Database Develop

Moto x vs maxx

I'm thinking about buying an X this week while I can still root. I'm coming from a razr maxx. I would like to go with another maxx but the extra $100 seems a bit steep. That along with many seem to think the 5" screen takes away from the crispness of the screen. Also it seems there are a few features better on the X.
Did any of you compare the 2 phones before making your decision? What made you go with the X over the maxx other than price?
Thanks for your replies.

Oaklands said:
I'm thinking about buying an X this week while I can still root. I'm coming from a razr maxx. I would like to go with another maxx but the extra $100 seems a bit steep. That along with many seem to think the 5" screen takes away from the crispness of the screen. Also it seems there are a few features better on the X.
Did any of you compare the 2 phones before making your decision? What made you go with the X over the maxx other than price?
Thanks for your replies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just exchanged my Maxx to get the MotoX last night. While the battery was great (and I'm sure I'd appreciate wireless charge/extra space), the moment I had the X in my hand it just felt right - the size and design is just perfect. The maxx was too large to hold *confidently* in one hand (I got used to it, but surely would eventually drop) and had sharp edges. Also the capacitive buttons are 1. always super bright which looks weird in the dark and 2. there is no menu button, so apps with older-style menu eats the screen with just a menu. The maxx is a great device with some nice features, but was the better phone for my needs.

Oaklands said:
I'm thinking about buying an X this week while I can still root. I'm coming from a razr maxx. I would like to go with another maxx but the extra $100 seems a bit steep. That along with many seem to think the 5" screen takes away from the crispness of the screen. Also it seems there are a few features better on the X.
Did any of you compare the 2 phones before making your decision? What made you go with the X over the maxx other than price?
Thanks for your replies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't have the choice since I am on AT&T but I have played with the Max and if given the choice would choose the X. Also if you are upgrading/adding a line, Best Buy has the Verizon Moto X for 99 bucks right now which is a great deal.

capathy21 said:
I didn't have the choice since I am on AT&T but I have played with the Max and if given the choice would choose the X. Also if you are upgrading/adding a line, Best Buy has the Verizon Moto X for 99 bucks right now which is a great deal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the heads up. I will probably go out to Verizon and look it over this evening, then go to Best Buy tomorrow, if I like it, to purchase.

Made my trip to Verizon today. I was really disappointed with the new line of Motorolas. I started using motorola phones back in the days of the startac. I switched 2 times, once to an HTC (not too bad and back before iPhones and Androids) and Samsung (also before the new stuff and the same bad reception). I just didn't see the X being much improvement over my razr maxx. I'm going to give the LG G2 a try. I'll have a couple weeks to give it a try. The signal was on a 5 and the X was on a 4 at the store. Good reception is important as I need it as a phone first for business and all the other features 2nd.
I know the bars don't always tell the story but I couldn't run db tests. The big, clear screen made a nice addition for my aging eyes.
I appreciate everyone's input.

Really interested in the Moto X...

So I just bought an LG G2 on Verizon last Saturday for $550 and while I love the phone, the Moto X is really tempting me to return my G2 and buy an X instead. I've already got CM10.2 on here so its nearly the same as what the Moto X is running and can currently get around 5-7 hours of screen on time with 19-24+ hours off the charger.
From what I've read, the Moto X gets fantastic battery life and despite its lesser specs, it still performs wonderfully which I've witnessed first hand. And the fact that the camera is no longer complete garbage is a huge plus as well. I'm not a big camera guy, but when I use it I need it to take good pictures.
So, do you guys think I should keep the G2 or return it for a Moto X? Really struggling with this decision and could use some insight. Has anyone else been in a similar situation?

Just ordered one yesterday when I saw jcase had an updated root method. I currently have an mdk s4 but the phone is just too big and I don't like capacitive buttons. To me it's just a matter of build quality... The s4 feels big and cheap and after playing with the x it doesn't even compare
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2

I owned the G2 for tmobile before I switched to ATT Moto X. Best decision ever.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

I just got my MotoX a few days ago (coming from a Gnex). I cant believe I didnt get this phone 2 months ago. Best phone I've had thus far. I am on the phone for alot of hours during the work week. Probably 100+ calls per day. I have never been able to not have to charge a phone mid way through the day before. I got home today with 23% batt left, with 15hrs of charger and 4.5 hrs of screen time, 4 hrs of calls.
I thought i wanted a larger screen phone, dont think I ever will now.
A friend of mine has an S4. Even though the S4 with CM10.2 gets higher "benchmarks", the fluidity of the stock moto x is much better. It is just a better overall experience. Like I said, not sure why I didnt get this phone 2 months ago.

magicriggs said:
I owned the G2 for tmobile before I switched to ATT Moto X. Best decision ever.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you like better?
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk

barondebxl said:
What do you like better?
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay I was running stock on the G2. I liked the knock on feature on the G2 but it was inconsistent. The UX felt very much like touchwizz and even tho it was quad core, I noticed some lag. The one thing I like more on the G2 over the X is the screen and camera.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

magicriggs said:
Okay I was running stock on the G2. I liked the knock on feature on the G2 but it was inconsistent. The UX felt very much like touchwizz and even tho it was quad core, I noticed some lag. The one thing I like more on the G2 over the X is the screen and camera.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, there is some occasional lag on the G2 but overall it's pretty fast I think. I'm also intrigued by the moto x but the AT&T version has no development.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk

barondebxl said:
True, there is some occasional lag on the G2 but overall it's pretty fast I think. I'm also intrigued by the moto x but the AT&T version has no development.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro if your rocking stock on the G2 then you'll love Moto X stock. Pretty much straight vanilla with useful tweaks. Active notifications is awesome with that touchless control and moto connect. And these tweaks are flawless not a single issue.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

magicriggs said:
Bro if your rocking stock on the G2 then you'll love Moto X stock. Pretty much straight vanilla with useful tweaks. Active notifications is awesome with that touchless control and moto connect. And these tweaks are flawless not a single issue.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not too much of a stock android guy, I like custom UIs and I'm running cleanrom XE on the G2, it's pretty solid with insane battery life. But I like to try new phones so maybe I'll give a shot to the moto x
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk

I got ya bro
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

See I just don't know if it's worth it when I'm already running stock Android on my G2 with no problems while also getting crazy battery life. It's just something about the Moto X is drawing me towards it, not to mention that Verizon is rumored to be getting MotoMaker on Nov 11th. My main concern, just like another user said, is that development doesn't seem that active for the Verizon variant. Or maybe I'm just blind?

I'm also waiting for Verizon to have access to Moto Maker (need at least 32GB of internal memory of I can't have an SD card) with fingers crossed that the wooden backs will be an option at that time.
Sent from my VZW SGS3 rockin' Jelly 'Beans' Build 17 using Tapatalk 2

I've had pretty much every high end phone and I love the moto x. I bought a iPhone 5s only because they just happen to have a gold one while I was there. I sold that, made my profit, and went back to buy the moto x. I really can't think of anything negative to say about it.

dsimages said:
I just got my MotoX a few days ago (coming from a Gnex). I cant believe I didnt get this phone 2 months ago. Best phone I've had thus far. I am on the phone for alot of hours during the work week. Probably 100+ calls per day. I have never been able to not have to charge a phone mid way through the day before. I got home today with 23% batt left, with 15hrs of charger and 4.5 hrs of screen time, 4 hrs of calls.
I thought i wanted a larger screen phone, dont think I ever will now.
A friend of mine has an S4. Even though the S4 with CM10.2 gets higher "benchmarks", the fluidity of the stock moto x is much better. It is just a better overall experience. Like I said, not sure why I didnt get this phone 2 months ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the benchmark tests are BS. They provide some insight into things, but as many reviews of phones have pointed out, the moto x actually does better in a lot of areas in real tests than other high end phones with better processors. I think the moto dev team worked hard to create a phone with lower specs that works faster than other phones because of all the new coding and filing systems they put into the device. This is also one of the reasons that development isn't as fast. A bunch of things are new to the dev community that moto was using and it will take some learning. I bet a lot of phones move to this type of coding and processors running their own thing, which will then make dev easier for phones like this.
hashcode said in his forum on SS that this was the hardest device he worked on getting SS to run properly with. How the system is set up and runs commands is different from other phones so benchmarks are not really benchmarks ya know. They are old benchmarks used just to test a processor, not a phones ability to perform tasks in real life. It's real life benchmarks beat out the htc one in many respects.

I have this phone and totally love it! I have hd every phone you could imagine all the galaxys, htc one, lg's all the iphones except 5s and it is the best phone I have ever had. I have a Nexus 5 coming and I may just return to sender because of how much this phone just works

AndreaCristiano said:
I have this phone and totally love it! I have hd every phone you could imagine all the galaxys, htc one, lg's all the iphones except 5s and it is the best phone I have ever had. I have a Nexus 5 coming and I may just return to sender because of how much this phone just works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You had the G2 too? And you still think the Moto X is better? Reasons? Thanks in advance!

bd1212 said:
You had the G2 too? And you still think the Moto X is better? Reasons? Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It feels about a million times better in hand.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

I just recently purchased a Moto X, coming from a motorola Atrix 4G and I'll tell you why...
Motorola has always made good hardware. They have a integrated circuit and electronics division that creates very robust designs. Their consumer and industrial hardware has been top of the line since the beginning days of the 2-way handheld radio. They make good hardware. Solid and rugged stuff.
Now, the Atrix had some problems regarding software support. It was never officially updated past gingerbread. I was fine using the kernel that was developed, although it wasn't perfect. This was a major issue for many that pushed them away from Motorola. I still loved the ruggedness of the once-flagship phone.
However, now that Google and Motorola Mobility are one, I feel there is a good chance this will not be as big of an issue in the future. I really feel we will have the best of both worlds with Motorola now -- excellent hardware as well as long term software support (whatever long term really means nowadays). At least, it's a 'risk' I'm willing to take.
So far, I am extremely happy with my Moto X.

I was an android convert from an iPhone 5. I started with the G2, it was a pretty nice phone but I couldn't get used to the size. I operate my phone with one hand most of the time and couldn't secure it well. The actual hardware was nice. I switched to the moto X four days later. I can wholehearted say that I don't miss ANYTHING on the G2. I really do like all the features that Motorola built into the X and Android.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

I too had a LG G2 and returned it for a Moto X on verizon. My main concerns were lesser battery life and camera.... and, a little bit of a concern was the smaller screen size. I too also had rooted and placed CM10.2 on the phone.
My comparisons....
G2 Pros:
1) Screen is slightly nicer/crisper on the G2. Not by much, but it's noticeable to me.
2) Screen size was nice to have... not a deal breaker, but nice to have.
3) More development community.
4) Battery life was AMAZING
5) Camera was very solid
G2 Cons:
1) Back buttons!!!! If the LG G2 had not decided to place the buttons on the back, I would still have that phone.
2) Knock-on feature, while useful, didn't work all the time. So, you have to pick up the device and try and find the damn back buttons to check a notification. Or look like an idiot stabbing a black screen.
3) Slimy back. I felt like this thing would fall out of my hand. Please note, I really don't care what the phone is made of. I've owned the Note 2 and didn't feel the same way as with the G2. G2 was just slick in comparison.
4) cheezy LG UI. Why can't they just do like Motorola and improve camera/knock-on stuff and leave the stock apps to google?!?
Moto X Pros:
1) Form factor and build quality is really fantastic. Feels so good in the hand that the screen size argument vanishes.
2) Sound/speaker quality is noticeably better than any phone I've had. A little strange that I noticed this, but I've seen it mentioned before from others as well.
3) Active notifications are pretty handy, and am quickly getting used to them.
4) Always listening device... verdict still out on this, perhaps a bit gimmicky.
5) Prefect implementation of AOSP. improved in some areas, and left everything else alone! Hence, no needing for new ROMs. Root, yes. But only for Xposed stuff.
Moto X Cons:
1) Battery not up to par with LG G2... but very good. I get a full day and I'm a heavy user.
2) Camera not quite as good compared to the G2... but the sensor is faster...perhaps a tradeoff.
Anyhow, I think the Moto X is a winner. The fact that I had to

moto x worth the upgrade???

I have the razor maxx hd (xt926) and thought that kitkat was going to be released by the end of the first quarter....... so far still no OTA on verizon here in Wisconsin. I have played w the X and really don't like not having the smart actions, and the app they have for that is okay..... it doesn't have the ability to add more actions...... so I guess another smart action type app would need to be found. !?!?! Thats easy i guess.....
Or, do I root the Maxx hd and call it a day? There are a lot of nice features on the X but I was holding out to see what Lenovo and Moto come up with after the X.
Waiting on the software update is starting to really upset me when I can't get an answer to when the update is gonna be available. So to sum it all up..... what wold you all do??? Keep the maxx or order a X????
Please and thank you.

If you're gonna buy the X....then sell it in a few months for the x2 or whatever....I'd wait.
If the x meets your needs for the next while, get it. Its better than what you have now.
Basically its your needs that matter. No one here can decide for you.
Read up.....and decide. ?
Sent from my N5, N7, Moto X, G Tab 3 or S2.....

I had the Maxx HD with an unlocked bootloader, a couple months ago I got the X and gave the Maxx HD to my wonderful mother. To me, the difference isn't that huge, and I do miss the battery life I got with the Maxx HD. Having said that, the Moto X is a great phone, honestly I don't think you can lose no matter what you decide. Good luck!
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

I'm kind of disappointed in moto for promising kitkat to a few of the older droids and not delivering quickly like they did 4.4 on the Moto X. Just saying, if I had an hd or m I'd be more than a little irked.
-Slim Nexus 10-

rocketsaucev2 said:
I'm kind of disappointed in moto for promising kitkat to a few of the older droids and not delivering quickly like they did 4.4 on the Moto X. Just saying, if I had an hd or m I'd be more than a little irked.
-Slim Nexus 10-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Us on at&t were waiting for the 4.4.2 update and were the last to get it...
Sent from my XT1058 using xda premium

I also had the Razr Maxx HD. The only reason I upgraded was because I wanted to try the phone out for a couple days. I got it for free through Best Buy since another line on my plan had an upgrade available. I do like the phone and I kept it. I gave my rooted/unlocked Razr Maxx HD to a friend of mine, but I don't think he's activated it yet.
As one of the other posters said, I miss the extra battery life of the Maxx HD...but these days I'm usually ALWAYS around a charger. The few times out of the year that I go camping I can bring an external battery to give the phone a charge. Rooting it was also much more of a process for me than the Maxx HD since you can't unlock the bootloader. Also, I never did use the HDMI port on my Maxx, so losing that didn't bother me. My SD card that I had only contained my titanium backups and other things like photos. Now I auto-upload my photos/videos to Dropbox so the limited 16Gb of space hasn't affected me yet. I actually almost enjoy it since it keeps me from keeping un-used applications on the phone.
The biggest advantage I noticed is that when I was switching between apps a lot, the Maxx kind of started slowing down (probably due to only 1Gb of RAM). I haven't noticed this yet with the Moto X since it has double the memory. For me it was a no brainer to try it out since it was free, and didn't take my line's upgrade away. In less than a year I'll be able to upgrade again if I wish. I love the fact that the screen size is the same as the Maxx and yet the phone still feels super small! I don't need a 5+ inch screen on my phone.
The Maxx HD is definitely a tank. I didn't put a case on it and it held up fine through drops, however I did decide to put a Speck case on my Moto X. It's so light it feels like it would break easier. If I were you, I would probably stay with the Maxx HD and see how the 4.4 update is (when it finally comes). I'm guessing sometime in May/June. The Maxx is a great phone and if my friend didn't need mine (he broke his Razr HD) I would have definitely kept it for a backup phone.

locked VZ S4 -> Dev Moto X, Is this a good idea?

I have 1 year left on my contract and on my S4, but I use none of the special S4 features and am tired of a locked down phone. I am thinking of moving over to a moto X, and was just hoping for any and all feedback.
X+1
I am waiting for the Sept 4th announcement to do anything, But I expect the X + 1 dev edition to cost too much (anything much over $500 and I will be seriously thinking, over $600 and I am out for sure.)
I am hoping to have the new phone I get cost roughly similar to a new phone on contract after I subtract the money made by selling my nearly mint S4 (hoping $250-$300?)
About me:
I don't play games, I just need web browsing, FB, music player, view the occasional document, ect..
I am not an obsessive flasher. I want root/custom recovery to give me the option of managing my own updates. Mostly having a recent OS and the option to flash minor modifications such as offered by xposed framework or stock based roms is my biggest concern.
I use none of my touchwiz fanciness, automated things that go off automatically tend to annoy me (not sure about that voice control in this regard though it sounds cool),
Why Moto x?
Active display, Moto's payment plan, unlocked BL, as well as the "grown up" focus on solid performance and ergonomics is what appeal to me. My S4's specs already seem to be more then I need, and if the Moto X can be as snappy or more then my S4 while giving me an up to date phone for the next year and a half I will be content. (Should be out of school and making decent money by then?)
Why not s4?
I feel like the S4 has more flash then I can appreciate, while being slightly uncomfortable, having annoyingly poor build quality and a fairly bleak future for the modding community... And that at least for now I could move to a moto X for the cost of a new contract phone, but with out contract and with an unlocked bootloader to boot.
Not sure on this one though, and a little worried about being happy still with a Moto X a year from now... So trying to get a wide variety of opinions on this.

What carrier? If Vzw go for a Maxx it is already a x + 1/2! Lol.

aviwdoowks said:
What carrier? If Vzw go for a Maxx it is already a x + 1/2! Lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is VZ, but I thought the Maxx was no longer available as a dev edition?
If I didn't make it clear enough, the majority of the reason I am getting rid of the S4 is jumping through hoops with updates, and wanting a device that is guaranteed unlocked on Verizon.

scryan said:
It is VZ, but I thought the Maxx was no longer available as a dev edition?
If I didn't make it clear enough, the majority of the reason I am getting rid of the S4 is jumping through hoops with updates, and wanting a device that is guaranteed unlocked on Verizon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really. I did not know that.

I just got Dev edition, moto web sight $324. I also have S 4, I bought the x for better reception, so far been really good.
Sent from my XT1060 using XDA Free mobile app

roze658 said:
I just got Dev edition, moto web sight $324. I also have S 4, I bought the x for better reception, so far been really good.
Sent from my XT1060 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah it looks like I just missed the $324 but I am going to call up and talk with customer service to see what they can do. Just waiting to hear back about the moto playment plan.
Can you talk more about the differences in your experience with each device? Just kind of general which one you like more and how the moto has been... I like what I hear about reception, seems like mine is never quite good enough.

I pretty much use the phone like you, I like my S 4 mdk for battery life and tweeks with custom kernel, but Samsung radio's have poor reception. I've owned Motorola phones in the past reception has always been good with moto. This is why I purchased.
Sent from my XT1060 using XDA Free mobile app

I feel the X screen is too dim/variable compared to the Maxx. Root is not necessary on the Maxx, to me, anyway.
---------- Post added at 07:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:33 PM ----------
+++
Signal is great on any Moto.

I love my VZW X DE. Had a non-DE maxx, sold it cause i lost root after taking 4.4
Performance and battery life are awesome. Im sure this device will please me for at least the next year, or until i have enough spare cash to justify an upgrade

One thing to note, is that if the O.P. browses through the development forums for the Moto X, there are not very many ROM's. If you love to flash something new every few days, then you might be disappointed.
However, the reason that there aren't very many ROM's is because the stock experience is so good - for the things you listed - active display, Moto Assist, etc. that don't work in AOSP based Rom's. A stock, debloated ROM with xposed is really all that is needed to have a fantastic device!
I wouldn't be surprised if the Moto X dev editions get cheap again after the Sept 4th press conference, or at the very least, I expect Swappa/Ebay to have several after that date Maybe even mine

I just switched from an S4 to a Moto X developer and I am very pleased. I took advantage of the $324 sale they had on the Moto X developer edition.
Sent from my XT1053 using Tapatalk

[Q] Moto X or Droid Turbo

Hey all,
So I'm due for a phone. Currently using the HTC DNA on Verizon.
I was all about the Moto X(2014) until I heard about the Droid Turbo, which looks pretty sweet.
These are my concerns:
Moto X will probably have a larger Dev community, as the turbo is a Verizon exclusive.
The Turbo will probably have a lot more bloat than the Moto X.
The Moto X boasts a 'Pure' android experience, and while nothing has been speculated software wise on the turbo, it will likely be similar, but with a **** ton of Verizon bull****.
Does the higher resolution screen, extra gig of ram and faster processor worth it?
What are your suggestions?
Thanks

rjd584 said:
The Moto X boasts a 'Pure' android experience, and while nothing has been speculated software wise on the turbo, it will likely be similar, but with a **** ton of Verizon bull****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There will be no difference on bloat. The turbo may have extra droid stuff (like circle widgets and that zap thing) but moto X on vzw still comes with vzw bloat (this is based on my 2013 X having vzw bloat)

The new X has 8 Verizon apps. I have disabled 5 of them. Verizon Voicemail can not be disabled. I use the hotspot app and the Verizon mobile app to check data usage.

I'd add another phone into the mix, supposed rumors detail the Nexus 6 is coming to Verizon.
http://pocketnow.com/2014/10/02/verizon-nexus-6

rjd584 said:
Hey all,
So I'm due for a phone. Currently using the HTC DNA on Verizon.
I was all about the Moto X(2014) until I heard about the Droid Turbo, which looks pretty sweet.
These are my concerns:
Moto X will probably have a larger Dev community, as the turbo is a Verizon exclusive.
The Turbo will probably have a lot more bloat than the Moto X.
The Moto X boasts a 'Pure' android experience, and while nothing has been speculated software wise on the turbo, it will likely be similar, but with a **** ton of Verizon bull****.
Does the higher resolution screen, extra gig of ram and faster processor worth it?
What are your suggestions?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are sticking with Verizon, then the Droid. better specs, better screen, better battery. But going back to carrier lock and carrier bloat is not something I am willing to do after leaving Sprint last year. I'll be activating an X or Nexus on either T-mo or Cricket soon. Can always walk away if I'm not happy.

I bet the screen brightness will push many to the Turbo. More juice to allow a brighter display. So it was with the X/Maxx dilemma.

FYI: The manual for the Turbo leaked.
http://gizmodo.com/leaked-droid-turbo-manual-shows-a-super-powered-motorol-1644058683

I went with the X because I don't like the droid branding or the fact that it has capacitive navigation buttons, like the galaxy phones still cling to.

The one benefit of capacitive is that they can't burn in at least. I got the new moto x and love it. Might still get the Note 4 instead though. I'd rather have a 16 mp camera on Samsung then a 21 with bad software. That's the only ring Motorola can't get to be great. Camera software.

Ah man, I'm on day 13 of moto x 2014 and now news of droid turbo leaks. Better battery, hopefully more storage and same software features. Thinking about returning moto x to wait for turbo.

Turbo has good specs, but looks like moto went back in time 5 years in the design department

svtfmook said:
Turbo has good specs, but looks like moto went back in time 5 years in the design department
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but I'll take specs over looks as long as it still feels good in the hand/pocket.
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Free mobile app

Function over form:
Returning my moto x. I love it, but the entire package is way better on the turbo. It seems exactly like a 5 inch version of the nexus 6. I even set up an exchange for a different moto x yesterday and I contact moto today to get my money back.

Droid life is reporting that the battery code listed on the Turbo benchmark sheet relates to a 3,900mAh battery spotted in China.
Not too shabby.
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Free mobile app

I ended up returning my moto x, hopefully these droid turbo rumors prove to be true.

Yeah, function over form, but who can feel performance difference over any flagship device out this month? I have an iPhone 6, moto x, M8 and they all perform the same. The only draw back I have is the camera on the x sucks, like really really bad and no good cases for the x. Otherwise, I like the near pure android experience of the x over sense and iOS. And the x just looks so much better than the other 2

The only reasoning I have to keep my moto x is that it's the pure edition so it will most certainly get updates quicker than the droid and it's rocking and unlocked bootloader

robstunner said:
The only reasoning I have to keep my moto x is that it's the pure edition so it will most certainly get updates quicker than the droid and it's rocking and unlocked bootloader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the Turbo ill most assuredly have a locked bootloader, be almost impossible to Root, and probably never see anything past Android L.
But dear god, those specs.

Coronado is dead said:
Yes, the Turbo ill most assuredly have a locked bootloader, be almost impossible to Root, and probably never see anything past Android L.
But dear god, those specs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just hoping that att version that went through the FCC is legit.

hopesrequiem said:
The one benefit of capacitive is that they can't burn in at least. I got the new moto x and love it. Might still get the Note 4 instead though. I'd rather have a 16 mp camera on Samsung then a 21 with bad software. That's the only ring Motorola can't get to be great. Camera software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Burn in? Lol. These aren't plasma TV screens.