ohsocreamy said:
As we know Anandtech published Nexus 4 benchmarks which show the phone underperforming significantly compared to its sister Optimus G. It appears they have since re-run the GLBenchmark tests and achieved much higher scores (in-line with the Optimus G) which they have not yet published.
You can analyse the full results here:
http://www.glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?benchmark=glpro25&D=Google+Nexus+4&testgroup=overall
Here is a brief summary of the main differences. They are very significant and the phone appears to perform as expected.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Result will be likely hitting screen cap of ~60fps.
With these new results here is how the phone would stack up against their published results for other models for the common Egypt HD Offscreen test:
Discuss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source (Reddit) , GLBench.
Mother of God.
Maybe now you benchmark lovers can finally stop *****ing? Please?
Someone explain this to me. lol
I'm much more interested in the battery life tests. Hopefully those have gotten better.
Slap-Yourself :) said:
Someone explain this to me. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Essentially new benchmarks show the Nexus 4 performing much better than previous ones.
rumthin said:
I'm much more interested in the battery life tests. Hopefully those have gotten better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, hopefully whatever changed to get these better results also will result in better battery life too.
Can't wait to hear what went wrong with the original results, and if the thermal throttling is going to become an issue.
Come on anandtech release an explanation already!!!
rumthin said:
I'm much more interested in the battery life tests. Hopefully those have gotten better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Although the new test suggests that the thermal throttling issues have ceased - meaning the CPU usage is more efficient and this should translate into big gains for battery life - I would like to see this confirmed.
Would shut a number of people up.
This is some really good news... Now I REALLY can't wait 'til the 13th.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Source? Don't see this posted anywhere on anandtech.
red12355 said:
Source? Don't see this posted anywhere on anandtech.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They posted the new results on GLBenchmark's site, assumedly they will be included in the full review of the Nexus 4.
EDIT: http://www.glbenchmark.com/resultsoflogin.jsp?login=anandtech&benchmark=glpro25
There you can see that Anandtech posted it, and the date.
red12355 said:
Source? Don't see this posted anywhere on anandtech.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Learn how to read!!!
It appears they have since re-run the GLBenchmark tests and achieved much higher scores (in-line with the Optimus G) which they have not yet published.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So as i said, something was indeed fishy with their preview.
Good to see it's solved though.
FISKER_Q said:
So as i said, something was indeed fishy with their preview.
Good to see it's solved though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
omg AS YOU SAID.
.... or as aaand and 200000 other people figured a copy paste phone should provide copy paste result.
MatAuc12 said:
omg AS YOU SAID.
.... or as aaand and 200000 other people figured a copy paste phone should provide copy paste result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That assumption could've been incorrect though as they are not a copy paste phone, definitely copy/paste hardware, but in theory the design could've been altered enough to be fatal for the thermals.
I was more going after the way they actually failed to properly document it.
For those of you who like me were wondering why these results were attributed to anand :
Click on the blue link for the test in question and it will bring up a list of logged tests. If you look on the right some are linked to anandtech's own GLBenchmark account.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming he didn't run those benchmarks with the Nexus 4 stuck in a freezer, that's really good news indeed. Hope the battery life will also see an improvement to get on par with Optimus G.
asasione said:
Learn how to read!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't there before the edit.
Anyway, thanks OP. Good to know that the n4 is performing up to spec.
just wow!
What is interesting are Benchmarks Anandtech released were done on November first, a day before this preview they released on the second, and some numbers match and others are vastly different. I am curious as to why this review was posted when it would seem obvious that something else was at issue and numbers from their own run the day before are skewed.
Where are all of the trolls now?
Tail between their legs?
Sent with my fingers using xda premium
Related
[APP] RogueTools v1.1 - [Overclock & Change Screen Density] - [Updated: 04/27/2010]
I now present you with RogueTools v1.1.
Summary:
This application is designed for the Vogue, Kaiser, Polaris and Nike devices. It allows you to dynamically overclock your device as well as change the screen density.
Requirements:
This application requires write access to your /system so this will only work on EXT2 and NAND installations.
Overclocking Notes:
Overclocking results will vary. Based upon the beta test results everyone was able to Overclock to 500mhz and have very stable results. Above this results really were mixed. Give it a try, I'd love to hear your results.
To download, search in the market for "RogueTools"
Screenshots:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Before (400mhz) and After (500mhz) CaffeineMark Benchmark
HUGE thanks to all of the beta testers. You guys did an outstanding job!:
citrit, cp0020, damianiw, DmK75, dzo, GriloVirante, Incubus26jc, inertone, jnadke, mblaster, Millence, mssmison, paipo, pyrator, scouzer, vrflyer
Disclaimer:
As always, I’m not responsible for anything that happens to your phone while using these files.
Future Versions:
I'm looking for some creative ideas on other additions you'd like to see added to this application. So if you have some thoughts, please let me know.
Changelog:
04/27/2010
Added device support for Nike
04/24/2010
Version 1
*Reserved*
Overclocking significantly reduce battery life?
sweet, I dont have to keep it secret anymore haha. Great job myn!! I havent had any issues with this in the month ive been using it.
fldash said:
Overclocking significantly reduce battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've kept mine clocked at 500mhz for the past couple of weeks and haven't noticed a huge degrade in battery performance.
What's your results been like Incubus?
myn said:
I've kept mine clocked at 500mhz for the past couple of weeks and haven't noticed a huge degrade in battery performance.
What's your results been like Incubus?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No difference in batterylife no matter what im clocking at. Do i need to upgrade? Is the final version changed from the version im using?
incubus26jc said:
No difference in batterylife no matter what im clocking at. Do i need to upgrade? Is the final version changed from the version im using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a few minor tweaks. Mostly cosmetic. Probably worth the upgrade anyways.
myn said:
I've kept mine clocked at 500mhz for the past couple of weeks and haven't noticed a huge degrade in battery performance.
What's your results been like Incubus?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt have any problems at all. ran faster/ battery life was good. like incubus said....don't have to keep it a secret anymore lol
oh noes i was forgotten as a beta tester lol
my results if anyone was wondering was a stable 550mhz 24/7.
I see you got the density changing script working?
Cool app.
scouzer said:
oh noes i was forgotten as a beta tester lol
my results if anyone was wondering was a stable 550mhz 24/7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
550mhz!?!?!?!?! you must not be on a vogue? lolol
scouzer said:
oh noes i was forgotten as a beta tester lol
my results if anyone was wondering was a stable 550mhz 24/7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am soo sorry scouzer . I feel like the biggest idiot.
I've updated the first post accordingly.
Sorry about that.
myn said:
I am soo sorry scouzer . I feel like the biggest idiot.
I've updated the first post accordingly.
Sorry about that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im the 2nd name mentioned. i feel special lol
cp0020 said:
im the 2nd name mentioned. i feel special lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its in alphabetical order special boy. lol
incubus26jc said:
its in alphabetical order special boy. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well........shut up!!! lol
thanks for ruining my moment haha
Will overclocking make my phone crap out any faster then not? Like bringing it up to 500mHz or where still stable won't make it run too hot and stuff? Just wonderin' cause my phone can get pretty warm with good web use and whatever...
Do want, though.
can someone post this app cuz i dont have data on my xv6900
aww come on i was a beta tester toooo lol
500mhz works wonders!
very very cool
corypaul said:
can someone post this app cuz i dont have data on my xv6900
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
plz anybody
Quadrant reading on my SGS ..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Can go higher ..
Yes, much higher and who uses quadrant any more?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
racerboy3801 said:
Yes, much higher and who uses quadrant any more?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I ran quadrant earlier for ****s and giggles. I forgot I have it installed, I just like the animations.
Sent from me.
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
haloimplant said:
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMFAO
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Without the stagefright tweak you can go up to 1800 . Just need to run the test few times And hope for the best. Also you can go with the stagefright tweak to 2500
I just had to.
reminds me a bit on DPS posing in WoW,....
hamti007 said:
reminds me a bit on DPS posing in WoW,....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was a rogue, I just cared about crits^^
to be back on topic:
quadrant is not reliable
Tweaking is like DJing, more loops don't automatically make it a better song
theduckking said:
Tweaking is like DJing, more loops don't automatically make it a better song
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But lots of flange and delay does!
Besides this, what are the reliable ones?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Antutu and Neocore.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
haloimplant said:
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks... that made me laugh
greeny2010 said:
Besides this, what are the reliable ones?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reliable ones? Benchmarks only test a specific workload.. You aren't testing how fast applications run, you are testing how fast the benchmark runs. There doesn't have to be a direct correlation
Auzy said:
Reliable ones? Benchmarks only test a specific workload.. You aren't testing how fast applications run, you are testing how fast the benchmark runs. There doesn't have to be a direct correlation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there had been no correlation then benchmarks wouldn't have been used at all, that's not accurate.
You can easily get over 3000 with an ext2 loopback ontop of ext4 plus an overclock. But that's beside the point.
What matters is how it feels and performs day to day, that's more personal opinion. Quadrant is virtually useless IMO.
If you want a "true" quadrant score for what the Galaxy S is capable of without cheating/overclocking, you're probably looking at between 1600-1800 depending on ROM and filesystem.
joegamal said:
If there had been no correlation then benchmarks wouldn't have been used at all, that's not accurate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said there wasn't. But, benchmarks are useless unless you actually know what you are testing..
Case in point, you have 1 program that does lots of writing (barely any reading), and a benchmark program.
If you increase reading speed by 6%, but decrease writing speed by 5%, a benchmark which treats reading and writing equally will give you a better score. Unfortunately, your app will be slower though. Of course, an increase in both will lead to a faster score, but so can other circumstances.
Most benchmarks aren't useless to everyone. Only to MOST users. Developers on the other hand who understand the benchmark and what they are optimising for, maybe would find them more useful..
In-game benchmarks although are useful out of the box, because they test performance of a specific workload/benchmarks. Every time someone optimises their phone to run a generic benchmark though, a kitten dies.
:/.
... ... ... ...
What ISP do you have? I'm guessing FIOS.
bconover93 said:
cause you pay $250/ month for epic internet
...i got 2.5 mbps w/ windstream :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hah, no... I pay $85/mo for my internet+TV.
jaszek said:
What ISP do you have? I'm guessing FIOS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, FiOS. I don't understand why it jumps like that for the download speed >.>.
If that's real, then I'm really impressed!
Sent from my HTC Desire
dexter93 said:
If that's real, then I'm really impressed!
Sent from my HTC Desire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea it's real. Here's one I just did:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I don't understand why the download speed jumps from being slow (for this test just now, it started at around 11, slowly creeping up to 40ish), then jump to incredible speed (jumped to ~400-500), and speedtest.net just randomly decides a number for the download result...
The number is an average, lol. Might be the way that fiber optics work. And I am super mad at Verizon for not offering FIOS in my area yet. I'm stuck with TWC @ 10 down and .5 up.
Worst "i've got fast broadband" thread ever.
DirkGently1 said:
Worst "i've got fast broadband" thread ever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean? The OP is wondering why when doing a speed test, his speed jumps around so much up to 200+ for no reason. I'm also wondering that.
DirkGently1 said:
Worst "i've got fast broadband" thread ever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um...
jaszek said:
What do you mean? The OP is wondering why when doing a speed test, his speed jumps around so much up to 200+ for no reason. I'm also wondering that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ That.
Mine is rather upsetting lol, then again, this isn't my computer.
DirkGently1 said:
Worst "i've got fast broadband" thread ever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry Dirk, I got it
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.....
conantroutman said:
Don't worry Dirk, I got it
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever it is, i hope it's not catching...!
Old Skool humour, we has it.
Does it do that on any other speed test sites, or even a different server on that one?
dkyle said:
Does it do that on any other speed test sites, or even a different server on that one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With close servers, yes. Servers very far, nope; it's just slow.
Other speed tests, like SpeakEasy and DSLReports, do do that also. DSLReports Java tests, however, are more stable (doesn't go up to the said 500ish, but only upto around 100 when it jumps).
Looks like your isp hits nitrous like in the fast and furious
DROID Incredible
OMFGB
Chads beta 8
Fcuk Apple. Nuff said.
What speed are you subscribed to. I don't know much about fios except we don't have it here. If its anything like charter and Comcast do though its probably a speed boost at the beginning of your download. It it is then a speed test that runs past the boost would show it slow back down some.
Mine is supposed to be 20 down
watt9493 said:
Looks like your isp hits nitrous like in the fast and furious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Made me laugh.
dkyle said:
What speed are you subscribed to. I don't know much about fios except we don't have it here. If its anything like charter and Comcast do though its probably a speed boost at the beginning of your download. It it is then a speed test that runs past the boost would show it slow back down some.
Mine is supposed to be 20 down[/URL]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
40down, 30up. When I'm downloading something big off direct connects, it caps out around 5-6MB/s and stays like that until completed download, which is around 40Mb/s, so I do get the full speed, but for speed tests, it jumps like that...
One possibility is that Verizon temporarily allocates more bandwidth to an individual user when the system is operating well below capacity (perhaps during off-peak hours), kinda like Comcast's Powerboost stuff that's advertised all the time. You could try testing during peak times and see what happens.
/not on verizon, wouldn't know for sure.
Delete..........
Sounds awesome! I will try ASAP and report back.
Only "improvement" I can see, is increased FPS number in Quadrant benchmark 3D tests, but score and performance looks same for me... Those 3D tests run and look same as they did before...
Confirm working What nice gaming experience ever!
Tenhi said:
Only "improvement" I can see, is increased FPS number in Quadrant benchmark 3D tests, but score and performance looks same for me... Those 3D tests run and look same as they did before...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not for me. Without this i got 2800 at first test with this directly 3100-3200.
nice one, stumbled over that thread some minutes ago and was going to post it too... beat me to it eh?
anyways, same here, no errors, works great, just try riptide gp :>
OMG !
now i got 65 fps in the planet test !
score 2700 > 3200
Running morfic's extra UV kernel, quadrant up a little, but the difference with the planets is huge. Looks lovely!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Ok great but does anyone know what that file actually does? Ok, if you remove it you get better fps in a benchmark but maybe it screws up something else
bgdxv said:
Ok great but does anyone know what that file actually does? Ok, if you remove it you get better fps in a benchmark but maybe it screws up something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why he tells you to back it up
bgdxv said:
Ok great but does anyone know what that file actually does? Ok, if you remove it you get better fps in a benchmark but maybe it screws up something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to delete some other files and see what else speeds up!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
bedalus said:
I'm going to delete some other files and see what else speeds up!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
wow using trinity 144 my quadrant went from 4500 to 2700. oops!
Tenhi said:
Only "improvement" I can see, is increased FPS number in Quadrant benchmark 3D tests, but score and performance looks same for me... Those 3D tests run and look same as they did before...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it does make a difference in quadrant score. here is a quadrant at 1440/1440 ondemand, using the trinity kernel, with the file removed. first, its 200 points higher than normal. 2nd, check out the insane 3D score..
bedalus said:
I'm going to delete some other files and see what else speeds up!
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol don't, there is a huge chance of braking something and having to reboot, also I hope you were joking, but in case you weren't:
I wasn't sure if deleting system32 helped that much so I just started pulling chips off the motherboard. Now it doesn't seem to be working at all?
Sent from my Nexus, fool
bedalus said:
I wasn't sure if deleting system32 helped that much so I just started pulling chips off the motherboard. Now it doesn't seem to be working at all?
Sent from my Nexus, fool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmmm weird, try pulling more chips off, they may be incompatible with the tweak.
WOW, it's cool for me!
Almost a year later and finally fixed Too bad lazy developer never just fixed quadrant in first place for NS
Got to luv XDA, much appreciated.
Does this only fix quadrant or does it actually help games also?
EDIT
tested
quadrant 3D bench finally works correctly. "Benchmark" is still **** though
Games performance ...its hard to tell since most games run smooth on NS
my gameloft FPS games seem slightly smoother but
would be able to tell if we could display fps while playing a game...lol fraps for android
Even though this does help in some cases its got to have some negative effects Elsewhere i mean you're removing what looks to be a system driver
someone with galaxy s phone with 2.3 should back up this file and upload here since galaxy s doesn't seem to have this problem with quadrant maybe just replacing file with Samsung driver will work also...idk
Would any body lucky enough to have picked up a new Nexus 7 32 GB, please run the Androbench benchmark on it, I'm curious to see if they have improved i/o performance.
Thanks
Same as the others
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
styckx said:
Same as the others
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, thanks, so is the model number still C90?
I am starting to think they've had this model for a while and didn't want to sell it right away.
Turbotab said:
OK, thanks, so is the model number still C90?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's C90 - build date is early Sept, which is why it was running 4.1.1 out of the box.
computingwarren said:
I am starting to think they've had this model for a while and didn't want to sell it right away.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't say ready, as in stuck in a warehouse, but they probably had option clauses in the contract to supply a 32 GB model, if certain conditions were met, price / QA / stocks levels of older devices etc.
Yes it's a C9O which means Sept build date.. My 16GB was a C8O and 100% perfect, and this 32GB is also 100% perfect.. No lift, no creeking, no dead pixels... Notta.
Edit: I See JohhnyHempSeed beat me to it. I had the reply window open for a bit
styckx said:
Yes it's a C9O which means Sept build date.. My 16GB was a C8O and 100% perfect, and this 32GB is also 100% perfect.. No lift, no creeking, no dead pixels... Notta.
Edit: I See JohhnyHempSeed beat me to it. I had the reply window open for a bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha, we have the same case too man :good:
see if the camera does 720p
heat361 said:
see if the camera does 720p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't - I used the 720p mod.
styckx said:
Yes it's a C9O which means Sept build date.. My 16GB was a C8O and 100% perfect, and this 32GB is also 100% perfect.. No lift, no creeking, no dead pixels... Notta.
Edit: I See JohhnyHempSeed beat me to it. I had the reply window open for a bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like little ol' Nexus is ready to take on the iFad mini, this forum is going to get messy post Christmas with all the new noob owners, refusing to use the search button.
Turbotab said:
Sounds like little ol' Nexus is ready to take on the iFad mini, this forum is going to get messy post Christmas with all the new noob owners, refusing to use the search button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh.. I don't mind new users.. I was new, you were new, everyone was new once and more than likey ( I know I did ) asked a million dumb questions.. Hell, I still ask the random dumb question now and then. :laugh: Android is a constant learning process.
Help a new user out today and he could be the guy (or girl) developing your next ROM tomorrow (figuratively speaking).
styckx said:
Eh.. I don't mind new users.. I was new, you were new, everyone was new once and more than likey ( I know I did ) asked a million dumb questions.. Hell, I still ask the random dumb question now and then. :laugh: Android is a constant learning process.
Help a new user out today and he could be the guy (or girl) developing your next ROM tomorrow (figuratively speaking).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't want to seem that I would not help any newcomers, I'd be happy to help, but when people don't do a little searching before asking a question, it does them a disservice.
Turbotab said:
Didn't want to seem that I would not help any newcomers, I'd be happy to help, but when people don't do a little searching before asking a question, it does them a disservice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha, and completely agree. :good:
A little faster
styckx said:
Same as the others
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I seem to have gotten a little faster. This is the 32GB + 3g model - after the 4.2 update, and then I did a factory reset. Took the benchmark before anything else was installed.
I guess I can't post a link as I haven't posted enough.
Image can be seen here: "www(dot)fearthepenguin(dot)net" at "/pics/misc/Nexus7-32gb-3g-benchmark.jpg"
# Micro-benchmark
Target: /data (ext4)
Use Buffer: No
SEQ RD: 26.28 MB/s
SEQ WR: 12.15 MB/s
RND RD: 1953.88 IOPS(4K)
RND WR: 145.82 IOPS(4K)
#SQLite benchmark
Insert: 51.06 TPS
Update: 58.83 TPS
Delete: 60.86 TPS
#Macro Benchmark
Target: /data (ext4)
Browser: 137.25 msec
Market: 268.25 msec
Camera: 305.75 msec
Camcorder: 751.5 msec
JohnnyHempseed said:
haha, we have the same case too man :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What case is that? Mine has straps over the corners of the nexus and I hate it!