Honest opinion: V40 vs V35 - LG V40 Guides, News, & Discussion

Let me start by saying I use a Note 9 as my personal phone and LG V35 ThinQ as my work phone. I've been really impressed with the features of the V35 and the smoothness of the interface. Naturally I was curious to see how it compares to the V40 so I did some hands on comparison.
The good changes are 5 cameras instead of 3, Android 8.1 instead of 8.0, power button on the right side rather than back.
As for what's the same with the V35 and V40, Snapdragon 845, 6 GB RAM, 3300 mAh battery, cool Aurora Black color with blue reflection and overall software skin. The screen is excellent on both (fixed after V30)
What I don't care for is the taller, more narrow aspect ratio of the V40. Sure it may be 6.4 inches instead of 6.0 inches, but if you factor in the notch and the narrower screen with noticeably larger side bezels, it doesn't look bigger. The off center speaker was an odd design choice given that the two front cameras could have gone on opposite sides.
The V40 felt premium in hand, just as the V35 does, but I didn't find there to be any upgrades that made the V40 enticing. It feels like LG missed the opportunity for a bigger battery, stereo speakers, software upgrades, or something else to distinguish it. Most camera enthusiasts will probably get the Pixel 3 XL or Note 9 over this.
Bottom line is if you're buying a phone outright, I'd say the V35 ThinQ is a much better value. You're getting almost everything in a smaller form factor, with no notch. If you're looking for carrier financing, the V40 is a great phone, but I'd have trouble recommending it as it faces tough competition from the OnePlus 6T, Note 9 and even S9+. It's already $200 off and likely will get cheaper during the holidays. Save your money and get the V35 ThinQ, OnePlus 6T, S9+, or go all in for the Note 9.

I agree that I think the V35 is a better value. I think the only issue for me, personally, is that the V40 is much more likely to get bootloader unlock and/or some form of root. The V35 has no development community after months of being out, which is honestly a shame because it's my favorite phone this year. Hopefully the guys working on the Qualcomm RSA Signature exploit make some progress to kickstart development across the board (and specifically the V35). Either way, I like what LG's been doing with their phones (with the exception of slow to no bootloader unlock in the states).

If value is equal to cost then yes buying an earlier model of phone will almost always be a better value than the latest and greatest. I must be missing something here...
Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk

At least you have the option for the V35, I don't with verizon. That notch turns me off about the V40 and I've been looking at the razor phone 2 128GB(when ever that model shows up). The v10 and v20 have 64GB of storage, so why doesn't the v40 come standard with 128GB? It's bad enough there's no removable battery in the v40.

The Unlocked V35 ThinQ from Amazon or B&H do work on Verizon.
Given that the V35 ThinQ has the same processor, same RAM, same battery, same storage and is less than 6 mos old, it's a fair comparison. The ONLY reasons to get a V40 over a V35 are the cameras and carrier financing, just a tip to those on a budget.

Or get a v30+ 128GB with bootloader unlocked and root

I've had both phones, and it's weird because my feeling is that the V35 is actually faster and more responsive in use than the V40.

Though I don't own either V35 or V40 ( I do have a V20 though).... in addition to what was mentioned, the 5 cameras, "larger" notched screen... I'd mention the "boombox" speakers. I haven't witnessed it first hand but I hear from the community that the boombox speakers are indeed a major upgrade. I personally like using my speakerphone to play music in a small room, though I don't know if it's necessarily worth the price premium on those features a lone... I also got the impression that the V40 had better battery life (impressions are from multiple youtube videos posted).

ssnova said:
Though I don't own either V35 or V40 ( I do have a V20 though).... in addition to what was mentioned, the 5 cameras, "larger" notched screen... I'd mention the "boombox" speakers. I haven't witnessed it first hand but I hear from the community that the boombox speakers are indeed a major upgrade. I personally like using my speakerphone to play music in a small room, though I don't know if it's necessarily worth the price premium on those features a lone... I also got the impression that the V40 had better battery life (impressions are from multiple youtube videos posted).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second that

Guyinlaca said:
Let me start by saying I use a Note 9 as my personal phone and LG V35 ThinQ as my work phone. I've been really impressed with the features of the V35 and the smoothness of the interface. Naturally I was curious to see how it compares to the V40 so I did some hands on comparison.
The good changes are 5 cameras instead of 3, Android 8.1 instead of 8.0, power button on the right side rather than back.
As for what's the same with the V35 and V40, Snapdragon 845, 6 GB RAM, 3300 mAh battery, cool Aurora Black color with blue reflection and overall software skin. The screen is excellent on both (fixed after V30)
What I don't care for is the taller, more narrow aspect ratio of the V40. Sure it may be 6.4 inches instead of 6.0 inches, but if you factor in the notch and the narrower screen with noticeably larger side bezels, it doesn't look bigger. The off center speaker was an odd design choice given that the two front cameras could have gone on opposite sides.
The V40 felt premium in hand, just as the V35 does, but I didn't find there to be any upgrades that made the V40 enticing. It feels like LG missed the opportunity for a bigger battery, stereo speakers, software upgrades, or something else to distinguish it. Most camera enthusiasts will probably get the Pixel 3 XL or Note 9 over this.
Bottom line is if you're buying a phone outright, I'd say the V35 ThinQ is a much better value. You're getting almost everything in a smaller form factor, with no notch. If you're looking for carrier financing, the V40 is a great phone, but I'd have trouble recommending it as it faces tough competition from the OnePlus 6T, Note 9 and even S9+. It's already $200 off and likely will get cheaper during the holidays. Save your money and get the V35 ThinQ, OnePlus 6T, S9+, or go all in for the Note 9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not only is v35 a good value, they're really the same phone with v40 having non significant upgrades.

Having spent a year with V30 and moving to V40 at its launch, I would certainly confirm that it's a minor upgrade. However, if you're big on speaker audio, definitely go for V40. The speaker output due to resonance chamber effect is way better! I don't have to cup my hand around the speaker and hold it to my ear to hear it anymore in noisy areas.
Other areas of improvement for me-- display quality/clarity/brightness and cameras. The V40 feels better to me, and I admit that while I'm not a fan of notches, this is at least a nice approach that isn't wasteful, and being able to "configure" how it appears is a nice touch. The cameras (with latest firmware updates) are much improved over launch samples I saw and took... very pleased with how they've turned out.
I'm mixed on the Power button returning to the side button. I had a love hate with it being combined with thumbprint on V30/V35... it made screenshots harder to take, and it made turning the device off challenging. That said, having it separate on the side has proven challenging to unlearn, lol.
I have asked them about making the Assistant button configurable to default assistant rather than Google. So far they haven't, but I still hope they will. I guess my final verdict is... it's the perfect hardware for ME, but there's still some software tweaks that I want.

I have had the V30 since lauch and its still great. I have not (yet) rooted it but happy about the option to do so when/if I choose to. One thing I noticed on the specs for the V40 is the USB is 2.0 vs 3.1 like on the V30? Did this actually go backwards? I never really seen a technology spec revert way back. It would seem like something as simple/common as USB would at least be the same as the V30??

banshee28 said:
I have had the V30 since lauch and its still great. I have not (yet) rooted it but happy about the option to do so when/if I choose to. One thing I noticed on the specs for the V40 is the USB is 2.0 vs 3.1 like on the V30? Did this actually go backwards? I never really seen a technology spec revert way back. It would seem like something as simple/common as USB would at least be the same as the V30??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is USB Type - C 2.0 (3.1 compatible) from everything I have read and it transfer super fast via USB to and from my laptop. Transferred a 50 minute video from my laptop to my phone in less than a minute along with 2 other videos.
So my assumption is USB Type - C 2.0 is second generation and it is 3.1 for USB connectivity.

truckerdewd said:
It is USB Type - C 2.0 (3.1 compatible) from everything I have read and it transfer super fast via USB to and from my laptop. Transferred a 50 minute video from my laptop to my phone in less than a minute along with 2 other videos.
So my assumption is USB Type - C 2.0 is second generation and it is 3.1 for USB connectivity l.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, thanks that explains it! Now I see the difference. Not sure if the phone itself is worth the upgrade still, but its very nice that the USB does seem like an upgrade.

Guyinlaca said:
Let me start by saying I use a Note 9 as my personal phone and LG V35 ThinQ as my work phone. I've been really impressed with the features of the V35 and the smoothness of the interface. Naturally I was curious to see how it compares to the V40 so I did some hands on comparison.
The good changes are 5 cameras instead of 3, Android 8.1 instead of 8.0, power button on the right side rather than back.
As for what's the same with the V35 and V40, Snapdragon 845, 6 GB RAM, 3300 mAh battery, cool Aurora Black color with blue reflection and overall software skin. The screen is excellent on both (fixed after V30)
What I don't care for is the taller, more narrow aspect ratio of the V40. Sure it may be 6.4 inches instead of 6.0 inches, but if you factor in the notch and the narrower screen with noticeably larger side bezels, it doesn't look bigger. The off center speaker was an odd design choice given that the two front cameras could have gone on opposite sides.
The V40 felt premium in hand, just as the V35 does, but I didn't find there to be any upgrades that made the V40 enticing. It feels like LG missed the opportunity for a bigger battery, stereo speakers, software upgrades, or something else to distinguish it. Most camera enthusiasts will probably get the Pixel 3 XL or Note 9 over this.
Bottom line is if you're buying a phone outright, I'd say the V35 ThinQ is a much better value. You're getting almost everything in a smaller form factor, with no notch. If you're looking for carrier financing, the V40 is a great phone, but I'd have trouble recommending it as it faces tough competition from the OnePlus 6T, Note 9 and even S9+. It's already $200 off and likely will get cheaper during the holidays. Save your money and get the V35 ThinQ, OnePlus 6T, S9+, or go all in for the Note 9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
V35 and V40 and very similar but I choose the V40 for whatever reason. I do like the V40 tho so not disappointed. Actually liking it more than my Note 9.
The notch isn't bad like the pixel XL 3 or iPhones. And in reallity makes it the same size as the V35 when playing videos and such. Unlike XS the notch doesn't get in the way of videos and games

Anyone know how to update a V35 its been unlocked not on AT&T so I never have got ANY update?

Related

Not sure if I should get Xiaomi or Nokia

I am considering either getting A2 or Nokia 7 Plus.
The A2 has the same hardware platform but is considerably cheaper but there are a few things/questions that I am considering:
1. the updates on A1, if I read comments or on the A1 forum seem to be late and buggy. This is one of the major drawbacks for me as I want a stable device and I am afraid the same thing will happen with A2
2. on Nokia there seem a way to enable gcam without doing root on the device, on A2 I saw that root is needed... this would be a drawback as gcam seems to improve picture taking on many devices
3. How does the device feel in hand? Is it slippery? Is the camera bump annoying?
4. Any software/hardware issues reported so far? I read something about proximity sensor but other than that not much.
The reviews for the device aren't stellar. Most complain about nfc, jack and sd card. None of this are important to me, I care about updates and camera.
So, should I get the Nokia (better build, bigger battery, stable and fast updates, probably a bit better camera, gcam working, better screen, no PWM for brightness)
I'd like to hear your advices. Thank you for your time.
It'll be better if you buy the Nokia 7 plus Android One version! You'll get most the things needed in a flagship phone (not all) and it's better than Mi A2 in most of the time except the camera!
You should also bear in mind that Nokia phones have no official way of unlocking bootloader for now, so there won't be lot of custom development for their devices until HMD decide to provide way to unlock bootloader. And according to HMDs head twitter, they won't do it because of security (proof: https://twitter.com/sarvikas/status/910421837661790208)
There certainly are a ** lot ** of things to consider when buying a phone now-a-days.
One of the very first things I look at is appearance, and weight. So right off the bat, 2 knocks on the 7plus; it's gaudy looking with the faux gold trim, and it's 183 grams (and I thought 165 gram phones were heavy!).
I'm shocked you would say an issue with the Mi A2 would be build quality? I don't have mine yet, but the unibody construction of these devices, like the Huawei Mate SE, are as good as it gets. Could not feel more solid. There's a marked difference to how a device with a unibody and 2.5D raised glass feels compared to how a device (like the 7plus) that has a 'flat' band all around it, holding the top and the bottom panels together.
I much much prefer the rounded unibody, way more comfortable in the hand, less likely to slip. And the metal body of them isn't slippery.
Yes, the A1 has had some issues with updates / bugs. But the A2 already has the ota security patch / bug fixes for August available. Someone mentioned they seem to be doing better with the A2 and it may well be because it's Project Treble.
As someone else mentioned; Is the bootloader unlockable? That's right near the top of the list for me, if not the top. If the Nok is locked down (as said), it's off my list. At some point, and you might keep the phone that long, updates will stop. If you can't unlock it, then the phone is basically done.
As far as reviews go, actually the ones i've read, are stellar. Yes, the lack of nfc, expansion, no jack, are mentioned. They all mention it. I guess they have to or it won't be considered a decent review. But to me, I can live without them, not that much of a big. What is a big, and it's mentioned a lot in the reviews I've read, are the cameras. The f1.75 cams on the back will let in a ** lot ** of light. All reviews indicate they do well in low light (as you would expect), some even say the great cameras make up for the loss of the other items.
So what's important to you? I"m going with Android One is big, good cameras is really big, unlockable bootloader is huge, not too heavy helps to keep me from constantly pulling my pants up, available in black... I like black (not gaudy pls).
We all have our criteria don't we...
Build quality of the A2 is amazing. Feels like a flagship device. I was afraid how it would compare to my light Nexus 5x but man was I wrong. I loved it from the start
Custom roms were my main deciding factor compared to Nokia or bq even if there is no NFC or RGB notification LED. So I am ready to use the hardware until it breaks.
Headphone jack I don't care too much, get a fiio btr Bluetooth headphone amp and you are smartphone independent and can use your cable headphones which I won't change to anything purely bluetooth based unless Sennheiser comes out with some usb-c based ie80s.
SD card? You really need more than 64GB or 128Gb even? I am happy with the 64GB but depends a lot on what you are planning to do.
Oh I forgot the amazing camera. You can find some of my pics in the gcam thread. Guess I will upload a little camera showcase soon.
Thank you all for your thoughts.
@AsItLies I did not say there's an issue with build quality on A2. As you say, I am kind of convinced that it will fell better in hand as it is rounded, and that matters on big phones a lot. What I have noticed is that the camera bump is really big and that could make it wobble on the table.
So to set the list of pros and cons
A2
+ good feel in hand
- no way to use gcam without root and bootloader unlock which is something I don't want to do.
- no double tap to wake
+/- the software remains to be seen... A1 wasn't really great in that department
7Plus
+ double tape to wake
+ better screen quality
+ stable software with quick updates
+ google camera works without root
- like 25% more expensive
- not sure the looks in live preview with the copper accent.
- finger print scanner seems a bit too high, but A2 kind of looks at the same spot
- no notification led and glance uses battery since it has LCD
- bulkier and heavier
To be honest, I don't care for rooting the device. In 2 years, after no more updates, I am sure there will be other cheap alternatives to get.
Looks like you're not power user, doesn't need rooted device or custom ROM, etc. Based on this I recommend the 7 Plus, I think it's better than A2 for general usage. A2 to me strong in the community support and development since it has better value for budget phone.
7 Plus wins in many aspects, but A2 is slightly better at camera department based on some reviews I read. 7 Plus prices is very high compared to other mid range devices, I think if you have the money and can add few bucks more, you can buy flagship phone with Snapdragon 8XX instead of 7 Plus.
I care about:
1. updates - I have my concerns on updates given the previous history with A1.
2. camera - some say nokia is better, some say a2 is better. Probably nokia with gcam is better
3.handling- a2 seems to be more rounded, slimmer but has that huge camera bump what probably makes it wobble on table. Together with no double touch to wake makes it no so ergonomic.
Nokia kind of ticks most of the boxes really, however, a2 is 25% cheaper and may have life after 2 years with the community. At the price of 7plus, I could get a used pixel 2 for instance and that has better camera and updates.
Tough choice to make.
alinescoo said:
I care about:
1. updates - I have my concerns on updates given the previous history with A1.
2. camera - some say nokia is better, some say a2 is better. Probably nokia with gcam is better
3.handling- a2 seems to be more rounded, slimmer but has that huge camera bump what probably makes it wobble on table. Together with no double touch to wake makes it no so ergonomic.
Nokia kind of ticks most of the boxes really, however, a2 is 25% cheaper and may have life after 2 years with the community. At the price of 7plus, I could get a used pixel 2 for instance and that has better camera and updates.
Tough choice to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well hopefully you won't mind my version of your concerns, but always remember, these things are evolving and changing, due to experience. It's only natural with complicated things like this.
1. updates - While the A1 did run into a few issues, I'd say remember, this is a new thing for them. They'll probably get it right soon, evidenced by the August patch available now... and it's August! That's almost unheard of in itself.
2. Camera - I certainly like the Zeiss optics on the Nok, but Sony is no slouch either. Keep in mind the aperture of the 2 rear cameras on the A2 are f1.75. The Nok are f1.8 and f2.6 (for the optical zoom one). I don't know exactly, but the diff between the 1.75 and 2.6 is a Full Stop, if not more. That means, if u don't know, that the 1.75 will let in TWICE the amount of light. That's a huge difference, resulting in much better pictures.
The other thing re the GCam. I have a port on my LG G6 now. It's very good. Except it doesn't have all the features the OEM app has. For instance; taking a selfie in portrait mode, there is no timer. Also note the GCam ports won't use both lenses, as the pixel phones only have one lens. Some OEM apps use info from both lenses to create bokeh effects etc.
3. Handling - it is an individual thing for sure. My take on the camera bump is - I'd prefer it didn't have it, but I just don't set the phone down on the back (unless it's in a case). If I set it down I'll set it on the front. It's usually just in my pocket.
All cameras (except the G6!) have a bump, the A2 is just a bit bigger. Oh well. As far as double tap, for me... I've never used it, even once. Just use the finger print scanner.
Again! not knocking your concerns, they are valid for you, that's all that matters. Just giving a different perspective on them. Tomorrow, I may think differently! Haha, phones, they've become so complicated it's more and more time consuming to evaluate them. I've bought and sold so many lately, I never thought I would do that! I think I have a new addiction
About the handling, if you don't use a case with Mi A2, it is a bit slippery for me. The device is actually round but it is also thin. The metal at the back is very smooth and could be slippery for some.
And I think the cameras between two are not so different, depends on your taste. But the sensor with Nokia 7 Plus is larger so it should produce better images in low light.
@AsItLies thank you for your detailed info. I am very glad to receive info from an owner.
@Marciano09 thank you. To be honest, my comfort zone ends around the sizes of pixel 2, but the trend now is to have phones bigger and bigger so I guess I need to get used to it. So, bigger and slippery is not something that sounds comfortable. Nokia seems to have some ceramic back cover which probably improves handling but has rougher edges.
I saw some comparison videos on camera samples, sometimes I liked A2 ones, sometimes the Nokia ones. Nokia with gcam has some really nice photos where on xiaomi I depend on the OEM camera.
Really tough choice to make.
alinescoo said:
I care about:
1. updates - I have my concerns on updates given the previous history with A1.
2. camera - some say nokia is better, some say a2 is better. Probably nokia with gcam is better
3.handling- a2 seems to be more rounded, slimmer but has that huge camera bump what probably makes it wobble on table. Together with no double touch to wake makes it no so ergonomic.
Nokia kind of ticks most of the boxes really, however, a2 is 25% cheaper and may have life after 2 years with the community. At the price of 7plus, I could get a used pixel 2 for instance and that has better camera and updates.
Tough choice to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. they're both android one devices, sure, the nokia may not have as much dev support but it will get the same 2y official treatment because of android one.
2. both good cameras yep, the a2 will probably take some better nighttime pics, the nokia might be better at portrait mode.
3. forget about the double tap to wake... it's so much nicer to use the fingerprint to wake up instead! and yes, the a2 isn't stable on a flat table. even with the tpu case it still wobbles. the case helps, but it's still not standing nicely.
if you care about the price difference, go for the a2. but be aware that the a2 will drop in price over the next few months. this is the most expensive it will ever be. the nokia may have started to drop in price already.
the features that may point you to the nokia:
- nfc
- bigger battery
- 3.5 jack
- sd card support
- sturdier
a2:
- slimmer, lighter
- maybe better dev support (on the long long run however it's probably irrelevant since both phones are android one supported) - see LE
- maybe better night shots (it's still a phone however, and anything but the highest end flagships pale in comparison to real cameras - if you ask me never pick a phone based on cameras)
- cheaper (however expect the price to drop over the next months! this is the launch price)
did you consider/looked at the redmi note 5 pro (whyred)?
- already has some good custom roms (lineage)
- better battery
- 636 is a 660 running at a lower clock speed (even better use of battery)
- way cheaper
L.E.
- yes, the proximity sensor on the a2 seems a bit wonky, but not as bad as some reviews describe it
- updates are always a bit weird at first, android one is the fix for that (on both phones), only difference is the nokia had the time it needed to fix some already
- without a case yes, the a2 is slippery. use the included case from the moment you unbox it.
- yes, i own an A2, i love it and dont regret getting one, i recommend it to anyone looking to buy one.
- dev support...
*yes, it's very possible the a2 will get better unofficial support. however, and i don't know how i'm gonna say this without getting the full wrath of the forum thrown at me... that's irrelevant.
*you get a android one so you don't have to worry about the official support! you get one of these to be able to stay on the stock rom.
*either way you look at it, and in all honesty i really appreciate the work all the devs pull of unofficially for devices, thank you all and keep up the good work!
*however you cannot expect a handful of devs to be able to compete with google or big oem's. - again, this may seem like i am ungrateful, that's not the case. (only exception is when those oem-s choose to drop support). with android one they cannot do that even if they wanted to.
*both phones will get security patches and android updates for a minimum of 2 years. by then, regardless which one you buy you'll want a newer one that supports 6g or vr over lte or 5 cameras or a bendable screen. or whatever else gimmick they pull out of the hat by then. (if anything, i would be sorry for having to dump the nokia more)
I personally was debating between this or the 6.1 plus. I don't recall off hand what the deciding factor for me was. But I went with the a2 and it will be here Tuesday.
Nickdroid86 said:
I personally was debating between this or the 6.1 plus. I don't recall off hand what the deciding factor for me was. But I went with the a2 and it will be here Tuesday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now that's a better comparison!
picked the a2 for the large screen and better cameras?
enjoy the new a2! and piece of advice... dont switch away from the standard android one for as long as you can. unlike the other xiaomi-s with miui, it's actually not a bad idea to stick to stock.
if you find the time share your opinions about it after a few days
Doing a little research and found on gsmarena u can not only compare phones, but also photo comparisons;
There are 3 categories it compares them in: Lowest ISO, Good Light, Low Light. There's some explanation of how they got their results, but they seem a bit vague (but at least they have SOME control they're doing).
An issue that comes up when comparing Cameras is some think it has to be an apples to apples comparison; Same ISO, Same Aperture, Same exposure time. They think that's the only way to have a true comparison.
But here's the thing; A comparison really should be 'take the best picture possible' for ea camera under the exact conditions and exact subject matter. That way, if one camera has pixel binning, it can use that. Or another camera has a wider aperture it can use that, etc.
But this does give 'some' idea of how the 2 phone cameras compare, it's pretty cool to fool around with, click in the design on the left to change what's focused on. Also note, the pictures do seem to indicate when a lense has a wider angle than another, noted by what's captured in the 'viewing box'.
https://www.gsmarena.com/piccmp.php3?idType=5&idPhone1=9140&idPhone2=9058
I think the build quality of A2 is very good but the metal back is really slippery. I have to use the TPU cover provided. After using the cover, the camera bump is not a big issue. The bump becomes much smaller.
I also considered Nokia 7 Plus but I think it's too bulky and heavy for me. As I don't need NFC and SD card because it's not my main phone, I can live with it.
The screen is vibrant and crisp. I really didn't expect that in such a low price phone.
Thank you all for your valuable informations. The price of Nokia 7 plus is around the same as a Pixel 2 (the smaller one) and I think I'll keep an eye on the market for a good deal. Pixel is more compact, has great camera and another 2 years of software updates.
Thank all again you for your time.
laviniu_c said:
now that's a better comparison!
picked the a2 for the large screen and better cameras?
enjoy the new a2! and piece of advice... dont switch away from the standard android one for as long as you can. unlike the other xiaomi-s with miui, it's actually not a bad idea to stick to stock.
if you find the time share your opinions about it after a few days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will for sure. I love Android One software. I had it with my regular Nokia 6.1
Comparing 7 plus and a2 is like comparing apples to oranges (both are phones). In terms of price there is a stellar difference, if you can afford the 7 plus, better go for a pixel 1 (you said you wanted updates and camera), i personally bought a2 because it's cheap as hell and even if i'd be the richest person on the planet i would not pay more than 300 dollars for a phone.
Android is made for SD8XX, nomatter what these cheapsters hide under the lid (SD6XX) they will always hang, lag, overheat and die fast.
Component wise the a2 feels like a joke (sorry, copying the iphone x in this manner it's way beyond shame) and a toy for kids with the ir blaster (come on it's 2018) and the lack of nfc (if you're european you'll understand).
If you have the money buy the pixel 1, if you're a cheapster like the a2, go for it. I don't se the reason to buy the 7 plus.
strapabiro said:
Comparing 7 plus and a2 is like comparing apples to oranges (both are phones). In terms of price there is a stellar difference, if you can afford the 7 plus, better go for a pixel 1 (you said you wanted updates and camera), i personally bought a2 because it's cheap as hell and even if i'd be the richest person on the planet i would not pay more than 300 dollars for a phone.
Android is made for SD8XX, nomatter what these cheapsters hide under the lid (SD6XX) they will always hang, lag, overheat and die fast.
Component wise the a2 feels like a joke (sorry, copying the iphone x in this manner it's way beyond shame) and a toy for kids with the ir blaster (come on it's 2018) and the lack of nfc (if you're european you'll understand).
If you have the money buy the pixel 1, if you're a cheapster like the a2, go for it. I don't se the reason to buy the 7 plus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android is made for SD8XX? Each phone is optimized for it's precessor, among other hardware. Some better than others. The sd660 in my mi a2 is hanging in there up against my sd845 in my s9+ and the sd835 in my pixel 2 xl..

Why LG is so stupid

that it can't implement the "night mode" similar to that of Huawei P20 Pro? So the camera could produce clear night shot while being holding stable for 3 seconds and stitch several photos together using neuro network algorithm
Billy Madison said:
that it can't implement the "night mode" similar to that of Huawei P20 Pro? So the camera could produce clear night shot while being holding stable for 3 seconds and stitch several photos together using neuro network algorithm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I analyzed the video, there are 3 different circles below representing the 3 cameras on the back . The scene is at night, so LG wants to show us that their new device can take very good pictures at night even with the potrait mode. it comes with build in portrait . The amazing thing is that the switch between the 3 cameras runs smoothly a.f
Also i think one camera stands for Ultra Zoom + Portrait mode, the second one for our well known Wide Cam and the third for the normale cam
Well I think LG is stupid for a few reasons:
- They've started to follow other phones starting with the v30 (stupid glass bodies, water resistant non-removable batteries, their own AI software, stupid notches)
- stopped supporting removable batteries, the main reason I switched to LG from Samsung in the first place
They were trend setters (dual lens cameras, DAC, minimal bezels, module design) and now they're just another company in the sea of smart phones that copies whatever trends Apple and Samsung start.
Their prices aren't competitive, there really is nothing to me (outside of the dac) that really differentiates it from the competition.
My next phone will likely be the Note (because I loved the stylus on the note 3) or the premium budget brands (OnePlus, Huawei)
The only way I'd stick with LG is if they offered a large battery capacity versus the competition or made it a real Note competitor by making it the premium version of the Stylo.
Sent from my LG-H918 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
evo4g63t said:
Well I think LG is stupid for a few reasons:
- They've started to follow other phones starting with the v30 (stupid glass bodies, water resistant non-removable batteries, their own AI software, stupid notches)
- stopped supporting removable batteries, the main reason I switched to LG from Samsung in the first place
They were trend setters (dual lens cameras, DAC, minimal bezels, module design) and now they're just another company in the sea of smart phones that copies whatever trends Apple and Samsung start.
Their prices aren't competitive, there really is nothing to me (outside of the dac) that really differentiates it from the competition.
My next phone will likely be the Note (because I loved the stylus on the note 3) or the premium budget brands (OnePlus, Huawei)
The only way I'd stick with LG is if they offered a large battery capacity versus the competition or made it a real Note competitor by making it the premium version of the Stylo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Problem I have with lg and others who were different too. LG used to be one of the last of a dying breed,and that was a great thing. Now the market is flooded with ugly notch phones,but wait,there's a way to hide it...stupidity
In past LG phone looked different from other phones, now story is different... Every phone on market is the same (almost)...
evo4g63t said:
Well I think LG is stupid for a few reasons:
- They've started to follow other phones starting with the v30 (stupid glass bodies, water resistant non-removable batteries, their own AI software, stupid notches)
- stopped supporting removable batteries, the main reason I switched to LG from Samsung in the first place
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well most of us think the V30 was the best android in years especially since they are rooted now. Also V30 was LGs original design. 6 inch form factor at 5.5 oz with all the high end bells and whistles except for front cam.
That's how I feel. I loved the V30 top to bottom. I'll stand by any company that has the balls to keep a headphone jack. Not many others can.
IshsXda said:
Well most of us think the V30 was the best android in years especially since they are rooted now. Also V30 was LGs original design. 6 inch form factor at 5.5 oz with all the high end bells and whistles except for front cam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
To be fair, I think LG is the most unerrated phone manufacturer. Yes, phones up to the G5/V20 were always lacking in quality compared to rivals. The V30 had great design but a very uneven screen, however they've greatly improved with the V35, G7, and now the V40. I'd still say the Note 9 is this year's best phone, but in a few months, one will likely be able to pickup a V40 for hundreds less than comparable Samsung or Pixel models. One can already get a new V35 ThinQ for about $600. If they'd release them at a lower price or bump up battery life, I think they'd sell quite well.
As for the notch, the biggest issue is that Google has not optimized the software for them yet. The bright white theme makes notches look terrible, but a universal dark theme would greatly help. Some apps crop the screen, others have tiered headers going right through it. LG is on the right path with allowing one to hide the notch, while keeping the status bar there but Google needs to catch up.
evo4g63t said:
Well I think LG is stupid for a few reasons:
- They've started to follow other phones starting with the v30 (stupid glass bodies, water resistant non-removable batteries, their own AI software, stupid notches)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would disagree. The whole reason LG thought that their phones didn't sell well was because they were too different, like back placed volume buttons and back power button it the finger sensor. So, they decided that people shy their non-standard approach and made recent phones to be like others in hopes to boost sales
evo4g63t said:
They were trend setters (dual lens cameras, DAC, minimal bezels, module design) and now they're just another company in the sea of smart phones that copies whatever trends Apple and Samsung start.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They said in the beginning of 2018 that they will not make rush phones no more. Instead, they will wait until every other company would make their bad designed phones and only AFTER that will release LG own better than equivalent's designed phone.
I.E. LG could already release flip phone. But instead, like they said, they wait until Samsung will unveil Galaxy X flip phone, see what Samsung will make poor and release than better than rival's phone.
evo4g63t said:
Their prices aren't competitive, there really is nothing to me (outside of the dac) that really differentiates it from the competition.
My next phone will likely be the Note (because I loved the stylus on the note 3) or the premium budget brands (OnePlus, Huawei)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really, why do you think that Huawei prices are competitive and LG's aren't ? What in Mate 20 Pro could justify spending $1100 for their garbage? Chinese AI? Trojans and home ringing viruses?
I can't really see what for to spend $600 on OnePlus 6T.
evo4g63t said:
The only way I'd stick with LG is if they offered a large battery capacity versus the competition or made it a real Note competitor by making it the premium version of the Stylo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's pointless. Larger battery means longer charging time and more hefty weight. It's bad for sales because vast majority of buyers aren't us, geek but mostly ladies and they can't use hefty phones. They need phone to be 150g in weight. That's Galaxy S range, not 200G of P20 Pro. That's why P20 Pro sells too bad. No one really needs large battery because it can be recharged fast, wirelessly and even wirelessly fast. So, battery argument is pointless.
Instead, LG phones are better designed, built, have vastly better screens than Samsung, OnePlus, Oppo or Huawei. Only Sony & HTC have probably better displays than LG's but it's debatable.
G2 G3 was a great success with its unique traits. Even surpassing Samsung in its own homeland
I liked some of the points made and some of the answers.
I think LG is stupid (after buying the V40) is they don't allow you to change the new buttons and sensors to the way you used to use them on your previous model. After all, they kept all the same buttons/sensors, only added new ones. As stated, I'm sure it was to garnish to an newer/broader audience, but in doing so, why not incorporate a way to program each button sensor to the users preference?
My two button's worth.
Who can post screenshot of device info hw app from playmarket? Camera tab which must state what sensors LG utilizes in V40
Billy Madison said:
Who can post screenshot of device info hw app from playmarket? Camera tab which must state what sensors LG utilizes in V40
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This help?
ps3hacker3 said:
This help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, "supported 7" isn't what I expected
Seems LG wants to cheat us somehow, why would it hide info about utilized sensors if it's not install different and cheapest ones for different markets? And we still don't know what sensor used in telephoto module, they say it's 1.0 mkm only, maybe even worse and cheaper than IMX351?
I'm getting tired of the "LG doesn't do anything different" garbage. Wide angle lens, stereo recording, unbelievable dac, headphone jack, aptx-hd support, MQA support, receiver-as-mic, HD recording, etc. Most phones don't have ANY of those things. LG's problem is that they keep technology rather than playing the Pixel game where they take features away then Pat themselves on the back when they reintroduce them.
LG suffers from a few things.....a terrible (and undeserved) image that reviewers and tech journalists refuse to let go of and a scarce marketing budget. Before the idiots scream bootloop let's remember that Samsung's phones we're literally blowing up. LG has an image problem and the reality is that they make one of the more well rounded phones out there.
I agree with @blown89.
I enjoyed the V10, V20, V30 (for 3 months before screen took a hit), then back to the V20 ... and now the V40. The improvements are on point and usually add up to a better product.
Except ... (laughing as I type this) ... One has to wonder how they let us turn on the screen from the Fingerprint Sensor ... but not turn out off that way!?!
Someone never came back from lunch to finish coding that button - - where is it normal to turn on things with one switch and turn them off with another ... LOLOL.
I know my complaint will soon have a remedy ... but it really is a stupid set up from factory.
SaintlySins said:
I agree with @blown89.
I enjoyed the V10, V20, V30 (for 3 months before screen took a hit), then back to the V20 ... and now the V40. The improvements are on point and usually add up to a better product.
Except ... (laughing as I type this) ... One has to wonder how they let us turn on the screen from the Fingerprint Sensor ... but not turn out off that way!?!
Someone never came back from lunch to finish coding that button - - where is it normal to turn on things with one switch and turn them off with another ... LOLOL.
I know my complaint will soon have a remedy ... but it really is a stupid set up from factory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. At I type this my finger is resting on the fingerprint reader. It's easier to get that button that my finger is already on rather than change my grip, slide the phone down, and stretch for the power button. It's an underrated feature I wish they had retained. Having two separate power buttons doesn't make sense
Billy Madison said:
Thanks, "supported 7" isn't what I expected
Seems LG wants to cheat us somehow, why would it hide info about utilized sensors if it's not install different and cheapest ones for different markets? And we still don't know what sensor used in telephoto module, they say it's 1.0 mkm only, maybe even worse and cheaper than IMX351?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG is reusing 3 camera sensors from v30 and 1 front camera sensor from LG g7. 1 selfie & wide angle sensor from v20 https://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-v40/how-to/lg-v40-pentacamera-sensors-t3870789
harysviewty said:
LG is reusing 3 camera sensors from v30 and 1 front camera sensor from LG g7. https://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-v40/how-to/lg-v40-pentacamera-sensors-t3870789
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, I still may get either Sony IMX363 or Samsung S5K2L7 and wouldn't know which one I've got received? That's too bad.
And Samsung S5K3M3 in telephoto either isn't very promising, lacking OIS and having got only EIS
I'll definitely skip V40 myself, keeping G7. And if G8 won't get vastly better I seem to be inclining to get Samsung instead of failing LG
Billy Madison said:
So, I still may get either Sony IMX363 or Samsung S5K2L7 and wouldn't know which one I've got received? That's too bad.
And Samsung S5K3M3 in telephoto either isn't very promising, lacking OIS and having got only EIS
I'll definitely skip V40 myself, keeping G7. And if G8 won't get vastly better I seem to be inclining to get Samsung instead of failing LG
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually IMX363 & s5k2l7 are made to be identical. Some phones also use both variants on their camera (Xiaomi mi/redmi series). Just like imx333 & s5k2l2 (Samsung s/note8), imx345 & s5k2l3 (Samsung s/note9), imx298 & s5k2p7 (LG V20/V34/Q8/G7fit)

Con me out of selling my 6T.

So, I landed a 6T for a steal. I wasn't even in the market to replace my G6 (US997, rooted), but here I am.
As of right now, the only distinct advantages the 6T has over the LG G6 are:
Pie
Far smoother operation
Larger screen
Infinitely better aftermarket support (roms etc)
The G6 has my heart in:
Power button being on the back (Yes, I know I'll get used to the side button again).
SD Card Slot (I have a 256gb collecting dust now)
Pixel density
Quick Charge
Always On Display
Integrated headphone jack (although I rarely use my wired headphones anymore)
And right now, I'm on the fence:
Call quality (seems to be a wash)
Display clarity (wash again, despite the pixel density)
and the biggest thing to me, is the camera. I know I'm missing the wide angle from the G6. But is it just me, or is the camera just sort of meh on the 6T?
It seems to charge very slow when not connected to the included charger (which I can't seem to find in stock anywhere?)
I landed it with a case and screen protector for 350. I know I can sell it for that or maybe even up to 400. But I'm not sure I want to. I want to love this thing. It feels so nice in my hand. The battery on it is as big as a freakin car battery. It's more modern than my G6, has better specs. Is definitely faster.
So tell me, what do I do here?
I sorta did the same. My previous phone was a G6. In my case that phone I got it basically for free when I renewed my contract.
LG G6
I hated the fact that I could not root it (in my country that model is bootloader locked).
I loved its camera, but the glass on top of it it's real trash because it scratched in a month or so even with a case and TLC.
I hated the battery not lasting more than 2 hours screen on time.
I hated the button and FP on the back.
I hated the OS, stuttered and most of all, bloated (more of a carrier problem than a phone problem I know).
I hated being stuck on an older Android version.
I hated the screen because I got some screen burn-in issues, but fortunately with no permanent damage (reversible).
I too used it with a 200GB memory card, but the horrible management of the 4GB of RAM and 32GB internal storage meant that I was constantly running out of space. Even if you move apps to external storage, some huge chunks of data remain internally.
I was on the fence between getting the Huawei P20 Pro or the OP6T, and I decided to try the OP6T with 8GM RAM and 256GB Storage and boy o boy, I can't complain at all!
OnePlus 6T
The sheer speed of this phone is amazing! In all these years with Android (I started in 2007) I have never enjoyed a phone this much!
I love the fact that I'm always getting more than 7 hours screen on time with extensive use!
I love the tiny camera notch!
This phone is stupid FAAAAASTTTT!!!
And the fast charge on the OP6T is far FAR superior to that on the LGG6. Every morning I charge my OP6T while getting ready for work and about 40-45 minutes later is already at 100%. No more leaving the phone on my nightstand charging overnight!
OxygenOS is simply the best Android iteration ever created!
OnePlus Android updates and beta program is amazing!
So freaking easy to root.
OnePlus community is awesome (not that xda forums are not cool, but you get my point).
The huge RAM and Storage makes it future proof for many years to come if I desire to keep it that long.
Last but not least, the on-screen fingerprint scanner is a great conversation starter and wow factor. (mine works flawlessly)
This is simply no fair comparison, the LG G6 feels dated in comparison.
I don't miss the audio jack because I'm always listening over Bluetooth.
I don't miss the higher DPI because the OP6T screen despite having less DPI looks stunning!
I don't miss the external storage option on the LGG6
I don't miss the wide angle lens on the main camera, but I do miss the wide angle lens on the front camera.
This is my experience so far!
Cheers mate!
sell it; I'll give you 50 bucks for it
aNGERY said:
So, I landed a 6T for a steal. I wasn't even in the market to replace my G6 (US997, rooted), but here I am.
As of right now, the only distinct advantages the 6T has over the LG G6 are:
Pie
Far smoother operation
Larger screen
Infinitely better aftermarket support (roms etc)
The G6 has my heart in:
Power button being on the back (Yes, I know I'll get used to the side button again).
SD Card Slot (I have a 256gb collecting dust now)
Pixel density
Quick Charge
Always On Display
Integrated headphone jack (although I rarely use my wired headphones anymore)
And right now, I'm on the fence:
Call quality (seems to be a wash)
Display clarity (wash again, despite the pixel density)
and the biggest thing to me, is the camera. I know I'm missing the wide angle from the G6. But is it just me, or is the camera just sort of meh on the 6T?
It seems to charge very slow when not connected to the included charger (which I can't seem to find in stock anywhere?)
I landed it with a case and screen protector for 350. I know I can sell it for that or maybe even up to 400. But I'm not sure I want to. I want to love this thing. It feels so nice in my hand. The battery on it is as big as a freakin car battery. It's more modern than my G6, has better specs. Is definitely faster.
So tell me, what do I do here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
G6 has your heart with Quick charge? The OnePlus 6T is one of the fastest charging phones there is.
lg sucks i own 2 still but UI is slow they mess a kernel up don't support developers less everything that's like pulling out the old Razer phone
aNGERY said:
So, I landed a 6T for a steal. I wasn't even in the market to replace my G6 (US997, rooted), but here I am.
As of right now, the only distinct advantages the 6T has over the LG G6 are:
Pie
Far smoother operation
Larger screen
Infinitely better aftermarket support (roms etc)
The G6 has my heart in:
Power button being on the back (Yes, I know I'll get used to the side button again).
SD Card Slot (I have a 256gb collecting dust now)
Pixel density
Quick Charge
Always On Display
Integrated headphone jack (although I rarely use my wired headphones anymore)
And right now, I'm on the fence:
Call quality (seems to be a wash)
Display clarity (wash again, despite the pixel density)
and the biggest thing to me, is the camera. I know I'm missing the wide angle from the G6. But is it just me, or is the camera just sort of meh on the 6T?
It seems to charge very slow when not connected to the included charger (which I can't seem to find in stock anywhere?)
I landed it with a case and screen protector for 350. I know I can sell it for that or maybe even up to 400. But I'm not sure I want to. I want to love this thing. It feels so nice in my hand. The battery on it is as big as a freakin car battery. It's more modern than my G6, has better specs. Is definitely faster.
So tell me, what do I do here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG G6 a lot slower.
Snapdragon 821 vs Snapdragon 845.
Not even in the same league. 6 month old phone vs almost two year old phone.
I had an LG G6 and traded it for an Essential PH-1.
Sold the Essential when the 6T came out and have not looked back.
The 6T is just a better all around phone.
The 6T is dual SIM which made it a no brainer for me. I was carrying a work phone and a personal phone.
I carry one phone now.
I don't have 2 sims, but I don't disagree about the hardware being superior. I actually wiped the phone last night, put my sim in my G6, and about an hour later, I started setting up the 6T again. I'm on it now.
I'm not going to make any hasty decisions. Probably will give this thing a week.
As I type this, the biggest thing to adapt to is the SD card slot being absent.
Am I being too hard on the camera?
G6 is garbage
If 6T it's slow or seems slow, format the phone or do a MSM tool.
Yes the camera is maybe the cheapest..., but in daylight take good pictures. At night not so good. For camera you can try Google cam.
Reuben_skelz92 said:
G6 is garbage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compared to a 6T it is.
For camera, try the Pixel camera. See separate thread.
aNGERY said:
I don't have 2 sims, but I don't disagree about the hardware being superior. I actually wiped the phone last night, put my sim in my G6, and about an hour later, I started setting up the 6T again. I'm on it now.
I'm not going to make any hasty decisions. Probably will give this thing a week.
As I type this, the biggest thing to adapt to is the SD card slot being absent.
Am I being too hard on the camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also came from the G6. I do miss the wide angle camera and the overall photo quality from the G6. Also was a fan of water resistance rating, mil-spec drop rating, and the power button/fingerprint sensor on the back. The G6 really felt good in the hand, but the performance difference between it and my 6T are night and day. I don't think I could go back to the G6 from a performance standpoint.
I think you should sell it.
However, having someone else decided what phone you use will never end well.
Only thing that bothers me about the phone is that fp doesn't work on custom ROMs wich combined with the bad ram management on stock oos is kinda annoying.
About the camera. I find it rather inconsistent. Sometimes i get pretty good shots and sometimes they are just lousy. Anyway it's a tiny phone cam and as such it simply suffers physical limitations.
Sell it!
You paid for it.
tet-bundy said:
Only thing that bothers me about the phone is that fp doesn't work on custom ROMs wich combined with the bad ram management on stock oos is kinda annoying.
About the camera. I find it rather inconsistent. Sometimes i get pretty good shots and sometimes they are just lousy. Anyway it's a tiny phone cam and as such it simply suffers physical limitations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bad RAM management?
Do you have a 6GB device?
I'm reading through this post on my g6 while I let the 6t sit and try to figure out what's giving me wakelocks.
This thing is tiny and slow in comparison lol. I'm glad I'm giving it another go. Appreciate the opinions.
Reasons why I buy OP phones
Nearly native Android experience
Always rootable - I will not touch a phone I can't put Adaway on
Fast updates - almost as fast as the Pixels
Battery that lasts and lasts
Price/performance that can't be beat
Things that could be better
Camera is definitely a meh. Shutter delay is notable and limiting for anything but static scenes. Auto WB is way out of wack in anything but mid day blue sky conditions, and even setting WB manually leaves you with funky casts. This is particularly troublesome with skin tones, where your choice is between a "boiled shrimp" and "jaundice sickness" appearance. I don't use the camera for anything other than utilitarian purposes so this is a don't care, but if my phone was my primary camera I would definitely think twice.
Designs are somewhat bland, but this is probably partly how they keep the price as low as it is. I could not care less, as long as the formfactor is right. Which it is.
tech_head said:
Bad RAM management?
Do you have a 6GB device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8 GB

Reasons why I bought 7 pro S10 plus owner

Where do I start with this, well let's start with my S10 plus 512gb version as that was my daily driver since launch. For me that's a seriously long time to stay with the same phone. It still is top notch, pardon the punt.
I never thought I would leave my favourite phone for so many reasons on the shelve to pickup the cheaper Oneplus.
The following are the reasons why I'm currently holding on to Oneplus 7 pro, the features which I most impressed with:
1. QHD 6.67" amoled screen, vibrant big and bright all screen. Nearly as vibrant as Samsung's screen.
2. Camera best Oneplus have produced. Images sharp with good detail, really impressed. Obviously not as good as Samsung's but for me good enough. I'm not a massive picture taker or selfies person.
3. Loud dual speakers, again this is top notch. Not as full or rich sound as S10 plus but it's darn close. Another surprise.
4. Triple SSS performance (coin that one) - Super smooth speedy performance. No strutting or freezing experienced yet.
5. Near stock firmware with a few Oneplus touches.
6. Quick updates to latest Android software.
7. Pop up camera prefer it over the hole in the screen, use it unlock phone as it's cool.
8. That damn refresh rate, boy ow boy is it smooth. This has completely spoilt me, it's fluid. This was always missing in android phones when comparing to iPhone. It's not perfect but it's brilliant.
It's pricey but when I consider how much other flagships are selling for its value for money.
I would pick this phone over every other phone even though it doesn't have wireless charging and waterproof ratings and only 256gb storage. Anyone overly reliant on these features then this phone isn't for you. Fortunately I'm not and I'm sticking with it for as long as I can.
So far I haven't missed my s10 plus and I'm glad Oneplus took this flagship route too. And I'm glad they've given people choice of going premium or the cheaper version.
Any questions give me a shout.
totally agree with everything you wrote!
This is my first day using this phone, also switching from the s10+ 512
Also I have come from the S10+ 8/512gb Ceramic White, whilst I very much enjoyed my experience, and Samsung produced a solid device.
The user experience is the selling point for OnePlus, it is simply untouched at this point, it's a perfect blend if you will.
I'm not saying I had any issues with my S10+ it was smooth, and OneUI is a remarkable improvement. However there was 4 Solid reasons for me to switch.
1)The 90htz all screen display, now I have experienced 90htz with the R.O.G and it's something I very much appreciate, also an uninterrupted screen, (the punch hole is not bad) but having the Find X and Next previously I grew to appreciated (no interruptions).
2)30w Fast charging, yeah this is a great thing (currently have 44w with my Vivo IQOO) and when using the S10+ with 15w it was painstakingly slow in comparisons.
3)UFS 3.0 now this was included in the "Galaxy Fold" why it wasn't present in the S10+ or even the 5G variant is Monday boggling, as clearly it can be massed produced and Samsung are in the semiconductor industry so "confused" but another reason to switch it up.
4) Software oh boy do I fully appreciate oxygenOS is clean, well optimised and has a fine blend. It's almost perfect, and in some ways better than stock itself (although it's close to)
5)ok I'm adding in but it is a great development device, still now OnePlus are friendly in this regard and in my opinion I think they are fully sensible as they learn so much from this, the development community gives them information on what we want improved, implemented, the likes and dislikes, even development that makes things better like Gcam, they learn from this. So their is no arrogance, this I like.
Samsung are closing doors and TWRP has to run on the boot partition now (not good).
So I'm not saying the S10+ is not a great device it's fantastic, it's just not quite as good as a user experience you get with OnePlus. Ok camera needs work on the 7 Pro, but I think it will get there and for the pics I take it's perfectly acceptable.
Will get my 7 Pro tomorrow, looking forward to that great user experience.
I only wish the oneplus had the gs10 plus type of curve display since they decided on a curve. The gs10 plus curves almost at the end of the border while the 7 pro curves at 75% of the screen.
I also switched from an S10+ for the display without a notch, better update support, and overall smoothness of OnePlus phones. I'm deciding whether or not to keep it as a back up since the resale value has plummeted.
Goodbye to my nice S10 Plus and hello cool 1+7Pro! Cheers
I honestly was debating whether to get the S10 plus or the 7 pro. Decided on the 7 pro and was going to think about it for the next week since I have 14 days from date of purchase to return the phone. My mind is made up now so now I'm trying to get my wife one now.
I own both the 7 Pro and the S10+
This is coming from someone who hasn't owned a Samsung since the Note 4 and has owned almost every OnePlus device.
While the 7 Pro is a really good phone the S10+ is just better. The only things better on the 7 Pro is the screen scrolling (90htz), OnePlus gestures (best Android gestures hands down), UFS 3.0 storage, and screen off gestures.
The fingerprint reader is faster on the 7 Pro but the fingerprint reader on S10+ works when your fingers are wet, and you don't need to wake the screen to use it.
I do like the size of the 7 Pro (I like bigger phones) but in-hand the S10+ feels better, 7 Pro is thicker than the S10+.
Samsung's new One UI is nothing like the old Touchwiz. The S10+ has so many customization option it's not even funny. I have found no reason to want to root the S10+ (coming from someone who has rooted every single phone they have owned).
7 Pro camera is ok but the camera on the S10+ is good if not great (not Pixel great).
The S10+ will be my daily driver and the 7 Pro will be my rooting, flashing, playing around on phone.
I have both the S10 5g and OP7 Pro. Both are outstanding devices. You can't go wrong with either. But the price difference can't be overlooked. With tax, the S10 5g (512gb) is double that of the OP7 Pro. Think about that for a minute...DOUBLE!! How may things can you think of that are half the price of the competition and actually better?!?!? I can't think of any. Says a lot about OP and what they have accomplished. There are obviously pros/cons with both devices. Depends what your needs are. Kudos to Samsung & OnePlus for making great devices!
Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
I may be only one, but I think the overall performance of the 7 pro is in a whole other league. I've yet to ever see this thing stutter at anything I've done on it. Cannot say the same about my current S10+ ceramic or any other one I've had including the crazy 12gb 1T variant. I've had the U, U1, W, F and F/DS and most of the time phone will stutter. It was most noticable when unlocking it and going to the home screen, mind you my home screen is not a clutter fest but a simple single row of 5 icons and one clock. Then in general use, chrome would take a bit to open etc.
Then there is the wireless power share, total gimmick if you ask me. It's cool sure, but useful to what degrees? Maybe if you got the Galaxy buds (which wore also asstwine aipod sounding hot garbage) and charge them when going to bed.
Wireless charging? Could careless for it, never use it anyway.
Built quality tho will have to go to Samsung. The 7 pro feels nice in the hand and you can feel it's much better then the 6T which felt like a $200 toy but it can't beat the feel of the S10+. I've also noticed OnePlus uses some sort of lower quality of metal for their housing as I'm noticing some fine scratches from 2 days of use and being super careful with it. Never had that issue with the s10+, no case ever, no screen protector and not a single micro scratch.
Coming from a Note 9....I really like OP font and speed. As others mentioned, even chrome is faster loading. Yes the screen on the Note is much better and the gcam loaded on the Note owns OP...for now anyways, but something about this phone smoothness and speed has me hooked on it. I'm still in the 14 day window on it and thus still deciding to keep it... But otherwise I love it. Love the OS, speed, gestures, etc. The screen curve is ok, but could have been better. Look at it like this guy's.... It's better than what's coming from pixel 4....
True, the Pixel's are always behind and have a hard time catching up with once a year release...
What I prefer Samsung S10 plus ceramic
over Oneplus 7 pro.
S10 plus build quality ceramic version feels and looks much more premium
S10 plus is thinner
S10 plus speakers
S10 plus camera and video recording options
S10 plus 512gb memory option
Would I go back to S10 probably not as I'm Oneplus is almost my ideal phone. After using Oneplus software, screen refresh and triple SSS performance I couldn't.

OP7T Pro consumer theory

This is just my personal opinion, but I feel like OnePlus is just now testing the waters with their consumers now that they're out in the open. The 7T pro's extreme similarities and marginal upgrades as compared to the other models released this year just doesn't make logical sense for the price points. I think it's simply a consumer experiment made intentionally by OnePlus just to "feel out" where they're at with their customers. If a lot of people pay for "something new" with minimal changes, OnePlus knows how to tweak their sales scheme to target the flagship industry. My advice to everyone would be to hold off, don't spend money on the 7T pro and just go with the 7T. If you want to keep OnePlus 8 sales prices down I would highly suggest this.
OnePlus will likely keep coming with future pro models, but I feel like it's a bit early in the game and highly unlikely that they will continue to manufacture 4 models a year. So what you don't want to do is go buy the 7T Pro, show them that you're willing to pay that much more for marginal improvements and then give them the green light to go full blown with the ridiculous priced flagship OEMs. What you want to happen is for the Pro variants to be just as good as the 7 generation were. What you don't want to happen is for OnePlus to realize how impulsive people can be and then they skimp on the regular (8) and T (8T) models so that they can wait to pack all major upgrades into one 1100 dollar phone. Ideally you want 3 releases, the regular model (#), the T model (#T) and the Pro model and you want the price points pretty much where they fall with the current 7 generation with the exception of the 7T pro. I think it would be very smart to not buy the 7T pro.
I bought the 7T Pro at the pop-up event and I'm truely loving it. I was already in love with the 7 Pro because of it's display, but did not get it because I had just bought the 6T few months earlier in January. I decided I'd rather wait 6 months and see what the 7T Pro would end up like. I'm a big OnePlus fan since the very beginning, being one of the first few to get a OnePlus One. So I already knew that waiting for the upgraded T-model was most often worth it.
Off course while watching the launch event live I got really disappointed to finally find out I waited 6 months for no noticable changes. (Something I'm not used to from OnePlus, knowing them since, and owning one of the first, OnePlus One.) And that compared to the 7T, the only NOTICABLE difference that's ''Pro'' is an edge-to-edge display wich will cost you €160 extra.
But coming from a 6T, as soon as I finally got the 7T Pro and used it for some time, that disappointment was quickly forgotten.
I think the only people who will buy the 7T Pro are either: -really loving the edge-to-edge display
-smartphone/Android enthusiasts
-power users
-not informed about the minor differences with the 7T, thinking ''the more it costs, the better it is''.
-Well aware of the differences and still want to pay extra for whatever personal reason I couldn't think off.
But the average consumer finds that €599 for the 7T is already expensive enough for a phone and won't even think about paying €160 extra for the Pro model.
But.. I want a 1100 dollar device with EVERYTHING.. I picked a OnePlus phone because of software, not price.
Enjoy your new toy!
I don't know if it's different in other countries, but here in Germany the 7T is only available with 128GB and not with 256GB like the 7T Pro. For me these additional 128GB ARE another NOTICIBLE difference between 7T and 7T Pro. And when I look at other brands like for example Apple, they charge 100€ extra for REALLY just additional 128GB in the iPhone 11. So compared to this offer the 160€ for 256GB instead of 128GB, notch-less design, higher resolution screen, bigger battery etc. are not a really bad offer.
Yes, the 7T is a great phone with a nice price, but in my opinion the 7T Pro is too!
TarkoonXDA said:
... notch-less design...!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my primary reason. Never will own a phone with a notch. Maybe US will get the Pro. OP is playing games with network exclusivity.
Yep, I left Pixels because of their big ridiculous notches & bezels!
I'm waiting for McLaren edition and already pre-ordered, and 7T Pro is first phone which i'd like to buy since my Nexus 6 in 2014, so that theory with sales, i'll pass it, OP 8 on leaked photos have punch hole, that's a big nono for me, and i has OP7 Pro hands-on for couple hours and really like it, so i think you must listen to your heart and if you found your eyecandy, go with it!
TAGTRAUM said:
I'm waiting for McLaren edition and already pre-ordered, and 7T Pro is first phone which i'd like to buy since my Nexus 6 in 2014, so that theory with sales, i'll pass it, OP 8 on leaked photos have punch hole, that's a big nono for me, and i has OP7 Pro hands-on for couple hours and really like it, so i think you must listen to your heart and if you found your eyecandy, go with it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well keep in mind another potential future candidate will be (being that OnePlus continues to buy displays from Samsung) the under display camera that is now being marketed to come possibly with the Galaxy S11. Of course that probably means two more generations away for OnePlus, but that's the candy.
Causical said:
Well keep in mind another potential future candidate will be (being that OnePlus continues to buy displays from Samsung) the under display camera that is now being marketed to come possibly with the Galaxy S11. Of course that probably means two more generations away for OnePlus, but that's the candy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can be wrong, but read somewhere that S11 will still have punch hole, and nextgen in 2021-2022 will be totally without bezels. And to be honest, i'm not excited about phones nowadays, back in time i was absolutely crazy about any bleeding edge feature in every phone/electronics, in 2019/2020 phone is utility, but mclaren is at least beautiful with this accents and carbon/alcantara instead psychodelic samsung back (b!#ch please), and apple unisex "must like everyone" boring design not for me
galaxys said:
Yep, I left Pixels because of their big ridiculous notches & bezels!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Google is 1.5 years behind the market and I still do not understand why people still buy Pixels. They are like a left behind iPhone basically.
I would just fire Pixel's design team and start anew.
ramrstf4 said:
I think Google is 1.5 years behind the market and I still do not understand why people still buy Pixels. They are like a left behind iPhone basically.
I would just fire Pixel's design team and start anew.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, they only have one release a year, so always behind. They have a different one making the phone every year, so always 1st generation!
The real issue is people buying phones every year / 6 months.
I've bought the 7T Pro on Tuesday and is my fourth android phone since 2010, upgraded from a Moto X Style from 2015 running Lineage 16.
The borderless and notchless display is great although I'm not really a fan of curved edges but hey, it was either this or the Mi 9T Pro / Redmi K20 Pro.
I didn't go for the 7T because of the notch (I hate notches) and the back camera module is not pleasant to see.
I've seen the leaks of OP8 and punch hole cameras are not my thing.
I think launching devices twice a year just makes the early buyers frustrated and they add nothing new, actually It's getting quite difficult to add new hardware features to these devices and some of them are niche things that most people will use for 5 minutes and that it.
In the end people just tend to want the latest thing even if it brings nothing new, unfortunately, just look at the iPhone, good performance but the "new" features are things android had for years, yet people still buy them like bread.
TAGTRAUM said:
I can be wrong, but read somewhere that S11 will still have punch hole, and nextgen in 2021-2022 will be totally without bezels. And to be honest, i'm not excited about phones nowadays, back in time i was absolutely crazy about any bleeding edge feature in every phone/electronics, in 2019/2020 phone is utility, but mclaren is at least beautiful with this accents and carbon/alcantara instead psychodelic samsung back (b!#ch please), and apple unisex "must like everyone" boring design not for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true, its only the aesthetics for the mclaren and i waited for black friday to catch it, else for the price tag i would have got any of the high end OEMs in the market
OP used to have decent price range which is not the case anymore, its a shame.
kadopt said:
The real issue is people buying phones every year / 6 months.
I've bought the 7T Pro on Tuesday and is my fourth android phone since 2010, upgraded from a Moto X Style from 2015 running Lineage 16.
The borderless and notchless display is great although I'm not really a fan of curved edges but hey, it was either this or the Mi 9T Pro / Redmi K20 Pro.
I didn't go for the 7T because of the notch (I hate notches) and the back camera module is not pleasant to see.
I've seen the leaks of OP8 and punch hole cameras are not my thing.
I think launching devices twice a year just makes the early buyers frustrated and they add nothing new, actually It's getting quite difficult to add new hardware features to these devices and some of them are niche things that most people will use for 5 minutes and that it.
In the end people just tend to want the latest thing even if it brings nothing new, unfortunately, just look at the iPhone, good performance but the "new" features are things android had for years, yet people still buy them like bread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ordered a Oneplus 7T Pro when I saw the first pictures of the coming OP8 with punch-hole. I don´t like it either. I was coming from a Oneplus 5T, so I don´t change the phone every year. I think the big camera module on the 7T will make the phone less durable.
subarctic2123 said:
I ordered a Oneplus 7T Pro when I saw the first pictures of the coming OP8 with punch-hole. I don´t like it either. I was coming from a Oneplus 5T, so I don´t change the phone every year. I think the big camera module on the 7T will make the phone less durable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@kadopt
I just got the 7T pro too when I saw the 8. I'm upgrading from a 3T. Everything is great, but the curved screen is bothering me so much I'm considering returning it and sticking to my op3t even though it's 4 years old. The glare I can work around, but it distorts the image at edges, how do you live with that? Most display reviews barely mention it. I'm really on the fence about this, not sure what to do. Can't find a phone exactly like the 7T Pro but with a flat display. Does anyone have any alternatives they could recommend?
@anupritaisno1 and @Nezorflame you both went from a 3 to a 7 pro too right? Any thoughts?
All these gimmicks, punch hole, notch, curved.. sigh just give me a flat normal display. @nvertigo67 @BillGoss any thoughts on newer phones or curved edges? I read your post from a while ago on keeping your op3 billgoss. I've been on NLOS 16 and LOS 17 for too long to settle with OOS (although it's usable), but luckily there seem to be fastboot flashable ROMs even though a working TWRP isn't available yet for all the Android 10 changes like dynamic partitions.
The only other thing about the hardware that bothered me was no headphone jack, but I got the bullets wireless v2 for free with the phone. As for software, by far the most annoying issue is the back gesture which interferes with pulling out the sidebar. Not to mention most videos don't even use the full display.
As for the durability of the camera module, I think moving parts (pop up camera on the 7T pro) over the size seems more likely to fail sooner, in theory. Although apparently OP tested it and rates it for 300,000 cycles.
@knpk13 hello there.
To be honest with you, I'm really OK with the curved edges (I've owned Samsung Galaxy S6 edge before, so it's not my first curved display) and don't mind the slight distortion (which I actually don't notice much when looking at the display).
Since I own the 7 Pro, I have 100% of the screen for myself, combined with the fullscreen gestures it's an absolute beauty. I like the motorized camera solution as well, and since I absolutely despise the cutouts, it's my only option. I barely use the front-facing camera at all, would actually prefer to have a phone without a front-facing camera at all, but alas
So in terms of the display I can't complain.
Nezorflame said:
To be honest with you, I'm really OK with the curved edges (I've owned Samsung Galaxy S6 edge before, so it's not my first curved display) and don't mind the slight distortion (which I actually don't notice much when looking at the display).
I like the motorized camera solution as well, and since I absolutely despise the cutouts, it's my only option. I barely use the front-facing camera at all, would actually prefer to have a phone without a front-facing camera at all, but alas
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, I guess it's my first curved display and it the distortion really stood out. I'll give it a few more days. As for the camera module, I'm actually happy with this solution, I was replying to the person I quoted. I don't use the front camera much either, so as long as it lasts a few years I'm ok with it.
knpk13 said:
...
All these gimmicks, punch hole, notch, curved.. sigh just give me a flat normal display. @[email protected] any thoughts on newer phones or curved edges? I read your post from a while ago on keeping your op3 billgoss. I've been on NLOS 16 and LOS 17 for too long to settle with OOS (although it's usable), but luckily there seem to be fastboot flashable ROMs even though a working TWRP isn't available yet for all the Android 10 changes like dynamic partitions.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My views on new phones are:
- flagships are way too expensive. My 3T is about half the price on the 7T Pro. So I'm expecting to go with a mid-range phone for my next one (hopefully still a few years away)
- I don't have any issues with bezels. Esthetically a bezel-less screen is appealing, but functionally it's not significant (remember, these are my personal views)
- I don't like the size of the newer phones - too tall and too narrow. My sweet spot is between 5" and 6" and I like 16:9. I read a lot and prefer a format that is book-like.
- I don't see the point of curved screens. After all, I hold the phone by its sides and I don't want that to register as a screen touch. Go flat screens!
- And my key requirement is that I must be able to run a custom rom (I prefer LineageOS) because that significantly increases the life of security patching and Android updates. Vendors rarely go past 2 years support.
At this point I have no idea what phone I'd buy if my 3T died.
Sent from my OnePlus 3T using XDA Labs
BillGoss said:
At this point I have no idea what phone I'd buy if my 3T died.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know right? I like the 3T a lot. Didn't even want a new phone; wanted a tablet (very helpful for my sheet music and multimedia consumption and reading; I barely use any actual "phone" features) but couldn't really find any good ones other than apple or Samsung which are both really locked down. So I went for the biggest phone screen I could find. The 7T pro is somewhat usable for sheet music so I'm glad about that.
I was considering the Redmi K20 Pro (its called the Mi 9T Pro globally), Asus ROG 2, and the regular OP7T, all of which are around 40% cheaper than the OP7T Pro in my current region. The funny thing is in my region the 7T pro is still half the price of any Samsung or apple flagship lol. Was a nightmare to choose. As of right now, I think those are the devices that are closest to what you want. (The Asus should have custom ROMs soon as I heard Android 10 source just came out and devices just got sent to devs heard)
You could consider the Asus Zenfone 6 too I think. I do hope a nice flat screen device (no notch, hole, curves or anything) comes out soon; Sony might be the only hope. About accidental palm touches on the curved edges, I've actually never had any issue with that at all (it's not an extreme waterfall display unlike some other devices). No touch issues, just mostly miffed by the image distortion, and a little by the glare.
Edit: after using some of my heavier applications on the 7T Pro, I noticed that it uses around 6 of the 8gb of ram and keeps apps in memory and everything runs smoothly. My 3T barely uses 2 of 6gb and doesn't keep apps in memory, weird.

Categories

Resources