot)
but after reboot and kill any batterystats, cpumetters, etc.. back to normality with 5167 -
Regards,

daniel.wro said:
hello gentlemen,
I had the same issue.. first test - and only 3038... (unrooted, 10h, few days w/out reboot)
---
but after reboot and kill any batterystats, cpumetters, etc.. back to normality with 5167 -
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should not be surprised, hopefully.
since android works this way, and o4x got alot of memory for hungry apps wanting to stay in memory and do alot of things.
thats why apps like taskkiller is very efficient to have installed and run automatically so you keep your unrebooted phone snappier all the time.
a few days without taskkiller and it might just get very slow if you open many different apps.
nothing special about that. it depends on the user not the phone.