Android 4.0 For Samsung Galaxy Pocket (Further Development Attempt) - Samsung Galaxy Pocket

Hello!
I have old Galaxy Pocket, and when i saw that no one even tries anymore to do anything for this little cute phone, I'm gonna do it
And first, is gonna be Android 4.0
i know people already did that... but these version's didn't work fully , all of them had some sort of problems
and that's what i'm gonna try to do, I'm gonna modify and patch one of better version's of ICS for pocket that already exists
so... i guess that's it... I'm gonna update this when i will make some progress

QUIR-Research&Development said:
Hello!
I have old Galaxy Pocket, and when i saw that no one even tries anymore to do anything for this little cute phone, I'm gonna do it
And first, is gonna be Android 4.0
i know people already did that... but these version's didn't work fully , all of them had some sort of problems
and that's what i'm gonna try to do, I'm gonna modify and patch one of better version's of ICS for pocket that already exists
so... i guess that's it... I'm gonna update this when i will make some progress
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I made a "camera and mic fixed" but, still have bugs...
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AtgktraixCghnkfHvmEO0QWh0fNL?e=HEacm9

So any progress?
I am from the s5830i community and since our device share the same processor, I thought I can come and see if any of your bug fixes would work on the s5830i. Current issue is headphone routing but thing is I don't know if it is an issue for you guys with the Pocket.
Edit: Dug into the android development section a bit and found out you guys have the same front speaker and headphone routing issue.

hey, this is great man . i cant wait (i dont know if that you try to do works on my gt-s5301l or is the same). if you can do for a upper version of android (like 4.2) i would be happy. (do it if you want :v)

They aren't compatible
rodrigo151515151515151 said:
hey, this is great man . i cant wait (i dont know if that you try to do works on my gt-s5301l or is the same). if you can do for a upper version of android (like 4.2) i would be happy. (do it if you want :v)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, Pocket (S5300) and Pocket Plus (S5301) have different chipset and then aren't compatible.
There's currently a 4.2 ROM for you device, but it is in very early stage.
I also have a S5301L and I'm trying to make a decent ROM for this device, but the only and hardest problem is the touch driver not working. I'll post here if I can fix that, but seems that this will be really difficult (the original dev leaved the development 4 years ago for the same reason, broken touch).

MaicoLinuX said:
Nope, Pocket (S5300) and Pocket Plus (S5301) have different chipset and then aren't compatible.
There's currently a 4.2 ROM for you device, but it is in very early stage.
I also have a S5301L and I'm trying to make a decent ROM for this device, but the only and hardest problem is the touch driver not working. I'll post here if I can fix that, but seems that this will be really difficult (the original dev leaved the development 4 years ago for the same reason, broken touch).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, i see. its so good to hear this device will continue having "support" on this days..... ah no mames eres de buenos aires xd

any updates? is your interest in this device still there? best regards

Im very sorry for such a long unactivity , i still have interest in doing that update, i just had several work and device problems and i had to do something about them

It's bad that you also abandoned the firmware. And then I still use the pocket and there is not a single normal firmware

Alexey Orlov said:
It's bad that you also abandoned the firmware. And then I still use the pocket and there is not a single normal firmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy Pocket (GT-S5300) uses an ARMv6 processor, that core is nowadays weak and has a lot of limitations (most of them can only be passed by emulation, but as it's a weak cpu the performance would be terrible).

QUIR-Research&Development said:
Im very sorry for such a long unactivity , i still have interest in doing that update, i just had several work and device problems and i had to do something about them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you still doing it? How is progress going?

I'm trying to keep Galaxy Pocket alive with Custom Roms, but it doesn't work ...

QUIR-Research&Development said:
Im very sorry for such a long unactivity , i still have interest in doing that update, i just had several work and device problems and i had to do something about them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any update?? Please continue if you drop

Last seen: Nov 29, 2021
haizz...

Related

[Q] Ubuntu Touch for Galaxy S4 Active (i9295)

Hi all.
Anybody knows if Ubuntu Touch for Galaxy S 4 Active is being made?
Can we use the standard galaxy S4 build, if they manage to get it working on their system?
It is basically the same (same Processor, sound device, etc.), except for the camera.
I am willing to give 10 USD to the person who creates the first working beta
(I know its not much, but i am a student, so i dont have much money right now.. )
All the best,
Toby
Questions and help issues go in Q&A and Help section
Thread moved
Thanks
FNM
TobiasFP said:
Hi all.
Anybody knows if Ubuntu Touch for Galaxy S 4 Active is being made?
Can we use the standard galaxy S4 build, if they manage to get it working on their system?
It is basically the same (same Processor, sound device, etc.), except for the camera.
I am willing to give 10 USD to the person who creates the first working beta
(I know its not much, but i am a student, so i dont have much money right now.. )
All the best,
Toby
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also has a different screen amongst other things, meaning it needs a different kernel - different drivers. I wouldn't hold my breath on ANY more roms coming to the i9295. It simply didn't gain enough traction!
Cederic said:
It also has a different screen amongst other things, meaning it needs a different kernel - different drivers. I wouldn't hold my breath on ANY more roms coming to the i9295. It simply didn't gain enough traction!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the pick me up
But shouldnt all that needs changing be the blobs for the CM build?
Since Ubuntu touch relies on CyanogenMod to work, and since we have a pretty stable CM rom going, couldnt we just use the blobs from the i9505 build with minor adjustments to get going?
or have i misunderstood the build process?
TobiasFP said:
Thanks for the pick me up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heh, yes I'm a bit bitter. I'm planning to sell my active and get a nexus 5 instead thanks to the lack of developments, so I can't help but rub it in a bit on the way out. While there's been some upswing lately for the i537 thanks to safestrap, none of that translates to the i9295.
TobiasFP said:
But shouldnt all that needs changing be the blobs for the CM build?
Since Ubuntu touch relies on CyanogenMod to work, and since we have a pretty stable CM rom going, couldnt we just use the blobs from the i9505 build with minor adjustments to get going?
or have i misunderstood the build process?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I'm using the CM build from this forum as my daily user, and "pretty stable" is a good description. Not stable enough really, and the most pressing issue is the lack of official CM support to make it so. I don't know how easy it is, but quite obviously there's more to it than you'd think or it would have happened already. Samsung is (apparently) notorious for not making it easy in any way, so... I wouldn't hold out hope. Not since this device turned out to be so slowly adopted that there just doesn't seem to be enough developers interested.
Perhaps this will change over the year to come, but I doubt it, and I for one don't have time for it.
Cederic said:
Heh, yes I'm a bit bitter. I'm planning to sell my active and get a nexus 5 instead thanks to the lack of developments, so I can't help but rub it in a bit on the way out. While there's been some upswing lately for the i537 thanks to safestrap, none of that translates to the i9295.
Well, I'm using the CM build from this forum as my daily user, and "pretty stable" is a good description. Not stable enough really, and the most pressing issue is the lack of official CM support to make it so. I don't know how easy it is, but quite obviously there's more to it than you'd think or it would have happened already. Samsung is (apparently) notorious for not making it easy in any way, so... I wouldn't hold out hope. Not since this device turned out to be so slowly adopted that there just doesn't seem to be enough developers interested.
Perhaps this will change over the year to come, but I doubt it, and I for one don't have time for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, of course it is not easy, but what i was saying is, that when the i9505 gets going, which i believe it will, since they have been working on it for about a month now, i believe it could "easily" be converted to the i9295.
The i9505 is a lot more similar to the i9295 than the i537, they both share the same Krait processor, and the screen is already fully supported in the current CM build of the i9295, so i dont see that as a problem.
Of course it will take some time, but i believe (okay, a better word would be "hope") that when the i9505 has Ubuntu Touch ready, it will not take long for us.
See the development status here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2274387&page=4

[Q] [Discussion] The end of the Galaxy S Advance?

Hello everyone, I invite you to this talk to discuss this topic
Did the Galaxy S Advance came to an end?
I have seen many developers are abandoning the Janice and migrating to other devices, it is very normal, everyone wants a change sometimes
but I worry that we're running out ROMs, I understand that this device is 2 years old but I think he had very little time to live
Anyone else think the same? please I would like to leave your opinion on this topic.
¡Sorry for my bad English!
Epirex said:
Hello everyone, I invite you to this talk to discuss this topic
Did the Galaxy S Advance came to an end?
I have seen many developers are abandoning the Janice and migrating to other devices, it is very normal, everyone wants a change sometimes
but I worry that we're running out ROMs, I understand that this device is 2 years old but I think he had very little time to live
Anyone else think the same? please I would like to leave your opinion on this topic.
¡Sorry for my bad English!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could not tell I have not then I think this phone can not do more rom
Sorry for my bad English
Greetings from Costa Rica
XperiAMM
MaxiCM Team
Epirex said:
Hello everyone, I invite you to this talk to discuss this topic
Did the Galaxy S Advance came to an end?
I have seen many developers are abandoning the Janice and migrating to other devices, it is very normal, everyone wants a change sometimes
but I worry that we're running out ROMs, I understand that this device is 2 years old but I think he had very little time to live
Anyone else think the same? please I would like to leave your opinion on this topic.
¡Sorry for my bad English!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fact is that we do not have any active developer any more. Just look at our Development section. And I am afraid that we can't do anything about that.
shut_down said:
Fact is that we do not have any active developer any more. Just look at our Development section. And I am afraid that we can't do anything about that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly
Maybe there'll be some revival with coming lolipop? As I know (not really into this) TC did their job bottom up, so all we need now is some talented kid to step up and learn a bit and prepare for coming OS.:fingers-crossed:
shut_down said:
Fact is that we do not have any active developer any more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about vickiushu ?
What about AntresOne (he still is a dev but for other device) ?
Wysłane z mojego nexusowego tablecika.....
i believe we must understand and accept the scenario right now, right from the beginning this device has been struggling for some serious development due to lack of sources , but our capable and smart devs made efforts and as a result we had a variety of popular roms ported to our phone, but sad thing is the transition has been huge since this phone was launched, so its natural and logical for the devs to switch to other devices and for those who are still having the phone have fear of left alone but dont worry guys i think the devs are kind enough to continue bringing good stuff if anything major happens, although not frequently as it used to be
if we have only one good rom with support, we are done there is no need of many roms if that cannot happen according to me...
infacf even we too might eventually switch to a new device sooner or later
so chill, the change thats happening is natural and quite obvious, i just hope we continue to get support for aospa and cm ,
willi9070 said:
but our capable and smart devs made efforts and as a result we had a variety of popular roms ported to our phone,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
built from sources* NOT ported.
Guys,don't cry and think a bit at past of s avance ! You know,you can't improve a phone day by day,forever.It has an end due hardware limitation.Who thought that s advance will run cm10.2/11 ? Who tought that we will overclock cpu and gpu? Everyday we opened xda (at least me ) to see if cm10.2/cm11 was released.Let's see what we got until now:
1.Cm 10
2.Cm 10.1
3.Cm 10.2
4.Cm 11
5.Cocore kernel,overclocking cpu + gpu
6.Many roms
What you want more???Overclock to 2.0 Ghz? lol.Is hardware limitation.Also,maybe it can't run Android L.
We got everything is possible for our phone and it was improved alot from stock thanks to our developers.If i would have money,i will donate to them,they deserve.Without them,probably we sold our phone in 1 year.So, every phone has an end.
PS: i forgot to mention that our roms are FULLY WORKING
Force said:
built from sources* NOT ported.
Guys,don't cry and think a bit at past of s avance ! You know,you can't improve a phone day by day,forever.It has an end due hardware limitation.Who thought that s advance will run cm10.2/11 ? Who tought that we will overclock cpu and gpu? Everyday we opened xda (at least me ) to see if cm10.2/cm11 was released.Let's see what we got until now:
1.Cm 10
2.Cm 10.1
3.Cm 10.2
4.Cm 11
5.Cocore kernel,overclocking cpu + gpu
6.Many roms
What you want more???Overclock to 2.0 Ghz? lol.Is hardware limitation.Also,maybe it can't run Android L.
We got everything is possible for our phone and it was improved alot from stock thanks to our developers.If i would have money,i will donate to them,they deserve.Without them,probably we sold our phone in 1 year.So, every phone has an end.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt mean port in winzip method of ported i said that they ported cm etc unofficially as they are called unofficial ports and i am not questioning anybody's hardwork point here is different
and of android L don't be so negative, at the time of kitkat people used to say the same thing but we got it running, so don't predict anything before devs say anything crude after its full launch...
having said that i am not demanding anything i am just being optimistic as everything that this device got was more than expected and a surprise and i am happy with what we have for now
Perhaps the simple language is "Let it flow like water flowing" alone.
TPD-21 said:
Perhaps the simple language is "Let it flow like water flowing" alone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes of course, after all its just a phone : D
---------- Post added at 06:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:48 PM ----------
TPD-21 said:
Perhaps the simple language is "Let it flow like water flowing" alone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes of course, after all its just a phone
Force said:
built from sources* NOT ported.
Guys,don't cry and think a bit at past of s avance ! You know,you can't improve a phone day by day,forever.It has an end due hardware limitation.Who thought that s advance will run cm10.2/11 ? Who tought that we will overclock cpu and gpu? Everyday we opened xda (at least me ) to see if cm10.2/cm11 was released.Let's see what we got until now:
1.Cm 10
2.Cm 10.1
3.Cm 10.2
4.Cm 11
5.Cocore kernel,overclocking cpu + gpu
6.Many roms
What you want more???Overclock to 2.0 Ghz? lol.Is hardware limitation.Also,maybe it can't run Android L.
We got everything is possible for our phone and it was improved alot from stock thanks to our developers.If i would have money,i will donate to them,they deserve.Without them,probably we sold our phone in 1 year.So, every phone has an end.
PS: i forgot to mention that our roms are FULLY WORKING
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
never said we want more ROMs, The community achieved since earlier this year and was the difference in the ROMs that came and is grateful to Team Canjica!
But as TPD-21 said, you have to let everything flow as it should

Android L

Hello developers.Dont want to be annyoing but I'm new to this devicee and i kinda like it and tried lots and lots of roms for it, and you know that android L/Lollipop is coming soon out, and i want to ask if anyone is gonna like port it to our device because i know some really good developers like the major tonyp and other ones.So if yes i would be really really hyped for it like many other lol
i think that for the reply we have to wait CM12(?)sources comes out,but as i understood in the past our phone is supporting kitkat with a base that starts from ics sources,so we must wait and maybe isn't possible to port, but also for me it will be interesting if the devs can port a rom with lollipop.By the way i was thinking that we are running also some old version of the gapps to make it work with our device due to missing neon support(like youtube or google search for ex.),so don't know if it's possible
TheMysteryouse said:
Hello developers.Dont want to be annyoing but I'm new to this devicee and i kinda like it and tried lots and lots of roms for it, and you know that android L/Lollipop is coming soon out, and i want to ask if anyone is gonna like port it to our device because i know some really good developers like the major tonyp and other ones.So if yes i would be really really hyped for it like many other lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We had to wait 3 months for CM11 M1 to come out after KitKat was released, and knowing that Lollipop is quite a large overhaul and that it fully uses the ART runtime, we can expect a larger delay for CM12 M1. And even when it comes out, it will be almost featureless. As far as I know, Lollipop sources haven't been yet released, so we'll have to wait and see.
Second, yes, we are running on old ICS sources, so unless the 3.x kernel becomes super stable so we can use newer drivers, if they are available for our device, we'll have a bad time.
Third, this is a subforum for Development Discussion, so this kind of thread is more welcomed in the General Discussion section or even Q&A.
Keep on modding Other than that, KitKat development has been quite amazing in the last few months, and considering that the O2X is a device released in 2011, we are more than been blessed regarding this device. Ludnica, brate, ludnica.
Jes jes hahaha. Well whatever happens we will maybe be able to get something of it.I will try my best.I dont rly know much about coding but i know some stuff and i am learning every day more and more so yeah.I hope if we all combine our inteligence we will get something.
Oh and the sources should be out on i think November 5th
Testing Platform available
I like the idea of L for P990. I recently bought a new phone. That spares my P990 for testing full time as I have another phone for regular use. Please let me should you like to test anything, I will happily share the results. The least I can do to aid further development.

My theory for a possible bright future for G Flex

I reckon that android is not the future (since not much being done on it for the flex) but in fact windows 10 mobile.
Sounds crazy but if u look at it maybe it isn't:
The Xiaomi mi4 is a snapdragon 800 n that is one of the very very few phones atm that can run android or win10m.
Microsoft are big and experienced enough that I wouldn't be surprised if they released a universal ROM that works on multiple different kinds of systems ala much like normal windows can (Which is part of my expanded theory what they'll do to really penetrate the market).
Is there any hope in my theory? Lol
Anyone agree with me? Cmon I'm trying to bring hope to our beloved phone. Heh.
mrw187 said:
Anyone agree with me? Cmon I'm trying to bring hope to our beloved phone. Heh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanna believe it man! believe me!! but is there a real future for this monster of a phone?
2far said:
I wanna believe it man! believe me!! but is there a real future for this monster of a phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol cool somebody else has hope.
Of course man! I am unaware of cell phone getting a newer rom skipping various version of android but as we say theres always a first time for everything even though could be the last one we see. I mean this phone still pretty powerful though. D800 under hood, 2gigs starts to be n issue but who cares not every body uses 70 to 100 apps, plus we install roms specially to get the most out our devices! What is it?? What is making this premiun devices not to get enough android development!!??
mrw187 said:
I reckon that android is not the future (since not much being done on it for the flex) but in fact windows 10 mobile.
Sounds crazy but if u look at it maybe it isn't:
The Xiaomi mi4 is a snapdragon 800 n that is one of the very very few phones atm that can run android or win10m.
Microsoft are big and experienced enough that I wouldn't be surprised if they released a universal ROM that works on multiple different kinds of systems ala much like normal windows can (Which is part of my expanded theory what they'll do to really penetrate the market).
Is there any hope in my theory? Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are talking about a mobile phone that was completely abandoned by LG but had strong potential, i am literally still stuck at android 4.2.2 on this phone and i can tell you it is absolutely terrible , i am probably buying a letv 1 pro instead, basically my point is that this phone is dead and un supported by any one frankly
2far said:
I wanna believe it man! believe me!! but is there a real future for this monster of a phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2far said:
Of course man! I am unaware of cell phone getting a newer rom skipping various version of android but as we say theres always a first time for everything even though could be the last one we see. I mean this phone still pretty powerful though. D800 under hood, 2gigs starts to be n issue but who cares not every body uses 70 to 100 apps, plus we install roms specially to get the most out our devices! What is it?? What is making this premiun devices not to get enough android development!!??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
multimzain said:
you are talking about a mobile phone that was completely abandoned by LG but had strong potential, i am literally still stuck at android 4.2.2 on this phone and i can tell you it is absolutely terrible , i am probably buying a letv 1 pro instead, basically my point is that this phone is dead and un supported by any one frankly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn!! I feel sorry for you, you're even worse off lol at least I'm on KitKat.
Good for u bro, but O which this thing could get freacking N!

LG Urbane revival

As with the AW 2.0 Update from today, can we expect getting this forum active again? I am hoping to see an optimized kernel and rooted version of urbane to get maximum performance as i feel especially google assistant has become somewhat sluggish....
endrancer said:
As with the AW 2.0 Update from today, can we expect getting this forum active again? I am hoping to see an optimized kernel and rooted version of urbane to get maximum performance as i feel especially google assistant has become somewhat sluggish....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Waiting for kernel sources
Skin1980 said:
Waiting for kernel sources
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As am I :good::good:
I've had a kernel tree and ramdisk sitting on the backburner since October until AW 2.0 came out, was actually planning on releasing it for 1.5 if we didn't get any update from LG by the end of the month. Of course, now it'll need to be rebased over the new kernel source. Will do a TWRP build w/ f2fs support as well unless someone beats me to it.
little note, if anyone's cp'ing, don't pick the 2 squashfs commits, they're incorrect, just haven't had the time to do that myself
Bluenami said:
As am I :good::good:
I've had a kernel tree and ramdisk sitting on the backburner since October until AW 2.0 came out, was actually planning on releasing it for 1.5 if we didn't get any update from LG by the end of the month. Of course, now it'll need to be rebased over the new kernel source. Will do a TWRP build w/ f2fs support as well unless someone beats me to it.
little note, if anyone's cp'ing, don't pick the 2 squashfs commits, they're incorrect, just haven't had the time to do that myself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. I too feel that the new update is running sluggishly on my Urbane first generation too. Would GREATLY appreciate your efforts to provide us with a speedier version of it.
Skin1980 said:
Waiting for kernel sources
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel tree is out
Bluenami said:
Kernel tree is out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are there anyware custom roms with aw2 for thr the urbane 2?
I think AW2 is so crap that even customizing is couldn´t be a good system...
mtmello said:
I think AW2 is so crap that even customizing is couldn´t be a good system...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never really tried 1..5. is it better? what can we do with it than? i might give it a try
sebj84 said:
i never really tried 1..5. is it better? what can we do with it than? i might give it a try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is really very hard to tell you what is better in AW1.5 because almost all new thing in AW20 is bad! Gonna try to summarize in few words:
AW20 is a big change in the concept: from the AW1.5, smartwatch is a extension of your smartphone. AW2.0 is almost a smartphone in you wrist. Bad functionality, bad performance and bad concept! (I already have a smartphone and I don´t want another one in my wrist!).
mtmello said:
It is really very hard to tell you what is better in AW1.5 because almost all new thing in AW20 is bad! Gonna try to summarize in few words:
AW20 is a big change in the concept: from the AW1.5, smartwatch is a extension of your smartphone. AW2.0 is almost a smartphone in you wrist. Bad functionality, bad performance and bad concept! (I already have a smartphone and I don´t want another one in my wrist!).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok... i have to say i use the watch as second phone. for my private messaging and calls. than i can leave the work at home.
i think i go wit aw2 better than?
I just joined the smartwatch club and both of mine had AW2.0 .. so i'm not sure how it compares to AW1.5 but I do know I wish it did have more stand alone capability.. I would like to be able to see all my text messages and respond to certain ones and avoid taking my phone out of my pocket..
I do hope there will be more travel here on this forum.. doesn't seem like there is much activity anymore

Categories

Resources