Play Store woes - I'm surprised by how worse it got - App Stores

I've been developing for Android for years now since the early "eclipse" day and my beloved HTC G1.
Originally Android was truely opened with AOSP and the Play Store (which didn't even have this name yet) was almost as open as the naive old Android API.
With the years Google also tightened their restrictions and "reviewing" like Apple.
My last app is a plain metronome. It's open-source, it's free, it uses no complex APIs or obtrusive permissions.
The major thing for me was for it to be cross-platform as possible so you can "walk" with your sounds anywhere.
I do it in my spare time and finally got enough fixes to push a build.
Usually I first push to app stores before providing the other binaries as I really like the commits of a build to be on par as much as possible.
So... I've pushed a build to Apple's AppStore and the Play Store.
Within less than 24hrs it was approved by Apple.
On Google Play... this is the 4th day I'm waiting.
While from a plain developer point of view, all those restrictions aren't my cup of tea.
I must say that those days I don't find Google's approach any better than Apple's. I'd might say overall, while dashboards are nicer, the process itself became much less appealing for releasing a legitimate Android app on the "major" Google Play Store. (I do know there are alternatives and I do offer plain .apk)
Is anyone else feel the experience is worse (even if you've had a longstanding developer account)?

I have my Play developer account since over 10 years, published some small apps and one bigger thing.
A small app I submitted about 2 months ago was approved after 1 to 2 days without a problem. Updates were also approved fast.
However, an app I submitted this week was rejected after 3 days because of a ludicrous policy issue. After resubmitting, in the Play console "Release overview" page it is shown "In review" again, but the dashboard says "Ready to send for review".
Tried to contact Google because of that this weekend, but the "Call" option is not available on weekends, and for "Chat" it always says "Try again later, all agents are busy" even though the hours of operation are shown as 24/7.
Here people are complaining review times of over 14 days recently:
https://www.reddit.com/r/androiddev/comments/sb7hxb
We can only hope Google will learn and it gets better again soon.

my release eventually took 14days to be reviewed and published.
Basic policy updates took 10-12 days to be approved.

Just wanted to report that my recent experience with Google Play is very good. Updates are consistently approved in about 1/2 - 1 hours.

Related

Google Nexus 5 software updates vs. iPhone update speed

iOS 7 was released on September 18, 2013.
7.0.1 came out September 19.
7.0.2 came out September 26.
7.0.3 came out October 22.
7.0.4 came out November 14.
That's 4 updates in 2 months. Three in the (approximately) first month.
KitKat came out October 31. No updates so far, over a month in.
I understand that you might respond, "well iOS needs so many updates because it has so many bugs." And that might be true. But unquestionably, KitKat has some things that could be adjusted (at a minimum, it'd be nice if they tweaked the volume a little bit on the N5). And surely there are various bugs that could be fixed.
Is this pretty typical? I can't help but wonder why Google takes so long to push out updates, even if they are minor. I'd rather get a couple of minor updates over the course of a month or two than to have to wait 3 or 4 months for a single, bigger update.
A couple of those updates were for security issues that HAD to be updated quickly, considering the bad press they were getting.
speedyink said:
A couple of those updates were for security issues that HAD to be updated quickly, considering the bad press they were getting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^Sums it up, it'd be a big deal if they were major updates like 7.1.x etc. but like @speedyink said they were just security patches
phositadc said:
I'd rather get a couple of minor updates over the course of a month or two than to have to wait 3 or 4 months for a single, bigger update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't always get what we want.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
phositadc said:
iOS 7 was released on September 18, 2013.
7.0.1 came out September 19.
7.0.2 came out September 26.
7.0.3 came out October 22.
7.0.4 came out November 14.
That's 4 updates in 2 months. Three in the (approximately) first month.
KitKat came out October 31. No updates so far, over a month in.
I understand that you might respond, "well iOS needs so many updates because it has so many bugs." And that might be true. But unquestionably, KitKat has some things that could be adjusted (at a minimum, it'd be nice if they tweaked the volume a little bit on the N5). And surely there are various bugs that could be fixed.
Is this pretty typical? I can't help but wonder why Google takes so long to push out updates, even if they are minor. I'd rather get a couple of minor updates over the course of a month or two than to have to wait 3 or 4 months for a single, bigger update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont get these android vs ios threads. if your unhappy, go back to ios then. you dont need to keep looking for reasons.
Google does it this way because it works for them, i honestly dont see a problem with it. whatever bugs that are on stock are usually fixed on a custom rom. Try doing that with an iphone
TheAtheistOtaku said:
Whatever bugs that are on stock are usually fixed on a custom rom. Try doing that with an iphone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to hate on custom roms, but most of them have their own bugs and are not for the everyday user. Some might say the N5 is developer phone but it works on Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile and I know Sprint is selling it on contract to average users.
The main issue with the N5 is obviously the camera. I can't even use some apps anymore and the camera breaks to a green screen while using those apps. I know the fix is coming, but it's kinda annoying to have to reboot my phone every 30 minutes to be able to send snapchats or use the camera again. Also hearing so many stories about people returning an otherwise great phone because they cant get the camera to work. So I guess I semi-agree with the OP that Google needs to fix some things now, but can also understand why they haven't yet.
TheAtheistOtaku said:
if your unhappy, go back to ios then. you dont need to keep looking for reasons.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think all he was trying to say was that he wished Google was a tiny tiny little bit like Apple sometimes. If this was the IPhone 5 they would be getting murdered by the media. Not necessarily unhappy with the phone or Google's services, just patiently waiting for a fix on a few crucial things.
Updates will come when they're ready. I know I don't want an update for the sake of getting a update. Too many times I've seen stuff rushed to fix something and break many other things.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
adio01 said:
Not trying to hate on custom roms, but most of them have their own bugs and are not for the everyday user. Some might say the N5 is developer phone but it works on Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile and I know Sprint is selling it on contract to average users.
The main issue with the N5 is obviously the camera. I can't even use some apps anymore and the camera breaks to a green screen while using those apps. I know the fix is coming, but it's kinda annoying to have to reboot my phone every 30 minutes to be able to send snapchats or use the camera again. Also hearing so many stories about people returning an otherwise great phone because they cant get the camera to work. So I guess I semi-agree with the OP that Google needs to fix some things now, but can also understand why they haven't yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro, that's an example of something you don't say here at XDA. "Most of them have their own bugs" well duh! It's been about a month and ROMs take a few months to iron out all the issues. But when that stable or RC CM/AOKP/Beanstalk/Slim build comes out, there's no complaining. Simply good features and good speed. :victory:
Why shouldn't Google market it as a good smartphone for the average user? Just because it's a Nexus doesn't mean its destiny belongs at XDA...it's got good speed, stability, features and screen. What else could you wish for at the price of $349/399 or $450 on carrier?
It's not like iOS 7 was good upon release. You wanna see the lag on my iPad Mini that wasn't fixed until 7.0.3? Bro, there's no reason that they should be releasing anything that lags that hard on a major device that still constituted a major part of their lineup at ios7 release; simply unacceptable. The updates were methods of solving problems such as lag (it's much better now with Reduce Motion and Increase Contrast).
You're an XDA user man. Look around for a fix, don't just sit there. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2516061
---------- Post added at 08:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:48 PM ----------
phositadc said:
I understand that you might respond, "well iOS needs so many updates because it has so many bugs." And that might be true. But unquestionably, KitKat has some things that could be adjusted (at a minimum, it'd be nice if they tweaked the volume a little bit on the N5). And surely there are various bugs that could be fixed.
Is this pretty typical? I can't help but wonder why Google takes so long to push out updates, even if they are minor. I'd rather get a couple of minor updates over the course of a month or two than to have to wait 3 or 4 months for a single, bigger update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A software update won't magically melt the extra glue in your N5. It was already determined that speaker sound required a hardware modification. There is a fix for volume on the N5 already, I think Google is aware of this and might put it in 4.4.1.
droid_<3er said:
Bro, that's an example of something you don't say here at XDA. "Most of them have their own bugs" well duh! It's been about a month and ROMs take a few months to iron out all the issues. But when that stable or RC CM/AOKP/Beanstalk/Slim build comes out, there's no complaining. Simply good features and good speed. :victory:
Why shouldn't Google market it as a good smartphone for the average user? Just because it's a Nexus doesn't mean its destiny belongs at XDA...it's got good speed, stability, features and screen. What else could you wish for at the price of $349/399 or $450 on carrier?
It's not like iOS 7 was good upon release. You wanna see the lag on my iPad Mini that wasn't fixed until 7.0.3? Bro, there's no reason that they should be releasing anything that lags that hard on a major device that still constituted a major part of their lineup at ios7 release; simply unacceptable. The updates were methods of solving problems such as lag (it's much better now with Reduce Motion and Increase Contrast).
You're an XDA user man. Look around for a fix, don't just sit there. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2516061
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) I didn't say custom roms don't get the bugs iron out i've been rooting/flashing for 4-5 years now and have used some amazing roms. I said they were not for the everyday user and if you don't know what you are doing it can be a hassle.
2) A lot of people argue that the Nexus 5 is a developer phone. I didn't say it was destined for XDA I almost said the exact opposite since average users are buying it.
3) Never said IOS 7 was good/bad nor have I ever used IOS. In your comparison though, lag vs. the entire camera not functioning.
4) I know how to search im just more of a lurker... and I've used that camera app before. The problem is not the quality of the image/camera and that is what that app is aiming to fix. I actually think the N5 is able to take great pictures in most situations. The problem with the camera is that while using apps that utilize the nexus's camera it will become unusable giving you a black/green screen with noise making the camera unusable until you reboot the phone.
I know the camera issue does not affect many users who do not use apps like snap-chat and a few others (or I think using face-unlock will also trigger this) but a lot of less tech savvy have been returning the phone thinking it doesn't function properly. For tech savvy users like us we know the new camera API is coming and can wait it out.
Also, they are exclusively featuring camera on the N5 in all of the commercials I have seen.
Funny story to go with this also. My GF suggested that I need to get a new phone since snap-chat doesn't work anymore... I just sort of laughed and said no way! But just thought it was an interesting perspective.
So who are these people returning their nexus 5 because of the camera? Are they in the n5 v g2 thread?
Sent from my Nexus 5
I'm going to stop reading the general forum, all i see is people whining about this or that.
If you're not satisfied just return your device and get anything else.
To get back on topic, most of us don't give a flying F* about iOS around here
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
All you are saying in the op is that Apple release sh1t software that needs fixing more than Google
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
The nexus series is geared towards development end of story
I use snap chat every day many times a day and I do not have this green problem you speak of
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Shoopz said:
I use snap chat every day many times a day and I do not have this green problem you speak of
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually get that issue quite often. Occasionally its just a black screen and gives a camera error. Doesn't fix itself until the phones restarted. Stock / Rooted.
There are FAR more iOS 7 users than there are Android 4.4 users. When 400 million iOS 7 users have an issue—92% of all iOS users out there—a lot of people are affected. When 1 million Android 4.4 users have an issue—1% of all Android users out there—this is a very tiny portion of the Android ecosystem and Google does not feel they need to resolve issues timely. You can blame Google and the entire Android ecosystem for this.
rayiskon said:
I'm going to stop reading the general forum, all i see is people whining about this or that.
If you're not satisfied just return your device and get anything else.
To get back on topic, most of us don't give a flying F* about iOS around here
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not whining and I didn't say that i'm unhappy with the device or want to return it if that was directed towards me, just saying Google needs to fix a few things.
Advertising the Camera -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ0XTJqFLIE
Camera Problems -
http://www.reddit.com/r/Nexus5/comments/1rcc1f/issue_with_camera_crashing_on_nexus_5_running/
Camera Problems Confirmed -
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=61873#c79
And like I said the issue has been confirmed most of us are just waiting on them to rollout the update.
Shoopz said:
I use snap chat every day many times a day and I do not have this green problem you speak of
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What rom do you have flashed?
They need to get an update for the n5 quick, to fix the 'bog roll' quality speaker which somehow manages to vibrate the phone more than the actual vibrator does.
There is a 4.4.1 update rolling out shortly. No link, but easily googled.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
It should probably be mentioned that Google have decoupled several apps from the core OS that in iOS would require an OS "update".
For example, Chrome is now a separate update whereas Safari in iOS is not. If security updates to the browser are required, Google just updates Chrome in the Play store, whereas Apple would release an OS "update" which may in reality only affect the browser.
I'm not saying that is always going to be the case, but it may explain some of the timing "differences".
EDIT: Here's a good example, from the iOS 7.0.4 update:
Bug fixes and improvements, including a fix for an issue that causes FaceTime calls to fail for some users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Android equivalent of a Facetime fix would likely just be a new version of Hangouts on Play.
Regards,
Dave

Pre-Introduction Thoughts on Play v. Apple App Store

We've been working on iOS and Android prototypes of a gaming app that will let users enter and play competitively for prizes.
Now we are set to code. So nights and weekends we will be coding for a few months.
Apple App Store (AAS) has more high rollers that spend more. But Apple takes too long to certify each version. I expect that we will be releasing a new version every month for at least 6 or 8 months. Someone explained how to test iOS prerleases outside of the AAS but I don't understand. If we take the iOS route I'll use UTEST for betas. That means $.
I don't see any SEO advantages to AAS. And likewise no advantage to AAS for app discovery, in fact Play's search capability is more robust.
Play looks a better choice but we would need to limit our coverage to Android 4.0 and above. So we will lose part of the Android advantage of the large number of devices. There are about 1 Billion Android devices now but less than half are 4.0 and higher. So the number of iOS and Android 4+ devices out there are the same and iOS users spend about 3 - 4X more than Android users.
Android Studio Console is better and has better metrics. I can tell if someone uninstalls the app which is good feedback, especially if we decide to pay for downlaods.
I'd like to internationalize the app asap but I'm not sure which AAP or Play is better for international downloads. A few languages would avail us to most of the European and South American markets.
I wish I knew how many users are registered with credit cards or other forms of payment on the the AAP vs. Apple claims about 500 million registrations on AAS and Google I think is about the same.
The big bet is on Android's continued growth shipping another 500 million throughout the year with apple shiping less than 250 million. If Apple comes out with a $400 phone though it could change all this.
Leaning towards Play and a first Android App because of the quick access to Google Play without a long certification process.and if I trust what I've been told it is easier to get a beta into users hands to get feedback before putting an updated release on Play.
Please feel free to jump in and share your experiences with both.

How is the battery life on nougat

Hello
As the title says i didn't upgrade my t713 yet to nougat, so i was wondering how is the battery life after the update , I'm getting around 6 hours of sot on mm , does the nougat battery life is any better ?
I haven't done any formal testing, but subjectively seems slightly better with 7. Streaming Netflix seems to use about 8-10% per hour. That's with power saving on and brightness set around 25-30%
The answers you will receive to your question are highly subjectively. It all depends on the brightness of the screen and the tasks running.
That being said, I've a T713 too running 6.0.1 and I had +10 hours SOT.
Not very good IMO. There's some battery leak with Bluetooth. I got 5 hours SOT.
Niii4 said:
The answers you will receive to your question are highly subjectively. It all depends on the brightness of the screen and the tasks running.
That being said, I've a T713 too running 6.0.1 and I had +10 hours SOT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but sometimes the battery goes shorter or longer after applying an update due to the new structure of the new build so it's not only about how you use it.
My battery life on the T715 isn't as good as M. I'd say M is a good 30% better. Seems also to be the case on my OnePlus 3. :crying:
In general, OS updates are bad. They eat away storage and often come with more spyware.
Niii4 said:
In general, OS updates are bad. They eat away storage and often come with more spyware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must agree, it's why i usually leave my devices not updated..
messi2050 said:
I must agree, it's why i usually leave my devices not updated..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simply "not updating", without also taking other security measures, isn't a wise move. Android is a large enough target for malware writers now that you can't assume you are safe.
However, on the flip side, there comes a point when a new OS version requires more juice than your device can reliably offer. This is why I am always amused by Apple fans who brag about how long their devices are supported. Sure, they get updates, but there will come a day when an update will sandbag the crap out of your device (and unlike Android, there is a zero percent chance of reverting it unless you realize your mistake before Apple cuts off signing of the previous version) The reality is that Apple realistically supports devices for about 3 years, compared with the 1-2 years of Android manufacturers if you factor in the performance losses.
I'm keeping my tab on MM for now, because battery life is already somewhat of an issue as it is, but I have a firewall in place and I vet all apps that go onto it carefully. Sideloading is disabled.
' "not updating", without also taking other security measures..'
It is very simple, if you don't install anything from *dubious sources*, remember: all free things come with a price!, you should be quite secured.
I highly disdain the spoiled mentally of Android users that are not willing to pay for software but totally expect to be entitled to get all for nothing.
Android paid software is drop-dead cheap in comparison with other platforms. Therefore I must assume that mostly pampered uneducated kiddies complain about paid software.
Android is as good a target as Windows. Thus just stay away from the pirated software unless you genuinely seek trojans, viruses and randsomware.
And no, virus scanners CANNOT just find everything. Period.
Peace.
Niii4 said:
' "not updating", without also taking other security measures..'
It is very simple, if you don't install anything from *dubious sources*, remember: all free things come with a price!, you should be quite secured.
I highly disdain the spoiled mentally of Android users that are not willing to pay for software but totally expect to be entitled to get all for nothing.
Android paid software is drop-dead cheap in comparison with other platforms. Therefore I must assume that mostly pampered uneducated kiddies complain about paid software.
Android is as good a target as Windows. Thus just stay away from the pirated software unless you genuinely seek trojans, viruses and randsomware.
And no, virus scanners CANNOT just find everything. Period.
Peace.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A tad judgmental without the facts, are we?
I do pay for software on my devices. In fact, I have quite a bit of real money invested in Android apps. Other than NetGuard (which I did buy a full license for, but which offers additional features in the Github version), all of my apps came from the Play store.
However, not all apps have a premium version, as they prefer the ad income. Which would be fine, except that not all ad servers are safe anymore. Anyone with a valid credit card can buy ads these days. It's the same issue as on PCs, where a website will load uncontrolled code from an ad server outside its control.
Now, apps that do things other than what they purport are, by definition, dodgy and should be avoided, but there have been quite a few seemingly legit apps on the Play store lately that have later been found to behave like malware. Default denying them network access until you can determine what kind of app they are feels like common sense.
The days where you could operate safely by just avoiding pirated or dodgy apps are gone, while those are still good things to do. Thus, putting apps behind a firewall isn't necessarily about getting something for nothing. It just means that only apps that get their ads through Google's networks can deliver ads.
jshamlet, good to hear that you are NOT one of those freeloaders.
I use Netguard myself. Best firewall on the market. Only downside: it needs the VPN. Thus it's either Netguard and your gov spies on your every move or VPN and no firewall.
Ads have become epidemic on Android. I try to steer clear of apps with ads. I'd rather pay PC software prices than "free" + ads and spyware.

OnePlus monthly updates and security patches.

I dont know whats wrong with oneplus with the monthly updates and security patches, but that was the most importat thing that i wanted on my new phone and i switched from samsung note 9. Generally im happy with the performance but without the updates i noticed that the battery life and a little lag comes after a while.
peace
Their is no monthly updates only Bi-Monthly (2 Months) but they're lacking a bit..
admirberisha99 said:
I dont know whats wrong with oneplus with the monthly updates and security patches, but that was the most importat thing that i wanted on my new phone and i switched from samsung note 9. Generally im happy with the performance but without the updates i noticed that the battery life and a little lag comes after a while.
peace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beta gets them monthly... Dunno what you're talking about but they're one of the few that provides monthly security updates.
M3drvr said:
Beta gets them monthly... Dunno what you're talking about but they're one of the few that provides monthly security updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the 6t im still on the January security patch.
1+ suckered you and me into purchasing this phone..
Its a good phone let down by software implementations for worldwide audfences not just India!
Hardware wise the only issues are the camera software(The grainy blurry images when zoomed in are unfortunate)
Why no true AOD.
1+ fanboys feel free to take a step back, digest, then provide a non fanboy response........
touche at the ready.........
.
admirberisha99 said:
On the 6t im still on the January security patch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure why
Because your on the beta... Obviously...
They have the option with the beta but the beta can introduce bugs down the road.
misfitpierce said:
Because your on the beta... Obviously...
They have the option with the beta but the beta can introduce bugs down the road.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope im in the latest stable OS. https://www.oneplus.com/de/support/softwareupgrade/details?code=9 this one
misfitpierce said:
Because your on the beta... Obviously...
They have the option with the beta but the beta can introduce bugs down the road.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And like I initially said, if you read, on beta...
I'm not entirely sure why people are bent out of shape over not getting monthly updates. I guess I'm missing something. For me the updates come when they come, and in the meantime I just use the device and never think about what security patch it's on.
But that's me.
Its says open beta 7 on your first screen ! (Please give a cookie to this guy)
Latest stable(9.0.12) is on janury security patch, stop drug man you are already on the latest beta, that's why you have more telemetry, more battery drain, less stability but you are on latest security patch... (omegalul)
PS : Stop to play with your phone If you do not know what you're doing with.
Omagad, poor xda...
LyDr0x said:
Its says open beta 7 on your first screen ! (Please give a cookie to this guy)
Latest stable(9.0.12) is on janury security patch, stop drug man you are already on the latest beta, that's why you have more telemetry, more battery drain, less stability but you are on latest security patch... (omegalul)
PS : Stop to play with your phone If you do not know what you're doing with.
Omagad, poor xda...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well original poster never said he was on stable. So that's why I said, if you want latest and are concerned, beta gives it. If you don't want to do that, stop complaining Imo. OnePlus still does better than majority of companies
M3drvr said:
Well original poster never said he was on stable. So that's why I said, if you want latest and are concerned, beta gives it. If you don't want to do that, stop complaining Imo. OnePlus still does better than majority of companies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?
Im talking about you (and your screenshot when you say not sure why) and not the original poster.
Beta gives it definitly with more telemetry, more battery drain and less stability, it's paradoxal for a homogeneous ROMs focused on security.
Actually, I bought all the smartphones of the brand and Oneplus are funny about the speed of deployment of security patches.
Essential, Nokia and Google are 15x faster to deploy an update on their terminals, it's not just a fanboy response, we're in the factual there.
So yes clearly Oneplus is at the top of the table and I never say otherwise however it is just correct for the deployment of updates, i'm sorry for Oneplus but how many smartphones to manage ?
Essential, Nokia and Google are more responsive, end of the story.
Did everyone forget that the entire staff took a few weeks off for religious holiday. The pipeline of updates doesn't just start dripping out the other end instantly.
LyDr0x said:
?
Im talking about you (and your screenshot when you say not sure why) and not the original poster.
Beta gives it definitly with more telemetry, more battery drain and less stability, it's paradoxal for a homogeneous ROMs focused on security.
Actually, I bought all the smartphones of the brand and Oneplus are funny about the speed of deployment of security patches.
Essential, Nokia and Google are 15x faster to deploy an update on their terminals, it's not just a fanboy response, we're in the factual there.
So yes clearly Oneplus is at the top of the table and I never say otherwise however it is just correct for the deployment of updates, i'm sorry for Oneplus but how many smartphones to manage ?
Essential, Nokia and Google are more responsive, end of the story.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never noticed any difference in stability or anything going stable to beta. Maybe you do, but I do not and have only had better results running beta VS stable. I have no extra telemetry VS stable so cut the crap with That please and thank it.
OnePlus providing updates for a lot longer these days than even Google is supplying for there phones. OnePlus 3,still getting pie and its 3 years old coming up. That's far longer than Google gives updates. Essential has one phone to take care so come on,don't go there,that's not fair to compare to, unless you know of more than one phone that essential builds that no one else seems to have purchased.... Google to OnePlus is similar in asking of devices to support especially considering size of Google as a whole.
I think it's very easy to criticize OnePlus when they're supporting MULTIPLE devices as much as they are. Look at companies like Samsung, LG, Google, Motorola, and others. Their update cycles are slower, less frequent, and don't last as long in the long-term. Yes, OnePlus has always been known as an enthusiast brand and was for us who like to tinker with their phones. But they're a company who need to make a profit, and they've really had to restructure as they grow to keep up with demand. They also release phones every 6 months, and I'm sure they've had to spend enormous resources to design the 7, while still supporting devices like the 3. No company is perfect, but they're far superior, in my eyes, at maintaining devices that can compete with other manufacturers, while also having to follow guidelines of other companies like T-Mobile and Google who require them to follow their rules in order to stay in business. As someone who works in Telecom, I see more issues from other companies than OnePlus. While it's important to voice our concerns on forums and towards the company, I think they deserve some credit for not venturing too far from their roots, despite their evolution as a company.
I agree that no company is perfect. But, monthly updates, at least for security patches are very important nowadays, especially since the exploits that are patched on the security fixes become known and thus leave people vulnerable.
For those complaining, you guys DO realize that we're on the better side of things when it comes to updates, right... ? Lmao
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
The really sad part is if OnePlus did give monthly updates (or any manufacturer), these same people would be complaining that there are no new features, or nothing was updated just the security. Me, me, me, give, give, give, want, want, want. There was a time when XDA was fun, you learned things and there was always new development and it has changed over the years for various reasons. I have backed off because of all the *****ing and complaining. It's just a phone guys, nothing else, it's a hobby for me and nothing else. Can we stop with all the complaining?
I read through this thread and nearly couldnt help but laugh, People complaining because OP doesnt give them a snappy security patch, which is all in crazy anyhow.. I mean.. you act like some hacker is going to hack into your device and take your stuff within the next 5 mins or so...... I used to be a ONEPLUS hater, Then After LG and Company screwed me over, then my Carrier started selling the OP, I decided why not, lets give
it a try, and I must say I been very satisfied with it so far, everyone complaining, I wonder what you did on your old devices that didnt get patches but maybe a few times a year..
I dont get it. I personally think OP has gone above and beyond what nearly any other OEM would do. and your still not happy....... I hear more complaints about the OP then I do any other OEM,
and OP gives you a hell of alot more then any other OEM would do. you get a Flagship device for half of the price any other OEM flagship device would cost, and you still complain, not to mention you complain because
hardware isnt 100% perfect, The reason they can give you the device for half the cost of all other OEM flagship devices, because they learned to retard on some things, If you want a perfect 100% everything, and all hardware top shape, then get another device with all that and pay $1,200.00 + for it...........
Sorry just adding my 2 cents..........
This is the main reason I kinda stopped using XDA too.... Half the time it feels like Romper Room in here.

Why no detailed reviews on the phone or camera?! It was announced a week ago!o

Why are there no detailed reviews yet or camera reviews yet?! Usually Google allows reviewers with early access to publish.
I wonder if it's bad news...? It's already been a week.
It's not released until Thursday - and later in the US, which is still the headline market. There are clearly two embargos, one on unboxings and 'first thoughts', which already passed over the weekend, and a second on full reviews including things like camera samples/comparisons, which is still in effect until (at least) sometime later this week.
We know that many YouTubers have the phone(s) at this point, and it's not unreasonable to guess that the big boys (Verge, MKBHD, etc.) have already had it for a week or two.
Yeah, full reviews/comparisons are embargoed. It's sort of weird to me that they've embargoed it when they're launching in europe next week and they're already sold out. What's the point anymore?
My understanding is that the software is not complete yet. At least one unboxing/ initial hands on mentioned that the camera app is missing the new features cinematic pan etc. Google don't want people reviewing the camera when it's not the final software.
Thanks for the info. Can pick up my Sorta Sage on Thursday this week! Very excited to test it out!
This guy's shows some samples compared to the pixel 4

Categories

Resources