Poor benchmark performance after 5.01 dirty flash - Nexus 6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Ive just done a dirty flash of the 5.01 update -
Through fastboot I flashed system, boot loader and used the decrypted boot image.
Just run antutu & geekbench 3 and found the final score is pretty naff. Anyone else had similar or know why it might be?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Looked at better battery stats and noticed it was stuck at 1.7ghz. Does the nexus automatically limit the cpu when the battery is low?? I didn't enable battery saving mode

Amos91 said:
Ive just done a dirty flash of the 5.01 update -
Through fastboot I flashed system, boot loader and used the decrypted boot image.
Just run antutu & geekbench 3 and found the final score is pretty naff. Anyone else had similar or know why it might be?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guaranty that your issue is your own fault. first off, i bet you just left the cpu speed as is(stock) then ran a benchmark test. well, guess what? that is the wrong way to benchmark. what cpu speed did the benchmarks run at? ill tell you, you have no idea. thats because itll vary however it feels like in between the max and minimum cpu speed tested. so, you couldve been testing a run at 1.5ghz instead of the 2.6 you thought you were using.
to run a benchmark properly, you have to set the max cpu and the min cpu to the max speed you want to test. or youll end up testing a lower speed. and if you are running stock, thatll be very hard for you since stock uses mpdecision. mpdecision will change your cpu speeds, even if you set them.
---------- Post added at 06:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:30 PM ----------
Amos91 said:
Looked at better battery stats and noticed it was stuck at 1.7ghz. Does the nexus automatically limit the cpu when the battery is low?? I didn't enable battery saving mode
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, at 20% or lower it reduces cpu speeds and amount of cores used.

My stupidity then. For some reason I didn't think it limited unless manually set to saver mode.

Amos91 said:
My stupidity then. For some reason I didn't think it limited unless manually set to saver mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup. and at the moment, it automatically does this on custom roms as well.

Related

[Q] Stock Captivate voltage

Hello,
I'm curious as to the stock voltage of the captivate's CPU at 1Ghz. I've done some searching, and can't find it anywhere (maybe I'm looking in all the wrong places)
Because my 24/7 setup is:
Cyanogenmod 7
Launcher7
Glitch v13.1 kernel
1.4Ghz @ 1.325v
1.3Ghz @ 1.275v
1.2Ghz @ 1.25
1Ghz @ 1.2v
stock down the board from here
I/O scheduler: noop
Conservative governor
I'm just curious as to how much damage I'm doing to the chip, I'm not sure if 1.275v is the stock 1Ghz, just came here to check.
Thanks
(With the phone at 1.4 and running cyanogenmod, it absolutely screams, scores >2700 points in quadrant. It's no sgs2, but it holds its own)
1ghz stock is 1275mV
Here you go with all the defaults
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks guys
I remember reading somewhere that 1300mv was the max safe voltage.
mrhaley30705 said:
I remember reading somewhere that 1300mv was the max safe voltage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you source that for me? I normally run 1.325 for 1.4
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Fear of Oneself said:
Could you source that for me? I normally run 1.325 for 1.4
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard from someone else that told me where he heard it. I don't know where you might be able to find official documentation on it. You could always email Samsung.
Technically anything past 1275mV and you are shortening the life expectancy. Don't really need to know much more than that. Simple rule about OC any device. More voltage and/or heat the more you kill the life of it. Since no one knows "that" number per device it comes down to how much you are willing to gamble on it.
prbassplayer said:
Technically anything past 1275mV and you are shortening the life expectancy. Don't really need to know much more than that. Simple rule about OC any device. More voltage and/or heat the more you kill the life of it. Since no one knows "that" number per device it comes down to how much you are willing to gamble on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. Electromigration would take years on the 40 (or 45, I forget) nanometer chip, especially if it does not maintain that clock constantly. And temperature remains at hand because it only peaks at 1.4 in short bursts.
Thanks for the reply, I think I'll just keep it where I have it and not go any higher.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App

new quadrant scores on old stones and droids

I haven't been using my stone for a while now, but upon running latest Quadrant I was kind of surprised by the low CPU score of only 348. I clearly remember getting more on this benchmark.
Can anyone post some screenshots of their stones (or droids) and the ROM they are using?
I am using CM 7.2.2
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I'm also using CM7.2.2 with 2nd boot and 512MB swap partition
Code:
swap on swap off
Similar overall score - but totally different CPU and I/O ratings.
Strange...
Edit:
Result on the right side taken without swap partition.
Seems to really impact I/O
Yeah swap is great. You can even run more demanding games since this old PowerVR can still put some decent performance. I tried NOVA1, PES 2012, Dead Space and Temple Run. They all run great compared to my Xperia mini pro. The only difference is the occasional lag from swapping, but I think class 10 card will improve on this. Will try later.
I ran the Antutu benchmark and I got very low FPU score while the CPU score is normal. I thought maybe its some glitch with the latest CM7 so I flashed 4 older version, but no improvement. So far I tried 7.2.2, 7.2.1, 7.2.0 and 7-20012007. Its all the same. Its not only the score that worries me its also the choppines when scrolling through home screens, when entering drawer etc. Something is wrong. I will try stock rom later and I will try to change the OR maybe it has something to do with it.
That FPU score is probably normal. I get the same (159-162) on both CM7 and CM10. On CM10 2D rendering gets low scores - about 280 while on CM7 it is over 400. Database score seems low. On CeBits results CPU is low, I've been getting over 1300 (on quadrant) on both CM7 and CM10 (stock (kabaldan's stock) overclock values).
Done and done. I flashed vulnerable CFT with RSD Lite, formated the SD card, reinstalled OR3.3 and flashed the new CM7.2 with swap support. Its fine now. I don't know why it didn't fix itself with reflashing CM7 roms, but it didn't. Maybe it was the old OR that was causing problems I don't know.
cm-7-20121007-UNOFFICIAL-umts_sholes
Compcache RAM 18%
thanks for your results!

[Q] Horrible Benchmark Score

Stock rom my note 4 scored 25417 in antutu. Thought wtf and tried testing again with the custom Skyfall rom, almost the exact same results.
Is my note 4 messed up? Should I do a device exchange?
Any thoughts or advice would be appreciated.
Are you letting your phone cool down before benching? Putting it in the freezer? (Real questions) I personally won't return a phone because of low benchmark that means nothing in the real world other than to show off. P.S.my first bench was in the 30ks
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
No, my phone was sitting idle for a good amount of time though before testing.how could my scores be so drasticly less than yours?
Nikknak said:
Stock rom my note 4 scored 25417 in antutu. Thought wtf and tried testing again with the custom Skyfall rom, almost the exact same results.
Is my note 4 messed up? Should I do a device exchange?
Any thoughts or advice would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heres the thing . You shouldnt rely on that benchmark score at all especially on custom ROMs . I have had Roms that performed amazing in everyway and tested poorly on benchmark . There are a lot of factors that decide your score and in some ways scores can be cheated . Others on XDA can explain better than I can but you need to try other ROMS and also try when your phone isnt hot as He$$
---------- Post added at 05:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:20 PM ----------
Nikknak said:
No, my phone was sitting idle for a good amount of time though before testing.how could my scores be so drasticly less than yours?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also did you run benchmarks when you are on Stock only ? To compare?
Mines is 46512. Stock Rom, Rooted.
Maybe it's a running app that causing the low score.
Do you notice any lag? Gaming lag?
Mine was low too until I turned off power saving mode
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
I just tested mine while downloading a file in the background and scored 43K. Maybe you have something going on in the background that's a CPU hog. I'm on Stock but rooted.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk 2

CPU freq problem

Hello everyone,
I am running the latest stable firmware (10.2.24.0) and have noticed a weird behaviour regarding this device's minimum CPU frequency.
After starting up the device fresh, the minimum CPU States available are 576MHz for the small cores and 710 MHz for the big cores.(Screenshot)
After a day or two of use, the minimum CPU freq changes to 1036 MHz for the small cores and 1056 MHz for the big cores resulting to increased battery consumption. I cannot find what triggers this behaviour and the only way to make lower freqs available again is to reboot the device....
I believe there is something wrong with the device kernel, possibly something regarding the way the governor works.
I suggest we make some poll to see how many of you face this problem and maybe we can address it to Xiaomi.
I use cpu-z for accessing the CPU states. Can you please check and give me a feedback of the minimum CPU frequency you witness;
Thank you!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my MI 9 using Tapatalk
There are widespread complaints about the poor battery life and high idle drain on the MI 9. It's probably caused by the Snapdragon 855 since it's a new CPU but Qualcomm makes the firmware for their chips so a fix likely needs to come from them. Most people think the problems are with network searching which would indicate that there's a problem with the modem that hopefully can be fixed in a firmware update. You're the first person I know of that has suggested an issue with how the CPU cores are utilized. I think there are a couple of custom kernels in the dev thread if you think that's the problem.
I have also the same firmware and I can confirm the same problem. A reboot fixes the problem, which appears without apparent reason.
MysteriousStranger said:
I have also the same firmware and I can confirm the same problem. A reboot fixes the problem, which appears without apparent reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same problem, but my Mi9 is chinese version, 10.2.25.0
mangaba said:
I have the same problem, but my Mi9 is chinese version, 10.2.25.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a post on Xiaomi relevant forum on this? This problem is very common but no one notices I guess
On 10.2.14.0 Global same issue after reboot cpu 0-3 @ 576mhz and cpu 4-6 @710mhz and cpu [email protected]
otherwise idle 0-3 @1036 and [email protected]
This is a long standing issue and xiaomi is known to stray away from fixing such issues. I wouldn't expect them to fix it voluntarily. If we're lucky, android 10+miui 11 will be free of this by virtue of rewritten code because they won't fix it just because 20 people are complaining. The impact to standby consumption is next to 0(at least as I analyzed on mine) so It's more of an OCD thing than anything else.

General Antutu results - very low?

So basically I did 2 tests on my phone.
1. With high performance enabled (decreases battery life)
2. With high performance disabled.
Before each test phone was cooled down to room temp.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
In both cases the results seem...low considering S888 CPU.
And by default the high performance mode is disabled...cause it eats battery like crazy
What are your results?
@user154 your result is from high performance mode?
I see u have much lower temps than I had...do u use the case included or any other case?
In the meantime could u share the screen from CPU temp/clock monitoring on idle? On the main screen you have this little horizontal button with temps and details...just click.details, go to CPU tab and take a screenshot of all 8 cores charts.
My build is: CPH2173_11_A.16
Lol these scores are so pointless like SOT discussions. You won't notice the difference between two phones with different scores no matter how large the difference.....
Hello, i know that bench doesn't show the real UX but there is a gap between the first post and the standard score of find x3 pro.
charcal said:
Hello, i know that bench doesn't show the real UX but there is a gap between the first post and the standard score of find x3 pro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by gap?
A significant difference between your benchmark Antutu and my results. But dont be worried. It's the same phone. take care of the heat.
.

			
				
charcal said:
View attachment 5333529
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impressive temperatures, how did you keep it so low? Attached is my score, not that it may matter in the real world
abdulhamid1978 said:
Impressive temperatures, how did you keep it so low? Attached is my score, not that it may matter in the real world
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello! I live in Lapland.
charcal said:
Hello! I live in Lapland.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense, I need to get a cover laced with ice to mirror your test
Got these scores with AC on cooling the office. Cannot match the Lapland fridge
abdulhamid1978 said:
Got these scores with AC on cooling the office. Cannot match the Lapland fridge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^

Categories

Resources