Database Develop

Health Products

Hi, I have a Galaxy Note 2 (duh) and I am getting into more running, and over-all health related activities.
I use Runtastic, and there related applications to track my information.
I am wondering whats the best device for tracking heart rate and all that information that works with those apps? I am asking in this area because at the same time I am looking for an arm band that can hold my note 2, maybe even have one of those heart rate/health devices attached to it the arm bad that supports the note 2 as well.
I hope I am making sense.
Ideas?
Thanks.

bmancell said:
Hi, I have a Galaxy Note 2 (duh) and I am getting into more running, and over-all health related activities.
I use Runtastic, and there related applications to track my information.
I am wondering whats the best device for tracking heart rate and all that information that works with those apps? I am asking in this area because at the same time I am looking for an arm band that can hold my note 2, maybe even have one of those heart rate/health devices attached to it the arm bad that supports the note 2 as well.
I hope I am making sense.
Ideas?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also interested

The s health app has a few devices listed, did you check them out?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

Why did Samsung deceive me?

before putting on the market it was written that my Note 8 will record 4K video and 60 FPS. hell where we got it?

bassgenerator said:
before putting on the market it was written that my Note 8 will record 4K video and 60 FPS. hell where we got it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where?

Here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sityware.camera_mod_samsung_n8_bitrate_settings
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk

Logel said:
Here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sityware.camera_mod_samsung_n8_bitrate_settings
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man to wake up. I'm not going to root to lose the warranty.

Logel said:
Here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sityware.camera_mod_samsung_n8_bitrate_settings
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's nothing to do with Samsung. Its an app developed by an independent app developper.
During the unveilling of the Note 8, they only claimed 4k at 30fps

Praks93 said:
That's nothing to do with Samsung. Its an app developed by an independent app developper.
During the unveilling of the Note 8, they only claimed 4k at 30fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
claimed 60 FPS.
pleas translate you.
https://www.mojandroid.sk/samsung-galaxy-note-8-4k-60-fps/

bassgenerator said:
claimed 60 FPS.
pleas translate you.
https://www.mojandroid.sk/samsung-galaxy-note-8-4k-60-fps/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea what independent sites reported but do check the video of the unveilling. It was NEVER claimed that the Note 8 will do 4k at 60. The site you linked must have a typo.

Praks93 said:
I have no idea what independent sites reported but do check the video of the unveilling. It was NEVER claimed that the Note 8 will do 4k at 60. The site you linked must have a typo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk

Praks93 said:
I have no idea what independent sites reported but do check the video of the unveilling. It was NEVER claimed that the Note 8 will do 4k at 60. The site you linked must have a typo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suspect the confusion has arisen from tech sites quoting the capabilities of Exynos 8895 vs Snapdragon 835.
The processors maybe capable of 4K @ 60, but thats not to say it has been enabled in the phone its been put into. Samsung have their reasons for not unleashing its full power. Would love to know what they are.

Samsung is working in high-level fools who are subject to US influence as it is from all of them and Europe is just paying for it

bassgenerator said:
Samsung is working in high-level fools who are subject to US influence as it is from all of them and Europe is just paying for it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

jooniloh said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nothing personal my brother. but it's strange to me. Samsung's rivalry is built on the head

bassgenerator said:
nothing personal my brother. but it's strange to me. Samsung's rivalry is built on the head
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but they never deceived anyone... Lol. They said it was possibly capable of it. In the reveal they said it would be 4k @ 30fps
Hints:
http://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/galaxy-note8/specs/
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note8-8505.php
Both sites (and many more) list it as 4K @ 30fps.
EDIT: And about that "US Influence" thing, I don't know why we would influence 'our own products' as well, if anything we'd also like that feature. They have their reasons.

SD835 does not support the video allegedly shoot 60 fps. but the Exynos Yes. so because of this Samsung disable overall. This is my opinion but I could be wrong. We are far advanced in technology but this one I consider to be someone. because the camera can do that but the Samsung yet to limit us? a big mistake. Cheers.

bassgenerator said:
SD835 does not support the video allegedly shoot 60 fps. but the Exynos Yes. so because of this Samsung disable overall. This is my opinion but I could be wrong. We are far advanced in technology but this one I consider to be someone. because the camera can do that but the Samsung yet to limit us? a big mistake. Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's your opinion, you're not sure but you run with it as of its a fact? I'm confused.
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk

bassgenerator said:
man to wake up. I'm not going to root to lose the warranty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please remove yourself from XDA

meboy said:
Please remove yourself from XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you first ...)

bassgenerator said:
Samsung is working in high-level fools who are subject to US influence as it is from all of them and Europe is just paying for it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That just doesn't make sense.

Samsung didn't deceive you. Whatever you took as the word of God regarding the camera specs lied.

meboy said:
Please remove yourself from XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not everyone on XDA is all about rooting and roms. Some of us LIKE to use things like Android Pay and other apps that require Safetynet to function. This thread is about shooting video at a certain rate. sheesh.

Note 9 or P20 Pro

Hi all i currently have a P20 Pro dual sim but i am bored with the current lack of roms etc and im think of selling and getting a Note 9.
Which is the best version (Snapdragon or Exynos) looks like Exynos after a quick look in the forum?

Buy a Snapdragon because he's a little bit faster and you will have better battery economy
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

robboc180 said:
Hi all i currently have a P20 Pro dual sim but i am bored with the current lack of roms etc and im think of selling and getting a Note 9.
Which is the best version (Snapdragon or Exynos) looks like Exynos after a quick look in the forum?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
get the exynos because there is a wider range of roms.
( dont think the guy that replied before me realises that)
plus only the n9600 snaldragon has the ability to be rooted the n960u and 960w are useless in that regards.
the exynos n960f /ds and n960n are the prefered devices for people that enjoy root.

bober10113 said:
get the exynos because there is a wider range of roms.
( dont think the guy that replied before me realises that)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah i did see that, im looking to unlock the bootloader & root and load custom roms.

robboc180 said:
Yeah i did see that, im looking to unlock the bootloader & root and load custom roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive added more details on device models to my org. reply

EXynos works a treat! Flash happy ?

Exynos all way long!! and enjoy the real meaning of freedom

bober10113 said:
get the exynos because there is a wider range of roms.
( dont think the guy that replied before me realises that)
plus only the n9600 snaldragon has the ability to be rooted the n960u and 960w are useless in that regards.
the exynos n960f /ds and n960n are the prefered devices for people that enjoy root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I'm researching for a new phone.
I this good for rooting: Samsung Galaxy Note 9 128GB N960 Duos Blue, ARM Mali G72, Samsung Exynos 9810

melchiar said:
Hi,
I'm researching for a new phone.
I this good for rooting: Samsung Galaxy Note 9 128GB N960 Duos Blue, ARM Mali G72, Samsung Exynos 9810
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes

Have them both P20 pro & Note 9
I'm not that interested in Unlocking or installing roms on these devices .
I have the P20 Pro 6gb/128gb in use for some months now and last week i bought the Note 9 8gb/512gb Exynos.
When i compare these 2 phones they are both verry good phones i can get used to using any of these as a daily driver .
The only thing that makes me a littlebit worry is the camera .
In my opinion the P20 pro takes better shots but the Note 9 takes better video ..
For now i'l keep them both .
Here are some sample pics.
Samsung :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
P20 pro :
robboc180 said:
Hi all i currently have a P20 Pro dual sim but i am bored with the current lack of roms etc and im think of selling and getting a Note 9.
Which is the best version (Snapdragon or Exynos) looks like Exynos after a quick look in the forum?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

diquan2001 said:
I'm not that interested in Unlocking or installing roms on these devices .
I have the P20 Pro 6gb/128gb in use for some months now and last week i bought the Note 9 8gb/512gb Exynos.
When i compare these 2 phones they are both verry good phones i can get used to using any of these as a daily driver .
The only thing that makes me a littlebit worry is the camera .
In my opinion the P20 pro takes better shots but the Note 9 takes better video ..
For now i'l keep them both .
Here are some sample pics.
Samsung :
P20 pro :
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what mode was the n9 camere on?

Get the n9600. It is simply the faster phone.
The exynos may have more custom roms to choose from but since they're all based off stock, they're all pretty much the same. You really need only one rom with one dedicated developer and we have that with @Mentalmuso and WETA rom.

Airtioteclint said:
Get the n9600. It is simply the faster phone.
The exynos may have more custom roms to choose from but since they're all based off stock, they're all pretty much the same. You really need only one rom with one dedicated developer and we have that with @Mentalmuso and WETA rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes he's a great dev no doubt.
but you forgot that AOSP/gsi roms exist... they are clearly not based off of stock...

bober10113 said:
what mode was the n9 camere on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both phones were on auto mode.
Just point shoot situation.

bober10113 said:
yes he's a great dev no doubt.
but you forgot that AOSP/gsi roms exist... they are clearly not based off of stock...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't forget them. All aosp roms are pretty much the same these days too. I just upgraded from the Zuk Z2 plus and we had about 10 pie roms to choose from. All great, but you can pretty much close your eyes and choose one and be good.
As for gsi I've never used it but i understand it to be pure android? If so no thanks. Why would anybody flash that and give up all the features of the note 9? I guess that goes for aosp based roms too. It only made sense on stock boring android but never on Samsung. The loss far outweighs the gains.

Airtioteclint said:
I didn't forget them. All aosp roms are pretty much the same these days too. I just upgraded from the Zuk Z2 plus and we had about 10 pie roms to choose from. All great, but you can pretty much close your eyes and choose one and be good.
As for gsi I've never used it but i understand it to be pure android? If so no thanks. Why would anybody flash that and give up all the features of the note 9? I guess that goes for aosp based roms too. It only made sense on stock boring android but never on Samsung. The loss far outweighs the gains.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the goal of rooting always was about choice..so selecting the device that can give you the wider range of choice would make sense in my opinion....

It's also worth noting that the Exynos version has a slightly better DAC compared to Snapdragon. Good to know if you want quality sound out of it.

oddbehreif said:
It's also worth noting that the Exynos version has a slightly better DAC compared to Snapdragon. Good to know if you want quality sound out of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent point as we all use our phones for music, be it bluetooth or headphones.

robboc180 said:
Hi all i currently have a P20 Pro dual sim but i am bored with the current lack of roms etc and im think of selling and getting a Note 9.
Which is the best version (Snapdragon or Exynos) looks like Exynos after a quick look in the forum?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Firstly, the note 9 dev section is actually quite lonely - only one kernel, few ROMs and that's all. Secondly, the snapdragon variant is A LOT better vs the exynos in every regard - better battery life, faster CPU in real world, ~30% faster GPU on average, smoother UI (less frame drops), faster emulation on emulators. It's the better variant to get by far.
---------- Post added at 11:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 AM ----------
robboc180 said:
Excellent point as we all use our phones for music, be it bluetooth or headphones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not that true anymore, qualcomm really improved their own DAC in the last two generations. There are enough materials on the web about exynos 9810 - go read Andrei's articles (anandtech) how to improve exynos 9810 (part 1 and part 2). Also his article with direct comparison between the two note 9 variants in real world/real tests not antutu etc. - the snapdragon note 9 makes a joke of the exynos versions. The difference is like high tier midrange device vs the highest tier device. It's not even close and buying the midrange device just because you have two more ROMs that are the same (flashing AOSP on note is absurd as you will give up all the features, you are better of with s9, BUT even then there are compromises like camera quality/features) - is a mistake. Yes, I have the exynos note 9 and while OK, I perfectly well understand and see how mediocre the SOC is, even the sd 835 beats it in some cases and it shows in real world usage.
I am saying all that with warmth of heart towards fellow xda member that can choose between the two variants.

high_voltage said:
Firstly, the note 9 dev section is actually quite lonely - only one kernel, few ROMs and that's all. Secondly, the snapdragon variant is A LOT better vs the exynos in every regard - better battery life, faster CPU in real world, ~30% faster GPU on average, smoother UI (less frame drops), faster emulation on emulators. It's the better variant to get by far.
---------- Post added at 11:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 AM ----------
This is not that true anymore, qualcomm really improved their own DAC in the last two generations. There are enough materials on the web about exynos 9810 - go read Andrei's articles (anandtech) how to improve exynos 9810 (part 1 and part 2). Also his article with direct comparison between the two note 9 variants in real world/real tests not antutu etc. - the snapdragon note 9 makes a joke of the exynos versions. The difference is like high tier midrange device vs the highest tier device. It's not even close and buying the midrange device just because you have two more ROMs that are the same (flashing AOSP on note is absurd as you will give up all the features, you are better of with s9, BUT even then there are compromises like camera quality/features) - is a mistake. Yes, I have the exynos note 9 and while OK, I perfectly well understand and see how mediocre the SOC is, even the sd 835 beats it in some cases and it shows in real world usage.
I am saying all that with warmth of heart towards fellow xda member that can choose between the two variants.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know right. Choosing an inferior variant solely because it has more of the same rom to flash is beyond crazy. I guess it's true you can only lead a horse to water.

Why the Xperia 1 ii hasn't 4k 120 Hz recording option?

Hey everyone,
since the Xperia 5 ii is officially announced: why the Xperia 5 ii has slomo video support in 4k and the 1 ii does not?
If I read the technical details correctly, both phones have the identical 3 cameras. [emoji23]
That means for me: it's only a software thing.
Does anyone have more information about that?
Cheers
Gesendet von meinem XQ-AT51 mit Tapatalk

It's reportedly being added in a coming update.

Why is the refresh also higher on the 5 ii screen?
Starting to make the flagship model not look so good.

Rodders_28 said:
Why is the refresh also higher on the 5 ii screen?
Starting to make the flagship model not look so good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's another screen version. The Xperia 5 ii has FH+.
Gesendet von meinem XQ-AT51 mit Tapatalk

GSMarena shows it at 120Hz refresh rate screen. Read that somewhere else too, on Google news feed.

Rodders_28 said:
GSMarena shows it at 120Hz refresh rate screen. Read that somewhere else too, on Google news feed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The snapdragon 865 can't run at 120hz a 4k resolution
The 5 ii has a fhd+ and the snapdragon 865 can run at 120hz
Imho, i prefer a display with a higher dpi and resolution than a higher refresh rate, I don't spend time scrolling menu as a zombie to try to see how fluid it is :silly:

Ah ok, makes sense! Yes I like 4k and would prefer that over 120Hz

Rodders_28 said:
Ah ok, makes sense! Yes I like 4k and would prefer that over 120Hz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same. I use Sony 4k phones since 2016. [emoji28]
Gesendet von meinem XQ-AT51 mit Tapatalk

still may be possible for them to add it as the screen isnt 4k all the time, it runs below that, only when viewing 4k content it comes on, either that or they could increase the motion reduction blur to maybe 120 Hz.

Info about Pixel 5 wrong, 6.0" screen instead of 5.8"

Can someone correct the information about the Pixel 5?
It has a 6.0" screen and not a 5.8" screen.
Thanks.:good:

https://store.google.com/product/pixel_5
It says 6"
Gesendet von meinem Nokia 9 mit Tapatalk

Signor Rossi said:
https://store.google.com/product/pixel_5
It says 6"
Gesendet von meinem Nokia 9 mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I know, I only mean the main info about this threat is wrong.... maybe someone is able to change this...

nl1010 said:
Can someone correct the information about the Pixel 5?
It has a 6.0" screen and not a 5.8" screen.
Thanks.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you referring to this section:
Rumored specs: The Google Pixel 5 is a 5.8" phone with a 1080x2340p resolution display. The Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G chipset is paired with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. The main camera is 12.2+16MP and the selfie camera is 8MP. The battery has a 4080mAh capacity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If so then it states it is a 5.8" phone, not that the screen is 5.8".
If this is not what you are referring too can you give more detail as to the location of the error?

Blinkydamo said:
Are you referring to this section:
If so then it states it is a 5.8" phone, not that the screen is 5.8".
If this is not what you are referring too can you give more detail as to the location of the error?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's it. The paragraph just needs updating as the phone has been announced along with its specs.

Blinkydamo said:
Are you referring to this section:
If so then it states it is a 5.8" phone, not that the screen is 5.8".
If this is not what you are referring too can you give more detail as to the location of the error?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I reffer to this section.
The Pixel 5 is real, no rumors anymore, the screen size is 6.0" not 5.8"
Please change this , this is my only point here...