I used the roocase Exec Tough for my Note 5 for a week before writing this review. The current case I use is an OtterBox Commuter, which has been installed for about 2 months. This brief review will compare/contrast the roocase to the OtterBox.
roocase basics:
- Was sent a production version (not a beta) of the new Exec Tough Slim Fit Armor case for the Note5 to review
- Made from a co-molded TPU/polycarbonate process which combines a shock absorbent rubber inner lining with a hard but flexible outer case into a single cover that snaps onto the phone as one piece
- Case was all black except for the volume and power buttons, which are covered by a raised metal-looking plastic buttons that protect them from dust while making it easy to feel for the buttons with your fingers (more on that below)
- Other colors for the case are available - check the roocase website
- Case was surprisingly thin but strong
- Pictures below
roocase vs. OtterBox comparisons:
- roocase was thinner and lighter; felt easier to hold in my hand than the OtterBox
- roocase was not as bulky in my front pants pocket as the OtterBox
- roocase volume and power button cover keys were easy to locate and press; OtterBox key covers require a much firmer push to engage the buttons by comparison as they are covered by a raised rubber area
- roocase has a nice raised bumper on each case corner, clearly intended to fend off issues from drops (see pic below); OtterBox has no raised corners but has rubber around each corner as part of the OtterBox inner liner piece
- roocase was much easier to install on the phone versus the 2-part install process and alignment / press-fit of the OtterBox; however, roocase was very snug once on the phone once installed, and some strong pressure is needed to remove the roocase - it does not come off easily (probably a good thing)
- roocase does not have any rubber flaps covering the micro-usb or headset jack ports, like the OtterBox does
- Was much easier to get at & remove the S-Pen with the roocase on than with the OtterBox - the OtterBox has a slot in the rubber inner liner at the bottom right of the phone case, which while protecting that corner against drops, makes it a little harder to reach in and pop-out the stylus than the roocase's TPU co-mold design. Those with skinny fingers may not have such issues with the OtterBox installed but I do.
- OtterBox when installed has a higher case lip around the screen that makes you slow down and focus more when using a full finger swipe in from the far left edge of the screen; the roocase does not have as high a lip around the screen, and made this finger gesture easier to be recognized
Other general comparisons:
- Both cases offered clear access to the speaker & mic ports at the bottom and mic port at the top of the phone - no issues
- Both cases offered clear access around the camera and flash on the back of the phone - no issues
- Both cases offered clear access to the micro-usb and headset jacks (other than the OtterBox has rubber flaps covering these which must be first pushed out of the way). I had no issues hooking up my USB cables or Bose & Samsung headset cords to the phone with the cases installed.
Drop test notes:
- I have dropped my phone before with the OtterBox case on it (3' drop), and it landed on the bottom right corner, ejecting the S-pen onto the floor but no damage at all to the phone, case, or S-pen
- I did not drop the phone during the week I had the roocase installed, so I cannot comment on how it protects the phone, but just looking at its design and appearance of case features, it should protect just as well as the OtterBox
In conclusion:
- The roocase was more to my liking than the OtterBox, thanks to the fact that it was seemingly just as strong/durable, but also easier to install on the phone, had less weight/bulk, and it was easier to get at the S-pen/USB/Headset jack locations
- I have not decided which case I will use going forward as my ONLY hesitation with the roocase is that I find the phone screen turns on much too easily in my pocket due to the fact that only the lightest touch is required on the silver roocase button covers to activate the phone. I will use each case for another week, switching between them, until I can decide. Leaning towards the roocase though - just being honest.
These are just my opinions - you have yours. Will reply to thoughtful questions but will ignore any attacks or criticism of my opinion.
jaxf250 said:
I used the roocase Exec Tough for my Note 5 for a week before writing this review. The current case I use is an OtterBox Commuter, which has been installed for about 2 months. This brief review will compare/contrast the roocase to the OtterBox.
roocase basics:
- Was sent a production version (not a beta) of the new Exec Tough Slim Fit Armor case for the Note5 to review
- Made from a co-molded TPU/polycarbonate process which combines a shock absorbent rubber inner lining with a hard but flexible outer case into a single cover that snaps onto the phone as one piece
- Case was all black except for the volume and power buttons, which are covered by a raised metal-looking plastic buttons that protect them from dust while making it easy to feel for the buttons with your fingers (more on that below)
- Other colors for the case are available - check the roocase website
- Case was surprisingly thin but strong
- Pictures below
roocase vs. OtterBox comparisons:
- roocase was thinner and lighter; felt easier to hold in my hand than the OtterBox
- roocase was not as bulky in my front pants pocket as the OtterBox
- roocase volume and power button cover keys were easy to locate and press; OtterBox key covers require a much firmer push to engage the buttons by comparison as they are covered by a raised rubber area
- roocase has a nice raised bumper on each case corner, clearly intended to fend off issues from drops (see pic below); OtterBox has no raised corners but has rubber around each corner as part of the OtterBox inner liner piece
- roocase was much easier to install on the phone versus the 2-part install process and alignment / press-fit of the OtterBox; however, roocase was very snug once on the phone once installed, and some strong pressure is needed to remove the roocase - it does not come off easily (probably a good thing)
- roocase does not have any rubber flaps covering the micro-usb or headset jack ports, like the OtterBox does
- Was much easier to get at & remove the S-Pen with the roocase on than with the OtterBox - the OtterBox has a slot in the rubber inner liner at the bottom right of the phone case, which while protecting that corner against drops, makes it a little harder to reach in and pop-out the stylus than the roocase's TPU co-mold design. Those with skinny fingers may not have such issues with the OtterBox installed but I do.
- OtterBox when installed has a higher case lip around the screen that makes you slow down and focus more when using a full finger swipe in from the far left edge of the screen; the roocase does not have as high a lip around the screen, and made this finger gesture easier to be recognized
Other general comparisons:
- Both cases offered clear access to the speaker & mic ports at the bottom and mic port at the top of the phone - no issues
- Both cases offered clear access around the camera and flash on the back of the phone - no issues
- Both cases offered clear access to the micro-usb and headset jacks (other than the OtterBox has rubber flaps covering these which must be first pushed out of the way). I had no issues hooking up my USB cables or Bose & Samsung headset cords to the phone with the cases installed.
Drop test notes:
- I have dropped my phone before with the OtterBox case on it (3' drop), and it landed on the bottom right corner, ejecting the S-pen onto the floor but no damage at all to the phone, case, or S-pen
- I did not drop the phone during the week I had the roocase installed, so I cannot comment on how it protects the phone, but just looking at its design and appearance of case features, it should protect just as well as the OtterBox
In conclusion:
- The roocase was more to my liking than the OtterBox, thanks to the fact that it was seemingly just as strong/durable, but also easier to install on the phone, had less weight/bulk, and it was easier to get at the S-pen/USB/Headset jack locations
- I have not decided which case I will use going forward as my ONLY hesitation with the roocase is that I find the phone screen turns on much too easily in my pocket due to the fact that only the lightest touch is required on the silver roocase button covers to activate the phone. I will use each case for another week, switching between them, until I can decide. Leaning towards the roocase though - just being honest.
These are just my opinions - you have yours. Will reply to thoughtful questions but will ignore any attacks or criticism of my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great review, thanks.
May I add, the otterbox cover for ports is a great advantage especially as a daily commuter, my pockets are filled with stuff.
This stuff caused me to loose my headphone jack because it was not connected on my work Iphone.
*the fact that it was an iphone didn't help *
Hello Everyone! So Orzly, a case company, recently sent out two of their OnePlus 3 Cases to me for review. I have been using these cases from the past couple of days and I have finally compiled my video review for the same. The Two cases that were sent to me are-
1. Orzly Fusion Bumper Case
- This is a transparent hard plastic case that has a rubber lining along the sides for impact protection
- Works well. Since it is transparent, you can show off your phone with it.
- Doesn't add much bulk. Feels sturdy to use
- The Plastic material is a fingerprint magnet and after prolonged usage, the transparent plastic tends to turn a little yellowish at some places
- Notification slider is a bit difficult to use.
- Case even covers the front of the phone, so if you keep your phone face down, your screen will not be damaged
-Good impact protection. Did drop it quite a few times with this case, the phone was very well protected.
Grip Pro Case
- As the name suggests, Provides loads of grip and protection to the phone.
- It is a 2 part case. The outer shell has a grippy texture.
- Bulky as compared to some other cases but offers very good protection.
- Notification slider is easier to use on this case compared to the fusion case
- Best for active users who have a rough usage.
Overall, these two cases are great for the OnePlus 3. I have made an indepth video review of them and it would be great if you can check the video out. Please ask your questions, queries in this thread. Thanks
Here is the video:-
Hi all, I would like to take this opportunity and give my honest and practical review about this case & screen protectors.. Pictures coming up soon.
I have had this case for about one week now and its been great in terms of protections. I generally don't have butter fingers. Most of the times, i have my phone on my office table. As far as the protection goes, this case does an excellent job protecting volume rockers, power button, alert slider and charging port. It's shock absorbing patterns is great for those corner drops. This has to be one of the best bumper case I have used on smart phones. Previously, i have been using the Spigen Rugged Armour as my daily driver. Its a very beautiful soft tpu case but doesn't match the protection anywhere close to what RhinoShield offers. This case is for someone who wants great protection in very minimalist way. It's definitely worth giving it a try.
I am also using the Rhino Tempered Screen Guard. I have used few other brands before this, I got to say this is one of the best out there because of the following reasons. Scratch reistant, slim profile, anti-fingerprint, not edge to edge screen protector which makes it easy for me to switch cases without worrying.
Pros
-great protection
-it covers the camera bump
-doesn't rock when its laid on table
-alert slider works fine
-excellent cutout for the usb Type C charger and speakers
Cons
- It's very snug that makes it difficult to remove/putting on the case for the first few times
- very stiff volume rockers
- side bumper could use additional textures styling to improve the grip since this phone is >5 inch.
-will not be able to use the full size tempered glass screen protectors
Here is a video from Phonebuff who did a drop test while using this case. It's a killer case. It sets bar higher for other phone case makers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhmoxjptZcM
Just a quick thread to show the MaxKu Oneplus 5T Case, Full Range Protection High Quality Carbon Fiber Case Thin Shock Absorption TPU Case Cover for Oneplus 5T (Black)...
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B077GV9NCD/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
...with the Ultimate Shield® OnePlus 5T FRONT SHIELD Invisible Screen Protector:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Ultimate-Shield-OnePlus-5T-FRONT-SHIELD-Invisible-Screen-Protector/112663445409?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649
After trying a few different tempered glass options I finally settled, the best I could with this set up.
As much as I loved the idea behind the glass screen protectors, I disliked the ones I tried for the following reasons:
- The surface being too reflective and turning my phone into a mirror in most environments, other than higher brightness indoors
- Losing the beauty of the AMOLED screen (blacks appearing grey'ish)
- The rainbow effect
- Slight loss of sensitivity
My application of the Ultimate Shield went relatively smoothly. The installation is a wet one (giggidy) and I also performed it in a steamy bathroom to again further reduce floating dust getting under the screen. Dare I say it, the screen is pretty much perfect minus a few lift ups at the edging. This was when I put my beloved Spigen Rugged Armour case on, however the MaxKu case - whilst not feeling as sturdy in the hand - does the job good enough and only slightly lifted it up at points. Very much only a bit and that I can live with.
See second post for pictures...
Here are the pictures....
Here is my review of the official Karbon Bumper Case.
It's costs around 2000 in India and offers full edge protection.
If you compare it to the bundled transparent case, the chins n raises around corners n camera bump are not so subtle.
But overall the case is slicker and suited my taste.
Here are quick pros n cons
1. Sturdy build quality
2. Slick n doesn't change the overall size of the already large phone
3. Hard back n tpu sides combo
4. Karbon print looks good
5. Doesn't push the screen protector
6. Buttons are accessible n clicky
Cons
1. The camera bump is just edge to edge, doesn't offer much protection
2. Karbon print gets scratched easily on sharp objects
3. Bit slippery
4. Hides the phone colour, i cant really flaunt the shimmery frosted silver colour.
5. Quite pricey compared to other branded options out there.
So i ended up doing a small DIY to raise the chin on camera bump. Check the attached pics.
Overall satisfied