Galaxy Note beats Optimus 4x hd in quadrant :( - LG Optimus 4X HD

I guess the Tegra 3 isn't optimized for old 3d apps and benchmarks, as the 4x hd lost to a modded Galaxy Note...
Video here on youtube... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSUIg_mDE-Q&feature=player_embedded

Dont know if you get different results everytime you run this Quadrant test, but my 4x got 4746 points, better then One X....
Suppose its up to the phone, if it have a good day or a bad day

This occurs only when the update was made on v10b with V10a results 5000 and more!
ds7005
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

quadrant, shmadrant - synthetic benchmark's are not 100% real picture you will get using phone in life. never believed these ****-tests...

ch3 said:
quadrant, shmadrant - synthetic benchmark's are not 100% real picture you will get using phone in life. never believed these ****-tests...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, seems like its just bull****...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

Hendrickson said:
I guess the Tegra 3 isn't optimized for old 3d apps and benchmarks, as the 4x hd lost to a modded Galaxy Note...
Video here on youtube... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSUIg_mDE-Q&feature=player_embedded
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its no problem to get my quadrant scores hit 10.000 on o4x, and it looks amazing but all it does it use some faster memory which quadrant is not prepared for. (asus Prime can show 10.000+)
so forget testing and comparing models using quadrant, you can easily mod or change scores and especially when its about cpu changes in the kernel, there is alot of optimization and apps changing you can do to improve for a few 100 points more.
tweaking and making quadrant scores show some speedup might not be speedy at all.

AnTuTu is a better test, the Optimus 4x doubles the scores of the Note.
I wonder what LG did to make the phone slower in v10b firmware?

i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-42-25.png
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-48-06.png
same with op
whats wrong with my phone
v10a

meld said:
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-42-25.png
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-48-06.png
same with op
whats wrong with my phone
v10a
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange results you have there
V10B - Result in Screenshot

ch3 said:
Strange results you have there
V10B - Result in Screenshot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to update to v10b?
Anyone have same problem with v10a?
And btw i play Temple run and fruit ninja a bit laggy + stutter
Anyone have some problem?

meld said:
How to update to v10b?
Anyone have same problem with v10a?
And btw i play Temple run and fruit ninja a bit laggy + stutter
Anyone have some problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 10B Over The Air.
Temple Run / Fruit Ninja - no shuttering.

ch3 said:
I got 10B Over The Air.
Temple Run / Fruit Ninja - no shuttering.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pc suite?
I use that, but no notif and cant click software update
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1191477&stc=1&d=1342023053

Does it really matter guys ?
I own a Galaxy Note and certainly don't feel like gloating....to me it all depends upon whether you like your phone or not, these tests can be tweaked and maybe with custom roms and optimizations you can get a much better score.
That's just what I believe.

I own both phones, and the note feels faster. Yet the antutu benchmarks tells me its not. I think once we get root on the 4x hd and then custom roms with all the junk removed this phones going to be a beast. Maybe we need 4.1 jellybean to really take advantage of the 4 cores.

Hendrickson said:
I own both phones, and the note feels faster. Yet the antutu benchmarks tells me its not. I think once we get root on the 4x hd and then custom roms with all the junk removed this phones going to be a beast. Maybe we need 4.1 jellybean to really take advantage of the 4 cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get scores in the 3500 in Quadrant. The rest of the benchmarks however show consistent scores with a quadcore device. The phone itself feels very snapy so i find no issues with low scores in quadrant

score
quadrant result - 5073
phone is rooted

hello gentlemen,
I had the same issue.. first test - and only 3038... (unrooted, 10h, few days w/out reboot)
but after reboot and kill any batterystats, cpumetters, etc.. back to normality with 5167 -
Regards,

daniel.wro said:
hello gentlemen,
I had the same issue.. first test - and only 3038... (unrooted, 10h, few days w/out reboot)
---
but after reboot and kill any batterystats, cpumetters, etc.. back to normality with 5167 -
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should not be surprised, hopefully.
since android works this way, and o4x got alot of memory for hungry apps wanting to stay in memory and do alot of things.
thats why apps like taskkiller is very efficient to have installed and run automatically so you keep your unrebooted phone snappier all the time.
a few days without taskkiller and it might just get very slow if you open many different apps.
nothing special about that. it depends on the user not the phone.

Related

Is this the MAX?

Quadrant reading on my SGS ..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Can go higher ..
Yes, much higher and who uses quadrant any more?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
racerboy3801 said:
Yes, much higher and who uses quadrant any more?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I ran quadrant earlier for ****s and giggles. I forgot I have it installed, I just like the animations.
Sent from me.
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
haloimplant said:
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMFAO
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Without the stagefright tweak you can go up to 1800 . Just need to run the test few times And hope for the best. Also you can go with the stagefright tweak to 2500
I just had to.
reminds me a bit on DPS posing in WoW,....
hamti007 said:
reminds me a bit on DPS posing in WoW,....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was a rogue, I just cared about crits^^
to be back on topic:
quadrant is not reliable
Tweaking is like DJing, more loops don't automatically make it a better song
theduckking said:
Tweaking is like DJing, more loops don't automatically make it a better song
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But lots of flange and delay does!
Besides this, what are the reliable ones?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Antutu and Neocore.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
haloimplant said:
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks... that made me laugh
greeny2010 said:
Besides this, what are the reliable ones?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reliable ones? Benchmarks only test a specific workload.. You aren't testing how fast applications run, you are testing how fast the benchmark runs. There doesn't have to be a direct correlation
Auzy said:
Reliable ones? Benchmarks only test a specific workload.. You aren't testing how fast applications run, you are testing how fast the benchmark runs. There doesn't have to be a direct correlation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there had been no correlation then benchmarks wouldn't have been used at all, that's not accurate.
You can easily get over 3000 with an ext2 loopback ontop of ext4 plus an overclock. But that's beside the point.
What matters is how it feels and performs day to day, that's more personal opinion. Quadrant is virtually useless IMO.
If you want a "true" quadrant score for what the Galaxy S is capable of without cheating/overclocking, you're probably looking at between 1600-1800 depending on ROM and filesystem.
joegamal said:
If there had been no correlation then benchmarks wouldn't have been used at all, that's not accurate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said there wasn't. But, benchmarks are useless unless you actually know what you are testing..
Case in point, you have 1 program that does lots of writing (barely any reading), and a benchmark program.
If you increase reading speed by 6%, but decrease writing speed by 5%, a benchmark which treats reading and writing equally will give you a better score. Unfortunately, your app will be slower though. Of course, an increase in both will lead to a faster score, but so can other circumstances.
Most benchmarks aren't useless to everyone. Only to MOST users. Developers on the other hand who understand the benchmark and what they are optimising for, maybe would find them more useful..
In-game benchmarks although are useful out of the box, because they test performance of a specific workload/benchmarks. Every time someone optimises their phone to run a generic benchmark though, a kitten dies.

Post your bench!

All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.
3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.
Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.
ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.

			
				
itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
AnTuTu
Quadrant
More recent
this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...
Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?

			
				
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !
highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.
here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!

Delete..........

Delete..........
Sounds awesome! I will try ASAP and report back.
Only "improvement" I can see, is increased FPS number in Quadrant benchmark 3D tests, but score and performance looks same for me... Those 3D tests run and look same as they did before...
Confirm working What nice gaming experience ever!
Tenhi said:
Only "improvement" I can see, is increased FPS number in Quadrant benchmark 3D tests, but score and performance looks same for me... Those 3D tests run and look same as they did before...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not for me. Without this i got 2800 at first test with this directly 3100-3200.
nice one, stumbled over that thread some minutes ago and was going to post it too... beat me to it eh?
anyways, same here, no errors, works great, just try riptide gp :>
OMG !
now i got 65 fps in the planet test !
score 2700 > 3200
Running morfic's extra UV kernel, quadrant up a little, but the difference with the planets is huge. Looks lovely!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Ok great but does anyone know what that file actually does? Ok, if you remove it you get better fps in a benchmark but maybe it screws up something else
bgdxv said:
Ok great but does anyone know what that file actually does? Ok, if you remove it you get better fps in a benchmark but maybe it screws up something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why he tells you to back it up
bgdxv said:
Ok great but does anyone know what that file actually does? Ok, if you remove it you get better fps in a benchmark but maybe it screws up something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to delete some other files and see what else speeds up!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
bedalus said:
I'm going to delete some other files and see what else speeds up!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
wow using trinity 144 my quadrant went from 4500 to 2700. oops!
Tenhi said:
Only "improvement" I can see, is increased FPS number in Quadrant benchmark 3D tests, but score and performance looks same for me... Those 3D tests run and look same as they did before...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it does make a difference in quadrant score. here is a quadrant at 1440/1440 ondemand, using the trinity kernel, with the file removed. first, its 200 points higher than normal. 2nd, check out the insane 3D score..
bedalus said:
I'm going to delete some other files and see what else speeds up!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol don't, there is a huge chance of braking something and having to reboot, also I hope you were joking, but in case you weren't:
I wasn't sure if deleting system32 helped that much so I just started pulling chips off the motherboard. Now it doesn't seem to be working at all?
Sent from my Nexus, fool
bedalus said:
I wasn't sure if deleting system32 helped that much so I just started pulling chips off the motherboard. Now it doesn't seem to be working at all?
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmmm weird, try pulling more chips off, they may be incompatible with the tweak.
WOW, it's cool for me!
Almost a year later and finally fixed Too bad lazy developer never just fixed quadrant in first place for NS
Got to luv XDA, much appreciated.
Does this only fix quadrant or does it actually help games also?
EDIT
tested
quadrant 3D bench finally works correctly. "Benchmark" is still **** though
Games performance ...its hard to tell since most games run smooth on NS
my gameloft FPS games seem slightly smoother but
would be able to tell if we could display fps while playing a game...lol fraps for android
Even though this does help in some cases its got to have some negative effects Elsewhere i mean you're removing what looks to be a system driver
someone with galaxy s phone with 2.3 should back up this file and upload here since galaxy s doesn't seem to have this problem with quadrant maybe just replacing file with Samsung driver will work also...idk

Quadrant 1.1.7 Score, post your config and results!

Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Equinox_br said:
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before something changed I was able to get 3400 with 1Ghz and vorkkernel
So, this means that my score is bad?
What can I do to make it better?
Stock phone I was scoring like 2700, Volkernel 1Ghz like 2900 and now at 1.4Ghz with 3900.
Stock Galaxy S II scores something like 3200 if I remember.
Maybe you were running 1.1.6 version of Quadrant no?
that just score, and in benchmark, you will not see difference between 3000 and 3400 when you use it. the best combination is, when you feel a very big woow.
i got that feel with latest GO Launcher EX, and stock v10D with latest neoblaze [email protected] ext4, i removed cardock or what, and now i see a very very big difference with a very good standby time.
very fast scrolls in browser, gallery, and settings and launcher, install apps 5x faster, take shot 2x faster with camera, and the speed in browser is extremly fast. it boots much faster, you can try init.d tweaks for memory management.
and now... you can spend your time with make your homescreen, or skin nicer and nicer, and then share with us
With topogigi v1.7, OC at 1,4GHz got 4110 in quadrant!
At 1GHz was 3231
Edit with v1.9 +SP1 & HP kernel RC1 @1,4GHz "4416"
Custom kernels support "epeen enlargment".
Thats a different aproach to how sql database writes which doesnt make difference in speed in real use but makes a huge diference in benchmarks.
Where you see "sql hack" avoid it. No real advantage and it could be a potentcial data loss.
So there is a big part of the change
Wow...Reading this I feel like I still have to learn a lot about Android developments! hehe
In general I'm very satisfied with my phone, its fast, stable, never had an error.
I'll see if I can touch the 4000 score without increase processor speed, any tip?
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
Edit:
Guys, my 3g network was bad and I tried to restart my phone, when initializing he froze on LG logo (second one). I tried to replace the Kernel and had no success, so I had to reinstall CM7!! And the phone worked....I think that the problem was a Vorkernel update that I made by a program called Vorkernel update inside the OS!
Now I'm using the stock kernel from CM7 till get home at least. I ran Quadrant again and got 3143 point @1.0Ghz! That is a lot! hehe
Leaked GB 2.3.4
1.4ghz NeoBlaze ROM
Quadrant 1.1.7
2760 score. My phone is broken
Ah.. 3182 now, overclocking program wasn't working!
3658 run two...
3710 run 3.. nice.
Restored phone, went to Topogigi 1.9, 1.4ghz still, now getting around 4600... much better.
Topogigi 1.8 sp1
1,4Ghz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Topogigi's 1.9...
justclimb said:
Topogigi's 1.9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to download..:-( :-(
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
indyjones83 said:
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4586 for me ;-)
2541 At stock looks like a bad score to me :/
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Striatum_bdr said:
4586 for me ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While we're having a pissing contest...
Mungulz said:
While we're having a pissing contest...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, in Topogigi's thread a guy showed a nearly 5000 screenshot with some tweaks of his own..
It's probably good to remind that tweaking a ROM to have better scores in benchmarks doesn't mean a better user experience in practical use.
When you know which tests are made by the benchmark app, you can optimize the dedicated part of code in ROM to have better results, it dosn't mean the entire ROM will be snappier. The most famous is sqlite optimizations as all benchmarks use sqlite tests...
So it can give a good idea but it's not the Holy Bible...
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Soulj4h said:
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine on stock 2350-2600
So dont worry
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
I'm thinking if I should install the neoblaze kernel on stock
You should, if you have spare batteries
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

Daily usage and Gaming performance issue (HELP)

Hi. First of all i search all the forum but couldnt find any solution. As i mentioned Daily usage and gaming became a burden for me. Frankly im suprised that choppy behavior. My brother has HTC m8 and we compared both devices and i lost all of the games
with HTC m8 there is no lag in games and scrolling and browsing the internet, but with note 5 gaming and scrolling is a big issue for me and im really dissappointed. Any help appreciated thanks.
CPUz information\
Samsung Exynos octa 7420
cores=8
big.LITTLE- HMP
Architecture 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 2.10ghz
4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.50ghz
revision. R1p0
Process 14 nm
Gpu renderer mali t760
DEVICE
AT&T
samsung. universal 7420
Hardware samsungexynos 7420
Total ram 3663
Available 734 Mb
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Edit :I also tried clear cache
Cant upload pıctures due to message limit . sorry for disturbance
no solutions ?
gezgin__ said:
no solutions ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download Game Tuner from Play Store by Samsung and on opening it'll prompt you to download gameservice on galaxy apps!
Choose Custom and configure your games like: Resolution: Low(720p) and fps: 60 and launch your games from the Game Tuner app. Should be better!
Fullmetal Jun said:
Download Game Tuner from Play Store by Samsung and on opening it'll prompt you to download gameservice on galaxy apps!
Choose Custom and configure your games like: Resolution: Low(720p) and fps: 60 and launch your games from the Game Tuner app. Should be better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you but still same not working properly. and i wonder isnt that device able to run high end games smoothly _
gezgin__ said:
Thank you but still same not working properly. and i wonder isnt that device able to run high end games smoothly _
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure your device is up to date. Try running antutu benchmark and compare your score! Something appears wrong with your device.
Exynos 7420 and its gpu run Real Racing 3 or Dead Effect 2 and other heavy games as smooth as it gets..
Fullmetal Jun said:
Make sure your device is up to date. Try running antutu benchmark and compare your score! Something appears wrong with your device.
Exynos 7420 and its gpu run Real Racing 3 or Dead Effect 2 and other heavy games as smooth as it gets..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will test and post here with screen shots. I already tested antutu at first day it was 76k then it dropped below 65k (second time)
gezgin__ said:
I will test and post here with screen shots. I already tested antutu at first day it was 76k then it dropped below 65k (second time)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested my device With;
3dmark
antutu
GFXopenGL
geekbench3
and uploaded pictures . thank you.
gezgin__ said:
I tested my device With;
3dmark
antutu
GFXopenGL
geekbench3
and uploaded pictures . thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that's a lot of testing Pretty sure the scores look normal although I don't know the last ones, but you can always compare.
I'm pretty sure it's the games you're playing. They're probably not yet optimized for the Note 5. Ask their developers!
Or I guess your gaming needs are too high for this phone! An iPhone 6S or a Nexus 9 might give you a better gaming experience although the Note 5 is still a fantastic gaming device!
Fullmetal Jun said:
Now that's a lot of testing Pretty sure the scores look normal although I don't know the last ones, but you can always compare.
I'm pretty sure it's the games you're playing. They're probably not yet optimized for the Note 5. Ask their developers!
Or I guess your gaming needs are too high for this phone! An iPhone 6S or a Nexus 9 might give you a better gaming experience although the Note 5 is still a fantastic gaming device!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well actually games like shark Evo or any stickman games Im often facing with frame skipping waiting for the 6.0 upgrade if not i will want refund. Thank you for your cooperation

Categories

Resources