I've got both the S20 ultra, with its 5k mah battery and the p40 pro with its 4.2k battery. I'm getting better battery life from the p40 pro ? so far anyway. Latest 114 update is on the p40 pro
Please post your consumption
With 50% left this ain't bad at all. I am using 60gz though, I see no real benefit of 90hz. So minor to my eyes. No Google installed either
It looks as though not having you're screen on 90hz makes a large difference.
On average over 21h usage I'm getting 7 to 8hours of SOT but then the battery will be about 10% my screen is set to 90hz spo I must use a lot of power.
That's one hell of a mobile phone order :good: how is the Samsung ultra which do you prefer? How is the build quality between the two which feels better?
Combatfroggy said:
It looks as though not having you're screen on 90hz makes a large difference.
On average over 21h usage I'm getting 7 to 8hours of SOT but then the battery will be about 10% my screen is set to 90hz spo I must use a lot of power.
That's one hell of a mobile phone order :good: how is the Samsung ultra which do you prefer? How is the build quality between the two which feels better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel is subjective. Both in cases so can't really feel. P40 being smaller is more comfortable.
That snapdragon gpu is a beast. And that phone never gets above 35c whether fast charging or games. P40 pro is about 3 to 5 degrees celcius hotter generally.
They both play any game easily. When it comes to difficult emulator games the snapdragon is a few frames better
The p40 pro is more efficient even with smaller battery, I'll try 90hz tomorrow
S20 ultra looks more premium, just. Has better sounding speakers too but the p40 pro is louder
The p40 pro has a better camera. Not by much, generally better zoomed in pics. Much better low light and better focus ?
Leaning towards keeping the p40 pro
Samsung have had a focus problem on there phones since 9 series devices...
I'm not sure whether to send the p40 back and keep the note 10+ or not??
I do prefer emui over Samsung ui
You can see the difference in the power drain between 90 hz and 60hz on the attached photo. 60hz being the bottom power drain.
I have also noticed that you can turn off 5G up in the quick settings which might save some power? No point having it turned on when hardly anywhere has 5G
Combatfroggy said:
You can see the difference in the power drain between 90 hz and 60hz on the attached photo. 60hz being the bottom power drain.
I have also noticed that you can turn off 5G up in the quick settings which might save some power? No point having it turned on when hardly anywhere has 5G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That does look substantial. I'm checking this myself. I prefer EMUI too can't stand Samsungs new battery info layout
Started another battery cycle with the screen set to 60hz and 5G off. And after 1 hour of usage and 1hr of SOT I'm at 98%!
Very interested to see the results tomorrow evening.
lawtq said:
I've got both the S20 ultra, with its 5k mah battery and the p40 pro with its 4.2k battery. I'm getting better battery life from the p40 pro ? so far anyway. Latest 114 update is on the p40 pro
Please post your consumption
With 50% left this ain't bad at all. I am using 60gz though, I see no real benefit of 90hz. So minor to my eyes. No Google installed either
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if your ultra is exynos its not suprising you get bad battery life out of the s20
xnostra said:
if your ultra is exynos its not suprising you get bad battery life out of the s20
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's snapdragon
lawtq said:
It's snapdragon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well that is more bad then cause the snapdragon is the best one with regards to s20 ultra but i know their optimization is really not good maybe thats why you get bad sot
xnostra said:
well that is more bad then cause the snapdragon is the best one with regards to s20 ultra but i know their optimization is really not good maybe thats why you get bad sot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not bad with the snapdragon. It's good actually. It's just better with the p40 pro
Which one are you sticking with the s20 or the Huawei?
lawtq said:
Feel is subjective. Both in cases so can't really feel. P40 being smaller is more comfortable.
That snapdragon gpu is a beast. And that phone never gets above 35c whether fast charging or games. P40 pro is about 3 to 5 degrees celcius hotter generally.
They both play any game easily. When it comes to difficult emulator games the snapdragon is a few frames better
The p40 pro is more efficient even with smaller battery, I'll try 90hz tomorrow
S20 ultra looks more premium, just. Has better sounding speakers too but the p40 pro is louder
The p40 pro has a better camera. Not by much, generally better zoomed in pics. Much better low light and better focus ?
Leaning towards keeping the p40 pro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I believe snapdragon still better for gaming. Only problem is our area only have the exynos varient
My Mate 20 Pro with 4200 mAh was easily the best smartphone that I owned in terms of battery life. I also used to have a Honor 8 Pro for a while and it had good battery life as well. So I'm not surprised that the P40 Pro's battery life is great. Maybe it's because of Huawei's "aggressive RAM management", not sure.
I don't think the p40pro is in the same league as the mate 20 Pro that things battery was epic.
I have the p40 pro. Everytime it reaches 13%, i know it'll run out of battery soon, less than 5 minutes. Is this happening to you too? Cause it's really frustrating. My old p30 pro never did this...
lawtq said:
I've got both the S20 ultra, with its 5k mah battery and the p40 pro with its 4.2k battery. I'm getting better battery life from the p40 pro ? so far anyway. Latest 114 update is on the p40 pro
Please post your consumption
With 50% left this ain't bad at all. I am using 60gz though, I see no real benefit of 90hz. So minor to my eyes. No Google installed either
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in a similar if lower specced (but only just) kinda of boat currently using the Samsung note 10 lite and I just got the P40 non pro this week.
Battery life is definitely way better on the P40. The Samsung I'm using very lightly right now (mainly yt music and regular phone calls) and it doesn't last that much longer than the P40 which is in use almost all ways. If not it's probably a hot-spot or always on display or both.
Turning off 5g definetley makes a difference. I'm in London so I have 5g almost everywhere but even with 5g disabled and lower battery usage I'm seeing really fast connection speed (over 700B/s)
Really want to make a test of the ultra pow energy mode. My phone thinks it can achieve ove 60 hours run time from 69% battery charge. If that's really possible just wow.
I haven't tested a lot of games yet but I have fired up xplane. It ran perfectly looked gorgeous in this tiny pixel dense screen and hardly used the battery faster than browsing. Got some emulators too they run like honey and the phone doesn't even get hot at all so far in the emulators I've tried.
Related
Just recieve mine yesterday. More than 10h SoT in a single charge. ¡Insane!
For some reason all the real consumers are having great battery life but it is not reflected in benchmarks tests done by the "reviewers".
Can you compare your battery life with similar usage on the phone you used previously ?
warea said:
For some reason all the real consumers are having great battery life but it is not reflected in benchmarks tests done by the "reviewers".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well only reliable review so far has come from gsmarena.. all other tests are amateur/random tests, but gsmarena has a history/experience and most importantly reliable test pattern judging from my own experience.
Phones which score in between 80-90h in gsmarena battery test (https://www.gsmarena.com/battery-test.php3) are top tier 1 phone in terms of battery performance in real life based on my experience. I change phones almost as often as socks , so my statement is valid.
From my personal experience and usage pattern phones, which score in between 80-90h in gsmarena battery test, have SOT of at least ~5 hours in the heaviest of usage and up to ~8 hours of SOT in more relaxed scenarios. Like for instance OP5 constantly gives ~5 hours of SOT, but when you have long youtube usages together with heavy usage you reach the mentioned ~8hours of SOT.
My usage pattern -> Mostly whatsapp, youtube, chrome, some Spotify and Waze with BT, Location, SYNC always ON.
True the battery life is among the very top league in any case where there are only few top range phones (mid-range phones are not a fair comparison).
That said the we have yet to get an explanation as to why the bigger 4000mAh size battery advantage is not reflected into battery life advantage against other competitors despite Huawei promoting it big that they have a 4000mAh against their competitors. Also why the promised 30% better battery life than Mate 9 is not showing yet. I am eager to read the Anandtech review which is the best in breaking down the details when it comes to explaining all this but on the other hand im hoping they wait 1-2 months for more stable rom before doing their tests.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/mate-10/how-to/battery-life-thread-t3695518
I only use 'daily use' to check the battery life.
I try my best to use it as a normal person and after that i use it how i use it (heavy).
I'm not a fan of benchmark and software to test smartphones, it doesn't always give you the right answer...
Didn't the moto z play get a bad battery review from a benchmarking review site? I used that phone heavy for almost 2 days on a single charge. it was insane!
Even though gsmarena review of Mate 10 pro is not out but they have updated their specs and the battery test score is listed now. Mate 10 pro gets a 96h, making it an undoubted beast in battery life. So if all true, then the FHD+ oled combination did help over the Mate 10 standard. And also for comparison, the smaller 5.5 inch display Mate 9 pro which was QHD had a 87h score.
https://www.gsmarena.com/battery-test.php3
warea said:
Even though gsmarena review of Mate 10 pro is not out but they have updated their specs and the battery test score is listed now. Mate 10 pro gets a 96h, making it an undoubted beast in battery life. So if all true, then the FHD+ oled combination did help over the Mate 10 standard. And also for comparison, the smaller 5.5 inch display Mate 9 pro which was QHD had a 87h score.
https://www.gsmarena.com/battery-test.php3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great,i think they are preparing Mate 10 pro review cause i saw some Video test on YouTube
warea said:
I am eager to read the Anandtech review which is the best in breaking down the details when it comes to explaining all this but on the other hand im hoping they wait 1-2 months for more stable rom before doing their tests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah Anandtech is the best. Made me buy my Mate 8 though the 10 is coming because it's obviously a huge improvement over 2 generations. I bet they will have a review up by January. Bit late but thorough as usual.
The non pro version is worst than the pro in battery life ??
jvidia said:
The non pro version is worst than the pro in battery life ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2k screen kinda takes its toll on the battery.
robogo1982 said:
2k screen kinda takes its toll on the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's really oled efficiency
How is the mate 10 non pro (LCD) battery compared to the Mate 9 as it also has LCD?
jvidia said:
How is the mate 10 non pro (LCD) battery compared to the Mate 9 as it also has LCD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the Mate 8 9 and 10. Have to be honest, the battery on the 9 sucked but the 10 is amazing. I was initially reserved but just the other day i was down to 25% by end of day and i have about 4.5 hours SOT. This was a first for me and i did not do any tweaking. Ive never had a phone go past 3 hours SOT and i have cycled through a ton of phones. So if you're an out of the box guy with only a few simple tweaks like wifi, bluetooth and gps off, this phone is going to be a dream. I left the screen at 2k mind you.
So can we all agree if the Mate 10 gets an average of 5hrs + of SOT then this is what is expected of a 4000mAh battery?
Is SOT the best measure for battery life or is standby/usage hours (eg: 16-18 hours use) the better measure?
I get mixed SOT between 5 - 7 hours max.
My usage is around 17 - 18 hours max.
I would say I am a heavy user.
How on earth people get 10 hrs SOT baffles me.
tboy2000 said:
How on earth people get 10 hrs SOT baffles me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just learn to ignore that its always been like that (user posting crazy,in-explainable SOT times), even with phones which have the ****-yest of battery life out-there.
I look at this the following way - if my phone has +5.5" screen I am more than happy if I get ~5-7hours of SOT during heavy usage
jemeljsh said:
just learn to ignore that its always been like that (user posting crazy,in-explainable SOT times), even with phones which have the ****-yest of battery life out-there.
I look at this the following way - if my phone has +5.5" screen I am more than happy if I get ~5-7hours of SOT during heavy usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll lean to ignore your pessimism while enjoying my 10+ hours SOT
lawtq said:
I'll lean to ignore your pessimism while enjoying my 10+ hours SOT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even if that were to be true, I don't care as long as I hit ~6-7hours of SOT with my usage pattern.
Don't get me wrong. I am not trying to challenge/refute your statement or the result you can reach. See, usage patterns vary from person to person, therefore I tend to reserve my judgement whether this or that phone is bad in terms of battery life before I actually use it. The only source I do trust judging from my own experience is gsmarena battery test -> any phone that has gsmarena endurance rating in between 80-100hours will be great SOT/battery life performance wise for me. Phones in that endurance rating range have always been great in terms of SOT considering my usage pattern and I consider great any phone that can do ~6hours of SOT on a 5.5"+ screen . That's about it.
p.s. one great example of SOT results was my experience with OP5. With regular daily heavy usage I was getting ~6h of SOT on single charge, but when I mixed in super long hours of youtube that same cycle would be give 10h of SOT, but it would be rather misleading to claim that OP5 is a 10h SOT phone, since its simply better @videoplayback in terms of battery consumption.. usage patterns differ from person to person and the results vary a lot depending on what the particular device is better at..
jvidia said:
The non pro version is worst than the pro in battery life ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems weird, but I could be on 1 of the 2 things: display efficiency or resolution.
Resolution, strangely, didn't affect other phones that much.
But this can be testes with EMUI by lowering it to FHD, according to other members here.
I can't verify this, but when I buy this phone, if it's possible, I'll definitively lower the resolution. (I can't notice the difference)
The non pro is still almost no where to be found in Europe, right?
Hi all.
I have written a comment to another created threat in mi 9 forum, but I would like to read your comments here too.
I'm having battery draining and SOT problems with my mi 9, like I said in title (like most people I think).
I have tried everything to improve my battery life in my mi 9, and It's not bad at all, but I was expecting better performance for a top xiaomi smartphone with sd 855 and 5 months old in spite of the fact that it has "only" 3300mah battery ...
I'm not a heavy user and I try to get max SOT and minimum battery drain in all my phones, because I don't like changing smartphones very often and I like to take care of it.
I came from a Moto G4 plus, and I had 5h of SOT in 48h without high standby drainage (maybe 1-2% of drainage overnight in 7-9h) with a 3 years old battery and worst hardware and software. In mi 9, I'm getting 5-6h of SOT in 48-72h. Not bad at all, but standby drainage is awfull. It loses 20-25% of the battery every 48h (3-5% overnight), and in a smartphone with such a fair battery it's a problem. If I'm not getting great results with not heavy use and my smartphone is new, I don't want to think in 2-3 years + mid-heavy use ... I have tried everything (full wipes, reinstalling, the most powerfull battery saving, etc) and I don't have great result. Standby drainage is very hight compared to other phones (I have tried a friend poco f1 and I had 10h in 48-72h with 1% overnight drainage. It was awsome).
And now the question ...
I'm thinking of changing my mi 9 for a huawei mate 20... I still have the 30d Amazon refund and I am not comfortable with my phone's battery.
- Mate 20 pros vs mi 9: +700 mah battery and more efficient, the best ips panel without burn-in problem, and fingerprint sensor behind the screen (no like too much in-screen fingerprint at all).
- Pros mi 9 vs mate 20: sd 855 (but geekbech it's very very similar, and antutu winner is mi 9 only for gamming but mate 20 still on top), unlocking bootloader for mi 9 (better comunity in xda, but if emui works well I think I don't need custom rooms, the problem here is Trump/google vs China ... but now apeares to be solved and we would have newer updates to Android Q), wireless charging (I don't use it because smartphone is hotter when charging 3-5º vs cable+1,5a charger, It takes more time to charge with elevated temperature), not jack (better for waterproof), maybe very little better cameras in mi 9 and little better results, 4 months younger (very little difference) and It's the top phone on xiaomi (mate 20 is the little brother because we have mate 20 pro, 20x, p30, p30 pro and we will have soon mate 20 and mate 20 pro; and that could be worst because we will get latter uptdates in mate 20).
What do you think? Would you change mi 9 for mate 20? Reading your comments. Greetings.
If your looking for better battery life I'd say get the mate 20. I've had mine for just under 3 months. Best damn purchase I've ever made (purchased way below retail during trump ban). I consider myself a medium to heavy user (I don't play mobile games however). With some useless features turned off and some fetch services disabled. I can easily get 8-10 hrs on screen time with this phone, it's the best battery life I've ever had, prior I was getting 4hrs with another Android phone.
Andrew Tuon said:
If your looking for better battery life I'd say get the mate 20. I've had mine for just under 3 months. Best damn purchase I've ever made (purchased way below retail during trump ban). I consider myself a medium to heavy user (I don't play mobile games however). With some useless features turned off and some fetch services disabled. I can easily get 8-10 hrs on screen time with this phone, it's the best battery life I've ever had, prior I was getting 4hrs with another Android phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about heat and performance?
quiquetdelcampet said:
What about heat and performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heat? I haven't had any issues with heat if by that you mean does the phone get too hot to touch, it's cool the majority of the time. As for performance, EMUI 9.1 is very smooth and I haven't had any slow downs ??.
Andrew Tuon said:
Heat? I haven't had any issues with heat if by that you mean does the phone get too hot to touch, it's cool the majority of the time. As for performance, EMUI 9.1 is very smooth and I haven't had any slow downs .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what about temperature playing PUBG mobile for example 30 min? Have you tried?
Really thanks!
quiquetdelcampet said:
And what about temperature playing PUBG mobile for example 30 min? Have you tried?
Really thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry bud I don't play games on my phone, wouldn't know.
quiquetdelcampet said:
And what about temperature playing PUBG mobile for example 30 min? Have you tried?
Really thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After 30 mins of Asphalt 9 the device is damn cold... Could even be used as a cooler
xphy32 said:
After 30 mins of Asphalt 9 the device is damn cold... Could even be used as a cooler
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a month ago I had Poco F1. On the battery Sot was similar to the 20 mate. Night drainage in Poco 1-3%, mate 2-5%. Mate saves better on screen on. Performance similar to Poco. If I had to exchange Mi9, it was on mi9t Pro.
So I made a test. 4K30 Video, 15 minutes.
S20+ vs S21 Ultra
Result?
S20+ lost 5% battery (CPU afterwards 41° Celsius)
S21 Ultra lost 7% battery (CPU afterwards 44° Celsius)
The S21 also felt way hotter to the touch.
How can that be? I thought the Exynos 990 was way worse? How can a phone with a larger battery lose more battery and also get hotter.
Samsung has to fix this. And this is with 4K30 not 4K60 or 8K24. I guess it will melt in the summer while shooting a video.
That's a known problem already. Let's just hope its software related so Samsung can fix it soon. As far as I am aware s20 line had this similar issue before too and it was fixed after a few software updates.
My Snapdragon S21U also runs a lot hotter than N20U Snapdragon
iamnotkurtcobain said:
So I made a test. 4K30 Video, 15 minutes.
S20+ vs S21 Ultra
Result?
S20+ lost 5% battery (CPU afterwards 41° Celsius)
S21 Ultra lost 7% battery (CPU afterwards 44° Celsius)
The S21 also felt way hotter to the touch.
How can that be? I thought the Exynos 990 was way worse? How can a phone with a larger battery lose more battery and also get hotter.
Samsung has to fix this. And this is with 4K30 not 4K60 or 8K24. I guess it will melt in the summer while shooting a video.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you shoot in wqhd and 120hz on the S21U and you ask why it's hotter and lost more batterry ?
UNIK97122 said:
you shoot in wqhd and 120hz on the S21U and you ask why it's hotter and lost more batterry ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had FHD+ on the S20+ and S21 Ultra and it's 60hz while using the camera.
Dear friends who have problem with overheating, did you get March updated and did they fix overheating?
Thx a lot
March made it worse in my case
UNIK97122 said:
you shoot in wqhd and 120hz on the S21U and you ask why it's hotter and lost more batterry ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera doesn't shoot at 120hz it goes down to 60hz in the camera application.
Hi, thanks for any help.
I'm between a mi 11 or a OnePlus 8/9 pro and the only thing I'm concerned about is whether MIUI might be a bit buggy or 'incomplete' feeling - seen mixed things on the forum. I've read many of the reviews so know most of the basics re battery / camera etc.
Generally with the stock ROMs do people find they have any frequently annoying issues?
It's also a bit quieter than other phones with custom ROMs - is that because it's a newer handset or is it unlikely that these will be developed?
People generally happy with their purchase?
Thanks for your help
I would recommend the OnePlus 9 Pro, the Mi 11 has AWFUL battery life.
Wahoux said:
I would recommend the OnePlus 9 Pro, the Mi 11 has AWFUL battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My battery life is normal/fine.
Wahoux said:
I would recommend the OnePlus 9 Pro, the Mi 11 has AWFUL battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean?
For me mi 11 is the phone with best battery life of all phones I had. I think battery is very good, but probably if you are a heavy gamer it won't last that long. But then no phone will last 2 days with top performance. It is like wanting a race car but no gas consumption.
I find the battery life good enough I get around 6-7 sot that must be around similar to other high end using similar spec also don't forget this actually is cheaper , fhd 120hz , fhd because I cant notice the difference
The battery life is really not that bad.. It easily lasts me through the whole day, with 5-6hrs of SOT (120HZ, 1440P resolution always on) Also the included charger is really fast, so even if the battery life is not the best, it can be easily fully charged in 35-40minutes.
I recently got a new 12 Pro as I hoped Xiaomi fixed the screen and proximity issues from 11T Pro. The 11T Pro is a great phone, the issues I had was a lazy proximity screen sensor which just didn't operate as smooth as an iPhone or Galaxy. No other flaws. So I decided to go with a 12 Pro looking for that screen improvement and a better proximity sensor.
The 12 Pro is everything 11T Pro is, except it does have a better screen more pixels,better colours, resolution and fingerprint recognition that instantly wakes the screen as soon as you touch it!
But still I can get over it that the difference in these two phones is minimal. Genuinely 11T Pro is a monster phone with great components and even better price. If I knew what I was getting, I probably would have stuck with 11T Pro as, 12 Pro is certainly not worth buying of you are coming from 11Tp.
So far from my own tests and checks, 11T Pro tops 12 Pro in every aspect, speed, opening of apps, images and videos rendering which I find a bit disappointed that older phone performs better them a new flagship.
For your info I attached a few screenshot from Antutu Benchmark and Geekbench tests.
So you got what you wanted?
The chipsets are nearing their thermal limits; faster processors, 5G and variable refresh rate displays use more mAh and generate more heat as a byproduct. The area to dissipate this thermal load is largely fixed by the dimensions of the device means hotter running devices. Not a pretty picture when you consider the implications.
Worse accurate color calibration of variable refresh rate displays is imperfect, there are simple too many variables. If color calibration is off, the gamma correction gets skewed even more.
Xiaomi probably had room for improvement with their displays. Samsung's display performance in terms of color rendering accuracy zenithed with the Note 10+.
At least you got a better display.
Samsung's S22U can't offer me that or SOT that's better even with a larger 700 mAh battery. It is a buttery smooth better hand warmer though
Sometimes hardware upgrades aren't a good option...
I also have both phones and I completely agree with nothing you said.
NOSS8 said:
I also have both phones and I completely agree with nothing you said.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's your battery on 12 pro? I find mine really poor
Evo400 said:
How's your battery on 12 pro? I find mine really poor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on the usage and I'm using a Xiaomi EU rom.
blackhawkexplained the why and how very well.
Xiaomi Eu rom,same apps same usage.
Poco f2 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 4700mHa +/- 38 hours/ AOSP +/- 48 hours
11 T pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5000 mHa +/- 35 hours
12 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 4600 mHa +/- 30 hours
Sony Xperia J(st26) Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 1750 mHa +/- 15 days
Thanks for that.
I'm also using latest Xiaomi. EU ROM on my 12.
11T pro is still on the global ROM
I find the 12 is really heavy on the battery for pretty much very same task and style of usage in comparison to 11T. The battery gets to 25% by mid day while this never occurred with 11T. ( That would be at least around 50%)
According to battery app what seems to drain the batteries on the 12 is the screen! Although I don't have display on,60hz only, etc .
Evo400 said:
Thanks for that.
I'm also using latest Xiaomi. EU ROM on my 12.
11T pro is still on the global ROM
I find the 12 is really heavy on the battery for pretty much very same task and style of usage in comparison to 11T. The battery gets to 25% by mid day while this never occurred with 11T. ( That would be at least around 50%)
According to battery app what seems to drain the batteries on the 12 is the screen! Although I don't have display on,60hz only, etc .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is possible that this will be fixed with the optimization updates of the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 .
Also the battery saver setting set to "close apps after 10 minutes works randomly".
I use a 30w charger.
NOSS8 said:
it is possible that this will be fixed with the optimization updates of the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 .
Also the battery saver setting set to "close apps after 10 minutes works randomly".
I use a 30w charger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are reports here that the latest beta release from Samsung greatly improved the S22U's performance. Global power management tends to cause erratic behaviors of most devices especially bluetooth apps.