Can someone comment on stability/usefulness of official CM9? - Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Nightlies just started officially dropping the other day, so I'm curious what you guys have thought thus far.
Found here: http://get.cm/?device=quincyatt
I'm on a stock ICS build, so I think I have to flash a GB ROM and then flash CM from there. Which is fine; just curious

starkruzr said:
Nightlies just started officially dropping the other day, so I'm curious what you guys have thought thus far.
Found here: http://get.cm/?device=quincyatt
I'm on a stock ICS build, so I think I have to flash a GB ROM and then flash CM from there. Which is fine; just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Going by cm based roms as of june, it's very stable, definitely stable enough for daily driver. Issues as of june, shorter battery, possible GPS issues, blue tooth a2dp stable connection.
I'd definitely give it a try and thanks for the heads up.
And yes, you need to flash from GB kernel with Root and cwm afaik.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Its very stable rom I am currently using it
U should give it a try
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Using PA based on CM9 from the time it came out. No problems at all. Amazing ROM!
Sent from my Galaxy Note running ParanoidAndroid v0.4 using XDA Premium xD

sujal said:
Using PA based on CM9 from the time it came out. No problems at all. Amazing ROM!
Sent from my Galaxy Note running ParanoidAndroid v0.4 using XDA Premium xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1+ I concur, even though I didn't get on-board with paranoid android rom until version 04 was released but it is an EXCELLENT rom! Maybe the PA team should get together with Samsung on making this rom preinstalled software for the next generation of galaxy note.

Never gonna happen

Are the battery issues mitigated from what they were?

starkruzr said:
Are the battery issues mitigated from what they were?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on my device (ymmv!), after the basic tweaks (disabling unnecessary apps, syncs etc.), the standby battery life was not worse than on stock GB or ICS. During normal usage, esp. while browsing on wifi it was much better - the estimated current consumption on CM9 was at ca. 500mA on new ICS 4.0.4 its closer to 750mA in the same conditions.

Related

4.1 JB for Captivate?

Hey guys, just out of curiosity, will we ever get Jellybean ported to the Captivate? If so how long does this process normally take?
Sorry I have no idea how these things work, not being impatient, just wondering.
Thanks
If you want it that bad, the TAJB port for I9000 works fine on our phone with the latest Devil Kernel
It's a slightly long process to get everything(SMS+phone) to work
1: clear dalvik, normal cache, and wipe data
2: flash TAJB .45
3: flash devil Kernel
4: search through thread and flash test modem for phone calls and SMS
5: place the audio_policy.conf from the nexus s port into the system/etc/ folder
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
There's another thread discussing Jelly Bean for Captivate. You might want to check that one. It doesn't have any firm timeframes for any of the ROMs to release a 4.1 version, but it does confirm that they're working on it.
Try this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1775373, it works fine for me. Only things that do not work - Camera and Sound notifications. Otherwise, it is pretty awesome. :laugh:
Yeah ,JB on Cap but camera and youtube not work
fancy90 said:
Yeah ,JB on Cap but camera and youtube not work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umm.. there is a fix for the youtube in unofficial cm10 android 4.1 thread in the captivate android development thread...
irfarf said:
umm.. there is a fix for the youtube in unofficial cm10 android 4.1 thread in the captivate android development thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh , I install cm10 v2 is working good
Just flashed it using the directions posted.
Can't seem to get my Data to connect. Won't save any apn's I add to it to connect. The phone can locate the appropriate Network Operator (CAN Rogers Wireless Inc.), but data will not connect.Also, when I go to the Data Usage tab, it doesn't show a tab that lets you see Data na dWireless usage like it did in ICS.
Any ideas on how to fix?? JellyBean is wicked smooth for such an ealy release and I'd hate to revert back to CM9 (it was not cooperating with my cappy!)
I'm on jb, and everything seems to be working extremely well for such am early alpha release! Running the unofficial Cm10v2 with devil kernel
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
It's awesome!
TheSchatz said:
I'm on jb, and everything seems to be working extremely well for such am early alpha release! Running the unofficial Cm10v2 with devil kernel
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, just installed it last night and it's smoother than any rom I've EVER used! That project butter google built for jb is crazy smooth
Funny thing guys, Project butter hasn't been incorporated into the kernels yet. The v-sync and timings have to be messed with. So if you think it's smooth now, wait until project butter is actually running
b-eock said:
Funny thing guys, Project butter hasn't been incorporated into the kernels yet. The v-sync and timings have to be messed with. So if you think it's smooth now, wait until project butter is actually running
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's ridiculous. I noticed an amazing jump in smoothness from the latest CM9 nightly to the V2 of the Jelly Bean ROM and if it's only gonna get better, I can't wait to see how fast it gets. Still very, very minor bugs that barely affect functionality at all, but man is it fast!
ya i noticed it was crazy smooth as well. but couldn't live w/o camera. so i went back to remics-ux. which is almost identically smooth imo. cant wait util we actually get project butter and a fully functional jb rom
Phlashaholic said:
ya i noticed it was crazy smooth as well. but couldn't live w/o camera. so i went back to remics-ux. which is almost identically smooth imo. cant wait util we actually get project butter and a fully functional jb rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remics ICS is what I'm still running, this rom with Sephamore kernel is just incredibly responsive and smooth.
shariqm said:
Remics ICS is what I'm still running, this rom with Sephamore kernel is just incredibly responsive and smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You ought to relook the JB ROMs. I'm using DerTeufel's, and haven't had any problems with any component in the last three releases.
cbalt and dave have stripped down versions of DerTeufel's port, and by all reports, they're worth of being your daily driver, too.
peteypoo said:
You ought to relook the JB ROMs. I'm using DerTeufel's, and haven't had any problems with any component in the last three releases.
cbalt and dave have stripped down versions of DerTeufel's port, and by all reports, they're worth of being your daily driver, too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been on cbalt's version like 4 I think since 28 July as daily with no problem camera working and even TV out
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium

Fastest ROM with best battery life

Hi guys,
So... I've tried a few ROMs on my note... currently on CM10 preview 3. I'm asking as above what is the best ICS or above ROM (fastest) which also has good battery life?...
Or.... what are the best settings to use on CM10 p3 for fastest yet good battery life? I've seen that NoteCore ROM... is that good?
Thanks.
Sent from my GT-N7000 running CM10 p3 (4.1.1 jb)
CleaNote ROM & Kernel FTW !!!!
azzledazzle said:
CleaNote ROM & Kernel FTW !!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it ICs yeh? Thank you
Sent from my GT-N7000 running CyanogenMod 10 P3 (4.1.1 jb)
azzledazzle said:
CleaNote ROM & Kernel FTW !!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I have discovered this ROM yesterday and I am using it for a 2 days. Excellent.
But I have a question, should I stay with current v8 kernel or it is ok to move to v11.
I am not sure if I am going to ruin my battery life and performance.
Thanks in advance
I have tried em all and have found a winning rom:
[ROM][ICS][01-08-12][0.8] AniDroid-N7000 (CM9 | 3.0.38 | SLQB | OC)
Using that rom with its stock kernel I am getting very nice performance and battery life!! 3G+ data+sync on (WIFI and the rest disabled) I am getting 1% an hour drain! I am tempted to try a CM10 but I would only be doing so 'to have the latest' whilst not necessarily being 'the greatest'. I do get itchy though but will probably await for the Project Butter to be working and then I'll switch.
cd993 said:
I have tried em all and have found a winning rom:
[ROM][ICS][01-08-12][0.8] AniDroid-N7000 (CM9 | 3.0.38 | SLQB | OC)
Using that rom with its stock kernel I am getting very nice performance and battery life!! 3G+ data+sync on (WIFI and the rest disabled) I am getting 1% an hour drain! I am tempted to try a CM10 but I would only be doing so 'to have the latest' whilst not necessarily being 'the greatest'. I do get itchy though but will probably await for the Project Butter to be working and then I'll switch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, thanks for the info! Going to read more about both of these and try them out!
Does anyone know of a way of removing Navigation bar (softkeys) from AniDroid?... pretty pointless as I have hardware buttons....
Fusion Rom v3.0 with its stock kernel really impressed me.
Rocket Rom too.
The first has more battery But a bit buggy to me.
Enviado por Galaxy Note via Tapatalk 2
dejson said:
Actually I have discovered this ROM yesterday and I am using it for a 2 days. Excellent.
But I have a question, should I stay with current v8 kernel or it is ok to move to v11.
I am not sure if I am going to ruin my battery life and performance.
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on Cleannote v4 and Notecore v11... the performance is great and I think the battery life is very good, and think most on both would agree.
If you don't like touchwiz, basic ROMs, then this may not be the right combination for you... but I find it clean, smooth, and efficient. I don't care about all the extras, just want a phone that works and runs my apps dependably and quickly.
Give v11 a try. Just do a nandroid first and you can always flash back if you don't like it for some reason (I can't think of any reason).
dejson said:
Actually I have discovered this ROM yesterday and I am using it for a 2 days. Excellent.
But I have a question, should I stay with current v8 kernel or it is ok to move to v11.
I am not sure if I am going to ruin my battery life and performance.
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would recommend to stick with it if you are not facing any issues.
Since you want to upgrade Use only Standard version. OC versions drains battery pretty fast.
hchxoom said:
I'm on Cleannote v4 and Notecore v11... the performance is great and I think the battery life is very good, and think most on both would agree.
If you don't like touchwiz, basic ROMs, then this may not be the right combination for you... but I find it clean, smooth, and efficient. I don't care about all the extras, just want a phone that works and runs my apps dependably and quickly.
Give v11 a try. Just do a nandroid first and you can always flash back if you don't like it for some reason (I can't think of any reason).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sahilarora2003 said:
I would recommend to stick with it if you are not facing any issues.
Since you want to upgrade Use only Standard version. OC versions drains battery pretty fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like stock a lot. Always been fun of AOSP only. With note for the first time i dont want to go to AOSP because the phone has a s-pen and I am using it very often.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
dejson said:
I like stock a lot. Always been fun of AOSP only. With note for the first time i dont want to go to AOSP because the phone has a s-pen and I am using it very often.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use papyrus on aokp. Same functionality as spen.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
I'm going to sound a complete moron here but what do AOKP and AOSP mean?
Sent from my GT-N7000 running AniDroid 0.8 (4.0.4)
Asylum v20 is blazing fast!
Sent from asylum warden's office.
dmonuk said:
I'm going to sound a complete moron here but what do AOKP and AOSP mean?
Sent from my GT-N7000 running AniDroid 0.8 (4.0.4)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP : android open source project, the link : http://source.android.com/
AOKP : android open kang project, It is a custom ROM distribution for many Android devices. link : http://aokp.co/
Fastest ROM is Asylum CM 10.1. If you are flashoholic, you will never find your battery giving more backup. You have to give your phone some time to adjust itself with the kernel.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
hchxoom said:
I'm on Cleannote v4 and Notecore v11... the performance is great and I think the battery life is very good, and think most on both would agree.
If you don't like touchwiz, basic ROMs, then this may not be the right combination for you... but I find it clean, smooth, and efficient. I don't care about all the extras, just want a phone that works and runs my apps dependably and quickly.
Give v11 a try. Just do a nandroid first and you can always flash back if you don't like it for some reason (I can't think of any reason).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This Cleannote V4 -->is a ICS based ROM??
What is the similiar for JB based ROMS?
glennjj said:
This Cleannote V4 -->is a ICS based ROM??
What is the similiar for JB based ROMS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you digged a very old rom approx. 6month old.. go into android development section and look for your preffered rom having base as jb
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Supernexus 2.0. Awesome...
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
touchwiz roms like slimwizz or sva are the best,
in my experience.
they have constant 3 hours on screen time
compared to cm/aosp which is like 2h 30 mins max.

nightly of CM10 or Helly bean is better?

who can give me some advises about this
thank you!
IMO, helly. But not the most recent, I Ave read about people losing their imei's...
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
-SGA- said:
IMO, helly. But not the most recent, I Ave read about people losing their imei's...
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you
i dont care about warranty because my phone is out of date on warranty
This will be locked "best" is a matter of opinion download both and see what works best for your phone.
Also bad imei = means block from att service (i think).
Hell bean and cm10 are basicly the same thing.
Hell bean has datadata and cm10 doesn't
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
what do you mean CM10 doesnt have /datadata? does it mean it's laggy?
CheesyNutz said:
This will be locked "best" is a matter of opinion download both and see what works best for your phone.
Also bad imei = means block from att service (i think).
Hell bean and cm10 are basicly the same thing.
Hell bean has datadata and cm10 doesn't
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ap1618 said:
what do you mean CM10 doesnt have /datadata? does it mean it's laggy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no lag here
CM10 VS Helly
Helly is based of of CM10. you could even consider helly to be CM10 with devil kernal that about the only diffrence. I had lag on ICS without datadata but on JB it seems to work well without it, or at least not any slower
I stopped using helly (had imei problems with the latest builds but was able to fix it) in favor of the daily CM10 releases. I've had no problems with it so far at all. No lag problems without datadata as well.
I only switched because I'm a ROM addict and enjoy flashing my cappy with the latest release but it works well. I still use devil kernel 1.3.1 and again, works just great. No problems to speak of.
Helly bean. It's faster, far more stable and complete working feature wise, the included devil kernel is fast and flawless, and has the most devoted developer around here
None of the ICS ROMs had /datadata taken away... So you always had it...
fohdeesha said:
Helly bean. It's faster, far more stable and complete working feature wise, the included devil kernel is fast and flawless, and has the most devoted developer around here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yesterday i had problem with helly bean build at 20.8
my battery is quite low and i charge but it didn't recognize
then i had to plug usb to charg and flash slim bean 2.1
i fell HB is less stable!
I'm on official cm10 nightly with semaphore kernel. My cappy likes it a lot better than the hellybean versions.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
noone.dk01 said:
yesterday i had problem with helly bean build at 20.8
my battery is quite low and i charge but it didn't recognize
then i had to plug usb to charg and flash slim bean 2.1
i fell HB is less stable!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you flashed incorrectly. I'm amazed at the number of people that come in the hellybean thread asking why it's bootlooping when they didn't even bother to read the OP, stating that you must flash twice
Can't really go wrong with either.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2
I've been running CM10 with stock kernel for a few weeks now. I moved over from CM9 1.0 Stable.
Besides a few quirks (Google now lag, lock screen bugs) it works as a daily driver.
I've seen IMEI problems on both builds, I would just be careful when flashing and pull your SIM/check your IMEI before installing it again.
eternityends said:
I've been running CM10 with stock kernel for a few weeks now. I moved over from CM9 1.0 Stable.
Besides a few quirks (Google now lag, lock screen bugs) it works as a daily driver.
I've seen IMEI problems on both builds, I would just be careful when flashing and pull your SIM/check your IMEI before installing it again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you recommend switching from CM9 to CM10, despite the bumps you're talking of?
Personally, I enjoy the new features of CM10/Jelly Bean and can deal with the bugs. You could always wipe/flash back to CM9.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Im currently on latest helly bean and i do notice some lags like lockscreen stays dark greenish color then goes back to normal & sometimes it lags . I havent tried cm10 yet..maybe will give it a try later
I've ran a few versions of both. Luckily I have not had any trouble with my IMEI changin... yet. I find both run extremely well at first but with time and 100+ apps added both start to lag. Neither really run as flawless as some of the last cm9 builds I was on. I believe with time both will get better and hopefully run as well.
I am on the nightly builds of cm10. The performance it's amazing. The only down side is that the build seems to be increasing in size and the amount of apps that I'm able to install is limited to the size of the internal Rom space which is about (400 mbs).
Other than that I'm happier with the phone and I use our as my daily driver. Real fast and responsive.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app

Which is the best stable fast rom for I9000

Hello friends ,
As per your opinion which is the best rom for I9000
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Slim Bean, hands-down
swapk007 said:
Hello friends ,
As per your opinion which is the best rom for I9000
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to have stock Gingerbread on my SGS I9000. Then I switched to DarkyROM ICS, which was okay. After a while I came across the SlimRoms website, which was still developing Slim ICS at the time, so I flashed ICS, which was brilliant. Shortly after the Slim team started working on SlimBean, and after reaching a stable version I tried it for myself, a decision I am glad I made.
SlimBean is by far the lightest, fastest ROM I've used so far. Give it a try for yourself and you'll see how amazing, lag-free it is. I'm using version 3.1 with the Semaphore kernel version 2.6.2s.
Hi,
I've flashed many roms on my i9000 : Miui, cyanogen 7, Cyanogen 9, Jelly Bean, ICs..... but for me the best one is the JW8 SAUROM.
Stable, fast, GS3 Theme and a very good battery life !!
Since i am on this rom i don't want to flash another one !
Slim 3.1 with semaphore 2.6
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
swapk007 said:
Hello friends ,
As per your opinion which is the best rom for I9000
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
niggabyte said:
I used to have stock Gingerbread on my SGS I9000. Then I switched to DarkyROM ICS, which was okay. After a while I came across the SlimRoms website, which was still developing Slim ICS at the time, so I flashed ICS, which was brilliant. Shortly after the Slim team started working on SlimBean, and after reaching a stable version I tried it for myself, a decision I am glad I made.
SlimBean is by far the lightest, fastest ROM I've used so far. Give it a try for yourself and you'll see how amazing, lag-free it is. I'm using version 3.1 with the Semaphore kernel version 2.6.2s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
phiphi374 said:
Hi,
I've flashed many roms on my i9000 : Miui, cyanogen 7, Cyanogen 9, Jelly Bean, ICs..... but for me the best one is the JW8 SAUROM.
Stable, fast, GS3 Theme and a very good battery life !!
Since i am on this rom i don't want to flash another one !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1Ishara said:
Slim 3.1 with semaphore 2.6
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
roscatel said:
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank u all for the respons i will definately flash and check the above said roms...
swapk007 said:
thank u all for the respons i will definately flash and check the above said roms...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please hit thanks button no need to write thanks
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
There is no BEST, but Paranoid Android is preety cool
Do it to it
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
1Ishara said:
Slim 3.1 with semaphore 2.6
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But not alll stock rom 2.3.x can be flash with semaphore.. and not all i9000 can be flash with the same s/rom. But still semaphore 2.7.4 is the best way to get cwm. If flashi v semaphore causing boot failure, try to flash with other s/rom and re-flash semaphore.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
MintiIceCream said:
There is no BEST
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 ^^
I was on Hellybean (4.1.2) before I switch to beast rom (4.2.1).
It was pretty nice but the best rom it's up to you, try several rom
roscatel said:
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which AOKP ? (link)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
roscatel said:
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The idea of two developers was what I was thinking as well when I was making a decision either to stay on stock 2.3.6 or flash something new. CM9 is more "readable" for me in terms of numbering and Stable/Nightly/Experimental. Even tough I do not understand how come there is a stable version followed by nightly builds.
When watching some videos and screens of AOKP I felt it might be even better but I got confused in the numbering (which of the builds is the most stable as I need a working phone not a phone to be flashed twice a week).
For me the best ROM is SlimBean with Semaphore Kernel!:good:
Try latest androslim (JB 4.2.1)... its very smooth, responsive and very stable...
vigneshnallamad said:
Try latest androslim (JB 4.2.1)... its very smooth, responsive and very stable...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for noob question as im new in android os.. Was Androslim same or some sort based on slim rom?? Thanks in advanced
---------- Post added at 03:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:46 AM ----------
SeeDoubleYous said:
For me the best ROM is SlimBean with Semaphore Kernel!:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree!! As i also using it for my n7000 and i9000.. But i9003(my wife phone) always have prob with custom build rom....
I have flashed with slim rom 3.1
but when i do factory reset the phone goes in boot loops..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
C-Rom Mix V9 here - it's a near perfect ROM. Stable, everything is where it supposed to be. Very smooth operating. My last phone - XPERIA ARC S was destroyed (and its hardware is superior to that of i9000) - Galaxy - being slower by half is faster when speaking about this system operation. There are some hiccups with number recognition sometimes (like 1/10 phone calls and only till i pick up - so no showstopper for sure ). The camera is limited to just basic functions - but is working perfectly fine. The calendar is more basic than in ICS modded ROM for ARC S. The battery last for a day or less - but here i cannot say if the battery in my phone is just old or is this ROM (i got the phone used and the battery is 2,5 yo). And these are my only complaints - not much I have MUUUUUUUCH more complaints on every other stock/modded rom for Galaxy & ARC S
It's my daily ROM more than a week now.
kisses
There is no best but paranoid Android is so cool rom.
Sorry if the is some mistakes,but I'm trying out my new day typing touch pal keyboard. It's magnificent you guys try it out, it's free. Haha I wrote this message in about a minute lol.
Jelly Bean
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
guys try out AOKP milestone 1.
i think it is stable for me till now.

[Q] Suggest a ROM please

First of all, a million thanks for developers who are still working on this great device!
I have been using unofficial CyanogenMod 10.1 for vivo by dla5244. Haven't looked for anything else for quite some time, but now I am thinking of changing it. Could someone suggest any other no-Sense ROM? I need -
- Better or similar battery life
- Faster application launch
- More stability (less bug)
- and JellyBean at least
Thanks in advance...
Try CM 10.2 by szezso recently updated check the last page.
Or try CM 10.1 again by szezso with latest kernel on last page.
And the best ROM is again by szezso which CM10.
I would say try all of these and choose according to your use. But my vote goes to CM10 by szezso.
And I have tried all the ROMS available for this device
Iqbal Ansari said:
Try CM 10.2 by szezso recently updated check the last page.
Or try CM 10.1 again by szezso with latest kernel on last page.
And the best ROM is again by szezso which CM10.
I would say try all of these and choose according to your use. But my vote goes to CM10 by szezso.
And I have tried all the ROMS available for this device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot, Iqbal. Unfortunately, the problem is I don't have enough time and patience to try out all ROMs along with apps I use.
Could you tell me which of them gave you the best battery life, and also with which kernel?
What improvement I can expect with me coming from unofficial CM10.1 by dla5244?
Also, which kernel do you recommend with CM10 szezso especially?
Thank you once again!
ddsam said:
Thanks a lot, Iqbal. Unfortunately, the problem is I don't have enough time and patience to try out all ROMs along with apps I use.
Could you tell me which of them gave you the best battery life, and also with which kernel?
What improvement I can expect with me coming from unofficial CM10.1 by dla5244?
Also, which kernel do you recommend with CM10 szezso especially?
Thank you once again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already said CM10 is best.
CM10 by szezso with his latest kernel link: http://d-h.st/n9T
It has best battery life among all the kernels. The kernel is for CM10.1 but will work with all CM versions.
I use [ROM][CM11][4.4.1][KOT49E]VivoKat[Source-built][PMEM][BETA #5][12/12/2013]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2519414
egorlins said:
I use [ROM][CM11][4.4.1][KOT49E]VivoKat[Source-built][PMEM][BETA #5][12/12/2013]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2519414
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
072665995 said:
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But no deepsleep ---> lots of battery drain
Also beta#6 for Vivokat, SMS is broken but Szeszo says he will fix it for Beta #7
072665995 said:
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
couldn't agree more with this..
guys, suggest a stable build instead. Others might not be as adventurous as us who always eagerly to try out the latest release.
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest kernel can be used in any of those cm Roms. Same source is used for all kernels
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In engineering it's called a trade-off, in this case performance for battery life. Granted that there are a few bugs which, once fixed, will improve the situation but for know I guess that's the compromise you have to make (and hope that the developer can fix the bugs soon )
072665995 said:
But no deepsleep ---> lots of battery drain
Also beta#6 for Vivokat, SMS is broken but Szeszo says he will fix it for Beta #7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in beta6 sms is broken, but after intalled update sms still work fine, but update is with some bugs, maybe only my ics have that problems, but when i dongradet from beta7 to beta6 and sms still works
Szezso's Vivokat 4.3.1
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
sujeetpatwa said:
Szezso's Vivokat 4.3.1
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not making sense.
Vivokat is 4.4.2
and CyanVivo10.2 is running 10.3
Thanks for this thread, in terms of sense Roms what do you recommend?
I remember when I had this phone with sense3.5, nik 's Roms where the best. Then Android 4 came and after a while I gave the phone to my father. It is running arhd 6.0 but I find it a little sluggish. Any faster ROM that won't have bugs (since the phone is not mine I can't test them all) .
Just out of curiosity what version of Cm by Szezso Roms do you think it's the best,the one with 4.1.2, 4.2.2 or 4.3.1?I think 4.4.2 maybe with some problems right?
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Sense ROM's. ~ Try SVHD,
Szezso ROM ~ try CM10 (4.1)
Sent from my HTC Incredible S
I use Viper Vivo 2.5.3 Sense Rom and no sense Lacoste mod 4.2.2, it's clean, fast and stable.
Wysłane z mojego HTC Incredible S przy użyciu Tapatalka
Suggest a rom with best battery performance. I m currently using sense rom svhd n new battery (just two days old). N my battery backup is not that good as u can see it below
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources