Hey everyone,
since the Xperia 5 ii is officially announced: why the Xperia 5 ii has slomo video support in 4k and the 1 ii does not?
If I read the technical details correctly, both phones have the identical 3 cameras. [emoji23]
That means for me: it's only a software thing.
Does anyone have more information about that?
Cheers
Gesendet von meinem XQ-AT51 mit Tapatalk
It's reportedly being added in a coming update.
Why is the refresh also higher on the 5 ii screen?
Starting to make the flagship model not look so good.
Rodders_28 said:
Why is the refresh also higher on the 5 ii screen?
Starting to make the flagship model not look so good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's another screen version. The Xperia 5 ii has FH+.
Gesendet von meinem XQ-AT51 mit Tapatalk
GSMarena shows it at 120Hz refresh rate screen. Read that somewhere else too, on Google news feed.
Rodders_28 said:
GSMarena shows it at 120Hz refresh rate screen. Read that somewhere else too, on Google news feed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The snapdragon 865 can't run at 120hz a 4k resolution
The 5 ii has a fhd+ and the snapdragon 865 can run at 120hz
Imho, i prefer a display with a higher dpi and resolution than a higher refresh rate, I don't spend time scrolling menu as a zombie to try to see how fluid it is :silly:
Ah ok, makes sense! Yes I like 4k and would prefer that over 120Hz
Rodders_28 said:
Ah ok, makes sense! Yes I like 4k and would prefer that over 120Hz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same. I use Sony 4k phones since 2016. [emoji28]
Gesendet von meinem XQ-AT51 mit Tapatalk
still may be possible for them to add it as the screen isnt 4k all the time, it runs below that, only when viewing 4k content it comes on, either that or they could increase the motion reduction blur to maybe 120 Hz.
Related
Install this app :
Activity launcher
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.szalkowski.activitylauncher
Then
Open the top menu
Click all activities
Scroll down to settings
There may be a few instances of settings
Expand & search for display
Scroll to display
There may be several instances of display
There will be two display instances
Enter the one that says
Com.android.settings.displaySettings
Can anyone verify they've achieved 2k?
Not work on my Mi MIx with the latest EU Rom.
Isnt 4K a hardware limitation on the mi mix?!
Nope caps at 1080p
well it did work for me but 2k? since its and HD device so, it does look more cooled do just like in the screen shots.
What? I didn't get it.
How do you know you've gotten 2k resolution?
sorry to disappoint you guys but this could be a futuristic feature of the application should Xiaomi release a 2 version !!
looks good do
ROIDjoy said:
sorry to disappoint you guys but this could be a futuristic feature of the application should Xiaomi release a 2 version !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you compare the screen shot it does look like the black looks more black which it does. and 2k? right.
My dear if Xiaomi manufactured this device with a 2k screen they would have announced that as a marketing strength. To be sure just open youtube and find a 2k clip and try to switch the 2k option and see what happens and let us know the results.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
ROIDjoy said:
My dear if Xiaomi manufactured this device with a 2k screen they would have announced that as a marketing strength. To be sure just open youtube and find a 2k clip and try to switch the 2k option and see what happens and let us know the results.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, you still here ROID? can't let the Mix go?
what is interesting is if it changes the rendering resolution, because there's this thing called super sampling. what it does is it creates frames in highers resolution and then outputs them to the screen creating a slightly sharper, higher quality image. For example, even if you have a FHD computer screen, it's better to watch 2k or even 4k videos, for better quality.
jaime4272 said:
if you compare the screen shot it does look like the black looks more black which it does. and 2k? right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never clicked the 2k option.
The two screen shots are both in native resolution.
I posted two screen shots as a way of showing how to find what I'm talking about.
I'm not sure why the second is darker.
Good question?
Just try a 2k clip and if you can see 2k as an option to play the vedio then it works
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
before putting on the market it was written that my Note 8 will record 4K video and 60 FPS. hell where we got it?
bassgenerator said:
before putting on the market it was written that my Note 8 will record 4K video and 60 FPS. hell where we got it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where?
Here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sityware.camera_mod_samsung_n8_bitrate_settings
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk
Logel said:
Here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sityware.camera_mod_samsung_n8_bitrate_settings
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man to wake up. I'm not going to root to lose the warranty.
Logel said:
Here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sityware.camera_mod_samsung_n8_bitrate_settings
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's nothing to do with Samsung. Its an app developed by an independent app developper.
During the unveilling of the Note 8, they only claimed 4k at 30fps
Praks93 said:
That's nothing to do with Samsung. Its an app developed by an independent app developper.
During the unveilling of the Note 8, they only claimed 4k at 30fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
claimed 60 FPS.
pleas translate you.
https://www.mojandroid.sk/samsung-galaxy-note-8-4k-60-fps/
bassgenerator said:
claimed 60 FPS.
pleas translate you.
https://www.mojandroid.sk/samsung-galaxy-note-8-4k-60-fps/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea what independent sites reported but do check the video of the unveilling. It was NEVER claimed that the Note 8 will do 4k at 60. The site you linked must have a typo.
Praks93 said:
I have no idea what independent sites reported but do check the video of the unveilling. It was NEVER claimed that the Note 8 will do 4k at 60. The site you linked must have a typo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct
Gesendet von meinem SM-N950F mit Tapatalk
Praks93 said:
I have no idea what independent sites reported but do check the video of the unveilling. It was NEVER claimed that the Note 8 will do 4k at 60. The site you linked must have a typo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suspect the confusion has arisen from tech sites quoting the capabilities of Exynos 8895 vs Snapdragon 835.
The processors maybe capable of 4K @ 60, but thats not to say it has been enabled in the phone its been put into. Samsung have their reasons for not unleashing its full power. Would love to know what they are.
Samsung is working in high-level fools who are subject to US influence as it is from all of them and Europe is just paying for it
bassgenerator said:
Samsung is working in high-level fools who are subject to US influence as it is from all of them and Europe is just paying for it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jooniloh said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nothing personal my brother. but it's strange to me. Samsung's rivalry is built on the head
bassgenerator said:
nothing personal my brother. but it's strange to me. Samsung's rivalry is built on the head
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but they never deceived anyone... Lol. They said it was possibly capable of it. In the reveal they said it would be 4k @ 30fps
Hints:
http://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/galaxy-note8/specs/
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note8-8505.php
Both sites (and many more) list it as 4K @ 30fps.
EDIT: And about that "US Influence" thing, I don't know why we would influence 'our own products' as well, if anything we'd also like that feature. They have their reasons.
SD835 does not support the video allegedly shoot 60 fps. but the Exynos Yes. so because of this Samsung disable overall. This is my opinion but I could be wrong. We are far advanced in technology but this one I consider to be someone. because the camera can do that but the Samsung yet to limit us? a big mistake. Cheers.
bassgenerator said:
SD835 does not support the video allegedly shoot 60 fps. but the Exynos Yes. so because of this Samsung disable overall. This is my opinion but I could be wrong. We are far advanced in technology but this one I consider to be someone. because the camera can do that but the Samsung yet to limit us? a big mistake. Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's your opinion, you're not sure but you run with it as of its a fact? I'm confused.
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk
bassgenerator said:
man to wake up. I'm not going to root to lose the warranty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please remove yourself from XDA
meboy said:
Please remove yourself from XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you first ...)
bassgenerator said:
Samsung is working in high-level fools who are subject to US influence as it is from all of them and Europe is just paying for it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That just doesn't make sense.
Samsung didn't deceive you. Whatever you took as the word of God regarding the camera specs lied.
meboy said:
Please remove yourself from XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not everyone on XDA is all about rooting and roms. Some of us LIKE to use things like Android Pay and other apps that require Safetynet to function. This thread is about shooting video at a certain rate. sheesh.
I got the p30 pro couple of days ago. So far nothing much to complain as i've used the mate 20 pro as well so there's not much of a difference in the UI and stuff.
One thing i noticed though, i thought the p30 pro was able to see in pure darkness from all the reviews and **** on youtube but that doesn't seem to be the case though. Not sure if it's a problem with my unit or the same for the rest. Also worth noting that im on the 9.1.0.124 firmware. I guess that's the latest
Would appreciate it if anyone else can share their input on this. Attaching snapshots below. Thanks.
JJay666 said:
I got the p30 pro couple of days ago. So far nothing much to complain as i've used the mate 20 pro as well so there's not much of a difference in the UI and stuff.
One thing i noticed though, i thought the p30 pro was able to see in pure darkness from all the reviews and **** on youtube but that doesn't seem to be the case though. Not sure if it's a problem with my unit or the same for the rest. Also worth noting that im on the 9.1.0.124 firmware. I guess that's the latest
Would appreciate it if anyone else can share their input on this. Attaching snapshots below. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It can’t be pitch black. You must have some kind of light source but it does not need much to make its magic. I tested and could barley see anything in my bedroom. The iPhone gave me a black picture and the P30 Pro took a picture like it was daylight
Mine also doesnt capture anything in the dark.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
It works on night room you not setting night mod this is good with light, setting normal pictures with AI and working
Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk
easycure1974 said:
It can’t be pitch black. You must have some kind of light source but it does not need much to make its magic. I tested and could barley see anything in my bedroom. The iPhone gave me a black picture and the P30 Pro took a picture like it was daylight
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got it. Thought it could capture in pure darkness :highfive:
JJay666 said:
Got it. Thought it could capture in pure darkness :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It almost can, but you need a liiiiitle bit of light which it can when utilize to make the picture. Pitch black needs infrared, really.
---------- Post added at 09:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:57 AM ----------
JJay666 said:
Got it. Thought it could capture in pure darkness :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It almost can, but you need a liiiiitle bit of light which it can when utilize to make the picture. Pitch black needs infrared, really.
Little Video from mine
https://youtu.be/4MIJJCCgAF0
Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk
Which camera did you use? Its most effective with the main camera, in direct comparison the ultrawide just got me a black image and the main got me a slightly dark image but with everything visible.
salva111549 said:
Little Video from mine
https://youtu.be/4MIJJCCgAF0
Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks good, were there any lighting behind or something ?
nurps said:
Which camera did you use? Its most effective with the main camera, in direct comparison the ultrawide just got me a black image and the main got me a slightly dark image but with everything visible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah the main cam in night mode option. But it was pitch darkness though. No light source.
Very very little light Bro you can see on my Video
Gesendet von meinem ZTE A2017G mit Tapatalk
Can anyone infer an answer based on previous Sony phones? I never owned one. It seems the only flaw this has is the refresh rate and lack of IR blaster, which I can stand
It shouldn't be possible, since the gpu of the snapdragon is too slow to handle more than 60hz at 4K
I see that some previous sony can do 120hz at 1080p. Can we expect the same here?
I have read a Japanese review that the screen works at 90hz and that it shows compared to the Xperia 1
Enviado desde mi J9110 mediante Tapatalk
You can get 90hz on your Xperia 1 if you search and write a bit of code, at 4k.
fastbooking said:
You can get 90hz on your Xperia 1 if you search and write a bit of code, at 4k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does this require root? I would guess so right?
Last option
Similar to 90Hz
Alaa | Google Android said:
Last option
Similar to 90Hz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reviews so far don't agree it's like 90hz and they couldn't tell the difference when toggled off and on so sounds like a gimmick.
Maybe it'll improve when final release software is released but I doubt it.
Mackay53 said:
The reviews so far don't agree it's like 90hz and they couldn't tell the difference when toggled off and on so sounds like a gimmick.
Maybe it'll improve when final release software is released but I doubt it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean if it's not 90hz it is just not.
Andrew Lin said:
Can anyone infer an answer based on previous Sony phones? I never owned one. It seems the only flaw this has is the refresh rate and lack of IR blaster, which I can stand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really wish it had the IR blaster too, so much fun turning off TVs on terrasses during the world cup in summer
Any update on this?
cob92 said:
It shouldn't be possible, since the gpu of the snapdragon is too slow to handle more than 60hz at 4K
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Andrew Lin said:
Any update on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the chipset can't support it, it's a dead end.
A while back someone was claiming to have overclocked the Note 10+ to 90hz. It was hogwash because the chipset hardware not the just the firmware doesn't support it.
The answer is in the chipset white papers and even if it does support it, the circuit design may not.
Can someone correct the information about the Pixel 5?
It has a 6.0" screen and not a 5.8" screen.
Thanks.:good:
https://store.google.com/product/pixel_5
It says 6"
Gesendet von meinem Nokia 9 mit Tapatalk
Signor Rossi said:
https://store.google.com/product/pixel_5
It says 6"
Gesendet von meinem Nokia 9 mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I know, I only mean the main info about this threat is wrong.... maybe someone is able to change this...
nl1010 said:
Can someone correct the information about the Pixel 5?
It has a 6.0" screen and not a 5.8" screen.
Thanks.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you referring to this section:
Rumored specs: The Google Pixel 5 is a 5.8" phone with a 1080x2340p resolution display. The Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G chipset is paired with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. The main camera is 12.2+16MP and the selfie camera is 8MP. The battery has a 4080mAh capacity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If so then it states it is a 5.8" phone, not that the screen is 5.8".
If this is not what you are referring too can you give more detail as to the location of the error?
Blinkydamo said:
Are you referring to this section:
If so then it states it is a 5.8" phone, not that the screen is 5.8".
If this is not what you are referring too can you give more detail as to the location of the error?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's it. The paragraph just needs updating as the phone has been announced along with its specs.
Blinkydamo said:
Are you referring to this section:
If so then it states it is a 5.8" phone, not that the screen is 5.8".
If this is not what you are referring too can you give more detail as to the location of the error?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I reffer to this section.
The Pixel 5 is real, no rumors anymore, the screen size is 6.0" not 5.8"
Please change this , this is my only point here...