LG Optimus 4X HD - LG Optimus 4X HD

This phone has the potential to be a beast. This has nothing to with the Evo 3D but you might as well read up a bit while you guys wait for ICS.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/lg-optimus-4x-hd-unveiled-quad-core-tegra-3-ice-cream-sandwich/

Damn, this phone looks like it will raise the bar for all the other phones, just like the Evo 4G did.
4.7 inch, HD (could be higher def), quad core - the perfect phone for mobile gaming

Pretty much. I think it will need a bigger battery. 2000+ or whatever won't cut it.

That phone does indeed look like a beast, and I look forward to MWC 2012, where I hope that HTC can deliver an equally beastly phone

Funny thing is, with all the negativity surrounding its predecessor, the Optimus 2X, previous owners are highly skeptical lol. They hate LG with a passion.
Sent from my Galaxy SII

Not impressed
Sent from my mean EVO 3d

http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/lgs-upcoming-mwc-lineup-runs-into-some-italians-gets-documente/
engadget just dropped a video looks so smooth its in italian thou lol
im digging it so far. only thing im waiting to see is if a quad core a15 chip gets dropped at MWC. the tegra 3 is nice and im sure the exynos quad core will be very nice but they r both a9's. i believe the dual core a15's match up or beat the a9 quad cores so imagine an a15 quad core dont take my word for it thou haha im pretty sure i read that somewhere
only a couple days left cant wait. ill most likely get a dual core a15 over a tegra 3 need to see how they stack up next to each other!

swaze said:
Not impressed
Sent from my mean EVO 3d
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep... Pretty much

dylan6879 said:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/lgs-upcoming-mwc-lineup-runs-into-some-italians-gets-documente/
engadget just dropped a video looks so smooth its in italian thou lol
im digging it so far. only thing im waiting to see is if a quad core a15 chip gets dropped at MWC. the tegra 3 is nice and im sure the exynos quad core will be very nice but they r both a9's. i believe the dual core a15's match up or beat the a9 quad cores so imagine an a15 quad core dont take my word for it thou haha im pretty sure i read that somewhere
only a couple days left cant wait. ill most likely get a dual core a15 over a tegra 3 need to see how they stack up next to each other!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Texas instruments just showcased dualcore A15 omap.it beats the tegra 3 and its just clocked at 800mhz.so imagine a 2ghz one.
Full article here
http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium

josephnero said:
Texas instruments just showcased dualcore A15 omap.it beats the tegra 3 and its just clocked at 800mhz.so imagine a 2ghz one.
Full article here
http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha yeah I thought so. That's insane can't wait to see these things fly I'll be skipping the whole quad core trend for one of these unless of course there happens to be some magical quad core a15. Performance over big numbers haha.. hope Sprint shows something off at MWC even thou they normally don't.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium

dylan6879 said:
Ha yeah I thought so. That's insane can't wait to see these things fly I'll be skipping the whole quad core trend for one of these unless of course there happens to be some magical quad core a15. Performance over big numbers haha.. hope Sprint shows something off at MWC even thou they normally don't.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have fun waiting till Q1 2013.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium

I haven't heard anything about a microsd card in this thing yet. Am I missing something or does that seem to be the case? I don't want anything to do with a phone that doesn't have microsd.
Sent from my Shooter using xda premium

swaze said:
have fun waiting till Q1 2013.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well now i meant an a15 processor TI isnt the only company announcing them. wait now that i look r they i thought there was more? what is the new sanpdragon krait based on? someone knowledgable chime in pls! and for the moment i dont mind waiting haha my 3d is still perfect in my eyes im just a tech junkie and whenever there is something new i either sell mine or hand it on down in the family and jump on the newest
wish it was as easy to do with my car

dylan6879 said:
well now i meant an a15 processor TI isnt the only company announcing them. wait now that i look r they i thought there was more? what is the new sanpdragon krait based on? someone knowledgable chime in pls! and for the moment i dont mind waiting haha my 3d is still perfect in my eyes im just a tech junkie and whenever there is something new i either sell mine or hand it on down in the family and jump on the newest
wish it was as easy to do with my car
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Garbage
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D using XDA App

sgt. slaughter said:
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i thought the snapdragon s4 was but i wasnt sure, tried to search it and couldnt find anywere that mentions its an a15 although im sure it is. was thinking the same thing as i read that everyone is going to 28nm and samsung of everyone is only going down to 32nm but u know it will be a very nice one.
definitely need to keep an eye on intel i havent been impressed with what theyve shown off so far but them being intel they have the background and resources to make some serious competition around here. 14nm is crazy mwc hasnt even started and i cant wait for ces..

sgt. slaughter said:
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read in andtech that S4 is modified architecture with a performance between A9 and A15.still sounds awesome
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium

That video was impressive. But I don't like lg phones....
Sent from my EVO 3D with ViperROM via XDA premium app

z50king said:
That video was impressive. But I don't like lg phones....
Sent from my EVO 3D with ViperROM via XDA premium app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here bro.i never trust LG

josephnero said:
I read in andtech that S4 is modified architecture with a performance between A9 and A15.still sounds awesome
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah your right to an extent but its NOT "between" them its inline with A15 if not better...the write up at anandtech.com about the new S4's benchmarking is really well done. As are their other write ups concerning the chip.
...Qualcomm, unlike most ARM chip makers, does not license the architecture for its application processors directly from ARM Holdings. Instead, it designs its own cores in-house and simply licenses the ARM instruction set. At the most basic level, Qualcomm’s Krait core is more advanced than Cortex-A9, the current standard from ARM, and it may even best the next-generation Cortex-A15 core....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.extremetech.com/computin...ragon-s4-has-the-competition-on-the-defensive

Related

Pop quiz! AMD or Intel?

So I'm working on my new computer, and I need help! I'm looking into bulldozer, but it keeps getting delayed. I feel like we may be seeing i9 before Bulldozer.
I'm looking for good performance, for a little bit less.
Opinions? No flaming!
Chandelure said:
So I'm working on my new computer, and I need help! I'm looking into bulldozer, but it keeps getting delayed. I feel like we may be seeing i9 before Bulldozer.
I'm looking for good performance, for a little bit less.
Opinions? No flaming!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Intel Core i5 would be nice.....because I've not been following up on AMD lately.....
Forever living in my Galaxy Ace using XDA App
AMD fanboy since day one. Seriously, just buy whatever you can afford.
It depends. What do you plan on using this rig for?
Sent from my I897 using XDA App
Currently i7 rules but bulldozer and ivy-bridge may change that
Also it'll depend on ur budget and what you plan using the rig for
bradleyG said:
It depends. What do you plan on using this rig for?
Sent from my I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Development.
And i7 is far to many $$$
Sent from my LG-VM670 using XDA App
Well if i7 is out of your budget an AMD Phenom II x6 is real cheap right now with bulldozer around the corner (This is what I currently have).
I honestly would wait for bulldozer so you aren't feeling buyers remorse once it comes out. I highly doubt you will be able to afford ivy bridge if you can't afford i7. Intel is soo pricey.
if ur budget is less than 500$ than amd if more than that move to intel..
Chandelure said:
Development.
And i7 is far to many $$$
Sent from my LG-VM670 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend those fast i5s .
Forever living in my Galaxy Ace using XDA App
2600K at 300$
I have the quad core i5 750 Oc'ed to 4Ghz with no problems and only a cheap upgrade to stock cooling.
It FLIES!
Half the cost of an i7 too
Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk
How did u oc it?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
How did u oc it?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
jsplace said:
I have the quad core i5 750 Oc'ed to 4Ghz with no problems and only a cheap upgrade to stock cooling.
It FLIES!
Half the cost of an i7 too
Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a first generation core I5 processor coupled to am Asus motherboard !! Overclocked from stock 2.8 ghz to 3.5 ghz with just the right air cooling products and a good processor fan and heat sink combo !
Tapashocked via my gt-I9003 with a random keyboard of my choice !
Amd. Will not buy intel.
-My life is a shooting range, people never change-
had you asked this question 2-3 years ago I would have said Amd hands down. On-die memory controller used to make all the difference. Now that Intel has on-die memory controllers with their core i3/5/7 line, Amd is definitely lagging behind in performance. I'd still recomend a black edition phenom II x4 or x6 for someone who loves to tweak and game out, but if you've got the cash, Intel sure seems to be the ring leader lately.
I had a 9550 BE phenom I, in a nice desktop system, ran it at 3ghz stable, was a fast box. Was given an hp dv6-3050ca which has an i5 in it, with the fancy on die memory controller and video acceleration. Wow was I EVER impressed at the progress intel has made, I even managed to run fallout new vegas at 15-20fps on low settings on this thing. We're talking intel graphics here, integrated. They've made leaps and bounds in the past few years. I currently have a Core i7 720qm sitting in a asus g73jh; I'd say it has a bit of a low clock speed with all 4 cores engaged, but with 8 threads, what's the difference. Takes a Phenom II x6 to match the same level of performance. Though either can be had new for about the same price.
Intel i7's are pricey as all hell, and unless you've got cash to dump and are looking for extreme performance, you'll probably be more than happy with an Amd. If you're looking to game matching up a nice Amd/Ati motherboard with an Ati video card, really does wonders in terms of compatibility, I've built a few myself and they were painless builds. Intels tend to be more efficient, expecially in the mobile arena. There's something sexy about a 140W cpu though, and that's where the phenom II line shines, they chew up power like nazi's chew up amphetamines, and they chew through like raped apes.
All in all amd is a good start/middleroad for the money, but for true high end power, or mobile efficiency stick to intel. I've noticed a trend across all cpu manufacturers, the more on die cache, the better. 2mb extra cache is worth more than 600mhz, imho.
0.02C CDN
I think the biggest problem of AMD is compatibility. Usually They don't work truely in some Linux Distros.
Pure preference. What's your budget?
Hmmm, sounds like i5 it is. Thanks guys!
Chandelure said:
Hmmm, sounds like i5 it is. Thanks guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
one more thing, AMD heats fast. it can cook your PC within 8 hours

Given this is the best... Any other new ones out that can compare?

Hola
So i am one of those types of users that likes to indulge with new tech especially phones. Windows Phones are too limited, Apple is controlling (though yes the same can be said about Microsoft mobiles), so I am pleased that Google came out with an open platform.
Now that Sammy has brought out the Galaxy S2, which was a really excellent device, and afterwards the great Note, is there really anything better that we can expect soon? It's like we have hit the top edge with no where to go at all. None of the other OEM's can't seem to make decent phones to compete...
What is your opinion?
So what you want me to do 'bout that?
Probably a bit premature to make that pronouncement as most tech is quickly out of date but am guessing this was for discussion
Am looking forward to Tegra3 quad core coming out to mobiles (check out the Transformer Prime), increased cpu and gpu speeds with ics, improved battery life, faster internet speeds 4g or more.
i saw a tech demo where a guy connected his galaxy nexus to a monitor, bluetooth keyboard and trackpad, and mouse and used that as his main computer.
also hoping for a galaxy note the size of an 8.9 tab with the notes' digitizer.
Lots more to look forward to.
huawei announced a quad-core with 16 graphics cores at mwc 2012.
looks like we still have a way to go just yet, most likely lower power consumption.
i wouldnt let that stop anyone from purchasing a galaxy note though. in my opinion it is by far the best android phone currently on the market.
htc one x...quad core tegra 3..awesum device...beats the note in every benchmark
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
jai147 said:
htc one x...quad core tegra 3..awesum device...beats the note in every benchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally I find huge amounts of processing-power quite meaningless on a mobile device, it's useful only if you play lots of games. If one could slap the mobile on a dock and turn it into a full desktop then it would be a different matter, then all the processing-power would actually start to make sense.
I just hope one or another manufacturer does come out with a mobile with a good dock and properly-supported desktop OS, there is no such a solution available yet.
Good thing I use my phone for real life applications like videos, Web surfing, drawing etc and not benchmarks then, and there the note is by far better.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
jai147 said:
htc one x...quad core tegra 3..awesum device...beats the note in every benchmark
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
except screen size!!!
jai147 said:
htc one x...quad core tegra 3..awesum device...beats the note in every benchmark
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you like messing with quad-core on a passive-cooling device?
Tell me more about its usefullness on a longer period of useage.
Also to point out the Note actually does what its supposed to with the S-Pen, taking notes on the spot.
'Ubuntu for Android' is a usage scenario that will warrant quad-core processing. Check it out on the Ubuntu site.
Some manufacturers argue that quad-cores use less energy due to lower clock speeds, and shorter utilisation times. I know nothing about hardware though so I couldn't argue for or against this mindset.
Sent from my GT-N7000B using XDA
jai147 said:
htc one x...quad core tegra 3..awesum device...beats the note in every benchmark
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks = donkey turds
From the big ole Note
The Galaxy Note is now what was the HD2 then... the top performing AND
customizable phone for almost 2 years running. HD2 is still a top-phone, considering it will run anything from winmo 6.5, WP7, Android 2.3 on SD and in NAND, as well as ICS, ubuntu etc.
This fossile HD2 still runs my ubuntu in the car pretty darn fast!
You just know when such a "long lasting gadget" is released, if your blood runs a datastream and your hart pumps in cycles.
SonyWalkMan,C=64,Amiga500,PortableMp3player,Any1,8Ghz laptop, HTC HD2, Galaxy Note, Porsche 911.
You just know.

I dont think quad core is worth using

a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core. Plus, it is Tegra 3 which means no support.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
OP, you're not making yourself clear. Please elaborate.
kaspar737 said:
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but how is that so? What is your definition of an OS not being "optimized" for multiple cores? Based on my limited knowledge, kernels take control of the activation and deactivation of the cores, and the apps themself are the ones that are supposed to "take advantage" of the cores.
How is an OS supposed be "optimized" for a quad core CPU?
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now I think buying a tegra inside device is not a good idea, the same with lg.
kaspar737 said:
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core. Plus, it is Tegra 3 which means no support.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is up there with some of the stupidest things iv ever read.
I think the Android ecosystem is so complex that occasional lags are bound to happen even if we reach a point of using 8 cores on a smartphone. (And that, is why iOS is so smooth with slower hardware. It's a simpler OS.)
But the Tegra3 pretty much leaves everyone in the dust when it comes to games.
But when it comes to support... oh noes
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
kaspar737 said:
But when it comes to support... oh noes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The international version of the HTC One X with Tegra 3 has already gotten its full sources released a while ago.
At least it seems Nvidia isn't as unsupportive as we think they are. LG, apparently, is the one that is holding back from releasing sources for us.
Yea, but when Android 5 comes out then I hope that they will release all the necessary stuff. That may make me think better about Nvidia.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
silentmelodies said:
The international version of the HTC One X with Tegra 3 has already gotten its full sources released a while ago.
At least it seems Nvidia isn't as unsupportive as we think they are. LG, apparently, is the one that is holding back from releasing sources for us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With nvidia drivers and hals to the public?
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok good for you
now i am goign to enjoy my Quad Core phone again okay?
What is the point of this thread? As for desktop PC's, more cores = better (most of the time). Since dual cores work just fine in both GB and ICS the same goes for quad cores. And NO, quad cores don't mean less battery duration.
Maybe he is just jeaulous but i dont think a phone needs quad core. For web browsing and watching videos (well.. lol tegra 2 ) some gameing. dual core is more than enough. As i mentiond some time ago in other thread this reminds me of megapixel hunt in compact digital cameras market.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what was the purpose of posting it here? do you want to make an excuse that quadcore isn't nowhere near better than dualcore?
I agree with someone said quadcore isn't really important for mobile phone. If only O2x have more than 512 MB RAM I bet it will last for next 2-3 years
Durio said:
And what was the purpose of posting it here? do you want to make an excuse that quadcore isn't nowhere near better than dualcore?
I agree with someone said quadcore isn't really important for mobile phone. If only O2x have more than 512 MB RAM I bet it will last for next 2-3 years
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It can still last for 2-3 years, you just wont be able to multitask when playing games so much in the future.
quadcores will be **** if they dont have that 5th core for when there isnt much going on or they will chew through battery.
The new huwai something has its own quadcore and it smashes all cuurent quad cores in benchmarks, tegra 3 the exenos ect. But if it doesnt have that 5th core it will probably be bad. Its said to come with a 2300mah battery.
eraldo said:
It can still last for 2-3 years, you just wont be able to multitask when playing games so much in the future.
quadcores will be **** if they dont have that 5th core for when there isnt much going on or they will chew through battery.
The new huwai something has its own quadcore and it smashes all cuurent quad cores in benchmarks, tegra 3 the exenos ect. But if it doesnt have that 5th core it will probably be bad. Its said to come with a 2300mah battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But branding sometimes matter. Market rarely pay attention to a brand like Huawei,compared to samsung. I heard Meizu MX also decent but yeah it has the same market problem
Sent from fastest O2X ever
Durio said:
But branding sometimes matter. Market rarely pay attention to a brand like Huawei,compared to samsung. I heard Meizu MX also decent but yeah it has the same market problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Meizu MX Quad has pretty good specs (including the same Exynos 4212 in the S3), but is sold only in China. It's not meant to compete internationally.
Most useless thread ever.
My HTC one x is a hundred times better than my o2x was
Sent from my HTC One X
Kickasskev said:
My HTC one x is a hundred times better than my o2x was
Sent from my HTC One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and o2x is hundred times cheaper...common sense

Anyone Else Disappointed By The CPU?

I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??
ben83s said:
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.
GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am not into this topic right now but afaik there is no real open source hardware competitor on a tegra 3 level
gh123man said:
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you mean. But when your trying to copy the Kindle Fire and go main stream global, you need something that proven to work. IMHO at £160 its a big anouph gamble all ready.
No, the tegra 3 isn't as good as it should be, but for web surfing, a little gaming and movies and music, its more than enough. Quit griping. Lol
People always find something to complain about. Lol
OP the problem is the price. For $200 you need to go with the cheapest high end processor available, and apparently that is what Nvidia did with the Kai El project to put out speedy, low price tablets. Personally dual core is quick enough for me, plus I just bought a 7" tablet so...
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2
Yes, the tegra 3 isnt the best chip-set, but if they went with the snapdragon s4 they would have horrible supply issues, as there isnt enough s4's as it is. Also this was made by asus who has an existing relationship with nvida. Google has used this as a reference platform so it will be heavily optimized so performance shouldn't be an issue especially considering the screen resolution, keep in mind this is the same processor that runs the transformer prime at 1080p, without all the new gpu goodies. fyi all current tablets run tegra 3's
Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.
Cares said:
Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?
darkamikaze said:
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, it just means slower Dev updates after Google has given it up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
GBGamer said:
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, but apps are.
dalkor said:
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, apps are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
My opinion tegra 3 is the best CPU+GPU combo until the s4 quad core. I have a tegra 3 on my one x and hardly any lag whatsoever. Games look amazing, and amazing standby times. Maybe the nexus 7 will force nvidia to release drivers ect because of the demand
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
tegra3 optimized games are by far the best Android games around. Tegra3 is no slouch, CPU or gpu wise. there will be no issues with custom roms. One X has a ton of custom roms/kernels. Prime has alot of roms also. I'm sure Nexus 7 will be far more popular than either of them.
GBGamer said:
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For $199 ? And they don't arrive until Q3/Q4.
For 200$ hell no I'm not disappointed
Stop complaining about everything!!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
I <3 Tegra. Got a Tegra phone and tegra tsblet... so gonna get the N7. I don't see what the problem is. Its very fast and good for gaming from the TegraZone
Sent from my Asus Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app
The Tegra 3 is actually a pretty powerful chipset. Think it's tainted a bit by being the 'child' of the Tegra 2, which was not as great as we hoped it would be. Combined with some of the performance improvements in Jelly Bean I expect this device to fly.

About CPU And Camera

ultra-pix 4mpx means lower quality better pic in dark?!
how is performance! coz its only 1.7 Ghz quad core and snapdragon 600!
and why didnt HTC use snapdragon 800! or tegra 4-4i is it only for tablets!? :silly:
kamranhaghighi said:
ultra-pix 4mpx means lower quality better pic in dark?!
how is performance! coz its only 1.7 Ghz quad core and snapdragon 600!
and why didnt HTC use snapdragon 800! or tegra 4-4i is it only for tablets!? :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The words 'lower' and 'better' are comparative words. Compared to what?
nothing takes pics in dark coz light is need for sensor make better pic.
performance is good.
Ask HTC.
kamranhaghighi said:
ultra-pix 4mpx means lower quality better pic in dark?!
how is performance! coz its only 1.7 Ghz quad core and snapdragon 600!
and why didnt HTC use snapdragon 800! or tegra 4-4i is it only for tablets!? :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon 800 has is not out yet maybe Q4
Sent from my Desire Z using xda premium
strip419 said:
Snapdragon 800 has is not out yet maybe Q4
Sent from my Desire Z using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks omg i can't wait that mush almsot 6months!
kamranhaghighi said:
thanks omg i can't wait that mush almsot 6months!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omg what is wrong with you they announce new stuff all the time.
If you were like this with everything then you ether have a new phone every 5mins or never having a new phone out of fear it being old in 5mins.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
hmmm.... u right but can u tell me wich phone coz stuck between S-IV Htc one also S-IV got a 1.9 ghz CPU! Anyway i can also over cloack it to 1.9 coz it supports
kamranhaghighi said:
hmmm.... u right but can u tell me wich phone coz stuck between S-IV Htc one also S-IV got a 1.9 ghz CPU! Anyway i can also over cloack it to 1.9 coz it supports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally I find HTC phones better than samsung phones. video audio, music volume and washed out camera indoors is major problems i had with S2/3/GN2 and very boring UI. Only reason I chose samsung phones was because of hardware and battery life but now HTC and Sony imo are there in terms of hardware and battery life aswell now, so for me samsung with their ugly boring UI is irrelevant now.
coz its only 1.7 Ghz quad core and snapdragon 600!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wat
ty im going for htc one and coz both are snapdragon 600 i can make my htc one 1.9ghz?
also smasung ui not boring:S htc one link bleed is to simple and boring (i had a htc sensation its freaking awesome also ui is freaking awesome better than my current note and it was faster, no problem , i sent my Note 2 times to guaranty) ! i just scared about the cpu and gpu
nvm searched web so im going to but it but can i overcloack to 1.9? coz its snapdragon 600 and support up to 1.9ghz else will buy s-IV
Camera shoots 30 or 60 fps (1080p)
I have one question. Is it true that HTC ONE is able record 1080p 60fps?? I don´t think so, but I have read that i can.
Thanks for true answers.
xvasek said:
I have one question. Is it true that HTC ONE is able record 1080p 60fps?? I don´t think so, but I have read that i can.
Thanks for true answers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is able. The camera is fantastic on it. I'm blown away when I go to bars and parties how good it is. I was highly suspicious that it was only 4MP at first, and nearly didn't get it, but it's been better than any phone camera I've ever used so far. It's even great for Youtube vlogging.
This topic shows how they sell millions of phones every year.
xvasek said:
I have one question. Is it true that HTC ONE is able record 1080p 60fps?? I don´t think so, but I have read that i can.
Thanks for true answers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
1080p (Full HD) = 30fps
720p (HD) = 60fps
The one isn't even out yet..
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
XxSHaDoWxSLaYeRxX said:
The one isn't even out yet..
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. UK has had it for 2 weeks now.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources