Almost all the websites are saying that galaxy S5 has the older snapdragon 800 processor and they are thinking that Xperia Z2 has superior processor but now it is confirmed that S5 has in fact better SOC than Z2
http://blog.gsmarena.com/mystery-so...801-and-is-it-powering-the-samsung-galaxy-s5/
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7768/galaxy-s5-initial-thoughts
I wouldn't say it's better, it's clocked a little higher. Those speeds could easily be reached overclocking just a tid bit.
In z2 is AB version and s5 is AC ver. AC > AB
Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk 4
hiepgia said:
In z2 is AB version and s5 is AC ver. AC > AB
Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU is clocked at 550mhz ,CPU is clocked at 2.36 Ghz in the AB
and 578mhz,2.46Ghz for the AC
Memory bandwith is same however.
And from what we know S5 uses AC and Z2 uses AB.
Same cores, just higher binned.
Related
I have a HP Pavilion Slimline s5213w desktop with amd sempron tm processor LE 1250.......will this cpu (AMD Athlon II X4 Llano 641 2.80 GHz Quad-core Processor - Socket FM1) work without a problem on my computer if i upgrade?
downgrader said:
I have a HP Pavilion Slimline s5213w desktop with amd sempron tm processor LE 1250.......will this cpu (AMD Athlon II X4 Llano 641 2.80 GHz Quad-core Processor - Socket FM1) work without a problem on my computer if i upgrade?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wont work because they are different sockets. You need an AM2 socket, and the one you are looking at is an FM1 socket.
what about Intel Pentium E5700 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Desktop Processor... is that compatible?
downgrader said:
what about Intel Pentium E5700 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Desktop Processor... is that compatible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
never mind this one was intel.. ive got it..thanks 4 the help
You can use any AM3 socket cpus on your motherboard as they are compatible with AM2 sockets. The highest power rating for the processor your motherboard will allow is 95W.
You might need a BIOS update to get it working though.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103912
There is no point to get a faster cpu than the one above as your mobo wont be able to utilize its full potential.
---------- Post added at 01:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 AM ----------
Its also unlocked so you can still keep the CPU and overclock it later on if you update your motherboard or the rest of your system.
I watched a YouTube video review of a rom to flash, and the guy mentioned he had a 2 core kernel...
Is there an advantage other that maybe battery consumption as to why you would use a 2 core kernel vice the stock quad core?
not really pretty much the only thing you could expect is worse or same ui performance and the battery savings end up being less than the 50% you'd expect from nixing half your cores. Which is the reason Google decided to just turn all 4 cores on all the time rather than plugging and unplugging them as needed. Minimal battery savings wasn't worth the sluggish ui.
You may not get any battery savings, depending on usage. If you have fewer cores to process tasks, that means that the two that are there would have a higher percentage of run time in a higher power state. If they stay in the high power state longer, you'd end up using more battery rather than less. Using all of the cores allows the system to get to the idle/low power state faster.
Also i believe with all 4 cores running continuously, sharing the work load, it produces less heat as opposed to having only 2 cores running mostly at a higher state which would keep the phone warm most of the time.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Well I was just curious. It was a video review of pure nexus and he briefly mentioned that he had the dual core kernel flashed but he didn't elaborate, so I figured I'd ask.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Here in Thailand the Samsung shop has 2 different S2 8.0 tablets. They are $30 difference in price. One has fast charge,the other one doesn't. Is this true? I can't find this information anywhere. Thank you.
FastCharge drastically reduces the life of the battery, its not meant to be left on. Just FYI.
None of the models support fast charge.
Sent from my SM-T813 using Tapatalk
Hello guys...I am new to the community but I greatly admire the work you guys do
Hope my confusion will be solved.
Neither. If you are really looking for long run you should buy Moto e4 plus (80 odd usd) or Moto e5 plus (180 odd usd). Each charge of battery lasts for 3-4 days in these phones. That means every year you'd be charging the phone approximately 100 times. Phone battery goes down to 50% by 500 chraging cycle. And the battery capacity severely affects cpu performances. Plus these phones would never get any updates and the performances would not change in terms of operating system. As apps evolve and demand more RAM, the phone would feel increasingly slower. But given 3GB ram on E5 plus and expandable storage, and 5G LTE coming soon (full rollout by 2020), you'd feel better to get rid of the 180 usd phone after 2-2.5 years of usage. (I use a Boost Moto G6 play myself for media consumption (80 usd) with an iPhone 6s plus (4 year old now - did a 29 usd battery change) as the daily driver, this is an unbiased "opinion").
I mean this with all due respect and reverence to SB581240. And I write this from a strictly pragmatic and realistic point of view.
I would suspect that battery life plays a factor in most smartphone purchases. I would also guess that probably less than 10% of all smartphone buyers, would rank battery life as the single most important feature. I'm going to assume that the OP is considering the phone's as a whole, and not how often he has to charge it in a given year. So with those ideas mentioned, allow me to introduce the likely facts...
Lets start with the battery idea, just for grins. This is regarding the previous post and the recommendation of the E5 Plus. Anything after that will be strictly dealing with the Redmi vs Moto G6, as thats what the subject of the OP deals with.
The Redmi Note 5 Pro has a 4000ma battery, compared to the e5 plus 5000ma. Yes, the e5 has approximately 25% more 'juice'. While this is true, it doesn't tell the whole story. 1)The Snapdragon 636 in the Redmi is built on a much more modern and extremely more efficient 14nm process. The MUCH Older E5's platform is based upon a Snapdragon 425 and its 28nm process. Remember, this processor was first available in the summer of 2016. The Redmi's 14nm process 636 was introduce just last fall. Physics and real-world testing show that the 14nm process is approximately 35% more efficient. To put that in perspective -- think about it like this. If all things were equal between the two phones, except for the 14/28nm processes.... the Redmi would last approximately 35% longer on a charge. So simply adding a 25% larger battery, would not bridge the difference. The Redmi would still win by around 10% in single charge life expectancy. We must also take into consideration the type of charging that is offered. The Redmi wins out in a landslide... using today's Quick Charge 4.0, while the E5 uses the largely outdated 2.0. The difference in staggering. The 4.0 will give an approx 50% charge (from 0%) in about 5 minutes. The 2.0 will take around 30-45 minutes to do the same. Last thing I'll say about the battery... the Redmi, as I've pointed out, has a 4000mah. The G6 has just a 3000mah. A full 33% more juice with the Redmi.
Now lets get down to the facts that most of us care about between the Note 5 Pro and the G6:
CPU: The snapdragon 636 vs 450. The 636 wins in a landslide. Both are on 14nm dies. But the 636 is on a whole other level. Geekbench single core performance is approximately 90% higher (roughly double). 1385 vs 750. Multi-Core performance is 4700 vs 3800. Both use 8 cores, but the Redmi uses Big/Little styles with 4x cores being A72's compared to the G6 using A53's. This is where the single core performance just blows it away.
RAM: Again, the Redmi is lightyears ahead here. It has 50% MORE RAM than the G6. Further, the G6 uses a slower and somewhat outdated DDR3 ram @ 933mhz, while the Redmi uses the modern DDR4 @ 1333mhz. Recall, Swap, and ZRAM are vastly improved because of this.
I could go line by line highlighting the differences and the advantages of going with the Redmi 5 Pro... There's really no comparison. Today, and definitely 'tomorrow'.. the Redmi is the way to go.
I love my Motorola G6 Play. Its a nice mid-level budget phone. It does everything I want and need it to do. Mine is rooted, and I use kernel auditor, along with L-Speed scripts. I have improved my between charge times from about 30 hours up to a current best of 52 hours. I use a custom conservative governor that I modded the tuneables for unbelievable responsiveness and quick factoring down. I also use an alternative GPU governor. On top of this, L-Speed allows me to use aggressive doze, and several battery related tweaks... and literally puts the phone into "Deep Sleep" seconds after the screen turns off... using next to nothing in power as long as its in this state. 8-9 hours of screen off time at night consumes 1% of the battery. And by using Kernel Auditor, I have 3 profiles saved. 1)the conservative tune for battery life. 2)a multitasking tune for heavier use of resources when doing multiple tasks. 3)a gaming profile for locked in 1401mhz/650mhz cpu/gpu, LMK tweaks, entropy adjustments, and heavy I/O tweaks.
This phone is optimized in every way that is currently available, and for any form of use that I can come up with. So no complaints.
FYI, I'll be starting a thread in the coming days listing the different profiles I've mentioned here so that others may double their battery life, or increase their performance by 10-15% if they so choose.
Thanks for reading!
There is a long response above, which I believe is informative (because I have no clue). Just for a reference, 5G is coming really soon, so strap on your chest belts, your phones with all its 8GB RAM, 1TB ROM, 4-5-6 clusters of cameras are going to be dumpster-ready soon.
Now, just for a quick reference: iPhone X has 3GB RAM, it has the best-in-class AMOLED display which is a drag on RAM but nevertheless 3GB. A11 Bionic is faster than any Snapdragon (including 845). So that's that. Fastest processor, best display, 3GB RAM.
I know we are on XDA and all these RAM processor battery entropy adjustments LMK tweaks are really important and so on. But as I have a limited perspective on these things, if I am buying a phone today, the only feature I'd be interested in is the price. Why? All phones will be dumpster-ready by 2019.
Hi,
so very recently I got the Samsung S10e. Unfortunately as I am european it is the Exynos variation (rip me). I actually wouldn't mind the less performance but I immediately noticed that my device gets notably warm/hot with low load. For example upon first boot the device updated a few apps and it already got warm. I installed AnTuTu Benchmark to see what the temps are at. After a samsung patch (around 780 MB) it got to 38 degrees celsius for battery and 63 degrees on CPU.
I also run the 15min stress test from AnTuTu and the temps went up to 39 degrees for the battery and 69 degrees for the cpu. For example my old phone (snapdragon 835) was at 40 degrees on battery and almost stable 38ish degrees for cpu.
Could you run the AnTuTu stress test as well? I would really like to know how other exynos and snapdragon models are performing temperature wise. Thank your for helping.
My snapdragon runs between 29C to 37C when running. 37C is when plugged in to charger. It runs warmer than my note9 did.
View attachment 4761745
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk