[Q] Switching to the Vivid.... ideas? - HTC Vivid, Raider, Velocity

So i have the AT&T Galaxy S II right now. I want an LTE phone with a 4.5"+ screen...
the Vivid looks pretty nice.
Questions:
-Is the Vivid's bootloader locked or unlocked?
-Is Vivid going to get CM9 officially?
-Is the build quality good? Better than the Galaxy S II?
-Is the battery life as good as the GSII's?
-Is it worth going with the Vivid now, or should I wait for the Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket HD or the Sony Xperia Ion?
Thanks for the help!

Bootloader is unlockable via HTC dev site
I have owned the sgs2 aswell and the vivid is far more heavy but I feel like it is crafted better, however more breakable screen wise.
HTC has stated that the device will get ics first quarter 2012. So as long as we have willing devs we can get cm9, there are already a few working on it unofficially
Sent from my HTC Raider X710e using xda premium

I have the Vivid but I'm goin to be takin a look at the Ion when it comes out. 4.6 HD screen,12mp camera and LTE sounds good. I like the Vivid but I have a problem with gettin new phones when they are released.
Sent from my HTC Raider X710e using xda premium

Tbh anything over 4.3 just seems too much and SE has failed so hard in recent years I have a hard time believing they are gonna hit one out of the park.
The SGS2 was great for dev, now that the vivid is bootloader unlockable were gonna see some movement here. It's getting exciting.
Drew
Sent from my HTC Raider X710e using xda premium

<Removed>

I'd wait for the Ion.

Came from the skyrocket and I do not regret it at all. Vivid feels like a phone. Skyrocket feels like a toy. Vivid screen is better. Skyrocket is good also. Vivid battery is great for me on a Rom I'm working on. Skyrocket was only good on cm7 . Table will turn once we get cm7 or cm9. I'll have to give the Vivid the belt between the two.
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium

Coming from the SGS (the first one), I bought the SGSII only to return it for the Raider after two days. I never liked touchwiz (I used ADW launcher) it's to simple and not very friendly. The widgets suck and the UI is to iPhone, with its big color full icons that take way to much room. The lock screen sucks even on the SGSII, if you enable pin/password etc you loose the ability of notification on the lock screen and no notification led (unless you use bln and backlight keys), this was enough to push me away. I like the ability to see text, change tracks, see the weather all without unlocking the phone and still have it locked with a pattern. Yes i tried Widget locker and al though it worke it involved to many widgets and apps just to get what the Raider already has.
These are the few things i disliked about Samsung and they are still an issue with the SGSII, all in all the Raider in my opinion is the far superior phone despite what reviewers say, if Samsung made the touchwiz better and not stip everything that is android i would have sticked with the SGS.

I had the Captivate before this Vivid so i personally am blown away haha. I have two co-workers who have the skyrocket and they want my white vivid. I personally love both phones but i recommend the vivid especially if you are planning to do any rooting. As of now i get about 2 days battery life using RumRaider beta11 with fairly heavy use considering i sell phones. Like everyone has said the vivid is heavy and you can feel it but i have noticed i drop light phones more because its hard to feel when they are slipping. the vivid of course doesnt have the amazing samsung screen though which is to me the only downside. Im running 47mbps on my vivids LTE which so far none of my coworkers have got on there Skyrocket. HTC also i believe is a far better company. its all personal preference though when it comes down to it. Either way i don't think you will be disappointed.

twizz619 said:
I had the Captivate before this Vivid so i personally am blown away haha. I have two co-workers who have the skyrocket and they want my white vivid. I personally love both phones but i recommend the vivid especially if you are planning to do any rooting. As of now i get about 2 days battery life using RumRaider beta11 with fairly heavy use considering i sell phones. Like everyone has said the vivid is heavy and you can feel it but i have noticed i drop light phones more because its hard to feel when they are slipping. the vivid of course doesnt have the amazing samsung screen though which is to me the only downside. Im running 47mbps on my vivids LTE which so far none of my coworkers have got on there Skyrocket. HTC also i believe is a far better company. its all personal preference though when it comes down to it. Either way i don't think you will be disappointed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree 100%. But I can't see a different between screens eh
Sent from my HTC Raider X710e using xda premium

XAviierG said:
Agree 100%. But I can't see a different between screens eh
Sent from my HTC Raider X710e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I however can tell a difference. I've had my Vivid since I picked up mine and my wife's white Vivids from Frye's in Atlanta during their 80 dollar sale this past Sunday. Coming from the 800x480 resolution display of the Inspire, this is more, well, Vivid. To me, there is a BIG difference between the displays in the resolution department. Yes, the Samsungs have vibrant displays from the SuperAMOLED+. However, the resolution is only 800x480. The Vivid, on the other hand, has an equally beautiful qHD display. The resolution on these badboys is a healthy 960x540. The winner of best display, for me, is the 960x540 qHD display of the Vivid.
Sent from my HTC Vivid using XDA app

XAviierG said:
Agree 100%. But I can't see a different between screens eh
Sent from my HTC Raider X710e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly xD its not much of a difference but samsung i believe is the only phones with AMOLED screens which gives a nice liquid color but HTC did such a great visual job that the difference is hard to see. I think its just cause i work with phones all day i can see it haha

----FINAL----
I have decided to just wait and see what comes out in Q2 and maybe Q3. I happen to be insanly lucky and found a Nexus One in the street!
I will be using that until either:
1) I can find the owner (I wanna be a good person)
2) I find an awesome phone that I'm going to be satisfied with.​

There's also the Samsung note that is suppose to be insane. If u wanna check into that
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using XDA App

Don't forget HTC is rumored to be releasing the Elite/Congressional to AT&T this Spring. It should be announced next month at Mobile World Congress in Spain.
Sent from my HTC Vivid using XDA app

Related

Who is getting the HTC vivid or already has it?

I know I am
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
I might get it, still have to take a look at skyrocket
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
slimslim said:
I might get it, still have to take a look at skyrocket
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IMO as soon as you overclock the Vivid the Skyrocket doesn't have much point...
Seems like the only reason you might want it is because it's light and thin compared to the Vivid, but the Vivid sounds like a solid phone and reviews so far seem to like the materials.
I might get it too, it looks good.
I will most likely go for the Vivid, I've only owned iPhones and the Galaxy S (Captivate) always wanted to try an HTC, though the battery is larger in the skyrocket. Like was stated I'm sure it will be OCed to 1.5 or higher to match the skyrocket.
If the Skyrocket had better resolution, 480x800 is pretty low at 4.5" I'd go Skyrocket fore sure.
I'm at the at&t store now getting the HTC vivid
i'm vouching for HTC, great phones. I owned a sensation and fell in love with it
I am not i think its weird looking
Taking my Infuse back today
I had the OG SGS2, traded it in for the Infuse, and am going today to trade that one in for the Vivid. I'm hoping this is my last stop! This will be the first HTC android phone that I buy, but based on the quality of my old WM HTC phones, I'm looking forward to getting this one!
Just picked up mine about 15 mins ago and its looking pretty sweet so far. Can't wait for it be rooted and some custom roms.
got mine 2 hours now its very good and fast. cant wait to get rooted and overclocked to see what this baby can really do.
Picked mine up a few minutes ago as well. Love it so far. HTC makes very high quality devices
Has anyone picked up the white one? Curious how it looks in person.
Just got mine.
Coming out of a Tilt 2. What a change.
I got mine a few hours ago its a great device the one thing I noticed so far is the volume level its pretty low compared to the gsII varients besides that it beats out the skyrocket.
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
When will there be a vivid forum?
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
i know there is a thread on here to vote for which phone u want a forum for so if anybody hasn't already search and vote. Also i did notice that it is quiet. But im getting better download speeds than with my rooted Inspire which was 3mbs down and 1.6 up now im getting 6mbs down and 1.6 up with my vivid and im not even in a LTE network
Just picked mine up. I looked at the white one...not a fan. fun fun!
I got mine as well and man oh ma is LTE fast! Can't post screenshot yet cause its not rooted but I'm consistently getting high 20 mbs down and 12 mbs up! I'm in Dallas and this speed is ridiculous. Hopefully I'll get decent amount of battery life with this phone. Gave my wife the galaxy s2 with cm7.
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk
I am most likely gonna get one as well considering I keep getting Hardware issues with my Atrix 2 I just got. That and HTC is Quite a bit easier to root and s-off than Motorola as far as I remember. That and I also won't have to wait for unlocked bootloader which might take quite awhile. Only problem though is that I bought my Atrix 2 from Best Buy who for some odd reason are selling the HTC Vivid for 100 More than ATT is selling it at.

Samsung vs. HTC... Clear winner.

Lots of posts complaining about the latest Samsung devices, Galaxy SkyRocket & Galaxy Nexus.
I started out the month of November with both the HTC Vivid & the Galaxy SkyRocket. I kept the HTC Vivid for myself after a week of using both and this morning I received a shiny new Nexus.
ICS 4.0 seems buggy at best, and while there are some nice additions, they took too much away from the device. Search functions are crippled, no flash and inconsistent menu items make navigation a bit hard at times. Facebook is broken (menu again) and it will not function as a USB storage device, media profile only.
Once again, Samsung has disappointed and I feel great about keeping the HTC Vivid.
I don't think that's a fair comparison. ICS has not been created for either device.
While I do.agree I prefer the hardware of the vivid comparing Gingerbread with.Sence 3.0 overlay to a beta ICS without proper driver support doesn't really work
Drew
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
drewdatrip said:
I don't think that's a fair comparison. ICS has not been created for either device.
While I do.agree I prefer the hardware of the vivid comparing Gingerbread with.Sence 3.0 overlay to a beta ICS without proper driver support doesn't really work
Drew
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He said he got a nexus. ICS has most certainly been created for the nexus... Specifically for the nexus.
Sent from my HTC Vivid using Tapatalk
Sounded as if he was comparing on all.three devices. Maybe not. Oh well.
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
Samsung is so half-ass.
Samsung went and sat in a room and said what can we do to lure iPhone users. What do they love about their phone?
They went and 1upped them in all those aspects. Problem is, I don't want an iPhone or a super iPhone. I like the Vivid and I've been a fan of HTC since forever. Wasn't a moto fan, but the Atrix was impressive. People hated on it, but to be honest it was great (unlock bootloader or not).
I dont want an over saturated screen, feather weight, colorful device (TW4 and their icons).
edit: Am I still dreaming to think companies like HTC and Moto can start releasing vanilla (+unlocked) versions of their devices? I don't need it to be subsidized!
This all really a matter of opinion--they're just phones. But I've done my fair share of fiddling with Samsung devices in the past. I've never really liked my dad's Captivate and had a friend with an SII. I was moving from an iPhone 4 to an Android device when I was looking at my upgrade options. HTC was extremely attractive to me, so when the Vivid came out I went to a local AT&T store and looked at the Vivid and Skyrocket (literally) side-by-side. The Vivid won out for me and I have no regrets. If someone else likes the Skyrocket more, then cool. So far though, I haven't been extremely impressed with Samsung's line-up of smartphones...
When it comes down to it, its user preffence, I've owned afew HTC's and can see the pros & cons..
Same as owning countless Samsung devices..I can see the pro & cons
Build quality on HTC phones are great but way to heavy, not my cup of tea..
HTC screens are not the best, not saying samsungs are but I actually like the colors on my S2, watching movies or really anything looks amazing..
I do agree on samsungs part of half assing structural phone quality ..but the screen and balance outweighs it all.
About the Galaxy Nexus, it seems to me abit rushed but the reality about Galaxy Nexus is alot of people forgetting that most apps are not yet compatible for android 4.0 or haven't been updated, so that's where you get alot of complaints ..also saw something about volume going low by its self, probly a software issue that will be addressed soon..
On a positive of Nexus is there support for there devices, no one can deny that.
I enjoy most devices and tinkering with them and basicly flash the same rom on all my devices, so I don't really mess around with touchwiz or sense..let alone blur
Im a big AOSP lover so either I'm on Cyanogen or anything based of AOSP..
So since I mod my phones I look into..
Development support..
& Specs..
If I wasn't gonna modify my device I'd get an iPhone..(which i also own)
My beater phone right now is a HTC Glacier, not the newest phone but it works..
Just saying..didn't post here to cause any drama but the main point is user preffence.
Sent from my CM7 SGS II

white HTC vivid or galaxy s2?

hey guys, just wanting to get some opinions. i have the galaxy s2 running miui but i am wanting to try the white HTC vivid. I'm hesitant because the Vivid doesn't have much of a dev support.
if you all had the ability to choose between the two, what phone would you guys pick?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
I sold my white S2 to buy a white Vivid. This is my first HTC device as well.
Cons:
- No Perma-Root (I use many apps that require root)
- Exynos > Snapdragon S3 (S2 felt faster in loading apps/transitions, but the Vivid still feels smooth and quick, especially the browser)
- Speakers are quite low on the Vivid while the S2's were quite loud and clear.
- My Vivid has 1 dust particle underneath the screen. Not a big deal because you can't see it while the screen is on, but its still there.
- SAMOLED+ produces better looking colors, but the higher res screen on the Vivid is a decent trade-off.
Apart from those, I don't miss anything from the S2 and prefer everything else on the Vivid. Vivid has better software which gives a better stock experience. Once custom roms come out, the Vivid will be even better but I'm more than contempt with the phone as it is right now.
Killer Bee said:
I sold my white S2 to buy a white Vivid. This is my first HTC device as well.
Cons:
- No Perma-Root (I use many apps that require root)
- Exynos > Snapdragon S3 (S2 felt faster in loading apps/transitions, but the Vivid still feels smooth and quick, especially the browser)
- Speakers are quite low on the Vivid while the S2's were quite loud and clear.
- My Vivid has 1 dust particle underneath the screen. Not a big deal because you can't see it while the screen is on, but its still there.
- SAMOLED+ produces better looking colors, but the higher res screen on the Vivid is a decent trade-off.
Apart from those, I don't miss anything from the S2 and prefer everything else on the Vivid. Vivid has better software which gives a better stock experience. Once custom roms come out, the Vivid will be even better but I'm more than contempt with the phone as it is right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks yeah that's what i was thinking as well. I do love the HTC build quality though that's the main reason I am thinking about switching.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
I just want to say that samoled is not superior in any way to the screen that vivd uses. The sreen on my vivid is actually very good. Samoled produses ovesaturated colors that just look unnatural, it us unable to display whites, is prone to burn in and is not very efficient when not displaying datk colors.
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk
It depends the LTE is a m a z I n g
The development will be here soon enough , I have both I love the vivid and the gs2
But the LTE is keeping me here
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
How long before the dev community and efforts pic up? Also, I hear that the video and low light camera functions were squirrelly. Is that true?
Development will probably pick up when HTC let's us unlock the bootloader.
Sent from my HTC Vivid™
Hope development picks up soon because I just sold the gs2 for 450. Gonna pick up the vivid tomorrow morning. Luckily I was able to get the unlimited by doing the iPhone2g trick. LTE!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
saywhat4118 said:
Hope development picks up soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ditto! Just bought the Vivid on friday but have yet to turn it on. Still currently on a JB'n 3GS. Im also waiting on a case and zagg screen cover to show up. Then Ill make the full jump
ROOT ROOT ROOT!

Worth it?

I'm currently on an Atrix and I'm thinking of switching to this phone since it has a faster cpu and the ics update is out. Should I go for it ? What do you guys think of the HTC vivid overall?
Atrix_Owner said:
I'm currently on an Atrix and I'm thinking of switching to this phone since it has a faster cpu and the ics update is out. Should I go for it ? What do you guys think of the HTC vivid overall?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from the atrix to the vivid ....lol
we all love our vivids join the group youll love the new phone for sure
Vivid all the way
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
Made the move from the Atrix 1 to Vivid, like day and night. Thanks to htc, vivid is the first us device to get ics.
Sent from my HTC Vivid via Tapatalk
Considering that the Atrix will not be getting the ICS release any time soon....
http://www.androidauthority.com/no-ics-update-for-motorola-atrix-4g-50718/
I would definitely upgrade.
The Atrix will be getting an upgrade in the third quarter it is on Moto's site.
That's probably September.
I came from the Atrix as well and yes the Vivid is a much faster and smoother device and I love ICS.
The battery life on the Atrix was better, the Vivid is superior in all other aspects imo.
Sent from my Rum Float Vivid using Tapatalk.
Knowing moto they'll throw BLUR on it too.
The Vivid is a great device...I highly recommend it, as the others have posted. Not sure if the OP is still checking this thread but if so, go for it!
Brand New said:
Knowing moto they'll throw BLUR on it too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but all manufacturers will do that. The Vivid has Sense on it.
I switched from the Atrix to the Vivid. I still have them both. For me, its all about HTC Sense and apps included.
Atrix Exchange/corporate email is horrible. Most phones EXCEPT the HTC Sense phones have horrible Exchange email. Sense also has a great agenda and calendar widget. It even has Task support with widget.
I had to buy $50 worth of apps and widgets on the Atrix to give me the convenience and productivity of the Vivid and Sense.
Battery life, screen size and CPU are trivial to me compared to functionality for business tasks.
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
Atrix_Owner said:
I'm currently on an Atrix and I'm thinking of switching to this phone since it has a faster cpu and the ics update is out. Should I go for it ? What do you guys think of the HTC vivid overall?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I made the switch from the ATRIX to the Vivid with an early upgrade, meaning unlike many people in here I paid $350. I took a gamble and so far could not be happier. I honestly hated my ATRIX when it was on stock, it was not until I got on CM7 that I actually enjoyed the phone. Being on the vivid just feels more solid and flows very nicely. So far the only dislike for the phone is the lack of S-OFF that makes flashing roms more complicated then it should be.
That beign said all around I love the VIVID. Alternatively there was a recent AT&T article that stated the ATRIX was to receive ICS "in the coming months"
While this is not the light at the end of a tunnel, the last time AT&T said that the Vivid became the first (or one of the first) non Galaxy phones to get ICS. So you may consider holding out and seeing what comes in the next few months.
Honestly i had a Galaxy S II and i (LOVED) it. but i couldnt keep wating for ICS. I was flashing so much not because i wanted to see new things. it was because i was bored. So i took a gamble. I figure HTC is better with updates than samsung(truth) So i got the Vivid On Thursday. Friday a software updated came to my phone it downloaded it and ran it. Next thing i know i have ICS. I couldnt believe it. So with that being said. Get the phone i love it!!!
Tegra 2 blows, 1.2ghz dual core snapdragon owns. Nuff said
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using XDA

Can't decide...

I have a choice between a galaxy s2 skyrocket or a HTC vivid. I can't decide......please help!
Thank you all
AJ
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
Both are great. IMO what made me switch to Vivid
ICS + Sense > GB (then ICS) + TW
Solid build > Plasticky build
Beats Audio > No beats
Both have same CPU
SR has better looking screen though and prolly better battery life. depends on what ur needs are
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Right now I'm on my fourth original Samsung galaxy s2 and att is letting me do an early upgrade. My battery lasts from 9am til 11pm with moderate use now. Also how much better is the vivid than the osgs2?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
asjdwf said:
Right now I'm on my fourth original Samsung galaxy s2 and att is letting me do an early upgrade. My battery lasts from 9am til 11pm with moderate use now. Also how much better is the vivid than the osgs2?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On my stock Vivid, I've gone 38 hours with light to moderate use. The Vivid has a higher resolution screen I believe - qHD as opposed to 800x480 but its an S-LCD panel and not a Super Amoled. Personally, I love the screen on the Vivid. The build quality of the Vivid is also better.
All Android HTC devices use Sense...it might be something you have to get used to but its lightyears better than a Samsung or stock Android UI as far as I'm concerned. But to each their own.
The one thing I like about the Skyrocket is that it clocks its processor at 1.5GHz stock and HTC for whatever reason, probably battery life, decided to clock theirs at 1.2GHz - they are the same processor. But if you're unlocked and rooted, you can always flash an OC kernel to bump up the speed.
Sent from my HTC Vivid
slapdaddy said:
On my stock Vivid, I've gone 38 hours with light to moderate use. The Vivid has a higher resolution screen I believe - qHD as opposed to 800x480 but its an S-LCD panel and not a Super Amoled. Personally, I love the screen on the Vivid. The build quality of the Vivid is also better.
All Android HTC devices use Sense...it might be something you have to get used to but its lightyears better than a Samsung or stock Android UI as far as I'm concerned. But to each their own.
The one thing I like about the Skyrocket is that it clocks its processor at 1.5GHz stock and HTC for whatever reason, probably battery life, decided to clock theirs at 1.2GHz - they are the same processor. But if you're unlocked and rooted, you can always flash an OC kernel to bump up the speed.
Sent from my HTC Vivid
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly on using a vivid. I love it, the phone that is.
But there isn't too many roms for it and most of them have HTC sense
The Samsung galaxy s2 skyrocket has way better looks. I love the stock operator and everything. I am not a fan of sense. Hate it. But o well right lol.
Anyways if you're looking for just quality and don't plan on rooting is go with the vivid. The skyrocket just look at the appearence of the apps and stuff there isn't much difference just the development here on xda is more roms for the skyrocket
So its all just on how you feel about sense and Rom development. If u like sense and don't plan on rooting definitely go with vivid
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using XDA
I don't plan on ever rooting. I'm just afraid of how much older it is than the skyrocket or the newer models.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
asjdwf said:
I don't plan on ever rooting. I'm just afraid of how much older it is than the skyrocket or the newer models.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Vivid and the Skyrocket were both released november 2011. The Skyrocket HD has not yet launched. I just bought a Vivid and my boyfriend has the skyrocket.
The resolution is better on the vivid, the screen is better on the sr. The SR battery is seriously better. Even considering the CPU clock speed difference, the htc feels smoother and more responsive. The SR doesn't have led notification light, which I can't live without but others don't seem to care either way.
Since you are planning to stay stock, I'd go to a store and play with both phones. Samsung's touchwhiz interface feels very different from htc's sense ui, so this might come down to personal preference. Again with personal preference but I think the stock apps from htc, the dialer, weather, stock info, contacts,etc are nicer.
Vivid all the way
Sent from my HTC Vivid via Tapatalk
Skyrocket with HTC sense?
I just bought an skyrocket I 727 for use on Straight talk. I had an HTC Evo on Sprint and loved the Sense,especially the email format. Can I do that on my skyrocket? it's already been rooted. how would I go about it and what would the best build be in your opinion?
Anyone? Anyone?
ICS + Sense > GB (then ICS) + TW
Solid build > Plasticky build
Beats Audio > No beats
Both have same CPU
SR has better looking screen though and prolly better battery life. depends on what ur needs are
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2[/QUOTE]

Categories

Resources